TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker asks if the Pfizer COVID vaccine was tested for its ability to stop virus transmission before being released. They request a clear yes or no answer and the data to be shared with the committee. The response states that they did not have prior knowledge of stopping transmission before the vaccine entered the market and had to rely on scientific research. Another speaker expresses outrage, claiming that people were pressured to get vaccinated based on the false belief that it would protect others.

The speaker asked if the Pfizer COVID vaccine was tested for stopping virus transmission before it was released. They wanted a clear yes or no answer and requested the data to be shared with the committee. In response, it was stated that no, they did not have knowledge about stopping transmission before the vaccine entered the market. They had to act quickly.

Vaccination is crucial for protecting oneself and others, and for society to return to normal. Vaccinated individuals are less likely to transmit the virus or get sick. Getting vaccinated and receiving booster shots can save lives and prevent the spread of infection. The goal is to become a dead end for the virus, stopping its transmission. Vaccinated people do not get infected and cannot be used as hosts to spread the virus. However, the initial emergency use authorization did not have sufficient data on the vaccine's effect on transmission. The speed of scientific progress necessitated quick action.

A group of European Parliament members wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) expressing concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines. The EMA responded, stating that the vaccines were only approved for individual immunization and not for controlling or preventing infections. They also admitted a lack of data on vaccine effectiveness against infections. The government's campaign to vaccinate for the sake of others was based on misinformation. Furthermore, the EMA emphasized the need to carefully consider safety information before administering vaccines. The mass vaccination campaign should be halted as it does not meet the EMA's requirements and puts people's health at risk. The government and supporting political parties should be held accountable for their lies and deception.

The White House blames a few bad actors for spreading online misinformation. The speaker disagrees with the idea that wearing masks is the best way to prevent infectious diseases. They mention that getting vaccinated provides the best protection against infection. The speaker also addresses the misconception that vaccines can make people worse. They mention the possibility of future challenges in infectious diseases and the need for rapid response to new threats. The speaker denies funding gain of function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology and denies lying before Congress.

A group of European Parliament members wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) expressing concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines. The EMA responded, stating that the vaccines were only approved for individual immunization, not for controlling or preventing infections. They also emphasized the lack of data on preventing infections and even mentioned that exposure to the virus could increase the risk of infection, even in vaccinated individuals. The EMA highlighted the importance of carefully considering safety information before administering vaccines. The government's vaccination campaigns were deemed unauthorized and based on misinformation. The EMA's information undermines the vaccination policies of the Dutch government, and they should be held accountable for their actions.

Speaker 0 questions understanding of vaccine causing myocarditis, mentioning Pfizer's awareness. Speaker 1 doubts if vaccine was tested for stopping transmission before market release. Speaker 0 believes vaccination was optional, not forced.

Thank you, Senator Canavan. Did Pfizer test if the COVID-19 vaccine could stop or reduce virus transmission before its late 2020 approval? To bring the vaccine to patients, we needed to show it was safe and effective in preventing illness, severe disease, and hospitalizations. The primary goal was to protect the vaccinated individual. I appreciate that, but my question remains unanswered. On December 3, 2020, your CEO stated that it was uncertain if vaccinated individuals could carry and spread the virus. Was he correct that Pfizer did not know if the vaccine could reduce transmission? We designed our clinical programs with regulatory agencies to demonstrate the vaccine's safety and effectiveness in preventing infections. Okay, let’s move on.

Last month, a group of European Parliament members, including myself, wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) expressing concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines. The EMA's response revealed shocking facts. They admitted that the vaccines were only approved for individual immunization and not for controlling or preventing infections. Furthermore, there is a lack of data supporting the vaccines' effectiveness in preventing infections. In fact, the EMA stated that repeated exposure to the virus increases the risk of infection even in vaccinated individuals. The government's campaigns promoting vaccination to protect others were unauthorized and based on misinformation. The EMA also emphasized the need to carefully consider safety information before administering vaccines. The mass vaccination efforts were in direct contradiction to the approved use of the vaccines. The government and supporting political parties should be held accountable for their lies and deception. The vaccination campaign needs to be halted as it is not safe and does not meet EMA requirements.

Last month, Joachim Küs and six other colleagues from the European Parliament wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) regarding concerns about the vaccines. The EMA responded, stating that the vaccines were only authorized for individual immunization and not for infection control, prevention, or reduction. In fact, the EMA highlighted a lack of data on contagion and stated that repeated exposure to the virus could increase the risk of infection even in vaccinated individuals. The massive vaccination campaigns aimed at protecting others were not authorized and lacked factual basis. The EMA emphasized that vaccinations were solely for the protection of the vaccinated individual, and safety information should be carefully considered before administering or recommending a vaccine. The government's vaccination policies disregarded this information, putting lives at risk. Vaccination campaigns should be halted immediately, and those responsible for the lies and deception held accountable.

Pfizer was asked if they tested whether their COVID-19 vaccine could reduce or stop the transmission of the virus before its approval. The Pfizer representative stated that the primary purpose of the vaccine was to protect the person who received it and prevent illness, severe disease, and hospitalizations. The senator then referred to a statement made by Pfizer's CEO on December 3, 2020, where he mentioned uncertainty about the vaccine's ability to reduce transmission. The Pfizer representative reiterated that their clinical programs were designed to demonstrate the vaccine's safety and effectiveness in preventing infections. Due to time constraints, the senator moved on without a definitive answer.

Vaccination is crucial for protecting oneself and others, allowing society to return to normal. Vaccinated individuals are unlikely to carry or get sick from the virus. Getting vaccinated and receiving booster shots can save lives and prevent the spread of infection. The probability of reducing transmission is believed to be 100%. Taking vaccines not only protects individuals and their families but also breaks the chain of transmission. Vaccinated people do not become infected and cannot spread the virus. However, it was initially unclear if the vaccines would stop transmission, as the data was limited. The speed of scientific progress necessitated quick action.

The speakers discuss the importance of vaccination in reducing transmission and returning to normalcy. They express confidence in the vaccines' ability to prevent illness and transmission. They emphasize the need for people to get vaccinated for their own protection and to break the chain of transmission. Vaccinated individuals are seen as dead ends for the virus, preventing further spread. However, it is mentioned that initial data on vaccine effectiveness against transmission was limited at the time of emergency use authorization. A question is raised about whether the Pfizer vaccine was tested for transmission prevention before its release, to which the response is that they had to move quickly based on scientific progress.

Our country is polluted with misinformation. When we reach a vaccination rate of 90-95%, instead of having 20,000 cases per day, we will have 500 or 300 cases, resulting in less impact on public health. However, the hope of ending the crisis was short-lived in France, as we set a new record of over 160,000 new cases. Some people on TV have never seen a Covid patient in their lives. Pfizer was chosen because they completed their phase three study first. The vaccine is still in the experimental phase, but claims that it is still in development are false. Vaccination reduces the risk of contamination by 12 or 6 times, and it also reduces the risk of transmission of the variant. This dissemination of misinformation is almost treasonous.

They claimed high effectiveness based on one COVID death in the vaccinated group versus two in the unvaccinated, out of 22,000 people. But effective for what, exactly? They kept saying it was a certain percentage effective, but the point was to negate the severity. I remember seeing videos of Fauci, Biden, Gates, and Bourla saying that if you take the vaccine, you can't get or pass COVID. If you want, I can even play the video for you. Regardless, it doesn't matter what Rachel Maddow says.

The Pfizer COVID vaccine was not tested for its ability to stop the transmission of the virus before it entered the market. The speaker acknowledges that they had to work quickly to understand the situation and move at the speed of science.

The White House blames a few bad actors for spreading online misinformation. The CDC states that vaccinated people don't carry the virus or get sick. They also say there are no safety concerns for pregnant or lactating individuals and their babies. However, a new paper using government data found a 1,200-fold increase in menstrual abnormalities after COVID-19 vaccination. Despite this, the CDC claims there are very few safety concerns. There was also a 57-fold increase in another outcome.

Vaccination is crucial for protecting oneself and others, and for society to return to normal. Vaccinated individuals are less likely to transmit the virus or get sick. Getting vaccinated and receiving booster shots can save lives and prevent the spread of infection. The goal is to become a dead end for the virus, stopping its transmission. Vaccinated people do not get infected and cannot be used as hosts to spread the virus. However, the initial emergency use authorization did not have sufficient data on the vaccine's effectiveness against transmission. The speed of scientific progress necessitated quick action.

The White House blames a few bad actors for spreading online misinformation. They say that misinformation on social media is harmful and can have long-term consequences. Developing a safe and effective vaccine takes time, usually around 10 to 25 years, and requires thorough clinical testing. The timeline for COVID-19 vaccines is similar to that of other vaccines.

Last month, I, along with six colleagues from the European Parliament, wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) expressing concerns about the COVID vaccines. The EMA's response revealed shocking facts. They admitted that the vaccines were only approved for individual immunization, not for controlling or preventing infections. The EMA emphasized the lack of data on the vaccines' ability to prevent transmission. In fact, repeated exposure to the virus could increase the risk of infection even in vaccinated individuals. The government's campaigns promoting vaccination to protect others were unauthorized and based on misinformation. The EMA also stated that vaccinations were solely for the protection of the vaccinated individual, and each case should be carefully evaluated for safety before administering the vaccine. The government's vaccination policy disregarded reporting of side effects within the first two weeks after vaccination, falsely attributing any complaints to the virus. This information exposes the flaws in the vaccination strategy and calls for an immediate halt to the campaign.

The speaker asked if the Pfizer COVID vaccine was tested for stopping virus transmission before it was released. They requested a clear yes or no answer and asked for the data to be shared with the committee. The speaker then stated that they did not have knowledge about stopping immunization before the vaccine entered the market.

A communication problem arose when it was intimated that vaccines would protect against getting COVID altogether, which wasn't supported by evidence. Vaccines protect against illness in the lower respiratory system, but the virus could still be carried in the upper airway and potentially spread. This led to distrust of mRNA vaccines, as people who got COVID after vaccination questioned the vaccine's effectiveness. Recent data shows that vaccines work well in preventing illness and infection, and make it unlikely that someone would pass the infection to someone else. The concern was that vaccinated people could be unwitting carriers, but recent data suggests this is very unlikely. Vaccinated people not wearing masks are not doing a disservice to their community. Unvaccinated people could be putting other unvaccinated people at risk. Institutions may require proof of vaccination, which will be a tough call.

Pfizer representatives appeared before the Senate Committee to address questions about their COVID-19 vaccine. The committee asked if Pfizer tested whether the vaccine could reduce virus transmission before its approval. Pfizer stated that their clinical trials focused on demonstrating the vaccine's safety and effectiveness in preventing illness, severe disease, and hospitalizations. The committee also questioned Pfizer's statements regarding the vaccine's ability to stop transmission. Pfizer representatives were unable to provide specific evidence for these claims and agreed to provide further information to the committee. The committee expressed concern about the discrepancy between Pfizer's statements and requested clarification on any updated statements from Pfizer officials.

Vaccination not only protects individuals but also reduces virus transmission, helping society return to normal. Current data indicates that vaccinated individuals do not carry the virus or get sick. Getting vaccinated and boosted can save lives and prevent serious illness. The goal is to stop the virus from spreading by ensuring vaccinated individuals act as dead ends for transmission. Vaccines are effective enough that when a vaccinated person is exposed, the virus cannot infect them or spread further. However, there was uncertainty about the vaccines' ability to stop transmission at the time of emergency use authorization. The data on this was limited, and it was acknowledged that the speed of development impacted the understanding of transmission prevention.

Vaccinated individuals can protect themselves and others by reducing transmission, allowing society to return to normal. Vaccines have been shown to prevent illness and decrease the spread of infection. It is crucial for people to get vaccinated and receive booster shots when eligible to save lives and prevent serious illness. The probability of reducing transmission is believed to be 100% by one speaker. The goal is to break the chain of transmission and become a dead end for the virus. Vaccinated individuals do not get infected or serve as hosts for the virus to spread. However, there were limited data on transmission when the vaccines received emergency use authorization. The speed of science was prioritized in developing the vaccines.