TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses the spread of bird flu and the potential for mass culling of poultry. They mention the development of bird flu vaccines and the possibility of human-to-human transmission. The conversation also touches on the lack of human trials for vaccines and the FDA's approval process based on preclinical data. The focus is on the need for vaccination, particularly for farm workers.

We isolated coronaviruses from animals in the past to understand their threat to other species by culturing them on different cell types. This process, known as gain of function, involves enriching mutants that can infect new species. The speaker emphasizes that mass vaccination in humans is a significant gain of function experiment, leading to virus evolution. This real-world experiment involves constant virus changes due to human-to-human transmission under vaccine pressure.

Vaccines must be carefully studied to ensure they do not worsen infections. Past vaccines, like the respiratory syncytial virus vaccine for children, have unexpectedly made things worse. Similarly, an HIV vaccine increased infection risk in some cases. It's crucial to conduct thorough studies in high-risk populations to understand how vaccines truly impact infections before widespread use.

Speaker 0 contends that vaccination has always been a systematic poisoning of humanity. He traces this idea back to the era of smallpox, asserting that vaccines have long been made using sick animals, and that animal infections have been introduced into humanity through vaccination. He asserts that there is a barrier God put between humans and animals to prevent blood, pus, and biological mixing, and that this barrier is violated when substances are injected into muscles. He claims that the consequences of injecting such materials are dire. Regarding autoimmune concerns, Speaker 0 states that this phenomenon is not new and frames it as something that has not been previously encountered in this context. He mentions a scientist named Darja Kanduc (d a r j a k a n d u c), who he says has for years been publicly discussing autoimmune phenomena related to vaccines. He attributes Kanduc’s work to Italy, noting her criticism of various vaccines and the idea that there is an autoimmune response associated with them. Speaker 0 explains Kanduc’s position by describing how the immune system is designed to tolerate bacteria that we are naturally endowed with, unless those bacteria invade. In contrast, he says that injecting viruses, particles, and bacterial particles—along with adjuvants and other substances that cause inflammation—creates a situation in which autoimmune reactions are inherent. He emphasizes that this outcome is not universal for everyone, but he asserts that it is inherent to the process. In summary, Speaker 0 presents the view that vaccines introduce harmful biological material into the body, bypass natural barriers between humans and animals, and provoke autoimmune responses as an inherent consequence of injecting viral and bacterial components with inflammatory agents. He anchors this claim in Kanduc’s work, which he describes as highlighting the autoimmune phenomenon associated with vaccines and the immune system’s intolerance of externally introduced microbial particles, especially when adjuvants and inflammatory triggers are present.

mRNA vaccines code for a small part of viral proteins, usually a single antigen. A single mutation can make the vaccine ineffective. This drives antigenic shift, where the vaccine encourages new mutations, prolonging pandemics as the virus mutates to escape the vaccine's protection. Millions caught the Omicron variant despite vaccination because a single mutation can render mRNA vaccines ineffective. The same risk applies to the flu.

H5N1 bird flu poses a significant threat, yet there's pressure to take an experimental vaccine for a virus that hasn't mutated to infect humans. Experts warn that administering such vaccines during a pandemic can accelerate mutations, potentially allowing viruses to jump to humans. Historical data shows that vaccines often fail to predict mutations accurately, leading to increased health issues for those who receive them. There are concerns about the origins of these viruses, with suggestions that they may have been weaponized in labs. The narrative seems aimed at creating fear and confusion, relying on public ignorance. It's crucial for experts to speak out on these matters.

"They've obviously developed some type of natural immunity because they're not clinically sick." "The worry is the virus can mutate, become even more pathogenic, cause much more disease." "Their solution? Just kill them all, wipe it out." "But it's now in the wild bird population." "How is it that you know we can wipe out all these big healthy birds on a farm and somehow think we're going to control that disease?" "Destroy the birds, you destroy the science." "Cruelty to animals, it violates the criminal code of Canada." "Couldn't the ostriches just been quarantined where they are, it's a very isolated spot, repeatedly tested for the avian flu?" "Why can there not be some type of flexibility?" "Risk science it's here. Too bad all your birds are gonna die." "In my opinion, yeah there really could have been and should have been and should be."

The transmission of avian bird flu from animals to humans is rare. We should allow farms with chickens and cows to develop natural immunity, as they are constantly being reinfected by migratory mallard ducks and waterfowl. The practice of culling is not effective.

The speaker discusses the accidental contamination of a vaccine with live avian flu virus, which is virtually impossible according to government officials and top vaccine scientists. The vaccine, produced by Baxter, contained the deadly h5n1 avian flu virus and was distributed to 18 countries. The speaker suggests that this contamination may have been intentional, as mixing the avian flu virus with other flu viruses in the vaccine could create a potent, super airborne, and deadly bioweapon. The speaker also mentions the history of government involvement in bioweapons and genetic engineering, highlighting the potential dangers of these practices.

Dr. Cardcaine, an epidemiologist from the University of Michigan, is identified as the person who broke the story in February about a bird flu outbreak linked to the USDA research lab. He states that mainstream media are not reporting on this development. He also asserts that Peter Hotez will not tell the public about this information. According to the speaker, the current strain of bird flu in this outbreak was created in a lab through serial passage conducted in a U.S. government laboratory. The claim specifies that this lab-driven process enabled the virus to jump from traditional chickens to migratory waterfowl. From there, the outbreak purportedly spread to cows, marking a transition from poultry to other species in the ecosystem. The narrative presented emphasizes that the origin and progression of the outbreak are laboratory-generated, rather than arising solely from natural spillover events. The speaker highlights that the virus was manipulated via serial passage in a government lab, a technique used to adapt pathogens to new hosts or improve transmissibility. The sequence described claims a progression: initial adaptation in poultry, transmission to migratory waterfowl, and subsequent appearance in cattle. The speaker underscores two supplementary points: first, that major media outlets have not reported on this angle of the outbreak; second, that a well-known public figure in the field, Peter Hotez, is portrayed as someone who would supposedly not disclose this information. The overall message portrays a narrative of concealment and laboratory involvement in the emergence and spread of the bird flu across species, culminating in its presence in cows. In summary, the speaker attributes the outbreak to deliberate laboratory manipulation via serial passage in a U.S. government facility, tracing a path from chickens to migratory waterfowl and then to cows, while accusing mainstream media of omission and suggesting that Peter Hotez would not disclose these details.

The speakers discuss the expected mutation of the virus and the impact of vaccination. They acknowledge that as people become immunized, the virus will try to find ways to evade the vaccine. The more people are vaccinated, the more pressure is put on the virus to mutate. Some virologists warn that vaccinating the entire world with narrow immunity could lead to the emergence of superbugs. They urge for the use of the right vaccine in the right place and caution against mass vaccination during a pandemic. They argue that current interventions and mass vaccination may be causing more harm than good, driving the emergence of more infectious and potentially lethal variants.

Birds don't get flu. Birds do not get influenza. Birds can get sick, but they haven't got flu, and it's not contagious. So, the PCR test is a measure of nothing. It's fraud. So and they could make the birds sick in any number of ways just by treating them badly. If they overcrowd them, that will make them sick. If they stress them, that will make them sick. And if they then come in and test them, they can claim bird flu in the flock, then they can kill all the birds, and then they can say, oh, look. Bird flu is going around. It doesn't even exist because like I told you, birds don't get colds. Birds don't sneeze. Have you ever seen a bird coughing? And I wouldn't think monkeys get pox either. Really. They're hairy.

The speaker discusses the development of vaccines and raises concerns about a specific type of research called gain-of-function. They suggest that this research involves making viruses more dangerous and could potentially be used to create bio weapons. They mention that Anthony Fauci, a prominent figure in the field, received a raise for his involvement in this research. In 2014, three dangerous viruses escaped from labs in the US, leading 300 scientists to urge President Obama to shut down Fauci's gain-of-function research. Although a moratorium was issued, the research was moved offshore, including to a Chinese lab in Wuhan.

The mRNA in vaccines can replicate, including the replication engine, leading to potential spread from person to person. Concerns exist about the inability to stop this replication, with unknown consequences for humanity. The spike protein in these vaccines can be toxic, affecting various tissues. Deployment of this technology in vaccines for humans is already happening, with over 4,000 people injected in Japan.

The transcript argues that more dangerous SARS-CoV-2 variants could arise by creating biological niches for variants and through VADES, with the speaker stating that “viral immune escape threatens to play a catastrophic role in the COVID mass vaccinated world.” It describes the virus as originally relatively harmless with a very low death percentage for healthy young people, potentially evolving into a seasonal virus with an even lower death percentage. However, it is claimed that mass vaccination could disturb this natural progression and cause resistant, and potentially more dangerous and more contagious variants by creating biological niches for those variants. The speaker asserts a correlation between the rise of variants and the increase of vaccinations, stating that “the rise of variants correlates with the increase of vaccinations.” In this context, viral immune escape is mentioned, and antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) is noted as a phenomenon that can worsen disease; the speaker notes that ADE is known to be an issue with coronaviruses and was an issue in animal trials for SARS vaccines, and is associated with SARS and severe COVID itself. The claim is made that as more vaccines and different vaccine types are administered, and as more COVID variants succeed, the ADE risk increases. According to the speaker, given these considerations, the worldwide mass vaccination agenda is described as a “haste and rush agenda,” very dangerous and destined to become a failure. The speaker questions whether “the mass vaccination induced immune escape COVID killing waves and vades” are coming for the COVID vaccinated. To illustrate the situation, the transcript cites a series of record-high stretcher occupancy values in Quebec, across several dates in 2024: 07/08/2024 – 2,319; 07/08/2024 – 2,370; 08/06/2024 – 2,384; 08/27/2024 – 2,395; 08/24/24 – 2,412; 09/03/2024 – 2,444. The source cited is Sourcetumia.org, with a request to “please like and follow.”

The concerning issue is that the virus can infect multiple species, including pigs, which are often in close proximity to chickens and cows. This interaction raises the risk of a reassortment of viruses, potentially creating a new strain that combines the dangerous traits of H5N1 with the ability to spread between humans. Public health officials are particularly worried about this possibility due to the mixing of viruses in pigs. Although the current risk is considered low, the CDC emphasizes the need for vigilance as the situation could change.

Evolution is random, but when a virus evolves naturally, it's through random mutation. However, when a virus is created in a lab, it's not random but man-made. Creating a virus in the lab to discover what could happen in nature is unlikely to result in a vaccine that helps. This controversy started in 2010 with the avian flu, which is deadly but not very contagious. A scientist in the Netherlands aerosolized it, causing a debate on whether the knowledge should be published due to potential misuse. Anthony Fauci supported publishing the knowledge, despite the risks. Government funding of gain of function research, which involves making viruses more dangerous, continued despite a pause from 2014 to '16. The culpability extends beyond Fauci to the government.

Research on bird flu in laboratories has raised significant concerns. At the Scripps Institute in California, funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and NIH, scientists identified mutations that could enhance the virus's ability to infect humans, sharing their findings in the journal Science. Similarly, Yoshihiro Kawaoka at the University of Wisconsin has conducted gain-of-function research on bird flu for decades, experiencing multiple lab accidents with modified strains. In the Netherlands, Ron Fouchier at Erasmus Medical Center has been working on making bird flu airborne using ferrets. This ongoing research poses substantial risks, and there are calls to halt gain-of-function studies to prevent potential leaks and misuse of information.

There are three basic vaccine technologies, none of which are safe. The three technologies are live attenuated vaccines, killed-virus/virus-fragment vaccines with adjuvants, and mRNA vaccines. Live attenuated vaccines can cause one person a tiny mild infection while another may suffer a more serious one, and they can evolve and spread; though not supposed to be contagious, they can produce contagious effects. For example, the polio vaccine, live attenuated, has created many polio cases, an intolerable downside. The killed-virus approach doesn't reliably stimulate immunity unless an adjuvant is used; adjuvants are nonspecific and can trigger widespread immune activation. The mRNA approach is unsafe because it moves haphazardly through the body, causing cells to produce foreign antigens, which the immune system may attack as virally infected, potentially deadly in the heart, and tissue destruction elsewhere. In sum, three technologies, none fundamentally safe, with severe downsides.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: Hi, it's Robert F. Kennedy Jr. here, your HHS secretary. At HHS, we have a division called the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, or BARDA. BARDA drives some of our most advanced scientific research. It funds developments of vaccines, drugs, diagnostics, and other tools to fight emerging diseases and national health threats. Over the past few weeks, BARDA reviewed 22 mRNA vaccine development investments and began canceling them. Let me explain why. Most of these shots are for flu or COVID, but as the pandemic showed us, mRNA vaccines don't perform well against viruses that infect the upper respiratory tract. Here's the problem: mRNA only codes for a small part of the viral proteins, usually a single antigen. One mutation and the vaccine becomes ineffective. This dynamic drives a phenomena called antigenic shift, meaning that the vaccine paradoxically encourages new mutations and can actually prolong pandemics as the virus constantly mutates to escape the protective effects of the vaccine. Millions of people, maybe even you or someone you know, caught the omicron variant despite being vaccinated. That's because a single mutation can make mRNA vaccines ineffective. The same risk applies to flu. After reviewing the science and consulting top experts at NIH and FDA, HHS has determined that mRNA technology poses more risk than benefits for these respiratory viruses. That's why after extensive review, BARDA has begun the process of terminating these 22 contracts totaling just under $500,000,000 To replace the troubled mRNA programs, we're prioritizing the development of the safer, broader vaccine strategies, like whole virus vaccines and novel platforms that don't collapse when viruses mutate. Let me be absolutely clear: HHS supports safe, effective vaccines for every American who wants them. That's why we're moving beyond the limitations of mRNA for respiratory viruses and investing in better solutions. Thank you. Produced by the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services.

A prototype vaccine is being deployed to the public without actually preventing transmission, which is keeping the disease more dangerous than necessary. This is a concerning public health response. The problem is that even if we acknowledge this issue, we don't know how to change it. People tend to believe that public health authorities are doing the right thing because the alternative seems hopeless. It's difficult to discredit them without sounding like they are deliberately harming public health. People find it hard to accept that medical officials in charge of our lives may have bad motivations.

A vaccine that cannot block transmission should never be used on the battlefield. Mass vaccination with such a vaccine generates a breeding ground for more infectious variants. There is no scientific rationale to vaccinate children, and no added value for them. There are only major concerns and risks; the risk-benefit ratio is completely wrong. Vaccination provides no chance of contributing to herd immunity. Under no circumstances should you allow your child to be vaccinated. It risks inducing auto-immune responses in children.

Vaccines can sometimes have unexpected effects. In some cases, vaccinating someone against a disease can actually make them more susceptible to the infection. This has happened before with vaccines like the respiratory syncytial virus vaccine in children and an HIV vaccine that was tested a few years ago. So, it's important to carefully evaluate the safety of vaccines before administering them.

Researchers have been working on making bird flu more contagious for humans through gain of function research. The virus mainly infects chickens and sometimes cattle. Chinese vaccination efforts in the 90s may have worsened the situation. The current strain, H5N1 avian influenza, has caused around 800-900 human cases with a high mortality rate in Southeast Asia. Recent US cases were easily treated. The virus is not a significant threat unless it starts spreading human to human. The recent strain may have originated from experiments on mallard ducks in Georgia, leading to its spread across states. The media has not questioned this spread caused by migratory waterfowl.

If we ignore the problem of felons in the US, we'll face more issues like H5N2 bird flu. The alleged H5N, avian influenza, is available for sale on the BEI Resources website since 2016. The concern lies in gain of function research in labs, where the recipe to make bird flu highly infectious for humans is already known.