reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In 2015, a 153-page agreement between Moderna and the US government reveals collaboration with Dr. Barrick on mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates. The NIH co-owns the vaccine, as shown in the agreement. This predates current events and raises questions about ulterior motives.

The speaker discusses the layers of liability protection surrounding COVID-19 vaccines and questions why they are necessary if the vaccines are safe and effective. They mention a case against EcoHealth Alliance for allegedly creating the virus in a Wuhan lab with the help of the DOD and CIA. The speaker presents evidence, including military medical records, suggesting that COVID-19 may have been developed years before its official timeline. They also mention Pfizer documents discussing shedding and a study protocol related to gene therapy. The speaker emphasizes the need for further investigation into the involvement of the DOD and CIA and presents their evidence for consideration.

The speaker discusses the potential dangers of vaccines, claiming that they can cause vaccine-induced AIDS and other health issues. They mention that the military is testing members for AIDS and sickle cell, as vaccines can alter red blood cells. The speaker also mentions a significant increase in morbidity and mortality in 2021, but the numbers have been manipulated. They talk about the difficulty of tracking the number of pilots who can no longer fly due to health issues. The conversation then shifts to whether the military can determine if members have actually received the vaccine, mentioning the presence of luciferase in Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, which can be detected through mass spectrometry. The speaker concludes by stating that those who refuse the vaccine are being processed out.

The speakers discuss a document released by court order in 2021, which analyzes adverse event reports related to Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine. They mention the large number of diagnoses during the preliminary phase of the study, expressing concern about the speed at which these diagnoses were made. They emphasize the importance of allowing individuals to choose whether or not to receive the vaccine, especially in the military. One speaker highlights the high number of adverse events associated with the vaccine, suggesting it indicates a significant safety issue. They explain that the vaccine is a genetic product that can affect every organ in the body, making it different from traditional medications. The speakers also mention the impact of vaccine mandates on healthcare workers and describe the militarization of public health.

A year ago, the speaker requested data from Emma, including all clinical trials done by medical companies before they requested marketing authorization for the green certificate. Regarding Pfizer, the speaker notes the company submitted a clinical trial that started on January 14, 2020. The speaker questioned a Pfizer representative about how tests for the vaccine began so soon after the December 2019 emergence of COVID-19, but the representative declined to answer. The speaker also asked the CEO of Moderna how they submitted trials since 2017, years before the virus was discovered in the winter of 2019. The speaker states that the CEO of Moderna did not answer how this was possible. The speaker says these are legitimate questions that people are asking, but unfortunately, the companies are declining to answer.

The speaker claims the DOD distributed COVID-19 vaccines and required absolute immunity, making it difficult to sue for damages without proving intentionality. They have a potential RICO claim, but litigation costs are prohibitive. They question why liability shields are needed if the vaccines are safe and effective. The speaker alleges EcoHealth Alliance and the CCP created SARS-CoV-2 in a Wuhan lab with the DOD or CIA's knowledge. They cite a study showing a 12 nucleotide sequence in a Moderna patent matching SARS-CoV-2, suggesting the disease was developed in the mid-2010s. The speaker presents military medical records showing a soldier receiving COVID-19 immunizations by Moderna in 2014, raising questions about the true history of COVID-19 and Operation Warp Speed. They claim the DOD and CIA were involved and asks to what extent and for how long. They also state they can show Pfizer documents discussing shedding and a study protocol based on oncolytic gene products for gene therapy shedding.

In 2015, a 153-page confidential agreement between Moderna and the US government is discussed. The agreement reveals collaboration between the NIH, Moderna, and Dr. Barrick on mRNA technology for a coronavirus vaccine. The government co-owns the vaccine candidates developed, raising questions about ulterior motives. This predates any current political affiliations.

This transcript discusses a confidential agreement between Moderna and the US government dating back to 2015. It notes "Frankenstein coronavirus" and that "the NIH and Moderna were collaborating with Doctor. Barrick" with "His signature is on page 106 of the material transfer agreement." It says "the NIH appears to be transferring the mRNA tech to Doctor. Barrick." It asserts "'mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates developed and jointly owned by the NIAID and Moderna.'" The transcript also states "'the government co owns the vaccine.'" It adds "'This is not part of that.'" It emphasizes "This is 2015." It concludes with "The same government that is now mandating its use owns the vaccine. You better share that one quick. Don't know how long it's gonna last."

In this video, the speaker discusses a confidential agreement between Moderna and the US government, spanning 153 pages. The agreement dates back to 2015, when the Frankenstein coronavirus was first discovered. The NIH and Moderna collaborated with Doctor Barrick, as shown on page 106 of the agreement. The NIH appears to be transferring mRNA technology to Doctor Barrick, while also jointly owning the mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates developed with Moderna. The speaker finds it surprising that the government co-owns the vaccine, especially considering they are now mandating its use. It is important to note that this agreement predates any current political context.

The speaker discusses the layers of liability protection surrounding COVID-19 vaccines and questions why they are necessary if the vaccines are safe and effective. They mention a case against EcoHealth Alliance for allegedly creating the virus in a Wuhan lab with the help of the DOD and CIA. The speaker presents evidence, including military medical records, suggesting that COVID-19 may have been developed years before its official timeline. They also mention Pfizer documents discussing shedding and a study protocol related to gene therapy. The speaker emphasizes the need for further investigation into the involvement of the DOD and CIA and presents their evidence without drawing conclusions.

The speaker claims the DOD distributed COVID-19 vaccines and required absolute immunity, making the DOD the target for lawsuits, which would be difficult to win without the data they are hiding. They believe EcoHealth Alliance created SARS CoV-2 in the Wuhan lab with the DOD or CIA's approval, transferring the necessary technology to the CCP. A study showed a 12 nucleotide sequence in a Moderna patent from 2016 perfectly matched SARS CoV-2, suggesting the disease was developed in the mid-2010s. The speaker presents military medical records showing a soldier receiving COVID-19 immunizations by Moderna in 2014, suggesting the need to investigate the real history of COVID. They also claim to have Pfizer documents discussing shedding and a Komunardi approval agreeing to a study based on oncolytic gene products for gene therapy shedding.

The speaker discusses the potential dangers of vaccines, claiming that they can cause vaccine-induced AIDS and other health issues. They mention that the military is testing members for AIDS and sickle cell, as vaccines can alter red blood cells. The speaker also mentions a significant increase in morbidity and mortality in 2021, but the numbers have been manipulated. They talk about the difficulty of tracking pilots who can no longer fly due to health issues. The conversation then shifts to whether the military can determine if members have actually received the vaccine, mentioning the presence of luciferase in Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. This bioluminescent ingredient allows third parties to verify vaccination status. The speaker concludes by stating that those who refuse the vaccine are being processed out.

In this video, the speaker discusses a confidential agreement between Moderna and the US government, spanning 153 pages. The agreement dates back to 2015, the same time when a paper on the Frankenstein coronavirus was published by Doctors Barrick and Shee. The NIH and Moderna collaborated with Doctor Barrick, as shown on page 106 of the agreement. The NIH appears to be transferring mRNA technology to Doctor Barrick, while also jointly owning the mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates developed with Moderna. The speaker finds it surprising that the government co-owns the vaccine, and clarifies that this agreement is not related to any recent political events.

Speaker 0: I find information like this, you know, inserts for the vaccine. Paper's there, and there's nothing printed on it. I find that very interesting, disheartening, disgusting, and lots of other words, but then it gets better. It just keep wait. There's more. It just keeps happening. The CDC redacts every single word of a 148 page study on a myocarditis after COVID vaccination. So I asked research to print the study for me. 148 pages. The entire thing is redacted. What good does a study do if there's nothing there? Then I wanna know, wait, what might have been there that they needed to redact it? That's even scarier. Speaker 1: We're witnessing an active cover up of a colossal consumer product safety debacle that is is basically affecting the entire world. Mhmm. So in The United States, our CDC, National Institutes of Health, and the FDA are actively involved in a cover up. And the same is occurring in The UK with the MHRA, Europe with European medicine agencies, and Australia with the Therapeutic Goods Administration. Something is going on that's very big. Each one of these companies that puts out a product has an obligation to produce ninety days of safety monitoring after their product comes out. It's a regulatory dossier. If somebody has a problem with the new product and they call the company like Pfizer, Pfizer has to report, write down what happened, and they have to collate that in a report and produce it and make it publicly available. When it came to ninety days with Pfizer, the first vaccine that came out, remember Pfizer was approved 12/10/2020. Pfizer didn't produce the report. And then people started asking, well, what's happening with your vaccine? And Pfizer would not disclose what happened. And then it went to court. And the lawyer for the FDA stepped in and said they don't wanna release Pfizer's dossier for fifty five years. Mhmm. Oh. Fifty five years. And the the the plaintiff pushed. And finally, slowly, the Pfizer dossier came out. Pfizer recorded one thousand two hundred and twenty three deaths with their product within ninety days of release. People were calling Pfizer in desperation watching their family members die after taking the vaccine. Pfizer recorded over twelve hundred new adverse events, new problems that doctor Boden has talked to you about that we are grappling with the entire time. But the point is our FDA worked to cover this up. The FDA should be regulating this company. FDA should have been having at least monthly meetings and fully disclosing what was going on with these novel vaccines, which are a genetic transfer technology platform.

The speaker discusses the layers of liability protection surrounding COVID-19 vaccines and questions why they are necessary if the vaccines are safe and effective. They mention a case against EcoHealth Alliance for allegedly creating the virus in a Wuhan lab with the help of the DOD and CIA. The speaker presents evidence, including military medical records, suggesting that COVID-19 may have been developed years before its official timeline. They also mention Pfizer documents discussing shedding and a study protocol related to gene therapy. The speaker emphasizes the need for further investigation into the involvement of the DOD and CIA and presents their evidence without drawing conclusions.

I was asked how many COVID vaccines I have, with no option to skip. I put 5 to waste their time like they waste mine. Employers shouldn't ask for medical history for jobs. I called EI about being declined work due to vaccination status. Employers requesting this should stop. Translation: I was asked how many COVID vaccines I have, with no option to skip. I put 5 to waste their time like they waste mine. Employers shouldn't ask for medical history for jobs. I called EI about being declined work due to vaccination status. Employers requesting this should stop.

"That will be my seventh COVID vaccine. I have gotten seven COVID vaccine." "Asked me if I got my RSV, and I honestly couldn't remember." "So I was trying to look it up in CVS, and I couldn't find it in CVS." "And so I had to go through my conversation history with Cat to find it." "But then CVS would load it, and I found that I got it on Valentine's Day." "This would make if if an anti vaxxer saw the list that I'm looking at right now of vaccinations, I have COVID flu, RSV flu, HIV, Polio, Tdap, MMR, Shingles, Hepatitis A, Flu." "That's great." "Oh, Polio. That's so many." "HPV." "Yeah." "So many. They would just freak out. They would just freak out."

Four days after ordering a deadly injection, Dr. Picchu allegedly ordered the removal of the COVID-19 vaccination record from the patient's medical file. The speaker claims any doctor would know not to vaccinate an ill patient, especially one recently off a ventilator. The head of the ICU ordered an mRNA injection for COVID-19 for a patient less than a week removed from a mechanical ventilator. The patient died later that week. The speaker states that Dr. Picho, head of the ICU in British Columbia, still has his medical license.

A year ago, the speaker requested data from Emma, including clinical trials from medical companies before they sought marketing authorization for their products. Regarding Pfizer, the speaker notes that the company submitted a clinical trial that started on January 14, 2020. The speaker questioned a Pfizer representative about how Pfizer started testing a vaccine in January 2020, just days after the Chinese government released DNA data about the virus in December 2019, but the representative declined to answer. The speaker also mentions that Moderna submitted trials dating back to 2017. The speaker asked the CEO of Moderna how it was possible to submit vaccine tests years before the virus was discovered in December 2019. The speaker states that these are legitimate questions that people are asking, but unfortunately, the companies are declining to answer.

The speaker discusses the layers of liability protection surrounding COVID-19 vaccines and questions why they are necessary if the vaccines are safe and effective. They mention a case against EcoHealth Alliance for allegedly creating the virus in a Wuhan lab with the help of the DOD and CIA. The speaker presents evidence, including military medical records, suggesting that COVID-19 may have been developed years before its official timeline. They also mention Pfizer documents discussing shedding and a study protocol related to gene therapy. The speaker emphasizes the need for further investigation into the involvement of the DOD and CIA in the creation of COVID-19.

The speaker discusses the potential dangers of vaccines, claiming that they can cause vaccine-induced AIDS and change the shape of red blood cells. They also mention a significant increase in morbidity and mortality in 2021, with manipulated numbers making it difficult to track the impact. The conversation then shifts to the military testing members for AIDS and whether they can determine if someone actually received the vaccine. The speaker explains that mass spectrometry revealed the presence of luciferase in Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, which can be used to verify vaccination status. They mention instances of people being turned away at the border due to fake vaccine cards. The speaker concludes by stating that those who refuse the vaccine are being processed out.

Lee Dennis, a human rights attorney, is working with Tom Rentz on a whistleblower issue in the military. They highlight a concerning trend regarding acute myocarditis cases in the Department of Defense (DOD). Initially, there were 1,239 cases, but now it has decreased to 307. Similarly, in January 2022, there were 176 cases, which has now dropped to 17. This drastic reduction raises suspicions. The military possesses a comprehensive dataset with baselines, showing that acute diseases in the years leading up to the COVID-19 vaccination were around 1.7 million. However, after the vaccine was mandated, the number skyrocketed to nearly 22 million in just 10 months. This significant increase suggests possible manipulation of the data, warranting further investigation and tough questions for the DOD.

In 2015, a 153-page confidential agreement between Moderna and the US government reveals collaboration with Dr. Barrick on mRNA coronavirus vaccines. The NIH co-owns the vaccine candidates with Moderna. This predates current events and raises questions about ulterior motives.

The speaker discusses the layers of liability protection surrounding COVID-19 vaccines and questions why they are necessary if the vaccines are safe and effective. They mention a case against EcoHealth Alliance for allegedly creating the virus in a Wuhan lab with the help of the DOD and CIA. The speaker presents evidence, including military medical records, suggesting that COVID-19 may have been developed years before its official timeline. They also mention Pfizer documents discussing shedding and a study protocol related to gene therapy. The speaker emphasizes the need for further investigation into the involvement of the DOD and CIA and presents their evidence for consideration.

Speaker 0 discusses the origin and framing of pandemic prevention and vaccine development as a military-led initiative. He cites a 2012 DARPA program called the Adept Protect p three program, described as a pandemic prevention platform. The proposal outlined the use of gene-encoded vaccines based on RNA or DNA with the goal of stopping a pandemic within sixty days. He suggests that, by the time President Trump referenced “Operation Warp Speed” to develop vaccines, there should have been preparation and acknowledgement that this work dated back to 2012, making it not rapid innovation but a decade-long effort. He argues that the public narrative of rapid development and stunning innovation surrounding vaccines is deceptive and that contractors like Moderna had already secured multi-million-dollar contracts in 2013. He notes that the military operates programs addressing biological threats and also works on answers such as monoclonal antibodies and vaccines. The claim is made that the military originated the idea of messenger RNA vaccines, not Pfizer or Moderna, and not in response to the outbreak from Wuhan. According to the speaker, this is a military program in origin and administration. The speaker asserts that Health and Human Services, under Alex Azar, together with the Department of Defense, ushered the public into a vaccine era, framing Emergency Use Authorization as a mechanism to rapidly deploy new technology into the military rather than the public. He contends that this mechanism’s broad public application began with the COVID-19 pandemic, which is presented as evidence that the FDA lacks ownership or control over the process because the program is characterized as military in origin and execution. The overall claim is that the program operates like a military operation with universal reach and without exemptions, implying a deeply embedded military approach to vaccine development and deployment. Throughout, the speaker emphasizes the continuity from a 2012 program proposal through to the public health landscape observed during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, asserting that the military’s involvement, timeline, and governance underlie the current vaccine paradigm and its regulatory pathways.