reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker questions the legitimacy of the president's birth certificate, stating that it took him 18 months to obtain one from Hawaii, while he was able to expedite birth certificates for his staff members in just 48 hours. The speaker also raises doubts about the president's education, mentioning that his ex-wife wanted their son to attend the same expensive school the president allegedly went to. The speaker concludes by mentioning two individuals who boasted about their connections to Hollywood and Hawaii.

A respected and powerful Wall Street businessman wouldn't be suspected of fraud unless you knew the math. The speaker, who has taken calculus, linear algebra, and statistics courses, claims it took him five minutes to recognize the fraud. He then spent almost four hours using mathematical modeling to prove it.

This video presents two long-form birth certificates from Hawaii, one belonging to Barack Obama and the other to Johanna Ami. The Maricopa County Sheriff's Office claims that Obama's birth certificate was digitally created using Ami's as a source document. They point out nine points of forgery, including copied words, letters, and date stamps. The video examines the angles of the date stamps and highlights the lack of similarity between stamps on Ami's birth certificate and those of Susan and Gretchen Nordyke, who were born minutes apart. The video concludes that the identical angles on Obama's and Ami's birth certificates indicate forgery. It also discusses the pulling over of Xs and boxes from Ami's certificate to Obama's.

Speaker 0: "We still have, basically confirmation he got shot. ... immediate incapacitation." He asserts "the FBI is lying" and that "it's quite literally not possible for the shooter to have been on the roof that they claim he is along with other inconsistencies across the board." Speaker 1: "Keep your eye on this space here... the bullet matches the exit wound, ... the shirt puffing up and the angle of the entry and exit." He adds: "the same what appears to be the bullet coming down and it does line up with the actual gunshot itself." From Google Earth, "the shooter was up here somewhere, that's the angle that the bullet was coming down from." "the shooter was most likely here somewhere." "Somewhere on those stairs would be my tip, and if the FBI aren't looking there, I don't know why."

The speaker asserts a 100% proof that Ashley Babbitt was not shot and begins by giving credit to Jesus Christ, stating that “his spirit, his spirit of truth that revealed to my heart that something was off.” They claim to have spent a lot of time analyzing the videos. The speaker references John Sullivan’s footage and claims that “the gun” makes a quick movement, and that it is shooting “really low in comparison to Ashley Babbitt's neck.” They point to the upper right-hand corner of the frame, asserting that “you’ll see something move,” and claim that “we get the rare opportunity of seeing the travel of the bullet.” Returning to a scene from mainstream media, the speaker describes Helmet Boy bashing the windows and moving toward the final window—“the one that must have been installed with thumbtacks because he knocks it out in one shot.” They observe the wooden window trim and propose that it will be hit by the pathway of the bullet, asking the audience to watch and stating, “Did you see that?” The speaker claims to have obtained “a clear shot of which way the bullet actually went after it left the gun.” They state that viewers might think the bullet hit the window trim and then Ashley Babbitt, which they argue could happen if the shooter were in front of Ashley, but claim instead that “the shooter is shooting from the side of Ashley.” Consequently, they declare that what they have shown provides “a really clear shot that Ashley Babbitt did not get shot by that bullet.”

The speaker explains that they were asked to investigate President Obama's birth certificate due to suspicions of fraud. They clarify that their investigation was not about where the president was born, but about the authenticity of the document. They express their hope that the document would be valid, but after examining the evidence, they conclude that it is a fraudulently created document. They mention the criticism they faced for questioning the document and emphasize that their goal was always to uncover the truth. They introduce a video presentation that reveals evidence of forgery in the birth certificate, including identical angles in date stamps and copied elements from another birth certificate.

This video presents two birth certificates from Hawaii, one belonging to Barack Obama and the other to Johanna Ami. The Maricopa County Sheriff's Office claims that Obama's birth certificate was digitally created using Ami's document. They point out nine instances of forgery, including copied words, letters, and date stamps. The video examines the angles of the stamps and highlights the lack of similarity between the stamps on Ami's birth certificate and those of Susan and Gretchen Nordyke, who were born minutes apart. The video concludes that the identical angles on Obama's and Ami's birth certificates indicate forgery. It also discusses the copying of Xs and boxes from Ami's document onto Obama's.

During the Arizona audit, Maricopa County made it clear that signature verification was off-limits. However, it's easy to understand why they didn't want us to examine the signatures because, in reality, they don't match.

The speaker states that their investigation into President Obama's birth certificate has concluded that it is a fraudulently created document. They express their initial hope that the document was valid, but as evidence stacked up, they had to follow the evidence. They mention working with document examiner Reed Hayes and forensic digital technicians from 4 Labs in Italy. They show examples of forgery in the birth certificate, including copied words, letters, and date stamps. The speaker emphasizes that their investigation was not about Obama personally, but about the document itself. They conclude by saying that the findings are new, profound, and disturbing.

Sheriff Joe Arpaio suspects that President Obama's birth certificate is a fake. His team of volunteer investigators believes the birth certificate is computer-generated and they have a person of interest in the hoax. Arpaio suggests that Congress should take on the investigation next. Michael Zullo, the head of the investigation team, claims that their goal was initially to prove the document's authenticity but the evidence led them to conclude that it was manufactured. The White House responded by referring to the president's previous comments on the issue. Zullo challenges critics to prove their point and states that they have already proven theirs. Arpaio may seek a congressional investigation. The birth certificate failed every test and inconsistencies were found in the document. The investigation videos were uploaded to YouTube by the user Tea Party Power Hour.

Speaker 0 presents a very quick briefing and discusses the credibility of the different things they've seen. They say, "these files were made up by the sea. They were made up by Obama. They were made" as a claim about the files’ origin, with the sentence trailing off in the transcript.

The speaker discusses the investigation into Barack Obama's birth certificate. They mention working with forensic document examiners and digital technicians to analyze two birth certificates from Hawaii. The speaker claims that nine points of forgery were found, including copied words, letters, and date stamps. They focus on the similarity of the angles of the date stamps on both birth certificates, suggesting intentional alteration. The speaker concludes that the birth certificate belonging to Johanna Ani was used as a source document for Obama's birth certificate. They emphasize the significance of these findings and the disturbing nature of the situation.

The speaker is convinced that Barack Obama's birth certificate released by the White House is altered. They demonstrate this by showing the layers in the document and how some parts disappear when certain layers are turned off. They mention that the background, which is the safety paper, remains intact while other information appears to be altered. The speaker questions why there would be a need to cover up the document and concludes that it is indeed altered. They leave it up to the viewers to decide.

Barack Obama's alleged birth certificate was released on the official White House website. The birth certificate was in PDF format, which can retain editing data. By opening the PDF in Adobe Illustrator, the layers and edits made to the document were revealed. Multiple layers were added, including a fake signature and altered dates. The inconsistencies in colors and pixels indicate that the document was manipulated. It is clear that the birth certificate is a fake, poorly done and easily detectable. The authenticity of the real birth certificate remains unknown.

A scanner can only scan one dollar per second, but there are 4,000 ballots with the exact same time stamp of November 5th at 11:19:40. This suggests that these ballots may have been inserted and cannot be authenticated. The main question is whether this time stamp, which shows an unbelievable speed of scanning, is from the EMS system and not something we created.

The speaker, a professional designer, downloaded Obama's long-form birth certificate PDF from the obamawhitehousearchives.gov website. Opening the document in Adobe Illustrator, the speaker claims to have found bounding boxes that, when deleted, allow the entire background document to be moved off the page. The speaker asserts the document has been completely photo-edited with a ghosting effect. The speaker also claims the background pattern repeats and curls around in a strange way. According to the speaker, the entire document has separate components, and the date stamps are two different colors that can be moved separately. The speaker expresses disbelief at the poor quality of the alleged Photoshop job.

The speaker analyzes the iconic photo and argues that a bullet cannot be captured frame-by-frame at 30 frames per second; at 1,500–3,000 feet per second, a single frame would show the bullet moving about 45 feet, producing only a streak, not a frozen dot. He rejects claims of a bullet frozen in mid-air. Regarding the moment near the neck, he says there was no blood and that the second of impact could have been a necklace exploding, not an earpiece, and questions how a chain could snap and blow back over the ears. He notes camera shutter speeds of 1/164,000th or 1/120,000th of a second and argues a NYT photographer would have needed such settings to capture the moment, which he sees as improbably random. He concludes no one caught a bullet moving in Charlie Kirk’s vicinity.

So everyone knows that these text messages are insanely fake, right? No one refers to their car as a vehicle, unless you're in law enforcement. Nobody says squad car. You would just say, Oh my God, I just saw a cop. No 22 year old refers to their parent as my old man. I left the rifle wrapped in a towel. Nobody would write step by step. And when he talks about the engravings, he says, mostly a big meme. You gotta read these texts for yourself, because nobody talks like this. Nobody texts like this, and no young person uses the words vehicle, drop point. This is just way too convenient.

Reed Hayes, a respected document examiner with over 40 years of experience, was asked to examine a document related to Barack Obama's birth certificate. Despite being an Obama supporter, Hayes found issues with the document and couldn't clear it. Working with forensic experts, the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office discovered nine points of forgery in Obama's birth certificate, suggesting that it was digitally created using another person's birth certificate as a source. The experts found similarities in the angle of date stamps and Xs, indicating manipulation. The investigation aimed to prove innocence but uncovered evidence of forgery. The findings were sent to independent examiners in Italy and Hawaii, who confirmed the discrepancies.

Questions the claim that 'some random trans shooter was on the roof, took this shot, runs across into the rooftop, jumps down, somehow magically being undetected because the FBI releases a a video footage.' He asks if he had 'planted the gun on the roof prior' and how he could 'walk back in the second time without the weapon.' He questions why 'we don't have any images of this kid leaving the school' or 'any video footage of this kid jumping off the roof,' and notes he 'runs roughly one mile with a long arm rifle in broad daylight to stash it in the woods' while wearing 'an American flag shirt.' He doubts the FBI photo is the best they can provide and references 'criminal minds' and 'the BAU' that would 'rerender that image' to be 'pixel perfect' with 'face recognition software.' Contrasts movie-like tech with reality, calling it 'weird.'

After an intense investigation, the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office concludes that Barack Obama's long form birth certificate contains nine points of forgery. They believe that words, letters, and date stamps were digitally copied from Johanna Ami's birth certificate and pasted onto Obama's. The document examiners found identical angles in the date stamps of both certificates, despite them being stamped 16 days apart. This suggests intentional alteration. The examiners also found that the Xs in Boxes 6D and 6E of Obama's PDF were taken directly from Ani's birth certificate, including the box itself and parts of the line on top of the Xs.

We know that there are several books that claim to be the authentic diary. People involved in the story described these books as having checkered covers and rounded corners. However, a Swedish photograph shows that the book he's holding has square corners and is a substantial book with around 400 or 500 pages. It's certainly not a schoolgirl's book. This pictorial evidence suggests that there must have been numerous books. The one he's holding here is more like a company's ledger book and not like a child's school book. In a forensic study, if you can't describe a car's color, number of wheels, or whether it's a truck, your testimony would be thrown out of court. Mr. Frank apparently cannot describe with any degree of consistency what his daughter's diary actually looks like or how long it is or what kind of book it occupies.

The speaker discusses the discrepancies in the date stamps and other elements of Barack Obama's birth certificate. They explain that the stamps on the document do not match exactly, indicating that it may be a forgery. They conducted extensive investigations and consulted forensic experts who concluded that the birth certificate is fraudulent. The speaker also mentions their attempts to validate the document with the state of Hawaii and Kapiolani Medical Center, but they were met with resistance. They emphasize the need for thorough vetting of documents presented by public officials and call for standardization of security paper for birth certificates.

The speaker argues that the DNA X-ray picture and related genetic science are part of a long-standing scam. They claim the “first X-ray” of DNA was actually done on salt, not on human DNA, and question how anyone can describe DNA as a double helix when the initial X-ray picture came from salt. They assert that identifying a criminal’s DNA, conducting PCR to amplify it, and declaring guilt are all part of a deception. The speaker clusters DNA, paternity testing, COVID testing, and claims of genetic diseases as examples of a broader fabrication, describing society as living in a “land of make believe.” They extend the critique to spike protein, calling it “made up” and alleging it is another sales tactic, specifically noting pine tea as part of the marketing. The speaker contends that everything from viruses to RNA to DNA to spike proteins to shedding and other related narratives are stories built upon one another, and that once you understand that viruses are fake, all the related stories collapse. The metaphor used is that of an “adapter to the adapter to the adapter,” implying a chain of manufactured explanations designed to support these claims. The speaker also remarks that some misinformation or odd trends appear in everyday products, citing “gluten free nail polish” as a stylized example, and suggests they are compelled to sign off and stop engaging with the topic, indicating a sense of overwhelm or inability to continue discussing it. Key claims highlighted include: the first DNA X-ray was done on salt; the DNA double helix concept is therefore questionable; PCR and DNA-based guilt (criminal identification, paternity tests, and disease diagnoses) are part of a fraudulent framework; spike protein and related virus narratives are not genuine; many biological concepts are fabricated and rely on a chain of misleading stories; and there are odd, unrelated trends in products (such as gluten free nail polish) used to illustrate the pervasiveness of misinformation. The speaker signals an abrupt exit from the discussion.

Sheriff Joe Arpaio and Mike Zullo present their investigation into a document that was presented as President Obama's birth certificate. They clarify that the investigation was not about where Obama was born, but rather about the authenticity of the document. They mention two separate experts from different continents who reached similar conclusions. Arpaio emphasizes that they were trying to clear the president but had to follow the evidence. Zullo explains his motive was to clear the document but ended up finding evidence of forgery. They mention a document examiner, Reed Hayes, who couldn't clear the document and continued to investigate. They emphasize that their investigation was about the document, not Obama himself.