reSee.it - Related Video Feed

We're all talking about something here which isn't happening. I've heard time and time again members here talk of c o two as a pollutant. A pollutant is a life giving natural gas. It gives me the impression that some of our members haven't had the benefit of a formal education. Isn't this really just about the state being able to get its hand in ordinary people's trouser pocket to still get more tax from them? Isn't this all about political control? Isn't all this about politics and big business? The whole thing's a sham. This bogus hypothesis, this ridiculous nonsense that man made c o two is causing global warming. Enough, please, before we damage irrevocably the global economy.

In Denmark, cows are reportedly dying and producing less milk because BeauVer has been added to cattle food. BeauVer was mandated to be added to the food in Denmark from 10/01/2025, and farmers are now reporting reduced milk production, with some cows becoming sick and needing euthanasia. An official investigation into the substance has been launched. The speaker notes this issue ties to a broader narrative they discussed previously, accusing climate advocates of pushing to add bovine additives so cows would fart and burp less. According to the speaker, Bill Gates is behind promoting substances like Bovar, arguing the goal is to move toward synthetic beef and to stop cows from farting and burping. The speaker claims it is now mandatory to add Bovar on all farms in Denmark, and asserts that it has negative effects on cows, with an official investigation underway. The speaker urges stopping this “craziness” and retreating from meddling with nature, arguing the agenda aims to attack humans by having bovir enter human tissues through consumption. They claim bovir contains a substance called tree n o p that attacks human fertility. The speaker connects these events to a broader transhumanism and elite agenda to hijack human evolution and create synthetic humans, including lab-born babies. They indicate there is much more to discuss on this topic and mention giving an in-depth lecture in November, with a link in the comments. In summary, the main points asserted are: BeauVer is being added to Danish cattle feed since 10/01/2025, resulting in cow health problems and reduced milk output; an official investigation is underway; the speaker attributes the policy to climate-change activism and Bill Gates, claiming it aims to reduce cattle methane emissions; they claim bovir/bovar is harmful to humans through tissue exposure and fertility impacts, tying this to a transhumanist agenda; a forthcoming lecture is promised with more details.

Speaker 0 says they are not making the claim up, but refers to a University of Nebraska study stating that one way to save the world on carbon is to raise more cows. Speaker 0 claims cows are “carbon negative,” producing more oxygen than they put off methane and carbon. Speaker 0 then says this implies people should eat more cheeseburgers or steaks, or eat more beans, “to save the world.”

They manipulate crises to push agendas, like blaming cows for climate issues. The elite claim it's for the greater good, but it's just a tactic to control and silence people. Throughout history, political leaders have never truly cared for regular folks, and that hasn't changed now.

I don't use unproven approaches like planting trees to address the climate issue. Some people believe that planting enough trees can solve the problem, but that's nonsense. Are we the science people or the idiots?

Cows are not major contributors to climate change. They eat grass, which absorbs carbon dioxide, and their methane emissions come from the carbon in the grass. Industries like transportation and electricity generation are bigger culprits. Cows have been part of a natural cycle for millions of years, providing humans with nutritious food. Raising cows regeneratively can benefit both humans and the planet, despite attempts to blame them for climate change.

- Climate change is a fact. - Humans are not causing it. - The cow farts. It's not the cows. - NASA knows this. - Over 90% of the c o two, there is an increase in c o two. - Is there more c o two in the atmosphere now than there was ten years, twenty, fifty, a hundred years ago? The answer is absolutely yes. - Is it a bad thing? The answer is no. - Is it the most we've ever had? We're right about four forty parts per million right now. - The oceans are warming from underneath, not from the top. Warm water holds less gas.

The speaker discusses the opposition to farming practices in the Netherlands, which are blamed for climate change. They argue that it doesn't make sense to blame agriculture when it has been a successful industry for centuries. The speaker questions the proposed alternatives, such as wind turbines, solar panels, and synthetic foods, which they view as a manufactured and unnatural solution. They believe that these alternatives are not as beneficial for the environment as the cows grazing in the fields. The speaker concludes by stating that deep down, everyone knows that the opposition's claims are false.

Climate change is being portrayed as a pervasive issue, with schools, parents, and universities promoting it as a new religion. However, the speaker questions the understanding of climate change, pointing out that it is often equated with carbon emissions. They clarify that carbon is an element found in various substances, including carbon dioxide. The speaker argues that carbon dioxide, which comprises only 0.04% of the atmosphere, is being exaggerated as a problem. They question the need to disrupt the economy and increase energy prices based on such a small percentage. The speaker urges people to challenge this perspective and fight against what they perceive as intellectual nonsense.

Cows are a significant source of global emissions, contributing about 6 percent due to methane, a potent greenhouse gas. It is essential to find ways to reduce the environmental impact of cows.

They've blocked the sun, it's unbelievable. You're either a paid troll or dangerously ignorant. Blue skies this morning, now covered.

I used to trust the news until I discovered a brain for common sense. A brain helps with stupidity, questioning news sources, and thinking independently. Side effects may include accountability and a better understanding of economics. Choose a brain for reality. Visit tryabrain.com for more information. Translation: I used to trust the news until I discovered a brain for common sense. A brain helps with stupidity, questioning news sources, and thinking independently. Side effects may include accountability and a better understanding of economics. Choose a brain for reality. Visit tryabrain.com for more information.

The University of Nebraska's study suggests that raising more cows could help combat carbon emissions because cows are carbon negative, producing more oxygen than methane and carbon. Eating more cheeseburgers or steaks could potentially save the world.

In Denmark, cows are reportedly dying and producing less milk after Beauvair was added to their food. The transcript claims Beauvair was mandated to be added to food in Denmark starting October 1, 2025, and that farmers have since reported that cows are producing less milk and that some cows have become sick. The transcript says some farmers have had to euthanize cows and that the farmers believe Beauvair is the cause. The speaker says this topic was discussed previously and describes Beauvair as a substance that “these crazy, climate people want to add to the food so the cows would fart and burp, burp less.” The speaker frames the policy as “hijack[ing] nature,” asserting that natural processes like farting and burping are being targeted in the name of climate change. The speaker also says an official investigation has been launched into the substance. The transcript identifies Bill Gates as being behind Beauvair and similar efforts, asserting that Gates promotes substances like Bovair because he wants “synthetic beef” and wants cows “to stop farting and burping.” The speaker states that the mandate in Denmark has a “bad effect” on cows and says the investigation should stop the “meddling with nature.” The transcript further claims that Beauvair (and a substance within it) affects humans after people consume it. It says the substance gets into tissues that humans eat and claims that Beauvair has been “proven to attack human fertility.” The transcript specifies that a component called “3-NOP” attacks human fertility. The speaker connects these claims to an alleged broader agenda, describing it as part of “transhumanism” and a push to create “synthetic humans,” including attempting to create babies in labs. The speaker portrays the effort as “bigger than this,” describing it as an “elite agenda” to take over human evolution and “basically [attack] us” to “dehumanize not only the animals but also us.” The speaker says they are doing a lecture at the end of November and that viewers can find a link in the comments to discuss the topic in depth.

Frogs aren't gay. We support accuracy and apologize for past actions. Please allow us back on Twitter and Google. Thank you, tech leader.

The Norwegian people and farmers are “f***ing pissed,” according to the speaker, about a Norwegian law affecting farmers and cows. The speaker says the chemical Beauvais—Norwegian politicians “just forced” farmers to give their cows—is partially owned by the Norwegian Oil Fund (the pension fund) and that the second-largest shareholder is BlackRock. The speaker claims BlackRock owns about half the world. The speaker states that Norwegian politicians will require farmers to add a methane-reducing chemical to cow feed by 2027 to receive government support. The speaker says the law passed despite 40,000 Norwegians signing petitions to stop it, along with farmers and veterinarians saying the proposal is “nonsense.” Farmers are described as complaining they will need to use protective gloves and masks when adding the chemicals to feed. The speaker says this is a chemical that many studies claim does not enter milk, while “no long-term studies exist” on the health of cows or people. The speaker estimates the cost at about $100 (or 1,000 Norwegian kroner) per cow per year, and claims this would create an industry of about $2 billion in Europe. The speaker adds that Denmark already requires Bover on “old mill cows” from 2025. They also claim studies show grass-fed or eco-farms have less emissions due to less fuel and feed cost. The speaker concludes by asserting that Europe is “world-leading” in making rules nobody wants and characterizes the policy as part of a “green industry” that large corporations can profit from, potentially making food more expensive.

Speaker 0: The University of Nebraska just completed a study stating the way to save the world on carbon is to raise more cows. Cows are carbon negative; they produce more oxygen than they emit as methane and carbon. The takeaway is to eat more cheeseburgers or steaks to save the world.

We are in a domain where the official authorities, emanating from the United Nations, lie blatantly. They are not a scientific organization, but an ideological one. For thirty years, we have lived in this misunderstanding and impossibility of reducing our CO2 emissions. What we are doing, with billions and billions of dollars, is useless. We are fortunate to live in a climate optimum. The so-called catastrophic warming is a lie. The temperature has actually decreased in the last eight years. The IPCC claims that warming is accelerating, but it is a lie. Weather events occur every day, but the weather varies as it always has. In the past, during the time of the dinosaurs, there was ten times more CO2, and it was not a catastrophe. CO2 is life, and more CO2 means more life.

Speaker 0 shares a racist online comment they received: "If her parents did not immigrate here, she would be sleeping in cow shit with no rights, the irony." Speaker 0 asks their mother to react to the comment. The mother asks for clarification, then states that they did have cows in their house, so it's not a big deal.

Kuwait is the problem, not the burning tires. There are 42 million tires burning in the desert. The issue lies in the cow farm and anything in the west. It's always America that needs to cut back, not kill livestock or stop growing food.

I'm amazed by the number of people here who don't notice the jet trails spreading into cloud formations, blocking out the sun. This dimming effect is intentional and called "dimming." Happy 4th of July, but they are dimming us heavily. There are hardly any natural clouds in the distance. Have a good day. Translation: I am surprised by how many people are here and don't notice the jet trails spreading into cloud formations that block out the sun. This dimming effect is intentional and called "dimming." Happy 4th of July, but they are dimming us heavily. There are hardly any natural clouds in the distance. Have a good day.

Alex Jones posted about secret societies in America in the 90s. I shared it without supporting him. People focused on that post, showing how our world operates. I'm not here to complain, just to exist. Translation: Alex Jones posted about secret societies in America in the 90s. I shared it without supporting him. People focused on that post, showing how our world operates. I'm not here to complain, just to exist.

Norwegian people and farmers are described as being “f***ing pissed” about Norwegian politicians’ forced use of a chemical called Beauvais in cow feed. The transcript claims Beauvais is partially owned by the Norwegian Oil Fund (the pension fund) and that BlackRock is the second biggest shareholder, adding that they own about half the world. The transcript says politicians will force farmers to add a methane-reducing chemical to their cow feed by 2027 if they want to receive government support. It states the law passed despite 40,000 Norwegians signing petitions to stop the law, along with comments from farmers and veterinarians calling it “nonsense.” Farmers’ complaints mentioned include that they will have to use protective gloves and masks to add the chemical to feed. The transcript also says the chemical is claimed by “most studies” not to enter milk, while adding that no long-term studies exist on the health of cows or humans. Cost and market impact are stated as around $100 or 1,000 Norwegian kroner per cow per year, and the transcript estimates this creates a $2 billion industry just in Europe. It also states that in Denmark, Bover is already required for “old mill cows” starting in 2025. The transcript contrasts this with research it cites claiming grass-fed or eco-farms have less emissions due to less fuel and feed cost, presenting this as a solution that would always be better for the environment. It concludes by saying Europe is “world-leading” in making “dumb rules” nobody wants, and claims the regulations could create another “green industry” for large corporations to profit from, making food more expensive.

He turned on the camera to show a flat edge in the sky, pointing out a chemtrail nearby. He emphasized that all the trails were chemtrails, but then pointed out a real condensation trail. The speaker ended by calling the viewers "poor deluded bastards." Translation: The speaker pointed out different types of trails in the sky, claiming they were all chemtrails except for one that was a condensation trail. They expressed disbelief at the viewers' perspective.

Red meat, specifically cows, is not responsible for climate change. Cows eat grass, which helps regenerate the land. While they do emit methane through burping, the carbon in that methane comes from the grass they consume, which in turn absorbs atmospheric carbon dioxide through photosynthesis. Cows are part of a natural cycle that has existed for millions of years, along with other ruminant animals like bison and elk. According to a 2016 EPA graphic, cows are not the highest emitters of carbon dioxide or its equivalents. Industries like transportation, electricity generation, coal burning, and technology are the major culprits. Properly raising cows in a regenerative manner can provide humans with high-quality food while not significantly contributing to climate change.