reSee.it - Related Video Feed

"They want to enslave your child, your wife, your mother." "There isn't anything that you ever had." "There isn't anything that you own." "There isn't any right that you possess that they're not planning on taking away." "A new world order." "The United States Of America is controlled by this evil ark." "They control the money system. They control the state department. They control the presidency." "No cash. Cashless society. It's ready to go." "Disease could be created." "We have new strains of virtually everything that's drug resistant or drug I'm" "Future shocker biochip." "That's an injectable computer chip, an economic mark in the back of our right hands or in our foreheads." "You've got a choice. You can join in this fight or you can die as a slave."

"I'm done talking about COVID, and I'm done talking about SARS CoV two." "For a hundred and ten years, we, the people of the world, have been lied to." "We're a group of very small number of criminal industrial conspirators decided to subordinate the entirety of the human population for the purpose of their sinister plans to enrich themselves while impoverishing and killing the rest of humanity." "When the words acceptable death rate become part of an industrial norm, we have lost the plot of humanity." "This is a criminal cartel." "since its formation in the nineteen forties, the World Health Organization has been nothing more than a criminal cartel that has a sole and singular intent." "This is not an allegation." "This is actually provable by their own words in their own hand." "And they use a four step process to execute every one of their nefarious plans."

In the near future, there will be mandatory vaccination, potentially causing a flu pandemic. If there are widespread deaths from these vaccinations, there may be a rebellion against vaccines.

In 1993, the World Economic Forum’s Global Leaders program, specifically the Young Global Leaders, began, with Bill Gates among the first into the camp. The speaker notes that about 4,000 individuals have progressed into senior positions since 1993, implying a broad pipeline of influence over time. The argument presented is that this setup helps explain why events around 2020 unfolded in a coordinated way. In 2005, the World Economic Forum hosted a large gathering of these Young Global Leaders for the so-called 2020 initiative. They brought them together and had them brainstorm what they would do, informing them of what they should do. The claim is that when 2020 arrived and a big pandemic emerged, these leaders were already positioned and had already discussed how to respond to misinformation and lockdowns, implying a premeditated or preplanned approach. The speaker characterizes this as “Pavlov’s dogs,” suggesting predictability and rehearsed responses. The speaker then references the Global Risk Report from 2006, produced by the Rand Corporation in collaboration with the military–industrial complex and the World Economic Forum. The report allegedly identified pandemics as the big risk for the world around 2020, even noting this risk “for zero reason whatsoever.” It is asserted that the report also identified misinformation as a major problem, predicting that ordinary people might start talking and spreading fear, which would hinder whatever outcomes were anticipated. The speaker asserts that those involved were aware that ordinary public discourse could decrease fear and undermine the “scam,” hence their stated need to stop the spread of fear by censoring information. This is presented as the rationale behind censorship measures described in the 2006 context. Key points emphasized: - The 1993–present pipeline of Young Global Leaders through the World Economic Forum, including Bill Gates, with roughly 4,000 reaching senior positions since 1993. - The 2005 2020 initiative to brainstorm and direct actions for 2020, implying foreknowledge of potential misinformation and pandemics. - The 2006 Rand Corporation Global Risk Report, in collaboration with the military–industrial complex and WEF, identifying pandemics as a major risk and misinformation as a key problem, and arguing for censorship to prevent public discussion from inflaming fear.

Speaker 0 accuses Bill Gates of releasing billions of genetically modified mosquitoes and says Gates talked about using mosquitoes to deliver an mRNA vaccine so people wouldn’t know what was happening. The speaker asserts that the EPA approved this, and claims the mosquitoes are genetically modified to get rid of malaria. The speaker questions Gates’ motives, asserting that Gates has never done anything to help humanity or the 13 families, and insisting Gates cares about pushing vaccines to control the population, including “by pushing a button and billions of people just drop where they’re standing,” and by controlling the rest of the population. The speaker says the issue isn’t avoiding shots, but that vaccines are being put into everything people are exposed to—food, water, air—and now into mosquitoes so they can inject people. The speaker claims that everyone on the planet currently has the mRNA spike protein in them and urges detoxing from it and following a detox protocol until the 13 families and their puppets are removed from power. The speaker encourages watching a video about Gates and the mosquitoes. Speaker 1 reframes the issue by saying Bill Gates is turning the world into a banquet for genetically engineered mosquitoes, and that this is being done with EPA approval. The claim is that the people were not consulted, and some are unhappy about it. The executive director of the Florida Keys Environmental Coalition is quoted as saying the EPA forgot its middle name, Protection, and that the EPA has not shown any investigation proving that this experimental insect won’t create infinitely more problems than it will solve. Speaker 2 adds that no independent scientists have corroborated anything claimed by the vendor, and describes the mosquitoes as genetically engineered, blood-sucking insects carrying deadly diseases being released into neighborhoods. Speaker 0 reiterates that this is “crazy stuff” but true, noting Gates talked about it in speeches two years ago and that it was launched into the population, with Florida being bombarded.

Throughout history, there have been oligarchies, and currently, in 2002, there is an organization called the new world order. They aim to establish a global government, a cashless society, and open borders, leading to complete tyranny. They also seek to centralize and socialize healthcare, making the state the ultimate authority in our well-being. Furthermore, they release diseases and viruses to manipulate and control us.

Predicting the future is a risky task. If a prediction seems reasonable, it will likely be considered conservative in 20 or 50 years due to scientific and technological progress. Conversely, if a prophet accurately describes the future, it would sound absurd and be ridiculed. This has been true in the past and will likely continue in the future. The only certainty about the future is that it will be incredibly amazing. If my words sound reasonable, I have failed. Only if what I say seems unbelievable can you have a chance of envisioning the true future.

There will likely be a deadly airborne disease in the future, so we need to establish a global infrastructure to quickly detect, isolate, and respond to it. This was emphasized by multiple speakers. A document from 2010 predicted a pandemic similar to what we are experiencing now, with China being better prepared and implementing strict measures. The document also foresaw increased government control and oversight, which has become a reality. A simulation called Event 201, held in October 2019, accurately predicted the coronavirus outbreak. The speakers discussed the importance of managing misinformation and disinformation. They believe that controlling access to information is necessary to combat the pandemic. Some speakers expressed skepticism about the coincidences and the level of control being exerted.

There is a consensus that appears in the World Health Organization’s ten-year plan, which has been in place for a long time. The plan states that people should prepare for the coming ten years because a major infectious crisis is anticipated. In other words, the plan foretells that over the next decade there will be a significant infectious-health emergency. The speaker notes that “this was year 1,” indicating that the current year is the first year of that ten-year horizon outlined by the plan.

In 2015, Obama, Fauci, Gates, and Pelosi met with the bat lady in Wuhan to discuss research. In 2017, Fauci predicted a coronavirus outbreak. Fauci and Bright discussed vaccine development in 2019. Daszick mentioned dangerous coronaviruses in China. They fear a pandemic from these viruses. They are working on vaccines but face challenges. This could lead to a global reset.

In 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation published a document predicting a pandemic like COVID-19. It described a scenario where governments imposed strict measures, citizens gave up privacy for safety, and misinformation spread. Event 201, a simulation hosted in 2019, eerily mirrored the pandemic. Experts warned of a highly infectious virus causing global catastrophe. The current situation is seen as a result of long-term planning.

In 1997, a document predicted several future events. These include fast-mutating viral disease pandemics and genetically developed vaccines. Also predicted were smart IDs and DNA database tracking, along with DNA chips. Gene-based pharmaceuticals and transmitting genetic instructions for a disease process were mentioned. The document also predicted artificial intelligence to determine gene patterns and robots for genome sequencing. It discussed using recombinant DNA for making spike proteins. Smart homes and smart cities were included, along with a prediction that people would be working from home virtually by 2020. Other predictions were World War Three, nuclear devices causing widespread contamination, nanotech devices, and digital currency. Finally, it mentioned vaccination programs run by organizations like the World Health Organization for a global killer that has yet to emerge.

The speaker attributes their ability to spot trends to early exposure to digital technology, including programming at a young age. This familiarity allowed them to anticipate the impact of the digital revolution, as discussed in their book "The Road Ahead," which covered the Internet, digital money, and video conferencing. Their move into foundation work exposed them to the global health community's understanding of pandemic risks. They claim that the risk of a pandemic killing millions was commonplace knowledge within that small community. They state they were listened to regarding this risk, but unfortunately, most people only heeded the warning after the pandemic occurred, rather than taking preventative action beforehand.

The speaker discusses the possibility of a cyber pandemic and references the World Economic Forum's prediction about it. They mention the Forum's previous accurate prediction of the coronavirus pandemic and suggest that it may be worth paying attention to their future predictions. The speaker explains that the cyber pandemic would involve a bug sweeping through the Internet, similar to a computer virus, and the potential need to shut down the Internet and power grid to prevent its spread.

Here's what's coming: Banks will announce a security action on a Friday, forcing their computers offline all weekend, and digital money will vanish. Following that, strategic electromagnetic pulse bombs will detonate, knocking out major grids. This will appear as an attack on America by terrorists or Russia, or even a simulated alien invasion using existing alien replica vehicles. I know it sounds crazy, but the Russians tried this in '47. Some people think saying these things is fear mongering and irresponsible, techno paranoia, bogus, dangerous, and stupid. But I believe it's irresponsible not to say it, especially if it's the truth.

Speaker 0: Have you seen local news anchors reciting it verbatim, as if democracy is the greatest thing ever? It’s become a social engineering propaganda tool that democracy is the greatest thing ever. We weren’t founded as a democracy. This country is founded as a constitutional republic. Speaker 1: There’s a line from Sweatshop Union: if democracy is so good, why are we running all over the world down people’s throats? Speaker 0: Exactly. Spreading democracy by dropping bombs just doesn’t make sense. Speaker 2: The political apparatus is set up such that government is not merit-based, but private institutions select leaders on merit. What happens if, in the future, micro sovereignties are run by the most competent person rather than a personality? Look at Lee Kuan Yew in Singapore in the 80s. His government was compensated based on economic returns and performance. Singapore is widely regarded as one of the best places to do business and as one of the freest, most open micronations. Speaker 0: Let’s start with The Sovereign Individual, the book on the table. Difficult read? Speaker 2: One of the hardest reads, in my view. It’s dry and painful, with dismal subjects. Speaker 0: An eye opener—unplugging from the matrix. It’s an orange-peeling book and was written in 1997, about twenty years before Bitcoin. Speaker 2: It predicted the emergence of anonymous digital cash, i.e., Bitcoin. It predicted the rise of narrowcasting rather than broadcasting, i.e., social media. It predicted government use of a plandemic to reinforce border integrity when things started to get weird. Speaker 0: It was prescient. Imagine reading it in 1996. The book’s first five to ten years—how successful was it? Speaker 1: I imagine they’ve sold enormous numbers more recently. The book’s sales figures suggest a Pareto effect: 10-to-1, 15-to-1 in rankings. The necessity of a post-nine world has made the authors’ insights profoundly prophetic. Speaker 2: It’s a book ahead of its time. How would you pitch it to someone who hasn’t read it? Speaker 0: The easiest pitch is to tell them upfront that it’s impossible, font too, and that it’s dense. In a short-time-preference society, reading long-form is niche. The value is unplugging from the matrix; if you have the courage to unplug, this book will ruin your life in the best possible way. It’s the one-way door toward Bitcoin. Speaker 1: Would you suggest that someone with a strong Bitcoin understanding read the book? Speaker 2: Yes. The audio is easier for some; the density is akin to a Peterson-level experience. A few have read it and shared the same unplugging moment. The book’s central idea is that after a certain realization, you cross an event horizon toward a brighter future, where finances and sovereignty are rethought. Speaker 0: The book’s numbers show how compounding matters: if you’re paying tax or inflation on savings, opting out into self-sovereign regimes like Bitcoin or jurisdictional optimization can be transformative. The example: for every $5,000 in taxable income, a 10% compounded yield over a forty-year career costs you more than $2.2 million. The answer, as the book highlights, is to move to Bermuda or switch to Bitcoin, eliminating inflation’s tax on your purchasing power. Speaker 2: The analogy: a 100-dollar bill on the ground—someone will eventually pick it up. The book frames incentives as simple, primordial drivers: people seek the easiest path to preserving wealth, and Bitcoin creates a powerful magnetism toward sovereignty. Speaker 0: The discussion then moves to a digital future: the sovereign individual, information aristocrats, and the rise of digital nomad visas. In 2020, 21 countries offered digital nomad visas; by 2025, between 43 and 75 countries are inviting people to live there for up to eighteen months, bringing income and economic value. This reflects the shift toward the “digital heaven” where physical location is less limiting, aided by crypto finance, multisig, and portable wealth. Speaker 2: The concept of “digital Berlin Walls” and border controls is challenged by the rise of nomad visas, tax competition, and capital mobility. As the state’s revenue base weakens, micro states or micro nations question how to finance themselves; land can be sold or leased to new sovereign enclaves, while existing nation-states become more like a la carte governments. Speaker 0: The discussion then turns to Moore’s Law and bandwidth, and how faster processing and information flow empower sovereign individuals. As information becomes easier to transport, people can conduct business from Bermuda, Japan, or Florida with equal ease. That power accelerates the move toward self-sovereignty. Speaker 1: The rise of cyber warfare is a counterpoint: a single actor can strike on a scale once reserved for nation-states. This creates a need to treat citizens as customers to encourage them to stay, while individuals can also defend themselves with cryptography, multisig, and secure digital infrastructure. The book’s framework contrasts magnitude of power with efficiency: the transition from medieval power projection to high-technology, efficient defense and commerce. Speaker 2: The Luddites are discussed as a historical example: when a new machine threatened skilled labor, some resisted, but the Luddites did not riot against all technology—only against those jobs at risk. The modern parallel is AI and data-entry work: will the losers and left-behinds revolt against technology, or will they adapt? The answer may lie in new governance forms where governance is more responsive to the needs of citizens who are themselves mobile and empowered. Speaker 0: The conversation returns to “government as a service” versus the nation-state. Open-market competition among micro-nations could yield better service ethics, as governments compete to deliver what citizens want, when they want it. The book emphasizes that the market should decide governance efficiency, not centralized coercion. The nation-state’s cost of enforcement rises as sovereignty disperses, making it harder to extract taxes or project power. Speaker 1: The panel discusses the role of education and personal responsibility. Reading the Sovereign Individual remains a duty, but so does practical action: multisig setup, hardware wallets, off-ramps, and building digital sovereignty with practical steps. The speakers stress the importance of small, incremental steps: five minutes a day of reading; gradual exposure; and helping others gain exposure to Bitcoin through accessible tools. Speaker 2: The “orange pill moment” is repeated: once you see the future, you cannot unsee it. The book is a catalyst for readers to pursue self-sovereignty, not as a cynical rejection of government, but as a practical shift toward a voluntary, customer-based governance model in a world of mobile populations and robust tech. The speakers emphasize that this is not a call for doom; it’s an invitation to participate in reform through education, prudent financial choices, and deliberate, long-term planning. Speaker 0: The closing notes insist: read, educate others, and become the change you want to see. The conversation underscores three pillars: information technology’s accelerating power, the emergence of micro-nations and digital sovereignty, and the imperative to align incentives toward cooperative, merchant-like behavior rather than coercive domination. The speakers leave the audience with a hopeful vision: a world of decentralized governance where governments as “customers” compete to serve, and where sovereign individuals use Bitcoin to protect and grow wealth, enabling a future with less violence and more abundance. Speaker 1: If you want to connect with the speakers, you can follow them via their channels (noting their emphasis on privacy and selective presence). The discussion ends with renewed energy: fight for the future, protect your digital life, and explore the bright orange future responsibly, with education and preparedness as your guides.

In five years, there will be 415,000 low orbit satellites. Bill Gates claims his 65,000 satellites will monitor every square inch of the planet 24/7. The implementation of 5G is intended to harvest our data and control our behavior. Digital currency will enable remote punishment and food supply disruption. Vaccine passports are also forthcoming.

Predicting the future is a risky task. If a prediction seems reasonable, it will likely be considered conservative in 20 or 50 years due to scientific and technological progress. Conversely, if a prophet accurately describes the future, it would sound absurd and be ridiculed. This has been true in the past and will likely continue in the future. The only certainty about the future is that it will be amazing. If my words sound reasonable, I have failed. Only if what I say seems unbelievable can you truly imagine the future as it will be.

In 2018, the CEO of Pfizer spoke at the World Economic Forum about the potential of ingestible computer chips in tablet form. These chips would signal when a drug has been digested, allowing authorities and insurance companies to monitor medication compliance. The CEO acknowledged the initial cost and emphasized the benefits of this technology. Looking back now, considering the COVID-19 pandemic and associated mandates, his remarks may not seem far-fetched.

The speaker presents an abbreviated list of predictions they claim were foreseen 27 years ago, noting the list could have been longer but was kept brief. The items are: - Fast mutating viral disease pandemics. - Genetically developed vaccines. - DNA database tracking, DNA chips (1997). - Gene-based pharmaceuticals. - Transmitting genetic instructions for a disease process. - Determining gene patterns. - AI, and the assertion that “Twenty seven years ago, who had heard about AI? Apparently, they they had.” - Robots for doing genome sequencing. - Using recombinant DNA for making spike proteins (1997). - Smart homes and a chapter on smart homes slash smart cities. - A prediction that by 2020, not 2025, people would be working from home virtually. - Nuclear devices causing widespread contamination. - Nanotech devices. - Digital currency. - Vaccination programs run by organizations like the World Health Organization for a global killer that has yet to emerge. The speaker characterizes these as predictions printed in the first edition in February 1997.

- "When you ignore things that are legally entered into Pentagon directives, college textbooks, and other legal documents that are required by universities for PhDs, that's gonna catch up to you." - "that's how we end up with an intelligent cluster based routing protocol and going through the human body." - "And people are out there right now telling you none of this is real." - "the blockchain Bitcoin is not here yet." - "So that means that Bitcoin, three d printing nanotechnology is not in use." - "for any of you right now that have a Bitcoin wallet, you're having a mass hallucination." - "We've had biosensors since the nineteen fifties." - "So what we have had to endure for five years are psychological operations." - "They're killing people. It's called a kill box."

I accurately predicted the use of a virus by the Rockefeller Foundation to establish global governance and a worldwide medical identification system. They also mentioned the creation of a social credit score and the implementation of more mask usage out of fear. Additionally, I foresaw the shutdown of sporting events as part of this new form of control. I repeatedly made these predictions.

"Nanobots, smart dust, will infuse all matter around us with information." "these chemtrails, not contrails, chemtrails that come out the back of planes, they started appearing in the late nineteen nineties, now they're freaking everywhere." "Radiation in the atmosphere generated by technology has absolutely soared beyond words since I was a kid, and increases by the day." "cell towers are pouring out frequencies that disrupt human minds." "Exposure to cell phone and wireless WiFi radiation can reduce impulse control and cause violence." "AI is also meant to take people's jobs away on an absolutely vast scale." "One of the longer term goals of this agenda is to replace the biological human body with a synthetic version." "This is a psychological trick called preemptive programming." "We have allowed ourselves to build our own technological prison without realizing that's what it is." "the coming synthetic human."

The transcript discusses a narrative that connects Bill Gates, Jeffrey Epstein, and a global, pre-planned approach to pandemics, presenting a sequence of alleged events and structures designed to profit from health crises. It begins with a claim that new vaccines and health services could be improved and costs reduced by ten to fifteen percent over the next five to ten years, and that a future pandemic will occur regardless of current efforts. It is stated that the pandemic risk is two to three percent per year and that attention to preparedness will continue, noting that the pandemic was predictable and could be far more severe in the future. One speaker asserts they had predicted the risk of a pandemic and that it came true. The brand-new Epstein files are then introduced, claiming they show Epstein planned the whole thing from the start and expose a financial system designed around pandemics that operated long before COVID-19. The documents allegedly reveal a hidden network directly connecting Bill Gates, Jeffrey Epstein, and other powerful individuals. Epstein is said to have helped design the financial apparatus that later secured over 100 million dollars in funding for the Gates Foundation, advising JPMorgan executives on pitching a Gates Anchored Donor Fund to attract vaccine investments under the guise of philanthropy but designed to generate profits. It is claimed Gates had already invested in vaccines from the early 2000s but faced controversy over mass vaccine distribution and promises of disease eradication, which allegedly sometimes worsened problems. Gates is also quoted as saying vaccines could reduce the global population by a significant amount. There is a point-by-point timeline: the world’s population is described as 6.8 billion, headed toward about 9 billion, with a suggestion that great work on vaccines and reproductive health could lower that by ten to fifteen percent. In 2013, the Gates Foundation allegedly created the Global Health Investment Fund, allowing private investors to fund drug and vaccine development with a stated health purpose, while offering a 60% guarantee of principal, meaning investors would risk only 40% while the remaining 60% of potential losses would be covered by philanthropic and public money. This structure is said to convert global health issues into profitable opportunities with low risk, securing funds and enabling subsequent actions. Epstein’s role is described as expanding Gates’ influence in pandemic preparedness. The 2011 funding groundwork allegedly paved the way for broader governance, with Gates Foundation discussions in 2015 about pandemics and global responses, involving groups like the International Peace Institute, World Health Organization, World Bank, MSF, and UN officials. It is claimed Epstein acted as a back-channel intermediary to spread Gates’ influence, maintaining contacts even after funding refusals, by forwarding Gates’ articles on pandemic preparedness. The timeline continues with 2017 being a turning point, where pandemics were discussed as business opportunities rather than disasters, and Epstein was said to broker specialists into Gates’ office for pandemic simulations. A doctor’s text is cited indicating pandemic simulation as a key credential, with Epstein recommending a connection to Gates. That year also saw the World Bank launch the first emergency financing facility, raising $320 million in bonds named to cover coronavirus risks, implying planning for a coronavirus-style outbreak years in advance. In October 2019, six weeks before COVID-19, Event 201—a pandemic simulation modeled on a novel coronavirus—was co-hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, the World Economic Forum, and the Gates Foundation, focusing on government policy during a viral outbreak, distribution of drugs, media messaging, social media management, public compliance, and unified global response. Six weeks later, the real outbreak began. While the documents are not proof, and other evidence such as patents and gain-of-function funding are cited, the narrative suggests a pattern of pre-planned preparation, money, simulations, networks, vaccines, and elite alignment. The closing question asks readers to consider who benefits when such world-stage events occur, proposing that identifying beneficiaries clarifies the situation.

We are seeing significant job cuts, advanced artificial intelligence, mind-reading technology, population profiling, genetics with CRISPR technology, and gene editing. The movie Minority Report predicted some of these developments in the mid-nineties, showing impressive foresight.