TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

According to cell phone data, a claimed 30,000 attendees at an event was closer to 24,000. Many attendees had been to 20+ progressive events, and some were allegedly paid to attend, receiving money, transportation, and signs. One speaker said they would attend a Kamala Harris rally for $400 when they were younger and would support her without political conviction. Another example cited was people getting paid $1,000 to protest Tesla, with rules of engagement provided, including guidance on physical altercations. One speaker questioned why violence was even on the table if it was a peaceful protest and wondered who pro-Tesla protesters would engage with besides the police. Another speaker said that destroying language makes violence seem logical if you believe the opposition is Nazis. The first speaker said they would be hesitant to take $1,000 to protest Tesla because of the risk of arrest.

A person confronts a group arriving by bus to protest Trump in Washington D.C. The person accuses the group of being an "AstroTurfed" crowd, implying they are not an authentic, grassroots movement. The person questions if they know what International Workers' Rights Day is, calling it "Socialist day." The confrontation escalates with insults exchanged. The person threatens physical violence.

A journalist is recording people marching against Trump. The journalist asks if Reid Hoffman and George Soros paid them to be there. The journalist states they can document stuff on the street and that the people got busted and are paid. One of the people tells the journalist to get out of here and leave, stating they are not welcome. The journalist claims to live there, but the other person repeats that they live in the city and demands the journalist leave.

The speakers discuss what they describe as a staged gathering. Speaker 0 asserts that a bus has arrived to pick up people who had been dropped off in Boston to create the impression of a large crowd, claiming that those shown are not from Massachusetts and were bused in from other cities. Speaker 0 points to the people and states that none of them are locals, insisting, “See? All these people are not from Massachusetts.” Speaker 1 identifies a person in the crowd as one of the participants from the No Kings rally, and points out the individual wearing a yellow hat, asking which one she is. Speaker 0 confirms, acknowledging the presence of “the No Kings on the rally,” and continues to label the attendees in the area as “paid people.” He insists that these are all paid individuals, saying, “These are all the paid people here that get paid to work here,” and adds “Soross” in reference to funding sources, instructing others to “Get their faces” so they can recognize them when “kings comes.” He repeats that “All paid. Okay. Every one of them. Okay. You see?” The dialogue then returns to the logistical detail of the bus. Speaker 0 describes the scenario by asking, “What’s the bus? What’s From Worcester?” and Speaker 1 confirms that the group had come from Worcester. Speaker 0 reacts with acknowledgment, “They came from Worcester. Oh, my big. Good,” and Speaker 1 responds with an affirmation about Worcester’s involvement. They note that Worcester is “here coming into Boston,” indicating activity from Worcester and the broader region, with Speaker 0 remarking that “the Western” and “Worcester” are present in Boston, having “came to visit Boston from the West.” Throughout, the speakers emphasize a narrative that the crowd consists of non-locals, who were transported to create the appearance of broad support. They identify specific actors in the crowd, mention the No Kings rally, and repeatedly stress the notion that the attendees are paid and organized, while noting Worcester’s role in supplying people to the event. The exchange centers on verifying the origins of the crowd, the identity of participants, and the logistics of the bus transportation from Worcester to Boston.

According to the speakers, an event claiming 30,000 attendees actually had 24,000 based on cell phone data. A large number of attendees had been to 20+ events, suggesting they were paid. The speakers allege people are being paid to attend events, provided with signs, and given free food. One speaker said they would attend a Kamala Harris rally for $400 when they were younger, even without political conviction. The speakers claim people were offered $1,000 to protest Tesla, with rules of engagement provided, including instructions on physical engagement. One speaker questions why violence is even on the table if it's a peaceful protest. They suggest that if people believe their opponents are Nazis, violence seems logical. The speakers express reservations about offering $1,000 for protesting, citing potential legal consequences.

An individual went undercover at an Atlanta Tesla protest to investigate claims that protesters are paid, and to understand the reasons for protesting. The majority of protesters appeared to be white boomers, some with their parents, and did not fit the demographic of paid protesters or disenfranchised MAGA voters. Although the protesters may not be directly paid, the organizers likely are. Radical leftist groups, some funded by George Soros, are organizing the protests. One group, Invisible Project, received $7.6 million from George Soros to boycott anything related to President Trump. While Elon Musk's claim of paid protesters may be partially inaccurate, the organizers are likely receiving payment.

The transcript centers on allegations that Naftali Aaron Kranz is a paid protester and that a group called GetFree recruits and deploys paid demonstrators. A journalist questions whether there is someone they can speak to, and the conversation suggests the person of interest is on the other side of a park. The speaker asserts that Naftali Aaron Kranz is “a paid protester through and through,” and that he posts on LinkedIn to hire paid protesters for GetFree, a company advertising itself as a grassroots organization while paying people to protest. GetFree is described as hiring for part-time mobilization support contractors, seeking individuals with four-plus years of experience in leading direct action, large-scale mobilizations, demonstrations, and civil disobedience (which is described as experience getting arrested). Compensation is reportedly 3,500 to 4,200 dollars per month for an average of twenty hours per week. The speaker claims GetFree’s stated mission is to undo white supremacy, despite the assertion that Kranz and others are paid to protest. The narrative highlights Kranz’s participation in protests, including celebrating vandalism, with an example cited of “Crown Heights stay winning” after an egg was thrown at a stranger’s cyber truck and dog feces placed on it. The speaker places Kranz at an abolish-the-police rally, noting he is not leading the protest but blending in with recruits, enabling a later photo op. The claim is that this recruitment tactic blends various leftist causes to inflate the appearance of each individual cause. The speaker also states Kranz works with the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) and was encountered at a DSA Tax the Rich rally. LinkedIn activity is cited again, with Kranz posting about paid protester roles and recruiting nationwide in Chicago, the Bay Area, and Baltimore to expand turnout at events. When clicking a linked job posting, the contract is described as nine weeks, part-time, paying about 3,400 dollars in stipends issued biweekly, with responsibilities including recruiting and training people to drive turnout. The speaker identifies Nicole Cardi at the top of the Get Free movement and attributes a belief that George Floyd protests were a factor in Biden’s 2020 victory. The transcript connects protest NGOs to political goals, claiming donations to Get Free are funneled through ActBlue, which the Department of Justice is investigating for foreign contributions. It also asserts ActBlue funds activists like Indivisible Twin Cities, which allegedly orchestrates resistance to ICE agents in Minneapolis and has been paid protesters, receiving over 7.6 million dollars from Open Society Foundation, funded by George Soros. The speaker concludes with a personal note to stay away, and the journalist states they have to go.

Speaker 0 confesses to being paid to participate in a protest at the Capitol building. They mention getting a bruise and struggling to carry out their assigned role. The speaker also reveals that someone instructed them to act wild during the protest. They express hope that pretending to protest isn't too philosophical and acknowledge the question of the day.

An individual claims they were offered $200 a day by an organization called No Kings to protest ICE in New York on June 14. The instructions allegedly involved causing chaotic disruptions in specific streets, with pallets of bricks available for protesters to use. The speaker believes this is unpatriotic and suggests the organization wants to wreak havoc. They speculate that wealthy individuals are funding these protests, possibly to remove Trump from power. The speaker asserts that while they need money, they will not participate, but others will be tempted to destroy the city for the payment. They believe the situation reveals corruption at the highest levels.

A journalist is documenting protesters loading items into a van and asks how far they traveled to protest. The journalist claims to be with an independent news agency. The journalist asks where the protesters are from and notes they are wearing masks. The journalist asks if the protesters are paid and how much George Soros or Reid Hoffman paid them to protest. The journalist asks how much the protesters are getting paid and if they are having fun. The journalist states their pay doesn't matter and they are there to document the rally. The journalist asks if the protesters are getting paid to protest. The journalist asks why they don't want them to get the license plate number. The journalist suggests if they were a legitimate grassroots movement, they wouldn't be worried about it, but someone is clearly funding them.

Speaker 0 admits to being paid to pretend to protest at the Capitol building. They mention having difficulty pulling off the act and getting a bruise on their leg. Although they don't reveal who paid them, they suggest it was part of an organized effort.

Speaker 0 confesses in a video that they were paid to pretend to protest at the Capitol building. They mention having difficulty pulling off the act and getting a bruise on their leg. Although they don't reveal who paid them, they mention it was part of an organized effort.

The speaker questions the organic nature of rallies for figures like AOC and Kamala Harris. They claim that 84% of devices tracked at these rallies also attended nine or more Kamala Harris rallies or Antifa, BLM, pro-Hamas, or pro-Palestinian events, with 31% attending over 20. The speaker suggests this indicates paid attendance due to the travel and time commitment involved. They believe the Democratic party is artificially inflating its popularity by paying people to attend rallies and protests, creating "rally professionals."

The speaker describes how on-the-spot protests unfold, arguing that protests that appear to erupt immediately after events, and often seem spontaneous, are in fact not organic or unplanned. According to the speaker, such demonstrations can be initiated without the traditional apparatus of organizers, music, bullhorns, or large gatherings that are typically associated with coordinated protests. Instead, the speaker notes that trucks are being loaded to depart after the protest, suggesting a premeditated or at least organized behind-the-scenes workflow that enables these protests to occur with apparent immediacy. The speaker then identifies the groups involved in the protest activity behind them. The groups named are the Party for Socialism and Liberation, the Democratic Socialists of America, and a few looser organizations described as Revolutionary Communists for America. The speaker asserts that these groups, together, are responsible for the protests and the organizing of the demonstrations. A central claim of the speaker is that none of the protests seen are organic contributions arising spontaneously from local populations. Instead, the protests are characterized as well organized, implying a level of planning and coordination beyond what the public perceives. The assertion extends to the source of this organization, suggesting that the readiness and capability to mobilize protests come from structured planning and networks rather than spontaneous public sentiment alone. Building on the claim of organization, the speaker posits that the effective mobilization of these protests is supported by funding. The funding is described as coming through various campaigns, with two described pathways: foreign influence campaigns and domestic political campaigns, specifically mentioning Democrat campaigns as potential sources of financial support. The speaker implies that such funding enables the rapid deployment and execution of protest activities. In summary, the speaker contends that the protests observed after events are not spontaneously generated but are the result of deliberate organization by specific political groups, with notable involvement from the Party for Socialism and Liberation, the Democratic Socialists of America, and Revolutionary Communists for America. The speaker emphasizes that these protests are well funded through campaigns, including foreign influence efforts or Democratic campaigns, which facilitates their ability to mobilize quickly and appear as if they are happening organically.

A man photographed on a motorcycle waving a Mexican flag amidst fires and police cars may not be from Mexico, according to GPS data from his phone. The individual has reportedly sent money to Venezuela. His phone's location data places him at Antifa, BLM, Pro-Palestine, and Pro-MOS protests, as well as three Kamala Harris rallies. He returns nightly to a $2,000,000 residence. The question is raised regarding the source of his funding.

He gets paid between 80 to a $110,000 to do this exact thing. He identifies as a they them, but unfortunately, we only saw one Nate. He was actually my handler at the Labor Day protest. Nate is a prominent member with the Democrat Socialist of America Atlanta chapter. Here he is meeting with a Cuban ambassador, enjoying a beer while laughing with the ambassador. Nate is the chapter's recording secretary and electoral committee co chair. I have a handler at a protest. Nate wouldn't tell us how much he gets paid, but we know he does. This position also comes with various benefits like health and paid days off.

The speaker questions someone about their involvement in questionable donations made through ActBlue. They mention talking to people in Maryland who denied making the donations listed on ActBlue's website. The speaker is asked to leave and threatened with arrest for trespassing at a location in Massachusetts.

Kamala Harris is allegedly paying people to attend rallies. The speaker claims to have proof of this through a Casting Network billboard. The billboard sought nonunion actors for a Democratic event, offering payment, a per diem for meals and transportation, and coverage of flight and other expenses. The submissions were due the day before the speaker discussed it. The speaker believes this shows that the Harris campaign's ground game is a facade, as they are willing to pay for people to attend rallies.

The speaker claims they were a paid protester at a liberal protest on April 5th. To get paid, they had to find a woman with blue hair and a nose ring, avoid wearing MAGA gear or the color red, and participate in the march. Bringing a sign earned an extra $10, but it also had to align with the liberal agenda. The speaker's sign read, "Everyone deserves a good education." After the march, protesters had to complete a questionnaire with "right and wrong answers" to get paid. One question asked why Republicans want women to stay home. The speaker says they answered that it gives men more control due to women's financial dependence. Another question asked about critical race theory and why it should be taught. The speaker asked the organizer for help and was told it's about understanding the lasting effects of segregation and discrimination, like the inability of Black families to accumulate generational wealth through homeownership. The speaker was paid $100 for protesting and $10 for the sign.

Speaker 0 confesses in a video that they were paid to pretend to protest at the Capitol building. They mention having difficulty pulling off the act and getting a bruise on their leg. Although they don't reveal who paid them, they mention it was part of an organized effort.

The discussion includes observations of graffiti with anti-police and anti-ICE messages. One person recounts being approached to participate in a protest for pay, possibly by the group RDA, speculated to be a communist organization. Another topic involves collecting signatures for petitions. One person describes earning varying amounts per signature, up to $14 in Colorado, depending on the petition type (tax, veterinary, teachers' raises). They mention not needing to verify the signatures. The conversation shifts to accusations. One person claims war members are taking money from donors and accuses another of being a cheat and a liar, vowing to seek justice. The other person implies the accuser cannot afford something.

A journalist asks if there’s someone who can be spoken to about hearing, and is directed to the other side of the park. The exchange turns into a broader set of allegations about a man named Naftali Aaron Kranz and the organization Get Free. The speaker claims Naftali Kranz is a paid protester through Get Free. They present LinkedIn posts recruiting for paid protesters for the company, described as Get Free’s “part time mobilization support contractor.” The speaker asserts Get Free bills itself as a grassroots organization while Naftali and others are allegedly paid to protest. They claim Get Free aims to “undo white supremacy” and that one of the best ways to do that, in Naftali’s view, is to celebrate vandalism, citing Crown Heights, where someone threw an egg at a stranger’s cyber truck and placed dog feces on it. The speaker contends Naftali attended an abolish the police rally but was not the leader, instead blending in among other recruits, and that he works with the DSA, explaining why the speaker met him at a DSA Tax the Rich rally. On LinkedIn, the speaker says Naftali frequently posts about paid protester roles, urging people to join to “help us expand our effort to win reparations across the country,” with recruitment across Chicago, the Bay Area, and Baltimore. They describe a nine-week contract, part-time, paying $3,400 in stipends biweekly, seeking someone excited about experimentation who will recruit people and train them to drive turnout at events. The speaker also says Naftali is part of Jews Against Trump and urges donations to bail funds to “bail immigrants out of concentration camps,” adding a claim that a Jewish person who calls an immigration detention center a concentration camp has a serious mental illness, and criticizing colleges like NYU, the Democrat party, and mainstream media as brainwashing. The speaker asserts Nicole Cardi is at the top of the Get Free Movement and claims she says the George Floyd protests were the reason Biden won the 2020 election. They argue that protest NGO groups are about getting Democrats elected, and that donations to Get Free are funneled through ActBlue, which the speaker says is under investigation by the Department of Justice for foreign contributions. The speaker alleges ActBlue has funneled billions to activist groups like Indivisible Twin Cities, which is said to be orchestrating resistance to ICE agents in Minneapolis. Indivisible is claimed to have paid protesters and received over 7,600,000 dollars from the Open Society Foundation, funded by George Soros.

A nail technician in South Philly is allegedly being paid $700 a week by Kamala Harris' campaign to attend events. The speaker's nail tech, who is considered like family, shared this information. The nail technician is not a citizen and cannot vote, but is motivated by the extra money. According to the speaker, this explains why many people are seen holding signs at protests; they are paid $100 a day with travel expenses covered, despite not being eligible to vote.

A host confronts a guest whose company provides activists for hire. The host asserts the company pays actors to hold signs and protest, showing a video of a man who doesn't know why he's protesting. The guest claims they provide engaged activists and that compensating people is necessary to ensure sufficient turnout, similar to how the host is compensated for his show. The host objects to companies staging events and hiring people to make scenes appear larger than they are, arguing that activism should be organic. He believes such practices stir up conflict and distort the true scale of issues. He expresses his dislike for the guest's business.