reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 discusses the challenges and regrets of undergoing a sex change, mentioning the infection and unpleasant smell. They express frustration that transgender individuals receive more attention than "normie gays." Speaker 1 questions what the world should do when someone like them believes they can wake up as a new gender. They mention living as a new girl with a Y chromosome. Speaker 0 responds that only those who undergo surgery and have a smelly hole can truly be women. They mention the need to dilate to prevent the hole from closing. Speaker 1 shares their regret about the sex change and suggests they should have just been gay.

Speaker 0 asks how many transgender Americans have been mass shooters over the last ten years; Speaker 1 responds, Too many. The discussion shifts to the total number of mass shooters in America over the last decade, with Five presented as the count and described as a lot. The exchange ends with Speaker 0 asking again, Do you mind do you know how many mass shooters there have been in America over the last ten years? Speaker 1 says, Counting or not counting gang violence. Great.

Michelle Obama's real name is Michael, and she is transgender. Speaker 1 claims they would have thought people noticed "the dick in her pants." Speaker 1 also states that Obama is a homosexual and that they had the country and the whole world fooled. Speaker 1 believes Michelle Obama is a transgender. Speaker 0 asks if the country will see the first gay president or a woman president, but Speaker 1 insists Michelle is a transgender.

The speaker announced the defunding of non-essential programs within Maine's Department of Corrections. This action was taken in response to a male inmate being housed in a women's prison. The inmate in question is described as six foot one, two hundred forty-five pounds, and convicted of murdering his parents and the family dog with a knife. The speaker stated the inmate identifies as a woman. The speaker declared this will no longer be tolerated and affirmed a commitment to protecting women in prisons, sports, and throughout the country.

Female prisoners are being forced to live with sex offenders who identify as female, resulting in instances of rape. This issue is often overlooked because people dismiss prisoners as criminals. However, a lawyer argued that this violates the 8th Amendment, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. Many of these women have committed non-violent crimes, such as drug offenses. Despite this, they are placed in cells with male sex offenders who claim to be female, leading to sexual assault. Unfortunately, there is a lack of concern for this problem.

Female inmates at Minnesota's MCF Shakopi prison are sharing showers with Bradley Richard Servio, a 53-year-old man serving a life sentence for murder. Servio, who identifies as transgender, was transferred to the women's prison last year. Inmates express discomfort, feeling violated by having to share facilities with him, as he has not undergone any surgery. Concerns raised by inmates have been dismissed by prison officials, who stated they can only intervene if an incident occurs. Since 2023, six men, including those with histories of sexual abuse, have been transferred to the women's prison. The new gender identity policy, influenced by a lawsuit from the nonprofit Gender Justice, allows male inmates to request searches by female staff, raising further concerns among female inmates about their safety and well-being.

Speaker 0, identifying as the only Black lesbian in the room, asks Senator Winner a direct question about women’s safety in female-only spaces, referencing an incident at Gold’s Gym where she was attacked in a locker room by a self-identifying trans woman with a documented history of domestic violence. She asks what Senator Winner would say to women seeking assurance that their safety will be protected from men who, under California law, can self-identify as women in women-only spaces. Speaker 1 responds that “we want everyone to be safe,” and notes that trans people exist as both men and women, saying, “if you're trans women or women.” He emphasizes the need to protect safety for all, acknowledging that trans women are part of the discussion. Speaker 0 continues, praising Senator Winner for housing bills and other actions, but asserts that “millions of women across America are being harassed and sexually assaulted in locker rooms.” She reiterates that she is a lesbian Black woman, not transphobic or homophobic, and stresses that some bills passed by Winner are dangerous for women and young children. She states she represents her community and urges protection for women in light of concerns about trans-inclusive policies. Speaker 2 interjects, urging Speaker 0 to allow Senator Winner to respond, while Speaker 0 reiterates the need for protection of women, specifying “Women. Women. Trans women are doing things. Women. Women.” She asserts that she was assaulted, adding, “They are not. They are men.” She describes the assailant as someone who “broke his wife’s jaw” requiring reconstructive surgery, and emphasizes her identity as a lesbian who is Black. She invites another Black woman to share her feelings, while also challenging the presence of others in the room. Speaker 1 reiterates the goal of protecting the safety of all women and acknowledges that “trans women are also brutalized in this country.” The conversation emphasizes a tension between protecting women’s safety and acknowledging the experiences of trans women, with Speaker 0 insisting, “We cannot be raped in the bathrooms by men that wanna say they're women. They're not women.” Speaker 2 responds by leaving, citing that the group is not protecting women, and remarks on the bills, stating she has read many of them and still finds issues “not right.” The exchange ends with Speaker 2, introducing herself as Tish Heine, and a comment about not allowing Blackness and civil rights to be used to justify laws for children to transform, followed by a remark about disparities in access to tampons versus transformation medication. The conversation also touches on broader political history, with Speaker 1 and Speaker 0 referencing political dynamics, including a note that “things were going so smoothly” before recalling an earlier moment in 2008 involving Aaron Peskin.

The California law SB 132 allows men to be housed in women's prisons based on self-identification, leading to victimization of women like Alyssa who have experienced sexual assault. Male felons with violent backgrounds are exploiting this law, retraumatizing vulnerable women. The law does not require hormone therapy or surgery for placement, allowing for abuse of the system. Translation: The California law SB 132 allows men to be housed in women's prisons based on self-identification, leading to victimization of women like Alyssa who have experienced sexual assault. Male felons with violent backgrounds are exploiting this law, retraumatizing vulnerable women. The law does not require hormone therapy or surgery for placement, allowing for abuse of the system.

Speaker 0 contends that there is no link between immigration and sexual violence against women and girls. They then raise a pointed question about grooming gangs, identifying them as being of largely Pakistani descent that are “blotting our communities,” and ask if there is anything the other speaker has to say about this issue. Speaker 1 responds by saying the question is perfectly valid, but notes that they have moved on to other topics. They request to stick with the subject at hand. They explain that they were not asked to come in, and that they have strong feelings about immigration, which they stated in their reply. They state clearly that they are not going to start injecting racial connotations into discussions about immigration or crime. The brief phrase “The woman behind” appears at the end, implying a note about a person present, but the sentence is cut off.

During a hearing, a senator questions a judge about a case involving a male convicted of raping a nine-year-old boy and a seventeen-year-old girl, and later convicted of possessing child pornography. The senator challenges the judge's decision to allow this individual, now identifying as female, to be housed in a women's prison. The senator accuses the judge of prioritizing political ideology over the safety and rights of the female inmates, highlighting the judge's statement that the individual was "entirely a female" despite having male genitalia. The senator quotes the judge's order, where she stated there were "no signs that petitioner is at risk of re offending" and deemed concerns about potential trauma to female inmates as "overblown." The judge defends her decision, stating the petitioner had not engaged in violence while in custody, and wardens requested the transfer due to medical needs. She claims the denial of transfer by the transgender executive council was based on hormone levels, which she found to be a pretext.

Speaker 0 argues about genetics, Speaker 1 shifts to brain scans. Speaker 0 threatens violence. Speaker 2 mentions a criminal case involving a transgender person. Speaker 3 corrects someone on their gender, leading to a heated exchange.

Speaker 1 expresses that the situation is traumatizing and asserts that as a woman there is a space reserved for women. She questions the right of a transgender person to be in that space, stating, "he has a penis. A full and testicle. Okay? And and I don't care what it it's a man. You got one? You're a man." She argues that if they entered the men's section based on anatomy, it would be a man, and notes that they may not like women, but that for her and many other women, they do not feel comfortable and "it's not okay." She adds, "I'm sorry to talk to Okay? So well, I yeah. Yeah. You're sorry. You should be, sweetie, and you're out of alignment, and this is not right." She implies the other person is out of alignment and suggests attention to the situation, even commenting on the other person’s personal circumstances: "it must be hard not being a real man. Try it." She urges that every woman get all of their information. Speaker 0 responds, discussing a security guard who said that this is not allowed. Speaker 1 disregards the security guard's stance, insisting she does not care what the security guard says. Speaker 0 clarifies that the security guard doesn't want to be involved, and Speaker 1 insists that the guard should not have been present or allowed in the space. The exchange centers on whether a transgender person should be in the women's space and the authorities' stance on access. The discussion highlights discomfort, boundaries, and perceived inappropriateness from the perspective of Speaker 1, while Speaker 0 defers to the security guard's position. The dialogue ends with an emphatic consolidation of their stance: "Exactly. Thank you. Exactly. No."

Trans students have assaulted girls in bathrooms and locker rooms, despite claims of safety. Incidents in Virginia, California, Georgia, and Ohio show this trend. An inmate survey revealed high rates of sexual assault and violent crimes among trans individuals. Affirming gender transitions may lead to harm. The speaker challenges the audience's beliefs, emphasizing the importance of acknowledging these assaults and the consequences of denying privacy rights to women.

The Washington State Correctional Center For Women has been in the news for its policy of placing men who identify as women in the same prison as biological women. Inmates describe their experiences with transgender women in the prison, stating that some men are claiming to be women just to be placed there. The prison has been praised for its inclusivity, but some women feel unsafe and voice their concerns. The video also mentions the lack of response from the Washington Corrections Center For Women when asked for comment.

Speaker 0 expresses concern about going to a sports group and potentially being made uncomfortable. Speaker 1 argues that trans women are women and face the same risks of rape as cisgender women. Speaker 2 agrees and emphasizes that there should be no differentiation. Speaker 0 clarifies that they are not scared, but they just want to be able to go to the sports group without any issues. Speaker 1 suggests that Speaker 0 educate themselves on the topic, as there are many support groups available. Speaker 0 expresses frustration with being told they have to educate themselves.

Men who identify as women are taking opportunities from actual women in sports and media. This trend is seen in the best female athletes being men, men representing female products, and a man being named woman of the year. This deception is being challenged by women and men who oppose it, as it threatens society, family values, and women's rights. The speaker emphasizes the importance of addressing this issue before it causes irreversible harm.

Speaker 0 expresses concern about 1600 men being put in an audit camp with nothing to do, while also mentioning the issue of rape and murder. Speaker 1 responds with a dismissive comment. Speaker 0 criticizes people who don't care about what's happening and warns Speaker 1 about potential consequences. Speaker 1 challenges Speaker 0, who confidently tells Speaker 1 to do their best. The conversation ends with Speaker 0 telling Speaker 1 to watch their words.

Speaker 0 questions if Speaker 1 remains politically neutral while handing out materials in support of transgenderism. Speaker 1 denies being political and claims to be a community liaison officer for the LGBT community. Speaker 0 argues that allowing transgender individuals into women's spaces is an issue. Speaker 1 refuses to engage in the discussion and states they will not answer further questions.

The speaker questions Judge Netburn's prioritization of individual rights over political ideology. They discuss a case involving a male repeat rapist in a women's prison. The speaker criticizes Judge Netburn's decision, accusing her of prioritizing political ideology over the safety of female inmates. The speaker challenges Judge Netburn's reasoning and accuses her of being a radical judge. Judge Netburn defends her decision based on the petitioner's behavior in prison and medical needs. The speaker accuses Judge Netburn of contradicting her own report and questions her decision-making. Senator Padilla interrupts, preventing Judge Netburn from responding.

Speaker 0 discusses the challenges and regrets of undergoing a sex change, expressing concern about the infection and odor. They mention that attention towards transgender individuals is often overshadowed by "normie gays." Speaker 1 questions what the world should do when someone like them believes they can wake up as a new gender. They mention living as a new girl with a Y chromosome. Speaker 0 responds by stating that only those who undergo surgery and have a stinky hole can truly be considered women. They mention the importance of dilation to prevent the hole from closing. Speaker 1 reflects on their own experience, regretting the decision to remove their genitals and expressing a desire to have remained gay.

Speaker 0 explains that it's common to have fears based on past experiences, but it's important not to let those fears cloud our judgment. Speaker 1 expresses concern about trans women, but Speaker 0 encourages them to educate themselves and seek support from online groups. Speaker 1 argues that trans women are not women, but Speaker 0 emphasizes that being trans is not a belief system, but a fact. Speaker 0 clarifies that being trans is not a choice, just like being gay is not a choice. The conversation revolves around understanding and accepting transgender individuals.

Trans women entering women's spaces may have consequences. For instance, in a prison in New Jersey, two women were impregnated by a trans identified male while they were incarcerated.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about the whereabouts of unaccompanied children who crossed the border during President Biden's term. Speaker 1 doesn't have the exact figures but promises to provide them later. Speaker 0 then mentions that these children are being trafficked for sex, with estimates suggesting that at least 30% of young women and children are sexually abused during their journey. Speaker 1 doesn't have specific numbers but emphasizes that even one case is too many. They mention that any flagged cases are referred to appropriate authorities within 24 hours. Speaker 0 concludes by expressing concern about the volume of trafficking and the need to end this process that benefits drug cartels at the expense of child sex trafficking.

The speaker asks if requiring women to undress in front of Leah Thomas and allowing Leah Thomas to undress in front of female athletes constitutes sexual harassment. The other speaker responds that students should not feel unsafe in any locker room. The first speaker then asks if it constitutes sexual harassment to force women to undress in front of biological males, to which the second speaker expresses concern about forcing women to undress in front of biological males. The first speaker further asks if requiring female swimmers to dress with Leah Thomas, who identifies as male, would constitute sexual harassment. The second speaker requests the question to be repeated and states that it is not a yes or no question for them.