reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Electric cars are expensive and will be used to control where people can and cannot go. Unlike traditional cars, autonomous electric cars will be computer-driven and will only take passengers where they are allowed to go. The goal is not to save the planet from climate change, but rather to impose control over people's movements. The idea is to replace petrol and diesel cars with electric ones in order to limit people's freedom and decide where they can travel. The claim of saving the planet is just an excuse.

In the future, instead of you know, I imagine that in the future, instead of a whole whole lot of people remote remotely monitoring air traffic control, there'll be a giant AI that's doing the remote control. And then only in the case of the giant AI can handle it, will a person come in to intercept. And so I think you see that these industries in the future, every industrial company will be an AI company. Or you're not going be an industrial company.

In the 20th government summit, we will use an app similar to Uber, but instead of calling a driver, a self-driven car will pick us up and take us to the airport. By 2030, Los Angeles aims to eliminate private car usage, reducing traffic and transforming highways into parks and public spaces.

In the future, the question of why we need so many humans will arise. The current answer seems to be keeping them content with drugs and computer games.

In ten years, brain implants could be commonplace, allowing individuals to directly sense others' reactions by measuring their brain waves.

Manual driving will be treated like smoking. Regulations will stack against you. Urban bans on human driving. Car culture will shrink but not die. Narrative manipulation will play a role. Think about that. So it's for your own good. You know? We're keeping everybody safe. That's why you aren't allowed to drive your car. Of course, they'll be able to restrict your freedom too. Right, Sean? I mean, they'll be able to say where you can go and when you can go there. And it's like, oh, you know, I wanna go take a nice trip with the family and go go past Area 51 and check out Roswell and say, no. Forbidden area. You can't go there. Sorry. And it takes you on another route.

In the 20th government summit, we will use an app similar to Uber to summon self-driving cars that will pick us up and take us to the airport. By 2030, Los Angeles plans to eliminate private car usage, which will reduce traffic and allow for the transformation of highways into parks and public spaces.

In the near future, we will enter the exponential phase, driven by advancements in artificial intelligence, the metaverse, space technologies, and synthetic biology. These technologies will revolutionize our lives, making them completely different from what they are now. Those who become proficient in these areas will have the power to shape the world.

"So what happens if, you know, all drivers go away?" "As humans were driving, you can work a twelve hour shift." "It will be 100% robotic, which means all of those workers are going away." "Every Amazon worker, all those jobs, UPS, gone, FedEx, gone." "And when you order something, it's gonna come faster and cheaper and better." "And your Uber will be half as much, but somebody needs to retrain these people." "The question is, what happens to those people who get caught in the gap?" "before 02/1930, you're going to see Amazon, which has massively invested in this, replace all factory workers and all drivers." "All of those are gonna be gone and those companies will be more profitable."

Speaker 0 presents a critical view of “fifteen minute cities,” arguing the goal is to corral people into an area where they can be easily surveilled and controlled. The speaker contends the central interest is how a small, ruling elite can govern the many forever without the many ever being able to complain or act. The result, they claim, is a global governance project that uses big tech and mass surveillance to create a new way of life and system of living, with a particular aim of reducing the share of wealth or resources held by the many—the 99 or so. The speaker connects these ideas to the COVID era, suggesting that groups like the World Economic Forum (WEF) popularized policies framed as sustainability but ultimately designed and implemented to limit ownership and control by individuals. Specifically, the speaker cites WEF proposals such as not owning cars—renting them instead—and the deployment of autonomous fleets to drive people around within a defined radius. They also note proposals around not owning homes but renting and sharing apartments when unoccupied. A concrete example given is the Columbus smart city initiative tied to the Columbus Partnership, which Wexner chaired for roughly twenty years (2001–2021). The speaker notes that Columbus received a large Department of Transportation grant and private funding, possibly from Wexner, to implement a system where private car ownership would disappear in favor of fleets of autonomous vehicles. In this system, the autonomous cars would determine where people go, with specific routes available for payment and use. The speaker references the National Security Commission on AI, chaired by Eric Schmidt of Google, which reportedly described, as part of a strategy to beat China in AI, the need to end private car ownership in the United States and replace it with autonomous fleets (Waymo-like) guided by AI to manage where people go and work, implying a nationwide shift toward centralized planning of mobility. Finally, the speaker connects these initiatives to the Technocracy Inc. model, noting influence from Taylorism and industrial-revolution-era thinking that prioritized efficiency and micromanagement. The implication is that the new systems aim to extract data and monetize daily life, elevating efficiency and control above individual autonomy.

An automobile has really represented freedom. 'Freedom to go wherever the heck you want, whenever you want.' Yeah. And the politicians have hated it from day one. You know? 'It's like it's too hard to control a population that's free to do whatever they want.' Here here's what said narrative manipulation will play a role. The media will portray manual drivers as dangerous or selfish as they once did with anti maskers. Expect op eds like, why letting grandpa drive as a threat to public safety, or should you be allowed to drive when AI can do it safer? Yeah.

"We tend to think of the in the paradigm of yesterday." "So first, we would say, here's a car. Let's put an electric engine into it. Oh, let's make this car self driving." "But if it's the same car in a road that is completely congested, it doesn't matter whether this car is autonomous or electric or whatever, you still don't get anywhere." "So this is why we talk about mobility because, actually, if you can get people to share a car, you can take out, I mean, a lot of cars in the streets." "Think of Singapore where they looked at how they could bring it down to about 40% of the cars if we would use them smarter." "And I think it's very important that we do not just try to fix yesterday's paradigm, but think about how do we want a city to move."

We need to address mass unemployment with universal basic income as machines take over jobs globally. Robots will outperform humans in most jobs, making it essential to provide income to the unemployed.

A new class of people may become obsolete as computers excel in various fields, potentially rendering humans unnecessary. The key question of the future will be the role of humans in a world dominated by machines. The current solution seems to be keeping people content with drugs and video games.

There will come a time when jobs may not be necessary, as AI will be capable of handling all tasks. People may choose to work for personal satisfaction rather than necessity. This future presents both opportunities and challenges, particularly in finding the right approach to harness AI's potential. Instead of universal basic income, we might see universal high income, creating a more equal society where everyone has access to this advanced technology. Education will benefit greatly, as AI can serve as an ideal, patient tutor. Overall, we could enter an age of abundance with no shortage of goods and services.

I think they will want to implant smartphone technology into our bodies in the future.

By around 2030, the smartphone as we know it today will not be the usual kind of the most common interface; many of these things will be built directly into our bodies.

I have a Tesla. I got it because it's a cool car. Nothing to do with its green aspirations, which I don't buy into anyways. But in The US, the largest segment of employment in The United States is driver. And the FSD is to the point now, it will be within the next six months, it's gonna eliminate over time all of those jobs. When I asked AI about it, it said in ten years, you will be perceived as a, an insane person for wanting to drive your own car, and you'll be banished. Driving is just like, forget it, unless you live in an inner city and you take mass transit all over. But for most of us in the world here in North America, driving is fundamental to our day to day existence.

Tesla is currently leading in self-driving car technology. However, it is predicted that all cars will eventually need to have autonomous capabilities. This is because self-driving cars are safer, more convenient, and more enjoyable to use.

In the 20th governance summit, I bet that you will use an app similar to Uber. Instead of calling a driver, a self-driven car will automatically pick you up from your location and take you to the airport. The mayor of Los Angeles mentioned that by 2030, the city will be free of private cars, which will enable the transformation of highways into parks and public spaces.