TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I claim to be the chosen one, stating that China has made $500 billion by ripping off the United States through intellectual property theft and other means. I believe someone had to take action, so I am taking on China in trade. And the good news is, we are winning.

The president's strategy drove recent events. He and the speaker discussed it at length on Sunday. The president may have goaded China into a bad position, leading them to be perceived as bad actors. The U.S. is willing to cooperate with allies and trading partners who did not retaliate. The message was simple: don't retaliate, and things will turn out well.

China's extensive espionage activities in the US are rarely acknowledged. As president, I established a program to target Chinese espionage, but Joe Biden terminated it, claiming it was racist. This decision followed a request from faculty members at the University of Pennsylvania, where the Biden Center is located. Congress should investigate the university's financial operations, Chinese donors, and the Biden family. When I return to the White House, I will take even more significant action to curtail China's espionage. We will collaborate with businesses and universities to protect against insider threats, impose visa sanctions and travel restrictions, and dismantle China's secret police force operating in the US. We will put an end to their influence. Thank you.

During my campaign, I supported Taiwanese independence. I hate China, and I hate Xi Jinping. I've denounced China and would die for America. I'm making it clear that these people will never be near me again. I have nothing to do with them! Do you want me to shout from the rooftops that the CCP is bad? Because I think Xi Jinping is a piece of shit, and he should go to hell. I believe that the most important relationship is that between China and the United States. We need leaders to see that China is now a peer. We are better off as partners. We can do business and trade, and have student exchanges. Every four years we hear the same China bashing, but after the election the tone changes. They do this because it riles up the voters. But that kind of rhetoric is harmful.

Russia isn't the only significant adversary; China is equally capable. If Russia is supporting Republicans, why not ask China for support as well? I'm calling on China to assist us. Additionally, if China is listening, they should obtain Trump's tax returns, as our media would likely reward them for it.

Ken Langone expressed concern about potential retaliation if Trump wins, highlighting the need to address critical issues. Trump dismisses Langone's support, emphasizing success over revenge. He defends his border policies, boasting about the wall and pressuring Mexico with tariffs. Trump criticizes China for building plants in Mexico and threatens tariffs on their cars. Ultimately, Trump believes in common-sense solutions for the country's problems. Translation: Ken Langone expressed worry about retaliation if Trump wins, emphasizing the importance of addressing key issues. Trump dismisses Langone's support, focusing on achieving success rather than seeking revenge. He defends his border policies, boasting about the wall and pressuring Mexico with tariffs. Trump criticizes China for building plants in Mexico and threatens tariffs on their cars. Ultimately, Trump believes in common-sense solutions for the country's problems.

I have never received any money from any foreign source in my entire life. It has come to our attention that the current president has paid significantly more taxes in China, possesses a hidden bank account in China, conducts business in China, and has made claims about me accepting money. However, I want to clarify that I have never accepted any money from any country at any time.

A 4% tariff on China is insufficient; 400% is necessary because China doesn't adhere to WTO rules, steals IP, and cannot be litigated against in their courts. This isn't just about tariffs; it's about leveling the playing field, something no one has done. The speaker claims to represent millions of Americans whose IP has been stolen. While acknowledging the Chinese people's contributions, the speaker asserts their government cheats and steals. The speaker praises the Trump administration for standing up to China. The speaker believes 400% tariffs would force China to negotiate, as Xi Jinping's leadership depends on employment. The speaker argues America, holding 39% of global consumables and 25% of the world's GDP, has the leverage to pressure China. The speaker advocates implementing 400% tariffs immediately, anticipating a swift resolution.

Trump is officially three in o with China. Here's what nobody's talking about. China had a heavy investment in Iran. Trump neutered them. China had a heavy investment in Gaza. Trump secured a regional firewall. China straightforwardly controlled Venezuela for two decades. Trump's moving in and China's blinking for a third time. And that's why everyone is asking the wrong questions when it comes to Venezuela. The cover story is this: Trump's military buildup toward Venezuela is about countering narcoterrorism and targeting drug cartels like Trend Agua, which are tied to the president Nicolas Maduro's regime. But analysts go a step further and they still miss the mark when they say, well, this is really about regime change. It's neither of these things. I mean, yes, we've got a drug problem, but it's actually ties to a much bigger issue. Trump's Venezuela offensive is much bigger. It's his proxy war against China, and he's the only president in history who was actually fighting China where it hurts. As of this week, Trump has positioned over 10,000 US troops and eight warships in the region. We have helicopters and Reaper drones taking out narco boats. We have F-35s, and Venezuela has scrambled their jets. And this week, Trump has authorized the CIA to carry out lethal operations in Venezuela. We'll dive into that one a little deeper in the next segment. All this to ostensibly go after drug boats and fight narco terrorism. Yet everyone is taking this at face value. Listen. Why not have the coast guard stop them, which it is empowered by law to do? So Trump answers question as asked. Because we've been doing that for thirty years, and it has been totally ineffective. Even the ostensibly right-leaning National Review gets it wrong by musing that this is all about regime change. Here's why this whole Venezuela offensive is really about China, and this is a shadow war against Beijing. The first in history that looks like it will actually work. You see, attacking Maduro is attacking Xi Jinping. To think that Maduro is some independent agent is naive and foolish. Why is Venezuela basically China? Well, follow the money, the oil money. Again, remember what I said yesterday about why China is likely the biggest force behind the Gaza war in promoting Palestine and Hamas protests around the globe? Remember, it's about taking advantage of bad leadership that sits over cheap oil and cheap resources. China sweeps in, buys out the leadership, gets free gas, essentially. Venezuela is the poster boy of this predatory China oil game. Beijing is Venezuela's largest creditor by far. Venezuela has over 60,000,000,000 in debt to Beijing since 02/2007. It pays Beijing back in, you guessed it, oil. Venezuela is economically paralyzed by sanctions. The only country supporting Venezuela meaningfully is Beijing because they're the primary buyers. This forces Venezuela to sell their oil for next to nothing, meaning they'll forever be indebted to Beijing. That's the whole game. That's the way China plays. In May 2025, at the China CELAC Forum, Beijing gave Venezuela an additional billion dollars in new oil investments, solidifying Venezuela's position as the front lines of The US China shadow war. But China's interests in Venezuela go far beyond cheap oil and economics. Chinese companies are neck deep in modernizing Venezuela's ports and telecom infrastructures. And in all things related to Chinese companies, you're a fool to think the Chinese Communist Party does anything without making it a dual military civilian use project. I'll say it again. China does not allow its companies to operate in the world unless it could also be used for their national security purposes. So don't be fooled when Trump is using all this force and manpower and CIA expertise in Venezuela. This is Trump taking the war to China. He's doing what no other president before him was even remotely capable of accomplishing. Trump is declaring war on China's most valuable assets, Iran, Venezuela, Gaza. What do these tin pot dictatorships have in common? They'd be nothing without the Chinese Communist Party. And China would be nothing in the geopolitical stage without them. And now Trump is taking them, Iran, Gaza, and now Venezuela. Three strikes, and you're out, Xi.

Many wealthy individuals, including Jews, who have supported the Communist Party and Mao Zedong in China, are now realizing that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) poses a threat to them. The speaker warns Jews not to risk their future or lives for money. The speaker believes that Iran is behind the conflict in Palestine, and China and Russia are behind Iran. The CCP is accused of being on the side of Palestine and condemning Israel, accusing Jewish racism and instigating the conflict. The CCP's state-controlled media supports Palestine and encourages them to fight and kill more Jews. The speaker emphasizes the seriousness of the CCP's anti-Semitism and contempt for Jews.

The speaker asserts that China, India, and Brazil are prolonging the war by buying cheap Russian oil, which they characterize as "blood money." They claim these countries are acting at the expense of the world and that President Trump is tired of this situation. The speaker warns that if these countries continue, the US will "tear up the hell out of" them and crush their economies. They advise President Putin to negotiate soon, implying that he is about to be defeated.

Speaker 0 states that Donald Trump is in retreat due to opposition to his tariff policies, which are described as chaotic and damaging to the economy. These policies are said to discourage spending due to their unpredictability and harm American families. Speaker 1 claims tariffs send a message to China that their unfair trade policies must end and that failure to reform will have dramatic consequences. The speaker asserts China has a large and growing trade surplus with the U.S., partly due to free trade rules, but largely because China doesn't play fair by restricting access to their markets and not preventing the theft of intellectual property.

China is considered a formidable adversary like Russia, and the speaker suggests that they should also support their side. They openly ask China to back them, just as Russia is believed to support Republicans. Additionally, they encourage China to obtain President Trump's tax returns, implying that the media would greatly appreciate it.

The speaker emphasizes the rise of China as a positive development and dismisses the idea of slowing down Chinese growth. They criticize Donald Trump's approach, accusing him of hysteria and xenophobia towards China. The speaker also mentions Joe Biden's stance, suggesting that he believes China always wins. The transcript ends with a mention of a trade agreement and a disclaimer about the content of the advertising.

The speaker wants the FBI to investigate Donald Trump's financial, personal, and political connections to Russia. They want to see Trump's tax returns to understand the relationship between him and Putin, whom Trump admires.

The message suggests Chinese interest in partnering with the Bidens, referencing Xi Jinping as the number one. Joe Biden planned to run for president in 2020 in 2016. The committee should investigate the Bidens' business in China in 2017 while Joe Biden was eyeing the presidency. The speaker urges the committee to examine evidence from the SDNY and FISA warrants related to CFC.

China pays Biden directly, giving him $28 billion. The speaker criticizes Biden as the most corrupt and incompetent president ever. They claim to have been indicted for protesting a rigged election, while those responsible for the rigging are not held accountable. The speaker mentions their poll numbers rising and implies that they have been targeted by multiple indictments.

The speaker asserts that the Russians interfered in the 2016 election, suggesting that a full investigation would reveal Trump's illegitimacy as president. They claim that Trump lost the election and was only placed in office due to Russian interference. The speaker then asks if the listener believes Trump is an illegitimate president based on their statement, which they cannot retract.

The speaker claims that America was once rich due to tariffs, which taxed other countries for taking American jobs, similar to China's current policies. They state that in the 1880s, a commission was formed to decide what to do with the excess money generated from tariffs. The speaker asserts that America switched to an income tax system in the early 1900s because other countries pressured America to stop using tariffs, implying these countries controlled American politicians. They contrast this with China's policy of requiring companies to build factories there to sell cars, referencing Elon Musk as an example and praising him.

To all Lao Baijing in China, there are many patriots in the United States who support you in taking down the Xi Communist Party, which is the most evil dictatorship since Adolf Hitler. We are inspired by Miles Guo and the New Federal State of China. We appreciate the support from the War Room and Steve Bannon in spreading awareness about our movement. Our fight is your fight. We must decouple from the Chinese Communist Party and destroy the oligarchs who profit from slave labor. President Trump's next term should focus on completely dismantling this brutal dictatorship. Take down the CCP.

A 4% tariff on China is insufficient; 400% is necessary because China doesn't abide by WTO rules, steals IP, and can't be litigated against in their courts. A 400% tariff would force China to negotiate and level the playing field. No administration has confronted China, but the Trump administration has. This speaker claims to represent millions of Americans whose IP has been stolen. While acknowledging the Chinese people's contributions, the speaker asserts their government cheats and steals. Xi Jinping's leadership depends on employment, and America, controlling 39% of consumables and 25% of global GDP, holds the leverage. The speaker advocates for immediate 400% tariffs, believing it will compel China to negotiate swiftly.

An individual in China displays a home allegedly containing no US products, then asks if the listener has Chinese products in their home. The speaker suggests Americans should be angry about China getting rich off of them, possibly for the speaker's entire life. The speaker questions anger directed at Trump and Elon Musk, especially in light of Trump's tariffs on China.

Speaker 0 states that 2017 will be the year of offense, and they will push the case against Russia, asserting it is time for Russia to pay a heavier price for its aggression. Speaker 1 expresses belief in the speaker's victory and pledges to provide whatever is needed to win.

The speaker states that China wants to make a deal with the United States and believes China has to make a deal. China made a mistake when it retaliated. When America is punched, the president punches back harder, which is why 4% tariffs will go into effect on China tonight at midnight. The president believes that Xi and China want to make a deal, but they just don't know how to get that started. If China reaches out to make a deal, the president will be incredibly gracious but will do what's best for the American people. The Chinese want to make a deal, but they just don't know how to do it.

The speaker believes President Trump has "won" because 40% of the world's countries are supposedly trying to reduce tariffs with America due to his actions. The speaker claims China wants a deal, not primarily for economic reasons, but to "save face." China's economy is allegedly in its worst shape in 25 years, making it unable to withstand further economic conflict. The speaker asserts China is quietly seeking a deal with President Trump, similar to 40% of countries worldwide. The speaker urges seizing the opportunity and pursuing a deal aggressively.