reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker witnessed a woman and her kids being kicked off a flight, along with another woman who stood up for them. The speaker didn't intervene due to having foster kids with them. The airline offered compensation, but the speaker vowed never to fly with them again. The speaker experienced multiple delays and felt mistreated by the airline. After the women were removed, all seats were filled.

My son and I were denied boarding on a United Airlines flight from San Francisco to Austin because I allegedly made a derogatory comment about a flight attendant by using the wrong pronoun. They are now refusing to let us on the plane, despite us having boarding priority. I am with my 25-pound son, and we are unsure of what will happen next.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 are discussing discharge rights at a hospital. The core issue is that there is no doctor’s order allowing the baby to go home, while the mother believes she can leave without such an order. Key points: - The mother argues “the mommy can go without doctor’s order, but not the baby,” and asks why the baby cannot accompany the mom. - Speaker 1 insists “there’s nothing wrong with the baby” and asks to “get the doctor up here so we can be discharged.” - Speaker 0 repeats: “There is no order for the baby to go home.” Speaker 1 counters, “There doesn’t have to be one.” - They have been "going through this for, like, the last hour," and they want to leave. Speaker 1 asks, “How long is it gonna be before the doctor gets up here?” and they say “We are calling the doctor right now. It depends on how when you get a callback.” - A hospital staff member (Speaker 2) asks to speak outside with Speaker 1, saying, “Sir, can I talk to you outside real quick?” and then notes a need for discretion regarding victims. - The routine difficulty is clarified: “There is no doctor's order for the baby to go home.” Yet Speaker 1 states, “There’s not,” and they reiterate their desire to leave: “We wanna leave.” - They discuss the process: Speaker 0 says, “Yes. We are [calling],” and Speaker 1 says, “Get the order… so we can leave.” Speaker 1 adds, “And so we can leave.” - Regarding consequences or external involvement, Speaker 1 asks about CPS: “CPS? No. They didn't? No. Nothing about CPS. Nothing.” - The dialogue emphasizes that the mother believes she should be allowed to discharge, and the baby’s discharge requires a doctor’s order, which they are not obtaining at the moment. Overall, the conversation centers on the discrepancy between the mother’s belief that she can discharge without a doctor’s order and the hospital’s apparent requirement for a formal order for the baby to be discharged. They are actively attempting to contact the doctor to issue the necessary order, while expressing frustration at the delay. CPS is mentioned but not involved, with reassurance that there has been no CPS involvement. The mother asserts that the mother can leave, but the baby cannot without the doctor’s order, and Speaker 1 keeps pressing to obtain that order so they can discharge.

The speaker questions United Airlines CEO, Scott Kirby, about a video showing a United ticketing agent grabbing a passenger's dog and belongings. The speaker's wife and mother were calmly trying to leave the terminal after being told they couldn't fly. The agent wanted to take the dog out of the bag and report the wife. The speaker confronts United's VP of operations, who lies about the incident. The speaker demands a video and information about customer interaction regulations. United's video confirms the wife's version of events. The VP becomes aggressive and threatens the speaker. The speaker plans to fight for passenger rights and legislation to protect consumers from such incidents. They ask if it is United's policy to allow agents to grab passengers, pets, and property without consent.

This is unbelievable! My kids were asleep, and I'm pretty sure the flight was overbooked. They offered passengers $100 plus new tickets to take a later flight, but no one took it. Then, they kicked a woman and her kids off for simply asking about the delay. Another woman who defended her was also removed. I was terrified of being kicked off, especially since I couldn't afford another flight. I started recording because I thought it was outrageous that she was removed for asking a question. I felt pressured to stay quiet to avoid the same fate. They gave us $80 towards a future Frontier flight, but I'll never fly with them again. It was completely unacceptable.

I'm being detained and can't return to my house. What am I being detained for? What are the specific reasons? Why am I here? You're going to put handcuffs on me? No, do not touch me. Don't touch me.

We've been waiting three hours for answers. This is unacceptable. I need to speak to someone immediately. I can't continue waiting; my children are sleeping. My requests for answers have been ignored, making me feel uncomfortable. This situation is wrong and needs to be addressed. I'm not going anywhere until I get answers. I'm asking for someone to come and explain what's happening. We've all been waiting far too long, and it's impacting everyone. I need to resolve this now.

- His bag showed up. Mine didn't. I called American Airlines. “I don’t know where your bags are.” “Why are you going to El Salvador?” - Because I worked. I’m friendly with the government down there. I work in … I’ll just say I liaison from the interests of America are in El Salvador, and I help represent some of those interests. - And so, basically, I go down there. I have safe haven down there. I have a safe house. I have people. - I’m getting threats on my life. I get my family.

I was the last person to board the plane with my regular passport. I went through immigration and they held onto my passport illegally. I told my lawyers to retrieve it. While on the plane, an immigration officer approached me and said the president wanted me off the plane because they were going to arrest me. They returned my money and my mom arrived in a wheelchair. They still held onto my passports without any arrest warrant. I can't stay idle, so I waited for another half hour until they detained me. This is all part of the leftist politics that want to turn Honduras into Venezuela, Nicaragua, or Cuba.

The TSA were described as telling the speaker they “can’t take your honey on the airplane,” prompting the speaker to question what they would be hiding in honey. The speaker claimed they did not take down the alleged buildings using “hologram” or “holographic pla-planes,” and argued that “they sit there and turn every person into acting like they are the terrorist,” while “the government is.” The speaker then urged travelers to “opt out” of airport security screening processes—such as X-ray and the photo—stating that people can opt out and then request a pat down. They claimed that if enough people request pat downs, airports would not be able to continue scanning everyone. The speaker also said that if people opt out and request pat downs, they should highlight concerns about being X-rayed, scanned, and having their bodily organs involved, and about being unable to bring water while being offered food like McDonald’s and Starbucks. The speaker advised taking away items by claiming “medical grade” or “medical purposes,” and stated that TSA workers would be more likely to allow them through if they believe the passenger needs the item to avoid dying on the airplane. The speaker described the situation as authorities removing rights, and urged “grow a pair,” “wake up,” and “take back your rights.” They further stated that the same approach should apply to taking foods and other items, and suggested that authorities would accommodate those claims. The speaker then shifted to claims about the World Trade Center: they mentioned “symmetrical damage” on each face of the buildings and said it was “completely corroborating the firefighters,” describing a “belt all the way around the building.” They claimed that video shows “a series of a dozen independent explosions going off floor by floor,” including an isolated explosive “on ten floors below or so,” and said there were devices patented before September 11 that used thermite as a “shape cutter.” They also claimed that “fireproofing upgrades” occurred in the months and years before September 11, “oh, coincidentally,” at the same point where the planes hit, and questioned how coincidental that could be.

You stole fizzy lifting drinks, bumped into the ceiling, and now get nothing. Good day, sir.

The speaker's son was diagnosed with an infection, but the nurse practitioner refused to give medication. The speaker questioned this decision and began recording the interaction. The situation escalated, with security being called. The speaker expressed frustration and threatened to share the video with others.

I'm arresting you for offensive comments on Facebook. You'll be taken to the police station, where we'll interview you. Bring your medications. A nurse will assess them later. We'll search you before leaving. Do you want to bring your glasses?

I broke the law, and you've been posting concerning things. Are you going to let me talk? You won't let me talk. It's in the notes. Do you want me to explain? There's been concerning behavior with no explanation at my house. I'm just telling you what's happened. We've had no explanation of the concerning things. There was a leak of flames. I tried to get in my house before it's clear. That's my supervisor; don't talk to her like that.

I was having a private conversation about a mass deportation protest when the bus driver told me I couldn't ride. He insisted I leave the bus because of my discussion on the protest. I explained that I have sciatica and have the right to ride. The driver accused me of being racist, which was unrelated to our conversation. I asserted that I hadn't done anything wrong and questioned his authority to kick me off. He claimed he had the right to dismiss me for upsetting him or security. I mentioned that recording is allowed as I am a journalist, but he insisted it was problematic. I threatened to sue for being kicked off unjustly. Another passenger mentioned I was holding up the bus, but I wanted to understand the reasoning behind being asked to leave.

I'm getting off this plane, and I have my reasons. People either don't believe me or can't accept it, but I don't care. That person back there is not real. You can choose to stay on this plane and face whatever happens, but I refuse to do that.

The speaker confronts two individuals for jeopardizing the safety of the aircraft. They express their disappointment and mention that they feel threatened. One of the individuals insists on a sobriety test and claims to work with children. The speaker criticizes their behavior, stating that they are loud and seeking attention. They emphasize that everyone should follow instructions and mention that they have kids waiting for them at home. The speaker reiterates that the individuals should have behaved properly and followed guidelines.

A person recounts an incident where a Delta employee intentionally misgendered them multiple times. The person confronts the employee, who denies it was intentional. The person warns the employee about their authority to escort them out of the building if they continue. The person decides to ignore the situation and puts on something.

Speaker 1 explains that they had a bad experience on a flight where the person next to them stole their AirPods. Speaker 2 asks about their plan and mentions that there were reports of assault, but the person who was allegedly assaulted doesn't want to press charges. Speaker 1 says they are going home and will arrange for someone to pick them up. Speaker 2 reminds them that they can't stay at the airport if they have no business there. Speaker 1 agrees and says they will request a ride.

Where's the leader? Who's in charge here? You’re treating us like criminals. This is unacceptable. That’s my father inside, and my wife is in there too. Can you please back up? I’m already backed up; I haven’t moved.

The speaker informs Speaker 1 that they need to leave or they will be arrested for trespassing. Speaker 1 expresses disbelief and asks if they are serious. Speaker 0 confirms and instructs everyone to go to the unsecured side where the ticket counter can assist them. Speaker 1 clarifies that they are not there for a flight but on a layover. Speaker 0 asks if they are trying to go to Tampa and mentions the possibility of getting a shot and going to jail. Speaker 1 explains they didn't ask because they already have tickets. Speaker 0 reiterates that if they don't have valid tickets and refuse to leave the secured side, they will be arrested. Speaker 1 argues that they do have valid tickets, just not to Washington, DC or Phoenix. Speaker 0 mentions Southwest Gates and the need to close a gate. Speaker 1 acknowledges they are not calling or asking for information. Speaker 0 insists they need to go to the ticket counter outside of security. Speaker 1 thanks them.

They didn't let us go today. I take responsibility for that. I know you care, buddy.

In Maine, Arkansas, officer Sergeant Eddie Price responded to a father’s report that his son was missing after a custody dispute. The father had full custody and said the mother was supposed to return the child. Five days passed without the child arriving; the father then went to the mother’s house, found the mother gone, and said the grandmother moved out of town the day after. He tried to get police to file a missing child report, but he claimed he was treated as a “dirtbag” while the officers delayed filing the report despite his stated custody rights. The transcript describes footage showing what the father alleges is Eddie Price assaulting him while he tries to get the missing person report filed and entered into the database. The father repeatedly demands to “open the missing persons report” and asks why it is being delayed. He questions the instruction not to enter his son into the missing persons system, stating he wants the location recorded because the child’s location is unknown and he is the only person the child is supposed to be with. During the exchange, the father challenges Officer Price about who told him not to file the report. Officer Price cites that he was told to delay because “Chief Stewart said he was handling the situation,” which the father says does not answer his question. The conversation includes the father asking how the child does not meet the criteria for missing status, and Officer Price responding with conditions about refusing emergency services. The father denies that he is receiving refusal as described and continues pressing for where the child is supposed to be. Near the end, the father says, “Thank you very much, Officer Price,” and references that the situation involved no threat or injury to the officer. He then says, “I think he hit his head on the” as the transcript cuts off.

Speaker describes getting a seat when an agent liked his approach and moved others. "How do you do that? Walk through that approach. I try all the time." He notes the typical reply, "flight's full. We can't do anything," and adds, "Because you come up there and you ask the same way as everybody else did." He says, "Did you walk up and go, how are you today? That's an indicator you gotta ask." He recalls, "I probably feel like the biggest jerk you ever saw in your life." His son quips, "I'm here to sign up for the mistake of the day award, and I am the dumbest customer that you are gonna see." The clerk smiles, finishes typing, and says, "alright, what do you got?" He concludes, "The amount of power the people in the airlines have on those keyboards is astonishing."

Why are you getting in my face like this? We can't talk man to man? There's only one man standing here. I might have to call TSA to remove you from the plane. Why would they do that? You keep telling yourself that. The government assigned your identity at birth. That’s my life, dictated by a greater power. I don’t feel that way. It seems like this is primarily a mental health issue. I’m not the authority on that. You need to get out of his way. I agree. Thank you, sir.