TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

People claim that some control the world, and one person stated that they actually do. Another person said that if JFK kissed the wall, he'd still be alive. When asked about the goal behind a film, one person responded that it was to push Satan, normalize gender confusion, and celebrate sin, adding that the younger they learn, the better. Another person stated that too much joy and tradition is the real problem, which they intend to fix one pride flag and fractured home at a time. One person alluded to prior knowledge of the towers falling. Another mentioned Silverstein buying terror coverage six weeks before the towers fell and then receiving the largest payout in history.

Alex Jones believes federal agencies are trying to destroy him because he predicted 9/11, specifying planes flying into the World Trade Centers and blaming Osama bin Laden. Jones claims he researched false flag attacks and saw preprogramming in the news. He says he specifically predicted the CIA would fly planes into the World Trade Centers and blame it on Bin Laden. Jones says segments of intelligence agencies were tracking the hijackers, who were being trained in US military bases and given government money. He says Bin Laden was a CIA asset used to destabilize areas. Jones says the CIA and FBI were involved, and the Project for the American Century called for a "new Pearl Harbor." Jones says he was on cable access in Texas figuring this out while mainstream journalists didn't see it. He says the X-Files spinoff, The Lone Gunman, had a similar plot, and Chris Carter said the CIA gave him the idea. Jones says he also predicted they'd try to shoot Trump at a rally. He says the UN and the Rockefeller Foundation have been planning a global system using disease acts. Jones believes he's just taking them at their word. Jones says he's embraced the responsibility, stopped drinking, and lost weight. He says it's a spiritual battle, and people need to choose a side. Jones says the globalists had narrative control, but now a new international order is forming. He says the globalists made a deal with communist China, but China double-crossed them. Jones says the EU is allying with China, and the UK wants to be in an alliance with the US. Jones says there's a rise in violence and acceptance of violence. He says a long-time employee was assassinated. Jones says the US lost a war with Russia in Ukraine, and we're overstating our power. He says the Pentagon assessed that giving Ukraine weapons to strike targets within Russia had a 50% chance of nuclear exchange, but they did it anyway. Jones says the EU is refusing to end the war and arresting political opposition. He says Trump is trying to end it. Jones says the globalist order was collapsing, and Trump is coming in with a good system. He says the Democrats are escalating domestic unrest and terrorism, leading to a triggering event. Jones says they've been hyping a new virus to stop Trump's reboot of the economy. Jones says speech is being controlled in formerly free countries. He says they need to end speech in the US and shut down X. Jones says a mass shooting will be used as a pretext to shut it down. He says he got big news that the Connecticut Supreme Court won't hear his appeal. Jones says Hillary ran ads talking about him and twisting what he said about the Sandy Hook shooting. Jones says he was held in default for not giving them his secret plan to get rich off these people. He says he was given 20 things he couldn't talk about. Jones says they want to shut him down. Jones says the Democratic Party, the judge department, the FBI, and the CIA are involved. He says Obama illegally declared him a national security threat. Jones says the Justice Department paid over $4 million to the Sandy Hook Foundation. Jones says the US Trustee ordered a private security company to show up with guns. Jones says the judge said there was never an auction and that it was fraudulent. Jones says all of this stems from a school shooting in Connecticut, and he suggested there was something weird about it. Jones says he didn't commit the school shooting. Jones says no one's trying to find out why Adam Lanza did it. Jones says he's being blamed for the murder of all these kids when he had nothing to do with it. Jones says the Sandy Hook families are blaming him and raising money off his name. Jones says he's the ant in Bug's Life. Jones says he thinks a lot of the ethnic hate on social media is fake. Jones says there's gonna be an act of violence, ethnic-inspired violence, and that event will be used to shut down free speech on social media. Jones says the Connecticut Supreme Court said they're not even gonna hear his appeal. Jones says they're coming to shut down Infowars. Jones says people can find him on X at real Alex Jones. Jones says all of your voices are so important. Jones says Iran is plan B for the globalists. Jones says Netanyahu is trying to drag us into war since 9/11. Jones says Israel will nuke Iran, and then all hell's gonna break loose. Jones says the globalists are very reckless. Jones says smart, aware people are no longer smart or aware. Jones says it's like a mist that settles over all of us. Jones says we're sleepwalking into Armageddon. Jones says the establishment is all about never actually making a decision they get in trouble for. Jones says the future's been here for a while. Jones says they want a nuclear war. Jones says Ian Fleming wrote about a crazy billionaire who's gonna release a bioweapon on the earth. Jones says Aldous Huxley wrote Brave New World, which is an instruction manual of what they wanna do. Jones says we have to choose God, justice, and free will. Jones says if you're fighting evil, evil's gonna come after you. Jones says the lawyers are arrogant. Jones says what they've done to him, they wanna do to you. Jones says he could be shut down within two days, two weeks. Jones says they are coming to shut down Infowars. Jones says he's not gonna give up. Jones says it's only gonna make what he does that much bigger.

The documentary presents a sweeping narrative that the modern era’s wars and security state are driven by deliberate, government-sponsored manipulation—false flag operations and orchestrated crises designed to terrify populations, justify expanded power, and secure global hegemony. It threads together historical examples, contemporary incidents, and testimonies to argue that the public has been misled by official narratives and that truth is being hidden behind “specters of fear.” False flag origins and early precedents - The program defines false flag operations as covert actions designed to appear as if carried out by other actors, with a long focus on the use of terror as a pretext for political ends. - Adolf Hitler’s regime is cited as a classic example: Reichstag fire in 1933, with a patsy framed for the blaze, enabling new laws that consolidated power. The film emphasizes the crisis as a vehicle to drift toward dictatorship and aggression. - The 1953 Iran coup is described as a CIA-MI6 operation (Operation Ajax) that overthrew Mohammad Mossaddegh after his nationalization of oil, with Western intelligence allegedly admitting to terror attacks and propaganda against Mossaddegh. The narrative stresses the role of MI6 and the CIA in orchestrating fear and regime change, and the long-term consequences of SAVAK and imperial influence. - Operation Gladio is presented as an umbrella for Western intelligence-led bombings in Europe (Italy, NATO states) designed to be blamed on leftists; Bologna’s 1980 bombing is highlighted as an instance where officials later spoke of Gladio’s civilian targeting. - The Gulf of Tonkin incident is recounted as a staged pretext to escalate U.S. involvement in Southeast Asia, with declassified accounts and tapes cited to show manipulated intelligence and the subsequent Tonkin Resolution enabling mass casualties. Cold War and postwar covert operations - The film cites Northwoods, a proposed plan to hijack aircraft and blame others to justify war with Cuba; it notes that President Johnson pursued some operational concepts in that vein, linking them to defense planning in the era. - The USS Liberty incident is recounted with claims of an Israeli attack that was allowed to proceed despite clear identification of the ship, and subsequent suppression of details. The narrative includes interviews with figures who allege political orders to sink the ship and to blame it on Egypt. - The 1964 Tonkin incident, the 1967-1968 war moves, and covert operations across the globe are woven into a larger claim that Western powers have repeatedly manufactured or exploited external threats to justify expansion and intervention. 7/7 and London: a modern false flag argument - The film pivots to the July 7, 2005 London bombings, arguing MI6 involvement and suggesting that Al Qaeda links were contrived or manipulated. It points to Madrid’s 2004 bombings as a precursor, noting that officials later admitted Al Qaeda had limited or no connection in some cases. - It presents testimony about MI6 involvement with operatives associated with or acting as assets, including claims about a mastermind linked to MI6 and the protection of a suspect (Aswat) by British intelligence. - The documentary emphasizes anomalies in the official narrative: a single bus diverted to Tavistock Square, eyewitness inconsistencies about the bomber, and post-event claims about surveillance footage and MO incongruities. It asserts evidence of cover-ups, whistleblowers, and political calculations aimed at maintaining fear and martial-law-like measures. - It frames the London attacks as a tool to bolster Tony Blair’s political standing, allow the passage of restrictive laws, and justify overseas military campaigns, while alleging a broader pattern of Western governments staging terror to secure interests. 9/11 and the “inside job” thesis - The centerpiece is a claim that 9/11 was an inside job, with expert and lay testimonies questioning the collapse of the World Trade Center towers, Building 7, and the presence of alternative explanations (thermite, controlled demolition). - The film cites declassified and public materials (Northwoods-like concepts; cited White House memos about luring Saddam into a war through staged actions; investigations into the Pentagon frames) to argue that the government manipulated intelligence and public opinion to justify the Iraq War. - It features a roster of notable figures—former MI5/MI6 whistleblowers, CIA veterans, and academics—who challenge the official 9/11 account, including references to Operation Northwoods, the PNAC document, and analyses suggesting a “false flag” justification for imperial aims. - Charlie Sheen’s public remarks are highlighted as a turning point in mainstream attention to alternative theories, followed by media coverage of new 9/11 footage and debates about Building 7, the Pentagon frames, and thermite evidence. - The documentary cites physicists and engineers who question official explanations, citing molten metal, traces of thermite, and expert analyses of the WTC collapse as signs of demolition rather than collapse from fire alone. Surveillance, civil liberties, and the information war - A recurring claim is that the modern battle is largely informational: psychological warfare, public relations, and control of the narrative are seen as the dominant form of warfare, with public opinion manipulation described as the real battlefield. - Edward Bernays is invoked as the architect of modern propaganda, with quotes about shaping masses and an “invisible government” pulling the strings—an “unseen mechanism” that governs democratic societies. - The film argues that fear and threats are used to erode civil liberties: expanded surveillance, identity cards, free-speech restrictions, and the use of homeland-security rhetoric to suppress dissent, including zones for demonstrations and media suppression in multiple democracies. - It mentions whistleblowers from MI5/MI6 who claim funding of extremist groups and complicity in covert actions, and it frames journalists and activists as agents of influence or targets of state pressure when challenging official narratives. Iraq, oil, and empire - Pentagon and White House documents are cited to claim that post-9/11 strategy sought to counter regional threats and secure access to oil resources, with basing and long-term occupation framed as part of a broader plan for permanent military presence and regional control. - The film argues that the “war on terror” is a pretext for a broader imperial project: redrawing borders, destabilizing regions to facilitate resource control, and exploiting crises to profit defense contractors. - It contends that the “new world order” seeks to keep populations under surveillance and compliance, with public narratives constructed around fear of terrorism and the need for security measures that erode cherished liberties. Closing call - The speakers urge viewers to uncover motive (qui bono), question official stories, and resist the expansion of government power through fear and manipulation. - They advocate for independent inquiry, whistleblowing, and public accountability to stop what they call an ongoing cycle of manufactured crises used to justify a global empire and a police-state governance model. Note: The summary mirrors the documentary’s asserted claims, statements, and testimonies as presented, without endorsing their veracity.

"In the morning of 09/11/2001, 19 men armed with box cutters directed by a man on dialysis in a cave fortress halfway around the world using a satellite phone and a laptop directed the most sophisticated penetration of the most heavily defended airspace in the world." "Osama bin Laden." "NIST has classified the data that they used for their model of WTC seven's collapse." "This man never existed nor is anything he had to say worthy of your attention." "They dumped his body in the ocean before telling anyone about it." "The rescue of Jessica Lynch." "This is the story of nine eleven brought to you by the media which told you the hard truths about"

Speaker 1 argues that "the core lie, is the nine eleven commission itself, which was an instrument, a political instrument of the Bush administration" run by "Philip Zellico," who "stage managed the explanation for nine eleven" so Americans would be convinced to invade Iraq; "he wrote the commission report with that in mind" and "before the investigation took place." He says "Chairman Tom Cain ... stage managed the entire thing and prevented investigators from looking into, like, core questions." He claims the CIA "was fully aware that many of the hijackers who committed nine eleven were in The United States," citing that "11 out of the 19 hijackers had visas for travel to The United States issued in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia" at "the moment that John Brennan was the station chief for the CIA in Saudi Arabia," and that "this is all documented" though the information was not shared with the FBI or the public, "and three thousand people died as a result." He states "Huge parts of the nine eleven story were left out of the commission report" and questions Building 7, urging accountability. The piece promises weekly episodes starting 09/11 at tuckercarlson.com.

In this video, two speakers discuss their views on the 9/11 conspiracy theories. Speaker 1 questions why Speaker 2 left a Ron Paul event when someone mentioned that 9/11 was an inside job. Speaker 2 explains that he found it stupid and lacking evidence. Speaker 1 then asks about Building 7, to which Speaker 2 dismisses the conversation as a no-win situation. They briefly discuss their support for Ron Paul and their views on government involvement in terrorism. Speaker 2 expresses his dislike for conspiracy theories without evidence. The conversation ends with Speaker 1 mentioning Alex Jones and Speaker 2 reiterating the need for evidence in conspiracy claims.

"On the morning of 09/11/2001, 19 men armed with box cutters directed by a man on dialysis in a cave fortress halfway around the world using a satellite phone and a laptop directed the most sophisticated penetration of the most heavily defended airspace in the world." "Overpowering the passengers and the military combat train pilots on four commercial aircraft before flying those planes wildly off course for over an hour without being molested by a single fighter interceptor." "These 19 hijackers, devout religious fundamentalists who like to drink alcohol, snort cocaine, and live with pink haired strippers..." "Osama bin Laden." "That investigation was delayed, underfunded, set up to fail, a conflict of interest, and a cover up from start to finish." "It was based on testimony extracted through torture, the records of which were destroyed." "This man never existed, nor is anything he had to say worthy of your attention, and if you say otherwise, you are a paranoid conspiracy theorist and deserve to be shunned by all of humanity." "This has been a public service announcement by Because ignorance is strength."

"The story they fed you doesn't add up. They had you staring at the wrong roof while the real operation was going down somewhere else. And just like every deep state hit in history, they wrapped it all up in with a patsy. 'This is twenty minutes before the shot, ladies and gentlemen. Look. There it is.' 'why do we have all these people crawling around on the roofs of OOVU that day.' 'I've gotta be honest with my audience. This is the easiest roof I've ever seen in my life.' 'I've seen almost no cameras. No cameras on campus.' 'Epstein was a key player in a multi decade blackmail operation against the most powerful people on the planet.' 'The Charlie's security team, we've known for many, many years. They are like brothers with Charlie.' 'Not one iota of evidence that that's true.'"

Pick it out, read it, and answer. Public place, you did it. Is this the best or the worst? The best. Probably the Obama thing. What is your wife talking about? We heard a lot in there. Who should get back in? We're not gonna discuss that. Secret Service, come here. Hi, look at y'all. We're not talking about it. That's an awesome answer. Not the White House. We were not at the White House. He was not elected yet. Anyway, moving on. I'm in trouble now. No, you're good.

"President Bush personally has nixed the effort of the nineeleven commission to get all the documents in the White House, especially the presidential daily briefs, which basically tell the commission and the American people what the President knew and when he knew it in regard to the potential attack on nineeleven and the attack itself in the follow-up." "He has personally nixed that information coming to nineeleven." "The truth of matter is the White House has played cover up and has slow walked this this game from the beginning." "It's a scam. It's absolutely disgusting." "We're an independent commission for an independent operational look at why nine eleven happened, what happened there, when the what the president and the government knew, and when they knew it." "We think the commission in many ways was set up to fail because we had, not enough money. We didn't have enough time."

The speaker mentions Daniel j Jones and how his Penn quarterly group played a role in j six. They believe that people don't want to talk about it because it would mean admitting they were wrong. The speaker also mentions that now everyone is acknowledging that Obama did something, which they had previously mentioned. They claim to be the think tank and find it amusing.

Speaker 0: I was impressed by the questions, and I think it helped him understand how I think and how we run the White House and how we deal with threats. Speaker 1: Mister president, critics suggested you wanted to appear jointly with the vice president so you could keep your story straight. Could you tell us what you think of the value of appearing together and how you would answer those critics? Speaker 2: First of all, look, if we had something to hide, we wouldn't have met with them in the first place. We answered all their questions. I came away good about the session. Speaker 3: And even the president and vice president agreed to meet with the commission, but with a catch. They insisted on meeting together behind closed doors and not under oath. Speaker 2: Mister president, why are you and the vice president insisting on appearing together before the nine eleven commission? Speaker 0: Because the nine eleven commission wants to ask us questions. That's why we're meeting, and I look forward to meeting with them and answering their questions

In this Joe Rogan podcast episode, the speakers cover a wide range of topics. They begin by discussing the recently released Project Aqua information by the US government, debating the origins and nature of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs) and their potential threat to humanity. They explore the possibility of these UAPs being spiritual or supernatural entities rather than extraterrestrial beings. The conversation then shifts to the implications of advanced artificial intelligence (AI) and the potential dangers it poses to humanity. Throughout the discussion, the speakers emphasize the need for caution and humility when dealing with these complex and unknown phenomena. The conversation then moves on to various other topics. They express frustration with the lack of honesty and reason in public discourse, touching on subjects such as slavery, nuclear weapons, the theory of evolution, and the current state of media and politics. They highlight the importance of truth and integrity in society, as well as the value of difficult experiences and the role of religion. The speakers also discuss the former White House press secretary, the state of journalism, creativity in comedy, and the importance of free speech. They criticize the lack of honesty and integrity in politics and media, emphasizing the need for open dialogue and the protection of individual rights. They express concern about the distortion of truth and the manipulation of public opinion for political agendas. Power dynamics between different groups, accusations of taking money from Russia, the importance of protecting the weak, and the decline of creativity in the United States are also touched upon. The rise of podcasts and the ability to have long-form conversations that challenge traditional media narratives are discussed. The speakers share personal experiences with the Grateful Dead, highlighting the value of human connection and the importance of listening to different perspectives. They stress the need for open conversations with people who have different opinions and caution against name-calling and censorship. The video also delves into topics such as the accuracy of predictions made by Alex Jones, the existence of supernatural phenomena, the role of the media in supporting government narratives, and the suspicious circumstances surrounding events like 9/11 and the Watergate scandal. The speakers question the motives behind these events and highlight the lack of transparency and accountability in government actions. They touch on the influence of Hollywood and the entertainment industry, as well as the erosion of privacy and the powerlessness of individuals in the face of government surveillance. Lastly, the conversation covers the JFK assassination, government surveillance, and power dynamics within organizations. They mention Nixon's knowledge of JFK's assassination, Trump's decision not to release JFK files, and the involvement of the CIA. The erosion of privacy rights and the vulnerability of weak leaders to evil influences are discussed. The speakers express their concerns about government overreach and emphasize the importance of demanding a more accountable and transparent system.

In this video, two speakers discuss their views on the 9/11 conspiracy theories. Speaker 1 questions why Speaker 2 left a Ron Paul event when someone mentioned that 9/11 was an inside job. Speaker 2 clarifies that he didn't leave because he believed it, but because he thought it was stupid. Speaker 1 asks about Building 7, but Speaker 2 refuses to continue the conversation. They also discuss government involvement in terrorism and the need for evidence before making claims. Speaker 2 criticizes Speaker 1 for bringing up the conspiracy without evidence. The conversation ends with Speaker 1 mentioning Alex Jones and Speaker 2 stating that evidence is necessary to imply a conspiracy.

Alex Jones believes federal agencies are trying to destroy him because he predicted 9/11, specifying planes would hit the World Trade Centers and blaming Osama bin Laden. He claims he saw preprogramming in the news and researched historical false flag attacks. Jones says he called 9/11 in detail, yet the 9/11 Commission never interviewed him. Jones says he knew Bin Laden was a CIA asset and CNN is a CIA broadcasting system. He cites a previous World Trade Center bombing attempt and a document by Cheney and Rumsfeld about needing a "new Pearl Harbor." Jones says he saw Gary Hart on CNN discussing big attacks before 9/11. He also references an X-Files episode with a similar plot, claiming the CIA gave the show the idea. Jones says much of what he predicts isn't prediction, but things globalists admit. He believes a spiritual revolution is happening, with good and evil becoming more distinct. Jones says he is taking globalists at their word and listening to people he disagrees with. He says the globalists are collapsing and a new international order is forming. He says the UN admitted to using disease acts to bring in a global system.

- I recognized an individual and 'have taken down the cameras minute four after Charlie was shot? The back camera of all the ones when you take the front camera.' - 'I've never seen that. He's never been behind me at an event. He's never been lingering around me at an event.' - I asked about 'his presence behind Charlie' and 'the mysterious phone call ... minute three after Charlie was assassinated.' - He told me explicitly that 'they were trying something new that day. Like, it was something new. Charlie's super ambitious. And on the AV thing, they were trying something new, and they wanted to be able to feed it back instantly to Arizona.' - 'None of it makes sense to me because these events are typically livestreamed. But again, something new. Okay?'

Speaker 3 launches a documentary-style indictment of Tucker Carlson, asserting he has “many connections Tucker Carlson has to the CIA and other groups,” that Carlson is “leading a major part of America off a cliff with his false conservative platform,” and that he is “a total shill, a puppet being used to distribute propaganda.” The speaker argues the left-right paradigm is false, claiming CIA agents train people in media propaganda regardless of network (CNN or Fox). Anderson Cooper is cited as an example, with the claim he interned at the CIA and was born into the Vanderbilt family, making him the face of CNN and Carlson the face of Fox. The speaker then traces Carlson’s background in detail: born 05/16/1969 in San Francisco; his father Richard Carlson divorced and remarried Patricia Swanson; Carlson attended multiple boarding schools in Switzerland and Rhode Island; graduated from Trinity College in 1991. The claim is made that Carlson attempted to join the CIA after graduation but was denied, with the suggestion that his journalism path was encouraged by his well-connected father. The narrative then catalogs Carlson’s father’s career: Richard Carlson started in journalism as a copy boy at the Los Angeles Times and a UPI reporter; later worked at several LA and San Diego outlets; became involved with San Diego Federal Savings and Loan (headed by Gordon Luce, a Reagan-era figure); ran for mayor of San Diego in 1984 and lost; Reagan announced his nomination to the United States Information Agency in 1986; served as Director of Voice of America, described as a propaganda broadcasting division; VOA is linked to the CIA, with the assertion that its purpose shifted from abroad broadcasting to domestic and international propaganda, including a CIA black site in Thailand (Cat’s Eye/Detention Site Green). The father’s later roles included ambassador to the Seychelles and CEO of King World Public Television; he became vice chairman of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (an Israel-lobby-linked group). The speaker asserts that Carlson’s path mirrors his father’s, arguing that Carlson’s early journalism work included policy review (Heritage Foundation publication), where Heritage Foundation’s founders (Paul Wyrick, Edwin Feulner, Joseph Coors) are described as influential, with Feulner allegedly connected to KCIA donations and UN reform task forces linked to CFR and the Project for the New American Century. The Heritage Foundation’s funding is linked to Coors, Chase Manhattan, Pfizer, Dow, Sears, GM, Amoco, Mobil, with David Rockefeller’s Chase Manhattan leadership invoked to support broader conspiratorial links among the Rockefellers, Rothschilds, CFR, and related networks. The claim is made that Buckley and Crystal (William Crystal) were CIA-connected or staffed, and that Tucker Carlson’s journalism career spanned outlets including Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Weekly Standard, New York Magazine, Reader’s Digest, Slate, Esquire, The New Republic, The New York Times, The Daily Beast, The Wall Street Journal, and television work for CNN, PBS, MSNBC, before Fox News. The video then connects Carlson to Murdoch’s News Corporation (which also owned The Weekly Standard) and to Genie Energy, with other board members named such as Jacob Rothschild and James Woolsey; Carlson’s overlap with Rockefeller- and Rothschild-linked networks is highlighted, including Charlie Rose’s Vanity Fair article about a Rothschild–Rockefeller merger and Rose’s program history. The speaker argues “these overlaps” explain why Carlson ridicules 9/11 skeptics and avoids addressing Rothschilds on his show, implying his gatekeeping role. A separate segment covers a Washington, DC climate-conspiracy joke by a city official about Rothschilds controlling the climate, followed by a joking discussion about microaggressions at UC Santa Cruz. Speaker 3 reiterates the claim that Carlson is “CIA?” and contends mainstream media is controlled, citing Operation Mockingbird as a precedent. The speaker concludes that even if direct government documentation isn’t present, Carlson’s numerous connections and the overlaps among the elites make his CIA linkage plausible to believe, urging viewers to do their own research and turn off the television. The transcript then shifts to a late-appearing discussion involving a Ron Paul event in Minneapolis (2008) with speakers debating 9/11, Building 7, and government involvement, with participants sharing mixed views on 9/11 conspiracy theories, evidence, and the appropriate stance on such claims. Towards the end, Steven Jones, a Brigham Young University physicist, offers a televised segment presenting a hypothesis that explosives might have contributed to the World Trade Center collapses, including Building 7, mentioning molten metal in basements, thermite, and a kink in the collapse symmetry, while acknowledging FEMA’s report noting only a low probability for the conventional (fire) hypothesis and calling for further investigation. The exchange ends with a brief acknowledgment of the need for follow-up by viewers. A final red-string/prophecy monologue introduces a biblical-tinged conspiracy frame involving “Jews” and “the red string,” Rahab the harlot, and spies, cutting off before a concluded point.

Speaker 0: Alleging not simply a cover up by the US government, but by the entire American media. It's totally implausible. Like, we would report that if that were true. Building 7 was not hit by an airplane. Speaker 3: That's seen Building 7 collapse, the Sallon Brothers building? No. I wanna show you that right now. Speaker 4: Now here, we're gonna show you a videotape of the collapse itself. Describe that feeling. Now we go to videotape the collapse of this building. It's amazing. Amazing. Speaker 3: I t's reminiscent of those pictures we've all seen too much on television before when a building was deliberately store destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down. No plane hit that building. Speaker 6: Well, it starts with Building 7. Yes. Where you look at that and it just yeah. I mean, this this is really weird. You know, it it does come down just like a, you know, building demolition type of project. When you start putting together at what temperature steel melts. They had molten steel in the twin towers, and I'm not sure we had a number seven. Speaker 0: I never questioned anything about nine eleven, and I actively attacked people who did. I'm ashamed of that, but that's a fact. Speaker 6: And, of course, the Overton window is is is is about this is what you can discuss without threat or without, you know, risk. And but you gotta go beyond that. Speaker 0: What began to make me wonder, I have no idea what happened in 09/11, but it's very clear that there's a lot of lying around it, was the collapse of Building 7. Speaker 0: because I was part of the cover up, and I feel guilty about it. That's why. And I'm trying to atone for my previous sense. That's the real reason. Speaker 0: I did it on tape more than once because my feeling was, well, you know, like, that's divisive or whatever. I was a child and an idiot.

The FBI and DOJ may have targeted Alex Jones because he predicted the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center. On 03/06/2001, Jones predicted the September 11th attack. Jones stated on 07/25/2001 that the government was planning terrorism and would blame a boogeyman like Osama Bin Laden, a known CIA asset. He specified the attack would take place in New York City, at the World Trade Center. The 9/11 commission did not interview Jones about his prediction. Tucker Carlson believes Donald Trump was elected partly on the promise of no more wars that don't help the U.S., and that Steve Witkoff has a good shot at peacefully resolving the conflict with Iran. Methyl blue is available at realalexjones.com.