TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

People are finally starting to see the evidence against vaccines, with new studies linking boosters to cancer. Most MPs are still supporting vaccines, but only to save face until after the upcoming election. The speaker believes the vaccine rollout is a crime against humanity, with potentially millions of deaths worldwide.

We're seeing a surge in aggressive cancers, appearing at advanced stages, a phenomenon unlike anything seen before. Doctors are noticing a correlation between these cancers—breast, ovarian, pancreatic, colorectal, and prostate—and increased lipid peroxidation, seemingly linked to vaccinations. This isn't explained by delayed diagnosis or treatment. For example, a previously healthy 28-year-old male died five days after his second Pfizer vaccine; his heart was described as "mushy." This, among other cases, highlights the vaccine's danger. The lack of media coverage is alarming; this isn't just a medical crisis, but a crisis of science and democracy. I believe this vaccine should never have been authorized for mass use.

The speaker discusses how the spike protein in vaccines can lead to clotting issues, immune suppression, and reactivation of latent viruses like mono. This can also weaken the body's ability to fight off other viruses and cancers. An increase in cancer cases post-vaccination is noted anecdotally. The speaker attributes these effects to the spike protein in the vaccines.

The speaker claims mRNA injections have caused a "catastrophic" level of damage, citing excess deaths, permanent disabilities, and injuries. Worldwide deaths are estimated at around 17 million as of September 2023. In America, estimations for the first year of mRNA injection deaths range between 480,000 and 600,000, based on extrapolations from a recent preprint and VAERS data. The speaker asserts the shots are cardiotoxic and neurotoxic, linking them to myocarditis, cardiac arrests, coronary artery disease, and 86 neuropsychiatric adverse events. Vaccine spike protein has allegedly been found in the brains of stroke patients 17 months post-vaccination. The speaker states the shots induce blood clotting and damage the kidneys and gastrointestinal system. Furthermore, the speaker believes the shots are carcinogenic, with over 100 studies indicating 17 distinct mechanisms by which they may cause cancer.

The speaker claims SV40 in literature turns on cancer genes. They further claim the spike protein impairs tumor suppressor systems P53 and BRCA, promoting cancer and inhibiting the ability to fight it. The speaker suggests cancer rates are up, and the question is how much is due to vaccines. They state that repeated shots every six months increase the chances of getting loaded with synthetic genetic material that will cause harm, including heart disease, neurologic disease, blood clotting, immunologic problems, and cancer.

The speaker claims that this is not conspiracy theory and cites a BMJ publication by Retzaf Levy, which describes a process in vaccine development: vaccines were trialed under one formulation, but when the decision was made to deploy them globally, the process was changed and the product injected to the rest of the world. The speaker asserts that changing the process requires new trials, yet the EMA asked for an additional trial of 250 people after the process change, and that data was never delivered. This is described as a “bait and switch,” asserted as crucial for understanding why trial data is of zero consequence to what’s seen in the field, implying that real-world outcomes do not match trial data and that the numbers from trials are a caricature of field performance. The speaker claims Pfizer had early data indicating what would happen and acted on that by acquiring cancer companies: $43,000,000,000 into the acquisition of C Gen and $2,260,000,000 to acquire Trillium Therapeutics. Trillium is described as focused on blood cancers with the CD147 marker (CD Adaptor 147) on them, a marker claimed to be known to be involved in COVID. The implication is that Pfizer is building an investment portfolio in cancer companies that would benefit from the consequences the speaker alleges they caused. In summary, the vaccines on the market are said to be not the same formulation as what was tested in clinical trials, labeling this a “bait and switch” and a fraud, and asserting that vaccine effectiveness numbers are not reliable because the products differ from trial formulations and because those numbers decay over time. The speaker alleges significant DNA contamination, stating that 10 out of 11 studies have found this, with the remaining studies allegedly constrained by financial conflicts. The claim is that consensus among real studies supports DNA contamination, with several studies through peer review, which the speaker notes is difficult for those papers to pass through peer review. It is claimed that five peer-reviewed studies not originally examining contamination found DNA in blood and tissue upon sleuthing. The speaker asserts that cancer is on the rise and that several papers report cancer post-vaccination, including neoplasms at the site of injection. The claim is that this situation cannot be dismissed as coincidence and is described as “liability free” and often mandated. The speaker posits that this may be the largest carcinogenic hit to the human population, with vaccines on childhood schedules and given to pregnant women, stating that “this has gone absolutely off the rails.”

The speaker claims messenger RNA vaccines with the spike protein can induce cancer in multiple ways. They allege the presence of oncogene stimulants, specifically SV40 in the Pfizer vaccine, confirmed by multiple researchers. A paper from Wurzburg purportedly confirms this and shows the vaccines convert cells to cancer. The speaker asserts the spike protein and mRNA vaccines bind to major suppressor genes like P53, BRCA, and MSH, which normally suppress cancer. Mutations in these genes can lead to earlier onset of cancer. The speaker suggests these vaccines could cause the equivalent of mutations in these genes, leading to an explosion of colorectal cancers. They advocate for an immediate ban on these vaccines and accountability for those who oppose it.

The speaker cites two population studies on COVID-19 vaccines and cancer risk, claiming they show massive increases in multiple cancers. The first study, from Italy, followed 300,000 Italians for about 30 months and reported about a 23 percent increased risk of overall cancer hospitalizations, with increases of about 40 to 60 percent in breast cancer hospitalizations, colorectal cancer, bladder cancer, and leukemia/lymphoma. A new study from South Korea, involving over eight million Koreans, purportedly corroborates the Italian data and expands on it. It reports about a 26 percent increase in overall cancer risk and increases across six major types of cancer, including gastric, thyroid, colorectal, and breast cancer, as well as other cancers described as very rare. The speaker frames these findings as an absolute disaster and claims they confirm that the vaccines have unleashed a turbo cancer epidemic. They state that the datasets corroborate these results and that the observed effects can be explained by gene expression chaos documented in other studies, along with genomic integration observed in stage four cancer patients. The speaker characterizes the situation as a disaster that needs immediate acknowledgment.

A Swedish physician and researcher, Dr. Jutta Kruger, claims that COVID-19 vaccines are linked to fast-growing cancers. She has observed extraordinary rates of aggressive cancers in her pathology work and believes the vaccines are triggering them. Official US government data allegedly shows a shocking 143,233% increase in the risk of developing cancer after COVID-19 vaccination. The speakers express concerns about various systems being rigged, including the banking industry, weapons manufacturers, mainstream media, and the government. They argue that control over information and opinions is increasing, comparing it to communist countries where dissent is suppressed through incarceration or execution. They mention California as an example where opposing views could lead to arrest.

- "Turbo cancer was framed by mainstream media as being basically a myth, but it's not anymore." - "Now it is in the scientific peer reviewed literature, an entire manuscript dedicated on COVID nineteen vaccine induced turbo cancer." - "Unusually aggressive cancers that kind of just like they start with a small tumor, they get the shot, and then they have like 50 tumors or this single tumor grows into a large mass and then they end up dying shortly thereafter." - "So these turbo cancers are usually seen in young individuals as outlined in that study." - "You don't see these cancers in these young individuals and there's so many different mechanisms biologically that the protein does indeed induce cancer." - "One is hyper inflammation makes the body primed for cancerous growths." - "One is genetic dysregulation, gene expression chaos." - "And another one is it literally suppresses tumor suppressor genes, p53 and BRCA, BRCA."

The speaker alleges that after receiving FDA Emergency Use Authorization for a vaccine produced via "process one," manufacturers switched to "process two." This new process allegedly introduced contaminants, including foreign DNA and SV40, a cancer-causing substance. The speaker connects this alleged change to a reported increase in aggressive cancers, particularly among young people. Referencing an NIH paper, the speaker claims SV40 is a known oncogenic DNA virus that induces cancers in laboratory animals. The speaker asserts Pfizer knew they were putting a carcinogen in process two. They speculate that this is the reason Pfizer redacted 800 pages of the manufacturing process, citing trade secrets.

The speaker, an oncologist, expresses concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines and boosters. They believe that the spike protein in the vaccines has harmful effects due to its charge and similarity to human epitopes. They argue that the boosters are unnecessary and can suppress the T cell response, leading to cancer relapses and other health issues. The speaker criticizes the medical community for ignoring their concerns and calls for a ban on mRNA vaccines and boosters. They also mention the contamination of DNA in the vaccines and its potential impact on increasing cancer rates. The speaker emphasizes the need for government action to address these issues.

The speaker discusses government censorship and coercion in response to vaccine safety concerns. They recommend banning mRNA vaccines and boosters due to potential cancer risks. They also mention DNA contamination in vaccines and its impact on cancer rates. The conversation highlights concerns about accelerated aging and tumor growth linked to vaccine boosters. The speaker emphasizes the need for transparency and quality control in vaccine production.

People are starting to see the evidence against vaccines, with a recent study in Japan linking boosters to cancer. Most MPs are deeply invested in supporting vaccines, despite the risks. The speaker was ousted for speaking out against the vaccine rollout, comparing it to a crime against humanity. They believe millions of people have died due to experimental vaccines.

The speaker claims COVID vaccines are not actually vaccines and have caused unbelievable problems and damage. They allege the virus escaped from a lab with six manipulated inserts and the vaccine was 80% homologous to humans, causing major side effects. The speaker states that governments were informed but ignored warnings. They further claim the vaccines' quality control was appalling, the manufacturing process changed, and they were full of contaminants that can integrate into the genome, leading to massive excess deaths and a rise in cancer. The speaker questions why the vaccines haven't been banned, given COVID's diminished threat. They criticize the vaccination of children and call the vaccines "horrible gene therapies" causing "turbo cancers." They advocate for trials for those involved and accuse medical officers and regulatory bodies like MHRA, TGA, and FDA of incompetence and negligence, likening the situation to the Nuremberg trials. They assert the vaccines were never effective or safe, citing Pfizer's initial submissions to the FDA.

The speaker claims to have identified 13 mechanisms by which mRNA vaccines can induce or promote cancer, asserting that even one is sufficient to warrant an immediate ban. They attribute the rise of "turbo cancers" in young people to the vaccines, despite media outlets citing diet or environmental factors. The speaker alleges government censorship prevents open discussion about vaccine risks, with editors and producers reportedly considering it a crime to undermine public confidence in them. They state the vaccines are ineffective and dangerous, with benefits existing only in statistical models. They criticize COVID modeling for being consistently inaccurate and exaggerating the severity of the pandemic. The speaker highlights a Mail on Sunday article where they and James Royal argued that the vaccines cause cancer, citing relapsed cancers and new stage four cancers in healthy individuals. They conducted a survey revealing that they were the only doctor asking patients about their vaccine history, while other doctors deny any association between the vaccines and cancer.

"you were two to four times more likely to suffer serious harm from taking the COVID vaccine than you were to be hospitalized with COVID." "what is more better described as a gene therapy than as a vaccine." "$500,000,000 worth of investments in the mRNA technology for vaccines." "mega analysis of all the data." "Hundreds of studies, peer reviewed studies showing the harms of the mRNA vaccine." "the side effects of this gene therapy was so enormous and progressive, it was difficult to fathom." "The millions of molecules of mRNA entering the cell is creating biochemical havoc." "It's disrupting protein metabolism." "It's interfering with tumor suppressor genes." "In other words, it may be a risk factor for cancer." "it's highly likely that the COVID vaccines have been a factor, a significant factor in the cancer of members of the royal family."

The speaker discusses the presence of contamination in vaccines, specifically cDNA fragments and s p 40, which is a cancer-promoting segment of DNA. They mention that s v 40, a related virus, caused cancer in millions of Americans in the past. The speaker explains that s p 40 turns on cancer genes and that the spike protein in the vaccines impairs tumor suppressor systems. They conclude that the vaccines promote cancer and hinder our ability to fight it. The speaker acknowledges that cancer rates are increasing but questions how much of it is due to the vaccines.

Speaker decries the use of vaccines and mandates, questioning why it was done. They claim, "these vaccines were not vaccines" and that "the messenger RNA vaccines of Pfizer and Moderna" caused "unbelievable problems and damage to people," and were "pushed into this" by Pfizer and Moderna. They state, "These were not vaccines. These were horrible gene therapies that could actually integrate into your genome," linking to a rise in "turbo cancers." They urge others to "stand up to trial, defend themselves, and go to court" and call it "Nuremberg trial stuff," alleging "incompetence" and "negligence," that "they were never ever effective" and that there was "no evidence that they were effective whatsoever" and "they were never ever safe."

As a vaccine researcher, the speaker opposed COVID boosters from the start, based on the principle that vaccines shouldn't require them. Boosters were given because antibody levels fell off, which the speaker says is normal. The speaker claims the booster was a waste of time because it targeted a virus that no longer existed. The speaker alleges the booster suppressed the T cell system and switched antibodies to be tolerizing, increasing the risk of COVID and other infections. The speaker claims to have observed cancer patients relapsing after boosters, despite advising against them. The speaker says they were silenced for raising concerns, but now "everybody knows the truth" that these observations were correct. The speaker cites a Japanese study correlating increased cancer incidence with the vaccine program and expresses alarm that the study was based on deaths. The speaker says data from around the world shows how boosters can suppress immune response and drive cancers. The speaker concludes by lamenting that clinicians and scientists were silenced and unable to make a difference.

The speaker believes vaccines are causing cancer, with the risk increasing exponentially with each booster, because boosters suppress T cell response, which controls cancer. Experts claim messenger RNA is safe because we are exposed to it daily and it's easily disposed of, but the speaker argues that mRNA vaccines are stabilized to prevent disposal, which is the core problem. The speaker claims that mRNA can integrate and hack your genetic code, promoting oncogenes and down-regulating suppressor genes. They state that the UK and Australia have invested heavily in mRNA technology without proper oversight. The speaker advocates for ending this culture and improving population health.

The speaker states they are still being persecuted for raising concerns about harm from vaccines. They testified at the National Citizens Inquiry in Edmonton about vaccinated kids now getting cancer, which they believe will be denied for years despite seeing it in their patients. They claim to have discussed the "died suddenly" phenomenon and "turbo cancer" – aggressive cancers developing after COVID-19 vaccines – for two years, resulting in being banned from Twitter. The speaker says they have shifted focus to solutions and treating vaccine injuries, as the destructiveness of the "jabs" is now widely understood, with many knowing someone who has experienced heart attacks, strokes, blood clots, autoimmune diseases, neurological issues, or cancer. They claim there has been a huge explosion of cancer, and they are currently running the largest ivermectin cancer clinic in the world with over a thousand patients.

Traveling the country, the speaker has heard anecdotes from physicians about unusual cancer cases following the rollout of boosters. In Florida, one physician reported seeing five kidney cancers in young patients in one month, whereas they usually see one per decade. A chief of oncology reported seeing five astrocytoma brain cancers in young patients after the booster rollout, when they usually see one per year. Another physician reported their 21-year-old son developed salivary gland cancer after getting a booster. The speaker claims these are not normal cancers, and they've heard of patients with stable cancer or who have been cancer-free for years developing stage four disease after getting vaccinated. Doctors in France and the UK have allegedly confirmed similar observations, and a family doctor from Ireland reported seeing the "weirdest cancers" after the shot rollout. The speaker concludes that these anecdotes suggest something is wrong.

The speaker expresses frustration that COVID vaccines are still recommended for those most likely to be injured by them. They claim Vinay Prasad, now at the FDA, attacked them on ivermectin, stating it doesn't work and that "turbo cancer" is not a thing. The speaker believes there is denial regarding the mRNA technology and its potential link to aggressive cancers, as well as ivermectin's potential as a solution. They suggest that admitting the mRNA vaccines may be causing cancer and that ivermectin may be a solution could force the shutdown of the mRNA technology. The speaker claims there are numerous publications suggesting the vaccines may be causing aggressive "turbo cancers." They state the new Trump administration doesn't want to abandon the mRNA technology, complicating the use of ivermectin, fenbendazole, and benzoyl in cancer treatment due to a lack of support.

The speaker explains that the messenger RNA in the shots is contaminated with cDNA, including a cancer-promoting segment called s v 40. They mention that s v 40 turns on cancer genes in the human body and that the spike protein in the shots impairs tumor suppressor systems. The speaker suggests that the shots promote cancer through s v 40 and inhibit our ability to fight cancer. They also mention that cancer rates are increasing. The speaker raises the question of how much of this is due to the vaccines.