reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A bombshell report reveals the Pentagon controlled the COVID-19 program, using shady approval authorizations to shield big pharma from liability. Documents show lack of compliance with good manufacturing practices and deception in clinical trials. The National Security Council treated COVID as an act of war, coordinating with various agencies to keep information secret. The Pentagon ordered countermeasure prototypes, not vaccines, without informed consent. The Biden administration censored lab leak theories. A secret Pandemic Enterprise was formed in 2013 to plan responses. The public was misled about the safety and testing of the injections.

The speaker discusses the layers of liability protection surrounding COVID-19 vaccines and questions why they are necessary if the vaccines are safe and effective. They mention a case against EcoHealth Alliance for allegedly creating the virus in a Wuhan lab with the help of the DOD and CIA. The speaker presents evidence, including military medical records, suggesting that COVID-19 may have been developed years before its official timeline. They also mention Pfizer documents discussing shedding and a study protocol related to gene therapy. The speaker emphasizes the need for further investigation into the involvement of the DOD and CIA and presents their evidence for consideration.

A bombshell report reveals that the Department of Defense controlled the COVID-19 program from the beginning, using shady approval authorizations to shield big pharma from liability. The Pentagon used laws like the PrEP Act, Emergency Use Authorization, and Other Transaction Authority to protect pharmaceutical companies. Documents obtained by a former executive show that the vaccines were not compliant with good manufacturing practices, with extreme variability in adverse events. Clinical trials were deceptive, with subjects and investigators kept in the dark. The National Security Council treated COVID as an act of war, while telling the public it was a health event. The Pentagon's influence extends to multiple agencies, with a secret Pandemic Enterprise formed in 2013. The countermeasures used are prototypes, not fully tested vaccines.

A bombshell report reveals that the Department of Defense controlled the COVID-19 program from the start, using shady approval authorizations to shield big pharma from liability. The Pentagon employed laws like the PrEP Act, Emergency Use Authorization, and Other Transaction Authority to protect pharmaceutical companies and avoid proper clinical trials. Documents obtained by a former pharmaceutical executive, Sasha Lydipova, confirm that the vaccines were not good manufacturing practice compliant, with extreme variability in adverse events. The Pentagon's involvement stems from treating COVID-19 as an act of war, with the National Security Council setting policy. The deception extends to censoring lab leak theories and coordinating efforts across multiple agencies. The public was misled about the nature of the vaccines, which were actually prototypes and not subject to proper testing.

The top agencies leading Operation Warp Speed were the NSA and the Pentagon, not public health agencies like HHS, CDC, or NIH. The vaccines were developed by NIH and manufactured by military tractors, with Pfizer and Moderna being paid to put their names on them. The speaker believes that Operation Warp Speed is not new, as it has been happening since 1980 at Fort Detrick, a bioweapons lab. They claim that the government has been involved in unethical practices, such as injecting the military with HIV in the 1990s.

The Department of Defense used shady contracting practices and laws to shield pharmaceutical companies from conducting proper clinical trials. They manipulated public perception with the help of mainstream media. The clinical trials were just a theatrical performance and not required by law. Human subjects were deceived, including a 13-year-old girl who experienced adverse events. The Vaccine Safety Council had an ad featuring her, but it was pulled from airing during the Super Bowl. Most clinical trial sites, investigators, and FDA employees were also deceived, as only a few top officials were aware of the scam.

The speaker claims the DOD distributed COVID-19 vaccines and required absolute immunity, making it difficult to sue for damages without proving intentionality. They have a potential RICO claim, but litigation costs are prohibitive. They question why liability shields are needed if the vaccines are safe and effective. The speaker alleges EcoHealth Alliance and the CCP created SARS-CoV-2 in a Wuhan lab with the DOD or CIA's knowledge. They cite a study showing a 12 nucleotide sequence in a Moderna patent matching SARS-CoV-2, suggesting the disease was developed in the mid-2010s. The speaker presents military medical records showing a soldier receiving COVID-19 immunizations by Moderna in 2014, raising questions about the true history of COVID-19 and Operation Warp Speed. They claim the DOD and CIA were involved and asks to what extent and for how long. They also state they can show Pfizer documents discussing shedding and a study protocol based on oncolytic gene products for gene therapy shedding.

A bombshell report reveals that the Department of Defense controlled the COVID-19 program from the beginning, using shady approval authorizations to shield big pharma from liability. The Pentagon used laws like the PrEP Act, Emergency Use Authorization, and Other Transaction Authority to protect pharmaceutical companies and avoid proper clinical trials. Clinical trial subjects and investigators were deceived, and informed consent was not required. The National Security Council treated COVID-19 as an act of war, while telling the public it was a health event. The Pentagon's influence extended to agencies like the FDA and NIH. A secret Cabal called the Pandemic Enterprise was formed in 2013 to discuss countermeasures with strict confidentiality. The so-called vaccines were actually prototypes ordered by the Department of Defense, and people were not informed of this. Safety testing and animal trials were skipped, violating regulations.

The speaker discusses the layers of liability protection surrounding COVID-19 vaccines and questions why they are necessary if the vaccines are safe and effective. They mention a case against EcoHealth Alliance for allegedly creating the virus in a Wuhan lab with the help of the DOD and CIA. The speaker presents evidence, including military medical records, suggesting that COVID-19 may have been developed years before its official timeline. They also mention Pfizer documents discussing shedding and a study protocol related to gene therapy. The speaker emphasizes the need for further investigation into the involvement of the DOD and CIA and presents their evidence without drawing conclusions.

The speaker claims the DOD distributed COVID-19 vaccines and required absolute immunity, making the DOD the target for lawsuits, which would be difficult to win without the data they are hiding. They believe EcoHealth Alliance created SARS CoV-2 in the Wuhan lab with the DOD or CIA's approval, transferring the necessary technology to the CCP. A study showed a 12 nucleotide sequence in a Moderna patent from 2016 perfectly matched SARS CoV-2, suggesting the disease was developed in the mid-2010s. The speaker presents military medical records showing a soldier receiving COVID-19 immunizations by Moderna in 2014, suggesting the need to investigate the real history of COVID. They also claim to have Pfizer documents discussing shedding and a Komunardi approval agreeing to a study based on oncolytic gene products for gene therapy shedding.

The vaccines were not developed by Moderna and Pfizer, but by the NIH, which owns 50% of the patents. Furthermore, the vaccines were not manufactured by Pfizer or Moderna, but by military contractors. Pfizer and Moderna were allegedly paid to put their stamps on the vaccines as if they came from the pharmaceutical industry, but it was supposedly a military project.

The speaker discusses how the pandemic was used to assert control, profit the pharmaceutical industry, and introduce surveillance measures. They highlight the involvement of intelligence agencies and the military in the pandemic response, with the NSA and Pentagon leading Operation Warp Speed. The speaker claims that the vaccines were developed by NIH and manufactured by military contractors, not by Moderna and Pfizer. They also mention multiple simulations of coronavirus outbreaks sponsored by the CIA over the years. The speaker questions the origins of the virus and the involvement of the Chinese CDC and CIA in suppressing the lab leak theory. They connect the history of bioweapons research to the CIA and Pentagon's interest in gain-of-function research.

The discussion centers on a Dutch civil litigation in which Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, and Marc Rutemp (Marc Rutza) are named as individual defendants in cases linked to “Project COVID” and broad pandemic preparedness efforts years before the 2020 pandemic. Key facts asserted: - The defendants are plaintiffs in civil tort litigation filed in the Netherlands around 2023. Two cases exist: an older 2023 case and a second case involving additional plaintiffs. The Dutch approach allows individuals to be named as defendants in civil tort actions. - Gates and Bourla (and Rutza) have appeared as defendants; Gates attempted to avoid jurisdiction, but the Amsterdam court ruled that Gates and Bourla, as individuals, respond to the case. They have not appeared in court personally, but their lawyers appear on their behalf. - On March 9, an appeal hearing occurred in Amsterdam at the Court of Appeals, with extensive public attendance (about 60 journalists, podcasters, and plaintiffs). The hearing was described as explosive; a single attorney, Peter Stassen, presented a long argument as co-counsel had been imprisoned and disbarred, leaving one attorney on a tight budget. A video of the proceedings and a standout speech went viral. - The plaintiffs allege the defendants conspired to create “Project COVID” and a “pandemic preparedness racket” years prior to 2020. The core claim is that Gates, Bourla, Rutza, along with others, collaborated with private NGOs, the military, NATO, and DOD through a DARPA-linked pandemic program to identify pandemic potential viruses and to develop vaccines and therapeutics within sixty days, with funding from the DOD. - Evidence cited includes a 2017 AstraZeneca tape in which a key AstraZeneca executive states that DARPA approached them in 2017 to join a consortium to identify pandemic viruses and deliver vaccines within sixty days; the response was, “I thought it was science fiction.” The tape is part of an evidence package showing pre-2020 planning. - February 4, 2020 is highlighted as a crucial date: a telephone call from DARPA indicating COVID was declared a national security threat, followed by retroactive emergency declarations around March 2020. A February 4, 2020 conference was scheduled, with widespread communications among government, military, HHS, and CDC; the aim was to secure liability protection for pharmaceutical countermeasures during a declared emergency. - The defense includes the assertion that the public-private partnership extended to many companies (including 300 others) that joined the consortium, with U.S. and European regulatory synchronization through mutual recognition agreements. - The alleged motives are primarily framed as profits and control, with references to a long-standing history of military involvement in vaccine development and public health measures, including the PREP Act in the U.S. and parallel European countermeasures frameworks that waive liability and regulatory requirements during declared emergencies. The PREP Act’s role — especially in the U.S. — is discussed as shielding manufacturers from liability, with European frameworks described as allowing similar protections through contracts and synchronized countermeasures legislation. - Expert testimonies: five experts have provided evidence supporting foreknowledge and intentional deception by government health officials and the named defendants. Sasha Ladopova and Catherine Watt contributed written testimonies; Ladopova references foreknowledge by health regulators, and the broader regulatory harmonization across EMA and FDA. - Francis Boyle, a professor known for work on bioweapons law, testified that the vaccines/metas could be viewed as bioweapons; he died three weeks after agreeing to testify. - Injuries to plaintiffs: in the initial case, seven injured plaintiffs with one death; the second case added three more plaintiffs. Injuries cited include cardiovascular inflammation, autoimmune conditions, and cancer; plaintiffs contend their lives were destroyed by the countermeasures, while regulators and manufacturers allegedly denied injuries and deaths. What happens next: - An October 22 hearing in the lower court in Lewarden (The Netherlands) is planned, with a public in-person event and a press conference. - The appeal on the second case seeks to have expert witnesses heard under oath; the prior lower court denied this, and the higher court’s decision is anticipated (with expectations of denial, according to the interview). - The campaign invites public interest and financial support; the foundation in the Netherlands funds the case, and the English-language YouTube channel is available for updates and evidence. Contact points for following the case include Sasha Ladopova’s Substack and the Dutch foundation’s YouTube channel and materials.

At the outset, a process was approved by the FDA for emergency use authorization. However, it was later discovered that the approved process was swapped out for one containing contaminants like DNA and a cancer-causing substance. Pfizer redacted 800 pages of the manufacturing process, hiding the fact that a carcinogen was included. This lack of transparency led to no informed consent and potential harm to individuals. The vaccine rollout included a trial with a 2.4 times higher adverse event rate, including the presence of a carcinogen.

Speaker 0 contends that the top organization that managed Operation Warp Speed and the pandemic was not a public health agency but the NSA, a spy agency, with the Pentagon as the second agency. He asserts that vaccines were developed not by Moderna and Pfizer, but by NIH, whose patents are owned 50% by NIH, and that vaccines were manufactured not by Pfizer or Moderna but by military contractors. He claims Pfizer and Moderna were paid to put their stamps on those vaccines as if they came from the pharmaceutical industry. Speaker 1 responds by stating it’s not warp speed, but has been happening since 06/10/1980 when entering a Fort Detrick military installation, where the sign was turned around with then-president Richard Nixon. He says, “Oh, we’re just gonna cure cancer,” but asserts they turned the sign around on the bioweapons lab, making it a historic landmark at Fort Detrick where they had the gas chamber for the end and a plaque was placed when a new lab was built. He characterizes it as all part of a “plague of corruption” and claims that those involved are protecting themselves because the government, and they played the game. Speaker 1 further alleges that it does not matter whether it is Deborah Birx or Robert Redfield, because they injected the military with HIV in the nineties, and that they know it. He references “HIV p n l four three” and claims to know the plasmid and the exact one, asserting that he knows the people who were injected and that this data exists in his freezer.

The speaker discusses the layers of liability protection surrounding COVID-19 vaccines and questions why they are necessary if the vaccines are safe and effective. They mention a case against EcoHealth Alliance for allegedly creating the virus in a Wuhan lab with the help of the DOD and CIA. The speaker presents evidence, including military medical records, suggesting that COVID-19 may have been developed years before its official timeline. They also mention Pfizer documents discussing shedding and a study protocol related to gene therapy. The speaker emphasizes the need for further investigation into the involvement of the DOD and CIA and presents their evidence without drawing conclusions.

In 2012, DARPA initiated the ADEPT Protect P3 program for pandemic prevention using gene-encoded vaccines. The military had been working on mRNA vaccines since then, not as a response to COVID-19. Operation Warp Speed was not as rapid as claimed, with contractors like Moderna receiving funding in 2013. The military's involvement in developing vaccines and monoclonal antibodies predates the pandemic, with emergency use authorization primarily for military use. The FDA's lack of control over the process reflects its military origin, executed with military precision. No one is exempt from its reach.

Project Veritas has obtained military documents revealing information about the origins of COVID-19, gain of function research, vaccines, and potential treatments. These documents contradict Dr. Anthony Fauci's claims that the US government was not involved in gain of function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The documents include a report from DARPA, a US Department of Defense agency, which states that EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in 2018 seeking funding for dangerous gain of function research. DARPA rejected the proposal, but the NIAID, under Dr. Fauci's direction, proceeded with the research in Wuhan and other US sites. The question arises as to why the NIH, NIAID, and EcoHealth Alliance disregarded the risks when even the Department of Defense deemed the research too dangerous.

The COVID-19 vaccines were rolled out under a series of laws that allowed the military to take over distribution, bypassing typical clinical trials and safety testing. The FDA's involvement was a "pretend authorization," as their mandate is to regulate interstate commerce of medical products, not countermeasures. The Department of Defense is fully in charge of the development, clinical trials, manufacturing, and distribution of the vaccines, utilizing "other transaction authority" (OTA), initially intended for NASA and weapons procurement. The vaccines are purchased under OTA as demonstration products, exempting them from FDA and CDC authority. Pharmaceutical companies were brought in largely for branding purposes, while the military oversaw manufacturing and distribution through military contractors.

The speaker discusses the layers of liability protection surrounding COVID-19 vaccines and questions why they are necessary if the vaccines are safe and effective. They mention a case against EcoHealth Alliance for allegedly creating the virus in a Wuhan lab with the help of the DOD and CIA. The speaker presents evidence, including military medical records, suggesting that COVID-19 may have been developed years before its official timeline. They also mention Pfizer documents discussing shedding and a study protocol related to gene therapy. The speaker emphasizes the need for further investigation into the involvement of the DOD and CIA in the creation of COVID-19.

Project Veritas says it has obtained never-before-seen military documents about the origins of COVID-19, gain-of-function research, vaccines, potential treatments, and government concealment. Fauci testified the US government was never involved in gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Major Murphy’s report claims EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in March 2018 to fund gain-of-function research on bat-borne coronaviruses. DARPA rejected the proposal as too dangerous and potentially violative of the gain-of-function moratorium. Documents allegedly show NIH/NIAID did not reject it and continued research at Wuhan and elsewhere. Fauci has maintained NIH/NIAID were not involved. Murphy’s report cites concerns about the gain-of-function program, concealment of documents, and suppression of potential curatives like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, and the mRNA vaccines. Veritas sought comment from DARPA; questions remain about how and why risks were disregarded and who buried the report that could have prevented the pandemic.

The speaker discusses the layers of liability protection surrounding COVID-19 vaccines and questions why they are necessary if the vaccines are safe and effective. They mention a case against EcoHealth Alliance for allegedly creating the virus in a Wuhan lab with the help of the DOD and CIA. The speaker presents evidence, including military medical records, suggesting that COVID-19 may have been developed years before its official timeline. They also mention Pfizer documents discussing shedding and a study protocol related to gene therapy. The speaker emphasizes the need for further investigation into the involvement of the DOD and CIA and presents their evidence for consideration.

In 2012, DARPA initiated the ADEPT Protect P3 program for pandemic prevention using gene-encoded vaccines. The military had been working on mRNA vaccines since then, not just in response to COVID-19. The rapid development of vaccines under Operation Warp Speed was part of a long-term military program. The FDA's lack of control over the process is due to its military origins. The military approach to vaccine development leaves no one exempt.

The speaker discusses how the pandemic was used to assert control, profit the pharmaceutical industry, and introduce surveillance measures. They highlight the involvement of intelligence agencies and the military in the pandemic response, with the NSA and Pentagon leading Operation Warp Speed. The speaker also mentions that the vaccines were developed by NIH and manufactured by military contractors, not by Moderna and Pfizer as claimed. They discuss the numerous pandemic simulations sponsored by the CIA over the years and the involvement of April Haines, the former deputy director of the CIA. The speaker questions the origins of the virus and the role of the CIA and Chinese CDC in suppressing the lab leak theory. They also provide a historical context of the US bioweapons program and its connection to the CIA and Pentagon.

Speaker 0 discusses the origin and framing of pandemic prevention and vaccine development as a military-led initiative. He cites a 2012 DARPA program called the Adept Protect p three program, described as a pandemic prevention platform. The proposal outlined the use of gene-encoded vaccines based on RNA or DNA with the goal of stopping a pandemic within sixty days. He suggests that, by the time President Trump referenced “Operation Warp Speed” to develop vaccines, there should have been preparation and acknowledgement that this work dated back to 2012, making it not rapid innovation but a decade-long effort. He argues that the public narrative of rapid development and stunning innovation surrounding vaccines is deceptive and that contractors like Moderna had already secured multi-million-dollar contracts in 2013. He notes that the military operates programs addressing biological threats and also works on answers such as monoclonal antibodies and vaccines. The claim is made that the military originated the idea of messenger RNA vaccines, not Pfizer or Moderna, and not in response to the outbreak from Wuhan. According to the speaker, this is a military program in origin and administration. The speaker asserts that Health and Human Services, under Alex Azar, together with the Department of Defense, ushered the public into a vaccine era, framing Emergency Use Authorization as a mechanism to rapidly deploy new technology into the military rather than the public. He contends that this mechanism’s broad public application began with the COVID-19 pandemic, which is presented as evidence that the FDA lacks ownership or control over the process because the program is characterized as military in origin and execution. The overall claim is that the program operates like a military operation with universal reach and without exemptions, implying a deeply embedded military approach to vaccine development and deployment. Throughout, the speaker emphasizes the continuity from a 2012 program proposal through to the public health landscape observed during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, asserting that the military’s involvement, timeline, and governance underlie the current vaccine paradigm and its regulatory pathways.