TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The FDA, NIH, and CDC recommended vaccinating pregnant women at any time, leading to a rise in maternal mortality. A recent paper showed a concerning increase in maternal deaths in the US, erasing decades of progress in obstetrics. Pregnant women are dying with no mention of COVID or vaccines in the report. This alarming trend should be a cause for concern for everyone.

Data indicates a mechanism is impairing uteruses, causing placentas to flatten and lack blood vessels needed to nourish the baby. Maternal death rates are reportedly up 40%. All the information is available, and the speaker believes the time for action has passed.

I worked as a nurse in a pediatric ICU until I questioned reporting vaccine side effects. Despite 13 years of caring for sick children, I faced ridicule and lost my job due to vaccine misinformation. I never got COVID at work, wore PPE, and tested regularly. Thank you. Translation: I worked as a nurse in a pediatric ICU until I questioned reporting vaccine side effects. Despite 13 years of caring for sick children, I faced ridicule and lost my job due to vaccine misinformation. I never got COVID at work, wore PPE, and tested regularly. Thank you.

In a hospital setting, we have witnessed the devastating impact of the virus on infants, pregnant women, and young individuals. Some babies have tragically died at birth due to their mother's infection. Unvaccinated pregnant women face a twenty-fold increased risk of premature birth and a three to five-fold increased risk of fetal death in the womb. These statistics highlight the urgent need for pregnant women to get vaccinated.

I am Kimberly Biss, an OBGYN in Saint Pete, Florida. Since the vaccine rollout, we have seen a 50% decrease in new OB cases (infertility), a 50% increase in miscarriages, and a 25% rise in abnormal Pap Smears and cervical malignancies in our area.

Speaker 0 asked how many of his patients or pregnant women he knows experienced miscarriages after receiving COVID-19 vaccines. Speaker 1 responded with observational data from his practice. He said that in fall of the previous year, about 60% of pregnant patients in his practice were vaccinated, which he noted is commensurate with Florida’s overall vaccination rate of about 60–65–70%. Most of his pregnant patients received three injections, with very few receiving four or more, and the majority received their injections in 2021 and early 2022. He referenced a Substack by Jessica Rose from November 2022 that presents his data pictorially, and noted that his data runs from January 2020 to November 2022. In 2020, he observed many newly registered obstetric patients (represented by blue bars for first-trimester new pregnancies). He stated there were the most deliveries, suggesting a lockdown-related effect. He then discussed miscarriage rates. He noted that standard textbooks and articles quote a normal miscarriage rate of 13–15%, but he has never seen that clinically. A 2020 study by Nairt et al. reported the actual first-trimester miscarriage rate as 5–6%, and he considers that even that to be somewhat high. He reported his own average miscarriage rate in 2020 as 4% month-to-month. He stated that his miscarriage rate from year to year increased: in 2021, the average month-to-month rate was 7–8%, with a peak in November that year, when a non-clinical staff member told him there had been eight miscarriages in a single month in a practice that delivers 20–25 patients, a “huge number.” In 2022, the average month-to-month rate rose to 15% (up to November). In December 2022, there were 41 newly registered patients, and 13 of them lost their babies, which is 25% for that month. In January and February 2023, the rate remained high, and only normalized around June, with a subsequent slight rise and fall by September. Regarding whether the miscarriages were associated with vaccination, he said it is hard to determine: he could tell that about 60% of his patients were vaccinated, but many new patients had not yet appeared in his practice, since he is the sole clinician who asks every patient about vaccination, brand, and timing, as well as prior COVID infection. He noted that asking a patient who miscarries if they received an injection could come across as accusatory, so obtaining complete data is challenging. He concluded with the observation that the information is difficult to ascertain precisely and that not wanting a patient to feel blamed complicates collecting definitive links between vaccination and miscarriage.

I have 43 years of experience in high-risk obstetrics, seeing a large number of patients yearly. Stillbirth rates have decreased from 10 to nearly 6 in my career. In 2021, stillbirth rates for fetuses are alarming, with a rate of 29.3, indicating a significant deviation. Instances of stillbirths and fetal abnormalities are on the rise, possibly linked to the inflammatory effects of vaccines. Safety monitoring systems have not identified increased risks for pregnant individuals receiving vaccines. Inflammation in pregnancy can lead to harm, as known for decades.

I have 43 years of experience in high-risk obstetrics, seeing a large number of patients yearly. Stillbirth rates have decreased from 10 to 5.8-6 per 1,000 live births. In 2021, the stillbirth rate for fetuses is alarming at 29.3 per 1,000. Reports from Waterloo, Canada show 83 stillbirths out of 4,000 deliveries, with 13 dead fetuses in a 24-hour period. Vaccines are linked to inflammatory effects causing fetal harm. Safety monitoring systems found no significant risks for pregnant women. Inflammation in pregnancy can lead to damage, injury, and death, a known fact for decades.

I've always questioned everything, starting in my teenage years. I learned that the tetanus vaccine was said to prevent death from tetanus bacteria entering through wounds, but I discovered no one has actually died that way. During my training in Detroit, I noticed a disparity in who received the vaccine: those on welfare often did not, while private pay patients did. I found a significant difference in fertility rates between the two groups. Research revealed that since 1972, the WHO and NIH have been developing the tetanus vaccine with a pregnancy hormone, potentially causing early pregnancy loss. This has reportedly been used in various countries, and I suspect similar practices may occur in the U.S. These organizations are now behind the COVID vaccine.

Recently, there have been cases where the media has ignored the concerns of the police and victims. The speaker expresses a deep sense of crisis and condolences for those affected by COVID-19 and vaccines. They believe that the current situation is a serious crisis and a threat to democracy. They criticize the media for not listening and emphasize the importance of preserving the right to know. The speaker discusses the establishment of a medical society and the need for proper investigation and reporting of vaccine-related issues. They highlight the serious health risks and the lack of transparency in the government's response. The speaker urges healthcare professionals and the public to address these issues and gather information to understand the reality of vaccine side effects. They emphasize the need for scientific research and the responsibility of journalists to report the facts.

Despite it being treated as an obligation to do so, physicians reportedly do not know these facts. The speaker expresses strong frustration about the situation. The speaker cites a famous medical journal, the New England Journal of Medicine, describing a study of vaccine researchers and stating that “the 12.6 percent user rate” was reported, and that the paper claimed there was no problem with the vaccine based on that figure. Using that paper as a basis, the San Fujikawa Society or a similarly named organization promoted vaccination for pregnant women. However, the actual content of the data is described as follows: of 827 people, 700 were in the late stage of pregnancy, and 127 were in the early stage (first trimester). For the subgroup limited to those under 20 weeks’ gestation, i.e., the 127 individuals, the reported miscarriage rate was 82 percent. From this, the speaker argues that the vaccine is dangerous, given the result for the early-stage group. It is claimed that the data were hidden or obscured, and that the later report combined the late-pregnancy group of 700 with the early-pregnancy group of 127 to produce a 12.6 percent miscarriage rate, which was then published. The speaker concludes that even a major medical journal could be influenced by external financial pressures, resulting in biased reporting that supports the other side’s interests.

In a review of data from 2020 to February 2023, one speaker reports that their miscarriage rate increased by 100% from year to year. The speaker states that in 2020, the miscarriage rate in their practice was about 4% on average, then rose to 7-8% in 2021, and 15% in 2022. In February 2023, the miscarriage rate was 25% in their practice. The speaker notes a decline in newly registered first-trimester patients, suggesting possible infertility. They believe that something is happening globally, and the only global event in 2021 was the introduction of injections. Approximately 65-70% of Floridians received at least two injections, according to CDC data. In February 2022, 65% of the speaker's pregnant patients had at least two injections. The speaker believes these injections should be considered category X and are dangerous for pregnant women, citing FOIA request information indicating harm and no benefit.

Speaker 0 explains that even the obstetrics and gynecology association has reportedly pushed to vaccinate pregnant women as a duty, but doctors are the ones who do not know the facts. They reference a highly regarded medical journal, the New England Journal of Medicine, which published a study claiming a 12.6 percent user rate for the vaccine’s research results. Based on that paper, the 三 富 士 川 学 会 then attempted to vaccinate pregnant women. In reality, among the 827 individuals involved, 700 were in the postpartum period, 127 were in the antepartum period, and initial data were from that group. Specifically, for the group limited to those under twenty weeks (twenty weeks or less), which is 127 people, the miscarriage rate was 82 percent. Therefore, the argument is that, going forward, one can see how dangerous the vaccine is from those numbers. The speaker contends that data were hidden and later mixed into the 700-person postpartum group, yielding a miscarriage rate of 12.6 percent. Because of this, the claim is that even a leading medical journal has been influenced by money to publish such conclusions. Overall, the points presented are: - The obstetrics field is described as advocating vaccination of pregnant women as a duty, while physicians allegedly lack awareness of the underlying facts. - The NEJM published a study deemed to show a 12.6 percent user rate, which the speaker implies is problematic. - The 三 富 士 川 学 会 vaccinated pregnant women, but the data show that among 127 women under twenty weeks, the miscarriage rate was 82 percent. - The speaker asserts that this information was hidden and later combined with data from the 700 postpartum cases to produce a 12.6 percent miscarriage rate. - The implication is that even a top medical journal can be swayed by financial influence, resulting in biased reporting.

Now that people are seeing the trial documents, we're finding out about bad outcomes, like the eighty percent miscarriage rate in the Pfizer trials. They were aware of this. I'm Dr. Kimberly Biss, an OBGYN. After the COVID vaccines rolled out in 2021, I saw disturbing trends in my patients. My miscarriage rate had doubled from the previous year. I tracked my data in real time and published my findings on Dr. Jessica Rose's Substack in 2022. A lot of medical schools get a large portion of their funding from big pharma. I'm Yaniv Kelek, and this is American Thought Leaders.

I've always questioned things, starting in my teens when I wondered about the necessity of the tetanus vaccine every ten years. After discussions with medical professionals, I discovered that the narrative surrounding tetanus deaths was exaggerated. During my training in Detroit, I noticed a disparity in vaccine administration based on socio-economic status, with welfare recipients receiving fewer vaccines. I found alarming information suggesting that since 1972, the World Health Organization and NIH have been developing the tetanus vaccine with components that could lead to infertility in women. This vaccine allegedly contains a pregnancy hormone that can cause the body to attack early pregnancies, particularly in certain regions. I suspect similar practices may be occurring with the COVID vaccine, despite official denials.

In the Waterloo area, there have been 86 stillbirths from January to July, which is higher than the usual rate of 1 stillbirth every 2 months. The mothers of these stillborn babies were fully vaccinated, despite previous claims that vaccines are safe. The speaker questions the minister about what should be said to the doctors who advised pregnant women to get vaccinated and what should be told to the mothers who experienced stillbirths.

I have decades of experience in high-risk obstetrics and have seen a rise in stillbirth rates, with some cases showing alarming numbers of fetal deaths and complications. The vaccine has been linked to inflammatory effects that can harm pregnancies. Despite safety monitoring systems finding no significant risks, inflammation in pregnancy can lead to serious consequences.

Recent reports from fertility clinics indicate alarming issues with the reproductive health of vaccinated individuals. Men’s sperm is reportedly not swimming, and women’s eggs are not developing into embryos, with many contaminated by non-organic substances. A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine revealed an 80% miscarriage rate among vaccinated women in early pregnancy, significantly higher than the baseline rate. Additionally, there is a noted 79% increase in fetal malformations and unprecedented stillbirths. A database of over 6,000 women highlighted severe menstrual irregularities, including cases of extreme bleeding and decidual cast shedding. Concerns grow that many young women may face infertility due to vaccination, leading to unimaginable consequences.

It's December 23 and we've become desensitized to sudden deaths. A young mother died and nobody questions why. We hear about these things every day. There are concerns about adverse effects from flights to Australia, including blood clots and organ failure. Some believe that certain diseases and conditions are linked to vaccines. The changing climate poses risks to our health, even in the doctor's office. Many people have experienced cancer, seizures, and strokes in their families. It's time to wake up and realize that this is not a joke. There are concerns about the safety of certain medications, like Pfizer's. They may even be harmful to pregnancies.

The speaker experienced adverse reactions to the vaccine, including temporary loss of hand function. They were not informed of potential risks beforehand. Concerned about the impact on their children's fertility, they spoke out despite facing backlash. The speaker believes excessive media consumption contributes to illness and struggles with expressing their views to family. Despite potential criticism, they continue to share their concerns about the vaccine's effects on future generations. Translation: The speaker had negative vaccine side effects, was unaware of risks, and worries about the vaccine's impact on their children's fertility. They speak out despite backlash and believe media consumption affects health.

In January 2022, a colleague alerted Speaker 0 that there had been a doubling or tripling of baby deaths in the last year, which sparked curiosity. Speaker 1 states that “Their own government told us a medical treatment was safe, and it killed babies.” Speaker 2 says she has “lost all faith that Health Canada is looking out genuinely for the best interests of Canadians.” Speaker 3 alleges that doctors “made extra money to push vaccines” and were given a billing code to do it, and that she has “pulled all the billing codes.” Speaker 4 asserts that “They've purchased the vaccine that hasn't been approved,” distributed it to the provinces so that once it’s approved, they can “start jabbing ourselves with it” and “start jabbing pregnant mothers with it.” Speaker 3 questions the necessity of vaccinations: “Why did we have to get these vaccinations? Like, why was this something that we had to do? You go to the hospital, you expect to have a baby, and you expect to go home, and then you don't.” Speaker 0 speculates on criminal negligence, saying, “I would suspect that there was criminal negligence on part of the government and the public health officials.” Speaker 3 notes that it is “highly recommended that pregnant women get their vaccine as soon as possible.” Speaker 0 contends that a narrative was pushed to everybody, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, that the mRNA shots were safe and effective. Speaker 2 claims wiretapping, harassment, charging, and barring expert witnesses: “They had wiretapped her phone. They had harassed her. They had charged her. They didn't allow any expert witnesses to testify.” Speaker 1 accuses police of trying to cover up Canadian babies’ deaths “to the point of stopping detective Helen Greaves from testifying about it.” Speaker 4 observes that “The dominant individuals keep the subordinates in their place by constant aggression.” Speaker 5 discusses vaccination choice versus public risk, remarking, “If you don't wanna get vaccinated, that's your choice. But don't think you can get on a plane or a train besides vaccinated people and put them at risk,” and claims CBC initially “started off with CBC running a story to implicate her and to paint her with a brush that looks uncomplimentary to the public.” Speaker 6 claims Canada must shift its understanding of what the is, describing it as “a state broadcaster pushing the agenda of the Liberal government of Canada.” Speaker 4 calls this “the most significant matter affecting our children today from a health perspective,” noting that authorities are “not investigating.” Speaker 2 concludes that everything emanates outward from this case involving law enforcement, the judicial system, the pharmaceutical industry, and health agencies, “how they work together, how they censored information. It all ties together to this one case, and that's what makes it so dangerous.”

Most people have taken the vaccine, which can feel like a horror movie scenario. If you got the vaccine, you might worry about potential risks, especially if you were previously in favor of it. The push to vaccinate all ages, including pregnant women, has raised concerns due to studies showing a high rate of miscarriages. This research could lead to feelings of shame and guilt among those who received the vaccine.

The speaker says that even for obstetrics and gynecology societies, vaccination during pregnancy has been pursued as a duty, but physicians do not know the actual facts. They reference the New England Journal of Medicine, a famous medical journal, where a study of a vaccine’s adverse outcomes claimed that the user rate was 12.6%. Based on that paper, the Sanpeshikawa (Sanbushikawa) Association reportedly promoted vaccination for pregnant women as well. In reality, the data were as follows: of 827 people, 700 were in late pregnancy, and 127 were in the early stages (first trimester). When restricting to the 127 people who were under 20 weeks, the usage rate was 82%. Therefore, the speaker argues that this data reveals how dangerous the vaccine is, and that the data were hidden and mixed with high-profile 700-person data to produce the 12.6% miscarriage rate that was published. This is presented as evidence of a situation where even in medical journals, information was handled to favor the other side due to money and other influences.

Speaker 0 raises a concern that something can undermine Africa’s sovereignty and states that trust in WHO cannot be maintained. He proceeds to mention a specific issue among several that he says illustrate this risk. In twenty fourteen and twenty fifteen, WHO conducted a tetanus eradication campaign in their country, described as an effort to eradicate neonatal tetanus, which affects babies who are born and eventually get tetanus. The vaccine used in that campaign is described as a different type of tetanus vaccine, characterized by the speaker as a fertility-regulating vaccine. This vaccine is said to take tetanus and combine it with a hormone called human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), which supports pregnancy. The speaker claims that when a woman is injected with this vaccine, she produces antibodies against the hCG hormone and is therefore rendered sterile. Following this, the speaker reports noticing an increase in infertility among young couples. He describes cases where couples appear normal but cannot have children, and other couples who are losing three, four, or five pregnancies before they can carry any pregnancy to term. He asserts that these patterns have been exposed and that a paper detailing the findings has been published and is available. The overall claim ties the tetanus eradication campaign and the described fertility-regulating vaccine to broader consequences, including increased infertility and pregnancy losses, as part of the speaker’s argument about the impact of external health interventions on the country’s population. The speaker also notes that the publication of their paper provides documented material related to these observations. By presenting these points, he emphasizes a linkage between the 2014–2015 campaign, the vaccine’s purported mechanism involving antibodies to hCG, and the observed reproductive outcomes, asserting that these issues have been identified, exposed, and published for public access. The narrative frames the tetanus campaign and the vaccine as a cause of infertility trends, and it positions the cited publication as evidence accessible to readers.

On COVID, there's a perception that credit isn't given where it's due. While the vaccines were developed quickly, they don't prevent infection or transmission and may have serious side effects. In hindsight, would anything be done differently? Studies on the vaccines are ongoing, and results will emerge over time. It's important to note that Pfizer marketed its vaccine as safe for pregnant women, but reports indicated that over half of the 458 pregnant women who received the vaccine experienced adverse events. The ongoing studies will help clarify these concerns.