reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The discussion centers on a group of notable figures surrounding the death of Charlie Kirk, a story that the speakers describe as growing increasingly crowded with unusual characters. Skyler Baird is introduced as one of the voices commenting on the event, and the conversation emphasizes a highly charged, almost surreal sequence of moments surrounding the tragedy. Skyler Baird recounts being perhaps 10 or 15 feet away when the incident occurred and suggests that viewers should watch the video for about ten seconds to catch what happened. The dialogue highlights an attempt to balance the tone by noting a focus on the positive and asking how to ensure that Charlie Kirk is remembered. The remark characterizes Skyler’s reaction to witnessing what is described as a “publicly executed” moment on September 10 as “quite a completely natural reaction,” framing it as a baseline of normality in an otherwise extraordinary and troubling narrative. The discussion then pivots to Skyler’s first contribution in the aftermath of the event. Skyler describes how he was right there and “kinda escorted” the person involved to a police officer. He clarifies that there was a cop nearby as well, but emphasizes his role in escorting the individual. The person who is escorted is described as saying, “I shot him. I shot him.” This claim becomes a focal point of the recounting, signaling a pivotal, sensational moment in the sequence of events. Attention then shifts to the figure known as old man George, identified as George Zinn. The narrative recalls that he stood up immediately after Charlie was shot and shouted, “shoot me, shoot me.” The speakers remind the audience that George Zinn had previously been characterized as a bad man with very dark proclivities, a framing that is referenced to underscore the dramatic shifts in how characters are perceived as the story unfolds. Skyler’s involvement is linked to these evolving perceptions, as he is described as having helped apprehend the decoy. The passage concludes with an admission that the sequence may be a matter of coincidence, expressed as “Coincidence, I suppose.” The speakers remark that the Internet promptly responds, with “the Internet doing its thing” and beginning to discuss and analyze the developing storyline.

Dexter Reed shot at the police and faced consequences. The speaker believes criminals should be removed from the community by the police. They criticize those who defend individuals who shoot at law enforcement. The speaker blames the lack of father figures for societal issues and warns against rioting. They express hope for swift police action in Democratic cities like Chicago.

Where's the third assassin? Show yourself. Third time's the charm, right? Not me, FBI. It’s someone else. I believe in you.

They want us dead. That's what they want.

The speaker had a cut over their eyes from shooting from a prone position. Police found Byron Beckwith's fresh fingerprint on the rifle scope. Beckwith claimed a burglar had stolen his rifle just before the murder: "My rifle was stolen out of my house several days before this nigger turned up dead." Regarding the fingerprint, the speaker asks, "Don't you clean your gun? Don't you clean the lens of your camera? Don't be such a damn fool."

Everybody knows the dice are loaded and people rose with their fingers crossed. Everybody knows the war is over and the good guy's lost. Everybody knows the fight was fixed. The poor stay poor and the rage get rage. That's how we go. Everybody knows.

The speaker repeatedly centers a provocative and conspiratorial set of accusations anchored by the refrain that “Afro man” (also spelled “Aphroman” in places) will bring information or consequences, asserting that “my proof's on the Internet.” The narrative weaves together several interrelated claims about individuals allegedly engaged in illegal or unethical behavior and improper conduct, presenting them as part of a broader exposure case. Key claims include that William is a pedophile, with the speaker suggesting that telling folks the truth should not require going to trial and asserting that “Newland sexting kids” is true, followed by a claim that Newland is “stealing my money too.” The speaker emphasizes that the proof of these assertions is available online, repeatedly underscoring “my proof's on the Internet.” The refrain about Afro man or Aphroman appears as a delivery mechanism for the allegations, with repeated promises that Afro man will bring it to you and that Afro man is going to screw you, paired with the assertion that the proof is on the internet. Additional allegations focus on specific individuals in law enforcement and related circles. Tasha Chamberlain is identified as a confidential informant. Roy Gabbard is named as the judge who signs fictitious warrants. The speaker attributes fault to these parties collectively, stating that the entire situation is “totally their fault.” A separate line appeals for protection against rape and avoiding video capture, suggesting a threat or fear of exposure. The speaker continues by naming other figures and events: “Prosecutor David Kelly turned the jelly when they fell,” a line that is presented as a factual claim about a prosecutorial action. A version of the narrative notes that “Coward ran to Arizona so he wouldn't catch the hell,” and asserts that “Kimmy tried to dodge us” while “Rogers tried to retire and dip like a rat leaving a sinking ship,” portraying these individuals as fleeing accountability. Throughout, the refrain about Afro man persists, reinforcing the idea that Afro man will reveal or deliver the supposed proofs. A broader accusation targets “all you crooked cops in the world,” with a warning to stop wrongdoing or be addressed in a song. The speaker repeats that “my proof's on the Internet” as a core justification for the compelled attention, and closes with a provocative question about whether others will believe what they are hearing, underscoring the certainty that the recipients may doubt the claims, yet insisting that Afro man will deliver.

Nobody cares about the trials and tribulations of your weak lives.

"Candace ain't lying, guys. I know it for a fact." "We all know that these narratives they're spinning out that they're putting out don't make any sense. They don't make any sense at all." "We don't know who killed him, why it was done, or how it was done." "None of us really know." "If you're actually believing what these people are telling us, you're cooked." "No. No. No. Look closer. It's it's yellow. What are you talking about?" "How do we best honor Charlie's death and legacy than figuring out who the hell killed him and why and how?" "There is absolutely something going on in that organization." "There was something going on prior to his assassination." "There's absolutely something going on right now, and they do not want us to know." "We fight to figure out what the hell it is they don't want us to know."

Speaker 0: Hey, yo. Stop scrolling for one second for me. Give me just one second. Look, we were not there to figure out who killed Kennedy. We were not there to figure out who killed King, but we did figure out one thing. That this dude right here look. This guy right here running, you see him running? That is the guy that took out Kurt. That's the guy. That's him right there. Speaker 1: If speech is violence, then some are bound to conclude that violence is justified to stop speech. And we're not gonna let that be justified.

Where's the third assassin? Show yourself! Third time's the charm, babe. Not me, FBI. It has to be someone else. I believe in you!

Hey, yo. Stop scrolling for one second for me. Give me just one second. Look, we were not there to figure out who killed Kennedy. We were not there to figure out who killed King, but we did figure out one thing. That this dude right here look. This guy right here running, you see him running? That is the guy that took out Kurt. That's the guy. That's him right there. If speech is violence, then some are bound to conclude that violence is justified to stop speech, and we're not gonna let that be justified.

Mama loves you, but she's gone. Everyone is dead.

- The discussion opens with a hypothetical plan about obtaining and examining the Anthony Weiner laptop, suggesting it contains prosecutable material and noting that New York police officers who viewed parts of it reportedly “had to go throw up.” - Speaker 1 then shifts to a reveal about Anthony Bourdain, ABC’s Bob Woodruff, and a shift away from debunked conspiracies to focus on James Alifantis, a DC figure described as an art collector, fundraiser, and owner of venues including Comet Ping Pong. He is noted as being personally thanked by Hillary Clinton for “extraordinary talent” during a Podesta fundraiser and pictured with Tony Podesta; his past boyfriend is identified as David Brock of Media Matters. Alifantis is described as having influenced donors including Pete Buttigieg, according to the Federal Election Commission. The speaker raises questions about why Alifantis would be equated with pedophilia. - Speaker 2 begins a first-hand account from December 17, with JB recounting James Alifantis’s connection to St. Albans in DC and Greenwood. The retelling includes an accusation that Alifantis walked in seeking a job and, in a separate claim, that he sexually abused an 11-year-old boy in the kitchen, with the boy (Dylan Greenwood) later reportedly committing suicide about two years prior. The account alleges underground rooms at Comet Ping Pong and tunnels to other buildings, including one possibly owned by the Clinton Foundation, and asserts the tunnels extend in the area, potentially reaching multiple locations. The speaker says Alifantis was attempting to obtain a manager job. There is also a suggestion that Alifantis earned money by trafficking children and that tunnels connect to other sites near Comet Ping Pong, including a place “across the street.” The speaker ends by indicating willingness to post these claims as “primary source” information. - Speaker 1 then notes bands associated with Comet Ping Pong and references members such as Amanda Kleinman of Heavy Breathing, as well as the DC punk group Loud Boys and the song “The Sextanes,” with insinuations about pedophilia in some audience members. They describe Comet Ping Pong as a family restaurant with a backroom for children’s birthdays. - The discussion references a 2007 FBI bulletin noting a blue spiral-shaped triangle symbol used by predators, reportedly etched into coins and rings, and connects this to the venue’s events and music videos by The Sextanes. It is claimed that Alifantis’s Instagram showed Antinous, a Greek emperor associated with a modern cult of LGBT polytheists; Antinous is described as a prominent symbol in pederastic culture. The claim is also made that Alifantis has no children, yet posts many images of children on Instagram, some stated to be taken from friends’ and family members’ pages. - The transcript lists various images and hashtags associated with Alifantis, including references to Panda Head Morgan, Panda Head Magazine, and a video describing Cultpanda. Specific images allegedly include a goddaughter with taped arms, a baby in an art gallery, and a baby doll image, with censorship of certain ambiguous images. The speaker alleges connections to people like Scott Cummings (owner of Portland Natural Casket Company) and notes tattoos and death-related imagery. - There are additional posts and comments linked to Alifantis’s social media, including a post about a “Miss Summer Camp” with sexualized captions, and comments referencing “let’s hang a baby,” “I put my baby in a slow cooker,” and other disturbing captions. A commenter group includes “Pizza F***ing Party,” who posted images of children with condoms, coins, vials of alcohol, a pentagram, a “Baby Doll Pizza” logo from a Portland restaurant, and a claim that Portland, Oregon is linked to alleged trafficking. A witness, Michael Whelan, is cited as a Portland resident who claims to have seen illicit activity involving Voodoo Doughnuts. The speaker questions why such activities would occur in Portland, asking why children are being taken to the back, and remarks that survivors would recognize such behavior as flaunted and protected. - The dialogue ends with a reiteration of the Voodoo Doughnuts reference and the question of why there is alleged abuse of children, noting that perpetrators appear to act with impunity.

It don't look like there's been three or four guys in years. Shot everybody.

We visited the land of unconfirmed witnesses. Afterward, he died. I'm sure our visit had something to do with it.

Speaker questions the narrative: 'random trans shooter' on the roof who 'took this shot' and was 'undetected' because the FBI released video footage. He asks if this means 'he must have already had planted the gun on the roof prior' and wonders 'why didn't he have it on him when he was leaving?' He questions the lack of footage—'why don't we have any images of this kid leaving the school?' and 'video footage of this kid jumping off the roof?' He says, 'he runs roughly one mile with a long arm rifle in broad daylight to stash it in the woods' and argues, 'you definitely wouldn't carry the rifle with you' to blend in, citing 'an American flag shirt on.' He references 'criminal minds' and BAU, concluding, 'This is weird, guys. This is freaking weird.'

Innocent people don't silence, hurt, harm, or intimidate witnesses and victims. The system is completely broken.

"The main shooter we're looking at came from the front, and I don't think it was that Tyler dude." "I think that Tyler dude is a patsy." "I'm not buying the stuff that he was a lone shooter on the roof." "So first, he drives and drops this gun off in the woods." "Then he drives and parks his car on campus." "Then he jumps off the roof with a 24 inch barrel somehow secured to his leg." "The videos that they're saying of him carrying that body, you can't see." "I think that dude on the roof is a patsy."

There's no way they would run the same playbook twice. On 04/04/1968, Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. stepped onto the balcony of the Lorraine Motel in Memphis, Tennessee at 06:01 PM. Authorities say a single 30-odd-six rifle shot struck him in the jaw and neck, one shot, one kill. The police also find a bundle near the crime scene containing a Remington Model 760 rifle, binoculars, and personal items tied to one James Earl Ray, an escaped convict from Missouri. FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover quickly pronounced Ray to be a lone, racist, hate-filled assassin and there were no co-conspirators, no second shooter, and no larger plot. Didn't something like that happen just recently? Years later, the FBI and also the House Select Committee on Assassinations both admitted they could never conclusively match the fatal bullet to Ray's rifle. So in other words, the single most important piece of forensic proof tying Ray to the murder does not actually exist. And then there were the contradicting eyewitnesses. This is from the Washington Post: some witnesses, including then New York Times reporter Earl Caldwell, said that they saw a man moving in the thick bushes behind Jim's grill, which is near the crime scene, but in a location not where Ray was said to be. Then they say, for reasons unknown, Memphis Public Works employees cut down the bushes and destroyed a possible crime scene the very next morning. As always, when you follow the evidence or lack thereof, things just stop adding up.

Black people are white people because they also hate black people. There's a civil war within the black community between black people and "niggas," and "niggas" have got to go. "Niggas" ruin everything. The worst thing about "niggas" is they want credit for things they're supposed to do, like taking care of their kids. A "nigga" will brag about things a normal man just does. They act like it's an achievement not to go to jail, but you're not supposed to go to jail. It's a low expectation.

You know what's interesting about assassination? Well, not only does it change those popularity polls in a big fucking hurry, but it's also interesting to notice who it is we assassinate. Do ever notice who it is? Stop to think of who it is we kill. It's always people who've told us to live together in harmony and try to love one another. Jesus, Gandhi, Lincoln, John Kennedy, Bobby Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Medgar Evers, Malcolm x, John Lennon. They all said, try to live together peacefully. Bam. Right in the fucking head. Apparently, we're not ready for that. Yeah. That's difficult behavior for us.

"So we're supposed to believe that some random trans shooter was on the roof, took this shot, runs across into the rooftop, jumps down, somehow magically being undetected because the FBI releases a a video footage." "Was this when he was walking into the building, the then he must have already had planted the gun on the roof prior, and he somehow managed to walk back in the second time without the weapon." "And then because if he left with a weapon and hid it in the woods, then why didn't he have it on him when he was leaving?" "Didn't we watch criminal minds as a kid? Like, they have this super advanced software where they upload the image, and then the FBI just does their like, where's the BAU at and shit?" "Face recognition software. Match on the nose, ears, Boom. There he is."

"I thought the feds were saying they were looking for a bullet at some point, which is now very alarming to me. I don't understand that. How could they have been looking for a bullet? Because if I'm not seeing, and there isn't. I'm telling you, what happens in the front is not what happens in the back at all." "If I'm not seeing any blood, what what are we to take from that? The only thing that could make sense if what they're saying is true and that person took the shot from the place that they are saying that individual took the shot from, it would suggest that it it's a it it was inside of Charlie. Right? And they would know that. The feds would have known that." "So they would have communicated that they were never looking for a bullet."

I'm not sure if I'm the worst person, or even the killer. Have you ever met Tucker? We've talked a lot about this.