TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Impact of childhood vaccination on short and long term chronic health outcomes in children, a birth cohort study. 18,468 subjects. The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis. Six hundred percent more acute and chronic ear infections. Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Five and a half times risk. Six hundred and sixteen percent increase. Learning issues, developmental delays, speech delays, language delays. Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero. There was zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities. This is devastating. This may be the most important study that has ever been done and it needs to be published.

Speaker describes a Henry Ford Medical Center study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children (2000–2016). Dr. Marcus Servis agreed to conduct it, recruiting a chief epidemiologist and two statisticians. Using medical records, the study followed about sixteen thousand vaccinated and two thousand unvaccinated children and aimed to show the CDC vaccine schedule is safe to reduce vaccine hesitancy. Findings showed higher rates in the vaccinated group for several conditions: four point two nine times asthma, three point zero three times atopic disease, five point nine six times autoimmune disease, and five point five three times neurodevelopmental disorders. ADHD: two hundred sixty cases in the vaccinated group, none in the unvaccinated. After ten years, seventeen percent of the unvaccinated had a chronic health issue versus fifty seven percent of the vaccinated. The study’s publication was blocked because its findings did not fit the belief and policy that vaccines are safe.

All vaccines, including COVID vaccines, are causing harm to children. There has never been a study comparing fully vaccinated kids following the CDC schedule to unvaccinated kids. The difference in health outcomes is dramatic, with unvaccinated kids being consistently healthier. A 10-year study by Dr. Paul Thomas, which was retracted unethically, showed that vaccinated kids were more likely to get the diseases they were vaccinated against. Being unvaccinated should be applauded because vaccines are causing chronic diseases in America. A study with over 1,000 unvaccinated people showed significantly better health outcomes compared to fully vaccinated individuals. The CDC promised to conduct a study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals but never followed through. No vaccine is safe or effective, and no study has proven otherwise.

Speaker 0 argues that to determine whether smoking causes lung cancer, you must compare smokers to non-smokers. They recount a sequence of flawed study designs that would falsely conclude no link: comparing two smokers with different consumption levels and finding the same cancer rates; comparing different cigarette brands among smokers and again finding no difference; comparing people in different towns who all smoke and finding no difference. The point is that all these comparisons fail because they do not include a non-smoker control group; thus they cannot establish causation. They then contrast this with vaccine studies, asserting that studies claiming vaccines don’t cause chronic diseases or autism do not compare vaccinated to unvaccinated children. Instead, such studies compare vaccinated children to other vaccinated children, with variations in vaccines received (e.g., MMR, DTaP, multiple vaccines in one visit) and with differing aluminum exposures (e.g., four milligrams vs two milligrams). They emphasize that these studies never examine the actual outcome of interest by comparing vaccinated against unvaccinated children. The speaker maintains that this flaw in vaccine studies mirrors the earlier tobacco example. The essential argument is that the only way to determine causation is to compare the exposure group (vaccinated children) to an appropriate control group (unvaccinated children). They reference the Henry Ford trial as an example of an unvaccinated-versus-vaccinated comparison, but note that no one has published or accessible data from it. They call for someone brave enough to conduct and publish a vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated study to settle the issue. Finally, they challenge proponents of vaccination to conduct such a study to prove their position, insisting that if vaccines are truly safe and non-causal for chronic diseases or autism, the study should be done and the data published to demonstrate that the claim is correct. The overall message is a insistence on direct, unambiguous vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated comparisons to establish causality, highlighting perceived gaps in current vaccine research and urging transparent data publication.

The speaker asks if there has been a study comparing the health outcomes of children following the CDC vaccination schedule and those who are unvaccinated. The other speaker says they are not aware of such a study and suggests it may be considered bad malpractice not to vaccinate a child. They discuss the possibility of a retrospective study using the Vaccine Safety Datalink, but note the need to control for confounders. The speaker presents an exhibit showing higher rates of health conditions in vaccinated children and suggests the need for larger studies to confirm or refute these findings. The other speaker agrees.

Speaker 0 expresses that publishing the material would effectively end his career. Speaker 1 questions what in the data could make the outcomes catastrophic for his career. Speaker 2 notes the study as a “bombshell.” The study included 18,468 subjects, of whom 1,957 were fully unvaccinated. When comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated groups, there was an increased risk of several chronic health conditions in the vaccinated group. Specifically, the vaccinated were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis, with an adjusted figure of 4.29 times (range 3.26 to 5.65 across analyses). Speaker 4 adds that the study also found a threefold increase in atopic diseases, which are a subset of allergic diseases. The researchers reported almost a sixfold risk for autoimmune disease, listing autoimmune conditions such as thrombocytopenic purpura, rheumatoid arthritis, SLE (systemic lupus erythematosus), multiple sclerosis, and Guillain–Barré syndrome. They note there are over 80 different autoimmune diseases, and the data showed a sixfold increase in autoimmunity among the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Speaker 3 highlights neurodevelopmental disorders, noting a five-and-a-half times increased risk. The discussion emphasizes that the immune system is intimately connected with brain development and functioning, suggesting that when the immune system is triggered by illness or vaccination, neuropsychiatric symptoms may arise due to brain inflammation and immune processes in the brain. Speaker 2 reports two point nine two times the amount of motor disabilities and four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated group versus the unvaccinated, along with a threefold rate of developmental delay. The data also show, consistent with allergy and autoimmunity findings, six times more acute and chronic ear infections in the vaccinated group. Speaker 3 notes that in several health conditions, analysis could not be performed because there were none in the unvaccinated group, and the methods required nonzero counts in both groups. For example, there were two hundred sixty-two children who had ADHD in the vaccinated group, while the unvaccinated group had zero cases of ADHD. The same pattern is described for other conditions: zero cases of brain dysfunction, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, ticks, and other psychological disabilities in the unvaccinated group.

Speaker 0 argues that a critical missing piece in autism research is vaccinated versus unvaccinated studies, and notes there are six good studies to rely on. They claim these studies have been systematically suppressed and ignored by the mainstream media and the medical establishment. The summary of specific study claims is as follows: - Two studies by Gallier and Goodman show that the birth dose of the hepatitis B vaccine significantly increases autism risk. - Three studies by Anthony Mawson confirmed that vaccination increases the odds of developing autism by at least 4.2-fold. - Preterm birth coupled with vaccination increases the odds of neurodevelopmental disability by more than 12-fold compared to preterm birth without vaccination. - A study by Hooker and Miller published in 2021 found that vaccination increases autism risk five-fold. - Vaccination in the absence of breastfeeding increases autism risk 12.5-fold. - Vaccination in addition to cesarean birth increases autism risk 18.7-fold. The speaker states that after conducting a systematic review of a thousand studies, their belief is that the autism and chronic disease epidemics are primarily caused by toxicants, mostly from vaccines and about a dozen additional toxicants.

The speaker claims epidemiological studies are easily manipulated and that proper studies comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated groups are lacking, except for a CDC study in 1999. This CDC study, led by Thomas Verstraten, allegedly compared children who received the hepatitis vaccine within the first thirty days of life to those vaccinated later or not at all. The speaker asserts the study found a 1,135% elevated risk of autism in vaccinated children, which "shocked" researchers. The speaker alleges the CDC then kept the study secret and manipulated it through five iterations to bury the link.

An outside expert analyzed data from 2,700 vaccinated and 560 unvaccinated patients in a medical practice. The study found that vaccinated patients had higher rates of asthma, allergic rhinitis, eczema, sinusitis, gastroenteritis, respiratory infections, otitis media, conjunctivitis, breathing issues, and behavioral issues like ADD and ADHD. The speaker claims that vaccines can shift the immune system towards allergy and autoimmunity, leading to more infections. The medical board responded by revoking the speaker's license. The speaker argues that the association between vaccines and health issues is not a coincidence, citing other studies and mechanisms of action like aluminum toxicity and immune activation from too many vaccines.

The speaker claims that this is not conspiracy theory and cites a BMJ publication by Retzaf Levy, which describes a process in vaccine development: vaccines were trialed under one formulation, but when the decision was made to deploy them globally, the process was changed and the product injected to the rest of the world. The speaker asserts that changing the process requires new trials, yet the EMA asked for an additional trial of 250 people after the process change, and that data was never delivered. This is described as a “bait and switch,” asserted as crucial for understanding why trial data is of zero consequence to what’s seen in the field, implying that real-world outcomes do not match trial data and that the numbers from trials are a caricature of field performance. The speaker claims Pfizer had early data indicating what would happen and acted on that by acquiring cancer companies: $43,000,000,000 into the acquisition of C Gen and $2,260,000,000 to acquire Trillium Therapeutics. Trillium is described as focused on blood cancers with the CD147 marker (CD Adaptor 147) on them, a marker claimed to be known to be involved in COVID. The implication is that Pfizer is building an investment portfolio in cancer companies that would benefit from the consequences the speaker alleges they caused. In summary, the vaccines on the market are said to be not the same formulation as what was tested in clinical trials, labeling this a “bait and switch” and a fraud, and asserting that vaccine effectiveness numbers are not reliable because the products differ from trial formulations and because those numbers decay over time. The speaker alleges significant DNA contamination, stating that 10 out of 11 studies have found this, with the remaining studies allegedly constrained by financial conflicts. The claim is that consensus among real studies supports DNA contamination, with several studies through peer review, which the speaker notes is difficult for those papers to pass through peer review. It is claimed that five peer-reviewed studies not originally examining contamination found DNA in blood and tissue upon sleuthing. The speaker asserts that cancer is on the rise and that several papers report cancer post-vaccination, including neoplasms at the site of injection. The claim is that this situation cannot be dismissed as coincidence and is described as “liability free” and often mandated. The speaker posits that this may be the largest carcinogenic hit to the human population, with vaccines on childhood schedules and given to pregnant women, stating that “this has gone absolutely off the rails.”

All vaccines, including COVID vaccines, are causing harm to children. There has never been a study comparing fully vaccinated kids following the CDC schedule to unvaccinated kids. The difference in health outcomes between these two groups is dramatic, with unvaccinated kids being consistently healthier. A 10-year study by Dr. Paul Thomas, which was retracted unethically, showed that vaccinated kids were more likely to get the diseases they were vaccinated against. A study by the control group with over 1,000 unvaccinated people also revealed significantly better health outcomes compared to fully vaccinated individuals. Despite promises, the CDC has never conducted a study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. No vaccine is safe or effective, and no study has been able to prove otherwise.

The speaker cites two population studies on COVID-19 vaccines and cancer risk, claiming they show massive increases in multiple cancers. The first study, from Italy, followed 300,000 Italians for about 30 months and reported about a 23 percent increased risk of overall cancer hospitalizations, with increases of about 40 to 60 percent in breast cancer hospitalizations, colorectal cancer, bladder cancer, and leukemia/lymphoma. A new study from South Korea, involving over eight million Koreans, purportedly corroborates the Italian data and expands on it. It reports about a 26 percent increase in overall cancer risk and increases across six major types of cancer, including gastric, thyroid, colorectal, and breast cancer, as well as other cancers described as very rare. The speaker frames these findings as an absolute disaster and claims they confirm that the vaccines have unleashed a turbo cancer epidemic. They state that the datasets corroborate these results and that the observed effects can be explained by gene expression chaos documented in other studies, along with genomic integration observed in stage four cancer patients. The speaker characterizes the situation as a disaster that needs immediate acknowledgment.

The speaker claims that the CDC commissioned six epidemiological studies using fraudulent techniques, instead of comparing health outcomes between fully vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. According to the speaker, a 1999 CDC study led by Thomas Verstraten compared children who received the hepatitis vaccine within their first thirty days of life to those vaccinated later or not at all. This study allegedly found a 1,135% elevated risk of autism among vaccinated children. The speaker states that the CDC kept the study secret and manipulated it to bury the link by removing older children and stratifying the data. The speaker asserts that over 100 external studies indicate a link between vaccines and autism.

"Chronic disease has gone from twelve point eight percent in our children in the nineteen eighties to over fifty four percent of our kids now." "72 times we are altering the immune system of our children with our vaccine program." "There'd be one easy study to rule it out, compare vaccinated children to completely unvaccinated children." "But we don't know because they've never done the study." "The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis." "Six hundred percent more acute and chronic ear infections." "Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated." "Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero. There was zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities."

The speaker hired an expert to analyze data from 2,700 variably vaccinated and 560 unvaccinated patients in their practice, age-matched for comparison. The speaker claims the data, available at doctorsandscience.com, reveals significant differences in health outcomes. According to the speaker's slides, unvaccinated children had lower rates of asthma, allergic rhinitis, eczema, sinusitis, gastroenteritis, respiratory infections, otitis media, conjunctivitis, other infections, breathing issues, and behavioral issues like ADD/ADHD. The speaker states there were no cases of ADD/ADHD in unvaccinated patients over 10 years. The speaker suggests vaccines shift the immune system towards allergy and autoimmunity, leading to more infections. The speaker argues that the association between vaccines and negative health outcomes is not coincidental, citing multiple studies and mechanisms of action, including aluminum and immune activation from too many vaccines too soon. The speaker states that the medical board revoked their license in response to this study.

"Impact of childhood vaccination on short and long term chronic health outcomes in children, a birth cohort study." "18,468 subjects." "The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis." "Six hundred percent" "more acute and chronic ear infections." "Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated." "Five and a half times risk. Six hundred and sixteen percent increase." "Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero. There was zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities." "None. It's a big difference." "This is devastating." "This paper should have been rushed to publication on an emergency basis." "We are systematically making kids sick, and not just a little bit sick, very sick." "This may be the most important study that has ever been done and it needs to be published." "He knows. If he puts his name on this, his career is over." "Zervos probably gonna lose his job over this." "This is an inconvenient study for the entire vaccine agenda."

- "Eighteen thousand four hundred and sixty eight subjects, one thousand nine hundred fifty seven of them were fully unvaccinated." - "When comparing the health outcomes of the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated, they found an increased risk in the vaccinated of several chronic health conditions." - "The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis." - "They found a almost six times risk for autoimmune disease." - "Five and a half times risk for neurodevelopmental disorders." - "Two point nine two times the amount of motor disabilities." - "We found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall two point five fold increase in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination."

The speaker analyzed office visits, stratifying patients by the number of vaccines received. The study included over 500 unvaccinated and over 3,700 vaccinated individuals. The data revealed that more vaccines correlated with worse health outcomes over a ten-and-a-half-year period. Specifically, the speaker claims that increased vaccination was associated with higher rates of infections, ADD/ADHD, neurodevelopmental issues, eczema, allergies, and anemia. According to the speaker, these negative correlations were observed when comparing vaccinated individuals to the unvaccinated group. The speaker states that within five days of the data being available online, the Oregon Medical Board suspended their license on December 3, 2020, citing them as a threat.

Impact of childhood vaccination on short and long term chronic health outcomes in children, a birth cohort study. 18,468 subjects. The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis. Six hundred percent more acute and chronic ear infections. Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Five and a half times risk. Six hundred and sixteen percent increase. Learning issues, developmental delays, speech delays, language delays. Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero. There was zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities. None. It's a big difference. This is devastating. This is an inconvenient study for the entire vaccine agenda. If he puts his name on this, his career is over.

Speaker 0 argues that getting the vaccine for pertussis (whooping cough) makes it more likely to contract the disease than if one does not get the vaccine, claiming it increases lifetime risk of pertussis multiple times. They state that the most damning evidence is the comparison of death risk: from pertussis, the death risk is “less than two million,” whereas from the vaccine, the death risk is “more than one in seventy six thousand.” They interpret this as “30 times more likely that the vaccine will kill you than the disease.” Based on this information, Speaker 0 states that they would not risk their baby’s life with a “dangerous product” and prefer natural approaches to immune protection. They claim there are things that can be done naturally to boost a child’s immune system so they can fight off any infection, not just pertussis, and not just whooping cough, but everything. They describe a preference for “natural immunity,” calling it the innate, god-given immunity and the bodies and immune systems as “beautiful, amazing” compared to relying on a product they describe as unsafe and lacking safety testing. In sum, Speaker 0 presents a comparison of disease risk versus vaccine risk, emphasizing that death from the vaccine is framed as significantly higher than death from the disease, and they advocate foregoing vaccination in favor of natural immunity.

Study: Impact of childhood vaccination on short and long term chronic health outcomes in children, a birth cohort study. 18,468 subjects. 'The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis.' 'Six hundred percent more acute and chronic ear infections.' 'Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated.' 'Five and a half times risk. Six hundred and sixteen percent increase.' 'Learning issues, developmental delays, speech delays, language delays.' 'Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero. There was zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities.' 'This is devastating.' 'This is an inconvenient study for the entire vaccine agenda.'

An expert conducted a study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated patients in a medical practice. The results showed that vaccinated children had higher rates of asthma, allergic rhinitis, eczema, sinusitis, gastroenteritis, respiratory infections, otitis media, conjunctivitis, breathing issues, and behavioral issues like ADD and ADHD. The speaker mentions that vaccines may shift the immune system towards allergy and autoimmunity, leading to more infections. The speaker also claims that the medical board revoked their license in response to this study. They argue that the association between vaccines and health issues is not a coincidence, citing other studies and explaining the mechanism of action involving aluminum.

"This study was based on actual medical records." "What these researchers found was that vaccinated children had four point two nine times the rate of asthma, three point zero three times the rate of atopic disease, five point nine six times the rate of autoimmune disease, and five point five three times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders, which included three point two eight times the rate of developmental delay, and four point four seven times the rate of speech disorder." "After ten years, seventeen percent of the unvaccinated children had a chronic health issue, while fifty seven percent of the vaccinated children had at least one chronic health issue." "The only real problem with this study and why it didn't get submitted for publication is that its findings did not fit the belief and policy that vaccines are safe." "We can protect children from infectious disease, and we can protect children from vaccine harms."

Speaker 0 argues that, when re-examining the data from the original study, the raw numbers reveal a different pattern than what the study’s modeling suggested. Specifically, they state that, in the raw proportions, every single one of the 22 chronic disease categories was proportionally higher in the vaccinated group. This includes cancer, which the study reportedly treated as a control condition and claimed there was no difference for. According to Speaker 0, the study’s use of cancer as a control is at odds with the raw data they observed. They claim that there was a difference in cancer outcomes, contrary to the study’s implication of no difference. They emphasize that, with rare outcomes, the modeling employed in the original analysis is not very reliable, and as a result, the study did not perform any basic proportional analysis. Speaker 0 states that when they performed a basic proportional analysis themselves, cancer was fifty-four percent higher in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated children. They mention that this result is “explained biologically” and assert that there is biological plausibility behind it. Key points: - Raw proportions show all 22 chronic disease categories higher in the vaccinated group, including cancer. - The original study used cancer as a control and claimed no difference, which Speaker 0 disputes based on the raw data. - Modeling for rare outcomes is described as not very reliable. - A basic proportional analysis by Speaker 0 indicates cancer is 54% higher in the vaccinated group versus the unvaccinated. - A biological explanation or plausibility is asserted for the observed cancer difference in the vaccinated group.

The speakers discuss the benefits of vaccines and the need to compare the number of children affected by vaccines versus those with adverse reactions. They mention the 99.7% survival rate of COVID-19 and the increase in chronic health issues among children. They suggest that vaccines may be a factor in the rise of these issues and call for further study. However, they clarify that they are not claiming vaccines cause these issues, but that it should be properly investigated. They also point out that the increase in chronic health issues does not necessarily mean vaccines have improved children's health. They emphasize the need for sufficient data before reaching conclusions.