reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker sets out to “clear up” fascism, communism, and totalitarianism by arguing they are not simple opposites but rival forms arising from the same collectivist impulse. He cites Mussolini’s definition of fascism as corporatism—the merger of corporate and government power—and the view that “for the fascist, everything is the state and nothing human or spiritual exists, much less has value outside the state.” He then paraphrases Ayn Rand, saying “Fascism and communism are not two opposites, but two rival gangs fighting over the same territory” based on the collectivist principle that man is the rightless slave of the state. He notes that the Nazis’ National Socialism fused unions, industry, and state into a totalitarian system, and labels that form of totalitarianism as fascism. Turning to today, he argues Mussolini’s corporatist definition best fits recent developments, with “the corporate and governments joining into a merger” aided by the World Economic Forum (WEF), United Nations (UN), and related entities. He traces a historical lineage: in the late 1950s, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund funded the Special Studies Project, with Nelson Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger involved, aiming to “shape a new world order” across spiritual, economic, political, and social dimensions. The CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) and David Rockefeller are described as coordinating global leaders to build a globalist system, identifying global challenges—health, pandemics, population, climate change—as pathways to global governance. He emphasizes climate change as an opportunity to promote globalism, noting Harvard’s International Seminar (funded by Ford, Rockefeller, and others) and Klaus Schwab’s rise to prominence, leading to the European Economic Forum in 1971 and its evolution into the World Economic Forum (WEF). Key players and structures are listed: Barbara Ward’s push for sustainable development and climate focus; the Club of Rome and its Limits to Growth; Giovanni Agnelli linking banking and big oil with Rockefeller figures; the Davos forum’s shift to sustainability, stakeholder capitalism, and climate. He highlights funding and influence from major banks and financial institutions, the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, and Bilderberg participants, asserting a broad network guiding global policy. From the 1970s onward, he covers milestones: the 1972 Stockholm conference on climate, the 1987 World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtland) and Our Common Future; Agenda 21 (1992) from Rio; Bilderberg meetings; the 1990s and 2000s’s Davos and the emergence of the Global Leaders of the WEF; the 2020 initiative and the identification of pandemics, climate risk, and digital governance as future imperatives. He notes the 2006 Global Risks report’s mention of a pandemic and misinformation, arguing they anticipated the 2020 pandemic and the censorship that followed. He argues that public-private partnerships represent totalitarianism, with “the state and corporate power” merged and “the politicians… taking orders from the top levels.” He contends the UN Global Goals and the 2019 formal joining of WEF with the UN formalize a global government, promoting the Fourth Industrial Revolution to reshape the physical world, environment, space surveillance, and digital technology. The Decade of Action (2019) culminates in a 2020 pandemic as part of a planned sequence toward global governance. He concludes that fascism, communism, and totalitarianism are effectively the same at core: “the state” or “the corporate governmental” structure controlling individuals, with “fascism and communism” as rival narratives used to advance a single collectivist end. The closing thanks acknowledge supporters and invite further contributions.

If fascism ever comes to America, it will come in the name of liberalism. Fascism is characterized by private ownership and enterprise, but with total government control and regulation. This aligns with the liberal philosophy, whereas conservatives advocate for less government involvement and more control over their own destiny.

Hitler distinguishes national socialism from Marxist socialism, stating that people confuse the concepts of national socialism with what we call today socialism, which is actually Marxism, Jewish communism. In response to questioning, Hitler defined national socialism as follows: “A socialist is one who serves the common good without giving up his individuality or personality or the product of his personal efficiency.” He adds that the adopted term socialist has nothing to do with Marxian socialism. He asserts that Marxism is anti-property, while true socialism is not. Marxism, he says, places no value on the individual, individual effort, or efficiency, whereas true socialism values the individual and encourages him in individual efficiency, while maintaining that his interests as an individual must align with those of the community. He emphasizes that all great inventions, discoveries, and achievements were first the product of an individual brain. Hitler addresses charges that he is against property and that he is an atheist, stating that both charges are false. He then contrasts the socialist state with the communist state: in the socialist state, the individual or his professional community retains the individual and joint responsibility for himself or his professional associates; in the communist state, all responsibility and care are assumed by the state and shifted onto it. He argues that socialism preserves individual liberty with a view to the welfare of the general public, while communism abolishes this freedom through collectivization, that is, by creating herds. To illustrate the concept of national socialism, he suggests replacing the word socialist with the word team, positing that a team, whether in sports or other areas, would find it rather unlikely to achieve greatness without the concepts described. In summary, the statements frame national socialism as distinct from Marxian socialism and communism, defining true socialism as valuing and preserving individual liberty and efficiency within a community-oriented framework, while asserting that communism eliminates personal freedom through state-controlled collectivization. The analogy to a team is offered to illustrate how collective effort requires safeguarding individual contribution and responsibility.

The German nation seeks to maintain its interests without foreign influence, emphasizing that each nation should be governed by its own people. There is a commitment to educate intelligent children from the working class to take on leadership roles, ensuring that German culture is preserved and managed by Germans. The aim is to counteract forces that threaten national unity and economy, particularly against what is perceived as international Jewish financial dominance. Marxism, whether in social democracy or communism, can be challenged through a more truthful yet equally forceful approach. It is essential to resist impending doom and take proactive measures, which inspired the founding of the National Socialist German Workers' Party.

To create a better world, we must unite against a common threat, rallying around a leader who has taken practical steps for Europe and civilization. Adolf Hitler transformed Germany into an authoritarian socialist state, addressing bankruptcy and unemployment while promoting national sovereignty and self-sufficiency. His policies were rooted in German traditions and aimed to counter globalization and liberalism. The economic reforms he implemented, such as job creation and tax relief, revitalized the economy and reduced unemployment. Hitler's rejection of the gold standard in favor of a barter system based on productivity further asserted Germany's independence. This rapid economic turnaround, coupled with a disdain for liberal democracy, led to international opposition against Germany, resulting in significant suffering for its people.

Hitler was labeled a fascist, but he was actually a socialist. Fascism is a left-wing ideology where the government controls what you can do with your property. The Nazis were put on trial by the communists, who came out looking better despite having killed more people. Ayn Rand believes that all these "isms" are nonsense and that it's really about individualism versus collectivism. Collectivists are communist fascists who lie and steal from you.

Governments used to prioritize meeting people's needs to prevent the resurgence of fascism. However, the rise of neoliberalism led to the dismantling of social safety nets and public services. This dangerous trend paves the way for fascism to return, as it promises to solve problems caused by the very forces that created them. Without viable alternatives, people may turn to anti-politics, particularly fascism. But research shows that our dominant characteristics are empathy, altruism, and kindness towards others. We must unite in unprecedented numbers to resist the extreme cult that seeks to impose its beliefs on us.

Adolf Hitler's major crime was freeing Germany from crippling debt by printing their own money. He revitalized the country, leading it to prosperity. The speaker suggests confronting the financial system by printing our own money. They argue that Hitler's actions were not those of an evil man, but of someone who loved his country and its people. Genuine smiles on Germans' faces meeting Hitler reflect their gratitude for the improved living conditions. This challenges the negative narrative surrounding Hitler and encourages reevaluation of history.

Every ism, except Nazism, was founded and/or led disproportionately by Jews. Marxism, humanism, socialism, environmentalism, and feminism were all founded or led by Jews. It's the Jews.

True nationalism celebrates global diversity by valuing each race's unique heritage and culture. National Socialists believe in preserving individual characteristics in their own countries. Globalism and cultural Marxism aim to erase racial identity, promoting a homogenized society. Forced mass immigration and miscegenation are seen as threats to a nation's beauty and culture.

Adolf Hitler's National Socialist government aimed to restore democracy based on community principles, with a focus on family support and social welfare. Policies included interest-free loans for married couples to start families, affordable housing, improved farmer conditions, anti-smoking laws, and animal protection measures. Hitler's actions were praised for lifting Germany out of economic hardship. Critics argue that Hitler's defiance of bankers and printing of money led to Germany's recovery, challenging conventional historical narratives. Supporters highlight the positive impact on German citizens' lives and the nation's resurgence under Hitler's leadership.

The decline of the German automobile industry is attributed to two main factors. First, the social democratic theory of equality promoted a primitive standard of living, hindering individual progress and viewing automobiles as unnecessary luxuries. Progressive development requires respect for individual creativity and marketability. Marxist states rely on individual experts from other economies, proving that Bolshevism cannot survive without external help. Second, governments, influenced by Marxist ideology, taxed automobiles heavily, neglecting the industry's potential. Fiscal authorities stifled road traffic development. In contrast to America's millions of automobiles, Germany had limited numbers. The German economy failed to recognize the automobile's potential as a tool for the general public. The industry needed to align pricing with customer incomes to reach a broader market. The desire for automobiles in Germany is strong, and the price must correspond to potential buyers' incomes. The Volkswagen project aims to make car ownership accessible to millions, which will also benefit manufacturers of more expensive cars. Excluding millions from car ownership due to concerns about wealthier individuals buying cheaper cars is economically unwise. Germany's fuel supply crisis is being overcome through chemistry and invention, and synthetic rubber surpasses natural rubber in performance.

There are three choices before us: communism, a destructive plutocracy, or a true revolution that embraces nationalism and socialism. I believe our civilization, built over 2,000 years, cannot be destroyed by opposing ideologies. The victory of liberators, whether from the east or west, signifies a Jewish victory that would lead to the downfall of our civilization, akin to the fates of Babylon, Athens, and Rome. We risk entering a dark, barbaric era if we fail to defend our heritage. To create a better world, we must unite under one leader. Regardless of our political views, if we wish to save our civilization, we must rally behind the German army and Adolf Hitler.

Speaker 1 argues that emancipation, granting Jews citizenship in European nations, marked the beginning of a catastrophe. He claims this granted equality to a people who have always existed “as a nation within nations,” and that this transformation happened gradually, leading to Jews obtaining every right of native Germans. He connects this to changes in economic life, asserting that a new international financial order centered in the stock exchange and banks operates “according to principles entirely foreign to the German character,” with foreigners’ interests opposed to the welfare of their people. He contrasts Western Europe and Central Europe, noting that in England and France industrialization drew farm workers into cities but the foreign element remained small and blendable, whereas in his view the German experience differed. Speaker 1 then critiques democracy as manipulation of the masses, describing it as the rule of quantity over quality, designed to make people believe they are free while serving purposes they do not understand. He explains a cycle of two or three opposing parties, a public spectacle of choice, and a constant invocation of “freedom” that forfeits real freedom as opinion is controlled by others. Germany’s path is described as different: loyalty has historically centered on the monarch, the army, and the state, with German industry having the potential to unite workers with traditional German institutions rather than oppose them. When the workers’ movement is captured, the working class’ legitimate grievances are diverted into an international, class-based struggle rather than a national one. Speaker 1 condemns Marxism as teaching that property is theft and that everything must be held in common, arguing that honest Germans would reject such a doctrine. He laments the replacement of leadership with professional agitators whose loyalty lies elsewhere, citing Russia as the final destination of this power: a once-great civilization reduces to chaos, churches plundered, productive classes destroyed, millions starving, and a nation transformed into a colony exploited by those in power. He asserts that Germany’s economy deteriorates daily, prices rise, wages fall, and both the stock exchange and speculators prosper while workers suffer. Political life is described as a circus, with foreign powers displacing Germany’s interests. He contends that “powerful interests” profit from German weakness, and that disarmament and submission were met with continued disrespect and demands. Speaker 1 states that Germans are awakening, rejecting old slogans, and recognizing that international solidarity harms them. He proposes an alternative path: a genuinely national and social movement, where the welfare of the nation precedes profits of speculators and theories of internationalists. He defines socialism as recognizing that prosperity depends on all Germans and that a nation cannot thrive while millions live in misery. Nationalism is framed as recognizing a unique German character, heritage, and destiny, with a duty to the German people first. He envisions a movement where workers and managers, farmers and scholars, unite for common goals, resisting those who exploit German weakness. Speaker 0 contextualizes: this speech was delivered in Munich in 1922; eleven years later, Hitler became chancellor, and the ideology would lead to World War II and the Holocaust, with 6,000,000 Jews and millions of others perishing. The primary source is presented for historical and educational purposes.

Men of character build good societies, while those solely focused on money have taken control and harmed many. Some may see this as a conspiracy involving the CIA and Israel's intelligence agency.

During the Third Reich, the National Socialists were indeed socialists, nationalizing industries extensively. Adolf Hitler identified as a socialist and was mischaracterized as right-wing and conservative after that era. In reality, he was neither conservative nor libertarian; he aligned more with communist socialist ideologies. This mislabeling has obscured the true nature of his beliefs and policies.

Governments used to prioritize meeting people's needs to prevent the resurgence of fascism. They ensured economic security and access to public services. However, neoliberalism led to the dismantling of social safety nets. This process is now accelerating, creating a dangerous environment where fascism can thrive. Fascists claim to solve problems and fight corruption, but they are often supported by the very forces that caused the issues. Without viable alternatives, people may turn to anti-politics, particularly fascism. However, research shows that empathy, altruism, and kindness are our dominant characteristics. We must unite in unprecedented numbers to resist the extreme cult imposing their beliefs on us.

There are those who believe in a more profitable type of government and see the competence of totalitarian nations as higher than ours. However, others argue that this philosophy leads to bombing cities, sinking ships, and torture. They oppose both fascism and communism. The speaker emphasizes the importance of understanding that there is a class war happening, which politicians rarely talk about. They mention a biocommunications weapon brought by Nazi scientists in 1945, which led to the creation of the CIA and their crimes against citizens. The debate continues about the effectiveness and ethics of totalitarianism.

The decline of the German automobile industry is due to two main factors. First, the social democratic theory of equality promoted a primitive standard of living, hindering individual progress and viewing automobiles as unnecessary luxuries. True progress originates from individuals, not collectives, and requires respect for individual creativity and marketability. Marxist states rely on individual expertise borrowed from other economies, proving that Bolshevism cannot survive without external help. Second, the government, influenced by Marxist ideas, taxed automobiles heavily, neglecting the industry's potential. Fiscal authorities stifled the development of German road traffic. While America had millions of cars, Germany had far fewer. The German economy failed to recognize the automobile as a tool for the general public. The industry needed to align pricing with customer incomes to reach a broader market. The desire for automobiles in Germany is strong, and the price must correspond to potential buyers' incomes. A German Volkswagen will mobilize millions and boost the sales of more expensive cars. The crisis of Germany's fuel supply has been overcome through the work of chemists and inventors. Tires made of German synthetic rubber surpass natural rubber in durability, as proven by Wehrmacht tests.

The speaker differentiates between state capitalism and shareholder or private capitalism, describing it as a clash between two systems. State capitalism has short-term advantages because it can mobilize resources to reach objectives. However, the speaker believes the future is not state capitalism or shareholder capitalism. The future is stakeholder capitalism combined with social responsibility.

Individualists believe in personal responsibility for oneself, family, and others in need, while collectivists argue for state responsibility. Socialism, communism, globalism, and Nazism are forms of collectivism, with globalism aiming for a one-world government under the guise of unity and sustainability, often using crises to push their agenda.

Speaker 0 outlines National Socialism as an ideology about life and the cultivation of life: building strong families with moral, healthy children on a path of virtue to create a brighter national future. It emphasizes cooperation across class, gender, and all members of society, viewing the nation as a body where every part works together. The working class has a duty to work hard and a right to economic justice; bosses have a right to profit but must prioritize the worker, family, and nation. National Socialism seeks “nationalism without capitalism, and from the left, socialism without internationalism,” placing the nation first and rejecting capitalism and communism as Jewish ideologies that reduce humans to cogs, tearing apart the working class and families and turning the nation into a “fire sale.” It advocates a national community where everyone has rights, duties, and responsibilities, and condemns foreign importation of peoples and ideologies, radical feminism, abortion, and a culture of death. It calls for the cultivation of virtue, rejection of modern Western degeneracy and radical individualism, and the creation of beauty in art, cities, and communities. It presents National Socialism as a life-affirming, humane system that seeks peace globally, and aims for every ethnicity to strengthen its destiny while opposing the “international Jew” and “international capitalists.” The ideology is described as following natural law, shared by Christians, Pagans, or agnostics, and emphasizes an extended family and national community not at war over differences. It concludes with a pledge to environment, animals, water, air, blood, and culture, describing National Socialism as an ideology for those who love their faith, family, and country. Speaker 1 asserts that democracy has evolved; the National Socialists seek to revive a democracy “to its original and rightful meaning” as a community of the people, with referenda guiding important issues and a form of democracy more pure and representative than today. It celebrates Hitler’s Germany as valuing motherhood and children, with the Cross of Honor of the German Mother awarded to prolific mothers. In 1933, Hitler enacted a law enabling married couples to obtain interest-free loans (minimum 1,000 Reichsmark, about nine months’ salary) to set up homes and start families; for each birth, the couple could keep 250 marks and need not repay it. With four children, the debt could be canceled entirely, and over ten years a family with four children would earn more than the loan. Women were regarded as guardians of future generations; housing was built nationwide for workers, with villages of small single-family homes and affordable monthly rents. By 1933, 200,000 buildings were constructed under the program, and within four years nearly 1,500,000 more were built, with worker rents about one-eighth of earnings. Farmers’ economic situations improved, with 17,611 houses built for farmers in 1933 and 91,000 within three years. The NS regime campaigned against smoking and funded the Institute for the Struggle Against Tobacco; Germany was the first to ban smoking on public transit. In 1937, the state prohibited alcohol sales to minors and imposed penalties for drunken driving, including a blood test for drivers suspected of DUI. Hitler is credited with creating a law against animal mistreatment, and a ban on animal experiments and vivisection, described as necessary to protect animals and humanity.

Meine lieben deutschen Volksgenossen, man nennt uns schon Monster. Besonders monströs sei, dass wir in der Frage vorangehen, die gewisse Herren in Deutschland heute am meisten beunruhigt, nämlich die Frage der Bekämpfung des Judentums. Die Arbeiter fragen, was die Judenfrage mit den Arbeitern zu tun hat. Die Mehrheit beurteilt die Frage emotional. Arbeit ist eine Tätigkeit, die man nicht für sich selbst, sondern zum Wohle der Mitmenschen verrichtet. Arbeit hat drei Stufen durchlaufen: Selbsterhaltung, egoistische Gründe, moralische Pflicht. Not zwang den Menschen im Norden zur Arbeit und zur Erfindung. Harte Bedingungen führten zur Rassereinigung. Wo der Mensch äußerlich gefesselt ist, beginnt sein inneres Leben sich zu entwickeln. Diese drei Errungenschaften gaben den nordischen Rassen die Fähigkeit, sich auszubreiten und Staaten zu bilden. Die Juden sehen Arbeit als Strafe. Für sie ist Arbeit nur ein Mittel zur Selbsterhaltung. Das ist Raub. Der Jude wurde nicht gereinigt, sondern inzestuös. Ihm fehlt die innere spirituelle Erfahrung. Er hat keine eigene Kunst. Wenn einem Volk diese Eigenschaften fehlen, kann es keinen Staat bilden. Jerusalem war nicht die Hauptstadt eines jüdischen Nationalstaates. Der Jude lebte primär als Parasit auf dem Körper anderer Völker. Das zionistische Staatsprojekt ist eine Komödie. Arianismus bedeutet eine moralische Vorstellung von Arbeit, Sozialismus, Gemeinnutz vor Eigennutz. Judentum bedeutet eine egoistische Vorstellung von Arbeit, Mammonismus und Materialismus, das Gegenteil von Sozialismus. Der Jude muss staatszerstörend wirken. Er ist unfähig, einen eigenen Staat zu bilden. Er lebt als Parasit in anderen Staaten. Der Jude dringt seit Urzeiten in andere Rassen ein. Wann immer er lange irgendwo gelebt hat, haben sich die Zeichen des Zusammenbruchs bemerkbar gemacht. Die Völker mussten sich des unerwünschten Gastes entledigen oder selbst zugrunde gehen. Industriekapital kann man nicht bekämpfen. Bekämpft werden muss Leih- und Finanzkapital. Dieses Kapital ist international, weil seine Träger, die Juden, international verbreitet sind. Dieses Kapital korrumpiert alle ehrliche Arbeit. Karl Marx wollte die moralische Vorstellung von Arbeit verändern und die Menschen für die Zerstörung der nationalen Wirtschaft mobilisieren. Der Jude zerstört alles, was für einen kultivierten Staat notwendig ist. Er karikiert die Kunst. Er ist Herausgeber von über 95 % aller Zeitungen. Er verwandelt das Theater in eine Brutstätte für Laster und Schamlosigkeit, das Kino in ein Vehikel für Schmutz. Er ist der Zuhälter von Mädchen. Liebe ist für Juden nur ein Geschäft. Er greift die Religion an. Jeder Deutsche muss ein Antisemit werden. Arianismus bedeutet eine moralische Vorstellung von Arbeit. Judentum bedeutet eine egoistische Vorstellung von Arbeit. Sozialismus ist untrennbar mit Nationalismus verbunden. Wir nennen uns Nationalsozialisten. Die Entfernung der Juden aus unserem Volk wird unnachgiebig sein. English Translation: My dear German compatriots, we are already called monsters. It is considered particularly monstrous that we are at the forefront of the issue that most worries certain gentlemen in Germany today, namely the issue of combating Jewry. Workers ask what the Jewish question has to do with workers. The majority judges the question emotionally. Work is an activity that one does not do for oneself, but for the benefit of one's fellow human beings. Work has gone through three stages: self-preservation, selfish reasons, moral duty. Necessity forced people in the north to work and invent. Harsh conditions led to racial purification. Where man is externally fettered, his inner life begins to develop. These three achievements gave the Nordic races the ability to spread and form states. The Jews see work as punishment. For them, work is only a means of self-preservation. That is robbery. The Jew was not purified, but incestuous. He lacks inner spiritual experience. He has no art of his own. If a people lacks these qualities, it cannot form a state. Jerusalem was not the capital of a Jewish nation state. The Jew lived primarily as a parasite on the body of other peoples. The Zionist state project is a comedy. Arianism means a moral conception of work, socialism, the common good before self-interest. Judaism means a selfish conception of work, mammonism and materialism, the opposite of socialism. The Jew must have a state-destroying effect. He is incapable of forming his own state. He lives as a parasite in other states. Since ancient times, the Jew has been penetrating other races. Whenever he has lived somewhere for a long time, the signs of collapse have become noticeable. The peoples had to get rid of the unwanted guest or perish themselves. Industrial capital cannot be fought. Loan and finance capital must be fought. This capital is international because its bearers, the Jews, are internationally dispersed. This capital corrupts all honest work. Karl Marx wanted to change the moral conception of work and mobilize people for the destruction of the national economy. The Jew destroys everything that is necessary for a civilized state. He caricatures art. He is the editor of over 95% of all newspapers. He transforms the theater into a breeding ground for vice and shamelessness, the cinema into a vehicle for filth. He is the pimp of girls. For Jews, love is just a business. He attacks religion. Every German must become an anti-Semite. Arianism means a moral conception of work. Judaism means a selfish conception of work. Socialism is inextricably linked to nationalism. We call ourselves National Socialists. The removal of the Jews from our people will be relentless.

Governments used to prioritize meeting people's needs after World War II to prevent the rise of fascism. They ensured economic security and access to public services. However, the rise of neoliberalism led to the dismantling of social safety nets. This has accelerated recently, creating a dangerous environment where fascism can thrive. Fascist movements claim to solve problems caused by the very forces they support. Without viable alternatives, people may turn to anti-politics, such as fascism. However, research shows that empathy, altruism, and kindness are our dominant characteristics. We must unite against this extreme cult trying to impose their beliefs on us.

National socialism is distinct from what is called socialism today (Marxism) and from Jewish communism; they are, in practice, exact opposites. In response to questioning, Adolf Hitler defined socialism as follows: “A socialist is one who serves the common good without giving up his individuality or personality or the product of his personal efficiency.” He adds that “Our adopted term socialist has nothing to do with Marxian socialism.” The speaker then contrasts Marxism with true socialism. Marxism is anti-property; true socialism is not. “Marxism places no value on the individual or individual effort or efficiency,” whereas “True socialism values the individual and encourages him in individual efficiency, at the same time holding that his interests as an individual must be in consonance with those of the community.” He asserts, “All great inventions, discoveries, achievements were first the product of an individual brain.” The speaker addresses accusations that he is against property or an atheist, stating, “Both charges are false.” He proceeds to outline a clear difference between the socialist and the communist state. In the socialist state, “the individual or his professional community retains the individual and joint responsibility for himself or his professional associates.” In the communist state, “all responsibility and care is assumed by the state and shifted onto it.” Further distinctions are drawn: “Socialism preserves individual liberty with a view to the welfare of the general public. Communism abolishes this freedom through collectivization, that is, by creating herds.” To illuminate the concept of national socialism, the speaker suggests a linguistic test: “perhaps replace the word socialist in Hitler's definition with the word team.” He asks, can a team, whether in sports or other realms, achieve greatness without the concepts described? He answers, “It would be rather unlikely.”