TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

A magnetic wand that controls the brain was tested on the speaker. Psychiatrist Mark George made the speaker's thumb twitch by zapping a specific area of the brain. The speaker also experienced their toe being affected by the wand.

Smart dust, a concept developed by the military, could enable tracking of anything, including people. Originating from DARPA in the 1990s, this technology features the Mu chip from Hitachi, the smallest RFID system, which can be scattered like dust or embedded in paper. It operates without a battery and can monitor individuals internally and externally. These nanoparticles evade the immune system, remaining undetected in the body. With widespread computing and connectivity, combined with AI capabilities, it’s possible to understand and influence people in unprecedented ways. The transhumanism movement seeks to enhance human abilities through radical technological modifications.

DARPA foundries making their own molecules, peptides, amino chains. I was reading them, not comprehending. Is it transhumanism? regenerative medicine? In the second livestream, nanotechnology reproduces itself, grabs up the components of your body to do it, then after reproducing itself, creates its own neural networks, no different than your body does. It can give commands to itself, upgrading nodes and then creating its own AI internally on its own. "Every single one of you that thinks you need the five g, no. It's inside." Thus, "the foundries with DARPA ten years ago." Then: "PACS database, anybody with the DHS, the FBI, can click a button remotely." The speaker warns: "You jabbed people with nano that not only recreates itself, but makes its own neural nets and its own artificial intelligence that is specific to the human on the inside?" It's in the molecular communication routing. The talk warns this is about turning humans into something else, not arms into a fish flipper, referencing a 2020 military blog. "Our synergists know more, I think, I suspect, than your military does."

Nanobots made of Graphene oxide and hydrogel are being injected into our bodies, allowing us to become receivers and transmitters of signals. This technology, developed by DARPA, aims to control soldiers' minds by implanting them with Graphene Oxide. Scientific journals have documented this, and companies like brain neuroelectronics use Graphene Oxide to manipulate behavior through brain interface. This is the direction of transhumanism, which we must resist.

I can clone you by using your skin cells and an egg, but it's illegal. However, we can create mini organs from your cells to test drugs. In our lab, we grow mini brains from people with or without a predisposition to Alzheimer's. We can age these brains to 80 years old in just a few months, causing them to lose their electrical activity and develop dementia. By activating three embryonic genes, we can reverse the aging process, restoring electrical activity and eliminating Alzheimer's. We have successfully done this in mice, improving their memory and learning abilities.

It's a groundbreaking achievement that took 2 years and over 10,000 egg injections. Deleting a specific gene resulted in a significant decrease in glomeruli in the brain, which is crucial for processing sensory information and generating behavior.

They argue that centralization—big pharma, the FCC, and other captured agencies—drives a problem that includes tech giants like Motorola, Nokia, Apple, Meta, and Google. They claim that programs government-sponsored at Tulane Neurosurgery and Neurology, known as MK Ultra, taught that people could be controlled through light waves. They describe a progression from cutting monkeys’ heads and wiring their heads to study behavior to the claim that we are controlled by light waves, not just by light in our environment. They point out that blue light is used by Dell, Apple, Meta, Google, and others on screens, and question why efflux or iris isn’t preloaded, suggesting the reason is that blue light lowers dopamine and melatonin, making people addicted. They attribute the discovery of this effect to the mafia rather than the CIA, linking it to the Las Vegas model: a desert city with great light and casinos that used blue light and alcohol to lower patrons’ dopamine so they would spend more money. They claim the CIA then redirected researchers to explore how to control without wires, moving from direct brain wires to semiconductors and LEDs through light. They recount that silicon valley developments with semiconductors produced LEDs, and that the early work included Delgado, a PhD researcher who implanted wires in a bull’s head to stop the animal via remote control, demonstrating a transition to wireless control. They assert that the next step was to eliminate wires and implant microchips in the brain, akin to Neuralink, enabling electrical, photoelectrical, and wireless control. They claim that researchers discovered that light could be used to control mammals, and that Meta and Google codified this through patents for blue light technology used in screens, owning the patents via patent attorneys. They reference Maria Manoulas in Los Angeles and her circle of friends connected to screens, asking whether these tools have been used to influence people and situations around them. They argue digital babysitting is successful for parents because a child becomes easier to control with screens, comparing this to a heroin addict needing a fix, explaining that exposure to electromagnetic pollution reduces beta endorphin (the natural brain opiate) and drives a need for external dopamine from drugs, alcohol, sex, or food. They claim this entire line of research originated in covert work at institutions such as Tulane, Johns Hopkins, Mayo Clinic, and Harvard, then moved into big tech. They explain the transition from old CRT screens to blue-lit modern screens, noting that those who own the patents control the algorithms and centralize medicine for profit. They suggest a cynical view of doctors: their burnout is tied to blue-lit electronic medical records like Epic, Cerner, and Meditech, which require data input rather than patient interaction. They ask who that serves and imply it harms both patients and doctors. They challenge the idea that technology saves money, asserting instead that it increases data collection and profit through big data. They warn that AI will be used to train computers to replace dermatologists, predicting that in twenty years people will visit Walgreens and consult AI-generated, Google-algorithm-created centralized medicine. They name Maria Manoulas and her circle as part of this ecosystem.

Neuralink chip is not yet widely used, but the first patient, a quadriplegic, will soon be able to control their computer and phone with it. Another person who had a brain chip implanted can now walk and talk. The regulatory process for these chips is rigorous. The next version of the chip will allow users to control devices through their thoughts, like telepathy. There are plans to develop a chip that can restore vision to those who are blind. It may even enable people to see in multiple wavelengths, including ultraviolet, infrared, and radar. This technology could be called "Blindsight."

I visited an underground research facility on the Mexican American border where they are developing transdimensional medical technologies. These technologies can attach missing limbs to the subtle body and help with phantom pain. However, these same technologies could also provide free energy for homes. There are many other spin-offs in energy propulsion that could benefit humanity. I believe we need a Marshall plan for new energy and the environment, funded by individuals in an open source way. Expecting governments to support these disruptive technologies is unrealistic. We are running out of time due to the state of the biosphere and population growth. We need to take drastic measures to create change quickly.

Technology is advancing towards connecting the human brain directly to computers through implantable neural interfaces. DARPA's Neural Engineering System Design (NESD) program aims to refine this technology for finer control and faster communication. Concerns arise about potential weaponization and misuse of brain sciences for political and military purposes. Scientists envision a future where nanobots connect our brains to the cloud, creating a "brain net" that replaces the Internet. The use of nano materials for remote brain manipulation is discussed, raising ethical and security implications.

Speaker 0 explains that when you move your arm, your brain sends a signal to your muscles, and there is a nerve near the skin (the ulnar nerve) that innervates three fingers. The idea presented is to stimulate that nerve so that copying your brain signal sent to your hand makes your hand move when your brain tells it to move. In other words, this could cause someone to “take away your free will” and become your agent, removing control over the hand. The demonstration proceeds with locating the ulnar nerve and connecting it to a human-to-human interface. Sam is asked to squeeze his hand to provide a signal. The setup is described as feeling strange at first, similar to losing free will and having someone else act as your agent, so Sam is asked to relax his hand. Miguel is invited to participate. Sam squeezes again, and the device is connected so the signal can be simulated in the hand. Miguel is asked if he is ready; he says he is. The device is turned on, and Miguel’s hand begins to move in response to the brain signal. Sam is asked to squeeze again, and the response is repeated with a small, controlled movement. The presenter then demonstrates that both hands can be controlled: the brain is currently controlling both Miguel’s arm and Sam’s arm. Miguel is asked to relax his hand, and the question is posed: what happens if the presenter takes over control of Miguel’s hand? When Miguel relaxes, nothing happens because the brain must initiate the movement. Miguel then performs the action again, confirming the effect. The session concludes with gratitude to the participants. The presenter notes that this is happening worldwide in electrophysiology and proclaims a forthcoming “neuro revolution.”

All animals and humans have been implanted with Graphene Biochips for control and contact tracing. This includes connection to the Internet of humans and animals. The goal is to have complete control over the body and spirit. Despite the heavy topic, there is still hope to be found.

Humans are becoming cyborgs through devices like cochlear implants, artificial retinas, hearts, limbs, organs, and brain chips. Hundreds of thousands of people with defective brains currently have brain chips, which are being used to fix memory and other functions. DARPA is developing brain chips for super soldiers, and thanks to funding from people like Musk, direct machine-brain communication is being developed. This isn't a competition between humans and machines, but a merging of the two. Human evolution is now 10 million times faster than natural evolution.

The speaker asserts that all computer screens are blue-lit because the original technology emerged from a government program associated with Operation Paperclip. He says this program originated at Tulane Neurology and Tulane Neurosurgery in the mid-20th century, where the CIA conducted experiments on monkeys involving drilling into the skull, placing wires into the thalamus, and applying electricity to observe behavioral changes. One participant, Professor Delgado, reportedly proposed wireless control after seeing that wired devices could alter behavior. Delgado allegedly demonstrated wireless control in monkeys and bulls using RFID chips and semiconductors. The speaker claims the CIA then expanded the concept to light and screens, suggesting that electromagnetic radiation through screens can influence behavior, and asserts that this is why computer screens operate at certain frequencies. He connects this idea to a meeting arranged by a patent attorney who allegedly safeguarded the interests of Google and Meta to enable control over people’s activities. In a broader backstory, the speaker asserts that the original idea behind this development began with the CIA and traces it back to the Mafia in Las Vegas. He contends the Mafia wanted to build a new city in a desert, enclosed it, blacked out windows, and invented blue-lit slot machines. They supposedly discovered that money could be extracted more efficiently by offering free alcohol, which then inspired the CIA to initiate the program. The speaker emphasizes that this chain of events links Operation Paperclip, the CIA’s research, and modern tech platforms. He references Bobby Kennedy in connection with the topic, and notes his medical school background at LSU.

The speaker discusses an operation that aimed to incite conflict between the Hutu and Tutsi groups. However, things escalated quickly, leading to uncontrollable rage among the Hutu crowd. It is revealed that researchers discovered specific brainwaves that control our actions and emotions, such as rage, fear, and lethargy, back in the 1950s. The challenge at that time was transmitting these brainwaves accurately. With advancements in technology like transistors and microprocessors, the practical application of precise control brainwaves became possible.

Nanobots made of Graphene oxide and hydrogel are being injected into our bodies, allowing us to become receivers and transmitters of external signals. This technology, developed by DARPA, aims to control soldiers' minds by implanting them with Graphene Oxide. Scientific journals have documented this, and companies like brain neuroelectronics use Graphene Oxide to manipulate behavior by interfacing with the brain. This is the path towards transhumanism, which we must resist.

The brain is a learning system, and experiments with implants in monkey brains have shown success as both the brain and computer adapt to each other. They work together to understand how to perform tasks, like grabbing a banana with a robotic arm. Interface challenges may be easier to overcome than anticipated. However, developing effective tools for the body remains difficult due to the harsh environment created by immune cells that reject anything they don't recognize.

On March 16, 2018, DARPA announced an initiative to develop human-machine interfaces that connect the brain directly to external systems. This technology could enable users to control devices like drones through thought alone. While promising for civilian and military applications, concerns arise about potential misuse for mind control. DARPA has a history of exploring how machines can influence the brain, including past projects like Project Pandora, which investigated microwave radiation's effects on behavior. Current advancements may allow for remote control of human actions, raising ethical questions. Additionally, gene editing technologies like CRISPR could modify brain cells, paving the way for more permanent forms of mind control. The development of such technologies necessitates a collaborative approach between creators and ethicists to address potential implications.

DARPA announces a new initiative called next generation non-surgical neurotechnology, aiming to create direct brain interfaces. DARPA has a history of developing influential technologies like the Internet and self-driving cars. The new technology could involve sensors on the head or implanted in the brain, allowing direct interaction with communication, processing, and weapon systems. This could enable remote control of robots and drones by simply thinking. These machine interfaces have potential applications in both civilian and military settings. However, some people worry that DARPA could potentially use this technology for mind control, similar to the concerns surrounding the CIA.

A French paper describes training sleeping people and sampling their knowledge, including word recognition, without waking them. This raises questions about sampling information from brains outside of awareness, potentially bypassing the need for willing subjects in technologies like CAT scans. This could allow for examining guilty knowledge and brain recognition waveforms. Linking brains is further off, estimated at around five years, but DARPA's approval for 500 deep brain implants suggests it may happen sooner. Brain linking has already been achieved in rats, where a "hive" of linked rat brains solved problems faster than individual rats. The next step may involve linking people who have given permission.