reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A board-certified emergency medicine physician believes healthcare professionals are experiencing moral injury, not just burnout. Moral injury is the pain of knowing the right thing for the patient but being unable to do it due to systemic barriers. This disconnect erodes their sense of purpose, and many are leaving the profession. The physician argues that the system doesn't place human health at the center, making it harder to uphold the Hippocratic oath. Insurance companies denying treatments, claiming they are not medically necessary, are not seeing the patient in real-time or drawing from clinical experience and intuition. Providers juggle insurance protocols, productivity metrics, hospital bureaucracy, and electronic medical records, taking them away from the patient. The United States spends more on healthcare than any other nation while delivering some of the worst outcomes because the system is deeply misaligned with care and having it be patient-first.

The speaker, a physician and psychiatrist, states that medicine faces the difficulty that most disease is preventable, but the medical field profits from curing or ameliorating disease with medications and procedures. The speaker claims that the medical field does not profit from preventing disease by encouraging people to socialize or exercise.

A healthcare worker is fed up with mask-wearing and inconsistencies in pandemic treatment across hospitals. They urge fellow healthcare professionals to speak out against government influence and lies in the media. It's time to tell the truth for the sake of their children.

He was caring for a patient who was doing well, but suddenly transferred to the emergency room. Shortly after, the patient died, leaving the speaker questioning if the hospital's actions led to his death. The speaker is confused and upset, feeling that the patient shouldn't have died and suspecting foul play.

The speaker claims to have witnessed a humanitarian catastrophe with millions of deaths worldwide due to vaccines. In their private practice, they've seen almost 1500 patients, previously healthy, now disabled and suffering years later, believing they are addressing the greatest unmet need in the country: care for the vaccine-injured. The speaker believes the government has been fully captured by corporations and industrial complexes. They allege that agencies like the CDC, FDA, NIH, and EPA, along with big food, are polluting air, water, and medicines. They also claim the government is allowing immigrants in, surveilling and censoring citizens, and stripping away rights, with most of the country unaware. The speaker states their goal is to educate people about this and "rescue the republic."

I'm watching patients get murdered. They aren't dying from COVID. They are medically mismanaging patients, and nobody cares. I've seen an anesthesiologist incorrectly intubate a patient, a resident defibrillate a patient with bradycardia, a nurse put an NG tube into someone's lungs, and another nurse give a deadly dose of insulin. Basic standards of care are not being met, like replacing blood in patients who desperately need it. They let patients rot on vents, and residents undo the work of day shifts by maxing out sedation. No one assesses patients properly, and they let them get acidotic until their kidneys shut down. I've seen a doctor rupture a subclavian vein and a patient bleed to death, and another patient choke on his own blood because of an incorrectly placed ET tube. These are minorities in the hood, and nobody cares. I need help to save these people.

The speaker states they were able to open an account and get a blue check mark after having to rebuild from losing an account with over 95,000 followers. The speaker believes "they" enjoy letting people build themselves up only to tear them down and make them rebuild. The speaker's account is "doctor Suzanne h seven" (drsuzanneh7). The speaker posts about vaccines and tries to stay in that lane, rather than posting opinions or pictures of pets.

The speaker expresses frustration with the VA's lack of continuity in mental health care. They have experienced multiple doctors quitting and switching, and the one doctor they liked refused to take their case back. They have been dealing with their own demons for the past two years and are tired of having to start over with a new doctor. They just want continuity of care and to be able to talk to the same person without having to retell their tormenting stories. The speaker feels let down by the government.

The speaker describes an incident involving a red hat that led to exhaustion. The speaker claims they were misdiagnosed by a Jewish doctor at a specific hospital, and that a specific media outlet was involved. The speaker states they cannot reveal the race, people, doctor, hospital, or media outlet involved, but then identifies the doctor as Jewish.

The speaker reflects on the rapid dehumanization that occurred in the medical field, where masks became a means of punishment. They question how this transformation happened and express concern for the loss of humanity in health professionals. The speaker recounts feeling abused and disrespected, with personal contact being solely focused on their mask. They fear that society has been distorted and wonders if it is possible for people to regain their previous selves and treat others with respect. The speaker shares an experience of being questioned and receiving abusive emails, feeling like the only victim in the situation.

Nobody is listening to the speaker as they witness medical negligence. They compare the situation to Nazi Germany, feeling alone in their efforts to speak out. Despite giving their all as a nurse, they feel helpless in saving patients from preventable deaths. The speaker questions if anyone else sees the harm being done, citing examples of medical errors leading to fatalities. They plead for help in finding a solution to stop the unnecessary deaths they witness.

The speaker states they will never consult a doctor about general health again, believing doctors are ignorant and only prescribe medication. They claim doctors don't understand human biology and only focus on prescribing medicine for every ailment, leading to multiple medications with numerous side effects. The speaker reports being previously prescribed medication for thyroid issues, high cholesterol, and high blood pressure. They are now on no medication, and their blood work is better than ever. The speaker feels significantly improved and believes they saved their own life.

Speaker 0 announces that they are retiring tomorrow, the last day of ten years working in a hospital, and shares key messages they believe others in the field should know. They reiterate their guidance: do not put your name on the donor registry, even though you can donate and share your life or organs; they note that their prior video with this point was taken down, but they are repeating it. They express strong, conspiratorial concerns about food safety, claiming they are being harmed by what is put in food because of a for-profit health care system aimed at making people sick to drive health-care spending. They pose questions about how cancer, diabetes, and other diseases are caused, attributing these to diet and processed foods, and urge stopping processed foods. They urge listeners to stop vaping and state a personal view that cigarettes might be a better option than vaping. They describe cases of people with pneumothorax resulting from vaping cartridges being used too aggressively, and warn that vaping can send someone to an early grave. They also suggest a cynical view about aging and social security, implying society does not want people to reach old age for financial reasons, and question what defense people have in the country, framing life as a basic wish to live without being obstructed. They advise always getting a second opinion after any medical diagnosis, emphasizing that doctors can be fallible and that one should seek multiple opinions to protect oneself. Despite these warnings, Speaker 0 expresses gratitude for the field of medicine, noting pride in learning, meeting amazing people, and the daily opportunity to help others. They describe waking up every day to assist someone as filling their heart and state a hope that more medical people feel the same. The address ends on a personal note about retirement, with Speaker 0 asking the audience to share what their day looks like as they retire the next day.

The speaker expresses hope that Jill Biden will become Surgeon General. The speaker refers to Jill Biden as a doctor and emphasizes that she is an amazing doctor. The speaker acknowledges the possibility of being wrong about Jill Biden's profession. The speaker also states that she is a teacher.

The speaker suggests that the medical field is controlled by big pharmaceutical companies, whom they compare to a mafia. They claim that these companies create medications that have harmful side effects and keep people dependent on doctors. The speaker also believes that the more one relies on medical treatments, the sicker they become. They mention chemotherapy as a lucrative treatment, but assert that there is a cure for cancer, which they attribute to God.

Patients are being harmed due to gross negligence and mismanagement in the hospital. Despite witnessing numerous incidents, such as incorrect intubations and inappropriate treatments, no one seems to care. Staff are ignoring basic standards of care, like timely blood transfusions for critically low patients. There are cases of patients being assigned to staff who are unqualified to operate necessary medical equipment. Even when issues are raised, they are dismissed. The speaker feels isolated in their concerns, as many colleagues acknowledge the problems but do not take action. The situation is dire, with patients suffering from preventable harm, and the speaker is desperate for help to address these issues.

The speaker discusses their experience as a nurse in New York during the COVID-19 pandemic. They express their belief that there was a mass plan to promote fear and suffering, and to deny early treatment. They witnessed negligence in the treatment of patients and felt that the focus was on using ventilators instead of exploring alternative treatments. The speaker also raises concerns about the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines, citing reports of adverse effects and questioning the rush to vaccinate. They criticize the censorship of medical professionals who express differing opinions and emphasize the need for people to wake up to the larger agenda at play.

When treating COVID patients, some didn't want to go to the hospital even with low oxygen levels. The speaker felt it was criminal to not try to save them. None of the speaker's patients died during the pandemic while following their protocols, which varied based on individual risk factors. The speaker doesn't want to rely solely on AI for medical advice, preferring a physician's sympathy and experience. They want the freedom to choose their treatment, even if it means taking a risky route for a chance at a longer life. The speaker trusts God and is willing to "jump in the abyss," accepting the potential consequences. They believe it's crucial to protect freedom of choice, speech, ideas, and innovation.

They are witnessing medical negligence and deaths in a hospital, with patients not dying from COVID. Instances include incorrect intubation, wrong medications, and lack of proper care. Despite efforts to advocate for patients, the situation remains dire. The speaker expresses frustration at the lack of action and concern for the patients' well-being.

The speaker states it is difficult to work with serenity because they are attacked daily from every part of the landscape. The general press is aggressive, the health authorities are aggressive, and the government is not supportive. Despite these difficulties, the speaker insists that they must persevere because the issue is important. The speaker then transitions to asking about a return to Keel University.

After working in critical care and directly caring for COVID patients in the ICU throughout the pandemic, the speaker says that after eighteen months of “chaos” they left the bedside because they could not “watch one more of [their] patients needlessly die” due to “deadly hospital protocols” and “denial of life saving medications.” They state that people were being told COVID was killing all patients, but they contend it was instead “complete and total medical mismanagement of COVID” that was killing them. The speaker asks why, if patients were dying of the virus itself, bodies were not being pulled from homes and off the streets “en masse.” They claim that the reality is that patients “aren’t dying at home” or “on our streets,” and that they are “dying in our hospitals,” which they say raises the question of why that is happening. They describe walking away from the bedside but say what haunts them are the faces of patients they believed did not need to die. They say they were never comfortable with death, but learned in nursing—especially in the ICU—that “there are fates far worse than death.” The speaker says they considered it an honor to provide compassion in patients’ last moments, but that this situation was different. They say these patients did not die from “a disease” or “a virus,” and instead died in what they call a “hospital holocaust.” They describe the system as “shamelessly corrupt,” using what they characterize as well intentioned nurses to carry out a “sinister plan.” They compare ventilators to “new gas chambers.” Finally, they state they witnessed “numerous alarming signs” that “these novel vaccines were causing great harm” to their patients.

The speaker, whose background is in critical care, worked throughout the pandemic in the ICU providing direct care to COVID patients. After eighteen months of what they describe as “chaos,” they left the bedside because they “could not watch one more” of their patients “needlessly die” due to “deadly hospital protocols” and the “denial of life saving medications.” They state that hospital messaging said COVID was killing all patients, but they contend that “this was not the case at all,” and instead that “the complete and total medical mismanagement of COVID” was killing them. They argue that if patients were truly dying of the virus itself, there would be widespread deaths outside healthcare settings, asking why bodies were not being pulled “from homes and off of the streets en masse.” They then assert that “patients… they’re not dying at home” and “they’re not dying on our streets,” and claim that people are dying “in our hospitals,” saying it is “time that we start asking ourselves why.” Although they “walked away,” they say one thing that still haunts them from bedside work is the patients’ “faces”—specifically the faces of patients they “knew didn’t need to die.” They describe not being comfortable with death initially, but learning that death comes for all of us eventually. They say that in nursing—especially in the ICU—they learned that there are “fates far worse than death.” They describe providing compassion in a patient’s last moments as an “honor,” emphasizing care and compassion during end-of-life periods. They frame their experience during the pandemic as “different,” saying these patients “didn’t die from a disease” and “didn’t die from a virus,” but instead “died in a hospital holocaust.” They use this description to claim that a “shamelessly corrupt system,” which they say used “well intentioned nurses” to carry out a “sinister plan,” was responsible. They further state that “ventilators” are “the new gas chambers.” Finally, the speaker says they did not leave before witnessing “numerous alarming signs” that “these novel vaccines were causing great harm” to their patients.

The speaker claims to have woken up paralyzed and naked on a table in a laboratory. She says scientists were present and doing something they wanted to keep secret. She states she experienced severe panic attacks after this incident, leading to ten hospitalizations. Prior to this, she says she was a healthy and happy person. She wants to know what was done to her and will not stop until she finds out. She is willing to take a lie detector test to prove her claims.

Speaker 0 questions why they should leave their family and who will care for their patients. They believe they have the right to proper healthcare and didn't spend years in medical school just to think about themselves. They ask if this is the reason they became a doctor.

The speaker, a nurse, shares their experiences on the front lines of the COVID-19 pandemic. They express concerns about medical negligence and malfeasance, particularly regarding the use of the drug Remdesivir, which they claim is causing patient deaths. The nurse also mentions the lack of advocacy for marginalized populations and criticizes the isolation and lack of basic care in hospitals. They highlight the importance of nurses as the link between doctors and patients and express gratitude for the opportunity to speak out.