TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0, Speaker 1, and Speaker 2 discuss Dominion’s access to election systems during the 2020 election period in Georgia, with Gwinnett County cited as a specific example. The dialogue confirms that the questioning period was during the 2020 election, and the focus is on whether Dominion remotely accessed election systems and whether such access occurred in Georgia. Speaker 2 asks if there is any indication of nonelection personnel remotely accessing a Dominion system. Speaker 3 responds that they have reviewed a series of emails produced by Dominion in which they’re discussing remoting into Gwinnett County, Georgia. Speaker 1 then notes that Speaker 0 had mentioned Dominion remote collection or connection to election systems but lacks evidence that it occurred in Georgia. Speaker 0 asserts that there was one county and that they have seen many Dominion emails, requiring translation from Serbian to English to verify technical questions and translations. Speaker 1 asks specifically: “So it's your testimony that there is evidence of dominion remotely accessing Georgia election equipment?” Speaker 0 answers: “Yes, on the one county. It was included with stuff that I was researching and reading through considering Colorado. Michigan was also involved and there were other ones.” Speaker 2 inquires about Dominion’s ability to remotely connect to these election systems and whether they could do so without detection. Speaker 0 responds: “Yes.” Speaker 2 then asks if the interviewee is aware of any instances in which that has occurred, and Speaker 0 confirms: “One would be the Denver, Colorado server was granted or requested to grant Belgrave, Only Belgrade. Did search. There is a Belgrade Montana.” The speaker questions why Montana would need to connect to a Colorado file transfer server as part of the election system, noting there are other components and things done in the background concerning the database and the configuration of the database server that still do not have an engineering change order. Speaker 0 explains that in operational environments, things sometimes break and need fixing, leading to the submission of a change request or, in this case, an engineering change order that is retroactive. The goal is to record the process to ensure change management and integrity of the system. If changes are not recorded, it leads to a bad situation, according to Speaker 0.

At some point, there is a correlation between the purging of the database and the date of the audit. They both happen almost at the same time, the day before the audit. This connection requires an explanation.

I was invited to investigate the Mesa County server to compare the before and after images. I wanted to test the system's security, so I used a backdoor utility called SQL Server Management Studio, which is not certified software and should not be on a voting machine. I quickly accessed the presidential election results in Mesa County, showing Biden with 31,000 votes and Trump with 56,000 votes. I will explain later how easily I could manipulate the election results if I wanted to.

Christy has access to the server room, and we need to send her name there. The server logs reveal Brian's involvement, and there's a significant database that I expected to find. Brian is a valuable team member despite any criticism. We see Christy interacting with the logs and deleting entries. She is granting Brian access to the server, and I’m monitoring the console. At this point, Christy is not in the room, but she is coordinating with others. This situation raises concerns as multiple people are nearby, indicating potential issues.

The speakers discuss allegations about Brian Gamble and his wife in relation to Project Veritas. Speaker 0 says Reba claimed that Brian Gamble's wife worked with Project Veritas and that she was a honeypot with them, along with Brian Gamble. Speaker 1 confirms, stating, “Oh, yes, she does. 100%. She works with Project Veritas. She's a honeypot with them. Her and Brian Gamble.” He also mentions a social media reference: Vincent Kennedy posted a picture of a pineapple upside down getting eaten by a gorilla, and notes that Loco Lobo posted about it, adding, “the upside upside down pineapple signifies that somebody's a swinger.” He then says, “Brian Gamble's okay with his wife going out on dates with these guys to obtain information from Project Veritas. Is that kosher? Like, would you let your wife do that? And Brian Gamble, as we all know, wants to have parties and get with the babes, you know, the fucking Botox babes and their plastic faces. Fuck them.” Speaker 2 adds, “Well, the record show that Brian Gamble, who was the CIO of the America Project with Joe Flynn and Mike Flynn, his wife, is a honeypot for Project Veritas. Okay. Just let the record show.” Speaker 0 says, “I will.”

I found a video where the speaker goes through some server logs and discovers a database issue. They mention finding different forensics related to it. They also mention a person named Christy, who seems to be active in the GMC community.

Speaker 0 recounts discovering a secret SCIF on campus, a secure facility with files nobody knew existed. An employee walked by a door, inquiries were made, the room was entered, and individuals were found working there with secret files on controversial topics. Those files have been turned over to attorneys and the speaker is pursuing what happened. The speaker notes that Customs and Border Protection (CBP) knows every traveler entering the country and every good that comes in, and they assess and collect tariffs. They highlight that information about travelers during COVID was with national labs under the speaker’s jurisdiction, and that scientists at those labs participated with the Wuhan lab. The speaker claims these scientists traveled back and forth between each other and worked on those experiments, describing this as eye-opening. Addressing Elon and his team, the speaker says they were extremely helpful since the speaker’s arrival in office, assisting in identifying a troubling issue: some of the speaker’s own department employees had downloaded software on the speaker’s phone and laptop to spy on them and record meetings. The speaker states that this had happened to several politicians and notes that bringing in technology experts helped reveal this software; without examining laptops and phones, the activity would still be ongoing. The speaker emphasizes a need to continue partnering with technology companies and experts to bring them in for assistance, as government work—especially within the department under the speaker’s jurisdiction—has been neglected and lagging behind what it should be. The speaker recalls that in the first four months, they couldn’t even email a PowerPoint from Department of Homeland Security servers if it was longer than six pages, illustrating what they view as backwards thinking that hindered national security. The speaker reflects on the concept of a deep state, admitting that they previously believed it existed but didn’t realize how severe it was. They describe daily efforts to uncover individuals who do not love America and who work within the Department and across the federal government. The overall message conveys uncovering secrecy, internal surveillance concerns, cross-agency connections involving CBP and national labs, collaboration with tech experts, and a strong critique of past departmental conduct and systemic protection failures.

On 2/11, 462 log entries were overwritten by a script. On 3rd March, 37,686 log entries were overwritten by the same script. The day before we received the system, 330 log entries were overwritten by that script. The EMS admin account was responsible for this. The challenge is that this occurred before an audit, and it deleted all the records and files related to the election. Someone deliberately ran a program to clear all the records in the system used for generating the official results.

On various dates, an individual ran a script to find blank passwords for the accounts on the system. The script was executed multiple times, overwriting a significant number of log entries. The EMS admin account was responsible for this, but due to the lack of accountability in assigning the username, it is difficult to prove who exactly did it. Fortunately, historical data from MTech video feeds helped identify the individuals at the keyboards during those times. However, their names will not be released to protect them from scrutiny and potential impacts.

Dominion can remotely connect to election systems without detection. This has occurred in instances such as the Denver, Colorado server, which was requested to grant access to Belgrade. It is unclear why Belgrade, possibly Belgrade, Montana, would need to connect to a Colorado file transfer server for an election system. There were also background activities concerning the database and its configuration that lack an engineering change order.

Christy accesses the server room and introduces Brian, a new forensics expert. She shows him the server logs and points out the deletion of certain logs. They discuss the importance of investigating further and mention the presence of other individuals. The video ends with a mention of someone named Matt.

The speaker reviewed server logs and identified "Brian." The speaker found a database in the next vendor and new forensics. Christy is mentioned in connection to a server. The speaker shows access and a deletion on the log from the database. A previous tweet shows Christy letting Brian into the server. The speaker repeats "Here he is" multiple times. The speaker mentions another law proposal and altering.

The speakers assert that there is evidence of direct access to the Antrim County election management system (EMS). In the forensic images, they note that on November 5 an anonymous user logged onto the EMS remotely and performed actions with escalated privileges, making changes to the database during attempts to retabulate the election. They describe this as a major development, because it demonstrates that the machines were accessed remotely, and crucially, that the remote access was by an anonymous user who possessed elevated privileges within the system. They present this as a significant point for those who oppose forensic auditing or who are against non-forensic reviews. They also reference visible features on ballots, specifically the black boxes along the side of the ballot. The ballots reportedly contain 59 of these black boxes. In the forensic images, they indicate that certain blocks—numbers 15, 18, 28, 41, and 44—were intentionally modified. The described modifications concerned the height, width, and overall shape of these blocks, with the stated purpose of generating errors. Regarding the consequences of these modifications, the narrative claims that by altering these specific blocks, errors were created that led to rejections of Republican ballots. In other words, ballots cast for Donald Trump that were processed through the machine allegedly faced a higher likelihood of being rejected due to these block modifications. The asserted outcome is that such ballots were rejected at a rate of 20% more than ballots cast for Joe Biden.

The speaker reviewed server logs and identified "Brian." The speaker found forensics in a database. The speaker shows access and a deletion on the log from the database. The speaker claims Christy previously tweeted about letting Brian into the server. The speaker repeats "Here he is" multiple times. The speaker mentions a law proposal.

The speaker mentions server logs and their own logs, and then reveals that someone named Christie is involved. They state that Christie is not the right driver for the medical situation and imply that it is being discussed online.

The Windows security logs were purged right before two audits were scheduled to begin. This makes it difficult to determine who had access to the RTR admin account, which is shared among all accounts. It is unclear why someone would delete all the records and files from the Dominion software, which is used for tallying and reporting election results, the day before an audit started.

On 2/11, 462 log entries were overwritten by a script. On 3rd March, 37,686 log entries were overwritten by the same script. On 12th, 330 log entries were overwritten. The EMS admin account is responsible for this. The challenge is that this occurred before an audit, which means the full context of the election is not available. The log file shows that someone purged all the results for the election, deleting all records and files. This happened right before the audit started.

A new statute was proposed to make it a misdemeanor to knowingly take classified information from secure systems. Our investigation also looked into possible computer intrusions by nation states or hostile actors. It's important to note that Secretary Clinton used multiple servers and administrators during her time at the state department.

On the left is the image before the Dominion employee arrived at the election management server, and on the right is the image after the employee left. The logs folder on the left is missing on the right, indicating that it disappeared after the employee left. Additionally, in the Inetpub log folder, there are multiple log files that contain evidence of connections to the web server. The number of log files is not mentioned.

On various dates, an individual ran a script to search for blank passwords on the system. This script overwrote a significant number of log entries. The EMS admin account was responsible, but it's difficult to prove who specifically executed the script due to the lack of accountability in assigning usernames. Fortunately, historical data from MTech video feeds allowed us to identify individuals at the keyboards during those times. However, we won't disclose their names due to the potential scrutiny and impact on them.

Here's the video everyone is talking about. We’re examining the server logs, and it turns out it’s Brian. We’ll look at a database that enhances our findings. Forensics play a crucial role here, especially with AT&T and the server. I’ll demonstrate the app access and the log deletion process. You all know the history behind this. This is another log we’re reviewing, likely related to daily activities, such as purchasing a truck.

There is a discussion about log files on two screens. One screen shows hundreds of log files from 2019 until May 22, 2021. The other screen only has three years of log files, which have mysteriously disappeared. It is mentioned that when a Dominion employee came in, the log files vanished. These files record all access to a specific machine. It is also mentioned that Dominion sent people around the country for software updates during that time. Some participants confirm this information.

In this video, the speaker talks about checking the server logs and finding something interesting. They discovered a database in their extended logs, which they believe is related to forensics. They mention someone named Christy, who is an active member of the GMC community.

I informed the social security office about the suspicious person. I mentioned it at the meeting. The student may have seen or been with him.

Speaker 0 expresses intense anger toward the Trump administration, saying: "I give a fuck about any fucking person in the Trump administration being upset with giving them oh, how dare you?" They claim others have "no fucking idea to list the bodies that we have" and suggest that if they were serial killers, it would be like "Mal or something." They urge everyone to become emotionally detached from their online personas and to create burner accounts to "unmask all of these traders" and to impose the "threat of IRL consequences" because people use anonymity to act behind privilege. They state that Twitter should no longer be a safe place for these individuals and propose that someone should interrupt leadership by saying, "yeah, boss. I I can't do this anymore." They argue the government should consider the impact on families: "My kids and my address just fucking wound up on this platform. How the fuck did they find out who I am?" They insist that every time those people log in, they need to have "second fucking thoughts" and be terrified. They assert that "Security clearances don't mean a goddamn thing to me" and declare, "I guarantee you I'm 10 times smarter than you and your fucking best bet." Speaker 1 interjects: "Back the up, juicy." Speaker 2 responds with distress: "I'm not a Spit on me again." They request to be kept away from the person and say, "This guy's intimidating me. He's pushing me." They ask, "Where's your vehicle?" and answer, "It's in the garage." They further ask, "Hey. What is your name? Are you working for the hotel?" and Speaker 0 says, "I'm working. Tell me. Are" before the scene cuts off. Overall, the excerpt presents a heated monologue urging aggressive online accountability and real-world consequences for certain individuals operating under anonymity, followed by interruptions that reveal a tense confrontation involving intimidation, personal threat concerns, and questions about a vehicle and employment.