reSee.it - Related Video Feed

As a child, the speaker received three vaccines. By 1986, children received 11 doses of five vaccines. Now, children in states with mandates may receive 69 to 92 vaccines between conception and age 18, with varying dose requirements depending on the brand. Each vaccine is designed to permanently alter the immune system. The speaker believes this contributes to an epidemic of immune dysregulation. The speaker suggests vaccines could be a key culprit in the rise of diseases like diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, seizure disorders, ADD, ADHD, speech delay, language delay, tics, Tourette's syndrome, narcolepsy, and autism, which the speaker claims were rare in their childhood. The speaker believes this generation is damaged by these diseases.

The speaker believes all vaccines are suspect. As an emergency medicine physician, the speaker thought vaccines only contained a dead or attenuated virus and saline. In September 2000, after reading a package insert and researching vaccines, the speaker was mortified to learn that a child receiving all scheduled vaccines gets almost 13,000 micrograms of aluminum, almost 600 micrograms of mercury, and over 200 chemicals. The speaker states that this is why vaccines have never been proven safe, and vaccination is like injecting foreign matter into a baby.

Speaker 0 contends that vaccination has always been a systematic poisoning of humanity. He traces this idea back to the era of smallpox, asserting that vaccines have long been made using sick animals, and that animal infections have been introduced into humanity through vaccination. He asserts that there is a barrier God put between humans and animals to prevent blood, pus, and biological mixing, and that this barrier is violated when substances are injected into muscles. He claims that the consequences of injecting such materials are dire. Regarding autoimmune concerns, Speaker 0 states that this phenomenon is not new and frames it as something that has not been previously encountered in this context. He mentions a scientist named Darja Kanduc (d a r j a k a n d u c), who he says has for years been publicly discussing autoimmune phenomena related to vaccines. He attributes Kanduc’s work to Italy, noting her criticism of various vaccines and the idea that there is an autoimmune response associated with them. Speaker 0 explains Kanduc’s position by describing how the immune system is designed to tolerate bacteria that we are naturally endowed with, unless those bacteria invade. In contrast, he says that injecting viruses, particles, and bacterial particles—along with adjuvants and other substances that cause inflammation—creates a situation in which autoimmune reactions are inherent. He emphasizes that this outcome is not universal for everyone, but he asserts that it is inherent to the process. In summary, Speaker 0 presents the view that vaccines introduce harmful biological material into the body, bypass natural barriers between humans and animals, and provoke autoimmune responses as an inherent consequence of injecting viral and bacterial components with inflammatory agents. He anchors this claim in Kanduc’s work, which he describes as highlighting the autoimmune phenomenon associated with vaccines and the immune system’s intolerance of externally introduced microbial particles, especially when adjuvants and inflammatory triggers are present.

You know, people go, oh, I'm allergic to ticks. You were injected with gelatin. That's why you're allergic to ticks. Tick goes to bite you because you were injected as a kid with gelatin, you have an allergic reaction. Why gelatin and ticks? How is that related? Something about the makeup of a tick and the gelatin. So I would assume something in their, like, skin. And when they go to bite you then when they put that into you, now what happens is their cells have transferred kinda into your cells, just kinda make it simple, and then you have that allergic reaction, but you don't actually have the Lyme. You know, Lyme is tested with a PCR test, number one, which is funny. And number two, you got EMF and heavy metal poisoning. It's wild how, like I said, everything gets flipped. You know, they target one thing and say it's the bug, but they don't say what's been injected into your body. They don't say the metal's going into your body, and they don't talk about the EMFs, are amplifying the metals. What is your favorite way of removing heavy metal or ways of removing heavy metals? We talked about chiluzhan and dragon's blood. Two of the best super foods to help pull things out, the fulvic acid and the tree sap, which is really beneficial. You can also get into organic moldy berry. Just one organic moldy blueberry, nice and simple. You can also do raw cream and raw butter, unpasteurized butter and cream. Fat is very good at pulling things out. People can look into turpentine. Turpentine is the old pine tree, you know, the sap of the pine tree, they can look into that. Doctor. Andrew Kaufman has a great protocol on that people can look into. You can get into the whole thing I've talked about with baking soda, you can get into Borax, you can get into grapefruits, the whole grapefruit one is a funny one. They tell you to stay away from the grapefruit. You know, big harm is always like, you know, don't don't don't eat the grapefruits. They interfere with the things we're trying to give you. Yeah. They're countering all of that. The other ones you can get into is apricot seeds. Big one as well too. I've been deleted many times for talking about that one.

The speaker expresses concern about vaccine adjuvants, particularly aluminum, and their potential link to allergies. They highlight the paradox of using inflammation-inducing substances to make vaccines work in a nonspecific way, especially when inflammation is generally considered harmful. The speaker argues that injecting aluminum to hyperactivate the immune system should necessitate specific instructions to minimize the risk of triggering reactions to non-pathogens, potentially leading to lifelong reactivity. They claim to have never heard such instructions being provided.

The transcript discusses the book Vaccinations Do Not Protect by Eleanor McBean, claiming that vaccination goes against the constitution to take this “garbage.” It asserts that most people don’t know that doctors do not take the shots themselves or give them to their own children, yet they administer them to other people’s children because they receive a commission. It notes that certain physicians have observed patterns such as paralysis within twenty-four hours after the injection, up to six months after, cancer near the injection area, and diseases such as TB within twenty years. The speaker claims that Edward Jenner, the father of vaccination, noticed a similar pattern in 1796, describing it as poisoning the people. The question is posed: why do they do this? The answer given is that vaccination is a big business, and that it is protected by the government. The speaker asserts that vaccination was protected by the government in 1986 so that people cannot sue. It is stated as part of the argument that vaccination is the leading cause of why children die under the age of 15.

The speaker believes current vaccines and mRNA-based vaccine designs cannot be safe enough. They compare vaccines to television or social media, stating that the business model and methods used to obscure safety signals invalidate the products. Upon learning that vaccines use adjuvants to hyperactivate the immune system, the speaker questioned its safety and connection to allergies. They highlight that vaccines are designed to cause inflammation to work. Using aluminum as an example, the speaker argues that injecting aluminum to hyperactivate the immune system should require detailed instructions to minimize the risk of triggering the immune system to react to non-pathogens, which could cause lasting reactivity. They state they have never heard of such instructions.

Speaker 0 states his position on vaccines has changed because he learned how they are produced. He had assumed they were produced reasonably, but discovered safety work had not been done. He says that in a book he completed in 2019, he listed vaccination as one of medicine's three great achievements, along with surgery and antibiotics. He now believes the mechanisms used by vaccine manufacturers and the methods used to obscure safety signals invalidate the products. Discovering that vaccines use a trick to hyper-activate the immune system to work, he questioned its safety and its connection to allergies. Speaker 0 says injecting aluminum to hyper-activate the immune system should come with instructions about what to avoid eating or seasons to avoid the shot, to minimize the likelihood of triggering the immune system to react to something that is not a pathogen. Speaker 1 summarizes this by saying the vaccine opens up the body so that anything present at the time can trigger an immune response.

The speaker makes a series of claims about peanuts, vaccines, and Pfizer. First, they assert that in the 1960s vaccines contained peanut oil, and that this was done so that when injected, people would become allergic. They state, “in the nineteen sixties they put peanut oil into the vaccines. Yes, that was Pfizer.” They further claim that Pfizer owns the EpiPen for peanut allergies, and that “not only did they inject the people to make them allergic, then they also own the solution that all the schools need to carry and all the things that need to go with that.” The speaker then discusses possible reasons for peanut allergies beyond oil in vaccines. They say that if someone isn’t allergic due to the peanut oil, it could be because the peanut has been processed with pesticides or sprayed with pesticides, since peanuts are in the ground when they grow. They add, “you might be allergic to the pesticides.” They suggest another factor is the processing of the peanut, noting that most peanut butters have been boiled and roasted, meaning they have been cooked twice before consumption, so they are not in their raw form. They offer guidance that if one desires raw peanuts, Virginia grows all the raw peanuts in the shell and claims they are “absolutely beautiful.” Additionally, the speaker asserts health benefits of peanuts, stating that the peanut “is really good for the prostate, ovaries, for the brain, for your testosterone, for your estrogen. It’s great for you pushing food through your stomach because you’ve got too much build up inside your stomach.” They then mention cancer contexts, claiming that peanuts can help with “the big C” and specify prostate cancer, breast cancer, and “intestinal cancers.” In summary, the speaker presents a narrative connecting vaccine peanut oil to peanut allergies and Pfizer’s ownership of the EpiPen, discusses potential allergy causes including pesticides and processing, promotes Virginia raw peanuts as an option, and asserts broad health benefits of peanuts for various organs and several cancers.

Here's something that people should know, is that aluminum provokes an allergic response, and that's why it's valuable. So if you put the aluminum in with the viral antigen, your body now mounts an allergic response to that viral antigen, whether it's polio or hepatitis B or the, you know, HPV or whatever. the alumina also creates allergic responses to anything that's in the ambient environment. So if you have a peanut oil excipient in that vaccine, you and you put aluminum in it, now you could have a lifetime allergy to peanuts. And, you know, there’s two studies by Mawson and Cowlings, which show that children who are vaccinated with aluminum vaccines have thirty times the rate of allergic rhinitis as kids who don't.

An outside expert analyzed data from 2,700 vaccinated and 560 unvaccinated patients in a medical practice. The study found that vaccinated patients had higher rates of asthma, allergic rhinitis, eczema, sinusitis, gastroenteritis, respiratory infections, otitis media, conjunctivitis, breathing issues, and behavioral issues like ADD and ADHD. The speaker claims that vaccines can shift the immune system towards allergy and autoimmunity, leading to more infections. The medical board responded by revoking the speaker's license. The speaker argues that the association between vaccines and health issues is not a coincidence, citing other studies and mechanisms of action like aluminum toxicity and immune activation from too many vaccines.

Speaker 0: "Your license has been emergently suspended. And I said, why? He says, well, they had an emergency meeting and you are a threat to public health." Speaker 1: "For doing science. For saying, hey, I just see a problem. I'm showing you the data." He adds, "I have a very large practice. Can show you the kids. I can show you all that data." They present, "The red line is those that are vaccinated. The blue line that are unvaccinated." They list conditions: "asthma. Allergic rhinitis. Breathing issues. ADHD." They claim, "it's almost completely a vaccine injury." They also mention "respiratory infections, ear pain, eye disorders, eczema," and note that "eczema... used to be considered a vaccine injury" and, "Don't vaccinate." "That's crazy." They conclude, "all these things that I've shown have shown with statistical significance in a very well done peer reviewed study that these are directly related."

Speaker 0 outlines a series of claims about mold, heavy metals, and vaccines. They begin by stating that people are eating a moldy organic beet because mold was injected to make someone allergic to it, arguing that the mold pulls out heavy metals. They claim that mold and parasites eat heavy metals, noting worms growing in the body to eat metals and mold growing in the body to eat metals, and that once the metals are eliminated, the body begins to heal. They assert that vaccinations contain heavy metals. The mold situation is described as connected to a spore, and they mention that the Cancer Institute discusses spores healing cancer, though they imply that this information is not widely told to people. The speaker adds that most vaccines also contain yeast, a form of mold, which is injected into the body to make people allergic to it so they cannot eat it to detox the metals. The conversation shifts to citric acid, labeled as something to avoid, described as a Monsanto product grown on soy and canola and aluminum, contributing heavy metals entering the body. The speaker acknowledges the possibility that someone might not want to eat organic moldy berries or similar items and then presents a list of additional detox approaches for heavy metals: dragon’s blood, organic papaya seeds, fasting, baking soda, borax, spirits of turpentine, cilantro, wormwood, and black walnut. They conclude with “And let's just leave it at this.” A historical claim is then made: in 1986, a rule was put in place to protect the vaccines, suggesting this is due to lawsuits that could bankrupt the vaccine manufacturers once the truth is known. The segment ends with a casual farewell: “Have a great day.”

Rats can be given food allergies by administering aluminum adjuvant from the hepatitis B vaccine along with a specific protein like peanut or dairy. This induces a permanent allergy to that protein. Vaccines not only contain aluminum adjuvant but also peanut oil excipients, potentially contributing to peanut allergies in a generation. The aluminum adjuvant can also trigger allergies to substances in the environment at the time of vaccination, such as Timothy weed. A study by Mawson indicates that vaccinated children have 30 times the rate of allergic rhinitis compared to unvaccinated children. The speaker claims that the prevalence of allergies in children is linked to the aluminum in vaccines.

Speaker 0: If you live in these parts of the country, which is practically half of The US, you should start taping up your legs like this guy every time you go outside. There's this tiny little bug called the Lone Star tick causing massive problems. A single bite from this guy reprograms your entire immune system causing Alpha gal syndrome, which makes you allergic to red meat, and it can be life threatening. Now, what's crazy to me is that these ticks have apparently been around for over two hundred years, but there was no recorded cases of Alpha gal syndrome until just about twenty years ago, and now we're seeing a hundredfold increase in cases. The official explanation is that these ticks are spreading because of climate shifts and growing deer populations, but I find it awfully ironic that the same people pushing the global warming agenda while simultaneously investing in the solutions for it are also pushing the agenda to eat lab made and plant based meat, which are miserably failing. We also know about Lyme disease, another devastating tick borne illness, and its relationship to Bioengineering Lab two fifty seven on Palm Island, just nine miles away from Lyme, Connecticut. Now, don't know about you, but it's interesting that as thousands of people are healing and feeling better incorporating red meat back into their diet, there just so happens to be this exploding population of ticks that could forever prevent you from eating it. Speaker 1: We can use human engineering to make it the case that we're intolerant to certain kinds of meat, to certain kinds of bovine proteins. And there's actually analogues of this in life. There's this thing called the long star tick, where if it bites you, you will become allergic to meat.

Speaker 0 expresses a belief that adverse events from regular vaccines occur more frequently than people imagine, including things like allergies. They state that their own allergy to wheat is likely the result of an adjuvant that caused their immune system to react to something normal in their gut in a way from which they feel they will never recover. They also mention that one of their sons has seasonal allergies that are significant enough to disrupt daily life, while another son has a dairy allergy that the speaker attributes to an allergy to mother's milk, which the speaker says they did not understand at the time but observed as the baby spit up regularly after breastfeeding. The speaker describes this dairy-related issue as a huge waste of a precious resource and questions whether evolution could be blamed for it, noting the expectation that ancestors would be starving and not surrender such nutrients if food were abundant. The speaker elaborates on their current interpretation by suggesting that the dairy allergy in their child was developed very early, probably from an adjuvant in a childhood vaccine. They use this line of reasoning to illustrate a broader point about their view of vaccines and safety testing. The long, winding explanation leads to the central claim: given the education they have received, if they could do everything again, they would choose not to give any vaccines to their newborn children. They make it clear that they are not asserting that it is impossible that some vaccines are more beneficial than harmful, but they state that they now know they cannot trust the safety testing. In the closing, the speaker asserts that even if there were indications that a vaccine might be net beneficial, they would be compelled to wonder what else they do not know. The overall message emphasizes a deep skepticism about safety testing and a belief that current knowledge is insufficient to justify vaccinating newborns, as presented by Speaker 0.

Speaker 0 discusses claims about peanuts, vaccines, and Pfizer. The speaker asserts that in the 1960s, peanut oil was put into vaccines, and that when injected, people would become allergic to peanuts. The speaker names Pfizer as the company behind both the vaccine claim and the ownership of the EpiPen for peanut allergies, stating that Pfizer “owns the EpiPen for the peanut allergies” and that they also control the schools’ required equipment and supplies related to peanut allergies. The discussion then shifts to alternative explanations for peanut allergies. The speaker suggests that if peanut oil didn’t cause the allergies, the allergy could be due to peanuts being processed with pesticides or chemicals, as peanuts are in the ground when grown. They propose that pesticide exposure could be the culprit and note that many people who react to peanuts might be reacting to pesticides rather than peanut oil itself. Next, the speaker argues that peanut processing contributes to allergies, noting that peanut butters are typically boiled and roasted, meaning they are cooked twice before consumption, implying they are not raw peanuts. The speaker mentions Virginia as a place that grows raw peanuts in the shell and claims these raw peanuts are “absolutely beautiful.” The speaker then extols the purported health benefits of peanuts, claiming they are good for the prostate, ovaries, brain, testosterone, and estrogen, and that they aid digestion by moving food through the stomach. They extend these claims to cancer, asserting that peanuts can help with prostate cancer, breast cancer, and various intestinal cancers. Overall, the transcript blends allegations about a vaccine-induced peanut allergy linked to Pfizer and the EpiPen with hypotheses about pesticide exposure and peanut processing as allergy causes, and concludes with asserted health benefits and cancer-related claims associated with peanuts.

According to the speaker, vaccines have never been tested in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate their safety. The speaker claims that vaccines contain aluminum compounds because many dead vaccines don't mount an immune response without them. The speaker alleges that in a Gardasil vaccine study, the placebo group received an aluminum adjuvant instead of a true placebo, so the side effect profiles of the active vaccine and placebo groups were the same. The speaker asserts that Merck used a novel aluminum compound and that data shows aluminum in vaccines is toxic. The speaker states that the only completely randomized controlled trial was on sheep using a vaccine for blue tongue disease. The speaker claims the aluminum was toxic, the sheep became sick, their behavior changed, and many died compared to the placebo group. The speaker concludes that the presumption that aluminum as an adjuvant is safe is unfounded and has never been tested.

Here's something that people should know, is that aluminum provokes an allergic response, and that's why it's valuable. So if you put the aluminum in with the viral antigen, your body now mounts an allergic response to that viral antigen, whether it's polio or hepatitis B or the, you know, HPV or whatever. So if you have a peanut oil excipient in that vaccine, you and you put aluminum in it, now you could have a lifetime allergy to peanuts. They take the aluminum adjuvant from the hepatitis B vaccine, add a latex molecule, and that rat now has a permanent latex allergy. You add a peanut molecule and it has a permanent peanut allergy.

The speaker finds it difficult to find someone who hasn't been damaged by the vaccine, and even senior consultant colleagues haven't connected their ailments to the vaccine. The speaker claims the vaccine causes autoimmune diseases, of which there are 131 types, all reportedly linked to the vaccine. Individually, these appear as coincidences, but collectively, a high percentage of vaccinated people suffer from one or more autoimmune conditions. The speaker is annoyed by their GP practice constantly pushing boosters, even knowing their views, suggesting they are incentivized by payment. The speaker believes that if the practice adhered to "first do no harm," they would refuse to administer the vaccines.

An expert conducted a study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated patients in a medical practice. The results showed that vaccinated children had higher rates of asthma, allergic rhinitis, eczema, sinusitis, gastroenteritis, respiratory infections, otitis media, conjunctivitis, breathing issues, and behavioral issues like ADD and ADHD. The speaker mentions that vaccines may shift the immune system towards allergy and autoimmunity, leading to more infections. The speaker also claims that the medical board revoked their license in response to this study. They argue that the association between vaccines and health issues is not a coincidence, citing other studies and explaining the mechanism of action involving aluminum.

DDT was in widespread use as a pesticide when polio cases were prevalent. DDT is no longer used in America, but it is still used in other countries where polio-like symptoms are common. One of the effects of DDT poisoning is polio-like symptoms, called encephalopathy. Polio was something that was going on in the early part of the twentieth century, and it's widely credited that the polio vaccine is what stopped that. The speaker questions the general narrative that vaccines are an amazing cure. They believe there are other factors, such as hygiene. The book "Dissolving Illusions" is about the origins of vaccines, what vaccines have done to stop disease spread, and the negative side effects. There are side effects to vaccines, and they don't want to advertise those problems. One person was addicted to the COVID vaccine and did seven inoculations. A doctor told a lady in the neighborhood to stop getting boosted, but she wanted to go to LA to get boosted.

The speaker presents a series of claims about mold, heavy metals, and vaccines, framing them as interconnected health dangers and detox strategies. They begin by describing eating a moldy organic beet and claim that mold was used to make someone allergic to it because “the mold pulls out the heavy metals.” They state, “Mold and parasites eat heavy metals,” and claim that “worms growing in your body to eat the metals” and “mold growing in your body to eat the metals” can be found, with healing occurring once heavy metals are eliminated. The speaker asserts that vaccinations contain heavy metals. They then say, “what’s also interesting on the mold situation is it’s connected to a spore,” and claim that “if you go to the Cancer Institute, they talk about how spores heal cancer, but I guess they don’t wanna tell people that.” The discussion deepens with the claim that most vaccines also contain yeast, “a form of mold,” which is being injected into the body to make people allergic to it so they can’t eat it to detox the metals. When addressing cautions about food, someone asks about citric acid, described as “the one to avoid.” The speaker asserts it is “a Monsanto product grown on soy and canola and aluminum,” implying heavy metals enter the body through this product. The speaker then offers detox alternatives for heavy metals, listing: dragon’s blood, organic papaya seeds, fasting, baking soda, borax, spirits of turpentine, cilantro, wormwood, and black walnut. They conclude with a brief historical note: “1986, they put a rule in place to protect the vaccines,” suggesting it was due to lawsuits that could bankrupt vaccine makers, and sign off with “Have a great day.” In summary, the transcript presents a chain of claims that mold and parasites target heavy metals in the body, vaccines contain heavy metals and possibly yeast, spores are linked to healing cancer, citric acid from Monsanto products is a heavy-metal source, and a set of natural and chemical detox methods is proposed. It also asserts a regulatory measure in 1986 intended to shield vaccine manufacturers from lawsuits.

Speaker 0 raises a concern about the vaccine, asking why every new paper or study seems to claim the vaccine is responsible for a new problem. The question posed is whether the vaccine is really responsible for every negative outcome discussed in the literature, noting rises in cancers and cognitive decline. The speaker questions the blanket attribution of all adverse effects to the vaccine. Speaker 1 responds by suggesting that the world’s population has been poisoned, stating that the protein was devised in the Chinese security lab in Wuhan, China. The speaker claims it is not a natural protein and is not supposed to be in the body. They assert that one can obtain spike protein from having the infection, which almost everyone has had, and from taking the vaccine. The speaker contends that “it’s almost as if we’ve all been poisoned.” They further claim that the spike protein stays in the body and causes disease, listing several specific adverse outcomes: heart disease, neurologic disease, autoimmunity, blood clots, and maybe even cancer.

Speaker 0 argues that adverse events from regular vaccines are far more common than people imagine, including allergies. They state their personal allergy to wheat is likely the result of an adjuvant that caused their immune system to react to something normal in their gut in a way from which they will never be free. They also point to their children: one son has significant seasonal allergies that interfere with daily life, and another son has an allergy to dairy which they believe goes back to an allergy to mother's milk, noting that he spit up regularly after breastfeeding and that this perplexed them at the time. They describe this as a huge waste of a precious resource and remark that it seems like evolution messed up, especially given that ancestors faced scarcity and would not want to surrender nutrients when food was plentiful. They now think that the dairy allergy developed very early, probably from an adjuvant in a childhood vaccine. In tying these observations together, Speaker 0 uses their education and what they describe as painful education to make a concluding point. If they could start over, they would not give any vaccines to their newborn children. They clarify that they are not claiming it is impossible that some vaccines could be more beneficial than they are harmful, but they now know that they cannot trust safety testing. Therefore, even if there were indications that something might be net beneficial, they would have to wonder what is hidden or not known. Overall, the speaker presents a personal narrative linking vaccines to the development of allergies in themselves and their children, uses this to argue a broader distrust of vaccine safety testing, and concludes that, given their current understanding, they would choose not to vaccinate newborns despite acknowledging that some vaccines might be beneficial in certain scenarios. The emphasis is on perceived higher-than-expected adverse events, potential connections to adjuvants, the impact on allergies, and a strong reevaluation of newborn vaccination decisions based on safety testing concerns.