reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker explains why they didn't speak up earlier and expresses frustration with the lack of action taken regarding the election. They mention bringing in General Flynn and Sydney Powell to meet with the president, but faced obstacles. The speaker confirms rumors that Powell was kept away from the president. They also mention the need for a legitimate audit of the election.

The speaker explains that a series of laws allowed the military to take over vaccine distribution without any clinical trials or safety testing. The safety testing conducted by the pharmaceutical industry was just for show and had no regulatory implications. The FDA, which is responsible for regulating medical products, does not have the authority to regulate these countermeasures. The legal framework being used pretends that these are health products when they are actually in a different legal space.

The speaker discusses the structure and operations of a criminal cartel involving government, pharma, and the military. They explain how the Department of Defense in the US orders COVID products, including vaccines, under a contracting framework that allows them to bypass regulations and maintain secrecy. They highlight the significance of declaring a pandemic or public health emergency, which exempts these products from pharmaceutical regulations. The speaker accuses the government, pharmaceutical companies, and other entities of collaborating in a model of fascism. They also suggest that the COVID vaccines are ineffective and dangerous, leading to deaths and other adverse effects. They call for investigations and legal action against the perpetrators.

Speaker asserts that "the state, however you define that, the military, CDC, Tony Fauci, Ralph Barack at the University of North Carolina created a weaponized virus. Correct? Gain of function research. They contracted it out to China, and it caused a pandemic around the world once it was released. The government created a weaponized virus that then got out and caused a global pandemic." They ask, "When are we gonna have accountability for that?" They seek accountability for "the COVID era," and for "the CDC has known since 1999 that vaccines cause autism, and they've covered it up for twenty six years." They ask, "How do we begin to have accountability?" and conclude, "You want to call it something different? Truth Commissions, criminal trials? You're I would love to comparing"

I am Chief Warrant Officer Duncan J. Searcy, claiming whistleblower status under Title 10 US Code 1034. After four years of seeking resolution through my chain of command and Congress, I have lost faith in my leaders. I refused the EUA COVID-19 vaccine, which led to being grounded, loss of pay, and benefits, causing severe financial hardship and personal struggles. The military's focus shifted to mental health issues to remove me. This situation reflects a larger issue of corruption and control by a ruling class. I urge Americans to unite peacefully to reclaim our rights and demand accountability from our leaders. I challenge fellow service members to renew their oaths and stand firm. Remember, your oath is to the Constitution, and you will answer for it. I pledge my support to the family of Lance Corporal Kareem Nakuy, who died during the Afghanistan withdrawal.

The speaker believes it is "shockingly unconstitutional" that Judge Mershant oversaw a trial given alleged illicit campaign money flowing through his family. The speaker is calling for subpoenas to be issued to Judge Mershant's daughter's company, which allegedly made over $15 million from information coming out of her father's courtroom. The speaker wants to see the company's bank records to determine where the money went, including how much went to the family before and after the "false conviction." The speaker also wants an investigation into FEC violations allegedly committed by the judge and his family. According to the speaker, America is calling for accountability in the judicial system, and Congress is the only entity that can provide it. The speaker hopes that members of Congress will issue subpoenas "ASAP."

The speakers frame a broad concern about control over resources and exposure to external interventions. Speaker 0 emphasizes individual agency in food-related choices: “I put into my mouth. I can control what I feed,” and notes that while people can decide how to grow their food and whether to spray pesticides, they cannot control “the experiments over my head.” They describe a sense of invasion and threat, stating, “Within an hour, it spreads out. It creates a blanket. We're in a war. This is a war against me, you, our children, our grandchildren, and generations to come. This is war raised upon us.” They claim the programs involve “spraying tons of patented aerosol balloons into our skies without public consent,” naming substances such as aluminum and barium, and assert these actions are “targeting your food, your water, and it's coming in multiple different ways.” When asked how to verify these claims, Speaker 1 mentions that “states have bills to ban it,” suggesting a political dimension to the issue. Speaker 0 expands on the political and legal landscape, stating that “I think there are now 32 states that have taken an attempt at this,” and that the issue has “become a huge issue.” They argue that if ordinary citizens knew “the truth of what's going on and what they're being exposed to without their consent,” they would be outraged and would take action. They call for accountability, declaring, “I don't want some creep ramming chemicals down my throat without my permission. We need to prosecute those people that are doing it.” The exchange also touches on strategy and momentum. Speaker 0 asks whether they should “stand in one spot and say enough is enough” and whether, if others don’t listen, they should “take it to the next step.” They reflect that they have been pursuing this issue “for a while,” indicating ongoing effort and persistence. Overall, the dialogue centers on perceived loss of individual control over exposure to environmental interventions, the belief in large-scale, covert aerosol programs, legislative responses at the state level, a call for accountability and prosecution, and the contemplation of continued collective action in response to what is described as an ongoing, war-like threat.

The US military is facing internal corruption and harm to its members due to unlawful actions by leadership, as highlighted in the Declaration of Military Accountability. Despite the COVID-19 vaccine mandate being rescinded, there has been no accountability for the harm caused. Organizers, including veteran Brad Miller, are calling for senior leaders to acknowledge the harm inflicted and restore those affected. This situation reflects a lack of regard for military readiness and civilian control, prompting a call for serious action to address these serious matters. The importance of free speech and virtue in society is emphasized.

The speaker discusses unethical government experiments, such as Project MKUltra and the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. They highlight how these projects violated human rights and caused lasting harm. The speaker questions the government's trustworthiness and calls for more accountability. They emphasize the need for awareness and action to prevent such injustices from happening again.

The speaker insists on a real inquiry into everything that happened during COVID-19, stating that those responsible must be held accountable, but currently are not. The speaker accuses authorities of wanting to move on from what they did during the "COVID hysteria," but the speaker believes their actions were not okay. They claim their charter of rights was not respected.

I discovered large quantities of aluminum, barium, and strontium in the computer system for approving hazardous materials. To confirm if these substances were being sprayed, I conducted air and soil sampling, which revealed high levels of contaminants. When I raised concerns with a new commander, they threatened to put me through a mental evaluation and questioned my well-being. This validated my belief that we were violating laws and harming people instead of protecting them. Despite the fear of punishment, I found the courage to speak out because in the military, we are just numbers and our lives are controlled.

There are military and law enforcement individuals frustrated with illegal operations they view as treasonous. This group has a long-term agenda that poses a serious threat. A legal fund is being established to sue corporations under the RICO Act, similar to actions taken against the mafia. There’s urgency for Congress to act quickly, but alternative measures are being pursued. Public pressure is essential; citizens should contact their representatives to advocate for open hearings and witness protection. Disturbingly, there are claims that this covert group has the capability to manipulate natural disasters, posing an existential threat to humanity. The speaker left a lucrative medical career to address these issues after uncovering the truth about these operations.

There are individuals in military and law enforcement who view certain operations as treasonous and illegal, planning to take legal action against corporations involved. They aim to push Congress for quicker action but are also pursuing legal avenues independently. The speaker emphasizes the danger posed by the organization's ability to stage events like fake alien invasions and manipulate geophysical phenomena. They stress the urgent need for public involvement in pressuring lawmakers to address these threats.

On December 15, 2021, the speaker filed an Article 138 against their chain of command for violating the law by administering experimental COVID-19 injections, which they claimed were dangerous to public health and safety. In response, the speaker was court-martialed under Article 92. The individual responsible for the court-martial then allegedly bragged about it on social media. This individual is now a House of Representatives member for District 7 Virginia. He sits on the House Armed Services Committee.

The speaker, a former bioenvironmental engineer in the US Air Force, likened their role to that of OSHA and the EPA, monitoring the military's environmental impact. While reviewing Air Force form 3952, used for hazardous material approvals, they found large quantities of aluminum, barium, and strontium oxides and sulfates. After asking questions, the speaker says they were moved to Warner Robins, Georgia, where they found the same materials. They conducted air and soil sampling, finding high levels of these contaminants. Upon further inquiry, a commander allegedly questioned their mental state and threatened a mental evaluation. The speaker believes this validated their concerns that laws were being violated and people were being poisoned. They consider geoengineering the number one issue, arguing that toxins from various sources, like fluoride and vaccines, are overwhelming people's bodies. Despite potential personal costs, the speaker is committed to speaking out.

Rachel Ortiz presents evidence of a biological weapon delivery system disguised as a random outbreak by the CDC and Canadian public health agency. She alleges treason under the US Constitution and suppression of information by authorities. Ortiz implicates various individuals and organizations in trafficking and money laundering activities. She urges action to address these issues. Another speaker expresses sympathy for Ortiz's experiences and offers to discuss further. They emphasize the need to prevent similar incidents in the future.

The speaker discusses the accountability and potential criminal liability of various individuals and organizations involved in the development and distribution of mRNA vaccines. They argue that both the Pentagon and the FDA are responsible for the creation of these vaccines, which they believe are harmful and potentially deadly. They also mention the involvement of Harvard Medical School and the CDC in offensive biological warfare research. The speaker suggests that the ultimate goal of these actions is population control and reduction. They share personal experiences of being ignored and threatened when attempting to raise concerns about these issues. The speaker concludes by emphasizing the importance of citizens reporting these assaults to their local law enforcement authorities.

In an open letter titled "Declaration of Military Accountability," 231 retired and active military service members express their concerns about the state of corruption and moral obligations within the armed forces. They accuse military leaders of breaking the law, violating constitutional rights, and suppressing religious freedom while implementing the COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The letter calls for accountability, restoration of trust, and the rebuilding of a moral society. The signatories pledge to hold leaders accountable through lawful means, including running for Congress, seeking executive branch appointments, and introducing legislation. They emphasize the importance of upholding the Constitution and fighting against a two-tiered justice system. The letter concludes with a plea for support and prayers in the battle for truth and justice.

I am Chief Warrant Officer Duncan J. Searcy, claiming whistleblower status. For four years, I've sought resolution through my chain of command but have lost faith in them. After refusing the EUA COVID-19 vaccine, I faced coercion, lost my pay and benefits, and struggled financially. I want accountability from my leaders and urge the American people to rise up peacefully against a corrupt ruling class that divides us for profit. I challenge my fellow service members to renew their oath to the Constitution and recognize the dangers of coercion. Your loyalty should be to the Constitution, not to those in power. I pledge any earnings from this video to the family of Lance Corporal Kareem Nakui, who died during the Afghanistan withdrawal. Together, we can reclaim our rights and work towards a better future.

The speaker insists on a real inquiry into everything that happened during COVID-19, stating those responsible must be held accountable, but currently are not. The speaker claims that authorities want to move on from their actions during the "COVID hysteria," but that this is unacceptable. They believe their charter of rights was not respected.

The speaker conducted investigations using air and soil sampling to test for contaminants. They discovered high levels of these contaminants and raised concerns to a new commander. The commander threatened the speaker with a mental evaluation and questioned their mental state. This validated the speaker's suspicions that laws were being violated and people were being poisoned instead of protected. Fearing repercussions, the speaker decided to leave the military and has been blowing the whistle ever since. The speaker's enlistment ended on October 27, 2010, but their efforts did not stop there.

The speaker discusses their motivation for filing a lawsuit against the director of the FBI and the former attorney general. They believe it is important to show Americans the potential misconduct happening to various individuals, including the Trump family and government officials. They express a desire to uncover the truth and reveal any unlawful surveillance by the FBI. The speaker suggests that the solution lies in sending Donald Trump back to the White House with a supportive team and regaining control over government actions. They also mention the need to impeach judges who they believe have acted unconstitutionally. The speaker acknowledges that this is a drastic measure but feels it is necessary based on their observations.

Our government is out of control on this, and they are lawless. They completely disregard bioethics. They completely disregard the federal common rule. They have broken all the rules that I know of, that I've been trained on for years and years and years. These mandates of an experimental vaccine are explicitly illegal. They are explicitly inconsistent with the Nuremberg Code. They're explicitly inconsistent with the Belmont Report. They are flat out illegal, and they don't care. And the only

A speaker addresses Tim Walz, claiming Walz said that troops in Afghanistan told him they were worried about their families' healthcare. The speaker asserts that in their four years of combat experience as a leader, no soldier ever expressed concern about their family's healthcare. The speaker accuses Walz of using combat experience he doesn't have to push a political agenda and lying to advance his career. The speaker hopes Walz faces stolen valor charges, alleging that these lies helped him and benefited him monetarily.

If Biden pardons Milley unlawfully, it should be challenged with a court martial. There are valid grounds for this action. Judicial Watch has initiated a lawsuit to investigate Milley’s involvement in a collusive attack on our freedoms during a meeting with Merrick Garland.