reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A Council of Europe health chief has accused major pharmaceutical firms of organizing a panic campaign and unduly influencing World Health Organization (WHO) decisions regarding swine flu. This official seeks an investigation into the WHO's decision to lower the threshold for declaring a pandemic, which triggered pre-prepared government contracts for drugs and vaccines. The investigation aims to determine if pharmaceutical companies influenced WHO decisions and if there were inappropriate ties between key WHO advisors and drug companies. Questions are being raised about whether the perceived danger of swine flu was exaggerated by pharmaceutical companies to increase profits. Governments are now burdened with bills for millions of unwanted vaccine doses.

Pharmaceutical giants like GSK, Sanofi, Novartis, and Baxter have been given the green light by the WHO to sell millions of vaccines, resulting in billions of euros in revenue. However, concerns have been raised about the WHO's handling of the pandemic. The organization is accused of easily declaring a pandemic by changing the definition, removing the criteria of a high number of cases and deaths. This change has allowed the pharmaceutical companies to profit from the situation. It is revealed that contracts for vaccines were signed between wealthy countries and the companies in 2005, with the condition that the WHO declares a pandemic. Furthermore, conflicts of interest are highlighted, as many experts advising the WHO also work for these pharmaceutical companies. The race for vaccine production is now underway.

Former Italian health minister Roberto Speranza is being investigated for homicide after emails revealed that he knew the COVID-19 vaccines were causing deaths and serious side effects. He allegedly ordered local health authorities to conceal this information in order to maintain public confidence in the vaccination campaign. The investigation is based on complaints regarding internal emails from the Italian Medicines Agency. Speranza and the former director of the agency, Niccolo Magrini, are accused of knowingly exposing the Italian population to the risks associated with the vaccines. The investigation includes charges of murder and serious bodily harm.

The transcript features two speakers discussing crisis communication during an influenza event and a related lecture. In a lecture excerpt from 01/22/2019 at Chatham House, Belgian top virologist Marc Van Ranst is described as explaining how he “fooled the entire Belgian population during the swine flu,” through fear mongering, out of context mortality rates, and media manipulation. The excerpt states that he laughingly explains how he managed to impose the vaccine for the swine flu on the frightened Belgian population, a vaccine produced by the pharmaceutical companies he worked for. Speaker 1, identified as Abbe, thanks the audience and then provides an account of experiences as the crisis manager and flu commissioner for Belgium, focusing on communication. He emphasizes that there is one opportunity to do it right, noting that day one is extremely important. He describes the initial communication strategy: start with one voice and one message. Belgium chose to appoint a non-politician to handle the role, someone with no party affiliations, which he says makes things easier because you are not attacked politically by majority or minority considerations. He notes this as a huge advantage at the time. Speaker 1 further explains that being able to “play in Brussels the complete naive guy” allowed more to get done than would otherwise be possible. He stresses the need to be omnipresent on the first day or the initial days to attract media attention. He mentions making an agreement with the media to tell them everything, implying a transparent or forthcoming approach during the early crisis phase. Overall, the transcript juxtaposes a controversial claim attributed to Van Ranst regarding manipulation and vaccination in Belgium with a practical description of crisis communication strategy in Belgium, emphasizing consistent messaging, nonpartisan leadership, and proactive, pervasive engagement with the media in the crucial early days.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has been accused of being a criminal cartel that has manipulated public health for profit, leading to widespread harm. The speaker argues that the WHO's actions, including the handling of vaccines and the COVID-19 pandemic, reflect a long history of deceit and exploitation. They assert that the organization was founded with the intent to commit crimes, using tactics that prioritize profit over public health. The speaker emphasizes the need to recognize these actions as organized crime and calls for the dismantling of the WHO, rather than merely limiting its power. This is framed as a necessary step to address the alleged global terrorism and profiteering that has resulted from the WHO's operations.

The segment centers on the claim that government officials and the biopharma industry are redoing a “bird flu” scare with a high-profile summit in Washington, DC, while pushing vaccines through emergency authorization processes. Key points and claims - BARDA granted Moderna 176 million dollars to accelerate development of an emergency bird flu vaccine. The hosts emphasize that Moderna has never had a product reach the market through standard channels, implying prior success relied on emergency authorizations during the COVID pandemic. - The hosts assert that current bird flu is not contagious between humans and that treatments exist; they question how vaccine development can anticipate mutations “best guess” scenarios. They frame this as a repeat of the COVID playbook: using emergency use authorization to push a vaccine. - They note that the US and EU are reportedly using emergency orders to procure bird flu vaccines from CSL Securus, which they allege is funded and advised by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. - A three-day “International Bird Flu Summit” is described as taking place in early October in Washington, DC, with speakers and breakout sessions. They show the summit website and list breakout topics, including mass fatality management, fatality operations, continuity of government planning, operating with absenteeism, business continuity, remote work policies, and travel policy. - The hosts stress that the breakout sessions cover topics like “mass fatality management planning,” “continuity of government planning,” and “remote work policies,” suggesting the agenda extends beyond purely clinical topics into civil preparedness and governance. - They claim the summit is real and not a conspiracy, showing the conference site, sessions, and a contact phone line. They also note that attendees can pay for sessions (the price cited around $625 to attend) and vendors can participate. - The hosts recount an attempted inquiry to the Bird Flu Summit hotline. A caller (Clayton) asks why the summit is being held now, given bird flu’s long history and purported lack of human fatalities in the US. The response from the hotline staffer is described as evasive; she states this is the organization’s first year doing the conference, mentions “global transfer” and 13 viruses, but does not provide concrete virus-specific evidence to address the questions. The caller reports the staffer hung up after questions about evidence and the focus on population control and remote work. - They reference Dr. Peter McCullough’s stance that bird flu could become a pandemic and that authorities used fear during prior outbreaks. - Dr. Kelly Victory is cited arguing for available and effective medications to treat bird flu (e.g., hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, steroids) and suggesting that if authorities block these treatments in the name of vaccine deployment, people will resist. They imply mRNA vaccines are being positioned as central to the response, pointing to Forbes reporting on Moderna’s involvement in an mRNA bird flu shot. - The hosts tease future coverage, mentioning Max Jones and Unlimited Hangout, connecting the discussion to the broader narrative that biopharmaceutical interests seek to maintain pandemic preparedness for profit, particularly as profits decline when the public is not in a continual pandemic state. Additional context - The dialogue includes skeptical framing around the necessity and timing of the summit, the motivations behind it, and concerns about surveillance, lockdown readiness, and vaccine deployment. It also notes the appearance of a media segment with a critical stance toward the Bird Flu Summit’s stated goals and potential implications for public health policy.

The WHO is portrayed as a lobby organization funded by pharmaceutical companies and influenced by billionaires. It is claimed the WHO is not interested in public health. Governments are said to relinquish power to the WHO to avoid electoral repercussions for unpopular decisions. Politicians can then blame the WHO for policies like lockdowns and school closures, claiming they had no choice. This arrangement allegedly shields politicians from accountability.

Former Italian health minister Roberto Speranza is being investigated for homicide after emails revealed that he knew the COVID-19 vaccines were causing deaths and serious side effects. He allegedly ordered local health authorities to conceal this information in order to maintain public trust and support for the vaccination campaign. The investigation is based on complaints regarding the internal emails from the Italian Medicines Agency. Speranza and the former director of the agency, Niccolo Magrini, are both under investigation. The accusations include murder, serious bodily harm, and deliberate exposure of the Italian population to vaccine risks. The investigation follows mandatory vaccination for certain professional groups in Italy.

It seems that bird flu, a gain-of-function strain, is causing concern. The strain possibly originated from the USDA Poultry Research Lab in Georgia. Former CDC director Redfield mentioned that manipulating the virus could make it transmissible to humans. Interestingly, the director of the lab has ties to the Gates Foundation. This raises questions about the origins and implications of the outbreak.

A House committee is investigating Dr. Anthony Fauci's involvement with the CIA regarding COVID-19's origins. According to the committee, Fauci was escorted into CIA headquarters without record and participated in analysis to influence the agency's review. This follows a whistleblower claim that the CIA paid people to bury the lab leak theory. The committee is ordering HHS to provide documents detailing Fauci's movements during the pandemic, specifically in and out of CIA controlled sites.

A Dutch government official revealed that the COVID pandemic was orchestrated as a military operation under NATO orders, suggesting that forced vaccinations and lockdowns were part of a hidden agenda rather than public health measures. This admission could significantly impact the ongoing trial of Bill Gates and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla in the Netherlands, where they face accusations of misleading the public about COVID vaccinations. The Dutch health minister confirmed that pandemic preparedness was tied to treaty obligations and intelligence services. This revelation aligns with claims made by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. about the military's role in vaccine production. The discussion raises concerns about the true motives behind the pandemic and the need for accountability from those responsible for the global health crisis.

A Council of Europe health chief accused major pharmaceutical firms of organizing a panic campaign and unduly influencing World Health Organization (WHO) decisions regarding swine flu. European countries are burdened with bills for millions of unwanted vaccine doses, prompting calls for an investigation. The predictions for the impact of swine flu included 64,000 deaths, tens of thousands hospitalized, and a country crippled by the virus. The government spent hundreds of millions of pounds on antiviral drugs and vaccines. However, 10 months into the pandemic, only 355 Britons died, and globally, the virus hasn't lived up to fears. Politicians in Brussels are requesting an investigation into the role pharmaceutical companies played in influencing political decisions that led to a swine flu spending spree. The Council of Europe Committee wants the investigation to focus on the WHO's decision to lower the threshold required for a pandemic declaration and probe ties between key WHO advisors and drug companies. Some suspect the danger was vastly exaggerated by pharmaceutical companies to make money.

This pandemic is a complete fake. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) and the ethics committee, a pandemic is defined by the number of excess deaths and severe cases of an unknown or known disease. However, reports from Professor Toubiana and Professor Yoanniedis show that there were no excess deaths in France in 2020 compared to previous years. They argue that the PCR test, which replaced doctors, is a fraudulent tool that cannot diagnose anything. They claim that the PCR test is being used to justify lockdowns, economic shutdowns, and vaccinations. They also argue that the flu and other diseases have disappeared. They encourage people to question and challenge these fraudulent practices.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is facing criticism for its push to extend its powers and control over countries and people's self-determination. An independent evaluation will be conducted to review pandemic preparedness and response. The WHO's proposed pandemic treaty and international health regulations have raised concerns about its authority over health decisions, including vaccines, treatments, and surveillance. The treaty could impose restrictions, lockdowns, and experimental treatments without respecting human rights. The WHO claims absolute leadership in all health matters, but some argue that this level of authority has never been seen before. Supporters argue that these measures are necessary to protect the global population. The final vote on these agreements will take place in May 2024.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is facing criticism for seeking to extend its powers and control over countries and people's self-determination. The WHO's reform process, initiated after the COVID-19 crisis, aims to bring significant changes that will affect all member states. The organization is pushing for a pandemic treaty that would grant it authority over health decisions, including vaccines, treatments, and restrictions. Critics argue that the WHO has failed in its response to the pandemic and should not be given more power. The treaty, if approved, would be binding and could restrict individual liberties. Citizens are urged to pressure their political representatives to oppose these measures.

A small group of conspirators has manipulated global health organizations for profit, leading to widespread harm. The World Health Organization (WHO) has operated as a criminal cartel since its inception, prioritizing control and profit over public health. They employ a four-step process: planning, funding, creating rationale, and profiting from their actions. Evidence suggests that the WHO and its partners have engaged in unethical practices, including harmful vaccine trials. The funding structure, heavily reliant on the Gates Foundation, raises legal concerns. The narrative surrounding pandemics has been manipulated to instill fear and drive acceptance of vaccines. This situation is characterized as organized crime, requiring a reevaluation of the WHO's role and a call for its dismantlement rather than mere reform. The focus should be on addressing the criminal actions rather than debating public health measures.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is facing criticism for seeking to expand its powers and control over countries and people's self-determination. An independent evaluation will be conducted to improve pandemic preparedness, but the WHO's track record has raised doubts about its ability to handle such responsibilities. The WHO's proposed pandemic treaty aims to gain authority over health decisions of UN member nations, including vaccine mandates and distribution. Concerns have been raised about the lack of transparency in the decision-making process and the potential infringement on human rights. Citizens are urged to pressure their political representatives to ensure accountability and prevent the WHO from gaining unchecked power.

The speakers discuss the achievements of the World Health Organization (WHO) in the past two years. They mention that the WHO is passing amendments to international health regulations, which member countries must actively opt out of to avoid accepting them. They express concern about the power given to the WHO's director general during a pandemic, as they can decide what actions to take. The speakers also mention that the definition of a pandemic has been changed, potentially leading to a situation where even a small number of cases in different countries could be classified as a pandemic. This would allow the WHO to seize governing powers of member states.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is facing criticism for seeking to extend its powers and control over countries and people's self-determination. The WHO's reform process, initiated after the COVID-19 crisis, aims to bring significant changes that will affect all 194 member states. They are proposing a pandemic treaty that would give them authority over health decisions and the power to impose restrictions, lockdowns, and experimental treatments. Critics argue that the WHO has failed in the past and should not be granted more power. The treaty is set to be voted on in May 2024, and citizens are urged to pressure their political representatives to oppose it.

Latin American countries have reported outbreaks of a new infectious disease called severe epidemic enterovirus WFTR syndrome 2025. There have been 500 confirmed or suspected cases in the past six weeks. If containment and mitigation efforts fail, this virus could lead to a severe pandemic. The World Health Organization (WHO) is concerned about the global health and security risks associated with such a pandemic. Pandemics are complex and involve political, financial, and broader issues. National leadership is crucial, and the WHO should be involved in decision-making. Trust between countries, populations, healthcare systems, and governments needs to be rebuilt. The WHO needs to be strengthened and become a voice for the voiceless. Preparedness and training are key to successfully managing pandemics.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is facing criticism over its proposed pandemic treaty, which would grant the organization significant power over health decisions and impose restrictions on countries. The treaty would cover areas such as vaccines, medical devices, and experimental treatments. Supporters argue that it is necessary to protect the global population, while opponents fear a loss of sovereignty and individual liberties. The WHO's authority would extend to declaring recommendations and imposing restrictions, including lockdowns and surveillance. The treaty is set to be voted on by the 194 member states of the WHO in May 2024. Critics urge citizens to contact their politicians to voice their concerns and potentially stop the treaty.

In 1976, the US government urged everyone to get a swine flu shot to prevent a potential nationwide outbreak. 46 million people complied, but now 4,000 Americans are seeking $3.5 billion in damages from the government due to negative effects from the shot. Two-thirds of the claims are related to neurological damage or death. In 1918 and 1919, the same virus caused a pandemic that resulted in over half a million deaths in the US and 20 million deaths worldwide.

There are concerns about overstocking and the misuse of public funds in relation to vaccine orders. The speaker has been asking questions about this issue since October 2022. They mention that they, along with the ombudsman and the European prosecutor, are investigating these matters. The speaker emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability in managing the budget. They highlight that billions of euros have been spent on vaccine orders, but only a fraction of the doses have been administered. They also mention that Pfizer is suing countries like Poland and Hungary for wanting to reduce their orders. The speaker believes this is the beginning of a major scandal.

French journalists investigate the dangers and insufficient testing of medications on the market. The pharmaceutical lobby works hard in the political arena to quickly bring drugs to market. Doctors and pharmaceutical companies are forming closer ties. Shortly after, many parliamentarians from around the world call for vaccination against cervical cancer. The European Medicines Agency provides advice to the European Commission on whether a drug should be allowed in Europe.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is facing criticism over its proposed pandemic treaty, which would give it more power over global health decisions. The treaty would allow the WHO to impose restrictions, lockdowns, and experimental treatments without question. Some argue that this level of authority has never been seen before and raises concerns about individual liberties. Supporters argue that it is necessary to protect the world's population. The treaty is set to be voted on by the 194 member states of the WHO in May 2024. Critics are urging citizens to contact their politicians to voice their opposition and potentially stop the treaty from being ratified.