reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Most packaged meat in supermarkets is likely to be genetically modified unless it comes from a local farmer who feeds their animals non-GMO feed. The Cerrolini study in France found that the chemical paired with modified seeds, which are only available with a contract to buy Roundup, is toxic to human embryo cells. The president of Episit claimed to have developed corn that makes male sperm infertile, suggesting it as a solution to overpopulation. Some individuals aim to reduce the human population, viewing people as a cancer. Unfortunately, there are powerful individuals who are not mentally stable.

Speaker 0 discusses Bill Gates’ alleged involvement with Tyrana Biosciences, stating that Gates has donated $50,000,000 to a new company called Tyrana Biosciences, and that they are going to create a new category of biologically modified crops. One of Tyrana’s first targets is soybeans, according to the speaker. The speaker claims that the product will not be detectable as modified, nor labeled as GMO, because the EPA has said that it is, quote, “naturally occurring compounds and is not GMO.” The speaker explains the mechanism: it is taking RNA from a virus and using it to insert whatever gene they want into whatever crop they want. Once the RNA is inside the plant, it replicates, and it gives it different features. The company allegedly brags that they can create whatever feature they want. One of their targets is to make it more insect resistant, so the speaker says you’re going to put insecticides within the food. The speaker states that Tyrana is targeting tomatoes, corn, and soybeans first. The claim is that it will not be labeled as modified or GMO. The speaker asserts that Bill Gates is betting on making profit by genetically modifying our food without telling us. The speaker claims that the EPA has already given it the green light.

We are discussing regulation and the use of CRISPR to reduce mosquito populations and combat malaria. We are working with African countries on necessary trials. It will take time to get approvals, but the potential to eliminate disease locally is promising. Malaria is transmitted by mosquitoes, and we are demonstrating this by releasing some in the auditorium. Everyone should understand the impact, not just the poor.

We focus on smallholder farmers in Africa who typically farm on less than 2 hectares of land. Our goal is to establish a network of agro dealers to provide proper training on planting, fertilizing, and irrigation, as well as access to new pest-resistant, drought-resistant, and flood-resistant seeds. These advancements, known as GMOs, involve altering the plant's genes to enhance safety, reduce pesticide use, increase productivity, and address malnutrition through vitamin fortification. This technology will be crucial for Africa, especially in the face of climate change.

Vladimir Putin has passed a law in Russia that considers anyone who grows or sells genetically modified foods as a terrorist. He is encouraging Russians to grow organic, non-GMO food by giving away land. The speaker agrees with Putin's view that the West is over-vaccinated, overmedicated, and overfed with nutrient-deficient food. They mention that Monsanto's power prevents GMO labeling in Australia and the US. To ensure non-GMO food, buying organic is recommended, as organic farmers lose their status if they use genetically modified seeds. The speaker emphasizes that one organic tomato provides nine times the iron of a conventionally grown tomato. Genetically modified food involves splicing the DNA of different species, like a tomato with the DNA of a salmon, although it doesn't actually make the tomato grow in the snow.

Farmers have been saving and planting seeds for thousands of years, but the idea of corporations owning food crops is relatively new. In the 1980s, the Supreme Court allowed the patenting of life, leading to companies like Monsanto patenting valuable crops. Monsanto, a chemical company known for products like DDT and Agent Orange, developed Roundup and genetically engineered soybeans that could resist it. Farmers initially resisted the idea of not being able to save their own seeds, but over time, acceptance grew. Now, if a farmer saves seeds, Monsanto, the main company involved, may send investigators to look into the matter.

Monsanto found bacteria surviving Roundup in a waste dump, leading to Roundup-ready soybeans. Glyphosate in Roundup depletes nutrients in plants, weakens them, and promotes disease. Livestock eat Roundup-ready crops, leading to nutrient deficiency. FDA memos reveal GMO dangers in animal feed, with toxins bioaccumulating in animals and milk. 95% of genetic modifications aim to withstand more chemicals and drugs, altering genes in plants, animals, and humans permanently. Translation: Monsanto discovered bacteria resistant to Roundup in a waste dump, resulting in Roundup-ready soybeans. Glyphosate in Roundup depletes plant nutrients, weakens them, and promotes disease. Livestock consuming Roundup-ready crops face nutrient deficiencies. FDA memos expose GMO risks in animal feed, with toxins accumulating in animals and milk. 95% of genetic modifications aim to withstand more chemicals and drugs, altering genes in plants, animals, and humans permanently.

Checklist for summary approach: - Identify and preserve the core claims about GMO technology, safety concerns, and corporate motives as presented. - Highlight explicit examples and mechanisms (insertion of genes, Bt toxin, built-in pesticides, herbicide tolerance, seed patents). - Note the portrayed regulatory and legal dynamics (lobbying, revolving door, labeling, litigation, seed saving restrictions). - Emphasize unique or provocative elements (codfish gene for frost resistance, Indian BT cotton suicides link, cross-pollination as “not our problem”). - Exclude repetitive or filler content; avoid adding new judgments or opinions. - Translate or retain English phrasing of key statements exactly as needed. - Keep the summary within 388–486 words. Genetically modified organisms (GMO) are presented as a comprehensive, almost omnipotent solution to modern nutrition and farming, combining inserted insect and fish genes, irradiation, and pesticides embedded in crops. The narrative asserts: “Our GM scientists are putting the pesticide right inside the crops,” so the food itself will “kill those pesky critters stone cold dead.” It claims Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxin, produced by the inserted gene, destroys insects’ stomachs but not humans, adding, “We have absolutely no testing results to prove that these are safe, but they are. Trust us.” It argues that pesticides in crops enable plants to withstand more weed killer than organic crops, promising “No weeds, no bugs. More food, more profit.” The transcript lists staple crops: corn, rice, soybeans, cotton, alfalfa, papaya, oilseed rape, and adds that “GM is the gift that keeps on giving,” with ambitions including frost-resistant traits such as codfish genes in strawberries for the icy North Atlantic environment: “insert a gene from a codfish… Result, frost resistant strawberries.” It frames the looming challenge of population growth and food security as justification for rapid GMO adoption. Testing anecdotes are cited: “tests on rats eating genetically modified potatoes showed them growing slower after two or three generations and developing fertility problems, some organ development issues.” The speakers disparage critics as “goody two shoes scientists” and “whiny campaigners,” insisting they will wait to see human effects while biotech profits fund further GMO experiments. A central strategy is to persuade farmers to abandon organic farming in favor of GM, accompanied by aggressive seed patenting: “Whenever we change the natural gene sequence of any plant, we get a patent ASAP. It’s our invention after all. … total control of the seed.” Seed saving would be prohibited: “If you save seeds for next year’s crop, we’ll know. We’ll tie up farmers for years in the courts.” Farmers must buy new seeds and pesticides yearly; cross-pollination is dismissed as not their problem, and “your crops belong to us” once genes migrate. Regulatory capture and lobbying are described as routine: a “revolving door” between industry and judges, former GM lawyers in regulation bodies, and efforts to keep GMO labeling off products. The piece notes India’s BT cotton saga, claiming “hundreds of thousands of farmers have been organically recycled to dodge debts that they owe us,” with debts supposedly dying with farmers under Indian law and Bt cotton’s yields and bollworm resistance threatening revenue, as the strategy envisions becoming the sole cotton-seed supplier. European concerns about GMO pig feet—sterilization and growth issues—are acknowledged, with plans to work around them. The closing pitch invites consumption: “Eat up your veggies… there’ll be plenty for everyone for the right price.”

The speaker explains that they never switched to Monsanto Soybeans because they were getting good yields with conventional soybeans. They mention that their neighbors all use GMO soybeans, which can affect their crops. Another speaker points out that when a crop is genetically modified, the company owns it, which is a new concept in agriculture. They compare Monsanto to Microsoft, saying that Monsanto aims to own the intellectual property behind most of the food in America. Public plant breeding is now rare, and there are only a few varieties of soybeans available. The speaker expresses concern about not being able to buy certified seed and mentions a blacklist of unauthorized growers. They are on the list because they refused to turn over their records. The speaker concludes by discussing the limitations they face in choosing what to plant.

Speaker 0 explains that in the agriculture appropriations bill, they tried to defund research for transgenic edible plant vaccines. They describe the concept as scary and state that taxpayer dollars are funding research on vaccines produced in lettuce and spinach, such that when people eat those leafy greens, they would be vaccinated with whatever vaccine the plant is producing. The speaker asserts that there is a belief this approach amounts to “playing God with our spinach,” and argues that if someone wants to pursue this, tighter rules are probably necessary because pollen can escape and pollute plants in neighboring farms that did not intend to grow vaccines in their food. The speaker notes that they attempted to put rules on this issue in the agriculture appropriations bill and were able to stop taxpayer spending in that bill. However, the speaker states that the bill was thrown in the trash and an omnibus was passed instead. As a result, the speaker warns that there will be “another year of transgenic edible plant vaccine research,” and indicates that this topic will be a post of its own. In summary, the speaker highlights the following points: the existence of research funded with taxpayer dollars into transgenic edible plant vaccines produced in vegetables like lettuce and spinach; the concern about potential vaccination through consumption of these plants; the risk posed by pollen dispersion to neighboring farms; an effort to restrict funding via the agriculture appropriations bill that was ultimately unsuccessful due to the bill being discarded in favor of an omnibus; and the expectation that such research will continue for another year. The overall message emphasizes opposition to funding this line of research and points to procedural outcomes that hindered the attempted defunding, while noting that the broader effort and its controversy would be revisited in a future post.

Chuck Benbrook states that American farmers are as reliant on pesticides as they were 30-40 years ago. Pesticides seem like a simple solution for farmers dealing with weeds, insects, or plant diseases and have created a profitable industry. Farmers have become overly reliant on them, and the adverse effects of pesticides on the pests themselves has become a huge problem.

Monsanto scientists discovered bacteria at a chemical waste dump that could survive Roundup herbicide. They took the gene from the bacteria and inserted it into soybeans, creating Roundup Ready soybeans. These soybeans can be sprayed with Roundup without dying, but it kills other plant biodiversity. Roundup's active ingredient, glyphosate, was patented as a chelator that deprives plants of essential minerals and harms beneficial microorganisms in the soil. Livestock in the US consume Roundup Ready crops, leading to nutrient-deficient food. The toxins in genetically modified feed can accumulate in animals and their milk, posing a risk to human health. The majority of Canadian and American crops are genetically modified or contaminated. Genetic modifications are primarily done to make plants resistant to chemicals and animals resistant to drugs, but consuming them can alter our genes permanently.

Vladimir Putin has passed a law in Russia considering anyone who grows or sells genetically modified foods as a terrorist. He is encouraging Russians to grow organic, non-GMO food by giving away land. The speaker agrees with Putin's view that the West is over-vaccinated, overmedicated, and overfed with nutrient-deficient food. They mention that Monsanto's power prevents GMO labeling in Australia and the US. To ensure non-GMO food, the speaker suggests buying organic and growing your own. Organic tomatoes are said to have nine times the iron of conventionally grown ones. Genetically modified food involves splicing the DNA of different species, but it can have unknown effects on the body.

Bill Gates has donated $50,000,000 to Tyrana Biosciences, creating a category of biologically modified crops. One of their targets is soybeans, but you won't know you're buying a modified soybean because our EPA has said it is, quote, naturally occurring compounds and is not GMO. They're using RNA from a virus to insert whatever gene they want into whatever crop they want. Once the RNA is inside the plant, it replicates and gives features, and the company brags they can create whatever feature they want. One of their targets is to make it more insect resistant. So you're gonna put insecticides within the food. They're targeting tomatoes, corn, and soybeans. It will not be labeled as modified, and it will not be labeled as GMO. But Bill Gates is betting on making profit by genetically modifying our food without telling us. Our EPA has already given it the green light.

A speaker discusses genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and the debate surrounding their safety, mentioning a petition signed by 17 Nobel laureates asserting their safety. The speaker says that while millions have consumed GMOs without apparent harm, the context is important. The speaker explains that GMOs are often engineered to resist glyphosate, and glyphosate is used heavily. Glyphosate is described as an antibiotic, patented for antibiotic use, that kills microbiota around plants. The speaker claims that glyphosate is the most prescribed antibiotic on Earth, especially in rice farming, and that the consequences of its widespread use are unknown.

Spend all this money so that your apple wouldn't brown when sliced. So this non browning apple and non browning potato uses something called double stranded RNA. A little piece of RNA is created in these crops that silence the gene that normally causes the browning. Now, many scientists all over the world are concerned that that little snippet that we eat might reprogram or silence our DNA. Over a period of the next few weeks, over 1,400 genes change levels of expression compared to those that didn't have that meal. So that's 10% of the genome. We also know that certain mice can change their gene expression when they are eating double stranded RNA. And in spite of those peer reviewed published studies, the USDA allowed it on the market.

We need to provide better tools to poor farmers to combat climate change. I became aware of this issue while visiting Africa and witnessing the devastating effects of temperature increase on crops, leading to malnutrition and increased deaths. By utilizing gene sequencing, AI, and satellite data, we can enhance the productivity and resilience of all crops, not just mainstream ones. This will greatly improve the lives of over 500 million farmers. Scaling up these improvements is crucial, and prioritizing high-impact interventions, similar to how we prioritize health interventions, is essential. Today marks a significant milestone in accelerating innovation for climate adaptation.

GMOs, or genetically modified organisms, were once believed to be a solution for world hunger, promising benefits like drought resistance, higher yields, improved nutrition, and reduced pesticide use. However, the reality is quite different. The majority of GMOs on the market today serve two purposes: producing insecticides within the plant itself and being resistant to herbicides. This means that bugs that consume these plants die, and the plants can be sprayed with toxic herbicides without being harmed. Consequently, we are now consuming plants that act as pesticide factories and have been exposed to herbicides.

Most packaged meat in supermarkets is likely to be genetically modified unless it comes from a local farmer who feeds their animals non-GMO feed. The Cerrolini study in France found that the chemical paired with modified seeds, which are only available with a contract to buy Roundup, is toxic to human embryo cells. The president of Episit claimed to have developed corn that makes male sperm infertile, suggesting it as a solution to overpopulation. Some individuals aim to reduce the human population, viewing people as a cancer. Unfortunately, there are powerful individuals who are not mentally stable.

Monsanto scientists discovered bacteria at a chemical waste dump that could survive Roundup herbicide. They inserted the gene responsible for this into soybeans, creating Roundup ready crops. However, Roundup kills plant biodiversity and hinders access to essential minerals, weakening plants and promoting disease. Livestock in the US consume Roundup ready crops, leading to nutrient-deficient food. The director of the Centre For Veterinary Medicine warned that toxins in genetically modified feed could accumulate in animals and their milk. Currently, 90% of Canadian and American crops are genetically modified or contaminated. Genetic modifications primarily aim to make plants resistant to chemicals and animals resistant to drugs, but consuming them can alter our genes permanently.

Vladimir Putin passed a law that any Russian who grows or sells GMO foods is considered a terrorist. Putin is giving land to Russians who will grow food organically, stating that Russians see the West as over-vaccinated, overmedicated, overfed, and weakened by nutrient-lacking food. Monsanto is powerful enough to win court cases against GMO labeling. Buying organic is the only way to avoid GMOs, as organic farmers lose their status if they use genetically modified seeds. An organic tomato has 9 times the iron of a conventionally grown one. GMOs involve splicing DNA of different species, like a tomato and Atlantic salmon, to create new traits. Eating genetically modified food can damage your DNA because the body cannot recognize the molecules.

The discussion centers on pets being used as self-amplifying mRNA vectors. The USDA quietly approved Merck's self-amplifying RNA shots called Novavac NXT for cats and dogs with no real safety testing. It says it gives a small dose of RNA particles delivered in the Novavac NXT vaccine. RNA copies exponentially in the cells, and the copies are transcripted into large amounts of the desired antigen. The antigen stimulates a more robust humular and cellular immune response. All sounds good in theory. However, these injections may shed messenger RNA and synthetic antigens to human owners through breath, saliva, or fluids may cause long term genetic damage similar to that seen in humans may recombine with wild viruses creating dangerous new pathogens. This rollout puts both pets and their owners into an uncontrolled genetic experiment without consent. “So says Nicholas Holcher, Miles per hour. So masters in public health. We don't know. Nobody tested it. Nobody did any studies. We don't have long term studies. We don't have short term studies. We just don't know. I'm a little scared. I really don't want to be a part of this.” And by the way, they're actually talking about spraying messenger RNA on our crops. How are we affecting our I feel like this is the everybody remember the book Brave New World by Aldous Huxley. I think I had to read it in high school. Was one of those required readings. Or what was the other book? 1984? Like, I feel like we're living in this dystopian universe where we just experiment with all these genetic things and we just throw it into the environment and throw it into our pets and throw it into people, and we don't know what the outcome is until we see. Are we all gonna go the way the dinosaurs? I don't know. Now I really sound like a conspiracy theorist. Are we all gonna like, is somebody gonna come along in a few thousand years and find fossil remains and try to figure out why we all died? I don't know. It's fine. It's fine. It's just a little nervous.” One speaker says they homestead: they raise their own chickens. They’re not treated with chemicals. Their dogs and cats don't get vaccinated with things that might shed into the environment, and they’re growing all their own organic fruits and vegetables. “Yep, I'm I'm I'm going that way. Y'all y'all do what you need to do. It's a little scary. I don't recommend that particular vaccine for your dogs. I I guess that's the bottom line. I don't know. Be careful what you eat.”

Four companies today control the seed system. They do not want farmers to have their own seeds. They treat farmers having their own seeds as violating their monopoly rights. The monopoly rights are created through patenting and intellectual property. Intellectual property rights means I have created something. I'm an inventor. But seed is not a machine. It is not put together. Seed is evolution forever. Seed is renewable. Seed is multiplicative. One seed can give me a thousand seeds. In the case of millets, a 100,000 seeds. When seeds are made nonrenewable and seeds are designed for use of chemicals, what happens is biodiversity starts to disappear.