reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Members of the German Bundestag will vote on five proposals regarding a general vaccination mandate. However, it is important to consider the following points. The Covid-19 vaccines are not safe, as the Paul Ehrlich Institute has received more relevant side effect reports in the past twelve months than for all other vaccines in the last twenty years combined. Additionally, these vaccines no longer provide significant self-protection or protection against the Omicron variant. Therefore, they are only beneficial for certain high-risk patients. Overall, this means that a vaccination mandate is unnecessary, inappropriate, and unconstitutional. Every patient should have the right to freely decide for or against vaccination after receiving individual counseling.

I, along with six colleagues, wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) expressing concerns about the COVID vaccines. The EMA responded, revealing shocking facts. They clarified that the vaccines were only approved for individual immunization, not for controlling or preventing infections. The EMA emphasized the lack of data on contagiousness and even stated that repeated exposure to the virus could increase the risk of infection in vaccinated individuals. The government's campaigns promoting vaccination to protect others were unauthorized and based on misinformation. The EMA also highlighted the importance of carefully considering safety information before administering vaccines. The government's failure to report vaccine side effects within the first 14 days was not only fraudulent but also endangered lives. The vaccination campaign should be halted as it does not meet EMA standards. The government and supporting political parties should be held accountable for their lies and deception.

Um das Vertrauen in die öffentliche Gesundheit wiederzugewinnen, müssen wir uns von den Interessen der Pharmaindustrie distanzieren. In den letzten vier Jahren haben wir gesehen, dass Desinformation vor allem von der EU-Kommission und nationalen Regierungen kam, nicht aus dem Internet. Es ging nicht darum, die Pandemie zu bekämpfen, sondern die Menschen politisch zu kontrollieren. Während wir Schwierigkeiten hatten, grundlegende Medikamente zu beschaffen, wurden 4,6 Milliarden Impfdosen bestellt, die weder sicher noch effektiv waren. Die Bürger wurden unter Druck gesetzt, sich impfen zu lassen, obwohl die Impfungen keine Übertragung verhinderten. Studien zeigen einen Zusammenhang zwischen Impfstatus und Geburtenrückgang in den Mitgliedstaaten. Es ist unsere Aufgabe, diese Zusammenhänge zu untersuchen, um glaubwürdig für die öffentliche Gesundheit einzutreten. --- To regain trust in public health, we must distance ourselves from pharmaceutical interests. Over the past four years, misinformation primarily came from the EU Commission and national governments, not the internet. The focus was not on combating the pandemic but on controlling people politically. While we struggled to procure basic medications, 4.6 billion vaccine doses were ordered that were neither safe nor effective. Citizens were pressured to get vaccinated, even though the vaccines did not prevent transmission. Studies show a correlation between vaccination status and declining birth rates in member states. It is our duty to investigate these connections to advocate credibly for public health.

Frau von der Leyen, your tenure has been a disgrace to democracy. Your policies, including the Green Deal and Fit for 55, have devastated the lives of EU citizens, leading to deindustrialization, soaring prices, and the erosion of freedom and democracy. You should be ashamed. You negotiated a billion-dollar contract with Pfizer for a product that has proven to be, at best, ineffective and, at worst, harmful or even deadly. Recently, the European Court of Justice ruled that you should not have kept the vaccine contract details secret. You are under investigation for corruption, and if you had any integrity, you would step down. But integrity seems to be lacking in you. You are the Commission President, not a symbol of corruption. --- Mrs. von der Leyen, your tenure has been a disgrace to democracy. Your policies have devastated EU citizens' lives, leading to deindustrialization, soaring prices, and the erosion of freedom. You should be ashamed. You negotiated a billion-dollar contract with Pfizer for a product that has proven ineffective or harmful. The European Court of Justice ruled that you should not have kept the vaccine contract details secret. You are under investigation for corruption, and if you had integrity, you would step down. But integrity seems to be lacking in you. You are the Commission President, not a symbol of corruption.

Wir hatten in Deutschland im Jahr 2020 historisch niedrige Krankenhausbelegungen und keine außergewöhnlichen Atemwegserkrankungen. Die Sterblichkeit stieg erst 2021 an. Schweden schnitt ohne Masken und Lockdowns besser ab. Die Politik reagierte mit übertriebenen Maßnahmen, isolierte Alte und verursachte Existenzschäden. Gerichte und Medien versagten bei der Überprüfung. Es gab eine Kriminalisierung von Kritikern und eine Verharmlosung von Impfschäden. Es werden Fragen zur Regierungshandlung während der Pandemie gestellt. Bestseller reflektieren die Stimmung. Ein Untersuchungsausschuss wurde abgelehnt, daher ist Aufklärung wichtig. Translation: We had historically low hospital occupancy rates in Germany in 2020 and no extraordinary respiratory diseases. Mortality only increased in 2021. Sweden performed better without masks and lockdowns. The government responded with exaggerated measures, isolating the elderly and causing economic damage. Courts and media failed to review. There was a criminalization of critics and a downplaying of vaccine injuries. Questions are being raised about government action during the pandemic. Bestsellers reflect the mood. An inquiry was rejected, so clarification is important.

In this video, the speaker discusses the release of unredacted RKI protocols by Multipolar Magazine, which reveals that the lockdown measures were not based on scientific evidence but on political instructions. The speaker criticizes the mainstream media for their lack of interest in this issue and accuses them of being complicit in promoting government measures without questioning their effectiveness. The speaker also highlights the negative consequences of the lockdowns, such as increased child mortality and the neglect of other healthcare needs. The video concludes with a call for accountability and legal action against those responsible. The transcript is in German.

Wir hatten historisch niedrige Klinikbelegungen in Deutschland 2020, weniger schwere Atemwegserkrankungen, und die Sterblichkeit stieg erst 2021. Schweden schnitt besser ab als Deutschland laut WHO. Die Pandemie basierte auf Massentests mit schwankenden Ergebnissen. Politik reagierte mit Lockdowns, Schulschließungen, und isolierte Alte. Kritiker wurden kriminalisiert, Medien folgten dem PCR-Narrativ. Es gab keine Gefahr, aber die Politik schürte Angst. Warum die Kehrtwende zu Massnahmen? Warum Zwangsimpfungen? Bestseller reflektieren die Stimmung. Ein Untersuchungsausschuss wäre angemessen gewesen. Vielen Dank. Translation: We had historically low hospital occupancy rates in Germany in 2020, fewer severe respiratory illnesses, and mortality only increased in 2021. Sweden performed better than Germany according to the WHO. The pandemic was based on mass testing with fluctuating results. Politics responded with lockdowns, school closures, and isolating the elderly. Critics were criminalized, media followed the PCR narrative. There was no danger, but politics fueled fear. Why the turnaround to measures? Why forced vaccinations? Bestsellers reflect the mood. An investigative committee would have been appropriate. Thank you very much.

In this video, the speaker discusses the release of unredacted protocols from the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) regarding COVID-19 measures. The speaker criticizes mainstream media for not covering this issue and praises the Multipolar Magazine for their efforts. The speaker highlights key points from the protocols, such as the lack of evidence for FFP2 masks and the negative effects of lockdown measures. They also criticize politicians and media figures for their handling of the pandemic and the division it has caused in society. The speaker concludes by urging viewers to take legal action against those responsible.

Nach meinem Verständnis ist klar, diese Impfung sei absichtlich als Versuch am Menschen gedacht. Es wird behauptet, mehrere Impfstoffe seien schnell entwickelt; Testungen seien illegal. Relevante Daten würden erst Postmarketing erhoben. Es heiße, Impfstoffchargen seien mit Bakterien-DNA kontaminiert; MWGFD-Labor publiziert peer-reviewed. RNA und DNA seien verpackt und sofort von Zellen aufgenommen; Spike-Protein produziert sich Stunden später; Modifikation der Zelle. Das sei kriminell, Kapitalverbrechen. From my understanding, it is clear this vaccination was intentional as a human trial. It is claimed that several vaccines were developed quickly; testing was illegal. Relevant data would be collected only post-marketing. It says vaccine batches were contaminated with bacterial DNA; MWGFD-Lab publication peer-reviewed. RNA and DNA are packaged and immediately taken up by cells; spike protein is produced hours later; modification of the cell. This is criminal, capital crime.

**German Summary:** Die Impfung erwies sich als Segen für Geld- und Weltelite, Pharmaindustrie und Politik, die unter dem Slogan der öffentlichen Gesundheit ihre Interessen verfolgten. Die WHO, ein nicht demokratisch gewählter Privatverein, versucht, die Vollmacht über das Gesundheitswesen in 190 Mitgliedsstaaten zu erlangen, wobei Deutschland einer der größten Unterstützer ist. In sechs Monaten stimmt der Bundestag darüber ab, ob die WHO die Vollmacht erhält, medizinische Notlagen zu verkünden, die das Aufheben von Menschenrechten begründen und die Verwendung von genbasierten RNA-Impfstoffen zwingend macht. Die WHO plant, diese Impfstoffe für Mensch und Tier einzuführen, motiviert durch Geld und Macht. **English Translation:** Vaccination proved to be a boon for the financial and global elite, the pharmaceutical industry, and politics, who pursued their interests under the slogan of public health. The WHO, a non-democratically elected private association, is trying to gain authority over healthcare in 190 member states, with Germany being one of the biggest supporters. In six months, the Bundestag will vote on whether to grant the WHO the authority to declare medical emergencies that justify the suspension of human rights and make the use of gene-based RNA vaccines mandatory. The WHO plans to introduce these vaccines for humans and animals, motivated by money and power.

Last month, a group of European Parliament members, including myself, wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) expressing concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines. The EMA's response revealed shocking facts. They admitted that the vaccines were only approved for individual immunization and not for controlling or preventing infections. Furthermore, there is a lack of data supporting the vaccines' effectiveness in preventing infections. In fact, the EMA stated that repeated exposure to the virus increases the risk of infection even in vaccinated individuals. The government's campaigns promoting vaccination to protect others were unauthorized and based on misinformation. The EMA also emphasized the need to carefully consider safety information before administering vaccines. The mass vaccination efforts were in direct contradiction to the approved use of the vaccines. The government and supporting political parties should be held accountable for their lies and deception. The vaccination campaign needs to be halted as it is not safe and does not meet EMA requirements.

Nach seinem Verständnis war die Impfung absichtlich, Menschen als Versuchskaninchen zu verwenden. Protokoll vom 27 April 20 20: mehrere Impfstoffe im Schnellverfahren entwickelt und getestet. Die Tests seien nicht legartig; BioNTech habe keine Versuchstieranlage und habe Wirksamkeit sowie Sicherheit nicht geprüft. Danach kam heraus, dass Impfstoffchargen kontaminiert sind mit Bakterien-DNA. Das ist kriminell, ein Kapitalverbrechen. According to his understanding, the vaccination was intentional to use people as guinea pigs. Protocol from 27 April 20 20: several vaccines in a fast-track development and testing. The tests were not legal; BioNTech had no animal testing facility and did not test efficacy or safety. Afterwards it emerged that vaccine batches are contaminated with bacterial DNA. That is criminal, a capital crime.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your interest. It seems that a so-called "Megalockdown" is being prepared in the Chancellor's Office, without informing the public or the parliament. We find this situation unacceptable. The Chancellor must inform the public and the parliament about her intentions. We demand information on the data and scientific facts that form the basis of the upcoming discussions. We are particularly interested in knowing if there are alternatives being considered that would allow people more freedom. These are the questions that need to be addressed openly and not discussed behind closed doors.

In Deutschland gab es im Jahr 2020 und 2021 weniger schwere Atemwegserkrankungen als üblich. Die Sterblichkeit stieg erst ab 2021 an. Schweden schnitt besser ab als Deutschland. Die Regierung reagierte mit Lockdowns und Zwangsmaßnahmen, während Kritiker kriminalisiert wurden. Es gab eine Kehrtwende in den Maßnahmen, obwohl keine besondere Gefahr bestand. Die Politik zwang die Bevölkerung zur Impfung mit experimentellen Impfstoffen. Es gibt Bestseller, die die Ereignisse kritisch beleuchten. Ein Untersuchungsausschuss wurde abgelehnt, daher ist es wichtig, dass wir zur Aufklärung beitragen. Translation: In Germany, there were fewer severe respiratory illnesses in 2020 and 2021 than usual. Mortality only increased from 2021 onwards. Sweden performed better than Germany. The government responded with lockdowns and mandatory measures, while critics were criminalized. There was a turnaround in the measures, despite no significant danger. The government forced the population to get vaccinated with experimental vaccines. There are bestsellers that critically examine the events. An investigative committee was rejected, so it is important that we contribute to clarification.

I have an internal document from Pfizer Laboratories that reveals the manipulation of chemical and biological processes in the development of the Pfizer SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. The document states that the vaccine contains Graphene Oxide, a dangerous toxin, with 15 billion nanoparticles in a 30 milligram shot. When Graphene Oxide enters the body, it forms structures that lead to blood clots and heart failure. Additionally, we have accessed patent databases and a copy of the deleted Wuhan databases, which support the claim that COVID-19 and its vaccines are bioweapons.

Das RKI schätzte das Risiko am 24. Februar 2020 als gering ein, während das BMG am selben Tag Maßnahmen wie Wirtschaftsstilllegung und Ausgangssperren empfahl. Das BMG betont, dass die Risikobewertung ab dem 17. März 2020 auf wissenschaftlicher Basis und nicht durch politische Anweisungen erfolgte. Es wird jedoch festgestellt, dass es keine Dokumente oder Protokolle gibt, die diese wissenschaftliche Debatte im RKI belegen. Das BMG wiederholt, dass es sich um interne RKI Protokolle handelt und keine weiteren Informationen preisgeben wird. Translation: The RKI assessed the risk as low on February 24, 2020, while the BMG recommended measures such as economic shutdown and curfews on the same day. The BMG emphasizes that the risk assessment from March 17, 2020, was based on science and not political instructions. However, it is noted that there are no documents or protocols to support this scientific debate within the RKI. The BMG reiterates that these are internal RKI protocols and no further information will be disclosed.

Politiker fordern eine Aufarbeitung des Coronamanagements im Bundestag, angestoßen durch Recherchen von NDR, WDR und der Süddeutschen Zeitung. Demnach wollte das Robert Koch Institut die Risikobewertung Anfang 2022 von sehr hoch auf hoch herabstufen, was Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach jedoch verhinderte. Die FDP wirft Lauterbach Einflussnahme auf die RKI-Bewertung vor und fordert seinen Rücktritt. Lauterbach verteidigt sein Handeln und verweist auf die damals hohen Todeszahlen. --- Politicians are calling for a review of the coronavirus management in the Bundestag, prompted by investigations from NDR, WDR, and Süddeutsche Zeitung. The Robert Koch Institute reportedly wanted to lower the risk assessment from very high to high in early 2022, but Health Minister Lauterbach prevented this. The FDP accuses Lauterbach of influencing the RKI's assessment and demands his resignation. Lauterbach defends his actions, citing the high death toll at that time.

Ein Whistleblower vom Robert Koch Institut enthüllt Uneinigkeit mit der Coronapolitik und Ministeriellen Weisungen. Öffentlichkeit wurde getäuscht und Minister Lauterbach erklärte die Pandemie fälschlicherweise für beendet. RKI Mitarbeiter zweifeln an der Pandemie und distanzieren sich von der Hysterie, die sie selbst erzeugt haben. Die Pandemie wurde politisch beendet, obwohl medizinisch keine Notlage bestand. English Translation: A whistleblower from the Robert Koch Institute reveals disagreement with the Corona policy and ministerial directives. The public was deceived and Minister Lauterbach falsely declared the end of the pandemic. RKI employees doubt the pandemic and distance themselves from the hysteria they created. The pandemic was politically ended, even though there was no medical emergency.

I am one of the scientists involved in a study on the safety and dependency of vaccine batches. We found three types of side effects: mild, severe, and even death. These adverse effects were present in the initial batches, which may have been changed during production or transportation. Patients were not informed of the risks and some received poor-quality batches. The Vice President of Pfizer admitted to building the plane while flying, and we have shown that one wing has fallen off. There is a safety issue that the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and national institutions should have addressed and informed the public about. Our study also suggests a potential link between certain cancers and different vaccine batches. We have observed increased mortality rates in European countries since May 21st. The EMA should have reacted to these findings and halted vaccinations or at least withdrawn the problematic batches. As a concerned citizen and doctor, I expected more action from the EMA. Thank you.

Wir hatten in Deutschland im Jahr 2020 historisch niedrige Klinikbelegungen, weniger schwere Atemwegserkrankungen und keine erhöhte Sterblichkeit. Schweden schnitt besser ab als Deutschland laut WHO. Die Regierung reagierte mit harten Maßnahmen, während Gerichte, Medien und Wissenschaft versagten. Es gab Kriminalisierung von Maßnahmenkritikern, fehlende Prüfung der Verhältnismäßigkeit der Maßnahmen und Panikmache. Es werden Fragen zur Regierungshandlung in der Pandemie gestellt, wie die Verabreichung experimenteller Impfstoffe und das Fehlen eines Untersuchungsausschusses. Bestseller-Bücher reflektieren die Stimmung der Bevölkerung. Anklagen gegen die Regierung werden erhoben. Translation: We had historically low hospital admissions, fewer severe respiratory illnesses, and no increased mortality in Germany in 2020. Sweden performed better than Germany according to the WHO. The government responded with harsh measures, while courts, media, and science failed. There was criminalization of critics of the measures, lack of examination of the proportionality of the measures, and fear-mongering. Questions are being raised about government actions during the pandemic, such as the administration of experimental vaccines and the absence of a parliamentary inquiry. Bestselling books reflect the mood of the population. Charges against the government are being made.

Last month, I, along with six colleagues from the European Parliament, wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) expressing concerns about the COVID vaccines. The EMA's response revealed shocking facts. They admitted that the vaccines were only approved for individual immunization, not for controlling or preventing infections. The EMA emphasized the lack of data on the vaccines' ability to prevent transmission. In fact, repeated exposure to the virus could increase the risk of infection even in vaccinated individuals. The government's campaigns promoting vaccination to protect others were unauthorized and based on misinformation. The EMA also stated that vaccinations were solely for the protection of the vaccinated individual, and each case should be carefully evaluated for safety before administering the vaccine. The government's vaccination policy disregarded reporting of side effects within the first two weeks after vaccination, falsely attributing any complaints to the virus. This information exposes the flaws in the vaccination strategy and calls for an immediate halt to the campaign.

In a video released on June 16, 2023, Dr. Christian Haffner shares the protocols of the German government's Corona Expert Council, which shed light on the experts' prioritization of their scientific ideology over citizens' well-being. The protocols reveal the council's involvement in the government's decision-making process regarding a general vaccination mandate, which was ultimately rejected by the Bundestag. The transcripts also highlight the ongoing debate on the effectiveness of measures like masks and lockdowns, as well as the importance of communication and increasing vaccination rates, particularly among children. The video further discusses the risk-benefit ratio of vaccination, potential long-term effects of myocarditis, and the need for clear and transparent communication. It emphasizes the experiences of individuals affected by the virus and the significance of reliable information. The role of experts and the government in managing the pandemic is examined, with a call for an independent commission to evaluate the measures taken. The video concludes by addressing the impact of the pandemic on society and the necessity of a global effort to combat the virus.

In a video, Dr. Christian Haffner shares the obtained protocols of the government's Corona Expert Council after a legal battle with the Chancellor's Office. These protocols reveal the experts' prioritization of their scientific ideology over citizens' well-being, as seen in their proposal for a general vaccination mandate, which was rejected by the Bundestag. The discussions within the transcripts cover topics such as Omicron, boosting, communication and contact restrictions, the effectiveness of masks, and the impact of the pandemic on mental health. The video also addresses the risks and benefits of vaccination, particularly regarding myocarditis in young people, and questions the discrepancy between expert advice and public communication. It highlights the experiences of individuals with long-term effects from vaccination and calls for an independent commission to investigate the pandemic's handling. The importance of clear communication, reliable information, and individual and societal responsibility in combating the pandemic is emphasized.

Nederlandse samenvatting: Afgelopen maand schreef ik met Joachim Koez en zes EU-parlementscollega’s een brief aan de EMA over de Covid-vaccins en vroeg om opheldering en mogelijk intrekking van de markttoelating. De EMA antwoordde met schokkende feiten: "de corona vaccins alleen en uitsluitend op de markt heeft toegelaten voor individuele immunisatie En absoluut niet voor beheersing van besmetting en absoluut niet voor het voorkomen of verminderen van besmettingen." "EMA's beoordelingsrapporten over de toelating van vaccins benadrukken het gebrek aan gegevens over besmettelijkheid." "De vaccins waren niet bedoeld voor het voorkomen van besmettingen en er zijn al helemaal geen gegevens die onderbouwen dat de vaccins helpen tegen besmettingen." "Sterker nog, de EMA verklaart herhaalde blootstelling aan het virus verhoogt de kans op infecties, zelfs in gevaccineerden." "Vaccinaties zijn uitsluitend voor de bescherming van het gevaccineerde individu." "alle veiligheidsinformatie zorgvuldig worden overwogen alvorens een vaccinatie toe te dienen of aan te bevelen." Verder: "de eerste 14 dagen na vaccinatie juist niet werden gemeld omdat het vaccin 10 tot 14 dagen nodig zou hebben om effectief te worden. Alle klachten in die periode werden juist aan het coronavirus toegeschreven." De regering wist dat de vaccins niet zouden beschermen tegen de verspreiding van het virus maar deelde deze informatie niet met de burgers. "De vaccinatiecampagnes dienen zo snel mogelijk stopgezet te worden. Het is gewoonweg niet veilig en ze voldoen niet aan de eisen die de EMA stelt." De regering en alle politieke partijen die dit steunden behoren op hun leugens en bedrog afgerekend te worden. English translation: Last month I, together with Joachim Koez and six colleagues from the European Parliament, wrote a letter to the EMA about the Covid vaccines and asked for clarification and possibly withdrawal of market authorization. The EMA replied with shocking facts: "the corona vaccines were only and exclusively authorised on the market for individual immunization And absolutely not for controlling infection or for preventing or reducing infections." "EMA's assessment reports on the authorisation of vaccines emphasise the lack of data on transmissibility." "The vaccines were not intended for the prevention of infections and there are absolutely no data to support that the vaccines help against infections." "Moreover, the EMA states that repeated exposure to the virus increases the risk of infections, even in vaccinated individuals." "Vaccinations are solely for the protection of the vaccinated individual." "all safety information should be carefully considered before administering or recommending a vaccination." Furthermore: "the first 14 days after vaccination were not reported because the vaccine would take 10 to 14 days to become effective. All complaints in that period were indeed attributed to the coronavirus." The government knew that the vaccines would not protect against the spread of the virus but did not share this information with the citizens. "The vaccination campaigns should be stopped as soon as possible. It is simply not safe and they do not meet the requirements set by the EMA." And the government and all political parties that supported this should be held accountable for their lies and deception.

I, along with six colleagues, wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) expressing concerns about the COVID vaccines. The EMA's response revealed shocking facts. They admitted that the vaccines were only approved for individual immunization, not for controlling or preventing infections. The EMA emphasized the lack of data on contagiousness and stated that repeated exposure to the virus could increase the risk of infection, even for the unvaccinated. The government's campaigns promoting vaccination to protect others were unauthorized and based on false information. The EMA also highlighted the importance of carefully considering safety information before administering vaccines. The mass vaccination efforts were in direct contradiction to the approved use of the vaccines. The EMA expected reports of side effects, but the government failed to report them, endangering lives. The vaccination campaign should be halted immediately.