TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I exposed the names and companies involved in trafficking children into the UK for pedophilia to the police, MI5, the National Crime Agency, and the government. Four weeks later, Leicestershire Police accused me of pedophilia and investigated me for four months, alleging I was a Freemason involved in ritualized child abuse, which was false. This was my punishment for raising the issue of systemic child abuse. The evidence came from two insiders in Ukraine, both of whom had car bombs planted; one died, and the other is in hiding. We will have to go public with this information. Next week, I should be able to make a very important announcement about holding those responsible for crimes against the people to account legally. The only politician who offered support when I was thrown out of the Conservative Party was Robert Kennedy Jr.

I went to cover a protest in my neighborhood as a journalist, but Hamas activists claimed my presence was a disturbance because I’m Jewish. The police sided with them, which I found outrageous. I refused to leave the sidewalk, asserting my rights as a citizen. While I was arrested, no charges were filed against me. This incident reflects a broader issue where peaceful citizens face harsh treatment while extremists are tolerated. The current climate is reminiscent of historical persecution, and it’s alarming to see free speech under attack. We must fight for our freedoms before it’s too late, as the erosion of rights is happening globally. The situation in Canada and the UK is dire, and we must remain vigilant against censorship and oppression.

Learning about being added to the terror watch list confirmed my suspicions about political retaliation, especially after my appearance on Fox News discussing Kamala Harris. The real stress comes from wondering how the government is surveilling me and what other lists I might be on. TSA's focus seems to be on covering their tracks rather than addressing the abuse of power. This situation aims to create a chilling effect on free speech, discouraging people from expressing their views. I'm pursuing legal action to uncover the truth about these secretive watch lists and ensure accountability. We must recognize the implications of this surveillance state and take action in the upcoming elections to protect our constitutional rights.

Why is the richest man in the world trying to undermine a democratically elected British government? This is concerning for democracy. Your party has sent activists to the U.S. to plot against Elon Musk's Twitter, led by Keir Starmer's chief of staff. Musk's interest in Starmer and the Labour Party seems to stem from their negative comments about him and Donald Trump. They dislike being criticized, especially regarding their failures with white working-class communities. Ultimately, it's about a wealthy individual attempting to disrupt democracy, which is wrong. Meanwhile, I've been focused on how the Labour Party is undermining free speech and expression.

I mentioned that incidents like mine could happen to anyone, especially in Pendleton near Salford Uni where many students live. There are sex offenders serving long sentences in the area. I have gathered evidence for 3 out of 4 elements of my case and am still working on the sexual assault aspect. I am determined to bring this to light.

I'm concerned about the optics of arresting someone flying a Union Jack. Think about the political implications for the nation. We don't want to incite a civil war by arresting an Englishman for flying his flag, especially when others seem to be supporting the October 7 attacks. Did the arrested man say any slogans? I can still speak to your prisoner and I've moved back.

In September, media outlets falsely labeled me a sex criminal without naming accusers. This was the culmination of a years-long campaign to silence my dissenting views on major geopolitical issues like the war in Ukraine. My critiques, while not pro-Russia, questioned Western involvement. This led to accusations of being a Chinese propagandist by a US government-linked organization. Subsequently, the UK government, connected to the CIA, pressured social media to censor and demonetize me. This coordinated attack, involving organizations funded by Big Pharma and government, reveals the suppression of independent media and dissenting voices. The open contest of ideas is a sham, with governments actively working to silence opposition, even using taxpayer money against their own citizens. My experience exposes the fragility of free speech and the lengths to which powerful entities will go to maintain control. The fight continues, and the stakes are high.

We need to focus on the real issue here, which is about the victims, not the Prime Minister. People are afraid to speak the truth due to concerns about being labeled racist. To prevent this from happening again, we must not let fear silence us. The Labour Party's adoption of the APPG definition of Islamophobia has created confusion, leading to innocent British Muslims being unfairly associated with negative stereotypes. A national inquiry is necessary to address this. Will the Prime Minister reconsider the Labour Party's definition of Islamophobia and its impact? I have consistently called out any factors that prevent victims from coming forward regarding violence against women, child abuse, or sexual exploitation. While some may call for further inquiry, I have been addressing these issues for many years.

I’ve just been informed that I’m being removed from my committees. Last week, I introduced a bill to eliminate sanctuary state protections for pedophiles in California, which the Democrats opposed. They cut off my microphone, and now the speaker of the state assembly has removed me from my committee. However, I see this as a badge of honor. It signifies that I’m doing the right thing by advocating for the people of this state and protecting children from being victimized by illegal immigrants. I’m ready for whatever comes next.

We're just turning the tables by asking legitimate questions, like how did these members of Congress get so rich? I might consider filing assault charges against Democrat members and their staff. The issue is that the DC District Attorney would have to bring those charges, and there's a clear double standard in D.C. It happened on federal property in D.C., so the D.C. District Attorney has jurisdiction. I have a right protected under the First Amendment to simply ask questions. I was the one taking the punches and pushes, not blocking anyone, just trying to get an answer. The only aggression is asking aggressive questions they don't like. I asked Ayanna Presley if she condoned FEMA sending $59 million to house illegals in New York City while people in North Carolina are in tents. I got a death stare. These Democrat congresspeople think they're gods, but I'm here in D.C. now, and I'll do this routinely.

Tom states he feels good despite being incarcerated since October in a country that doesn't believe in free speech, which he considers an occupational hazard for a citizen journalist. He claims that since he started speaking out against Islamic rape gangs 16 years ago, he has faced relentless attacks from the British state, which uses lawfare to silence him. He asserts that he has never been convicted by a jury and that every one of his convictions have been...

There's an issue in parliament when I face backlash for calling out a Labour MP I suspect is a pedophile. In Leicester, pedophilia has been rampant, highlighted by the Lord Jannah case, where he died just before a hearing. I've provided the government with names linked to child trafficking, but no action has been taken. The scale is significant, with numerous small airports being used for trafficking. I've shared details about money laundering and where children were taken under false pretenses, but it leads nowhere. These children are reportedly exploited in the sex trade for a few years before being subjected to organ harvesting. No one seems willing to address these serious issues.

I recently watched a 2010 interview of Tommy Robinson by Jeremy Paxman. Paxman, an educated presenter, confronted Robinson, a working-class man who initially fought against the system through the EDL but later distanced himself from it. Despite his past, the media continues to highlight it while ignoring serious issues like child abuse by individuals in powerful positions, such as the BBC's Jimmy Savile. Robinson is currently in jail for contempt of court, a victimless crime, while others with similar offenses receive lighter sentences. The systemic failures that allowed Pakistani grooming gangs to operate unchecked are alarming. Robinson attempted to raise awareness about these issues, and I view him as a political prisoner facing harsh treatment for speaking out against a corrupt system.

I went on TV to talk about grooming gangs in Telford, and police suddenly showed up at my door, claiming it was their duty to follow up. They had done nothing about the abuse for decades but decided to intimidate me after my interview. They said they were trying to make a difference, but it seemed like they were targeting a victim instead of the perpetrators. It's pathetic that criticizing them on TV drove them into action. I have no idea who ordered this "raid."

Everyone is eager to hear your story, especially regarding the 2024 election. You have firsthand experience, which gives you authority on the matter. Can you share what's causing you to lose sleep? I received a text from a lawyer who previously tried to remove me from the ballot ten years ago. He threatened to send a cease and desist if I don’t stop speaking out. This has caused me significant anxiety. Courage is about facing fear, so I'm trying to push through it. It's concerning that individuals within the system are legally threatening you. I reached out to him to clarify what I said that was untrue, and we discussed it. Ultimately, everything I stated was accurate; he just didn't want it presented in a clear way.

There's an issue in parliament when I face backlash for accusing a Labour MP of being a pedophile. In Leicester, we've had troubling cases, including the Lord Jannah incident. I've provided names linked to child trafficking to the government, but there's no action. It's a significant problem, with many involved. Children are being flown into small, unregulated airports in the UK. I've shared details about those laundering money and exploiting these children, who are misled into thinking they're going to school. They end up in the sex trade for a few years before being discarded for organ harvesting. No one seems interested in addressing this.

I haven't received official word from the Liberal Party about my disqualification. It's shocking that I learned about it from a news headline before receiving any direct communication. This is alarming. It speaks to the state of the Liberal Party that I'm finding out about my disqualification on air. It's not surprising, though. Our internal polls showed we were neck and neck with the frontrunner. They didn't want me on the debate stage or on the ballot because the Liberal Party of Canada wanted to complete the coronation of Mark Carney. All allegations are completely false and fabricated. I won't allow the Liberal Party of Canada or anyone to smear my name or the name of thousands of volunteers in our campaign.

I held an online forum to educate my constituents about their constitutional rights, specifically regarding protection against illegal search and seizure. My job is to share critical information with those I represent. Tom Homan was upset because he felt I was advising people here illegally, but I was advising all my constituents. Homan threatened to report me to the Department of Justice, but I haven't heard from them. I plan to reach out to the DOJ to ask if they intend to open an inquiry based on Homan's threats. I want to know if this administration intends to use political intimidation to silence its critics.

I'm being called a fascist for wanting to stop the war in Ukraine today. I'm against the needless deaths of hundreds of thousands of people and I'm looking for peace, not war. I didn't come here to be aggressive, but a member of parliament started screaming at me for asking a question, which is all on video. I'm just showing what's happening and exposing Charlie Angus for who he is: a member of parliament who screams and swears at Canadian citizens. He slanders people and wants to revoke citizenship of those he disagrees with, yet he calls me a fascist. This group surrounded and shouted me down for simply asking a question. Who are the real fascists here? I have it all on video.

The trial finished today, Tommy. "Turn the camera off for second." In a post-trial exchange, the speaker questions the claim that the case is contempt of court, insisting "There's no jury. That's only for juries. That's not contempt. That's a lie." They accuse the press of failing to report police unlawful conduct and say "Not one of them has reported any of the unlawful stuff the police done." They claim someone else "went to the judge to make sure Ezra will stop reporting" and that "He was the grass," acting as a journalist to silence reporting so "the only narrative you get is from them." They reference "fast car, cash in the cash in his car" and explain "I can't bank in The UK" after a demonstration. They remark that "They make you do vague answers" and note "He asked me one question. Where are you going? Benedum."

I exposed the names and companies involved in trafficking children into the UK for pedophilia to the police, MI5, the National Crime Agency, and the government. Instead of investigating, Leicestershire Police accused me of pedophilia and investigated me for four months, alleging I was a Freemason involved in ritualized child abuse, which was false. This was my punishment for raising the issue. The evidence came from two Ukrainian secret service agents who provided the same information about 9,000 missing children from Donbas. After passing this information to the National Crime Agency, someone at a company we implicated checked out my associate's LinkedIn profile. Car bombs were planted under the cars of both Ukrainian agents; one died, and the other is in hiding. We will have to go public with the evidence. Next week, I should be able to make a very important announcement about holding those responsible for crimes against the people to account legally.

I've traveled to over 60 countries in my life and have never incited violence or terrorism. I abhor violence and have no criminal record. It's absurd to hear a government representative claim I'm a threat to the Netherlands. I am banned from most of Europe for agreeing to speak at a peace rally two years ago. This situation raises questions about whether the judiciary protects citizens from government abuse or serves the government's interests. If it's the latter, the Netherlands is no longer a liberal democracy but a tyranny. I've been accused of threatening democracy, yet the current prime minister is unelected and has never faced a ballot. This entire situation is a farce. I have nothing more to add.

Lucy Connolly describes being banned from traveling and required to stay in the UK, feeling it is authoritarian and that she is still being controlled by the state. She explains she must attend probation every week and is at MAPPA level three, which applies to sex offenders and terrorists. MAPPA stands for multi-agency public protection; it involves a police department and a press department, making her not just answerable to probation but to “a mapper,” a system that she finds insane. The stated reason is press interest due to her high profile, so she must seek probation’s permission for everything. She must obtain signed-off permission to go anywhere with more than 50 people and to attend events or conferences. For example, she is going to Parliament tomorrow to watch the debate Rupert Lowe set up about not using prison as a punishment for people who post on social media, and she has had to seek permission to attend that, approved by probation. Essentially, everything she does is controlled by them. Speaker 0 expresses astonishment, noting that Lucy is effectively grouped with sex offenders and others “in the same bag,” due to that tweet. Lucy confirms she feels she is being made an example of to a high degree. She references a recent incident she would not detail, where probation questioned her about drinking, insisting the incident was nothing to do with her and that someone had gone to the press, which then went through MAPPA to probation. She says it became a big deal because it involved her, Lucy Connolly. Lucy notes the situation is wearing her down: “I’m not gonna lie, but I just smile and nod and, you know, and go along with it because what choice do I have?” The discussion highlights the ongoing constraints, surveillance, and alleged media-driven scrutiny she faces under MAPPA, despite not being the person at fault in the cited incident.

Why is the richest man in the world trying to undermine a democratically elected British government? That's concerning for democracy. Your party sent activists to America to plot against Elon Musk's Twitter, which raises questions about why Musk is interested in Keir Starmer and the Labour Party. Labour MPs have made negative comments about figures like Trump and Musk, and they don’t appreciate being insulted. They will respond when they feel disrespected, especially regarding issues affecting working-class communities. Ultimately, it’s about the richest man trying to undermine democracy, and that should be alarming. Meanwhile, I've been focusing on how the Labour Party is undermining free speech and expression.

A week ago, my lawyer informed me that two of my tweets are technically illegal, and I could face arrest upon returning home. This isn't a joke; prisons are being cleared to make room for people charged over social media posts. For instance, someone is currently serving three months for a Facebook meme, and a woman is facing two and a half years for a tweet. Free speech is in serious jeopardy, which is alarming not just in England but across Europe. This situation is incredibly concerning.