TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Elon endorsed the speaker and campaigned for them. The speaker believes they would have won Pennsylvania easily, even if the "real governor" or Shapiro had run. The speaker is disappointed because Elon, who initially knew the bill's inner workings and had no problem with it, suddenly developed a problem when he learned about the EV mandate cut. This cut would save billions of dollars but is considered unfair. The speaker wants cars of all types, including electric, gasoline, combustion, and hybrids, and wants to be able to sell everything. Elon became "different" when Congress wanted to cut the EV mandate, which the speaker understands. Elon knew every aspect of the bill better than almost anybody.

The speaker expresses disappointment in Elon, claiming Elon knew the details of a bill "better than almost anybody" and initially had no problem with it. The speaker suggests Elon's problem arose when the EV mandate was cut, costing billions. The speaker wants various car types available, including electric, gasoline combustion, and hybrids. The speaker claims Elon made positive statements about them previously. The speaker states they helped Elon a lot. A second speaker asks if Elon raised concerns privately before making them public.

Elon is a patriot who is saving America and cutting the cause. He supported me in the election, but has never asked me for anything. I got rid of the electric car mandate, which may not be good for him. I got activated last week when I saw what they're doing to him. He makes an incredible product and people should support him. If he wasn't doing this, he wouldn't have any of these difficulties. Pam has done a great job with regard to all of the investigations that are going on. She already found four of them. They're really terrorists at a high level and the people that are financing them are in big trouble, so they better cut it out.

The speaker believes they would have easily won Pennsylvania, and is disappointed in Elon, who initially endorsed them and knew the details of a bill. Elon only developed a problem with the bill when the EV mandate was cut due to its high cost. The speaker wants cars of all types to be available, including electric, gasoline combustion, and hybrids. Elon knew every aspect of the bill and initially had no problem with it. The speaker helped Elon a lot. The speaker clarifies that Elon did not raise concerns privately before going public. The speaker believes Elon misses being in the Oval Office and that people who leave the administration sometimes become hostile due to "Trump derangement syndrome" or missing the glamour.

The speaker says he has always liked Elon Musk and is surprised by Musk's criticism regarding the bill. He would rather Musk criticize him than the bill because the bill is incredible, with $1.6 trillion in cuts, the biggest tax cut in history. The bill includes unbelievable benefits for small businesses, people, and middle-income individuals. Musk is upset because the EV mandate, which provided a lot of money for electric vehicles, was removed. Electric vehicle companies are having a hard time and want billions of dollars in subsidies. The speaker claims Musk knew about this from the beginning, and it hasn't changed.

The media and punditry threw everything they had at me, but they didn't win. Now they want to drive a wedge between Elon and me, even suggesting I've ceded control of the presidency to him. But it's so obvious what they're doing. They're not even good at it. If they were, I never would have become president. I get 98% bad publicity, but the people are smart. They see what's happening.

**Speaker 0:** Regarding tariff revenue, President Trump considered replacing income tax with it, especially to cut waste, fraud, and abuse. Is that a possibility? Also, considering Elon Musk, isn't one of Doge's objectives to get rid of the federal bureaucracy? Who was really running the White House when Joe Biden was in office? **Speaker 1:** China tariff revenue could bring in between $500 billion and $1 trillion over ten years. We expect this tariff revenue will make it much easier for Republicans to pass a bill. **Speaker 2:** Many people failed to cover the fact that Joe Biden was mentally incompetent and was not running the country. A president is elected by the whole American people. The existential threat to democracy is the unelected bureaucracy of lifetime tenured civil servants who believe they answer to no one. President Trump is removing federal bureaucrats who are defying democracy by failing to implement his lawful orders.

Democrats may have alienated Elon Musk on a personal level by failing to celebrate his achievements, such as Starlink and private space endeavors. One speaker believes Democrats should have celebrated Musk's contributions to electric vehicles, even though he opposed unionization. Musk was reportedly offended when he wasn't invited to an EV summit. One speaker called the White House to inquire, and was told the union issue was likely the reason for the snub. The speaker felt he deserved credit and should have been invited. One speaker thinks Musk should stay off Twitter, but also notes that he was once an Obama supporter. Democrats should remember their history of celebrating innovation and entrepreneurship.

The speaker thanks Elon for his tremendous help and for opening people's eyes to what could be done. He states that the vast majority of people in the country respect and appreciate Elon. The speaker mentions $150,000,000, then corrects it to $160,000,000, suggesting the amount could double or triple as more things are being worked on that aren't yet counted. The speaker reiterates that Elon has done a fantastic job and expresses appreciation. He also thanks the cabinet, saying it's great to work with them.

So, I went off-script a bit tonight, and some folks walked out, but let me set the record straight on a few things. The economy I inherited wasn't a disaster, despite what some might say. Social Security isn't paying out to centuries-old people, and CEOs aren't thrilled about my tariffs. Ford's CEO thinks they'll devastate the auto industry. We've committed less to Ukraine's defense than Europe has, and Biden didn't close a bunch of power plants. Oil and gas production actually hit records under him. Even Doge hasn't claimed the huge savings some attribute to them, and cutting pediatric cancer research, then praising a young cancer survivor? That's just wrong. Oh, and I admitted Elon Musk heads Doge, which might cause some legal issues down the road. Also, about those tariffs, despite my efforts, everyone knows that the costs fall on the consumers.

The speaker asserts that financial systems face unprecedented risks due to economic chaos from President Trump and Elon Musk. Another speaker states that Trump ran on curbing wasteful spending, citing the $36 trillion national debt as fiscally and morally irresponsible. They claim Trump is the final decision-maker, contrasting this with the previous administration where key decisions were allegedly made by others, possibly during the president's "afternoon nap time." The speaker suggests labeling figures like Jake Sullivan, Ron Klain, and Jill Biden as "co-presidents" during that time and calls for honesty regarding past and present events.

Elon endorsed me and campaigned for me, and I would have easily won Pennsylvania, even against Shapiro. Elon knew the bill's inner workings better than anyone and initially had no problem with it. His problem arose when the EV mandate was cut due to its cost. I want cars of all types, including electric, gasoline combustion, and hybrids. Elon knew every aspect of the bill and only developed a problem after the cut. He previously said beautiful things about me. I'm disappointed in Elon, as I've helped him a lot. He worked hard and did a good job, but I think he misses the Oval Office. People leave my administration and initially love us, but then they miss it and sometimes become hostile. It's like Trump derangement syndrome. They wake up and the glamour is gone, and they become hostile.

The speaker expresses disappointment in Elon, stating that Elon previously said "the most beautiful things" about them. The speaker claims to have helped Elon and asserts that Elon was very knowledgeable about the details of a particular bill and initially had no issues with it. According to the speaker, Elon's opposition arose only when he learned about the planned reduction of the EV mandate, which the speaker says involves billions of dollars. The speaker states the desire to have cars of all types.

The speaker claims a previously "great relationship" with Elon has soured due to disagreements over the "great big beautiful bill." He asserts the bill, featuring the "biggest tax cuts in history," will generate a surplus if tariff revenue is included, citing a minimum of $2.8 trillion over ten years, even according to the "Democrat"-run CBO. He touts low inflation (around 2%) and falling gasoline and grocery prices (specifically eggs), attributing past high inflation to the Biden administration's energy policies. The border is now "the best in the history of our country," with only a few legal entrants recently. The speaker expresses disappointment in Elon's changed stance on the bill, suggesting it stemmed from cuts to the EV mandate, which Elon previously understood and supported. He speculates that people who leave his administration often become "hostile" due to missing the "glamour" and "beautiful Oval Office."

Speaker 0 states that rhetoric makes politicians less than human. Speaker 1 believes Democrats lost Elon Musk because they didn't celebrate his contributions to electric vehicles, Starlink, and private space endeavors, even though he was against unionization. Speaker 2 says he received a call from Musk about not being invited to an EV summit and called the White House to ask why. He felt Musk should have been invited and that the union issue was the reason for the snub. Speaker 1 agrees he deserved credit. Speaker 1 thinks Musk should stay off Twitter and not make jokes about the Vice President. Speaker 1 says Democrats should remember that Musk supported Obama and that the Democratic party should be about innovation and entrepreneurship.

When the speaker came into office, he told Elon Musk "we gotta get them out" referring to astronauts stranded for nine months. The speaker claims Biden abandoned them and was embarrassed by what happened, implying the situation could have been resolved sooner. He credits Elon Musk's genius for bringing them back. The speaker believes people who hate Elon also hate the country, but says there are more people who love the country now more than ever. He calls MAGA and America First the greatest movement in the history of politics. The astronauts will not immediately visit the White House because they need to recover from the effects of being in space without gravity. After they get better, they will come to the Oval Office.

The speaker was asked if they would get rid of the Tesla and Starlink service at the White House. The speaker responded no, stating they may move the Tesla around a little bit, but that Starlink is a good service. When asked where they would move the Tesla, the speaker said they have a lot of locations. The speaker was then asked if they ever saw Elon Musk get physical with the treasury secretary. The speaker responded no, stating they had an argument, but didn't see any physicality. The speaker was then asked about a New York Times report alleging that Elon Musk was blurring the lines between recreational use of drugs and medicinal use towards the end of his time in the White House, and whether the speaker thought Musk ever had drugs at the White House. The speaker responded that they didn't know, and hoped not, wishing Musk well and stating they had a good relationship.

Elon and the speaker had a great relationship, though the current status is uncertain. The speaker recalls a wonderful send-off where Elon said very nice and the "best" things. Elon wore the hat. The speaker believes Trump was right about everything. The speaker also believes they are right about the "great big beautiful bill," which they describe as the biggest tax cuts in history and the biggest economic development moves anywhere. They claim nothing like it has ever been done before.

The speaker credits the president for allowing Elon to bring in a team of young geniuses to analyze departments and cut spending. They reportedly identified $160 billion in potential annual administrative cuts. However, congressional approval is needed to implement these cuts. The speaker acknowledges that some Republicans are not in favor of the level of austerity required to enact these cuts.

All the other side wants to talk about is Elon Musk, but where were they when Fauci was forcing vaccine and mask mandates? Or when Mayorkas was letting illegal aliens invade our country? Or when Cardona was targeting those who disagreed with his transgender ideology? Or when Gensler was blocking financial market growth? They didn't care because it benefited them. Musk is an employee of the President, and we have a mandate to do what he's doing. His job is to carry out the will of the people. The Democrats have grown and weaponized the administrative state, and people are fed up. We're talking about $2.7 trillion in improper payments since 2003, possibly the biggest money laundering scandal ever, and the other side doesn't care. Is it because this money funds their side? It funds media outlets that cover for them, left-wing NGOs, and transgender activism. This money, taken from Americans, is being used against them.

The speaker credits the president for allowing Elon to bring in a team of young geniuses to analyze departments and cut spending. They reportedly identified $160 billion a year in administrative cuts. However, these cuts require congressional approval. The speaker acknowledges that some Republicans are soft on spending, making it difficult to achieve the desired austerity and cuts.

Speaker 0 expresses disappointment in Elon, stating, "I've helped Elon a lot." Speaker 1 asks if Elon raised concerns privately before making them public and questions whether Elon should be taken seriously about spending cuts, given his role in that area. Speaker 0 responds that Elon worked hard and did a good job, suggesting Elon misses his former position, noting the unique appeal of the Oval Office.

The speaker discusses the public feud between Elon Musk and Donald Trump, emphasizing their contributions to saving civilization. Musk is credited with liberating speech through his acquisition of Twitter/X, while Trump is recognized for building an unprecedented political movement. Despite the feud, reconciliation is anticipated due to shared goals. The conflict stems from Trump's stance on a bill focused on no tax on tips, border security, ICE agent growth, energy independence, tax on remittances, asylum claim fees, and financing mass deportations. Although the bill cuts $1.6 trillion, the speaker acknowledges the challenges of a narrow House majority. The speaker dismisses the idea of a new political party proposed by Musk, asserting that unity, not division, is the solution. The focus should be on building a working-class movement and uniting against leftism, socialism, Marxism, and open borders. The speaker hopes Trump disengages from the feud and that Musk will support the existing movement.

Elon is a patriot who is saving America and has been unfairly treated. He supported me in the election and has never asked me for anything. I got rid of the electric car mandate, which might not be good for him. I got activated last week when I saw what they're doing to him and decided to support him because he makes an incredible product. Pam has done a great job with the investigations and has already found four of them. Those people are terrorists at a high level, and the people financing them are in big trouble and better cut it out.