reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 thanks Joe for covering the antiques in the crowd. They ask if it feels better and offer to spray something.

The transcript presents a provocative exploration of allegations that the Smithsonian Institution is concealing real history. It frames the Smithsonian as a “nation’s attic” that holds vast quantities of artifacts—about 150,000,000 items across 19 museums—that, according to various reports, are removed from public view or hidden from the historical record. A central claim repeats a Phoenix Gazette article from 1909 describing two Smithsonian explorers who allegedly discovered a Grand Canyon cave filled with ancient Egyptian artifacts, Hindu and Buddhist items, and mummies. The article says an archaeologist named Jordan, supervised by another explorer named Kincaid, began excavating, with reports of a front-page scoop and claims that 109 truckloads of artifacts were removed “with very great difficulty” from the cavern system and that the contents were sent to Washington but “mysteriously vanish[ed] from the historical record.” The Smithsonian would later deny knowledge of these discoveries, and the Grand Canyon area in question is described as now off-limits. Support for these claims is tied to the presence of Egyptian-named features in the canyon—Isis Temple, Tower of Set, Tower of Ra—and to anecdotes that mummies and artifacts were stored in a secret vault. The discussion extends to the idea of a hidden warehouse where crucial discoveries—like the Ark of the Covenant in Raiders of the Lost Ark—are allegedly kept “top men” working on them, unseen by the public. The film analogy is used to illustrate how such a facility might exist and remain undisclosed. Another major thread concerns reports of giant skeletons found across the United States that were allegedly removed by the Smithsonian and never seen again. The dialogue cites discoveries from mound sites in Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Illinois, Ohio, Kentucky, New York, and beyond, describing skulls of unusually large size and skeletons up to seven or ten feet tall. The New York Times (in 1912) and various newspapers from the late 19th and early 20th centuries are referenced as having carried stories of “a hitherto unknown race” with exceptionally large skulls. Numerous witnesses recall that once such skeletons were found, Smithsonian investigators would quickly recover the remains and remove them to Washington, after which they disappeared from public view. Personal accounts from researchers, miners, and local observers are cited to support the claim that many giant remains were shipped to the Smithsonian and never returned. The speakers discuss why such artifacts might be hidden, suggesting that revealing them would challenge established histories and current political narratives. They propose that authentic finds could call into question conventional histories of North America and humanity, potentially undermining the status quo. The dialogue also contends that the control of history is tied to power and money, noting the Smithsonian’s funding structure—funded by tax dollars but heavily supported by private donations from charitable organizations such as the Gates Foundation—and suggesting that those in power may prefer to keep unsettling discoveries buried. Throughout, the speakers present a spectrum of testimonials, newspaper excerpts, and anecdotal evidence to argue that the Smithsonian may be withholding pieces of humanity’s past, including artifacts and giant skeletal remains, to preserve a particular historical narrative.

Speaker 0 recounts a perplexing detail from rookie season: there used to be trees between the electrical substation and the practice facility, and a fence with trees above it that had no leaves year-round. He notes there were a couple of leaf b uploads here and there, but it was mostly bare year after year. He didn’t point it out to coach Shanahan until 2021; a veteran pointed it out to him during his rookie year. This year, the NFL came in and cut down all the trees, so they’re no longer there, and no one can see them now. Only the veterans know that truth, and he believes no one has talked about it yet. He emphasizes that the absence of leaves on those trees messed him up, and he’s left wondering why there were no leaves.

I've visited this cave many times, usually just dropping off loads outside. Today, I need to go inside to drop something off, so I thought I'd bring you along. Wow, look at that entrance! I need to enter the code now. Inside, there are train tracks that stretch over 6 miles. I'm searching for door 371037, and Abram was skeptical about this cave. This place is massive, designed to store PPE and supplies for emergencies. It goes on forever! It was built over 30 years ago and took about 10 years to complete. Just look at these blast doors!

Can't wait to get home! Super Bowl LIX, second quarter: Eagles leading 10-0. It seems Kansas City's been down by 10 in every Super Bowl they've won. Time to test your singing voice, Tom! Seventy thousand people will join in. Might need a celebratory drink later, but not yet. Let's see the Chiefs' offense challenge the Eagles' defense.

Speaker 0 describes Skyler as having given about four different interviews online right after the Charlie Kirk assassination. She notes he is seen with glasses on top of his head, front row at the scene, and somehow sits on the Main Floor at the Charlie Kirk Memorial during the memorial service. She asks, “Who is this guy? How is this possible? And why are his interviews so odd?” She points out that on the day of the shooting Skyler was in the front row and near a bodyguard. Speaker 1 and Speaker 2 recount Skyler’s position: “Maybe 10 or 15 feet away when it happened. Close as he could.” They describe Skyler with sunglasses on his head, and a Charlie Kirk bodyguard in front of him, with Skyler off to the side in the corner when Charlie began taking questions. They note the bodyguard is directly in front of Charlie, Skyler to the side, matching Skyler’s own account of being “front row, Noel in front of him,” with a bodyguard to his left and one in front of him. They say Skyler was “front row and center.” Speaker 0 then says Skyler later appeared sitting on the Main Floor at the Charlie Kirk Memorial, with a floor pass for a press conference, literally “maybe 10 or so rows from the front of the stage.” They claim this is documented on Skyler’s Facebook page. They mention Skyler’s Facebook shows two, perhaps “two point, I think, k” followings, with from 2018 to 02/2025 only about seven posts and about 10 pictures, implying a sparse content profile for a “digital creator.” Speaker 3 describes Skyler’s earlier claim about getting into the stadium: “Just made it to the stadium. There is an unlimited amount of security, Secret service, military, police, empty. Steel barricades all around. … There’s been people waiting in line since 05:30 in the morning.” He says Skyler went past multiple security layers to obtain a media badge and a floor pass, and then ended up on the Main Floor “a few rows back to the Charlie Kirk Memorial.” The speakers question how he could gain access and yet appear to be late, then have a media pass and seating positions. Speaker 4 adds, “So, again, why go into detail acting as if you were late, you didn’t even know you were gonna get in, yet somehow you end up with a passing all these checkpoints to get a media pass around your deck, end up on the First, you know, Main Floor just a few rows back to the Charlie Kirk Memorial that day. It’s just like it’s a big act, a big show that this guy's putting on. It’s like he was handpicked to do all these interviews. He was handpicked to have front row that day because he was up, you know, farther up in the crowd before Charlie got there.” Speaker 4 closes with a segment featuring a clip of another person describing a mythic, imagery-laden interpretation: “An indecision night. I photoshopped in my mind. I photoshopped the blood away. I photoshopped Charlie, sat him back up, put his smile back on, and rewound the tape… I rewound the bullet going back up into the rifle. I stuck a flower inside the rifle.”

There's a commotion on the field! It looks like a koala, a dog, or something else. They're trying to catch it, using trash cans, but it's proving difficult. One person is even using a cart, but the creature is fast. It's incredibly hard to catch! Oh no, watch out for the door! Wow, that thing is unstoppable!

Speaker 2 states they have an underground tunnel on their ranch in Kauai. Speaker 1 jokes that it would be a good place to hide dope. Speaker 2 says the tunnel isn't that big and is more of an underground storage situation. Speaker 2 recalls posting a reel on Instagram of Priscilla making fun of them playing video games in the tunnel. Speaker 2 says that in Hawaii, an underground tunnel is like having a storm shelter. Speaker 2 believes the internet makes things seem crazier than they are. Speaker 1 asks if someone built the tunnel in Roblox. Speaker 2 thinks the tunnel is more related to Roblox than what it is.

The speaker claims that the NFL has a history of scripting and rigging the Super Bowl. They give examples like Tom Brady and the Patriots winning after 9/11 and the New Orleans Saints winning after Hurricane Katrina. They also mention the connection between the Rams and the Golden State Warriors winning in the same year. The speaker then focuses on the Kelsey brothers and their connection to Swift, suggesting a possible rematch between the Philadelphia Eagles and the Kansas City Chiefs tied to a global banking event. They believe this is not a coincidence but foreshadowing by the NFL.

Speaker 1 states they have an underground tunnel on their ranch in Kauai. It's described as more of an underground storage situation, a tunnel that goes to another building. Speaker 0 suggests it would be a good place to hide dope. Speaker 1 says the tunnel isn't that big and mentions a reel on Instagram of Priscilla making fun of him playing video games down there. Speaker 1 adds that the internet makes things seem crazier than they are, and in Hawaii, an underground tunnel is like having a storm shelter.

Speaker 0: We have made a lot of episodes, a 106 to this point, for a long time after today. This will be the episode that I referred to as the end of the mainstream narrative. An episode that we have built up to for a very long time. Welcome to 2025. I believe this is the perfect time to share this information with the world. So here we go. I asked their AI database, the AI ChatGPT, if there were any archaeological finds that have been removed from the public, removing evidence of a previous civilization that was here where we live today. The answer is shocking. Yes. There have been numerous instances where archaeological finds are removed from the public. All of us. Where statement number six is the final straw for the mainstream narrative. A narrative that is taught to all of us since day one. A narrative that is being taught in children's classrooms in every country stating controversial finds, items that could challenge established historical narratives, the mainstream narrative. These items might also be kept from public display doing this to avoid controversy or debate. For any mainstream historian, this is the end. And for any archaeologist, you are now exposed. And this is just the beginning today. In fact, it's just the beginning of a massive series that we are starting right now as we speak. I'm going to be referring back to this episode time and time again. And to this point in all of our episodes, I have never needed to read something more. This page in their book, will be the end of the story that we're all told and the beginning of free thinking, the beginning of finding the truth, stating, advocates argue that the public access to such artifacts is essential for a fuller understanding of our true history and for fostering critical thinking about the truth. Our world's true history, suppressing giants with some findings in The Americas that suggest advanced civilizations existed just like we've talked about before European contact, such as evidence of complex urban planning where the mainstream narrative, the mainstream archaeology dismisses it, which contributes to these artifacts that have been found not being displayed or discussed, hiding artifacts that would expose an advanced previous civilization, hiding them simply because it goes against the mainstream narrative is exactly what we're being told. This highlights the tension between advancing knowledge, exactly what doing here, or sticking with the existing power structure in academia and society as we evolve this knowledge, exactly like we're doing right here on this channel. There may be a shift towards greater public access to the items found that are being hidden from all of us to this day. And I say that this is the beginning because we are now starting this series where we're gonna expose the sites, the items that are currently being blocked off from the public, blocking them off, hiding them from all of us in attempt that has been very successful for a long time to keep their false narrative in place. How many times to this point when going back and watching the first 106 episodes have we heard off limits to the public due to preservation or to keep looters away? How many times? This is the nod. This is the key, and we now know this. We've seen this in episode 98 where access to the physical artifacts may be restricted to ensure their preservation. We've seen it in episode 102, where it is no longer being exhibited to the public. We've seen so many examples of this. And today, it couldn't be any clearer, any more straightforward that so much of what we are told in life is controlled. It's manipulated to fit the narrative that we are all given, and we are about to take this to another level. Episode 86, when we saw that the project is supported by National Agency of Cultural Heritage Preservation of Georgia. The AFCP has allocated more than $1,000,000 to preserve and protect. This is a moment where our eyes open up even further, and we are able to see with more clarity than ever before. And once you're able to see, you will never go back, understanding that preservation protecting in the world of archaeology. This means preserving and protecting themselves, their narrative. This does not mean that they are preserving or protecting what they have found, and I wanna make that very clear. And this is fully exposed now. The blindfold has been ripped off, and there's no going back. This show is a progression. It takes time to show people the truth. There is a buildup, a process. The episodes are in order for a reason. The AFCP, an initiative by the United States Department of State just starting up in 2001. What a year. A group that the people of America fund through their tax dollars. A group that the world did not need in the eighteen or nineteen hundreds. And I wonder why. Now, again, I just wanna clarify, and I don't wanna be sarcastic at all. This group is amazing. We all know that they really are preserving and protecting all of our favorite sites. They support projects in over a 130 countries, preserving tangible and intangible cultural heritage such as historic structures, archaeological sites, and traditional crafts. They restore ancient temples and mosques. Conservation of manuscripts from the old world, textiles, and old world music. Preservation of significant landscapes. They are for sure doing all of this. Jebel Barkal and the sites of the Nappatun region, Sudan, where the AFCP has funded conservation efforts at this UNESCO World Heritage Site. And we know this group very well, which includes temples, palaces, and pyramids from the old world. You've gotta ask, why are there so many groups that aim to supposedly preserve and protect sites that don't fit into the mainstream narrative that the exact same group publishes into the textbooks. And then they also fund the operation of teaching this narrative, the same narrative that they just wrote, all to the people at a young age in every single country. I believe that we have correctly translated their language. The words preserve, protect, and conservation, preserving and protecting their narrative is exactly what this means. And this unlocks so many more sites, so many old world places that is going to take this research so much further than we could have ever imagined. It will unlock places that have been hiding for so long. Without our sponsors, without our Patreons, without every subscriber, all of our badge members, and everybody who likes the episodes, This episode wouldn't be happening right now. This show, these episodes, it all honestly would have ended a long time ago. I appreciate all of you. And instead of ending this show a long time ago, because of all of you, we are now just getting started. Welcome to episode 107 of my lunch break. I hope you're all having a great day. And if you're new, welcome. Have you ever wondered what happened to the legendary Chuck Norris?

People are shaking hands with the security guard. The security guards are wearing body cams. Someone notes there's "no balaclava tonight." They ask, "You forgot your balaclava?"

Speaker 0: The time game is over. Justice with General Flynn. They criticize the Department of Just Us and recall a past moment when they would have been brought into the DOJ in handcuffs. Speaker 1: Delivers a stream of violent, braggadocious lyrics about weapons, killings, and dominance, including references to shooting, trafficking, and threatening rivals. The content emphasizes keeping enemies in check, physical violence, and material wealth, with repeated lines about not losing sleep over killers, firing weapons, and "run it up" for money and power. Speaker 2: Argues that many people gaining sudden large followings on Twitter or talking about topics like low taxes or transgender pronouns may be pedophiles, suggesting conservative media uses people with criminal pasts as influencers. States that such individuals say things to align with a broader agenda and mentions Israel in the context of a broader critique of conservative priorities. Concludes with a tip to contact Charlie Cook for those seeking a "second act" in public life. Speaker 3: Kyle Clifton discusses an after-party associated with TPUSA’s America Fest in Phoenix on December 19, called the Grand Young Party. The party reportedly featured girls dancing half-naked on stage, girls locked in cages, underage drinking, stripper poles, sex on the dance floor, and mentions “strange ritual Zionist extremism.” He notes promo footage from Florida and Phoenix, blurred faces of attendees, and that age did not matter if the attendee knew the organizer, Joe Bazrawi. Background is provided on Maverick events as the organizers. He reports a security guard tackled an 18-year-old patron, causing injuries; police encouraged filing a report for assault. Parents of other female patrons are considering lawsuits for supplying minors with alcohol. The event was advertised as a TPUSA America Fest after party, hosted by TPUSA ambassador/employee Joe Bazrawi, whose travel and lodging were paid for by TPUSA. He claims TPUSA was aware of and encouraged the party, and that Bazrawi maintains a private dossier on conservatives who oppose his party or beliefs to blacklist them from TPUSA events. Bazrawi allegedly attends other events to photograph attendees for his dossier and share with TPUSA executives. Attendees allegedly included Matt Gaetz, with rumors that James O’Keefe and Madison Cawthorn were present; photos are mentioned. Questions are raised about TPUSA’s responsibility for hosting unsanctioned events with high-profile guests and potential legal consequences or PR damage. The after-party reportedly had about 30–40 attendees leave early; refunds were issued to some in response to public comments, while others did not receive refunds. Some attendees were admitted as late as 1:45 AM; the event ended at 2 AM. Ticketing was disorganized, with staff not knowing who attended. Local Antifa chapters reportedly planned to submit stories to CNN to harm Matt Gaetz’s career. The speaker expresses concern about the conservatism movement’s image and the potential implications for Gaetz and Cawthorn. Speaker 4: The Vault claims to possess extensive material—video, pictures, emails, audio, text messages, phone calls—on everyone and to be willing to drop it all. The speaker has “a lot of crap on Richard Spencer and everybody else” and suggests signing up for Telegram to access this material. Speaker 5–6: Expressions of fear or alarm from the audience, with a call to “Dale” and a plea for help or relief, indicating tension or distress in the room.

There's a loose animal on the field—maybe a koala or a dog. Everyone's trying to catch it, but it's proving difficult. They're using trash cans, but it's escaping easily. One person is even trying to catch it with a cart. The animal is incredibly elusive, almost indestructible!

Speaker 0 discusses contacting hundreds of records departments and officials to obtain blueprints and documentation for the Field Museum in Chicago, which are supposedly from 1919 to 1921. He states the building is a 480,000 square foot palace with 75-foot interior columns, built in two years, and argues that blueprints, receipts, and other construction records should be on file in Chicago’s archives. He emphasizes that by the early 1900s Chicago had strict building codes requiring stamped architectural and structural plans, and that these plans, logs, permits, plumbing, electrical, HVAC schematics, and load calculations should be permanently archived. If the narrative is true, he says, these documents should still exist and be accessible today. The team’s outreach is described: they asked the Chicago History Museum for blueprints, engineering drawings, ledgers, and calculations, and/or evidence of construction and funding, including correspondence between architect and builder and construction costs, especially for marble procurement. The Chicago History Museum is described as preserving Chicago’s architectural history and holding archives from major firms like Graham, Anderson, Probstin White, the firm associated with the Field Museum. The museum reportedly replied that they have experienced staffing cuts and that their ability to answer architectural questions is limited, describing the collection as complicated, and stating they do not have original blueprints for the Field Museum. They reportedly only possess renovation drawings from the 1980s and can only assume they have copies of originals, with no additional information. Speaker 0 highlights a contradiction: a 1915 photograph labeled “construction of the Field Museum” published by the Chicago Daily News shows a structure with a roof, suggesting work predates the claimed 1919 start date. He notes that if the Field Museum began construction in 1919, there should be records; none are available. He questions whether there are occupancy or dedication certificates verifying completion, and repeats that the museum replied they do not believe such records exist, though there are pictures. He also references Soldier Field as having the same architectural design and links the two structures to the same builders, claiming that records are missing for both. The narrator thanks supporters and reiterates that they will continue to investigate and expose discrepancies, stating that they have now unlocked the ultimate key: the question to ask is, “Do you have the blueprints? Show them to us the receipt to the building. We wanna see it.” He claims multiple structures lack blueprints and asserts that this proves mainstream history false. He mentions continuing to pursue questions about contractor ledgers and correspondence, and notes that the Field Museum was contacted again but did not provide blueprints, acknowledging they do not have them. He concludes that the Field Museum is exposed and promises to push forward with further episodes.

The speaker claims to have 100% proof that the NFL is rigged, using magnetic gloves and balls for one-handed catches. Another speaker introduces the "Ultimate Reception," a product that allows kids to catch like professionals. These gloves are not allowed in high school or college football games and are exclusively for youth and aspiring athletes. The gloves feature a patent-pending magnetic grip system that helps the ball stick to the hand, making one-handed catches easier. The first speaker challenges skeptics to come up with excuses now.

Speaker 0 is not surprised by the crazy catch made by George, as he does stuff like that all the time. Speaker 1 agrees, mentioning that they have seen George make similar plays many times before. Speaker 0 recalls hearing stories from their high school teammates about George's wild skills on the football field, and it was exciting to witness it in person. Speaker 1 acknowledges that it was a rare sight, but George consistently performs at that level. They also mention that it was good defense and Joey shouldn't be too hard on himself. George has been making those kinds of catches since they first met.

We are in contact with hundreds of records departments, officials and the rest, in search for a single blueprint to an old world building. The Field Museum, Chicago, Illinois is said to have been constructed from 1919 to 1921, a 480,000 square foot palace building with 75 foot interior columns, supposedly designed, engineered, and completed in two years. The presenter argues that after today, viewers will understand that this place is different from the mainstream narrative, and that blueprints, framing receipts, and construction details should be on display given Chicago’s early 1900s building codes requiring stamped architectural and structural plans and permanent archival storage. The team has reached out to the Chicago History Museum, which preserves Chicago’s architectural, civic, and engineering history and holds archives from major firms including Graham, Anderson, Probstin White—the firm tied to the Field Museum. The questions posed include blueprints, engineering drawings, ledgers, engineering calculations, documents proving the Field Museum narrative, logs of communication between architect and builder, construction costs, and marble sourcing. The request letters are dated with the aim to verify the building’s construction, procurement, and design records. The Chicago History Museum’s reply notes staffing reductions, limited ability to answer architectural questions, and that they hold renovation drawings from the 1980s; they can only assume they have copies of originals and cannot provide more information. They state they do not have originals for blueprints or engineering calculations, and that their collection is complicated. The team highlights that this implies the Field Museum and the broader mainstream history may lack the expected records for a building of this scale. The team continues by noting that the Chicago History Museum also claimed to have some pictures, but not the full set of originals. They point to a 1915 Chicago Daily News photo labeled “construction of the Field Museum,” which predates the stated 1919 start date by four years, suggesting a major contradiction. They ask for inspection, occupancy, or dedication certificates verifying completion; the museum again replies they do not believe they have these. The presenter emphasizes that the Field Museum is a massive, marble-built palace on the lakefront and notes related architecture like Soldier Field, implying a connected lineage and common building methods, yet lacking the anticipated archival records. They thank supporters and promote their channels and sponsors, while continuing to press for responses from both the Chicago History Museum and the Field Museum. They report that the Field Museum replied on 10/27/2025 asking for a description of the research project and institutional affiliation; the presenter identified as an independent researcher producing a long-form documentary on architectural and engineering history, requesting blueprints, ledgers, and public records. A follow-up on 11/11/2025 produced no reply. The archivist’s awareness of not having the original blueprints is declared evident, and the presenter proclaims that the Field Museum is now exposed. The episode ends with a pledge to continue exposing these buildings worldwide and to uncover more questions and truth.

Well, we're at 1545. 1545. Is that a Dairy Queen sign? Interestingly enough, it is looks like it's been totally taken apart. Got cleaning mop buckets everywhere and so forth. And it's right across, by the way, from Brigham Young University, right across from the stadium. Right? So my point is there's the football stadium. There's cameras all over here. The FBI should be able to easily say what the path was for Robinson to get to the airport or the judge challenger. Should be flock hammers all along here.

The speaker outlines a quest to verify the original construction blueprints for major historic buildings and reports a cascade of archival rejections from several institutions. - Field Museum (Chicago, Illinois): The speaker states they have documented that the Field Museum hasn’t emailed back regarding the original blueprints to their structure. These documents would supposedly prove the mainstream story about the building. A library/archival contact at the Field Museum is cited as saying the museum holds limited orphan materials that are not fully inventoried; they do not have the original blueprints or full planning records for the 1921 construction. - Chicago History Museum (CHM) and Art Institute of Chicago: The CHM reportedly only had renovation drawings from the 1980s, not the original construction drawings, and told the researchers they didn’t have anything. The Art Institute of Chicago’s access and reference archivist indicated that their collections do not include drawings of the Field Museum and advised checking with the Field Museum. The speaker points out that both CHM and the Art Institute have told them to contact the Field Museum, which has not yet replied. - Summary across institutions: The speaker asserts three documented sources confirm that the original construction documents do not exist in the CHM, Art Institute, or Field Museum, and that these documents would typically be held by CHM or Art Institute as primary historical repositories. The speaker emphasizes that the city of Chicago should have the original blueprints for the 1921 Field Museum. - Philadelphia City Hall (in a separate thread): The speaker discusses contacting the Linda Hall Library, described as the world’s largest research library dedicated to engineering, to locate the Philadelphia City Hall’s original blueprints. The Linda Hall Library reply dated 10/24/2025 states that they do not have internal documents such as blueprints, ledgers, or correspondence for the construction of Philadelphia City Hall, nor do they have a partnership with any institution that may have them. They affirm they do not have the blueprints or internal correspondence sought. - Additional context and implications: The speaker notes that ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers) publications and WorldCat searches show no blueprints or internal construction records for Philadelphia City Hall, only secondary reporting about the building. They argue that if no original blueprints exist in these major archives, the documented construction of these buildings remains unverified. The speaker promises further updates and mentions upcoming inquiries to the New York Public Library as part of an ongoing global audit of mainstream historical narratives. - Thematic stance: The narrative centers on obtaining stamped drawings, signatures, dates, revisions, construction logs, and load calculations to verify authorship, funding, design, and construction timelines. The speaker frames the absence of primary documents as evidence that mainstream histories are unverified and subject to revision. - Channel branding and calls to action: The segment includes episode labeling (episode 156 of “my lunch break”) and promotional plugs for sponsors and patrons, as well as acknowledgments to supporters. Overall, the speaker presents a pattern of missing original construction documents across Field Museum, Chicago History Museum, Art Institute of Chicago, Linda Hall Library, and related institutions, framed as a broad verification effort challenging established architectural histories and pursuing the question: who has the original blueprints and who signed off on these structures?

When we go undercover, we cover the antiques and the crap. Can you put that back in? Thank you. Do you feel better? Did you guys get sprayed? Here, take this.

The Patriots are smart and well-coached. A narcotic search warrant is mentioned. Someone says their dad is always there like it's his dojo. An emergency call may be placed. Branches are getting stuck on sandbars. Someone says they saw him for dead. A high dose of one gram IV solu medrol for three days is mentioned for treatment. Souls are going to be spread thin. HondaLink assist will call emergency services. Someone demonstrates a filter that shows lashes and says some girls don't realize when someone has a filter on. Dashcam footage shows a cross-section of Confederate earthworks and trenches. A car is upside down. A spell called "feast of blood" with a moderate mana base cost is mentioned. Team Sportsbook is an official sports betting partner of the NFL.

Speaker 1 doesn't feel any different about the game, considering it just as regular hooping and hollering about the Cleveland Browns. They're about to call them "the else." Speaker 1 doesn't pay attention to all the talk about Cleveland and how tough it has been for the team. They only look forward to the matchup against Cleveland and don't really care about the rest. When asked about the elf logo, Speaker 1 finds it funny and different.