reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Trump's approach could involve dismantling a significant portion of the bureaucratic structure, particularly targeting the entrenched officials in government. For instance, the Department of Education could be eliminated, allowing funds to be redirected to states for local decision-making. The question arises: how many bureaucrats in Washington have actually taught children in places like Claiborne County, Tennessee? This bureaucratic system contributes to the ongoing increase in national debt, with neither political party offering a viable plan to address it. Instead, they seem more focused on personal gain rather than fiscal responsibility.

The massive bloat in government spending allows politicians to hide their pet projects. For example, Stacey Abrams' climate group, with a revenue of only $100, is slated to receive $2 billion. There's outrage over Elon Musk's team accessing IRS data, yet the Biden administration allowed 53 unpaid researchers and students full access to the American people's data at the IRS. They're okay with waste, fraud, and abuse as long as their special interest groups are funded and their ideology is promoted, regardless of the will of the American people. Our country can't survive this. We are thankful that Donald Trump and his team are saying enough is enough and will begin the process of restoring a constitutional republic.

We are going to Washington DC. Eight years ago, Trump promised to drain the swamp, referring to the Washington bureaucracy. However, under his presidency, government size increased, with more employees and nearly doubled spending, contributing to a soaring budget deficit. Programs like the farmers to families food box cost taxpayers billions. Despite claiming to empower women and cutting some spending, many initiatives only expanded the swamp. Once government programs are established, they are hard to eliminate, creating new lobbyists and constituencies. Trump acknowledged the swamp's depth but continues to promise to drain it if re-elected. Critics argue that increasing government jobs contradicts the goal of draining the swamp, suggesting privatization as a better solution. Ultimately, government control over many sectors leads to inefficiency, and real change requires reducing government involvement.

We're going to run the federal government like a business: money in, money out. We'll focus spending on what advances America's interests. That's our goal. Anything else is fear-mongering by the left, who lack a real message and are, frankly, deranged.

Crooked Joe Biden has wasted trillions of taxpayer dollars, causing uncontrolled inflation that is hurting working families. To stop inflation and rescue the economy, we must rein in Biden's spending. However, the burden should fall on special interests and Washington bureaucrats, not American families and seniors. The president should have the power to stop unnecessary spending, as Thomas Jefferson and other presidents did. The Impoundment Control Act of 1974 curtailed this power, which is unconstitutional and violates the separation of powers. When I return to the White House, I will challenge this act in court and use impoundment to save money and reduce taxes. We won't touch Medicare or Social Security, and the funds saved can strengthen these programs. Restoring impoundment will also help control spending, balance the budget, and eliminate the deep state and globalists from our government. I alone can make America great again.

The people want an active government that doesn't waste money. To deliver change, we're reorganizing the government to save taxpayer dollars. We're cutting the federal bureaucracy by 100,000 positions through attrition and reducing administrative costs by 12%. Unproductive advisory commissions will be eliminated, and agencies can't create new ones without approval. Government regulations and procurement rules hurt the system, so we will cut waste, streamline bureaucracy, and change these rules to make government work better. This includes downsizing the government, improving customer service, and overhauling federal procurement and personnel systems. The goal is to make government work for the people, eliminate unnecessary programs, and reduce the federal workforce. We're committed to cutting spending and reducing the deficit to ensure a stronger economy for the future.

The federal government isn't a company to dismantle. It requires constitutional adherence, not a Shark Tank takeover approach. The government is fat and hasn't been scrutinized in a century. An individual is willing to do this work for free, but isn't cutting enough. In private equity, when dealing with a broken company, you cut deep and fast, then rehire. He should cut 20% more. It's all fat and waste. You can't be surgically precise, you have to cut more because you don't know. We've never audited government for a hundred years.

The speaker expresses disbelief at being involved but feels compelled to address the growing $2 trillion federal budget deficit. The speaker's "wake up call" was realizing that interest payments on the national debt now exceed the Defense Department budget. The speaker fears that if the debt issue isn't addressed, the U.S. will be servicing debt indefinitely, leaving no funds for other priorities. The speaker states the goal is to prevent American bankruptcy. Despite difficulties managing other businesses, the speaker is focused on making government more efficient and eliminating waste and fraud, reporting good progress so far.

The goal is to restore democracy by fixing the feedback loop between the people and the government. We can't have a democracy if the bureaucracy is in charge and unresponsive to the public's elected representatives. The bureaucracy has become an unconstitutional branch of government with too much power. We also need to address the $2 trillion deficit, which threatens to bankrupt the country. Interest payments on the national debt exceed the defense budget. It's essential to reduce federal expenses to keep America solvent. We've found odd instances of bureaucrats with modest salaries accumulating tens of millions in net worth. Basic controls are missing, leading to blank checks being issued without categorization or explanation. Payments are made to entities on the "do not pay" list. We need common-sense controls to ensure taxpayer dollars are spent wisely and to address issues like Social Security payments to 150-year-olds.

The previous administration favored big government and did not make efforts to reduce regulations or spending. However, the new administration could argue that their actions comply with a Supreme Court decision requiring the unwinding of certain regulations deemed unconstitutional. This involves addressing regulations, spending, and personnel simultaneously. There are innovative strategies being developed to tackle these issues. Many former government officials express skepticism, believing that achieving these goals is impossible.

I didn't hear any mention of spending or national debt, which is concerning. We need to control spending to address broader issues. The national debt is a symptom of the nanny state, which consists of three parts: the entitlement state, the regulatory state, and the foreign policy nanny state. To tackle the entitlement state, we should attach work requirements to government aid. For the regulatory state, we need to reduce the number of federal bureaucrats and eliminate unconstitutional regulations. Lastly, we should implement zero-based budgeting for federal expenditures, including foreign aid. By dismantling these areas of unnecessary spending, we can effectively address the national debt and restore self-governance in the country. The focus should be on these root causes, as resolving them will lead to a healthier economy and civic responsibility.

Speaker 0 argues that Trump is entirely expendable, claiming that bankers installed him to advance a control grid and that he has, in their view, successfully helped build and promote it rapidly. The speakers frame the US as a simple system where the economy runs off federal credit, with 40 to 50 percent of income in any county directly or indirectly coming from federal credit, describing the country’s economy as Soviet-like and highly centralized. They contend this centralization has contributed to a rise in billionaires who benefit from government contracts and purchases, and they explain the federal budget dynamic: annually, the federal government has about $6 trillion in expenses and $4 trillion in revenues, leaving $2 trillion supposedly tied to the central banking money machine, which is presented as the mechanism that controls the system. The discussion then outlines a plan or framework for what is termed the control grid, consisting of three general baskets: (1) programmable money, (2) digital ID (which is said to be required to implement programmable money), and (3) the hardware and software infrastructure to support a social credit system and surveillance. They emphasize the need for data centers and, importantly, a surveillance and enforcement infrastructure to back these components. On how to persuade the population to accept this infrastructure, the speakers say the strategy is to frame issues like election fraud and immigration as justification for a digital ID to identify everyone and prevent fraud. They claim that borders and elections existed before digital technology, but that the messaging has convinced conservatives and heartland voters to embrace the new system, portraying it as necessary. They also reference a private army, ICE with detention centers across the country, described as enforcing without constitutional protections to remove “hardened criminal immigrants,” but they assert the underlying purpose is to manage the control grid rather than merely deport individuals. The speaker asserts that Trump, having secured a large funding bill and set precedent for data centers, has effectively laid the groundwork for this system, and concludes that Trump is now expendable because the necessary conditions to implement the control grid are in place.

Joe Biden has wasted a trillion dollars in less than three years, causing inflation that hurts working families. To stop inflation and save the economy, we need to cut spending, but not at the expense of American families and seniors. The president should have the power to refuse unnecessary spending, as Thomas Jefferson did. The Impoundment Control Act of 1974, which curtailed this power, is unconstitutional and needs to be challenged. When I return to the White House, I will fight to overturn this act and use impoundment to save money. This will not affect national defense, Medicare, or Social Security. The funds saved can even be used to strengthen Medicare and Social Security. Impoundment will also help control spending and eliminate the deep state and globalists from our government. It's a pro-growth, pro-American, and pro-freedom policy that only I can accomplish.

A major goal of this presidency is restoring democracy. True democracy requires a strong feedback loop between the people and their government. Currently, an unelected bureaucracy holds excessive power, undermining the will of the people and elected officials. This is unconstitutional and needs to be corrected. We must also address the massive national deficit—currently exceeding $2 trillion—to prevent national bankruptcy. The interest on this debt surpasses our defense budget, a shocking reality. Reducing federal spending is not optional; it's essential for the nation's solvency and its ability to serve its citizens.

In just under a month, the Department of Government Efficiency has already saved over $55 billion, and this is only the beginning. We're on track to eliminate trillions of dollars in waste, which will lead to significantly lower inflation and interest rates. This will also result in reduced payments on mortgages, credit cards, and car loans, and a much stronger stock market. I anticipate the stock market performing exceptionally well. Our strategy involves rapidly expanding the economy by significantly reducing the size of the federal government, and this is a crucial step we must take.

Joe Biden's economic policies have been disastrous, leading to high inflation and bank failures. I believe he is leading us towards a great depression. We need to fix the economy quickly by unleashing energy production, reducing regulations, and repealing Biden's tax hikes. I have successfully built the greatest economy in history, and now we will have to do it again. Thank you.

A significant goal of this presidency is to restore democracy by fixing the feedback loop between the people and the government. Currently, an autonomous bureaucracy often overrides the will of elected representatives, which contradicts the essence of democracy where the public, through the president, house, and senate, should decide what happens. Additionally, we must address the $2 trillion deficit. The interest payments on the national debt now exceed the defense budget, which is unsustainable. Reducing federal expenses isn't optional; it's essential for America's solvency. Without addressing this, we risk bankrupting the country and losing the resources needed to serve our citizens, because we will be stuck servicing vast amounts of debt.

The speaker states that supporting US consumers is the reason for their actions, which are part of the dollar being a reserve currency. Regarding the US fiscal situation, the speaker acknowledges that US federal debt is on an unsustainable path, but not at an unsustainable level currently, and the limit is unknown. They state that the US is running very large deficits at full employment, which needs to be addressed sooner rather than later. The largest and fastest-growing parts of federal spending are Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and interest payments, requiring bipartisan solutions. Domestic discretionary spending is a small and declining percentage of federal spending.

The speaker expresses concern about $2,000,000,000,000 deficits, claiming they are destroying the future for children and grandchildren, contrasting them with previous $400,000,000,000 deficits. They state Donald Trump cares about balancing the budget, which they believe will lower interest rates. The speaker suggests the world leans on and breathes off the U.S. economy, which has a $29,000,000,000,000 GDP and consumes $20,000,000,000 a year. They propose that since the U.S. buys everyone's goods and services, other countries should pay a "membership fee." They suggest reducing or eliminating taxes, including taxes on tips, overtime, and Social Security. The speaker claims Trump's goal is no tax for anyone making less than $150,000 a year.

All government spending is taxation, either directly or through inflation. The Department of Government Efficiency will address wasted money. The goal is to get the government out of people's pocketbooks, leading America to unprecedented heights and an amazing future. The speaker expresses enthusiasm for the positive energy present.

Prolonged peacetime leads to increased bureaucracy and government growth. Regulations multiply yearly, and war historically serves as a necessary, albeit undesirable, reset. To avoid this, we've created a Department of Government Efficiency. We'll streamline regulations at the executive level, requiring Congressional consent for law changes. Our goal is to eliminate harmful regulations, downsize government, and balance the budget. This is incredibly difficult; past attempts have failed, and we may not succeed this time.

In under a month, the Department of Government Efficiency has already saved over $55 billion, and this is only the beginning. We're targeting trillions of dollars in waste, which will lead to significantly lower inflation and interest rates. This will also bring down payments on mortgages, credit cards, and car loans, while boosting the stock market. I believe the stock market is going to perform exceptionally well. Our strategy involves rapidly growing the economy by dramatically reducing the size of the federal government, a necessary step for our nation's prosperity.

The American people are sick of the lies, cheating, and spending. We're seeing the climax of living beyond our means, fueled by the dollar's reserve currency status. The country is bankrupt, morally and financially, with moral bankruptcy leading to abuse of power. Some in Congress want to cut back spending, but there are loopholes. Congress is not doing its job by passing appropriation bills. Trump is asking Republicans to vote for a bill that largely maintains current spending levels, with an additional $8 billion for military spending. They are always trying to kick the can down the road, they are not cutting spending. The whole system is massive, abused, and immoral. It's going to take some time to fix this issue.

The federal government isn't a company to dismantle like on Shark Tank; it must be run constitutionally, and the current administration is restoring services and jobs that have been disrupted. The government is fat and hasn't been scrutinized for a century. Finally, someone is willing to address the waste. However, cuts aren't deep enough. In private equity, when fixing a bankrupt company, you must cut severely and quickly, even 20% more than initially planned, then rehire to minimize trauma. There's so much waste in the federal government that needs addressing. You can't be surgically precise when auditing the government. You have to cut more because you don't know where all the waste is. We've never audited the government before.

The discussion centers on Elon Musk's efforts to cut government spending, starting with foreign aid, and the challenges of reforming the federal bureaucracy. Despite Musk's attempts, even eliminating USAID would only affect a small portion of the budget. Examples of wasteful spending are highlighted, such as studies on male parents attracting females, finger snapping, and Neil Armstrong's moon landing quote. The conversation shifts to larger potential cuts, including subsidies to state and local governments and the sale of unused federal land and buildings. The difficulty of firing federal workers is noted, and the need to address major spending programs like Medicare and Social Security is emphasized. While some cuts have been made, such as ending DEI programs, deeper reforms are needed to change the trajectory of the national debt. Bureaucratic regulations, exemplified by SpaceX's environmental impact studies, also hinder economic growth.