reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In the exchange, Speaker 0 questions whether US citizens are being surveilled today and whether the photos and data of protesters are being collected and stored in some kind of database. The interlocutor, Speaker 1, repeatedly denies these possibilities. The dialogue centers on the idea of monitoring and database tracking of protesters or Americans. Speaker 0 begins by asking: “Are you surveilling US citizens today?” to which Speaker 1 responds: “No, sir.” The line of questioning then shifts to the handling of protesters: Speaker 0 asks whether “those people protesting,” who are exercising their First Amendment rights, have had photos taken and data collected and whether that information is being placed in any kind of database. Speaker 1 answers, “There is no database for protesters, sir.” This establishes the asserted position that protest-related data is not being accumulated in a dedicated database. The discussion then foregrounds a specific allegation from Maine: Speaker 0 references “one of your officers in Maine” who said to a person protesting, “we're gonna put your face in a little database.” The implied question is about the meaning and existence of such a “little database.” Speaker 1 reiterates: “No, sir.” He adds, “We don’t.” This underscores the claim that there is no database for Americans or protesters. Speaker 0 presses further by asking, “Then what do you think your ICE agent was doing to this individual when he said those statements?” In response, Speaker 1 acknowledges an inability to speak for the individual officer but reiterates the core assertion: “I can't speak for that individual, sir, but I can assure you there is no database that's tracking United States citizens.” He closes with a direct reaffirmation, “There is no database that's tracking United States citizens.” Throughout the exchange, the central claims remain consistent: there is no surveillance program targeting US citizens in the form of a database, and there is no database for protesters. The dialogue also highlights a contrast between specific statements attributed to an officer in Maine and the official denial of any such database, with Speaker 1 insisting that they cannot speak for the individual officer while maintaining that no tracking database exists for US citizens.

La policía local está haciendo este video para aclarar su relación con ICE. Aclaran que no están reportando ni llamando a ICE cuando se encuentran con personas indocumentadas. Las acciones de ICE son independientes y la policía local desconoce a quién buscan, dónde estarán o cuándo. La policía local responde a llamadas de emergencia y crímenes, y el encuentro con una persona indocumentada no resulta en una llamada a ICE. No están trabajando con ICE ni ayudándolos a reportar a la comunidad. La policía local no sabe cuándo o dónde ICE realizará redadas, ya que ICE no les informa sobre sus operativos. **English Translation:** The local police are making this video to clarify their relationship with ICE. They clarify that they are not reporting or calling ICE when they encounter undocumented individuals. ICE's actions are independent, and the local police do not know who they are looking for, where they will be, or when. The local police respond to emergency calls and crimes, and encountering an undocumented person does not result in a call to ICE. They are not working with ICE or helping them report the community. The local police do not know when or where ICE will conduct raids, as ICE does not inform them of their operations.

Hola, buenos días. Quiero aclarar que como policía local no estamos reportando a ICE sobre personas indocumentadas. ICE actúa de manera independiente y no tenemos información sobre a quiénes buscan o cuándo estarán en nuestra área. La comunidad puede estar tranquila porque no estamos colaborando con ellos. Nuestro enfoque sigue siendo la atención de emergencias y crímenes, y no llamamos a ICE si encontramos a alguien indocumentado. Sabemos que están buscando a criminales violentos, pero no tenemos detalles sobre sus operaciones. No podemos predecir cuándo o dónde habrá redadas, ya que no nos informan sobre eso. Espero que esto ayude a tranquilizar a la comunidad. --- Hello, good morning. I want to clarify that as local police, we are not reporting to ICE about undocumented individuals. ICE operates independently, and we have no information on whom they are looking for or when they will be in our area. The community can be at ease because we are not collaborating with them. Our focus remains on emergencies and crimes, and we do not call ICE if we encounter someone undocumented. We know they are looking for violent criminals, but we have no details about their operations. We cannot predict when or where there will be raids, as they do not inform us about that. I hope this helps reassure the community.

Estamos en Estados Unidos con permiso de trabajo y número de seguro social, así que debemos mantener la calma. Entramos por el CBP 1 y somos de Venezuela. Tenemos un estatus legal debido a una aplicación civil, aunque la situación puede cambiar. Si alguien viene a buscarme, puedo mostrarles los documentos que recibí al ingresar por migración. --- We are in the United States with work permits and social security numbers, so we need to stay calm. We entered through CBP 1 and are from Venezuela. We have legal status due to a civil application, although the situation may change. If someone comes to look for me, I can show them the documents I received upon entering through immigration.

The Croton-on-Hudson Police Department assures the community that their immigration status should not prevent them from seeking assistance. The department will not inquire about immigration status unless relevant to a criminal investigation and is not authorized to question, detain, or arrest anyone based solely on immigration status. The police are required to cooperate with federal immigration authorities when there is probable cause of a criminal offense or a judicial warrant. If arrested, fingerprints are available to state and federal authorities, but immigration status will not delay release. The department pledges open dialogue and fair treatment regardless of national origin, race, gender, sex, religion, disability, or political viewpoint, and encourages residents to reach out with questions or concerns.

Speaker contends that current policy endangers public safety and that enforcement priorities are misaligned. The remarks center on immigration enforcement and its perceived consequences for communities. The speaker asserts: 'What ICE is doing is not making us safe.' They add: 'The Trump administration is treating immigrants generally, undocumented immigrants specifically as criminals.' They conclude with: 'But I remind people, being an undocumented immigrant is not a crime.' The statements underscore a distinction between immigration status and criminality, and frame immigration policy as a safety issue rather than a question of criminality. Overall, the message challenges conflating undocumented status with criminal intent and calls for a reevaluation of enforcement approaches.

We do not enforce immigration laws based on individuals' immigration status, a practice we've maintained for 50 years. Moving forward, I aim to reassure the community, which is understandably anxious due to recent rhetoric. Our primary mission is to protect everyone in our communities. Engaging in immigration enforcement or roundups would undermine that mission.

Hoy a las nueve y media, migración llegó aquí en Georgia. Había venezolanos y colombianos, y algunos catrachos que iban a trabajar. Nos vieron y preguntaron de dónde éramos. Les dije que de México, y luego se fueron sin prestarnos más atención. Estamos aquí, trabajando duro, mientras otros se van. --- Today at nine-thirty, immigration showed up here in Georgia. There were Venezuelans and Colombians, along with some Hondurans who were going to work. They saw us and asked where we were from. I told them Mexico, and then they left without paying us any more attention. We're here, working hard, while others leave.

I want to send a clear message to ICE: I am ready to assist you. We will prioritize helping you target criminal illegal immigrants, including drug dealers and human traffickers, as well as those who cross our borders without proper controls. We now have millions of undocumented individuals in our country, many of whom break the law. Our main focus is on criminal illegals, and we will provide ICE with any support we can, regardless of whether we are a blue or sanctuary state. Our new governor has a duty to ensure the safety of our state, and if they fail, they will be held responsible. As an elected sheriff, I answer to the people, not the governor or county commissioners. My priority is your safety and the safety of our county within the state.

The transcript captures a tense moment at a Bergen Lyon Avenue location near a White Castle, where Speaker 1 reports that ICE came by and grabbed people, stating, “ICE came by and grabbed people. They are targeting the bus stops. Again, they are targeting the bus stops.” Speaker 0 responds with anger, asking, “What are you doing?” and labeling the action as terrorism, saying, “You fucking terrorists. You’re a fucking terrorist.” The speakers describe the scene as individuals were taken from the area, emphasizing that the raids are focused on bus stops and the surrounding vicinity, including Fairview Avenue, with Speaker 1 asking, “How many other bus stops? How many other locations?” They urge vigilance for others, noting that “any moment a vehicle like this can't see into the window” due to tinted windows, warning that law enforcement came into the location and “grabbed people.” Speaker 1 reiterates the need to “be on point” and to “be aware of what you're doing,” urging people to stay attentive as they go about their day. Throughout, there is a sense of fear and urgency, with the speakers repeatedly calling attention to the raids and the targeting of public transit access points like bus stops. Additional exchanges include Speaker 0 directing, “Hey. Hey. No. No. No. You're not gonna scare me,” and Speaker 1 insisting, “Don't touch her. Don't touch her. Don’t touch her.” The overall message is a warning to community members about ICE activity at specific transit hubs and the potential for people to be detained, paired with strong emotional reactions to the perceived aggression and disruption.

Hello, friends. Recently, a Trump official issued a memorandum threatening local law enforcement with jail time if they don’t cooperate with federal immigration officials. However, there is no law requiring local officials to do so. Our state's resources should focus on state matters, not federal immigration enforcement. Local law enforcement should not act as agents for the Trump administration, which has previously lost in court trying to coerce states. I have no fear of the Trump administration. We will prioritize our state’s business and will not interfere with federal operations, but we will not carry out their demands. Thank you.

The speaker thanks the press office for releasing information on ICE arrests and asks why similar information isn't released for deportations to El Salvador. The response states that the Department of Homeland Security released the information. The individuals deported to El Salvador are foreign terrorists, and these deportations are counterterrorism operations, unlike the arrests and removals conducted daily by law enforcement. The speaker notes that the details provided were not released by the adjuster. The response clarifies that the deportation was a counterterrorism operation involving foreign terrorists, not illegal immigrants convicted of crimes in American communities, emphasizing that these are distinct categories with different definitions.

I firmly believe that no one from ICE will ever come into my classroom to remove a student, especially since I have no undocumented students. Even if I did, the Plyler v. Doe ruling ensures that everyone is entitled to a free and appropriate education. I'm currently engaged in teaching and cannot answer the door right now. You'll have to come back later, which means never, because I stand firmly against any actions that threaten my students' rights.

Attention, Baltimore residents. I received a tip from a follower who heard from a trusted source that Johns Hopkins Hospital anticipates ICE activity this week, potentially involving arrests and deportations. The exact timing is unknown, but the information comes from a reliable source within the hospital. Please be aware and share this important message.

The mayor addressed the city council's push for an investigation into whether the NYPD shared sealed records with ICE, potentially violating local law. The mayor stated the city does not collaborate with agencies on civil enforcement, as the law prohibits it, but does collaborate on criminal enforcement. The mayor expressed disappointment that the city council is focusing on investigating collaboration instead of advocating for going after those who commit serious crimes against New Yorkers, migrants, and asylum seekers. The mayor reiterated the city's focus should be on protecting innocent New Yorkers and that they do not collaborate on civil enforcement. The mayor stated ICE is not a criminal organization, but a federal law enforcement organization, and the city will use them to protect innocent people.

Hola, buenos días. Quiero aclarar que como policía local no estamos reportando a ICE sobre personas indocumentadas. ICE actúa de manera independiente y no tenemos información sobre a quiénes buscan ni cuándo estarán. La comunidad puede estar tranquila; no estamos colaborando con ellos. Nuestro enfoque sigue siendo atender emergencias y crímenes, y si encontramos a alguien indocumentado, no lo reportamos a ICE. Ellos están buscando principalmente a criminales violentos, pero no sabemos más sobre sus criterios. No tenemos información sobre redadas ni cuándo ocurrirán, ya que no nos avisan. Espero que esto ayude a tranquilizar a la comunidad. --- Hello, good morning. I want to clarify that as local police, we are not reporting to ICE about undocumented individuals. ICE acts independently, and we have no information on whom they are looking for or when they will be present. The community can be reassured; we are not collaborating with them. Our focus remains on responding to emergencies and crimes, and if we encounter someone undocumented, we do not report them to ICE. They are primarily looking for violent criminals, but we know nothing more about their criteria. We have no information on raids or when they will occur, as they do not inform us. I hope this helps reassure the community.

Hey, how's it going? I'm just curious about the facilities back here. Are they being used? I noticed there aren't many workers coming in or out. We can't allow recording on-site, but we can answer questions. This area is for rapid response in emergencies, mainly for first responders. They stay here to rest between their duties. People think it's for housing illegals, but it's not. The workers are out doing their jobs during the day, which is why you might not see them. Thanks for the clarification. It's important to get accurate information instead of assumptions. Have a great day!

A heated exchange unfolds between Speaker 0, who identifies as part of a community protection group, and Speaker 1, who represents ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement). Speaker 0 confronts the ICE team as they arrive in the neighborhood, insisting on seeing a warrant and demanding identification. The dialogue centers on whether the agents have a warrant signed by a judge and whether they should reveal badge numbers or other identifying information. Speaker 0 repeatedly presses for documentation: “Could you show me it, please?” and asks, “Do you have a warrant signed by a judge?” He questions the legitimacy of the officers’ presence, asking, “What’s your badge number, sir? Do you have a badge number? Can you identify yourself, please?” He emphasizes that “you’re coming into my city” and challenges why they would be in the area. Speaker 1 responds briefly and evasively, asserting identity as ICE and insisting that Speaker 0 has no business being present: “I’m ICE. Immigration. Immigration. Immigration. Customs enforcement. Okay. That’s all I am.” He adds, “You don’t have business when we get out of here, sir,” and later, “We’re looking for somebody,” though Speaker 0 pushes to know the name of the person they are pursuing: “Do you know his name? Do you have his name or her their name? What is their name?” Speaker 0 emphasizes community scrutiny and accountability, stating, “These are one of my neighbors, so I just wanna,” and challenges the officers’ transparency, asking for their identifications and accusing them of hiding their faces: “Why are you covering your face? Why don’t you take your mask down?” He taunts them with a threat to publish the encounter: “I’m gonna get this on the Internet. Your family is gonna be ashamed of you when they learn what you’re doing.” As the exchange escalates, Speaker 1 asserts authority and tries to disengage: “You don’t have business when we get out of here,” and “Okay. That’s all I am.” The confrontation intensifies with Speaker 0 inviting an on-the-record discussion and challenging the officers to converse “down” with him instead of remaining in their vehicle. The dialogue culminates with a physical and verbal standoff as Speaker 0 steps back and the officers retreat, while Speaker 0 continues to voice distrust, calling the actions “Gestapo”-like and insisting that the officers come talk to him in the street rather than remaining behind a door or in a car.

The speaker addresses a predominantly Latino audience who express fear due to perceived targeting based on skin color. The speaker refutes this, calling it a false narrative perpetuated by the media, judges, and others. They assert that ICE operations are based on investigative work and casework, requiring reasonable suspicion of criminal activity before engaging with individuals. The speaker insists that the narrative of targeting based on skin color is untrue and should not be repeated.

There are reports of ICE notifications being sent to businesses in Chicago, threatening audits of their workers. This is especially concerning for Mexican-owned businesses like my restaurant, where all my employees are also Mexican. The potential fines of $20,000 per undocumented worker could bankrupt us. We understand it's technically illegal to hire workers who aren't documented, but people come here to work hard and improve their lives, and I can't turn them away simply based on their status. If anyone has expertise on this issue, particularly regarding whether these audits are widespread or targeted, please share your knowledge. In the meantime, I'm praying for protection and guidance.

Attention, Baltimore residents. I received a message from a follower who got a tip from a trusted source. Johns Hopkins Hospital is expecting ICE to conduct arrests related to deportations this week. We don't know the exact days, but the information comes from a reliable source within the hospital. Please be aware and spread the word.

Mary Andy Ginther addresses residents to discuss the increase in federal immigration law enforcement activity in the city. She states that while the city cannot prevent federal agents from being present, it does not discriminate against any residents based on immigration status. She says, “Do not obstruct federal law enforcement activity,” but if you see something you don’t think is right or interacting with law enforcement officials, it’s okay to record that conversation on your phone. She also emphasizes that residents should continue to feel safe to call Columbus police and 911. Ginther reassures residents that “Our police will not be used to carry out these operations.” She outlines rights and practical guidance for interacting with authorities. She instructs residents to create a safety plan with their family and loved ones, to carry identification or documentation of their status, and to stay calm and truthful when interacting with law enforcement. She reminds people, “Remember, you have the right to remain silent,” and advises memorizing the phone number of someone they can call if they need help. She reiterates that Columbus is already safe without federal intervention and urges residents to take care of one another. Ginther closes by noting that community leaders see and support you, expressing gratitude with “Thank you.”

San Francisco remains a sanctuary city, committed to protecting its immigrant community. The sheriff's office will not participate in immigration raids or federal law enforcement actions against immigrants. A sanctuary city fosters safety, encouraging individuals to report and testify about crimes without fear. Immigrants have played a vital role in building and enriching the nation, and San Francisco proudly supports and celebrates its immigrant population. We stand together for immigrants, families, and workers. This is what community looks like.

We're reporting on anti-ICE activists in California who are actively obstructing immigration enforcement. Some activists are using bullhorns and sirens to warn migrants of ICE presence, advising them of their rights not to speak or open doors without a warrant. These activists claim to be working with dozens of organizations across the LA area. Separately, flyers revealing the identities of ICE agents have surfaced, causing concern. This doxxing puts agents at risk. As someone who has experienced similar threats, I can say that these agents don't deserve this treatment. They are working to make their community safer by focusing on criminal threats and national security.

Do many of you speak English? We want to talk to as many workers as possible. There’s a lot of concern about immigration issues, but you should know that you don’t need to worry about law enforcement, the sheriff's office, or the police regarding immigration matters. We do not handle immigration enforcement.