reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker states they are in litigation with 18 states across 19 different lawsuits over these states’ alleged refusal to comply. They say objections raised include privacy, noting they are requesting information such as the last four digits of individuals’ Social Security numbers and whether someone is in the country legally or a citizen, which they describe as a matter of federal records. The speaker asserts that the concept of this being a privacy issue is “total nonsense,” and argues that those states have no right to be on the voter rolls. They express an expectation to win these cases, even if it takes going to the Supreme Court. The speaker indicates they started this effort earlier in the year to give states a chance and mentions targeting jurisdictions like Fulton County, Georgia, which still has custody of some ballots from the 2020 election that they would like to examine, along with a couple of other jurisdictions. They say they reached a settlement with North Carolina, which is cleaning up its voter rolls with 100,000 records that were incorrect and needed updating. They mention they waited on behalf of Wyoming’s voter ID law and helped them win a case in court against liberal efforts to push it back. The speaker outlines an overall expectation for 2026: cleaner voter rolls, with many election officials, as noted by John, doing their job after receiving these letters. They anticipate hundreds of thousands of people in some states being removed from the voter rolls correctly. The speaker notes a past hesitation to act, suggesting it was because the DOJ and some left-wing organizations would sue when states attempted to do their job, framing it as “damned if you do, damned if you don’t.” They conclude that for the remainder of this administration, they will be supporting states in cleaning their voter rolls as required by federal law and emphasize that they are just getting started.

The Arizona Republican Party filed a lawsuit against the state's secretary of state for having 500,000 to 1.3 million ineligible voters on the rolls. The lawsuit revealed dead people and non-residents on the voter rolls, with some counties having more registered voters than eligible citizens. This highlights the need for election integrity. Republicans must address this issue before the upcoming elections to prevent cheating. It is crucial to purge voter rolls of deceased individuals to ensure fair elections. Democrats may argue otherwise, but it is clear that dead voters should not be on the rolls.

We demonstrated how easily election machines can be hacked, raising concerns about the limited number of companies controlling voting technology. 43% of American voters use machines with security flaws, and some states lack a paper trail to verify results. The lack of transparency in cybersecurity practices is alarming.

Maine's Secretary of State is being criticized for attempting to remove Donald Trump from a primary ballot. Critics believe this desperate move by Democrats to sway the election will not hold up in court. However, this action has inadvertently highlighted the weakness of Joe Biden's administration. Each attempt to disqualify Trump only boosts his popularity for a potential 2024 run.

Fulton County does not conduct independent searches to remove ineligible voters, such as deceased individuals, convicted felons, or those living out of state, from voter rolls.

A recent Heartland Rasmussen poll reveals some concerning statistics about voting behavior. According to the poll, 17% of individuals confessed to voting in a state where they do not reside. Additionally, 21% admitted to completing another person's ballot, while 8% acknowledged being offered money in exchange for their vote. These findings shed light on potential issues surrounding the integrity of the voting process.

Fulton County allegedly does not conduct independent searches to remove ineligible voters, such as deceased individuals, convicted felons, or those residing out of state, from voter rolls. The question is raised whether routine maintenance is performed to remove convicted felons from the voter list.

"we have sent out a number of letters to states, under two federal statutes." "We administer different statutes, Help America Vote Act and NVRA, National Voter Registration Act." "these acts have different purposes and different rules, but basically states are required to maintain certain data." "they're required to keep their voter rules generally up to date." "we're finding that a lot of states are being very sloppy, cutting corners, not doing this, certainly not doing the list maintenance required." "And too many millions of Americans today don't feel confident." "And that means it's deterring some people from voting." "We have sloppy maintenance requirements in these different states." "There are a lot of problems with this."

North Carolina, there are significant issues with voter registrations. Since the start of the year, there have been 499,566 total registrations. Notably, 110,462 lack information on race, sex, or ethnicity. Additionally, 149,699 do not have a North Carolina driver's license or ID, and 274,589 have no recorded birth state. This raises concerns about the integrity of the registration process.

We now know how elections are rigged, with Maricopa County mailing more ballots than voters. This shows extra ballots were printed to manipulate the election. States are avoiding scrutiny of ballots, and censorship of truth reveals we are on the right track.

A recent poll by Rasmussen revealed that 20% of mail-in ballots in the 2020 presidential election were deemed rigged or defective. This raises concerns about the fairness and honesty of the election. Many countries, including France, have already abandoned mail-in voting to address this issue. The Republican Party needs to take action and unite against the Democrats, who are known for their cheating tactics. The prevalence of cheating in elections is a disgrace.

Michigan voter data is described as a state secret that Jocelyn Benson is safeguarding from the federal government, with the speaker claiming she told authorities they can’t have it and contrasting this with the idea of not wanting the federal government to have your social security number. The speaker then alleges that Benson “gives our voter data away” to a nonprofit, and that she has done so since taking office in 2019. The nonprofit identified is the electronic registration information center, ERIC. The claim is not that Benson gives data away to ERIC per se, but that she spends taxpayer money to provide data to ERIC. The speaker contends that on television Benson presents herself as the guardian of voters’ data, while, in reality, she uses public funds to share it. After ERIC receives the voter data, the speaker says it is sent to another nonprofit, the Center for Election Innovation and Research, or CEIR. The common thread alleged between ERIC and CEIR is a liberal operative named David Becker, who is said to have founded both organizations. The speaker asserts that in 2020, Becker’s CEIR gave Benson’s nonprofit $12,000,000 on the eve of the election. The claim continues that Benson used part of this funding to purchase Jocelyn Benson campaign ads. The speaker notes that this year, Lansing Republicans attempted to pull Michigan out of ERIC, as eight other states had already left, but the Republicans could not secure the votes to do so. The transcript suggests that Republicans facing Benson in the governor’s race should make this a campaign issue. It is presented as an easy story on the campaign trail: Jocelyn Benson’s friends obtain Michigan voter data and are paid to manage it, while Michigan taxpayers fund both sides of the lawsuit between Benson and the U.S. Department of Justice. The speaker connects the financial support from CEIR to Benson’s nonprofit with the broader political dynamic involving Benson and the DOJ.

Mail-in ballots pose significant issues. Voter ID requirements are also contentious, with arguments against them often lacking clarity. It's perplexing why some oppose having ID, especially since it's required for many everyday activities, like obtaining a driver's license. Recently, Gavin Newsom signed a bill prohibiting inquiries about voter ID, raising questions about the rationale behind such a decision. In contrast, organizations like the Democratic National Convention require extensive identification for their events. If ID is necessary for various transactions, why not for voting, which is crucial? Many citizens, including Democrats, support voter ID, but some politicians resist it, possibly to maintain opportunities for fraud. Ultimately, the lack of voter ID raises concerns about the integrity of elections.

A recent poll by Rasmussen revealed that 20% of mail-in ballots in the 2020 presidential election were deemed rigged or defective. This suggests that the election was fraudulent and unfair due to the involvement of mail-in voting. Many countries, including France, have already eliminated mail-in voting to prevent cheating. The Republican Party needs to unite and take action against the Democrats, who are known for their extensive cheating. This situation is a disgrace.

Speaker 0 argues that illegal voting occurs with penalties in place, and asserts that it happens all the time. He contends that the claim of illegality not being widespread is not reliable, insisting that we do not know how widespread illegal voting is because it is not being detected. He describes the California voter registration process, noting on the section where a driver’s license number or the last four digits of a social security number are entered, there is a box underneath each one stating, “I don’t have one,” which allows a person to proceed to vote. He says this demonstrates that the notion of needing to present some form of identification to register to vote is not accurate and is not being implemented in California. Additionally, he states that people are being registered to vote at the DMV, and cites audits indicating that the DMV has improperly registered people, including illegal immigrants. He claims there is immunity in place that says if the DMV registers someone who is not eligible, they are immune from prosecution. Based on these points, he expresses the belief that there are not sufficient safeguards in place to detect and prevent people from committing voter fraud.

Maricopa County has been resistant to discussing signature verification during the Arizona audit because the signatures don't match.

Speaker 0 argued that illegal voting occurs and that the penalties in place are not deterring it; “It happens all the time, senator. It happens all the time. You're just saying it's not widespread. But I'm saying we don't know how spread it is because we don't detect it.” He pointed to California’s registration process, noting that on the registration website there is a box under the fields for the driver’s license and the last four of the social number that says, “I don't have one. I don't have one.” He stated that one is allowed to proceed to vote after checking that box, implying that the requirement to present some form of identification to register is not accurate. He added, “So this idea that you're not allowed to register to vote unless you present some sort of identification is not accurate. It's not true. It's not being implemented in the state of California.” Speaker 0 further claimed that people are being registered to vote at the DMV, and cited audits indicating that the DMV has improperly registered people, including illegal immigrants. He asserted that there is immunity in place that says if the DMV registers someone who is not eligible they are immune from prosecution. Based on these points, he expressed the view that there are not sufficient safeguards in place to detect and prevent people from committing voter fraud.

It is against the law for noncitizens to vote in federal elections. However, some states are not requiring proof of citizenship when noncitizens register to vote. Governor Glenn Youngkin in Virginia issued an executive order to clean up voting rules. The Biden administration's Department of Justice sued the governor and the Commonwealth of Virginia to try to prevent them from cleaning up their voter rolls. This creates doubt and concern because everyone should want the law to be followed.

Speaker 0 warns that what you’re doing is extremely dangerous, and questions why it is dangerous. Speaker 1 challenges this by asking why it would be dangerous, and clarifies that they are not saying people are voting in certain places, but that people are currently registered to vote there. Speaker 2 interjects, referencing a recent sweep around Fulton County. Speaker 1 reiterates: they see that people are currently registered to vote in places like empty lots and homeless shelters that closed ten years ago, and asks what the other speaker would do if they became secretary of state to address that. Speaker 0 responds that the other party will have to reply to conspiracy theories. Speaker 1 counters that it is not a conspiracy, describing it as a current situation: people are currently registered to vote there, and it’s possible to purchase voter rolls for $45 to verify this. They insist they are not saying people are voting there, but that people are currently registered to vote there, and they reference Jason as the person who can verify that. They further state they will gladly take the other speaker to see if it’s true, arguing that if someone is running for secretary of state, they are in charge of maintaining the voter rolls. Speaker 0 continues to label the claim as dangerous and as conspiracy theory. Speaker 1 again emphasizes that they are not alleging people are voting there, but that people are currently registered to vote there. They reiterate that it took $45 to purchase the voter rolls, and that the same could be done for Fulton County. They mention specific locations where people are allegedly registered to vote: empty lots and a MARTA bus station, and ask whether the other speaker will address that instead of labeling it conspiracy theories. They reference the existence of a death address, 205 Elm Street Northwest, described as an empty lot that one could visit to verify the claim. They ask whether the other speaker, as an elected official who might become secretary of state, cares about ensuring clean voter rolls in a county considered one of the most important in the United States. Speaker 0 maintains that the other party’s approach is dangerous. Speaker 1 repeats the core assertion: it’s not a conspiracy, it’s a current condition where people are registered to vote in empty lots, a MARTA bus station, and other locations, and stresses that the issue is about maintaining clean voter rolls. The exchange cycles through insistence that “people are currently registered to vote there,” the availability of voter-roll data for verification, and the imperative for someone who could be secretary of state to address the integrity of the rolls rather than dismissing the claim as conspiracy theory.

This graph shows Wisconsin vote totals, particularly a spike at 3:30 AM that raises questions. The issue stems from how absentee ballots are counted. I support allowing counties to count these ballots the day before, with equal observers from both parties, to avoid such sudden increases. This spike likely comes from Milwaukee Central Count, which faced significant operational issues, including a failure to seal a power outlet box, requiring the reprocessing of 30,000 ballots. Despite the chaos, election observers believed the results would be legitimate, though heavily favoring Democrats. A major concern in Wisconsin is the lack of maintenance on voter rolls, with 7.5 million registered voters compared to only 3.6 million eligible voters.

It is against the law for noncitizens to vote in federal elections. However, some states do not require proof of citizenship when noncitizens register to vote. Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin issued an executive order to clean up the state's voting rules. The Biden-Harris administration Department of Justice sued the governor and the Commonwealth of Virginia to prevent them from cleaning up their voter rolls. This creates doubt and concern in the minds of many Americans.

I was surprised to learn that there was no signature verification done for the ballots. I questioned how ballots without signatures were handled, and the response was they were just sent back out. This made me uncomfortable certifying the results.

A recent poll by Rasmussen suggests that 20% of mail-in ballots in the 2020 presidential election were rigged or defective, indicating a massive scam. The presence of mail-in ballots makes fair and honest elections impossible, as cheating is bound to happen. France and other countries have already eliminated mail-in voting to address this issue. The Republican Party needs to unite and take action against the Democrats, who cheat like never before. This situation is a disgrace.

Voting illegally happens frequently, despite penalties. In California, registering to vote online doesn't require ID. The DMV is registering people to vote, even illegal immigrants, with immunity from prosecution. Safeguards against voter fraud are lacking.

The office and the DOJ will revisit all 50 states to clean up voter rolls and ensure compliance with voter laws. Letters have been sent to states under two federal statutes—Help America Vote Act and the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA). These acts have different purposes and rules, but states must maintain data, keep rules up to date, and have procedures whereby people are registered for federal elections to safeguard that registrants are citizens. They are finding that many states are sloppy, cutting corners, not doing list maintenance, and not properly ensuring people are getting on the voter rolls in the first place. The goal is to clean that up so every citizen should feel confident in the election outcome; too many Americans don’t feel confident because of sloppy voter rolls.