TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Efforts to prevent noncitizens from voting are gaining attention, despite it being rare. Only American citizens should vote, and in Georgia, a 100% citizenship verification process revealed that about 1,600 attempted registrations could not verify citizenship and were excluded from voter rolls. A recent court case, initiated by a coalition including Stacey Abrams' New Georgia Project, upheld the right to conduct citizenship verification before adding individuals to the voter rolls. This ruling sets a precedent for other states. All officials emphasize their commitment to ensuring only U.S. citizens vote, adhering to federal laws and state regulations. It's crucial for states to enshrine this in their constitutions, as Georgia has done.

A Georgia judge ruled that election officials must certify results even amid suspected voter fraud. Meanwhile, Democrats are suing to block drop box surveillance, hand counting, and voter ID protections, raising concerns about election security. In Virginia, Governor Youngkin removed over 6,000 noncitizens from voter rolls, prompting a lawsuit from the Biden administration. This action, based on a law from 2006 signed by then-Democrat Governor Tim Kaine, is viewed as common sense and constitutional. The timing of the lawsuit, just 25 days before the presidential election, is seen as troubling, as efforts to ensure free and fair elections are being challenged.

Only citizens should vote in federal elections according to most speakers. Some believe proof of citizenship should be required for voter registration, while others find it redundant and discriminatory. Voter ID laws are supported by some for ensuring election integrity without disenfranchising legal voters, citing increased turnout in states with such laws.

We moved to America six months ago and have already obtained our citizenship. We are excited to vote for Kamala Harris. Yesterday, we participated in voting in Gwinnett County, and today, we are voting in Fulton County. We have all our necessary documents ready.

A Biden executive order mandates all federal agencies to provide voter registration information to everyone they contact. State election officials cannot require proof of citizenship for those using the federal form. Consequently, non-citizens, such as asylum seekers or foreign students, may receive voter registration forms from government officials and mistakenly believe they must complete them. This leads to unlawful voter registration, and voting by a non-citizen is a deportable criminal offense.

The Supreme Court has allowed Virginia to purge suspected non-citizen voter registrations, a significant decision ahead of next week's election. This ruling permits the state to continue its program, despite previous court decisions siding with the Biden administration, which argued against removing large groups from voter rolls within 90 days of an election. However, individual investigations and removals are still permissible. Former President Trump and other Republicans support this move, labeling it as common sense. Virginia's Governor Youngkin, who is implementing the program, called it a victory for common sense and election fairness.

A judge ordered Virginia to reinstate over 1,500 individuals to the voting rolls, despite them declaring they are not U.S. citizens and providing immigration documents as proof. This situation is seen as outrageous, as it undermines the integrity of elections. The governor, Youngkin, is seeking an injunction against the judge's decision and is prepared to take the matter to the Supreme Court if necessary. The focus is on ensuring free and fair elections, adhering to the Constitution, which states that only citizens are eligible to vote. It's crucial for everyone to participate in the electoral process and make their voices heard by voting.

A Georgia judge ruled that election officials must certify results even amid suspected voter fraud. Democrats are suing to block measures like drop box surveillance, hand counting ballots, and voter ID protections, raising concerns about election security. In Virginia, Governor Youngkin removed over 6,000 noncitizens from voter rolls, a move criticized by the Biden administration, which is now suing Virginia for this action. The law allowing the removal of noncitizens has been in place since 2006, originally signed by then-Governor Tim Kaine. The push for secure elections is framed as a common-sense constitutional measure, contrasting with perceived efforts by Democrats to weaken election integrity.

I felt compelled to share my experience after working at a polling station for the November 5th election in Iowa. During training, I learned that illegal immigrants can vote using driver's licenses that look identical to those of US citizens. If their citizenship is questioned, they can still vote using a provisional ballot, which is later verified. They have until November 12th to provide proof of citizenship, but documents like utility bills do not confirm citizenship. I'm concerned about the integrity of the voting process and who verifies these provisional ballots. It's crucial for US citizens to be informed and vote responsibly. I encourage everyone to educate themselves and engage in the electoral process. This is about raising awareness of what’s happening. Please keep negative comments to a minimum; I'm sharing this to inform, not to offend.

I'm Rosemary Jenks from the Immigration Accountability Project. We estimate 30 million non-citizens in the US who can't vote. The Biden administration's order tells federal agencies to offer voter registration to everyone. State officials can't ask for citizenship proof on federal forms. Non-citizens like asylum seekers or foreign students may mistakenly register to vote, risking deportation for voting unlawfully.

Concerns have arisen about noncitizens voting in Arizona's elections, particularly regarding 218,000 voters who were improperly recorded as having provided proof of citizenship. This issue stems from long-time residents who obtained driver's licenses before citizenship requirements were enforced. The Arizona Supreme Court has ruled that these individuals are eligible to vote. Addressing the belief that noncitizens are voting in large numbers will be challenging, and it's likely this narrative will continue to surface after the election, regardless of the outcome.

We are committed to ensuring that only U.S. citizens participate in elections, and so far, there is no evidence of noncitizen voting. However, there have been instances where noncitizens voted; this year, 135 were identified as having voted, with another 400 registered but not yet voting. Just because something is illegal doesn't mean we shouldn't have measures in place to prevent it, similar to how we maintain TSA for air travel security.

Good evening. A federal court in Iowa has ruled in favor of Republicans, allowing the state to challenge the validity of 2,176 ballots that may belong to non-citizens ahead of the election.

Speaker 0 explains that under that scenario, someone could get their driver's license again because they register to vote. If the Social Security number doesn’t match, they’re flagged, but as long as they have an ID (the driver’s license) and sign that they’re eligible to vote, they can vote, and they’re no longer flagged. They would be on the system, correct, Mister Lanell. Speaker 1 responds: Madam chair, if I could add, and maybe stepping back from those that are flagged as CID on the roster, for anyone presenting documentation to register to vote, that is an affirmation of their identity. The driver’s license has not been used as proof of citizenship for the purposes of registering to vote—affirming that they are who they say they are. So in any of these cases where someone were to cast a ballot if they were ineligible to vote, there are also reports that are generated post election for voters that are challenged. Counties will run to show status of voters that had been updated due to the fact that they’ve now cast a ballot, and that can be reviewed and referred to the county attorney. Speaker 0 concludes: Okay. So the answer is yes to my question.

It is against the law for noncitizens to vote in federal elections. However, some states are not requiring proof of citizenship when noncitizens register to vote. Governor Glenn Youngkin in Virginia issued an executive order to clean up voting rules. The Biden administration's Department of Justice sued the governor and the Commonwealth of Virginia to try to prevent them from cleaning up their voter rolls. This creates doubt and concern because everyone should want the law to be followed.

I, of course, want to remove every non eligible voter from our voter rolls. That is not in dispute. I, of course, want to remove every non eligible voter from the voter rolls, especially those who don't support my core values. That is not in dispute.

Anna, a noncitizen who has lived in the US for 25 years, encourages other noncitizens in DC to register to vote. She learned that she is eligible to vote in DC and was excited by the prospect. Another speaker highlights that DC has a large immigrant population that lacks deserved representation. Noncitizens in DC who have resided there for at least 30 days and do not intend to vote elsewhere are encouraged to register and make their voices heard. Information on registration can be found on the board of elections website.

Speaker 0 states they can help the individual register when they get their ID. Speaker 1 asserts that an ID does not prove citizenship. Speaker 0 says they moved the individual from citizens in 2013 and that they had IDs in multiple states. The individual acknowledges this.

It is against the law for noncitizens to vote in federal elections. However, some states do not require proof of citizenship when noncitizens register to vote. Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin issued an executive order to clean up the state's voting rules. The Biden-Harris administration Department of Justice sued the governor and the Commonwealth of Virginia to prevent them from cleaning up their voter rolls. This creates doubt and concern in the minds of many Americans.

A crowd gathered at the Saint Paul Armory after the governor signed a measure making driver's licenses available broadly, described as “driver’s licenses for all,” effectively serving as a photo ID for all residents, regardless of citizenship. The discussion then centers on how these licenses interact with voting and registration processes. One speaker notes that if someone comes in with a driver’s license, they would receive a photo ID and register accordingly, even if their social security number is incorrect or missing. The concern raised is whether that person, after obtaining a driver’s license, could then cast a vote despite incomplete registration information. The dialogue explores the potential for a non-citizen who possesses a driver’s license to participate in elections. In response, another participant—referred to as the chair—addresses the procedure for handling incomplete registrations. The chair explains that the designation on the roster for someone whose registration is incomplete can be resolved if the person presents an acceptable identification document. In such a case, the challenge from the roster would be cleared, and the individual would be permitted to cast a ballot. A subsequent aside acknowledges the potential problem inherent in this approach, with a speaker named Anderson prompting clarification. The core question remains: could a person who is not a citizen, but who presents a driver’s license at the voting point, be permitted to vote? The chair provides a definitive statement regarding eligibility: at both the time of registration and at the time of submitting a ballot, every voter signs an attestation affirming their eligibility to vote, including that they meet all eligibility requirements that they are a US citizen. This underscores the requirement that, despite the availability of driver’s licenses to a broad population, the attestation of citizenship remains a binding condition for voting. The exchange highlights a tension between broad ID access and the constitutional requirement of citizenship for voting, with the chair reiterating that citizenship is required to vote, even if driver’s licenses are issued more inclusively.

A bill signed in 2006 requires using DMV data to remove non-citizens from voter rolls if they are registered. This process has been ongoing for 18 years, even under Democrat governors. When someone identifies as a non-citizen at the DMV and is registered to vote, registrars are notified and the individual is given 14 days to affirm citizenship or be removed from the voter roll. The Department of Justice ordered the process to stop 25 days before a presidential election. The governor believes this is unprecedented and indicates the DOJ is trying to achieve something other than fair elections. The governor's job is to ensure fair, accurate, and safe elections in Virginia, and he will continue to do so because he believes the Department of Justice is wrong.

We work for a company registering Hispanic voters. Visited a Georgia complex, found 14% noncitizens registered to vote. Georgia has 339,000 noncitizens, potentially 47,000 registered. Biden won by 12,000 votes. 2024 election at risk.

Speaker 0: President Trump is urging Congress to pass the Save America Act, describing it as one of the most critical pieces of legislation in our nation's history. He asserts the Save America Act is overwhelmingly popular with all Americans because each provision is rooted in common sense, and outlines five simple requirements as requested by the president of the United States. 1) Voters have to show ID to cast a ballot in an American election. He states this is very simple and notes that 90% of Americans, including more than 80% of Democrat voters, agree with this. 2) The Save America Act will require all voters to show proof of citizenship in order to register to vote. He asserts this is popular and rooted in common sense, insisting that only American citizens have the right to vote in American elections. He claims that after Joe Biden and the Democrats allowed tens of millions of illegal aliens into the country, it is more important than ever to ensure that only American citizens are registering to vote on our nation's voter rolls, and he calls on Congress to pass this. 3) The Save America Act abolishes the incongruously unsecure practice of universal mail-in ballots, which he says "throw the door wide open for fraud." He notes that the act maintains exceptions for Americans to use mail-in ballots for illness, disability, military, or travel reasons. He references the bipartisan 2005 report of the Commission on Federal Election Reform, chaired by former president Jimmy Carter and former secretary of state James Baker, which concluded that absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud and that Congress should address this. 4) The Save America Act permanently bans men from competing in women's sports. He notes that President Trump signed a landmark executive order upholding the promise of Title IX and ending this practice, and argues that now it’s time for Congress to codify this into law. 5) The Save America Act bans transgender mutilation surgery for children. He states that the president signed a common-sense executive order to do this and kept his promise to the American people, but now Congress needs to codify it. He asserts it is well past time for Democrats in Congress to stop perpetuating the radical and false claim that you can somehow change a child's sex, stating that you cannot. He concludes by saying passing the Save America Act is the most important thing Republicans—and frankly Democrats—can do to strengthen election integrity and protect democracy. He asserts it is what the American people elected Republicans to do and that they must deliver on it as soon as possible. The president calls on Congress to get the job done and send this historic piece of legislation to his desk immediately for signature.

The US code may allow illegal aliens to vote in the upcoming presidential election. According to Title 18, if an alien reasonably believed they were a US citizen at the time of voting, they are not subject to prosecution. Many people crossing the border are excited to vote for Joe Biden and claim to be citizens. If foreigners vote in the election, there is nothing that can be done about it after the fact. The American people are the reason for hope.

The first speaker describes a scenario in which a person can obtain a driver’s license again because licenses are issued broadly to those who register to vote. If the individual’s Social Security number does not match, they are flagged, but as long as they present an ID (the driver’s license) and sign that they are eligible to vote, they can vote and are no longer flagged, remaining in the system. Mister Lanell then responds by clarifying the process. He says that for anyone presenting documentation to register to vote, that documentation serves as affirmation of their identity. He notes that the driver’s license has not been used as proof of citizenship for the purposes of registering to vote; rather, it affirms that the person is who they say they are. He adds that in any case where someone were to cast a ballot, if they were ineligible to vote, there are reports generated post-election for voters who are challenged. Counties run these reports to show the status of voters that had been updated due to having cast a ballot, and these reports can be reviewed and referred to the county attorney. The first speaker concludes by restating the original question and provides a direct answer: the answer is yes to their question.