TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Entitlement spending, which makes up most of the federal budget, is a key area for potential cuts. This spending, amounting to roughly half a trillion dollars annually, acts as an incentive for illegal immigration, as it essentially pays people to come here. This influx is then leveraged to create new voters. The Democratic Party is concerned about efforts to curb illegal immigration because eliminating this financial draw would likely cause many to leave, resulting in a loss of potential voters for them.

Yale University researchers recently revealed that the number of illegal immigrants in the U.S. is over 22 million, not the previously cited 11 million. The Democratic Party is advocating for the legalization of all undocumented immigrants, which could result in 22 million new voters. Historically, most first-time immigrant voters lean Democratic. The largest margin in U.S. presidential history was 17 million votes in the 1984 election. Adding 22 million new voters could create a permanent Democratic electoral majority. This immigration debate is less about improving the country and more about securing long-term political power for the Democrats.

If 200,000 illegals are put into swing states, there is a high likelihood that they will vote for a particular party. It's only a matter of time before they become citizens, and those swing states will no longer be swing states. We risk becoming a permanent one-party, deep blue socialist state. This was the game plan, and it almost succeeded. If the opposing party had won, they would have legalized enough illegals in swing states to flip them to blue states. They would win the presidency, House, and Senate, make DC a state, maybe Puerto Rico, and pack the Supreme Court. Then, they would keep importing more illegals to cement that outcome, similar to what happened in California.

California has five more congressional representatives than it should because the state counts undocumented immigrants when determining congressional apportionment.

Julian Castro predicted that Texas would become a Democratic state due to demographic changes and population growth from outside the state. This statement went unchallenged, reflecting a broader acceptance of such views. In 2019, Donald Trump falsely claimed he would deport many illegal immigrants. Kamala Harris responded, emphasizing that this was an attempt to alter the country's demographics. However, illegal immigrants cannot vote and should not factor into demographic considerations. Harris's stance implies that these individuals are seen as potential Democratic voters, raising questions about the implications of her beliefs. This perspective is presented as morally superior, discouraging dissent and framing opposition as immoral.

If the Democrats win this election, they could legalize enough undocumented immigrants to shift swing states, making everywhere resemble California. This is a critical moment—our last chance. It's essential to push back and vote as if your life and future depend on it. This is it; we must act now.

California makes it difficult to complete large projects due to lengthy approval processes and frequent lawsuits. It can take at least two years to pass CEQA, and many people will sue. The Democratic party is controlled by unions and plaintiff's lawyers, especially those involved in class action suits. These lawyers write legislation that favors winning lawsuits in California because they fund the elections of the officials who get elected. This creates a cycle where elected officials write legislation to make it easy to win lawsuits and get large awards, because they were funded by Democrats and lawyers. The speaker believes there needs to be an above 0% chance of a Republican getting elected in California to avoid a one-party state.

The Democrat plan to entrench single-party rule involves flooding the country with millions of illegals to eclipse the populations of 36 states. The plan prioritizes non-citizens with free benefits to ensure loyalty to the Democrat party. Even when non-citizens commit violent crimes, they are kept in the country and critics are slandered as racist. Sanctuary laws act as population magnets, and non-cooperation with ICE is ensured. Non-citizens are counted in the census to determine congressional apportionment, potentially equaling 13 extra congressional districts. State voting laws are changed to legalize mass mail-in ballots with no signature verification or proof of citizenship requirements. Campaign promises of lavish benefits lock in a permanent voting majority, enshrining generational fealty to the Democrat party. This leads to winning elections and achieving entrenched single-party rule, funded by taxpayer dollars.

This election is a critical turning point, and it's why I've become politically active now. I believe that failing to elect Trump will result in the loss of democracy and the two-party system in the US. There are only a handful of swing states where the margin of victory is very small. The current administration is bringing large numbers of undocumented immigrants into these states. You can see the numbers on government websites. The increases in the number of illegals are enormous, in some cases up to 700%. If a state has a 10 or 20,000 vote margin and you add 200,000 illegals, it's no longer a swing state.

Yale University study suggests that the number of illegal aliens in the US is over 22 million, not 11 million. The Democratic party supports legalizing all illegal immigrants, potentially adding 22 million new voters. Historically, most first-time immigrant voters have voted Democrat. This could create a permanent electoral majority for Democrats. The focus of the immigration debate is not about improving the country or meeting labor needs, but about securing power for Democrats.

California makes it difficult to complete large projects due to lengthy approval processes and frequent lawsuits. It can take two years to pass CEQA, and many people will sue. California needs a crisis to achieve deregulation and delitigation. Unions and plaintiff's lawyers control the Democratic party, especially in California. Lawyers write legislation to make lawsuits easy to win because they fund the elections of officials. This creates a cycle where elected officials favor those who helped them get elected. There needs to be above a 0% chance of a Republican getting elected in California, otherwise it is a one-party state.

Speaker 1 believes that if Trump doesn't win the election, it will be the last election because Democrats are importing illegals via a secret CBP border app program. He claims this is illegal, but the DOJ isn't stopping it. According to Speaker 1, government websites show triple-digit increases in illegals in swing states, sometimes up to 700% over the last 3 years. He asserts that asylum seekers are fast-tracked to citizenship and vote Democrat, prioritizing bringing family to the US and being beholden to Democratic handouts. Speaker 1 predicts another four years of a Democratic administration will lead to legalizing enough illegals to eliminate swing states, turning the US into a single-party country like California, which became a super-majority Democrat state after the 1986 amnesty. He states California recently passed a law making voter ID illegal in any election.

The Democrat plan for open borders aims to bring in millions of illegal immigrants to secure a single-party rule. They prioritize noncitizens over Americans, protect criminals, and use sanctuary laws to keep them in the country. By counting noncitizens in the census and changing voting laws, they secure electoral power. Promising benefits ensures loyalty to the Democrat party, leading to permanent single-party rule, all funded by taxpayers.

Legal immigrants tend to lean Democrat, potentially impacting elections. The census counts all people, not just citizens, affecting House seats and electoral votes. Without counting illegal immigrants, blue states could lose 20 House seats and electoral votes. The Electoral College aims to balance power between smaller and larger states, contrary to the impact of illegal immigrants in blue states.

The chaos in Los Angeles is not organic or random, but a calculated move by the leftist ruling class to protect census-based political control. House seats and electoral votes are based on the number of people counted in a state, including illegal aliens. The influx of over 10,000,000 people across the border into blue states like New York and California is about math, not compassion. Mass deportations and people fleeing these blue states are threatening the math. For every 740,000 illegal aliens deported from a blue state, they lose one congressional seat in 2030. The DNC doesn't just lose votes, they lose control. Burning a city down like LA is a means to stop Trump. Media hysteria is used to stop deportations, and state-level obstruction protects population counts. Protests and riots are designed to bait the feds and flip the narrative. This is about control, power, and political survival, with the census as the real battlefield.

Yale University released a study suggesting that the number of illegal aliens in the US is not 11 million, but rather 22 million. The Democratic Party supports legalizing all illegal immigrants, granting them citizenship and voting rights. It is believed that the majority of first-time immigrant voters tend to vote Democrat. By adding 22 million new voters to the rolls, Democrats could potentially secure a permanent electoral majority. This is seen as a strategy to maintain power rather than improving the country or addressing labor needs.

In a healthy society, we would urgently question how a place like California became so unlivable that many residents chose to leave. This concern should extend to the entire United States to prevent similar situations elsewhere. The Democratic Party appears to be promoting this demographic shift, openly discussing the replacement of American voters with loyalists from other countries. They frequently express this idea, even in racial terms, without shame. A New York Times columnist explicitly stated that demographic changes would lead to Democratic control in states like Georgia, highlighting that this concept is not a right-wing conspiracy but rather a central focus of the modern Democratic Party, as it represents their strategy for gaining power.

Speaker 0: This all started because of redistricting in Texas, and this was Trump pushing Republican controlled states to throw out their current congressional maps so as to cook the books so that there is less likely for Democrats to retake control of the house during the next year midterms. Is it fair to argue that Republican Party is starting this? Speaker 1: No, Jake. There has been gerrymandering going on for two hundred years. There is such extreme gerrymandering going on that in a state like Massachusetts, it has 40% of the people voting for Trump. They only had they have zero representatives. The Republican party has zero representatives sent to the house. Think about that. In New Mexico, if 45% of people voted for Trump and vote Republican and zero is sent to the house, zero representative from the Republican party. So there's gerrymandering, crazy gerrymandering going on all over the country and we wanted to try to stop it in California and we did stop it in California and we went around the country. So I think this whole thing about finger pointing and said they did it, so therefore we should doing it. That's not really the way to go. The one party should outperform the other party. It should be performance. And when it comes to midterm elections as you know, always the party that is not in the White House usually wins by twenty, twenty five, 30 seats. So what does five seats matter in the first place in Texas? It is crazy. We should outperform them. That is where the action is.

The situation at the border is critical because it will fundamentally change the country. The core issue is who resides here, which directly impacts democracy and voting outcomes. Over the past 30 years, the U.S. population has increased by 100 million, a fact many Americans are unaware of. This demographic shift is seen as insufficient by those in power, leading to efforts to influence the electorate. By opening borders and granting citizenship and voting rights to newly admitted individuals, there is a clear intention to alter election results.

Democrats acknowledge the need for a secure border, but concerns arise over the movement of illegal immigrants to swing states. Some fear this could lead to a coordinated effort to provide these individuals with services and a pathway to citizenship, ultimately influencing voting patterns in favor of Democrats. Immigration remains a contentious issue, with historical insights suggesting that meaningful reform is unlikely due to its political utility. Past bipartisan efforts have failed, often due to opposition. The conversation highlights the significant impact of immigration on states like Texas, raising questions about the long-term implications for political dynamics in the U.S.

Recently, a discussion arose regarding how federal authorities allow illegal aliens to fly without ID, while American citizens face restrictions. This raises a critical voting rights issue: as new voters are imported, the political power of existing citizens is diluted. The focus should not be on race but on the impact of demographic changes on democracy. Democrats support mass immigration to gain electoral advantage, not out of compassion. Historical examples, like California's shift from Republican to Democratic dominance post-1986 immigration reforms, illustrate this trend. The influx of immigrants with differing political views has transformed states, undermining the political power of long-term residents. Ultimately, this strategy threatens the democratic principle of one person, one vote.

This election is a critical turning point for democracy in America. If Trump doesn't win, we risk losing the two-party system. Swing states, which have narrow margins of victory, are being flooded with illegal immigrants, drastically changing their voting dynamics. This strategy could lead to permanent Democratic control, eliminating competitive elections. For example, California has passed laws making it illegal to show ID when voting, raising concerns about election integrity. Most countries require ID to vote, and without it, election fraud becomes untraceable. If the Democrats win this election, they will legalize enough illegals to secure swing states, leading to a future where every election favors them, similar to California, with no escape for voters. This is our last chance to preserve democracy.

The Democrat plan for open borders aims to secure single-party rule by flooding the country with illegal immigrants, prioritizing their needs over American citizens, protecting criminals, and using sanctuary laws. They plan to count noncitizens in the census for more congressional power, change voting laws to benefit their party, and promise benefits to secure a permanent voting majority. Ultimately, this strategy leads to single-party rule funded by taxpayers.

The Democrat plan to entrench single-party rule involves flooding the country with millions of illegals to eclipse the populations of 36 states. The plan prioritizes non-citizens with free benefits to ensure loyalty to the Democrat party. Even when non-citizens commit violent crimes, the plan keeps them in the country and attacks the language used to describe the criminals. The plan ensures privileges via sanctuary laws and noncooperation with ICE. Counting non-citizens in the census would equal 13 extra congressional districts. The plan also includes lawfare campaigns to change state voting laws, legalizing mass mail-in ballots with no signature verification or proof of citizenship requirements. Campaign promises of lavish benefits aim to lock in a permanent voting majority, enshrining generational fealty to the Democrat party to win elections and achieve entrenched single-party rule. Tax dollars are allegedly paying for it.

Yale study suggests over 22 million illegal aliens in the US. Democrats push for their legalization, potentially adding 22 million new voters who tend to vote Democrat. This could secure a permanent electoral majority for Democrats. Immigration debate is about power, not improving the country or meeting labor needs.