reSee.it - Related Video Feed

As a child, the speaker received three vaccines. By 1986, children received 11 doses of five vaccines. Now, children in states with mandates may receive 69 to 92 vaccines between conception and age 18, with varying dose requirements depending on the brand. Each vaccine is designed to permanently alter the immune system. The speaker believes this contributes to an epidemic of immune dysregulation. The speaker suggests vaccines could be a key culprit in the rise of diseases like diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, seizure disorders, ADD, ADHD, speech delay, language delay, tics, Tourette's syndrome, narcolepsy, and autism, which the speaker claims were rare in their childhood. The speaker believes this generation is damaged by these diseases.

The Pfizer shot contains synthetic messenger RNA that stays in the body indefinitely, unable to be detoxed. It destroys toll-like receptors 3, 7, and 8, which are crucial for our immune system's defense against viruses and bacteria. This makes vaccinated individuals more susceptible to COVID-19. The spike protein from the shot enters the cell nucleus, binds to DNA, and blocks repair enzymes, potentially leading to cancer. There is evidence of an increase in cancer cases among vaccinated individuals. Multiple shots further weaken the immune system, with German data suggesting that by the end of 2022, fully vaccinated individuals over 30 may have immune suppression similar to AIDS.

Speaker 0 reports that the largest oncologic safety assessment of the COVID shots was just published in OncoTarget, a major cancer journal. They say the article was hit with cyberattacks just before publication, preventing online posting, and that the FBI was contacted. The piece then appeared in PubMed, but is described as having gone down again after another cyberattack on the journal. The core findings, as claimed, are that the researchers collected all of the cancer evidence associated with the COVID shots and found over three hundred confirmed vaccine-related cancer cases documented in peer-reviewed literature. This number is described as not representing the total seen in real-world data, but rather the count of cases identified by scientists within peer-reviewed sources, thereby supporting the claim that the phenomenon is real. The cancers span every type imaginable, with lymphoma accounting for about forty percent of the cases. Two large population-level studies are highlighted, totaling about ten million people. These studies reportedly show a major increased risk of multiple cancers in vaccinated populations compared to unvaccinated populations, with up to seven types of cancers increased. A military dataset consisting of around 1.2 million people is cited, in which lymphoma was reported to have increased drastically in 2021 among military members who were mandated to receive the shots. The summary characterizes the paper as so damning that it is presented as evidence that these shots are carcinogenic, and attributes the cyberattacks and other online disruptions to efforts to suppress these findings. The speaker emphasizes the sequence of cyber warfare activity around publication, the breadth of cancer types reported, and the notable increases in cancer incidence in large vaccinated populations, including a significant rise in lymphoma within the military cohort.

Speaker 0/J: The discussion centers on a study with dramatic implications, including claims that publishing such data could be career-ending, and questions about why the data would be so catastrophic. Speaker 2: The study involved eighteen thousand four hundred sixty eight subjects, of which one thousand nine hundred fifty seven were fully unvaccinated. When comparing the health outcomes of the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated, they found an increased risk in the vaccinated of several chronic health conditions. The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis—specifically four point two nine times in the adjusted analysis—and they note there are studies showing a range from three point two six to five point six five. Speaker 1: They also found three times the risk for atopic diseases. Speaker 2: Atopic diseases are described as a subset of allergic diseases. Speaker 1: They found an almost six times risk for autoimmune disease. Speaker 3: The autoimmune diseases this paper looked at include thrombocytopenic purpura, rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus, MS, multiple sclerosis, and Guillain Barre syndrome. They mention there are over 80 different autoimmune diseases, and their data showed for autoimmunity a six times increase in those who got vaccines when compared to the unvaccinated. Speaker 2: This is presented as staggering because autoimmune disorders represent significant morbidity and health costs and suffering accrued over a lifetime. Neurodevelopmental disorders are also discussed. Speaker 0: What kind numbers we talked about? Do you remember? Speaker 1: Five and a half times risk for neurodevelopmental disorders. Speaker 2: They state the immune system is intimately connected with both brain development and brain functioning, and so when the immune system gets triggered by illness, potentially by vaccination, you can get neuropsychiatric symptoms presumably related to brain inflammation and immune processes in the brain. Speaker 0: Two point nine two times the amount of motor disabilities, four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated, Speaker 3: Three times the rate of developmental delay. They found the same patterns as with allergy and autoimmunity. Also, six times more acute and chronic ear infections. Speaker 2: Interestingly, there were several health conditions where they couldn't even do this analysis because there were none in the unvaccinated group. The mathematical formulas require non-zero counts in both groups to compare risk. Speaker 1: For example, there were two sixty two children who had ADHD in the vaccinated group. Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero cases of ADHD. Speaker 3: These results are described as mind boggling. Conditions were not found at all in almost two thousand unvaccinated kids: zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities in the unvaccinated.

The speaker discusses potential risks associated with the COVID-19 vaccine, including its potential to suppress the immune system and reactivate latent viral infections. They mention a scientific journal, The Lancet, which released a study showing that immune function among vaccinated individuals was lower than that of unvaccinated individuals. The speaker expresses sympathy for those who may have been misled or forced to take the vaccine. They also highlight data from The Lancet's study, revealing a higher rate of medical incidents among double-vaccinated individuals aged around 80 compared to the unvaccinated. The speaker questions why this finding is not receiving more attention.

The speaker discusses a hypothesis regarding the connection between COVID-19 and the vaccines. They mention that SARS-CoV-2 was a product of dual-use research and that the spike protein in the vaccines is also from SARS-CoV-2. They explain that some people who received multiple vaccine shots experienced an interesting effect called IgG 4, which turns down the immune response. The speaker suggests that if the vaccines induce this attenuation signal, it could potentially make a population less reactive to a pathogen. They note that the Chinese did not use mRNA vaccines like other countries, which could mean that populations are now different in terms of their immune response. The speaker acknowledges that this is only a hypothesis and lacks evidence. They also express concerns about the widespread vaccination efforts and the unknown long-term impacts.

Studies show that more people who received the injections are ending up in the hospital and dying. Repeat injections can lead to tolerance issues by the immune system, preventing an effective immune response. The speaker is focused on the damages caused by these products and believes that the voices of the injured have been taken away. They hypothesize that the spike protein in the injections could cause hyper inflammation, especially in people with preexisting conditions. The speaker also mentions that the contents of the injection were supposed to remain at the injection site, but evidence suggests they can travel to the ovaries. They suspect that there is information being withheld from the public.

The speakers express concerns about the COVID-19 vaccine and its potential negative effects on the immune system. They mention a decrease in killer T cells and an increase in herpes family viruses, shingles, and human papillomavirus. They also note a rise in molluscum contagiosum and various types of cancer, such as endometrial and melanoma. The vaccine is said to alter immune function by reproducing the toxic spike protein. The speakers refer to data showing a doubling of diseases like acute kidney injury, liver injury, and thrombosis in 2021, despite low COVID-19 cases. They argue that these illnesses are not solely due to COVID-19 or long COVID.

The speaker claims that the COVID-19 vaccine decreases white blood cell production by 50% after the first dose and an additional 25% after the second dose. They also mention that the booster shot contains 81 strands of foreign bacteria and 8 strands of HIV, which supposedly shuts off the body's ability to produce white blood cells. The speaker suggests that this leads to chronic inflammation in areas where individuals have preexisting health issues. They state that 20 to 30% of the population will die during each series of this vaccination process. The speaker concludes by implying that pharmaceutical companies are seeking population control and long-term customers.

The speaker discusses how the spike protein in vaccines can lead to clotting issues, immune suppression, and reactivation of latent viruses like mono. This can also weaken the body's ability to fight off other viruses and cancers. An increase in cancer cases post-vaccination is noted anecdotally. The speaker attributes these effects to the spike protein in the vaccines.

As a child, the speaker received three vaccines; by 1986, children received 11 doses of five vaccines. Now, children in states with mandates may receive 69 to 92 vaccines between conception and age 18, with varying dose requirements depending on the brand. Each vaccine is designed to permanently alter the immune system. The speaker believes this contributes to an epidemic of immune dysregulation. The speaker claims there is a rise in diseases like diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, seizure disorders, ADD, ADHD, speech delay, language delay, tics, Tourette's syndrome, narcolepsy, and autism, which they rarely saw as a child, suggesting this generation is damaged by these diseases.

The speakers express concerns about the COVID-19 vaccine's impact on the immune system. They believe that the vaccine may lead to chronic diseases and permanently alter the immune system. They mention a drop in killer T cells and an increase in herpes family viruses, shingles, and human papillomavirus. They also note an increase in molluscum contagiosum and endometrial cancers. The vaccine is said to weaken the immune system and redirect cellular activity. The speakers reference data showing a doubling of diseases in categories such as acute kidney and liver injury, myo and pericarditis, and thrombosis. They argue that these illnesses are not solely due to COVID-19.

An outside expert analyzed data from 2,700 vaccinated and 560 unvaccinated patients in a medical practice. The study found that vaccinated patients had higher rates of asthma, allergic rhinitis, eczema, sinusitis, gastroenteritis, respiratory infections, otitis media, conjunctivitis, breathing issues, and behavioral issues like ADD and ADHD. The speaker claims that vaccines can shift the immune system towards allergy and autoimmunity, leading to more infections. The medical board responded by revoking the speaker's license. The speaker argues that the association between vaccines and health issues is not a coincidence, citing other studies and mechanisms of action like aluminum toxicity and immune activation from too many vaccines.

The transcript argues that more dangerous SARS-CoV-2 variants could arise by creating biological niches for variants and through VADES, with the speaker stating that “viral immune escape threatens to play a catastrophic role in the COVID mass vaccinated world.” It describes the virus as originally relatively harmless with a very low death percentage for healthy young people, potentially evolving into a seasonal virus with an even lower death percentage. However, it is claimed that mass vaccination could disturb this natural progression and cause resistant, and potentially more dangerous and more contagious variants by creating biological niches for those variants. The speaker asserts a correlation between the rise of variants and the increase of vaccinations, stating that “the rise of variants correlates with the increase of vaccinations.” In this context, viral immune escape is mentioned, and antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) is noted as a phenomenon that can worsen disease; the speaker notes that ADE is known to be an issue with coronaviruses and was an issue in animal trials for SARS vaccines, and is associated with SARS and severe COVID itself. The claim is made that as more vaccines and different vaccine types are administered, and as more COVID variants succeed, the ADE risk increases. According to the speaker, given these considerations, the worldwide mass vaccination agenda is described as a “haste and rush agenda,” very dangerous and destined to become a failure. The speaker questions whether “the mass vaccination induced immune escape COVID killing waves and vades” are coming for the COVID vaccinated. To illustrate the situation, the transcript cites a series of record-high stretcher occupancy values in Quebec, across several dates in 2024: 07/08/2024 – 2,319; 07/08/2024 – 2,370; 08/06/2024 – 2,384; 08/27/2024 – 2,395; 08/24/24 – 2,412; 09/03/2024 – 2,444. The source cited is Sourcetumia.org, with a request to “please like and follow.”

The speaker cites two population studies on COVID-19 vaccines and cancer risk, claiming they show massive increases in multiple cancers. The first study, from Italy, followed 300,000 Italians for about 30 months and reported about a 23 percent increased risk of overall cancer hospitalizations, with increases of about 40 to 60 percent in breast cancer hospitalizations, colorectal cancer, bladder cancer, and leukemia/lymphoma. A new study from South Korea, involving over eight million Koreans, purportedly corroborates the Italian data and expands on it. It reports about a 26 percent increase in overall cancer risk and increases across six major types of cancer, including gastric, thyroid, colorectal, and breast cancer, as well as other cancers described as very rare. The speaker frames these findings as an absolute disaster and claims they confirm that the vaccines have unleashed a turbo cancer epidemic. They state that the datasets corroborate these results and that the observed effects can be explained by gene expression chaos documented in other studies, along with genomic integration observed in stage four cancer patients. The speaker characterizes the situation as a disaster that needs immediate acknowledgment.

The speaker discusses potential risks associated with COVID-19 vaccines, including the suppression of the immune system and the reactivation of latent viral infections. They mention a study published in The Lancet that found lower immune function in vaccinated individuals compared to the unvaccinated. The speaker expresses sympathy for those who may have been harmed by being forced to take the vaccine. They also highlight data from the study showing a higher rate of medical incidents, including hospitalizations or death, among double-vaccinated individuals aged around 80 compared to the unvaccinated. The speaker questions why this finding is not receiving more attention.

The speaker describes a cascade of harms from mRNA injections, asserting that different individuals experience a variety of issues because the injections initiate chaos at the transcriptomic level. A recent study is cited as proof, noting that the process regulates thousands of gene expressions that are critical for immune regulation and mitochondrial function, and it purportedly invokes cancerous activity by suppressing tumor suppressor genes p53 and BRCA. The speaker says this occurs at the transcriptomic level, and references another study from the prior week that shows proteomically that the proteins produced from the dysregulated transcription are defective, contributing to a range of issues. Moving up to the next tier in the cascade, the speaker describes biochemical changes following injection. After vaccination, there are elevated inflammatory markers such as CRP, and increases in BNP and various cardiac enzymes, which are presented as indications of cardiac damage. The implication is that these biochemical changes reflect downstream harms. At the final tier, the speaker connects these molecular and biochemical disturbances to clinical outcomes. The claimed clinical harms include myocarditis, clotting syndrome, strokes, and cancers. The overall narrative is that the mRNA injections initiate a multi-tier cascade—from transcriptomic disruptions affecting gene regulation, immune function, and mitochondrial activity, through proteomic consequences with defective proteins, to biochemical signals of inflammation and cardiac injury, culminating in a range of clinical conditions. The speaker emphasizes that the referenced studies are either recent or in progress. One study is described as having been “proved” and is on the preprint server undergoing peer review, while another study is noted as having appeared “last week,” illustrating the progression from transcriptomic changes to proteomic outcomes. The sequence of claims is structured as a tiered pathway—transcriptomic, proteomic, biochemical, and clinical—culminating in diverse harms observed in some vaccinated individuals, with the assertion that the effects vary by person due to the initial chaotic molecular changes. The clinical spectrum listed includes myocarditis, clotting syndrome, strokes, and cancers, linked to the preceding molecular and biochemical alterations.

The speaker claims that the COVID-19 vaccine decreases white blood cell production by 50% after the first dose and an additional 25% after the second dose. They also mention that the booster shot contains 81 strands of foreign bacteria and 8 strands of HIV, which supposedly shuts off the body's ability to produce white blood cells. The speaker suggests that this leads to chronic inflammation in areas where individuals have preexisting health issues. They state that 20 to 30% of the population will die during each series of this vaccination process. The speaker concludes by implying that pharmaceutical companies are seeking population control and long-term customers.

The speaker asserts that COVID-19 shots do more than affect the immune system; they can damage the brain and worsen mental health. They claim a wave of studies shows sharp increases in various strokes: ischemic strokes up to 44%, hemorrhagic strokes up to 50%, and transient ischemic attacks (mini strokes) up to 67%. They also report increases in neurological and autoimmune conditions, including myasthenia gravis up 71% and Alzheimer’s disease up 22%. Cognitive impairment is claimed to have risen by nearly 138%, while depression is up 68%, anxiety disorders up 44%, and sleep disorders up 93%. The speaker links all of these increases to “toxic spike protein accumulation and persistence in the brain.” The speaker states this is not a conspiracy theory and cites what they describe as documented peer‑reviewed research and studies by experts. They name epidemiologist Nicholas Holcher, who allegedly says that using mRNA to hijack cells in various organ systems to produce a highly toxic spike protein that persists in the body for months or years was “one of the worst ideas in medical history.” The speaker then asks, “So what can you do?” as a transition to presumably recommendations or actions, though no specific actions are listed in the provided segment.

The speaker analyzed office visits, stratifying patients by the number of vaccines received. The study included over 500 unvaccinated and over 3,700 vaccinated individuals. The data revealed that more vaccines correlated with worse health outcomes over a ten-and-a-half-year period. Specifically, the speaker claims that increased vaccination was associated with higher rates of infections, ADD/ADHD, neurodevelopmental issues, eczema, allergies, and anemia. According to the speaker, these negative correlations were observed when comparing vaccinated individuals to the unvaccinated group. The speaker states that within five days of the data being available online, the Oregon Medical Board suspended their license on December 3, 2020, citing them as a threat.

The speaker claims that the COVID-19 vaccine decreases white blood cell production by 50% after the first dose and an additional 25% after the second dose. They also mention that the booster shot contains 81 strands of foreign bacteria and 8 strands of HIV, which supposedly shuts off the body's ability to produce white blood cells. The speaker suggests that this leads to chronic inflammation in areas where individuals have preexisting health issues. They state that 20 to 30% of the population will die during each series of this vaccination process, and big pharma benefits from the boosters by creating a dependency on them. The speaker advises listeners to critically think and wait for 2 to 3 years before getting vaccinated.

The Pfizer shot contains synthetic messenger RNA that stays in the body and cannot be detoxed. It destroys toll-like receptors 3, 7, and 8, which are crucial for our immune system's defense against viruses and bacteria. This makes vaccinated individuals more susceptible to getting COVID-19. The spike protein from the shot enters the cell nucleus, binds to DNA, and can cause abnormal cell replication leading to cancer. People who have received the shot are experiencing an increase in various types of cancer. Recent data shows that those who are vaccinated are 8.12 times more likely to be infected with the Omicron variant. The more shots received, the more the immune system is suppressed, potentially leading to vaccine-induced immune suppressed AIDS. This information is based on government data from Germany.

The speaker explains that the Pfizer shot is designed so that its messenger RNA enters cells and can be replicated indefinitely by ribosomes, so it “cannot get it out of your body,” and there is “no detoxing from it.” The speaker says that although the body can be detoxed or made healthier overall, it is not possible to eliminate the spike protein, antibodies to spike protein, or advocated monoclonal antibodies. The speaker claims that the presence of spike proteins “sensitize your dendritic cells and your b cells,” and that “those spikes are gonna be there probably forever.” A central claim is that messenger RNA “ablates, wipes out, destroys Toll like receptor three, seven, and eight.” The speaker describes Toll-like receptors as “God inside our body,” “radars” that constantly patrol to get rid of viruses, bacteria, and things that do not belong, and as the “innate, God given” immune system present from birth. The speaker asserts that destroying Toll-like receptors 3, 7, and 8 makes people “more susceptible to getting COVID,” and claims this is why people “that get the shots suddenly are sick.” The speaker further says doctors “are illiterate and not reading” the mechanisms. The speaker adds that in hospital settings, people treated with remdesivir and placed on a ventilator have “greater than eighty percent mortality rate.” The speaker frames this as part of a known mechanism: spike proteins enter the nucleus of cells and “bind to our DNA.” The speaker states that any claim that the spike proteins do not irreversibly bind DNA is wrong, and says the binding “blocks the door,” converting the cell into an abnormal cell that “if that cell replicates, will turn into cancer.” The speaker also claims that spike binding prevents “our God given immune system repair enzymes” from repairing the damage, allowing cancer to form. The speaker links this to a “explosion of cancer in people that get these shots,” including people who were in remission and later experience cancer returning or worsening, and mentions endometrial cancer and “all kinds of blood cancers, lymphatic cancers, breast cancers.” The speaker refers to doctor Ryan Cole discussing this. The speaker also cites recent data, stating that a person “is injected” and is then “eight point one two times more likely to be infected with Omicron.” The speaker concludes by asserting that repeated shots further suppress the immune system: the more shots, the more “destroy your immune system” and the faster it happens. The speaker then claims that “German data” says that by the end of 2022, every fully vaccinated person over age 30 may have the equivalent of “full blown vaccine induced

Speaker 0 argues that, when re-examining the data from the original study, the raw numbers reveal a different pattern than what the study’s modeling suggested. Specifically, they state that, in the raw proportions, every single one of the 22 chronic disease categories was proportionally higher in the vaccinated group. This includes cancer, which the study reportedly treated as a control condition and claimed there was no difference for. According to Speaker 0, the study’s use of cancer as a control is at odds with the raw data they observed. They claim that there was a difference in cancer outcomes, contrary to the study’s implication of no difference. They emphasize that, with rare outcomes, the modeling employed in the original analysis is not very reliable, and as a result, the study did not perform any basic proportional analysis. Speaker 0 states that when they performed a basic proportional analysis themselves, cancer was fifty-four percent higher in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated children. They mention that this result is “explained biologically” and assert that there is biological plausibility behind it. Key points: - Raw proportions show all 22 chronic disease categories higher in the vaccinated group, including cancer. - The original study used cancer as a control and claimed no difference, which Speaker 0 disputes based on the raw data. - Modeling for rare outcomes is described as not very reliable. - A basic proportional analysis by Speaker 0 indicates cancer is 54% higher in the vaccinated group versus the unvaccinated. - A biological explanation or plausibility is asserted for the observed cancer difference in the vaccinated group.

The first vaccine decreases white blood cell production by 50%. The second dose, given eight weeks later, decreases saline while increasing harmful ingredients, further attacking white blood cell production by another 25%, leaving only 25% functionality. The booster contains 81 strands of foreign bacteria that the body can't fight effectively due to the reduced white blood cell production, leading to chronic inflammation in areas of predisposition, such as gut health, respiratory issues, or pre-existing conditions. This puts the body in a constant state of fight or flight with low immunity. The second booster contains eight strands of HIV, which shuts off the ability to make white blood cells, mirroring the effects of the disease itself. People are left with no immune system, foreign bacteria, HIV strains, and other harmful ingredients.