reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The IRS has been using AI to access bank accounts of American citizens without search warrants or evidence of a crime, violating the 4th Amendment. An undercover journalist discovered this and found that the IRS claims to have access to every person's bank account. The IRS targets the middle class and little guys who can't defend themselves, rather than the wealthy. A new administration is needed to address this issue and hold federal officials accountable for violating citizens' rights. The IRS's use of AI to target the middle class is a move to extract money from them. The former head of the Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan, stated that the US can pay any debt by printing money, ensuring zero probability of default. This system is designed to destroy the middle class and consolidate wealth in the hands of a few.

I refuse to support the system by paying taxes. The government deceives us about where our money goes. The media is controlled by the same people who own the Federal Reserve. We must unite and stop being divided. Research and decide if you want to be a slave or break free. Don't feed the monster. Take control of your money and country. We need to get back on track together. It's time to act. Thank you. Translation: I do not pay taxes to support the system. The government misleads us about the use of our money. The media is controlled by the same people who own the Federal Reserve. We must unite and stop being divided. Research and decide if you want to be a slave or break free. Do not feed the monster. Take control of your money and country. We need to get back on track together. It is time to act. Thank you.

Speaker 0 outlines a stance of widespread tax resistance among Americans who deem the government corrupt and unrepresentative. He states, “there were so many people, mostly American patriots, who said, I don't care what the consequences are. I will not continue to pay taxes to a corrupt government that doesn't represent me.” He claims the IRS is already down “25% from last year.” He then criticizes those who have “never worked a day in their life but yet wanna make rules for the rest of us,” arguing they “overdo themselves and kill the goose that laid the golden egg.” He describes consequences of the government’s actions as not only crashing the economy but creating a scenario where people “have a choice” between basic needs and paying taxes: “Keep a roof over your family's head or pay taxes. Feed your children or pay taxes. Live a little bit like a fucking human being or pay your fucking taxes.” He asserts that many will be unable to pay taxes this year, and those who “just up and decide fuck them and file exempt on their fucking forms” will “totally overwhelm the IRS,” including “those 80,000 gun toting Nazi motherfuckers who have been harassing us for years.” The message implies a public record of asking the IRS for the law that states a wage earner must pay taxes, and claims they cannot provide it “because it was never legal in the first place.” He elaborates that “when you work and somebody gives you money or some form of compensation, that's not profit. That's an exchange, and it was never intended to be taxes.” The consequence, he says, is that “the government's gonna self destruct. It's gonna totally overwhelm the system.” He uses imagery to argue that people should resist, saying, “let those motherfuckers try driving their car with no gas in it.” In closing, he invites audience participation: “If you like what I'm saying, give me a hell yeah and a fuck you to their paperwork.”

The speaker criticizes the financial system, arguing that it enslaves people through debt. They highlight how mortgages and taxes keep individuals under the control of banks and the government. They believe that the system rewards immoral behavior and punishes those who operate on a higher moral level. Another speaker, who worked at the IRS, criticizes the unfair treatment of small businesses compared to larger corporations when it comes to taxes. They question the legality of income tax and argue that it is a form of slavery. The video also touches on topics such as inflation, the flaws of fiat money, the potential dangers of vaccines, and the benefits of Bitcoin as a decentralized currency.

The speaker initially believed that there was a law requiring people to file tax returns, but after researching for three and a half months, they couldn't find a clear statute that made a person liable. They realized that the government collects taxes to generate revenue, but they were unaware of the complexities involved. The speaker attended a meeting where someone argued that the IRS lacks authority, but they initially dismissed it as taking things out of context. However, after a conversation with the person, the speaker agreed to research the matter further. They delved into the Internal Revenue Code and found sections that seemed relevant but didn't provide a clear answer. The speaker's research led them to question their own authority to enforce tax laws, ultimately leading to their resignation. They discovered that the Internal Revenue Manual restricts enforcement due to constitutional issues. The speaker believes that if more people knew about the government's methods, they would stop filing tax returns.

The speaker interviews former IRS commissioner Sheldon Cohn about the tax code and voluntary compliance. They discuss the definition of income, Supreme Court decisions, and challenges the IRS to show a statute allowing a direct tax on wages. Cohn asserts that the law requires filing tax returns, despite objections. The speaker questions the IRS's legal authority and highlights inconsistencies in tax enforcement. Ultimately, the speaker challenges the IRS to prove the legality of income tax laws. Translation: The speaker interviews former IRS commissioner Sheldon Cohn about the tax code and voluntary compliance. They discuss the definition of income, Supreme Court decisions, and challenges the IRS to show a statute allowing a direct tax on wages. Cohn asserts that the law requires filing tax returns, despite objections. The speaker questions the IRS's legal authority and highlights inconsistencies in tax enforcement. Ultimately, the speaker challenges the IRS to prove the legality of income tax laws.

A man who can show where my money is going and prove it's not going to the right places is not my enemy; he's trying to help me. Stop making it about race; it's them against all of us. They will lock you up if you don't file your taxes. They're saying you have to give them your money so they can buy things like condoms and coffee cups for their employees. If you don't, they'll lock you up. Why isn't anybody living? I know I'm not the only one actually living.

The speaker owns 12,000 rental units acquired through debt, stating that more debt leads to more property and less tax. They believe paying taxes is a Marxist idea and against American principles. According to the speaker, Marx considered a progressive income tax essential for spreading communism. They claim America was founded as a tax-free nation until the creation of the Federal Reserve and the IRS in 1913. They assert that they legally pay no taxes, while those who work harder pay higher taxes, which they equate to communism. The speaker concludes it's an American duty not to pay taxes, citing the Communist Manifesto.

A former IRS commissioner is interviewed about the tax code and income tax laws. He argues that the IRS code is voluntary compliance, not mandatory, and defends the IRS's actions. The interviewer challenges the legality of income tax on labor, citing Supreme Court decisions. The former commissioner dismisses the arguments and asserts the IRS's authority. The interview ends with a confrontation, revealing a lack of transparency in tax laws and enforcement. The interviewer questions the legality of income tax on wages and calls for the IRS to show the law to the public.

The speaker criticizes the financial system, arguing that it is designed to enslave people through debt. They highlight how mortgages and taxes keep individuals under the control of banks and the government. They believe that the system rewards immoral behavior and punishes those who operate on a higher moral level. Another speaker, who worked at the IRS, shares their experience of unfair treatment towards small businesses compared to larger corporations. They question the legality of income tax and argue that it is a form of slavery. The video also touches on topics such as inflation, the flaws of fiat money, the potential dangers of vaccines, and the transformative power of Bitcoin.

Speaker 0: There is no law. And to date, nobody has been able to show that there is a law for the average American citizen working day in and day out to pay an income tax. Speaker 1: But We, The People Foundation for Constitutional Education put a full page ad in The USA Today on 07/07/2000. And within the body of that ad was a $50,000 challenge for anyone that could show the law. And to me, $50,000 is a lot of money. So I went after that and did the research based on the fact that I thought, let's put this baby to bed. I'm hearing all these rumors. You know, I'm gonna kill two birds with one stone. I'll answer these people's questions they're asking me, and then I win this $50,000. And, you know, based on the research that I did throughout the year 2000 and that I'm still doing, I have not found that law. I've asked congress. We've asked a lot of people in the IRS, IRS commissioners, helpers. They can't answer because if they answer, the American people are gonna know that this whole thing is a fraud. Speaker 2: There is no law. There is no law that requires the average American worker in the private sector to pay a direct unapportioned tax on their labor and compensation for services. There is no law. Speaker 3: I really expected that, of course, there's a law that you can point to in the law book, the code, that requires you to file a tax return. Of course, there is. I mean, I don't know what it is right then as we as he was speaking to me, but sure. So, naively, I agreed to go off and research it and get back to him. Three and a half months later, I was at that point where I couldn't find the statute that clearly made a person liable, at least not me and, most people I know. And I had no no choice in my mind except to to resign. Speaker 4: I had to leave the IRS because I presented, evidence that I had accumulated indicating that the agency was violating the law and violating people's rights. And I asked the agency for a response to my sincere concerns, and the answer I got was that they would not respond to my concerns and that they would, provide me with the paperwork necessary to tender my resignation. Speaker 5: You can look through the statutes and look for the law that requires you to pay. And when you do that, you can't identify a law that requires the average person in America who earns a wage and works in private business to pay an income tax. Speaker 2: American citizens, along with the foundation, have been asking the IRS to specifically provide them with the the underlying legal foundation upon which they administer and enforce the personal income tax laws in our country. Speaker 3: At the national level, when people would attempt to contact somebody of a much higher authority, say the cons the commissioner, same kind of thing. They wouldn't get they would get answers that were in effect non answers. Speaker 6: You have to understand that an agency which will unlawfully impose a tax that doesn't exist it's not gonna care. If we, the people, don't know what our rights are, they're not gonna tell us. Speaker 4: If Americans just learned that the IRS was actually knowingly deceiving them, that that enough that would be enough for them to rise up and put a stop to it. Speaker 7: 100% of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the federal debt. All individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services taxpayers expect from government. People have been told, you know, that you need this income tax system to fund government, is absolutely ridiculous. I mean, my question is, well, if that's true, how did we fund government from 1776 to 1913? Speaker 8: The main purpose of the income tax is not to raise revenue, but to redistribute wealth and to control society. And a lot Speaker 9: of people might say, well, gee, if there wasn't an income tax, what would happen to education? They don't understand that education is paid for, for the most part, out of state and local taxes, your property tax. People might say, well, how are we going to build and maintain our highways if there's no money coming into the government? We need our highways. There is a tax on every gallon of gasoline that people buy. Proceeds from the income tax do not pay for highway construction. Speaker 10: I believe that in both spirit and substance, our tax system has come to be un American. Death and taxes may be inevitable, but unjust taxes

I couldn't find a law requiring me to file taxes, so I resigned. The IRS wouldn't address my concerns and asked me to resign. I searched for the law to win $50,000 but couldn't find it. Trained IRS agents said there's no law for Americans to file taxes. I haven't filed taxes since leaving, and many others don't file either.

The speaker asserts that you cannot legally pay your taxes. They state: “tax dollars have been spent in a global crime syndicate,” and “you now know this and it’s provable,” which means “if you willingly pay your taxes you now are a willing participant and co conspirator.” The guidance given is for when you file an exemption: “This is what you’re gonna say when you file an exemption. Owe back taxes? This is what you’re gonna tell your agent.” The agent will threaten you, and you should respond with, “I said that I will not be a willing participant in a global crime syndicate.” The speaker says you should repeat it, “and you repeat it again.” They advise to “play the congress game” and claim that “you legally cannot pay your taxes now that you know this. It is against the law.”

The year was 1871, and while the events of this year have been purposefully hidden from the masses, 1871 must never be forgotten. Much like Vatican City and the City Of London, Washington, D. C. Has its own sovereignty. Basically, D.C., City Of London, and Vatican City are totally separate territories from the nations in which they reside. Vatican City is technically enclaved within Rome, outfitted with its own special police force and political structure, the same way the City Of London is situated within the city called London, and it has its own flag, crest, police force, ceremonial armed forces, and a mayor. And sure, there are states within The United States that have their own constitution and distinctive flags, but I think most people you'd ask would know that Washington, D. C. Isn't a state. Most folks would tell you that Washington, D. C. Is where our laws are made, where our politicians congregate, and where our White House resides. But on the D. C. Flag, which is said to have been reflective of George Washington's coat of arms, there are three stars. And I wonder, are those stars representative of the three city states that exist as corporate entities outside of their respective nations? Vatican City, the religious hub, the city of London, the banking central, and Washington, D. C, the military leg of the empire. Being its own city state, DC has its own police force that shares a direct link with Congress, its own mayor, and its own set of laws. But our founding father certainly didn't set it up like this. So how did it come to be? The year was 1871. The US was going through a lot of turmoil. The nation was bankrupt and vulnerable after the civil war, and the London bankers, which included the notorious Rothschild family, were ready to make a deal with congress to remedy that turmoil. Turmoil, I might add, that is suspected that the bankers had a hand in creating in the first place. At any rate, these bankers made a lot of credit available in the aftermath of the civil war as a means to, one, fight Lincoln's greenback after he was murdered, with some theorizing that part of the motivation for his assassination came from his push to privatize the monetary system. The second reason that the bankers made so much credit available was to collect on the interest from those who desperately needed the money, which would be the United States government at the time. Now, this was nothing new, this was practice as old as time. Well, as old as Mystery Babylon. Not much has really changed since the days of Babylon, not the usury, not the debt slavery, not even the iconography. Passed by Congress, the Act of 1871 provided a government for the 10 mile parcel of land known as the District Of Columbia, allowing Washington, D. C. To act as a corporation outside of the original Constitution of The United States. So, okay, why does the Washington, D. C. Constitution have nothing to do with The United States constitution? Why exactly is Washington, D. C. Totally separate from the rest of The United States? Why does it need to be separate from The United States, as a separate territory at the epicenter of the Virgin Mary, tucked right between Virginia and Maryland? The Act of 1871 changed our country's founding fathers' original constitution for The United States for America to the constitution of The United States Of America. If you blink, you might miss it because it's a mixture of impactful wording and some weird capitalization thrown in there that pretty means nothing to the average person upon initial inspection. But these subtle changes are a huge deal in the realm of legislation. Compounded with these minor changes was clever marketing of the act as a way to unify the territorial government for the entire District of Columbia. The aforementioned are contributing factors as to how such a major act flew under the radar, ultimately overturning the United States Constitutional Republic. Since 1871, the federal government has usurped nearly all of the power that was formerly held in the hands of the people. But how on earth was Congress able to pass a separate constitution and incorporate The United States? A bunch of attorneys have contacted me about this subject, explaining it to me, thank you for everyone who's done that, but let me break it down to you in a way that won't make you just totally fall asleep. A corporation, by definition, is a legal entity from its owners. A corporation protects its owners from personal liability for corporate debts and obligations within limits. So was the Act of 1871 as harmless as some claim just an act to provide a government for the District Of Columbia and nothing more? We can answer that question by simply stepping back and taking a look at the dominoes that fell after this act was passed, and asking the question: Who benefited from this piece of legislation? Is the Act of 1871 the reason why Congress passed the sixteenth amendment, which allowed the federal government to tax individual personal income regardless of state population? Is the Act of 1871 the reason why the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was passed, handing over America's gold and silver reserves and ultimately the total control of America's economy to the Federal Reserve Bank. Think about it. A private corporation established their private bank, acting as the central bank of The United States, But it isn't even a government institution, but a privately owned banking system. Is it a coincidence that social security numbers started being assigned in 1935, social security numbers being the nine digit numbers given to every U. S. Citizen, and used for income tracking and taxation purposes. Ultimately, individual income taxes have been the primary source of revenue for the U. S. Federal government since the 1950s. These moves make a lot of sense when examined through the lens of The United States as a corporation and its citizens as employees, a corporate government asset before they even go through puberty. But still, throughout all this time, there was a promise that the American dollar was actually worth something. Something tangible, not just the confidence to exchange it for goods and services. A dollar was worth one thirty fifth an ounce of gold. But then President Richard Nixon came along and screwed that up for us. Severing the final link between the dollar and gold in 1971. In other words, he took the dollar off the gold standard once and for all. Steadily, the purchasing power of the dollar has declined while federal and consumer debt has increased. Currently, we're witnessing the culmination of all of these decisions, and it ain't pretty. We're one bad flu season removed from Weimar Republic wheelbarrow money. So who would you say benefited from the Act of 1871? The average US citizen, or the bankers who incorporated The United States, who have been buying politicians ever since? The same Federal Reserve who serves absolutely no real function except stealing the purchasing power of your sixty plus hour work week and then redistributing those funds to destroy your rights and enslave you on your own soil. Hey, just like they did back in Babylon. It's the same folks using the same debt slavery system, time after time. When will we learn that debt with interest is a system of perpetual debt, and is continually passed on to the people beneath, until until the debt gap consumes all but those who own the debt? Well, like I said in the beginning of this video, the most pivotal year in United States history was never taught to me in schoolpublic or privateand never taught to me at a college level. But as Americans, it's so important that we not let this information die with our generation. One of the most important lessons you can teach your children is how to obtain their own freedomhow to identify when their freedoms are being taken from them, and how to demand those personal freedoms and liberties back, instead of waiting around for a hero in the form of a politician to represent them, to offer solutions. During this time, we've seen people of all ages crying out for change. And instead of focusing on the changes we could make that could fundamentally change The United States for the better, especially on an individual level, politicians are selling socialism and communism, aka more government control, to young people looking for an answer. And they beg for it because the future seems so bleak. Whether you play with paper or with digital money, the future will always be bleak if you're a debt slave. If before your foot even touches this earth, you're scanned into the system as an employee of this corporation who does not care about you one bit. The United States is still a great country, but it has its problems, and you know you can riot and loot and protest protest all all you you want. Want, But until the Federal Reserve is ended, until the Act of 1871 is torn into a thousand pieces and thrown into the wind, until the IRS is abolished, and until we move back to the gold standard, we have no chance at experiencing any iota of freedom.

Speaker 0 argues that money controllers make all rules and that America has become a socialist communist country, not capitalistic, because of a central bank. He says a central bank prevents capitalism and that prosperity is created by printing dollars or injecting digits into the economy, which results in an infusion of credit rather than real manufacturing or prosperity. Speaker 1 summarizes as a money planned economy. Speaker 0 asserts that with the creation of the Federal Reserve System, the government became dependent on private banks for money, and began taxing people. He states Social Security started in 1935, issuing Social Security cards with numbers on them and deducting money from paychecks under the belief it would fund retirement. He says income tax followed, enabled by Social Security, and notes the government now takes money out automatically, implying distrust of public willingness to pay. Speaker 1 comments that the government now controls the tax payment itself and that people are effectively slaves because taxes are taken automatically. Speaker 0 contends that through the Federal Reserve System, the government has become vested in bankers who profit from taxation, and that the bankers have taken control of the government, making Republicans and Democrats essentially the same since neither party proposes shutting down the Fed or stopping taxes or addressing major American issues. Speaker 1 introduces a personal connection: Nick Rockefeller, of the Rockefeller family, who, through an attorney, discussed with Speaker 0 the banking industry’s ultimate plan. Speaker 0 claims they discussed a global banking network, asserting that central banks exist worldwide, including in Germany, England, and Italy, and that central banking is part of the Communist Manifesto. He argues that two major planks—central banking and a graduated income tax—have been adopted in the United States as part of the Communist Manifesto, integrated via the Federal Reserve System. Speaker 0 then outlines the ultimate goal: to create a one-world government run by bankers, implemented in sections via the European currency, the euro, and the European constitution. He claims there is an effort to establish a North American Union in the United States and to create a new currency called the AMERO, all contributing to a worldwide government. Speaker 0 describes a future where every person is chipped with RFID, and all money exists in those chips. He claims money could be deducted digitally from the chip by authorities, eliminating cash, effectively giving total control to the authorities. He says protesters could have their chips turned off, leaving them unable to buy food or do anything, equating this to total control over people. Speaker 1 adds that the chip would be connected to a database containing purchasing records and other personal data. Speaker 0 reiterates the goal of a one-world government controlled by the banking industry, with everyone chipped and all money stored in chips, allowing control over every financial transaction and making people slaves or serfs to the bankers.

Marjorie Taylor Greene discusses an interview she conducted with Paymon Matajeda of the Freedom Law School, focusing on a contentious issue in America: opposition to paying income taxes and the broader concerns about the tax system, debt, foreign entanglements, fraud, waste, and accountability. She then introduces Joe Bannister, a former IRS special agent who stopped paying taxes and who joins the discussion to elaborate on his experiences. Joe Bannister explains his background: he started with the IRS in November 1993, was sworn in in Oakland, California, and his first duty station was San Francisco. He grew up in San Jose and later served as an IRS special agent in the criminal investigation division. He recounts meeting Paymon in 1997 after being influenced by a radio host who discussed the notion that income tax wasn’t required for the majority of Americans. At that time, Bannister was an actively serving agent, working in roles such as asset forfeiture coordinator for the Central California District, organized crime task force coordinator, and firearms instructor. He describes his early curiosity and the long process of investigating these ideas, including studying at law libraries, the IRS law library, and other sources. Bannister details that, although he was an IRS agent, he began privately researching the Federal income tax during off hours in 1997-1998, driven by a belief in upholding the Constitution. He describes how, during a large search warrant operation in Southern California, he encountered a library in a suspect’s house that contained books he himself had on his own shelf, which reinforced his suspicions. He recounts standing up to senior agents who wanted to seize more property than was authorized, arguing as asset forfeiture coordinator that they could not take items without justification. This incident marked a watershed moment, reinforcing his concern about supports for the law and the Constitution. Bannister explains that by 1999, after receiving information from Paymon and credible outsiders—lawyers, CPAs, and other patriots—he had accumulated evidence, including Supreme Court case law, the Code of Federal Regulations, the Internal Revenue Code, and IRS internal documents (like the IRS Manual) showing that the IRS’s authority was more limited than commonly taught. He describes discovering that the same books he read were also in the IRS’s own library, indicating that the information existed within the agency but was not publicly taught or applied in prosecutions. He recounts deciding to tell his supervisors about his findings. He prepared a factual report, focusing on the evidence and avoiding opinion, and presented it along with a transmittal letter to his group manager and higher-ups, explaining that he could not serve “two masters” and that he had an obligation to the Constitution. The response was to isolate him: within a few days, he was told the agency would not address his questions and would provide paperwork to resign; he was offered administrative leave and questioned about moving up the chain of command. On February 25, 1999 (his birthday), he resigned from the IRS after determining he could not continue in the role given his concerns about constitutional compliance. Following resignation, Bannister returned to private practice as a CPA and worked at a firm connected to KPMG alumni, but encountered resistance when refusing to sign a W-4 withholding form without proof of a legal requirement. He asserts that there was a lack of familiarity with these tax issues among his colleagues, including at the CPA firm. He mentions that the IRS later audited him after he left, which led to revelations about fraudulent coding in their system, including a claim that he had filed a 1040A and asked the IRS to calculate his tax, which he disputes. He explains that the 1040A mechanism is something the IRS allegedly used to generate assessments against non-filers, indicating the potential breadth of this issue. Bannister explains that he and Paymon later spoke publicly through forums such as the We the People Foundation for Constitutional Education, symposiums at the National Press Club, and appearances on C-SPAN and the New York Times. He notes that he was indicted in November 2004 on four federal felonies, including conspiring to defraud the United States and preparing three false federal income tax returns, while having not filed a federal return for five years. His defense was led by Robert Bernhoft, who also defended Wesley Snipes. Bannister was acquitted in June 2005 after seven months of preparation, with the prosecution’s own expert unable to point to any false or fraudulent entries on the returns Bannister prepared. He emphasizes that he has not paid federal income taxes since then. The interview also covers Bannister’s reflections on the IRS’s broader practices, including a claim that the IRS lied to its own computer systems to generate assessments against non-cooperators, based on transcripts and FOIA requests. He mentions the website agentfortruth.com and his book, Investigating the Federal A: A Report to the American People (renamed in 2019 from its 1999 title). He closes by reiterating his stance that the information is a factual account of his experiences and that individuals can investigate these claims independently.

This video explores various perspectives on the American government, particularly the IRS and the Federal Reserve. It questions the existence of a law requiring American citizens to pay income taxes, with interviews featuring former IRS agents, tax experts, and jurors who argue that the income tax system is unconstitutional. The video also delves into concerns about the erosion of individual rights, the rise of a police state, and the push for a one world government. It highlights the power and control of the Federal Reserve, suggesting it is used by the elite to manipulate the economy. The speaker urges people to resist government control, emphasizing the need to shut down the Federal Reserve and regain control of their government. There are also mentions of potential government actions such as martial law, relocation of populations, and the construction of internment camps, which the speaker believes are part of a planned takeover of the American people. The video encourages unity and action to restore power to the people.

Democrats plan to expand the IRS with 87,000 new agents, according to the administration's treasury department. One speaker claims to have not paid federal income taxes for 30 years, blaming international bankers and the Federal Reserve. Another speaker criticizes Congress for implementing income tax in 1909 and questions why technological advances haven't made everyone prosperous. They propose a plan to drain the Washington DC swamp. The same speaker claims to be the number one NMD IRS and pays taxes, but also mentions voting for Barack and Hillary as an American thing to do.

I'm saying, if someone can show me where my money's going and that it's not being used right, they're not my enemy. They're trying to help me out. This isn't about race; it's about them against all of us. They'll lock you up if you don't pay your taxes, basically forcing you to give them your money so they can spend it how they want. Why aren't people living? You'll kill someone over $3. We need to do better. You're not my enemy, whether you're a Democrat or a liberal. Forget race and even immigrants. We're talking about the money they force us to spend.

The speaker, a former IRS agent, shares her experience working for the IRS and her realization that the income tax system is fraudulent. She explains how the IRS uses tactics to make people believe they owe more money than they actually do. After leaving the IRS, she researched and discovered evidence that the income tax is not necessary for running the country. She also discusses the Federal Reserve and its non-federal nature, as well as the media's influence in suppressing this information. The speaker encourages people to do their own research and make informed decisions about paying taxes. She emphasizes the importance of understanding the system and taking action to bring the country back on track.

There is no law requiring payment of taxes in the US. The IRS manual states they have no jurisdiction over US workers, only those abroad. Share this info and challenge the IRS to prove tax obligations.

The speaker interviews Sheldon Cohn, a former IRS commissioner, about the belief that there is no law requiring Americans to pay income tax. Cohn argues that voluntary compliance is used as a term for traffic laws, but it does not apply to income tax. The speaker questions the definition of income and cites Supreme Court rulings that state income is not wages. They also discuss the lack of a law making individuals liable to file a tax return. Cohn dismisses the Supreme Court's relevance to the IRS and the speaker concludes that the IRS operates through intimidation and fear. They challenge the IRS to show a statute allowing a direct tax on wages.

There is no left or right, only "them" versus "we the people." Tax dollars fund endless wars and aid illegal immigrants while Americans receive little support. It's time to stop funding the machine that harms the people. If tax money is weaponized against the people, stop paying. Free men don't ask permission to help those in need, including babies, children, women, and men devastated by crises. Yet, authorities prevent resources from reaching them, threatening helpers with jail. Therefore, it's time to stop paying taxes and stop asking permission for God-given rights, including the right to travel freely. Stop paying for licenses and permits. If they can't represent us, stop paying them. They are servants of the country and should help those in need.

I own 12,000 rental units using debt to minimize taxes. Taxation is seen as a Marxist concept, with progressive income tax aiding communism. America was tax-free until 1913 when the IRS was established. I legally avoid taxes, while hard workers face higher taxes, resembling communism. It's our duty as Americans to resist paying taxes, as outlined in the Communist Manifesto. Translation: I own 12,000 rental units using debt to minimize taxes. Taxation is seen as a Marxist concept, with progressive income tax aiding communism. America was tax-free until 1913 when the IRS was established. I legally avoid taxes, while hard workers face higher taxes, resembling communism. It's our duty as Americans to resist paying taxes, as outlined in the Communist Manifesto.

Sherry Peel Jackson, a former IRS agent and CPA, discovered that there is no law and that the IRS is the biggest fraud. She researched and found that no one could identify the section of the Internal Revenue Code that makes a typical worker liable for income tax. She also learned about the non-enforcement pocket commission she had as an administrative clerk. Sherry realized that the Federal Reserve is not federal and that income tax does not go towards running the country. She exposed these truths and educated people about the system. She emphasized the need to unite and understand what is happening with our money.