reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 reports that fertility clinics have observed drastic reproductive issues linked to inoculation: “the sperm of inoculated men does not swim. The eggs of inoculated women do not grow into embryos,” with those conceptions showing “a huge amount of contamination with stuff that's non organic.” They reference a Pfizer safety study in the first New England Journal of Medicine (June 2021), stating that, “if you look at the raw data, it proves that eighty percent of the women who get the shot in this first and second trimester, basically zero to twenty weeks, have an eighty percent miscarriage rate.” The baseline miscarriage rate is described as one in six, and they claim it is now seven to eight times that amount. Doctor James Thorpe is cited: a “seventy nine percent increase in fetal malformations” and “unprecedented numbers of stillbirths,” alleging censorship by the mainstream media. The speaker mentions a publication titled My Cycle Story with many scientists, including Doctor Hooker, presenting a database of “over 6,000 women that came forward because their voices were being silenced.” They note about “20,000 women on Facebook” discussing menstrual experiences, including reports of severe bleeding, not mild symptoms, and that “90 year olds beginning bleeding again.” The speaker describes clots: women calling with clots passing for weeks. They reference “two VAERS cases of little girls, 18 old girls, who hemorrhaged and died,” within the My Cycle Story data. The database included “over 6,000 women,” and they looked at the baseline rate of decidual cast shedding (the uterus shedding its entire inside in one piece, looking like a plaster cast). They report that in their data, it was “like two sixty nine women” who reported this. They note that most of the original database consisted of women who hadn’t even had the shot, implying the phenomenon affects coagulation pathways in the body and is not limited to vaccinated individuals. The speaker emphasizes the impact on fertility and reproductive health, warning of the potential horror for young women who “realize they will never be able to get pregnant because they had that shot.”

Speaker 0 summarizes that days after Bill Gates visits Singapore for a high-level meeting, the government quietly passes a new law granting the power to mandate injections and jail anyone who refuses. The law is laid out in the Infectious Diseases Act. Section 47 states that during any outbreak or even the suspicion of one, the director general of health can order any group of people to undergo vaccination or other prophylaxis. If individuals do not comply, they can be fined up to $20,000 or imprisoned for up to a year. Further, Section 67 ensures no accountability if something goes wrong, with no lawsuits or liability for the health officer, the doctor, or the government. The account notes that this is in Singapore, described as one of the strictest nations on earth, contrasting it with Singapore’s harsh anti-drug stance—public banners warn that possession of even 15 grams of heroin can carry the death penalty, with different penalties for drug offenses depending on age. The speaker then asserts a broader claim: beyond injections, the policy is about what those injections are doing. A new peer-reviewed study from Turkey is cited, claiming that mRNA COVID shots reduced female rats’ egg reserves by up to 60%, described as permanent destruction of primordial follicles, which determine how long a woman can have children. The speaker links this to a wider pattern observed in women, including menstrual disruption, early menopause, infertility, miscarriages, and fetal death, while asserting that no one is allowed to say it. The narration concludes by arguing that if this were any other drug, it would have been withdrawn from the market years ago, but instead the “pop agenda” is being pushed, with the implication that authorities and researchers are doubling down on the policy.

Johnson and Johnson developed Risperdal for schizophrenia but sought to market it for dementia despite knowing it could be fatal for dementia patients. After the FDA warned against its use for dementia, Johnson & Johnson sales representatives allegedly told psychiatrists not to worry about patient deaths, claiming they wouldn't get caught. They also suggested diagnosing patients with "late onset schizophrenia" to conceal their actions. The speaker claims this diagnosis is false and nonexistent. As a result, the speaker states that one in nine nursing home patients in the US are currently misdiagnosed with late onset schizophrenia to hide the drug's use.

Speaker 0 reports that hundreds of women across the US and UK are banding together to sue Pfizer over the Depo Provera birth control injection, alleging a link to brain tumor development. The lawsuits reference a French study from the previous year showing that women who received the birth control injection and used Depo Provera for more than a year were five times more likely to develop a meningioma, a specific type of brain tumor. The study is said to be robust, noting that eighteen thousand women in the study between 2009 and 2018 underwent brain surgery specifically for meningioma. The speaker emphasizes the scope of Depo Provera’s use, stating that more than forty million women have already used the injectable birth control. A 2021 publication in the Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care is cited, reporting that over forty-two million women were using injectable birth controls like Depo Provera. In the United States, this represents about twenty-five percent, or one quarter, of all sexually active women. The discussion places the current litigation in the context of earlier legal actions concerning hormonal birth control. The speaker notes that this is not the first class-action lawsuit about birth control companies not adequately warning users about potential health impacts. A 2014 settlement is recalled, where a pharmaceutical company agreed to a global settlement of $100,000,000 over NuvaRing-related issues, specifically blood clotting problems leading to deep vein thrombosis, stroke, or death. The speaker then shifts attention to other birth control options, pointing to Nexplanon, an implant placed in the arm, and remarks that videos or attention around Nexplanon suggest that a similar class action could be anticipated in the future. The overall sentiment conveyed is that there is growing public concern and scrutiny of hormonal birth control products and their health risks. Finally, the speaker notes that mainstream media and companies are questioning why women are quitting birth control, implying a broader trend of declining use in response to safety concerns and lawsuits.

Maddy DeGary, a participant in Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine trial for 12 to 15-year-olds, suffered serious injuries post-vaccination. Pfizer initially downplayed her condition as abdominal pain, misleading the FDA. Despite being wealthy, only after an email to FDA officials did Pfizer admit to DeGary's injuries. FDA's response was lackluster, showing no concern for Pfizer's misconduct. The failure to report all adverse events corrupts the trial process, with no repercussions for Pfizer's actions.

Speaker 0 describes a highly significant and controversial issue surrounding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines, including Gardasil and Cervarix, and reports that lawsuits are occurring worldwide. In Japan, there have been major lawsuits with hundreds of plaintiffs, including young women and girls, though the fundamental problem, according to the speaker, centers on contamination with DNA impurities. The speaker states that from the early days of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare in Japan, the core issue has been the contamination with DNA impurities in vaccines, and that this problem had already become clear by 2012 in a widely cited paper. The speaker explains that by 2012, a paper described the DNA contamination in Gardasil-related vaccines, specifically noting residual DNA fragments from HPV types 16 and 18 associated with the vaccine’s aluminum adjuvant particles. The claim is that vaccine samples contained residual HPV DNA fragments that were directly bound to aluminum adjuvant particles, and that PCR tests confirmed these DNA fragments were identical to the HPV sequences described in the paper. The speaker emphasizes that researchers around the world—doctors and researchers listening to women and girls’ voices—noticed unusual, severe post-vaccination symptoms in children and young women, and saw potential links between these symptoms and the residual HPV DNA attached to adjuvants. The testimony references samples gathered from multiple countries (Australia, Bulgaria, France, India, New Zealand, Poland, Russia, Spain, and the United States) and asserts that nearly all of the Gardasil/HPV vaccine lots examined contained residual HPV DNA attached to aluminum adjuvant particles. The speaker mentions that in the specific investigation, sixteen samples of Gardasil-4 contained residual HPV DNA fragments bound to aluminum adjuvant particles, and that all samples tested via PCR showed the same DNA sequence as described in the 2012 paper. The speaker claims that in 2014, the vaccine program for cervical cancer halted in Japan, and that the subsequent attention brought this issue to light publicly. The discussion attributes the major role to a Japanese expert, Ishii Ken (Ishii-sensei), described as a leading figure in Japan’s vaccine adverse-event research. The speaker recounts that, in the years around 2012–2014, efforts involved international collaboration with HR/HSA, FDA, and others, although logistical obstacles caused delays. The speaker notes that in 2012, 16 vaccine packages were distributed in nine countries for examination and that contamination persisted in all samples. They credit Japan with acting as a global relay for disseminating information about DNA contamination and its potential health implications. Further, the speaker references a broader context: the later emergence of literature discussing how DNA contamination might relate to adverse neurological or systemic symptoms, and the evolution of guidelines on acceptable residual DNA in vaccines. The discussion mentions that WHO and FDA guidelines permit changing permissible DNA limits over time, with higher thresholds introduced for manufacturing and regulatory purposes, raising questions about what constitutes safety and what is permissible in drug development. The dialogue closes with Speaker 1 alluding to the seriousness of the issue, noting deaths in the context of messenger-type vaccines and subsequent debates about vaccine safety, while acknowledging that those opposed to this view are also active.

The serotonin system was heavily targeted by the pharmaceutical industry, but experts suggest we're experimenting with it without full understanding. A 2022 systemic review of serotonin research found "no convincing evidence that depression is associated with or caused by lower serotonin concentration or activity." The FDA is considering a black box warning on related medications to ensure proper informed consent, especially for pregnant women, and to better inform doctors. Some doctors are unaware of the information presented in the FDA panel. The goal is radical transparency, ensuring everyone has informed consent with complete information.

A lawsuit against Merck alleges mishandling of Gardasil safety tests. Internal emails reveal Merck knew the vaccine was contaminated with HPV DNA fragments, which can trigger harmful immune responses when bound to the vaccine's aluminum adjuvant. Pathologist Dr. Soo Han Lee discovered high levels of HPV DNA in vaccines in 2011. These DNA fragments can activate the immune system, potentially leading to autoimmune disorders like POTS, and in rare cases, death. Internal emails allegedly show Merck downplayed the risks and tried to convince regulators not to test for HPV DNA. Merck's chief medical officer admitted they never looked for HPV DNA in their vaccine, instead using flawed testing methods. The lawsuit raises questions about regulatory oversight and Dr. Lee is set to testify in February. The speaker advocates for transparency, thorough safety studies, and informed consent regarding vaccines.

According to the speaker, Pfizer documents reveal that one month after the vaccine rollout in November 2020, Pfizer knew the vaccines didn't stop COVID and identified vaccine failure. Within months, the company allegedly needed to hire 2,400 staffers to process adverse event reports. The speaker claims Pfizer knew in May 2021 that the vaccines caused heart damage in 35 minors within a week of injection, but this information wasn't shared with parents until August 2021. The speaker alleges that the CDC initially stated the injection materials stayed in the injection site, but Pfizer knew these materials biodistribute throughout the body within 48 hours, settling in the brain, liver, adrenals, spleen, and ovaries. The speaker asserts that there is no mechanism for the body to eliminate lipid nanoparticles from the ovaries, leading to accumulation with each injection.

I recently heard stories of people losing their children to Pfizer injections, some experiencing immediate or gruesome deaths. The FDA knew about potential risks like cancer from as far back as 2013, but suddenly in 2020, these concerns were ignored. This seems like a premeditated crime, with regulators aware of the dangers. Military involvement in pushing these products is suspicious.

We found that the FDA lied about a maternal rat study that was testing the safety of mandating a vaccine to pregnant women. In every litter, individual pups had horrible bone deformities. This signal was extremely prominent. Moderna submitted the rat study, as they were required to do. The FDA then lied about the study results by claiming there were no problems. It was a huge enterprise in lying.

The speaker believes the accumulation of lipid nanoparticles in the ovaries following mRNA product administration was intentional, not accidental. mRNA products from Moderna and Pfizer BioNTech are encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles for structure and slow release. However, these nanoparticles are known to accumulate in the ovaries of every species tested. The speaker claims this formulation was chosen with the full knowledge that it would accumulate in the ovaries of girls and women, and that this has happened to every female administered the material.

In a review of data from 2020 to February 2023, one speaker reports that their miscarriage rate increased by 100% from year to year. The speaker states that in 2020, the miscarriage rate in their practice was about 4% on average, then rose to 7-8% in 2021, and 15% in 2022. In February 2023, the miscarriage rate was 25% in their practice. The speaker notes a decline in newly registered first-trimester patients, suggesting possible infertility. They believe that something is happening globally, and the only global event in 2021 was the introduction of injections. Approximately 65-70% of Floridians received at least two injections, according to CDC data. In February 2022, 65% of the speaker's pregnant patients had at least two injections. The speaker believes these injections should be considered category X and are dangerous for pregnant women, citing FOIA request information indicating harm and no benefit.

The speaker asserts that the Pfizer documents reveal the greatest crime against humanity in recorded history and that the documents focus specifically on destroying reproduction. They claim that Pfizer knew they were blocking women's ovaries with lipid nanoparticles and that these nanoparticles traversed the placenta. They contend the deaths of fetuses were due to maternal exposure to the vaccine, described as “maternal exposure quote unquote to the vaccine.” The speaker states that vaccinated women who were nursing their babies were making the babies sick, citing charts showing thousands of babies vomiting, thousands with edema (swollen flesh), and thousands with convulsions. They claim one baby died of multi-organ system failure from nursing vaccinated moms. They further assert that, to this day, in places like the Netherlands and across Europe and the world, vaccinated moms are not being told they can risk their babies’ lives by nursing them. The speaker alleges Pfizer knew these risks and references a section of the Pfizer documents noting an over eighty percent spontaneous abortion or miscarriage rate. They further claim Pfizer knows there is something in the semen of vaccinated men that is possibly dangerous to women or fetuses, because they warn vaccinated men not to have intercourse with childbearing-age women and to use “two reliable forms of contraception.” They assert that the injection doesn’t stay at the injection site but travels throughout the body within forty-eight hours, accumulating in the adrenals, the spleen, the lymphatic system, and the liver, crossing the blood-brain barrier to cause brain-damage-type reactions, and accumulating in the ovaries. They claim it is damaging the hearts of minors and reference FOIA documents from the White House, noting a scramble in April 2021 to cover this up. The speaker concludes that the shots were propagated to parents during that summer and into the next year, advocating for vaccinating minors while knowing they were injuring or killing them. They describe the actions as ongoing dissemination and promotion of vaccination for minors despite the asserted harms.

Lauren discusses post-SSRI sexual dysfunction (PSSD), a condition that can create lasting effects long after stopping antidepressants. She notes that sexual side effects are common with SSRIs, affecting about 50 to 70 percent of patients, and emphasizes that these effects can be permanent even after the last dose. PSSD is described not merely as low libido but as a full nervous system injury that can cause permanent, neurologically driven loss of sexual function. The hallmark symptom is genital numbness, with Lauren sharing that she has no sensation in her genitals and internal areas, describing her clitoris as completely numb. She explains that sufferers may permanently lose the ability to orgasm and experience a total loss of libido, often accompanied by a sudden onset of chemical asexuality that does not resolve. She frames PSSD as a form of chemical castration that is permanent, and she asserts it also involves emotional changes for some people, not just sexual dysfunction. Lauren describes the impact on her emotional life, saying she lost the ability to feel love for her mother, connect with friends, or experience pleasure in music. She characterizes these changes as a dramatic and disorienting severing of previous emotional and artistic capacities. She argues that sex and love are central human experiences, and removing the ability to participate in them is profoundly harmful. She links these experiences to broader concerns about pharmaceutical impact, alleging that Eli Lilly knew about potential permanent sexual dysfunction and emotional numbness in children but withheld this information from the public due to potential effects on profits. She states that the drug label does not mention PSSD or its risks, and she had no way of knowing this could happen. She recounts that the FDA received a citizen’s petition in 2018 asking for the risk to be added to labels, but it was ignored. Lauren shares that she took Zoloft in 2022 and argues that if the risk had been acknowledged, she would have accessed alternatives and avoided suffering she describes as inhumane. She mentions reports among leading sexual medicine doctors of genitourinary fibrosis similar to cardiovascular conditions in elderly patients, and asserts she would have avoided the medication had she known of these risks. Looking forward, Lauren expresses hope that the current administration will address these failures, recognize PSSD in more countries, and allocate funding to research its causes and potential reversibility. She stresses that losing sexual and emotional function has driven some young people to end their lives, underscoring the urgency of finding a road back to life for those affected. She calls on the press and public to listen with an open mind to the experiences of those harmed by these medications, and she emphasizes that people trusted the medical system and deserve truthful information and support.

**Italiano:** Un'indagine biennale condotta da giornaliste mediche rivela che la FDA statunitense ha approvato centinaia di farmaci senza prove di efficacia, e talvolta nonostante prove di dannosità. Su oltre 400 approvazioni tra il 2013 e il 2022, il 73% non soddisfaceva i criteri fondamentali per l'efficacia, come gruppi di controllo e studi replicati. La FDA ha spesso optato per percorsi accelerati, ma molti studi di follow-up non vengono completati o non dimostrano l'efficacia. Più della metà delle approvazioni si basava su dati preliminari. In oncologia, solo 3 farmaci su 123 hanno soddisfatto tutti gli standard. Esempi includono Kopictra, che ha ridotto la sopravvivenza, e Elmiron, ancora in commercio nonostante la mancanza di efficacia e gravi effetti collaterali. Tra il 2018 e il 2021, sono stati spesi miliardi per farmaci con studi di follow-up incompleti. Si stima che 128.000 americani muoiano ogni anno a causa di farmaci prescritti correttamente. Molti medici non comprendono il processo di approvazione della FDA. Si evidenzia la dipendenza dell'agenzia dai finanziamenti dell'industria farmaceutica. **English Translation:** A two-year investigation by medical journalists reveals that the U.S. FDA has approved hundreds of drugs without proof of efficacy, and sometimes despite evidence of harm. Of over 400 approvals between 2013 and 2022, 73% did not meet fundamental efficacy criteria, such as control groups and replicated studies. The FDA has often opted for accelerated pathways, but many follow-up studies are not completed or do not demonstrate efficacy. More than half of approvals were based on preliminary data. In oncology, only 3 out of 123 drugs met all standards. Examples include Kopictra, which reduced survival, and Elmiron, still on the market despite lack of efficacy and serious side effects. Between 2018 and 2021, billions were spent on drugs with incomplete follow-up studies. An estimated 128,000 Americans die each year from correctly prescribed drugs. Many doctors do not understand the FDA approval process. The agency's dependence on pharmaceutical industry funding is highlighted.

I recently met someone whose 18-year-old daughter developed cancer after receiving the Pfizer vaccine. I've heard from many parents who lost children to these injections, some experiencing immediate and horrific deaths. They repeatedly share their stories with lawmakers, highlighting a significant crime that must end. The FDA was aware of the potential cancer risks associated with these vaccines, as outlined in guidance documents from 2013 and 2015. These documents instructed manufacturers to study risks like cancer, fertility issues, and cardiovascular problems, and deemed it unethical to test on healthy volunteers. Yet, by 2020, these concerns were seemingly overlooked. This raises serious suspicions about the intentions behind the vaccine rollout, suggesting a premeditated crime where regulators and the military may have colluded with pharmaceutical companies.

A spreadsheet showing tens of thousands of women allegedly damaged menstrually by the injection was created. According to the speaker, the spreadsheet showed 15,000 women bleeding every day, 10,000 bleeding twice a month, and 7,500 with no periods at all. The speaker claims 10-year-old girls bled upon injection, and 85-year-old women bled. The speaker states this chart went to the White House, Dr. Walensky, the FDA, POTUS, and 15 White House staffers on 04/20/2021. Three days later, Dr. Walensky allegedly told women there's no bad time to get the Pfizer or COVID injection before, during, or after pregnancy. The speaker claims that while Pfizer's trials proved the shot destroyed women's menstrual cycles, they were simultaneously developing a product for women with excessive menstrual bleeding. This product was allegedly rolled out one month after the report went to the White House.

The speakers discuss the vaccination landscape around human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines, focusing on a controversial issue they claim has been known and disseminated since early on: contamination with DNA (DNA residuals) from Deinococcus or related genetic material in vaccines and the implications of aluminum adjuvants used in Gardasil/Gardasil 9. - They begin by asserting that HPV vaccines, including Gardasil/Sil, have been the subject of remarkable legal actions worldwide, including four major lawsuits in Japan. They note that historically, in Japan, many young women and girls stood as plaintiffs, and that the core problem they highlight is the DNA contamination issue (referred to as “ディー エ ヌ エー 混 入 汚 染 問 題”). - The claim is that from early on, the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and others acknowledged this contamination as central. They reference a 2012 paper that reportedly made the DNA contamination problem very clear, naming pathogens such as Human Papillomavirus, HPV, and DEIN? They describe that vaccine particles (HBV? HPBL DNA fragments) were found to be directly bound to aluminum adjuvant particles in Gardasil, implying a mechanism by which residual DNA could be involved in adverse effects. - The speakers say that the 2012 study, and subsequent work, led to attention from doctors worldwide who listened to the voices of women and girls and wondered what was happening with the vaccine recipients. They claim that samples showed that residual HPV DNA fragments were consistently present and directly linked to aluminum adjuvant particles, and that “PCR” detection indicated the same DNA sequences across samples. They mention that the 2012 paper’s findings were followed by reporting that, by 2014, vaccination had been suspended in Japan earlier than many would have expected. - They recount a process in which major scientists from various countries (France, the UK, and others) were involved in investigating adenoviral or genetic components (they reference Shihan? and others) and that the Japan-based researchers, including Ishii Ken, were central figures. They describe meetings, PowerPoint presentations at a hotel, and a sequence of visits to the UK and the US (including HR-related planning with U.S. FDA and the UK authorities) that were interrupted by closures in the Obama era, leading to documentation and discussions about the safety concerns. - The speakers claim that by the 2012 report and again by 2014, all vaccine samples from multiple countries contained residual DNA, and that Japan became a hub for disseminating awareness of these issues globally. They state that the issue was present not only in the early Gardasil (Gardasil-4) but also in later forms, with references to Gardasil-9 and the idea that the DNA contamination and adjuvant interactions could contribute to immune and neurological symptoms in recipients, particularly in women and girls. - They discuss changes to WHO and FDA guidelines on residual DNA limits, noting a progression from 10 picograms to higher thresholds over time, implying corporate interests in allowing higher residual DNA quantities in vaccines. They emphasize that the shift in limits is tied to pharmaceutical companies’ needs, not human biology changes, and argue that Japan highlighted the problem of Deinance-DNA contamination during the cervical cancer vaccine era, signaling that researchers, journalists, and victims were aware long before others. - Finally, Speaker 1 adds that two points became clear a year earlier: the disruption of messenger RNA–type vaccines as a response to safety concerns, and the subsequent rise in adverse outcomes after widespread vaccination, including deaths, which they claim intensified opposition to these vaccines. Note: The summary presents the speakers' claims and sequencing of events as described in the transcript without evaluation or endorsement.

Birth control is the "absolute worst thing ever" for young girls, even as young as 11, 12, and 13. Birth control doesn't regulate hormones; it puts women into a pseudo-menopause state with flat hormone levels. The speaker claims that if birth control is not needed for contraception, there is no benefit to it. Some clients share negative stories about coming off birth control, expressing anger at being put on it without full understanding. Women with difficult or heavy periods may seek birth control for relief, but this is not a solution. It is unhealthy for young women to have the hormone levels of a 55-year-old. The speaker questions the long-term effects on women who start birth control as teenagers and stay on it for decades.

Accutane is described as a “poisonous medication” linked to abortions. The transcript claims that in April 1988 the FDA released Accutane as a new drug, and that it caused one thousand spontaneous abortions, with seven thousand other abortions and additional side effects including joint aches, drying of the skin, and severe hair loss. It also claims that Hoffman LaRoche, who ran the FDA, stopped allowing women to participate in studies because the women were having spontaneous abortions, and that the company requested that women not be allowed into the studies anymore. The transcript asserts that studies are biased and written by drug companies to present different results, and contrasts a stated claim of a “thirty percent reduction in acne” with the reported abortion and hair-loss side effects. The transcript further claims that the company continued pushing Accutane forward despite being aware of serious side effects. It then alleges that Congressman Ted Weiss demanded in 1988 that a criminal investigation be launched against forty deaths caused by Accutane, and reiterates that it is described as killing people while causing abortions and hair loss. The speaker says Accutane is still being sold “to this day.” The transcript concludes with a broader claim that the medical system is protected and “poisons people on a regular basis,” and expresses outrage at the idea of people being prescribed Accutane. It argues that acne could instead be addressed through lifestyle and natural approaches, listing examples such as eating healthy, cleaning up skincare products, cleaning up water, using “dragon’s blood,” using “natural lotions,” using tallow, and eating raw eggs. The transcript closes by stating that, instead of these alternatives, people are prescribed Accutane to “cull the population.”

Pfizer knew a month into the rollout, November 2020, that this vaccine did not work to stop COVID. Everything that followed—the mandates, the lost jobs, the closures, children not allowed back to school if they didn’t take the shot, the armed forces compelled to take it, pilots compelled—was built on a lie of vaccine efficacy. The most common side effect of getting vaccinated is COVID, and Pfizer understood that the vaccine’s efficacy and vaccine failure showed it did not stop COVID. They also knew the injection did not stay in the deltoid. Europeans through the EMA and public health entities described side effects as chills, fever, fatigue, needing to lie down, but Pfizer knew that was a lie. In Pfizer documents, charts show that the materials—the spike protein, the mRNA, the lipid nanoparticles, and polyethylene glycol—biodistribute within forty-eight hours and leave the injection site to biodistribute to major organs throughout the body, crossing the blood-brain barrier. This may have contributed to personality changes in some loved ones who took the injection. They also accumulate in the liver, the adrenals, the spleen, the lymphatic system, and in women, the ovaries. The first injection accumulates in ovaries; the second injection more so. Experts could not find any mechanism whereby this material left the body in either gender. By the first booster, surgeries on vaccinated women reported fully blocked ovaries, among other damage. Pfizer knew that. They also hired 2,400 full-time staff to process reports of serious adverse events, starting to receive them during the 2020-2021 period. In Pfizer documents, over forty-two thousand serious adverse events were tallied from November 2020 to February 2021, with many individuals experiencing multiple events. The top documented side effects included myalgia (muscle pain), followed by joint pain, then COVID itself, and then a catastrophic tally of serious side effects including heart damage (myocarditis, pericarditis), problems with the aorta, thrombotic events (blood clots in various locations), neurological events (tremors, Guillain-Barré, dementia, epilepsy-like seizures), autoimmune disorders, and eye damage including blindness. Reproductive damage was noted: miscarriages and other issues. Twelve hundred deaths in three months were recorded as not statistically random; they were old with prior conditions, yet doctors noted causality concerns and recorded them. Pfizer knew by April 2021 that minors were injured by the vaccine, specifically myocarditis and pericarditis. Minors sustained heart damage, with thirty-five minors affected. The Israeli Ministry of Health warned the CDC and the Biden administration about minor heart damage, but FOIA requests later showed active conversations up to the White House regarding myocarditis in minors. Instead of withdrawing or advising parents, a 17-page document was produced as a script to persuade parents to vaccinate their minors, supplemented by a TikTok influencer campaign encouraging young people to get injected. These communications indicated that kids would sustain deadly heart damage, and still proceeded. Senator Ron Johnson is using the work to unredact those documents and hold hearings about the cover-up. Pfizer knew all of these things.

A Pfizer whistleblower within the company released documents showing that there were over 158,000 reports of adverse reactions from 12/01/2020 through 02/28/2021. The reports include serious adverse reactions and spontaneous abortions. The whistleblower states that the FDA was well aware and wanted these documents hidden for seventy five years. According to the speaker, the documents prove that the adverse events were intentionally released and that officials knew all along that the vaccine was going to cause massive heart attacks and strokes and deaths and infertility and miscarriages. The speaker claims the list of adverse effects goes on, including neurological issues, and questions how this vaccine remains on the market, noting that vaccines have been removed where ten cases of a child getting sick occurred. The speaker describes the situation as evil, intentional, and asserts that those involved must be held accountable.

The speaker reveals that a vaccine funded by the WHO was discovered to be a fertility regulating vaccine. It was used without women's knowledge in South America in 1993. The vaccine caused idiopathic infertility, irregular periods, failed pregnancies, threatened abortions, premature labor, and other complications. These findings suggest a sinister agenda behind the vaccine's use.

Speaker 0 discusses the idea that doctors will say a preservative-free form is not necessarily safe. The claim is that a preservative-free label does not guarantee safety. The discussion then focuses on Polysorbate eighty (Polysorbate 80). It is stated that there are ten milligrams of Polysorbate eighty in the preparation being discussed. Polysorbate eighty is described as being used in research studies, particularly in cancer research for brain cancer drugs, because it is used to compare the drug with Polysorbate eighty and because it “opens up the blood brain barrier” which helps the drug get into the brain. The speaker asserts that Polysorbate eighty does the same thing when administered to babies, enabling the blood-brain barrier to be opened, and then, immediately after that, the hepatitis B vaccine is given with two hundred fifty micrograms of aluminum. The aluminum is said to have access to the brain immediately because of the Polysorbate eighty that is in the vitamin K shot. The speaker references a 2016 statement of concern about Gardasil, noting that Gardasil injections at that time contained fifty micrograms of Polysorbate eighty, and there was concern about polysorbate eighty causing premature ovarian failure. The claim is that polygsorbate eighty is used in clinical studies to induce infertility. The discussion then contrasts the amounts: when the vitamin K shot is injected, Amphastar has ten milligrams of Polysorbate eighty. So the concern is that there is a comparison between fifty micrograms in Gardasil and ten milligrams (which is two hundred times that amount). This discrepancy raises the question posed by the speaker: is the vitamin K shot a factor in the infertility problems that are claimed to be occurring in young people today?