reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In the Megyn Kelly Show, Megyn discusses the ongoing shift to virtual learning in schools despite evidence showing that schools are safe for children and that remote learning is detrimental to their development. She expresses frustration over the continued push for vaccine mandates, especially given the mild nature of COVID-19 in children. Zuby, the guest, agrees, highlighting that healthy children rarely suffer severe consequences from the virus and that the measures taken during the pandemic have caused significant harm to their social and mental well-being. Zuby criticizes the mindset that has developed around safety and fear, suggesting that society has become overly cautious and that children should not bear the burden of adult fears. He emphasizes that the pandemic has revealed a culture of weakness and safetyism, where individuals are overly protected from risks. He argues that life inherently involves risks and that fostering resilience in children is crucial. The conversation shifts to the politicization of COVID-19 responses, with Zuby noting the stark differences in how various states have handled the pandemic. He points out that the ongoing fear and mandates are often politically motivated rather than based on scientific evidence. They also discuss the media's obsession with January 6th, with Zuby suggesting that the sensationalism serves to keep people divided and distracted. On the topic of censorship, Zuby expresses concern over the silencing of dissenting voices, particularly regarding vaccine discussions. He argues that open dialogue is essential for a healthy society and that censorship erodes trust in institutions. The discussion touches on the backlash faced by individuals like Patton Oswalt for associating with Dave Chappelle, illustrating the pressure to conform to prevailing narratives. Finally, they address a recent incident at Arizona State University involving two students who confronted white peers in a multicultural center. Zuby critiques the activist language used by the students and the broader implications of such incidents, advocating for treating individuals as equals rather than through the lens of race. He concludes by emphasizing the need for honest conversations and the importance of standing up against the culture of fear and division.

The last day of school felt surreal as teachers and students faced the abrupt shift to remote learning. Teachers adapted quickly, organizing food drives and supporting students in crisis. Four key ideas emerged: engage parents, demand equity, support the whole student, and rethink assessment. This moment offers a chance to reshape education, prioritizing wellness and equity, while moving away from excessive standardized testing. We must seize this opportunity to create a better system for all.

Megyn Kelly discusses rising concerns for the safety of Supreme Court justices after left-wing activists published their home addresses, calling for protests against what they label "extremist justices." This follows Justice Alito's cancellation of a public appearance due to safety fears. Democrats are renewing calls to pack the court and codify Roe v. Wade, despite lacking the votes to do so. California plans to become an abortion sanctuary, but Governor Newsom's announcement contained a significant slip-up. Rich Lowry expresses anger over the activists targeting justices' homes, particularly highlighting the potential impact on their children. He emphasizes that this pressure campaign undermines the integrity of the Supreme Court and its deliberative process. Kelly and Lowry lament the erosion of norms and the increasing politicization of the court, noting that justices may now require 24/7 security. Kelly plays a clip of Jen Psaki, who fails to condemn the leak of the draft opinion, which has been criticized as a breach of trust. Lowry points out that no Democratic official has condemned the leak, indicating a troubling disregard for institutional norms. They discuss the implications of the leak on the court's legitimacy and the potential for violence against justices. Senator Ted Cruz joins the conversation, condemning the protests outside justices' homes as a manifestation of a broader effort by Democrats to politicize the court. He highlights the unprecedented nature of the leak and its potential to intimidate justices. Cruz also discusses the possibility of severe consequences for the leaker, emphasizing the need for accountability. Kelly and Cruz explore the implications of potential legislation to codify Roe v. Wade, noting that it would likely face legal challenges. They discuss the political landscape surrounding abortion rights and the shifting dynamics as Democrats attempt to rally support. Michael Knowles joins the show, discussing the disinformation czar Nina Jankowicz and her controversial statements regarding the Hunter Biden laptop and the Steele dossier. He expresses concern over the implications of the disinformation office within the Department of Homeland Security, suggesting it may target conservative voices. The conversation shifts to the impact of school closures during the pandemic, with Kelly criticizing Randi Weingarten for her role in keeping children out of school. They highlight the mental health crisis among children resulting from prolonged disruptions and the lack of accountability from those in power. Kelly concludes by teasing upcoming segments on the Supreme Court leak and a case involving a football coach fired for praying with his players, emphasizing the importance of these discussions in the current political climate.

The Megyn Kelly Show discusses the rise of discontent among parents in liberal areas, particularly focusing on a recent recall election in San Francisco where parents overwhelmingly voted to remove school board members due to their perceived neglect of children's education in favor of "woke" policies. The hosts emphasize that the recall was driven by concerned Democrats, not Republicans, highlighting a shift in voter sentiment against extreme left policies. The conversation touches on the broader implications of this trend, suggesting that parents across the country are becoming increasingly vocal about educational issues, as seen in Virginia and New Jersey. They discuss Jennifer Sey, a former Levi's executive who was fired for advocating for school reopenings, illustrating the backlash against those who challenge the prevailing narratives on education and COVID-19 policies. The hosts express concern over the left's tactics to silence dissent, including labeling opponents as racists or extremists. They critique the media's portrayal of these issues, arguing that the mainstream press has failed to accurately report on the motivations behind the protests and the recall elections, instead framing them as partisan battles. The discussion shifts to the Biden administration's declining approval ratings, particularly in battleground states, and how this reflects a broader dissatisfaction with Democratic leadership. The hosts note that many Democrats are now seeking alternative candidates for the 2024 election, indicating a lack of confidence in Biden's ability to lead. In a segment on Canada, they criticize Justin Trudeau's response to the trucker protests, describing his invocation of emergency powers as authoritarian. They express alarm at the government's tactics to suppress dissent, including freezing bank accounts of protesters and targeting supporters, drawing parallels to the treatment of dissenters in more oppressive regimes. The hosts conclude by emphasizing the importance of holding leaders accountable at the ballot box and remaining vigilant against government overreach, while also acknowledging the need for continued dialogue about these pressing issues. They highlight the significance of grassroots movements in shaping political landscapes and the necessity for citizens to engage actively in the democratic process.

In the Megyn Kelly Show, host Megyn Kelly interviews Jennifer Sey, the former president of Levi's, who resigned to speak out against COVID restrictions, particularly school closures. Sey, a long-time advocate for children's rights, faced internal backlash at Levi's after criticizing the impact of lockdowns on kids. She was offered a severance package to remain silent but chose to leave instead, emphasizing the importance of free speech and child advocacy. Sey recounts her background as a national gymnastics champion and discusses her experiences with the culture of obedience in the sport, which shaped her views on individualism and free expression. She highlights the contradiction in Levi's previous support for social issues while stifling dissent regarding school closures, which she views as a non-political stance focused on children's education. The conversation shifts to the ongoing legal battles over mask mandates in schools, particularly in Pennsylvania, where parents and advocates are fighting against new lawsuits aimed at reinstating mask mandates under the Americans with Disabilities Act. These lawsuits claim that without universal masking, immunocompromised children are at risk, despite evidence suggesting that masks do not significantly prevent COVID transmission among children. Kelly introduces guests involved in the fight against mask mandates, including attorney Jay Chadwick Schnee, school board member Jarrett Coleman, and parent Jamie Walker. They discuss the legal and political landscape in Pennsylvania, where some school districts have successfully challenged the governor's authority to impose mask mandates. The group expresses frustration over the lack of transparency in decision-making processes and the perceived hypocrisy of those advocating for continued masking. The discussion highlights the divide among parents regarding mask mandates, with many advocating for a return to normalcy and questioning the effectiveness of cloth masks. They emphasize the need for accountability and the importance of prioritizing children's well-being over political narratives. The interview concludes with a call for a more balanced approach to public health that considers the diverse needs of all students.

Whitney Webb opens by noting that measures first justified as emergency during COVID—remote learning, distancing, high‑tech tools—were quickly framed as permanent “new normal” across sectors, with education especially targeted. She argues these changes will shape generations’ health and development, while discussions of quarantines’ effects on children are largely absent. Remote learning and EdTech are presented as here to stay, fueled by corporate takeover of American education, and with unions often promoting policy expansion under public‑health rhetoric. John Klyczek, a professor and author, outlines evidence he sees for the ineffectiveness of distancing and masking, including studies claiming in‑person schooling does not raise community transmission and that school‑age youth deaths from COVID are below typical flu deaths. He contends the three‑to‑six‑foot policy became a lever to sustain hybrid or blended learning, tying this to public‑private EdTech partnerships. He traces ulterior motives to conflicts of interest between teachers unions (NEA, AFT) and EdTech/UNESCO, arguing the unions have long collaborated with IBM on “teaching machines” and adaptive learning software, from the 1960s to today’s platforms like DreamBox, Brightspace Leap, Clever, and Aleks. This lineage, he says, funnels students into workforce pathways and data‑driven governance. Discussing broader geopolitics, he describes UNESCO’s 2050 vision as depicting the “death of the school” in favor of infinitely personalized digital learning, with teachers as expendable and institutions as replaceable by AI and monitoring. He cites UNESCO’s earlier Intergovernmental Council language and transhumanist rhetoric about machine–human convergence, cyborgs, and nanotech, stressing the intent to globalize standards through partnerships with IBM, Microsoft, Apple, and others, and to embed these within public/private finance structures. They discuss technologies in current use: learning management systems (Desire2Learn, Canvas, Blackboard), adaptive modules via Brightspace Leap, and data dashboards that mine psychometrics and cognitive/behavioral signals. They warn this data could feed a social‑credit‑like system via blockchain‑based health or identity platforms (ID2020, Good Health Pass, VerifyVax), linking vaccines, testing, biometrics, and employment data across countries and sectors. They also recount an Illinois vaccine‑mandate experience, arguing mandates are about data capture and future governance rather than health, linking it to blockchain IDs, vaccine passports, and “careers pathways” funded by impact investing. The discussion concludes with cautions about precision medicine and precision education—genetic baselines shaping learning—and a call to document and resist the depersonalizing, data‑driven overhaul of education. For further reading and updates, Klyczek directs to schoolworldorder.info and Unlimited Hangout, plus his YouTube/Bitchute channels and a paid Webbrain database.

The discussion between Jordan Peterson and Karol Markowicz centers on the ideological capture of children in the education system, particularly regarding age-appropriate content. Markowicz's book, *Stolen Youth*, addresses how children are being targeted for indoctrination, with inappropriate materials, including pornographic books, being introduced into schools under the guise of inclusivity. They argue that the left seeks to remove boundaries of age-appropriateness, exemplified by events like drag queen story hours evolving into inappropriate performances. Markowicz highlights the role of teacher unions and library associations in promoting ideologically driven content, often using accusations of homophobia to defend the inclusion of explicit materials. They discuss the historical context of sexual liberalization and its implications for education, questioning how to teach children about sex without moral distinctions. The conversation touches on the broader cultural revolution, drawing parallels to past totalitarian regimes, and emphasizes the need for parents to be vigilant and involved in their children's education. They also explore the detrimental effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on children's education and mental health, noting how children were deprioritized during lockdowns. Markowicz reflects on her experiences in New York, contrasting it with the freedoms found in Florida, where she feels less constrained by social pressures. The conversation concludes with a call for parents to engage in local politics, particularly school boards, to combat the ideological shifts in education and protect children's interests.

Megyn Kelly opens the show with the shocking news of Pope Francis's death at age 88, following a long battle with health issues, including double pneumonia. Cardinal Kevin Frell announced the news, stating that the bishop of Rome had returned to the house of the father. Although the official cause of death has not been released, Pope Francis had been hospitalized for respiratory issues for over a month. His last public appearance was on Easter Sunday, where he greeted Vice President JD Vance. Pope Francis, elected in March 2013, was the first pope from Latin America and brought a progressive energy to the Catholic Church. He focused on global issues like climate change and poverty, while maintaining traditional stances on matters such as celibacy and abortion. His views on immigration often clashed with conservative perspectives, particularly during the Trump administration, where he criticized policies that prioritized building walls over bridges. In a letter to U.S. bishops, he expressed concern over mass deportations, highlighting the dignity of vulnerable families. Kelly reflects on the complexities of the Catholic Church's political involvement and the challenges faced by Pope Francis, emphasizing the tug-of-war between his messaging and the beliefs of conservative Catholics. Following his death, a public viewing is expected, leading to a conclave to elect his successor, which typically occurs 15 to 20 days after a pope's passing. The discussion shifts to illegal immigration, with Kelly expressing frustration over the Trump administration's struggles to deport undocumented immigrants. Recent polls indicate that a majority of Americans now support deporting all illegal immigrants, a significant increase from previous years. Kelly cites estimates suggesting there may be as many as 18 million undocumented immigrants in the U.S., complicating the deportation efforts. Kevin O'Leary joins the conversation, discussing the political implications of immigration policy and the challenges faced by the Trump administration. He notes that many illegal immigrants contribute to small businesses, raising questions about potential pathways to legal residency for those without criminal records. The conversation highlights the complexities of immigration reform and the political landscape surrounding it. The show then transitions to a discussion with David Zweig, author of *An Abundance of Caution*, who critiques the decision-making processes behind school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Zweig argues that the closures disproportionately harmed children, particularly those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. He emphasizes the need for accountability and a historical record of the decisions made during the pandemic, pointing out the failures of public health officials and the media in addressing the needs of children. Zweig discusses the flawed models used to justify school closures and the lack of skepticism from the media, which failed to question the narratives presented by health authorities. He highlights the importance of evidence-based decision-making and the consequences of ignoring data, particularly regarding the impact on children's education and well-being. The conversation concludes with a reflection on the broader implications of the pandemic response, emphasizing the need for critical thinking and accountability in public health policy.

In a conversation between Joe Rogan and Gad Saad, they discuss the impact of COVID-19 on their lives and the broader societal implications. Saad shares that his friend Jamie had a mild case of COVID, while he has consistently tested negative. They reflect on how the pandemic has forced many to adapt to remote interactions, yet their audience numbers have increased as people seek honest content during these times. As they approach the upcoming election, both express concerns about the divisive political climate and the economic struggles many face due to lockdown measures. Saad criticizes the prolonged restrictions in California, suggesting they are politically motivated rather than based on public health needs. He emphasizes the importance of personal freedoms and the unprecedented nature of government control during the pandemic. The discussion shifts to the nature of parenting and societal expectations, with Saad likening inconsistent COVID regulations to poor parenting, which creates confusion and anxiety. They also touch on the differences in lockdown measures across Canada and the U.S., with Saad noting that Montreal is experiencing strict restrictions. Rogan and Saad explore the psychological effects of lockdowns, including the rise in mental health issues and the economic fallout from business closures. They argue that the costs of lockdowns, such as increased anxiety and depression, have not been adequately considered in public health discussions. The conversation then delves into the role of academia and the media in shaping public discourse. Saad critiques the tendency of some academics to avoid engaging with alternative media platforms, arguing that they miss opportunities to reach broader audiences. He highlights the importance of being open to diverse ideas and engaging in meaningful conversations. They discuss the challenges of being a public intellectual, with Saad sharing his experiences of facing backlash for his views. He emphasizes the need for intellectual courage and the importance of standing up for truth, even in the face of criticism. The dialogue also touches on the nature of comedy and the pressures comedians face. Saad reflects on the unique challenges women comedians encounter in a male-dominated industry, while Rogan shares insights into his own experiences in stand-up comedy. They discuss the importance of authenticity and the struggle to maintain a genuine voice in a competitive environment. As the conversation progresses, they address the complexities of societal norms and the impact of political correctness on free speech. Saad argues that the redefinition of terms and concepts can lead to a stifling of honest discourse, while Rogan emphasizes the need for open dialogue and the importance of engaging with differing perspectives. They conclude by discussing the significance of personal relationships and the pursuit of happiness. Saad stresses the importance of finding fulfillment in one's work and personal life, while Rogan shares his own experiences of balancing success with personal happiness. They both agree that the pursuit of truth and meaningful connections is essential for a fulfilling life. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges of navigating a complex social landscape, the importance of intellectual honesty, and the need for individuals to engage actively in the battle of ideas.