TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

There was no pandemic; data shows all-cause mortality did not rise before the WHO's declaration. The real public health emergency stemmed from government actions. Inappropriate PCR tests misled people into thinking they had a specific disease, while harmful medical procedures led to unnecessary deaths in hospitals and care homes. Many were denied life-saving antibiotics, resulting in bacterial pneumonia deaths. The claim of a pandemic justified rushed vaccine development, which is impossible within the stated timeframe. Manufacturing complex biological products typically takes years, and what was administered was likely a toxic substance. This narrative allowed for mass vaccinations, with millions reportedly dying as a result.

A scientist with expertise in various fields claims that the COVID-19 pandemic is intense propaganda and there is no evidence of a particularly virulent pathogen spreading. They argue that all-cause mortality data shows no pandemic, with any increase in deaths being due to how people were treated in hospitals and care homes. The scientist also asserts that global warming is not occurring and that vaccines are toxic, causing an increase in mortality rates. They claim to have studied over 100 countries and found a correlation between vaccines and peaks in all-cause mortality. The scientist concludes by stating that their work is challenging the establishment scientists who they believe are lying and part of the propaganda industry.

there wasn't a pandemic, there wasn't a public health emergency, there was nothing unusual happening. they called a pandemic with no evidence of a pandemic, because they were lying to you. there is nowhere in the world you can find increased frequency of respiratory illness and respiratory deaths anywhere until after the WHO called a pandemic. by using misusing a test that doesn't measure what it says, PCR. there's literally what we had is a pandemic of rollout of the test. it's not a mistake. they they knew it was rubbish. they designed it to produce positives where there was no illness. and then when people died, they said, oh, they had COVID. they called the pandemic, and then the data started arriving, which was fraudulent. if you go and look for it, you'll not find the evidence. for these pandemics, they just lied to you.

Denis Roncourt, a researcher with Correlation, Research in the Public Interest, presents his expert witness testimony at the National Citizens Inquiry in Canada. He discusses his scientific expertise in areas such as nanoparticles, molecular science, statistical analysis, mathematical modeling, and measurement methods. Roncourt argues that the study of all-cause mortality shows there was no pandemic causing excess mortality, but rather the measures and COVID-19 vaccination campaigns caused excess mortality. He presents data on all-cause mortality in the United States, Canada, and Australia, highlighting correlations with poverty and vaccine rollouts. Roncourt also discusses the potential for vaccines to cause death, presenting autopsy studies and evidence of adverse effects. He estimates that there have been 13 million deaths worldwide induced by vaccines.

According to the speaker, the all-cause mortality data contradicts the idea of a viral respiratory pandemic. They argue that spikes in mortality during the COVID period were due to assaults on vulnerable people through medical treatment. Different jurisdictions had different methods of assault, such as overusing HCQ or using ventilators. They claim that more than half the countries in the world had no excess mortality until the vaccines were rolled out, which resulted in a surge of deaths. Even in India, there was no excess mortality until the vaccines were introduced, causing a significant increase in deaths.

In recent years, global mortality rates have been lower compared to the past 50 years, with a spike in 2018 due to new vaccines. Despite claims of a deadly pandemic, mortality rates have remained lower than in 1952. People were getting sick, but not dying at alarming rates. This raises questions about the severity of the pandemic.

The test for COVID-19 cannot differentiate between live and dead matter, only detecting fragments of viruses, leading to guaranteed false positives. This was used to create cases for a public health emergency, enabling the use of untested vaccines. There are claims that true isolates of viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, do not exist; the viral genomes are only computer-generated. Historical evidence from the 1918 influenza pandemic shows no proof of transmission, as attempts to infect volunteers failed. Current symptoms attributed to COVID-19 may arise from various factors, including environmental toxins and EMF exposure, rather than a specific virus. The idea of a virus causing disease is questioned, and the evidence for SARS-CoV-2 remains unproven.

Speaker 0 argues that the test cannot distinguish live from dead matter, only analyzes fragments and is set up to guarantee false positives, which the speaker claims was used to create case numbers for declaring a public health emergency of international concern and to enable untested drugs or vaccines to be used on people. Speaker 1 adds that the biggest lie may be that true viral isolates are unavailable, noting that the claimed genome of SARS-CoV-2 exists only in silico as a computer-programmed genome. The speaker says fear is created to control people, describing “fake mythical flying unicorns” that make us sick and asserting that disease is constructed rather than evidenced by visible agents. They claim that there is no evidence of transmission or isolations supporting the idea of a pathogen causing disease in the usual sense. The speaker references Andrew Kaufman, Doctor Cowan, Stephen Lunk, and others to support the claim that, after a year of pandemic conditions, there is no virus proven through traditional means, including in the 1918 influenza pandemic. They state that volunteers were exposed to sputum from infected individuals, or to the sputum directly, without becoming ill; some experiments involved injecting processed material, which also did not cause illness. They note that horses did not consistently transmit illness when exposed to similar materials, and conclude that influenza does not originate from a Latin term for a virus but means “influence,” suggesting historical transmission evidence is weak. The speakers discuss that we do not have approved evidence of transmission, a virus, a test, or autopsies; what exists is a syndrome of symptoms—flu-like symptoms without pathognomonic signs. They propose several alternative causes for COVID-19–like illness, including transmissibility that appears real but isn’t, radiation effects, and other non-disease explanations. Speaker 1 references Dr. Cowan’s book Contagion to illustrate how radiation exposure in mines could mimic disease transmission, where illness is not truly infectious. They argue that non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) and exposure to graphene oxide toxicity (claimed to be present in vaccines and referred to as viral-based genetic therapies by the FDA) could produce COVID-like symptoms. They also acknowledge an artificially created spike protein in a lab as a known factor. However, they reiterate that there is no evidence for the mythical SARS-CoV-2 virus as a causative agent. In summary, the dialogue challenges the existence of proven SARS-CoV-2 isolates, questions the validity of tests and transmission evidence, and proposes alternative explanations for the illness, including EMF toxicity, graphene oxide toxicity, and lab-made spike proteins, while highlighting a lack of definitive proof for traditional viral causation.

There was never a scientific consensus on many topics related to COVID-19. Before the pandemic, most scientists held views contrary to the prevailing narrative. A small group of influential scientific bureaucrats took control of the public discourse, dominating media and influencing politicians. This led to a catastrophic response to the pandemic, and the repercussions will be felt for a long time.

The speaker believes that the combination of a respiratory illness and fear induced by the media led to unnecessary deaths in Italy, the US, and the UK. They claim that patients were put on inappropriate doses of sedatives and antiviral drugs, leading to fatalities. The speaker, with a background in respiratory illnesses, concludes that the excessive deaths in care homes were a result of deliberate actions by the state.

COVID-19 vaccinations protect children from severe illness and reduce community spread, which goes against the science. Only 15 children between 0-19 years old died during the pandemic. Increased death tolls and adverse events arose after the COVID shots were rolled out. Before that, there was no pandemic, and children who died had serious comorbidities. Positive PCR tests were fraudulent due to high cycle thresholds between 40-45, leading to many false positives, making the test useless. The test's creator stated before his 2019 death that it was not designed to diagnose viral illnesses.

There was no pandemic, as all-cause mortality data did not increase, and the WHO fraudulently declared one. An inappropriate PCR test was used, giving the false impression of a novel disease. People were mistreated via mass ventilation, sedatives and respiratory depressants in care homes, and denial of antibiotics, leading to deaths from bacterial pneumonia. Since there was no pandemic, experimental medical interventions were unnecessary. It is impossible to rapidly invent, test, and manufacture a complex biomedical product; the fastest record was six years. What was done was the advancement of intentionally toxic materials, rushed and injected into people, resulting in millions of deaths. The lie of a pandemic was maintained to inject billions with an intentionally dangerous substance, resulting in 17 million deaths so far.

"there wasn't a pandemic, there wasn't a public health emergency, there was nothing unusual happening." "In order for an emergency to be declared, which I think he did in 2020, March, whatever it was, He has to have some evidence of that." "There is nowhere in the world you can find increased frequency of respiratory illness and respiratory deaths anywhere until after the WHO called a pandemic." "They called a pandemic with no evidence of a pandemic." "They were lying to you." "Then they created the we, all our governments, created the impression of a pandemic by using misusing a test that doesn't measure what it says, PCR." "It's not a mistake. They they knew it was rubbish." "It's as simple as that." "If you go and look for it, you'll not find the evidence."

Speaker 0 asserts that there is a new leading cause of death and disease in almost every country worldwide, with the exception of regions that have not taken the shot as aggressively—specifically mentioning Africa and a few Eastern European countries like Bulgaria and Latvia as the only places where death is less than expected. He states that since COVID and the vaccines, there has been an excess mortality of six percent, describing it as dramatic. He argues that if governments were legitimate, and they perceived a six percent excess mortality, they would come together to address it, rather than collaborate in a “scam on the population with the coronavirus operation,” which he claims was funded under the previous administration. He mentions Anthony Fauci in connection with this sentiment, describing Fauci in a way that aligns with the view that the response to the pandemic included a push for vaccination and other measures. The speaker then references Paul Alexander, described as an epidemiologist from Canada who was hired by Trump as an adviser. He asserts that Alexander “gave Trump very different advice” from what he characterizes as the prevailing or leg-based approach, which included opposition to lockdowns and other interventions. The speaker paraphrases Alexander’s alleged guidance as: don’t lock down the population, don’t put diapers on people’s faces, don’t try to vaccinate Rio of the pandemic, calling these positions insane. He also says, “Oh, and by the way, it’s not really a pandemic.” Regarding personal connections, he notes: “I haven’t met Donald Trump myself personally. I cannot give you any personal feedback on my friend Paul Hess and he said, he’s a good man and he was due by Fauci,” adding a brief, non-specific personal comment about Paul Hess, and promising a bit of feedback on that matter.

The existence of the virus is questioned due to the initial PCR test methodology being based on a computer model virus, not a purified isolate from real patients. China did not have a pure isolate, so they used elements of a genetic code to create a computer model sequence. This sequence became the basis for the PCR test. The WHO document states that the diagnosis of SARS CoV-2 should not rely on isolating the virus. The virus has never been purified, and the disease is based on generic symptoms that could be anything.

Patients are dying not from COVID, but from treatments like remdesivir causing organ failure. One person's mother died after being given remdesivir against their wishes, leading to organ shutdown. There was a financial incentive for hospitals to admit patients and put them on ventilators, resulting in unnecessary treatments and deaths.

There were simultaneous peaks of mortality in different parts of the world during the pandemic, which is highly unlikely from an epidemiological perspective. The time it takes for an infection to lead to a rise in mortality varies greatly depending on various factors. Even if infections were spread simultaneously, mortality peaks would not occur synchronously. These peaks were likely caused by specific actions taken in hotspots, such as Lombardy, Italy, where people were encouraged to go to the hospital and multiple patients were put on a single ventilator. This resulted in a significant loss of life during that peak.

Many people who died with a COVID diagnosis were already in a fragile state, where even a minor infection could be fatal. However, it is questionable whether these infections should be considered the cause of death. For example, if we started registering every urinary tract infection that pushed a frail person over the edge, we would have an epidemic of urinary tract infections. The same kind of illogical attribution happened with COVID, where 3,000 expected deaths in hospices were attributed to the virus. This raises the question of what a death certificate should actually indicate: the specific cause of death on a particular day, or the overall cause of death within a certain timeframe.

Governments worldwide intentionally suppressed early treatment for COVID-19, causing fear, suffering, hospitalization, and death. This controversial narrative aimed to harm citizens simultaneously. Disturbingly, doctors in the Netherlands admitted to euthanizing seniors with lethal doses of morphine instead of treating the virus. Similar occurrences were reported in Africa and South America. The bizarre behavior observed globally during the pandemic was not limited to the United States.

This pandemic is a complete fake. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) and the ethics committee, a pandemic is defined by the number of excess deaths and severe cases of an unknown or known disease. However, reports from Professor Toubiana and Professor Yoanniedis show that there were no excess deaths in France in 2020 compared to previous years. They argue that the PCR test, which replaced doctors, is a fraudulent tool that cannot diagnose anything. They claim that the PCR test is being used to justify lockdowns, economic shutdowns, and vaccinations. They also argue that the flu and other diseases have disappeared. They encourage people to question and challenge these fraudulent practices.

Dennis Rancourt and his team in Canada analyzed all-cause mortality in correlation with various factors. They found flaws in a peer-reviewed publication that claimed 14 million lives were saved by vaccines. Using advanced statistics, they discovered that there were actually 17 million deaths attributable to the vaccine. By comparing different nation states and calculating the percent uptake of vaccines, they determined the excess all-cause mortality attributed to the vaccines. This contradicts the Nobel Prize Committee's claim of 14 million lives saved.

The document titled COVID world 10/09/2022 presents estimates alleging that over a three-year period the SARS-CoV-2 virus and vaccine bioweapons caused 31 million extra deaths and 1.9 billion serious adverse effects. Two main changes from the prior 10/01/2022 estimates are highlighted: (1) 11 additional countries (about 600,000,000 people) were added to the estimate base, bringing the total to 47 countries for roughly 2,300,000,000 people, making the estimates more representative globally; (2) for serious adverse effects, the extra deaths of 2021 and 2022 are fully included as input rather than half as in the previous estimates. Extra deaths for 2020, 2021, and 2022 are described as based on officially reported and factual deaths in the listed countries. Data sources are referenced to Our World in Data. Extra deaths (ED) for each year are calculated as the difference between the factual number of total deaths and the expected deaths. Missing months in 2022 are estimated by extrapolating the monthly average from January 2021 onward. The yearly evolution uses a corrected five-year average (2015–2019). A yearly correction factor of 0.75% is applied, with 2020 ED having the factor applied three times, 2021 ED four times, and 2022 ED five times, effectively representing excess deaths after adjusting for expected yearly evolution and for a year without mass vaccination or bioweapons. To compute the 2020 world ED, the ED per 100,000 people by country (ED100 ks) is calculated and aggregated to 112 extra deaths per 100,000 people, yielding nine million extra deaths worldwide in 2020—the first year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. For 2021, the metric ED21M (extra deaths per million doses) is calculated and aggregated to 961 extra deaths per million doses, resulting in twelve point one million extra deaths globally in 2021—the first year with the vaccine bioweapon and the second year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. For 2022, ED22M yields 763 extra deaths per million doses, leading to nine point six million extra deaths worldwide in 2022—the second year with the vaccine bioweapon and third year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. The serious adverse effects are estimated by multiplying the estimated extra deaths in 2021 and 2022 by a reported adverse effects-to-deaths ratio of 87.6, derived from an article on estimated probabilities after COVID vaccination. This results in an estimated 1.1 billion serious adverse effects for 2021 and 0.8 billion for 2022. The document asserts, in strong terms, that there are about ten million extra deaths yearly worldwide since 2020, which would total about 110 million extra deaths by the end of 2030 if continued. It also claims that the mass propaganda, corrupted science, censorship, and elites lead many to think SARS-CoV-2 is a naturally evolved virus, while the document asserts truthful science shows the virus is designed and made by humans in a biolab, citing genetic insertions such as PRRA (HIVGP120) and arguing these inserts are not natural mutations. It references documents, testimonies, patents, and scientists (e.g., Doctor Richard M. Fleming, and Montanier) to support the claim that the virus and vaccines are lab-made bioweapons and contain harmful components, including the spike protein, with assertions about the vaccines’ toxicity and contamination. Sources and data are attributed to Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count, with a note to download the CSV from Our World in Data. The piece includes several prompts to view additional images and cites the article COVID World 10/09/2022 by Pak Osmol (10/09/2022) and Appendix A Data Source.

There was no pandemic. The all-cause mortality data did not increase before the WHO's fraudulent declaration. The PCR test was inappropriately used, creating a false impression of a specific disease. People were mistreated via mass ventilation, sedatives and respiratory depressants in care homes, and denial of antibiotics. Based on this lie, we were told vaccines would save us, but there was no pandemic, so no rushed intervention was needed. It's impossible to invent, test, and manufacture a complex biomedical product so quickly. What was done was the advancement of intentionally toxic materials, sketchily advanced and injected into people, with millions dead as a result. The lie of a pandemic was maintained to inject five and a half billion people with a dangerous substance, resulting in seventeen million deaths so far.

In the early pandemic, 2020–2021, eighty six percent of PCR-confirmed COVID cases were not real infections. The speaker asserts that all of the lockdowns, all of the vaccine mandates, and all of those policies that destroyed livelihoods and the economy were based on a completely fraudulent metric. A study is described that compared PCR positive rates by week to the actual antibody testing in the same weeks, noting that the antibody test indicates whether you got antibodies to COVID. The speaker states that only fourteen percent had actual antibodies among those PCR positive cases. It is claimed that it may even be up to ninety percent weren't real infections. The speaker concludes that this fraud is confirmed and calls for accountability for all the people who lost their jobs and were forced to take injections based on this fear campaign, which was based on this false test.

Governments implemented measures during the pandemic that can be seen as assaults, resulting in excess mortality in various jurisdictions. The impact varied, with some places experiencing significant deaths while others had fewer. Additionally, the COVID-19 vaccination campaign itself led to excess mortality. This was evident in the peaks of deaths directly linked to different vaccine rollouts for various age groups and in different regions. The connection between the vaccines and deaths is undeniable, as there is clear evidence of the vaccines causing a significant number of fatalities.