reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Enhancing the Chinese economy may have long-term consequences for us. It is crucial to minimize our investment and gradually reduce our dependence on Chinese trade. However, finding the right approach to achieve this is challenging.

We will save over a trillion dollars by withdrawing from the Paris Climate Treaty.

The speaker claims to help the environment while creating jobs, enabling them to stand up to the Americans from a position of strength. In response to criticisms about oil and gas subsidies and the industrial carbon tax, the speaker states that capital cost allowances are standard across corporate garments of industry. They claim to have answered this question previously, suggesting the questioner doesn't understand the tax code. The speaker also states that the biggest component of that was the cost of building.

Canada has opportunities in carbon capture, small modular reactors, and hydrogen, and could be a clean energy superpower. Mark Carney's ideas about energy omit the fact that Canada produces less than 1.5% of total global emissions. Even if Canada were wiped off the map, it wouldn't matter. Also, about 96% of all the machinery for climate change is made in China.

Joe Biden's energy policies are causing high inflation and hitting American families hard. He reversed actions that achieved energy independence and canceled the Keystone XL Pipeline. By reentering the Paris climate accord and blocking new oil, gas, and coal production, he is raising energy costs and hurting industries like food, shipping, and manufacturing. China benefits from these high energy prices, driving our heavy industry overseas. To become an advanced manufacturing nation, we need low-cost energy. Biden's energy agenda aligns with China's, as they sign global climate deals and break them. When I'm back in the White House, I'll bring back a pro-American energy policy, eliminating unnecessary regulations and approving energy projects quickly. This will create jobs, restore hope, and make America great again.

The Loan Program Office supplied a little over $40 billion in its fifteen years. Almost $100 billion was then supplied in the 76 days between the election loss and President Trump's inauguration. The speaker questions why, if these were beneficial ideas, they weren't implemented in the two and a half years after the Inflation Reduction Act. According to the speaker, the previous administration changed terms and loan covenants, attempting to complicate unwinding their actions. The speaker asserts this is not a responsible way to handle taxpayer money or advance the energy system. They state that they inherited a mess, but it is fixable with an aggressive team. They claim American energy prices are down and investments to bring jobs back are up, but acknowledge the need for cleanup.

China, Russia, and India have significant pollution issues. I withdrew from the Paris Accord because it unfairly burdened the U.S. with costs, potentially harming millions of jobs and thousands of businesses. While China and Russia have lenient standards, we would have faced immediate restrictions. Our environmental efforts have led to the cleanest air and water, along with the best carbon emission standards in years.

Canada has opportunities in carbon capture, small modular reactors, and hydrogen, and could be a clean energy superpower. Mark Carney's ideas about energy omit the fact that Canada produces less than 1.5% of total global emissions. Even if Canada were wiped off the map, it wouldn't matter. Also, about 96% of all the machinery for climate change is made in China.

Climate change is a pressing issue with devastating consequences. Countries like China are capitalizing on renewable energy and electric vehicle technologies. Canada must acknowledge climate change, shape its economic strategy accordingly, and ensure competitiveness in a declining oil and gas market. Failure to do so threatens economic prosperity. The government of Canada is investing $300 million to support hydrogen operations.

Professor Robert Pape warned on X that within ten days parts of the global economy will start running short of critical goods, based on thirty years studying economic sanctions and blockades. He said this would bring not just higher prices but shortages, and that markets are not ready for this. The Kobelisi letter stated the world is experiencing its biggest energy crisis in history with 600,000,000 barrels of lost oil supply, US gas prices up 47% since December, and inflation approaching 4% in a path similar to the 1970s. The discussion then touched on Iran’s war potentially returning to open conflict. The United States seized an Iranian-flagged cargo ship, which Larry Johnson described as piracy and an act of war aimed at clearing the Strait of Hormuz; Tehran called it armed piracy and promised a response. JD Vance was headed to Islamabad for talks, though Iranian officials said they had not agreed to anything. Fox’s Tel Aviv correspondent relayed that Trump told him they would blow up everything in Iran if they didn’t come to the table, saying the deal would reopen the Strait of Hormuz and prevent Iran from possessing highly enriched uranium. Professor Pape, director of the Chicago Project on Security and Threats at the University of Chicago and author of Escalation Trap on Substack, joined the program. He referenced his April 12 post predicting shortages within forty-five to sixty days and described three stages: Stage one, the first ~45 days with price increases; Stage two (40–60 days) with shortages emerging; Stage three (day 60–90) with worsening shortages and then contraction, beginning around May 31. He explained that shortages would escalate into reduced production of commodities, fewer airline seats, and broader disruptions across supply chains. Pape detailed the implications for air travel and energy: jet fuel shortages could cause European and global aviation reductions, with Europe’s ~110,000,000 monthly air passengers dropping to potentially 80 million or fewer as fuel becomes scarce; cargo, mail, and just-in-time deliveries would be affected, and overall product availability would contract. He argued that 20% of the world’s oil passes through the Strait of Hormuz and that Iran’s potential shutdown and the U.S. response would complicate efforts to keep that oil flowing. He emphasized that the contraction would begin even as oil access becomes more difficult and other nations (including the U.S.) struggle to secure energy. The conversation then shifted to China. Pape noted that in China, the impact on GDP could be modest (about 1%), but the U.S. could be drawn into a larger conflict that could benefit China. He observed China’s preparation for energy independence: stockpiling oil, relying on solar, nuclear, and coal, and maintaining a robust energy strategy even during tensions with the U.S. He suggested that tariffs and conflicts did not significantly disrupt China’s planning, which could lead to China gaining relative advantage as the U.S. faces a widening energy and economic crisis. There was discussion about the United States’ energy independence. Pape stated he has long advocated energy independence since 2005, but warned that the broader picture involves debt, energy policy, and strategic choices that could threaten American leadership. He stressed the need for a concrete five-year plan to navigate the crisis without harming the economy in the short term and cautioned against escalating war in Iran. In addressing the everyday impact, the speakers considered who would be hardest hit: the poorest, and particularly non-college-educated white working-class voters, who had experienced the largest deterioration in income since 1990. The conversation included proposals to mitigate consumer pain, such as targeted economic measures for working Americans affected by rising gas prices, potentially including tax considerations or subsidies for those whose jobs require fuel, while avoiding broad handouts. Pape reiterated that his Escalation Trap Substack presents a framework based on twenty-one years of modeling the bombing of Iran and indicates that the stages he predicted are unfolding faster than anticipated, with a focus on concrete policy options that could be enacted by May 1. He emphasized that his analysis centers on consequences for ordinary people and urged practical policy steps to address the crisis.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss China’s energy strategy and its impact on technology and transportation. - Energy security and abundance: Speaker 0 notes that energy security is critical for China and that China has developed significant energy abundance, contrasting it with Western Europe’s move away from coal and nuclear. He suggests China’s position supports its AI leadership by avoiding power restrictions seen in the United States. - Nuclear energy expansion: Speaker 1 confirms China’s rapid growth in nuclear power, mentioning reports of 17 new nuclear power plants, and then 50, with the count continually increasing. He ties this to daily life examples, stating an indoor ski park in Shenzhen is powered by nuclear energy from a nearby plant, highlighting the southern China context (Shenzhen/Hong Kong) and high summer electricity demand. He also recalls historical opposition to nuclear projects in the 1980s as part of long-term planning by the Chinese central government to ensure energy independence. - Energy independence and long-term planning: The conversation emphasizes that China has been planning for decades to achieve energy independence through domestic energy production, including nuclear energy. - Battery technology and EVs: Speaker 0 points out CATL’s recent breakthrough in battery technology, noting a nickel manganese cobalt addition to lithium that yields high energy density and lower battery weight, implying a competitive edge in EVs. He contrasts China’s ability to supply advanced batteries with the American restriction on buying Chinese EVs, and mentions Canada’s potential deal to import Chinese vehicles, suggesting China’s hold on leading EV tech. - EV adoption and oil reliance: Speaker 1 agrees that China’s EV push is strategic for energy independence from crude oil, countering past criticism that China’s EV effort was a “dead end.” He states that about 60% of new vehicles are EVs (up from ~50%), and attributes increased EV demand to Middle Eastern events. He notes that a surplus of EVs from China’s production last year is being rapidly sold, with exports doubling since the Middle Eastern conflict began in March. - COVID- and political commentary: The speakers touch briefly on political context, including a humorous remark about Donald Trump inadvertently boosting Chinese EV exports, suggesting he could be seen as helping to export the Chinese EV industry. They joke about awarding him a commission, framing it as a surprising accelerant to Chinese EV sales. - Summary sentiment: The discussion centers on China’s nuclear expansion, its pursuit of energy independence, advances in battery technology, the rapid shift to electric vehicles, and the resulting impact on oil reliance and export growth, with a light aside on geopolitical factors influencing demand.

A Chinese company is planning to build an electric vehicle battery plant in Michigan and intends to bring 20 to 50 Chinese nationals to the United States. Concerns are raised about the potential for espionage by these individuals on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party. It is believed that the Chinese government will exploit this opportunity to gather intelligence and gain economic advantages that are contrary to the interests of the United States. It is crucial to use intelligence capabilities to monitor their activities and protect national security. The construction of these plants is seen as a significant threat and should not proceed.

Ranking member Raskin is creating a "boogeyman" that isn't there. The speaker authored the EPA chapter on project 2020 5, but did not work with President Trump or his campaign. The speaker is not vying for a position in the next administration and now lives in Mississippi. The leading candidate is running away from policy actions that make Americans' lives difficult. Vice President Kamala Harris did not answer when asked if Americans are better off than they were 4 years ago. Most Americans are struggling with expensive gas, electricity, and groceries due to the Biden-Harris Administration's day 1 energy policies. Since January 2021, President Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and Congressional Democrats have taken over 250 actions that make it harder to produce energy in America. Actions include stopping the Keystone XL Pipeline, issuing a moratorium on new oil and gas permits on federal lands, greenlighting Putin's Nord Stream 2 pipeline, rejoining the Paris climate agreement, blocking the Twin Metals mine, and slowing permits for LNG facilities.

The Loan Program Office supplied a little over $40 billion in its fifteen years, then almost $100 billion in the 76 days between the election loss and President Trump's inauguration. The speaker questions why these actions weren't taken in the two and a half years after the Inflation Reduction Act passed. According to the speaker, the previous administration changed terms and loan covenants, attempting to complicate any unwinding of their actions. The speaker characterizes this as irresponsible treatment of taxpayer money and detrimental to energy system progress. The speaker states that while they inherited a mess, it is fixable. They claim their team is aggressively addressing the issues, resulting in lower American energy prices and increased investments bringing jobs back to America.

The Biden administration has set a new record for regulatory spending, surpassing both Trump and Obama. They have spent over $1.37 trillion on regulations, with a focus on climate change initiatives like vehicle emission standards. Despite creating fewer rules, their programs are costing billions more. This spending is described as a "regulatory tsunami" and has led to a significant paperwork burden. The total regulatory costs of the Biden administration would rank 17th in the world if it were a country's GDP, just behind Indonesia.

Speaker 0 introduces a myth that Trump waging war against Iran would close the Strait in a way that hurts China first, making Trump victorious, and asks for an answer to that perception. Speaker 1 argues that the perception isn't accurate, noting China has been building energy security for over twenty years. They travel to China frequently and see zero signs of energy scarcity; if there were any potential energy squeeze, it would be visible among the people and on social media, but it isn’t. He explains China’s energy composition is stable, and that even if Middle Eastern energy supplies were disrupted, China’s situation remains manageable. He states that China actually produces 30% of the crude oil it consumes domestically, so it does not import all its energy. Speaker 0 adds that people are often surprised by how much solar, wind, and hydropower China has, mentioning a special report noting that the aggregate annual terawatt-hours of output of China’s power grid is more than double the United States, and that this is growing rapidly. Speaker 1 confirms the rapid growth and attributes part of China’s diversification to the influence of Western financial practices, saying, “thanks to the Western banking cartel because they have been suppressing the price of silver to ridiculous low prices.” He claims China imports all the silver to manufacture solar panels, implying that by maintaining low silver prices, Western bankers have inadvertently helped China with energy diversification.

China is using green technology to make the United States and other developed countries dependent on them. They expect Western countries to reduce fossil fuel emissions and go green, while they themselves don't take responsibility for historic global warming. This strategy is dishonest and subverts the United States' national security by making it reliant on China for energy. Wind, solar, and electric vehicles all rely on rare earth minerals, which China controls. They have no environmental regulations and process the majority of rare earths. China is also the sole producer of refined graphite used in EV batteries. Despite this dependence, politicians are pushing for green mandates without considering the implications of relying on China. This situation is frustrating and puts the US at risk of being owned by China.

The deindustrialization of Germany seems like a market, what, move towards insanity. Oh, And this remarkable situation where China and India are industrializing at a rate that leaves Europe and its negligible effect on the environment in the dust Right. And increasingly so and at an ever accelerating rate. All of the industry that's leaving Europe and the West in general is localizing in China and in India. China's building coal fired plants at a rate that's just staggering and we all breathe the same The whole bloody climate change narrative is a scam and a lie. It's not warming up, it's increased variability.

Speaker 0 questions whether the “woke era” is a failed experiment and references ESG and DEI as part of that push, noting a shift toward talking in practical terms about what can be done. Speaker 1 reflects on the pendulum of society, noting that BlackRock manages money for a wide range of investors. He says, today, renewables are less talked about, but many investors worldwide are investing in renewables, emphasizing solar and related technologies. He mentions working with Occidental Petroleum to build carbon capture factories in Texas. He states that the pendulum five years ago was too far and that he is personally more pragmatic. He asks whether BlackRock pushed some companies a little left of center, clarifying that it was never their intention because their job is to be a fiduciary to everyone who gives them money. He explains their responsibility: if an investor wants to invest 100% in hydrocarbons in Texas, they will invest the full amount in Texas; if another state fund wants them to invest in all green energy, they will do that because it’s their money. Speaker 1 emphasizes that today, due to AI and the overwhelming need for power and electricity, energy strategy cannot be one-dimensional. It cannot be solely hydrocarbon. He notes that China is rapidly building more nuclear than any other country, has the largest solar fields, yet remains the biggest importer of gas and oil. He concludes that, more importantly today, society has moved into a better position of having more pragmatism, and what Speaker 1 is expressing echoes what their clients are saying.

Crooked Joe Biden and the Democrats want to shut down all US coal plants, despite the lessons learned in Germany and other places. Meanwhile, China is rapidly building one large coal plant per week. This is concerning because it seems like the USA is heading towards self-destruction. We must prevent this from happening by eliminating the Green News scam, which is a total fraud and is detrimental to our country.

The speaker claims to help the environment while creating jobs, enabling economic independence and strength against the Americans. Regarding criticisms about oil and gas subsidies and the industrial carbon tax, the speaker states that capital cost allowances are standard across corporate garments of industry. They claim to have answered this question previously, suggesting critics don't understand the tax code. The speaker also acknowledges that the biggest component of cost was building.