reSee.it - Related Video Feed

As a child, the speaker received three vaccines. By 1986, children received 11 doses of five vaccines. Now, children in states with mandates may receive 69 to 92 vaccines between conception and age 18, with varying dose requirements depending on the brand. Each vaccine is designed to permanently alter the immune system. The speaker believes this contributes to an epidemic of immune dysregulation. The speaker suggests vaccines could be a key culprit in the rise of diseases like diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, seizure disorders, ADD, ADHD, speech delay, language delay, tics, Tourette's syndrome, narcolepsy, and autism, which the speaker claims were rare in their childhood. The speaker believes this generation is damaged by these diseases.

The era of vaccines is over. The transcript argues that people have been vaccinating since the 1700s, when bloodletting was state-of-the-art medicine. It says that in that period, they did not even have a theory of viruses and bacteria; instead, they relied on crude practices. The transcript claims that this technology has failed. It further states that it has been revealed to cause catastrophic harms in the population. The transcript then contrasts treatments for bacteria and viruses by saying that the treatment for bacteria is antibiotics, and the treatment for viruses should be antivirals. On that basis, the transcript concludes that vaccines have no place in medicine going forward. It presents this as the endpoint: “That’s where we’re gonna get to.” The transcript also frames the near future as a period of conflict, stating that there will be “a lot of hard fighting between now and arriving at what the data actually show.” It asserts that the “data” already show the conclusion that vaccines should not have a place in medicine going forward, and that the main difference is the time required for acceptance of what it claims the data already indicate. Overall, the transcript’s main points are: vaccines are said to be obsolete (“The era of vaccines is over”); vaccination is described as having started in the 1700s under medical conditions where bloodletting was standard and there was no theory of viruses and bacteria; the transcript claims the vaccine approach has failed and has caused catastrophic harms; it asserts a division of medical treatments where antibiotics are for bacteria and antivirals are for viruses; and it ends by stating that vaccines should be removed from medicine going forward, with ongoing hard fighting until the conclusions match the data it says are already available.

The speaker claims that the flu vaccine's purpose has shifted from preventing the flu to only lessening symptoms. A Cleveland Clinic study allegedly found the flu vaccine had a negative efficacy of 26.9% last winter. According to the speaker, this means that individuals who received the flu vaccine were 26.9% more likely to contract influenza. The speaker notes the study doesn't detail the pharmaceutical industry's profits from the vaccine or list its side effects. They state the side effects would be less than an mRNA vaccine, as it is a dead virus vaccine. The speaker reiterates that taking the flu shot allegedly makes one almost 27% more likely to get sick than not taking it.

The speaker discusses their personal experience with patients developing kidney failure after vaccination and how they started noticing a pattern of vaccines being given to very ill patients. They question the belief that polio disappeared solely because of the vaccine and present data showing that the majority of people infected with poliovirus have no symptoms or only minor symptoms. They suggest that vaccinating every child is unnecessary and question the official history of polio vaccines. They also discuss the use of DDT and arsenic during the time of polio outbreaks and how changes in diagnostic criteria and vaccine formulations contributed to the decline in reported polio cases. They highlight the increase in cases of acute flaccid paralysis and question the effectiveness and safety of polio vaccines.

The speaker argues that public health authorities deserve credit for the large decline in measles deaths in America that occurred before the first measles vaccine was introduced. They reference data they say is available on the CDC website, noting that between 1900 and 1960–1962 the mortality rate for measles declined by over 98 percent, a trend that existed before the vaccine's introduction in 1963. The speaker stresses that this decline was not caused by the vaccine, since there was no measles vaccine in the early period. They propose several public health factors as contributors to the decline, including nutrition and sanitation, clean water, sewage management, and basic living conditions such as ensuring natural light in tenement buildings. They also highlight quarantine practices and the practice of advising sick individuals to stay at home and rest, even if not the kind of enforced stay-at-home measures discussed in other contexts. The speaker notes that, in the years immediately before vaccination, roughly 400 Americans died per year from measles, averaging about one death per 500,000 people, illustrating that mortality was still a real concern even as the downward trajectory was already underway. The speaker acknowledges that measles can still be lethal in certain contexts and that there were pockets of the United States in the early 1960s that resembled conditions in less developed parts of the world. They emphasize that the declining mortality rate continued after the vaccine was introduced in 1963, describing the trajectory as ongoing and implying that vaccine influence is not the sole or definitive cause of the earlier decline. When addressing contemporary public health messaging, the speaker notes that public health authorities today often claim that measles caused the decline and that the measles vaccine caused the decline in mortality, but they allegedly do not discuss the other public health efforts that contributed. The underlying point is that attribution of the decline is contested, and the role of broad public health measures should be acknowledged alongside vaccination. The speaker repeatedly stresses that the data cited are uncontroversial and data-driven, and that the discussion centers on attribution and emphasis rather than disputing the data itself.

The speaker asserts that the MMR and MMR V vaccines have been linked to two thousand six hundred percent more deaths than measles infection since 1995. The claim is that for the past thirty years, the MMR shots have killed far more children than measles, and that hundreds of infants and toddlers died after these shots, often from SIDS (sudden infant death syndrome), cardiac arrest, seizures, and encephalitis. The speaker emphasizes that these shots are killing some of these children, with most deaths occurring within about two weeks after the shot, and forty percent dying within one week. The speaker notes that the temporality checks out and that most of these deaths occurred at ages one to one and a half, right when they receive the MMR shots. The speaker reports that twenty-five percent of these deaths were classified as sudden infant death syndrome. The speaker describes babies dying in their sleep as a result of these shots and calls the situation absolutely disturbing and particular in terms of the causes of death. In summary, the speaker states that all of this combined in the study shows unequivocally that these shots are deadly, and concludes that the MMR and MMRV shots should not be given anymore. The suggestion is to split them up if parents still want them, rather than administering the full combination.

Excess deaths of about 1,000 per week have been observed during the pandemic, even after adjusting for an aging and growing population. The rate of death in Britain is expected to increase due to an aging population, but the excess deaths are also affecting younger age groups. These unusual and alarming figures were initially attributed to people not receiving statins, but the effect of lockdown measures and misdiagnosis also played a role. Interestingly, the excess deaths started around the same time as the vaccine program, but this correlation has not been thoroughly investigated. The speaker expresses skepticism about the vaccines, stating that adverse effects are more common than claimed and that the vaccines are targeting a virus that has already evolved. The speaker's skepticism has made them a pariah in academic and medical circles.

According to the speaker, the all-cause mortality data contradicts the idea of a viral respiratory pandemic. They argue that spikes in mortality during the COVID period were due to assaults on vulnerable people through medical treatment. Different jurisdictions had different methods of assault, such as overusing HCQ or using ventilators. They claim that more than half the countries in the world had no excess mortality until the vaccines were rolled out, which resulted in a surge of deaths. Even in India, there was no excess mortality until the vaccines were introduced, causing a significant increase in deaths.

In this video, the speaker discusses their conclusions on all-cause mortality and the pandemic. They claim that if governments had not taken any extraordinary measures, there would have been no excess mortality beyond the usual trend. They argue that the measures implemented by governments caused varying levels of excess mortality in different jurisdictions. Additionally, they assert that the COVID-19 vaccination campaign itself resulted in excess mortality, with different doses and age groups being associated with peaks in deaths. The speaker promises to provide specific numbers in their presentation.

Speaker 0 argues that the myth that vaccines are safe and necessary and that they eradicated childhood disease is false. He claims vaccines have never been tested for safety and that there are no placebo-controlled trials; in trials, the control group is given the immunogens that are in the vaccine, making the comparison deceptive. He emphasizes that vaccines typically contain a protein plus an accompanying substance—the adjuvant or immunogen—that stimulates an immune response, and that these adjuvants (such as aluminum or other substances) by themselves are dangerous. When the control group receives these adjuvants along with the experimental group, he says the side effects are similar, describing this as a “slight hand trick” and “extremely deceptive.” He notes that for the last forty years people have been shouting that there has not been a true placebo-controlled trial with saline. He then argues that if one looks at the history of all the childhood illnesses that vaccines target, they were almost all nearly eradicated before the introduction of the vaccine. He claims that the impression vaccines stop childhood illnesses is not true; almost all illnesses had reduced to extremely low levels due to sanitation and hygiene, development, and some antibiotics. Regarding the vaccines themselves, he states that the true data and history of these vaccines are “really horrible.” He mentions a history of lack of safety and relates it to sudden infant death syndrome, asserting that it “suddenly came out of nowhere as we suspended the schedule” and asks when death occurs. He asserts that sudden infant death syndrome is reproducible in that it occurs at two months, four months, and six months, and that most of those deaths occur within days to a couple of weeks of the vaccine. He concludes with a strong personal stance: if he had his young children today, he would not give them a single vaccine.

The transcript discusses the book Vaccinations Do Not Protect by Eleanor McBean, claiming that vaccination goes against the constitution to take this “garbage.” It asserts that most people don’t know that doctors do not take the shots themselves or give them to their own children, yet they administer them to other people’s children because they receive a commission. It notes that certain physicians have observed patterns such as paralysis within twenty-four hours after the injection, up to six months after, cancer near the injection area, and diseases such as TB within twenty years. The speaker claims that Edward Jenner, the father of vaccination, noticed a similar pattern in 1796, describing it as poisoning the people. The question is posed: why do they do this? The answer given is that vaccination is a big business, and that it is protected by the government. The speaker asserts that vaccination was protected by the government in 1986 so that people cannot sue. It is stated as part of the argument that vaccination is the leading cause of why children die under the age of 15.

Speaker 0 asserts that there is no safe vaccine on the childhood schedule and labels themselves an anti-vaxxer because no vaccine has been properly tested for safety. They state that, in the book Vax Facts, you are more likely to die from the vaccine than from the disease for which there is a vaccine, and that this is true for every single vaccine on the childhood schedule. They acknowledge that death from the vaccine is still a death and “super rare,” but claim you are much more likely to die from the vaccine. They ask which do you want: a greater chance of dying from the vaccine or a lesser chance of dying from the disease, noting that for many of these diseases, the risk is zero.

In recent years, global mortality rates have been lower compared to the past 50 years, with a spike in 2018 due to new vaccines. Despite claims of a deadly pandemic, mortality rates have remained lower than in 1952. People were getting sick, but not dying at alarming rates. This raises questions about the severity of the pandemic.

Between 1900 and the introduction of the measles vaccine in 1963, the measles mortality rate in America declined by over 98%. This decline had nothing to do with vaccines because there was no measles vaccine at the time. Public health authorities should take credit for this due to improved nutrition, sanitation, clean water, and quarantine practices. In the years before the vaccine, around 400 Americans a year died of measles, which was one in 500,000 Americans. The mortality rate was already declining when the measles vaccine was introduced in 1963. It can be debated how much of the further decline is attributable to the vaccine versus continued public health efforts. Public health authorities today claim the measles vaccine caused the decline in mortality, without mentioning the other factors.

The speaker discusses polio and vaccines by tracing how the disease is perceived versus the data. Polio is described as “the worst disease in world history, not actually, but that's the spin,” and similarly framed as “completely eliminated by mass vaccination, not actually, but that's the spin.” Looking at polio globally, with eight billion people on Earth, the speaker asks how many people died last year from polio, answering “Zero.” The number who had paralysis from polio is stated as “Five hundred and sixty, and ninety seven percent of them was vaccine strain or vaccine induced poliomyelitis.” The speaker notes that opponents claim this is due to vaccination, but then raises the question of how that accounts for more than a billion people on Earth who never had the polio vaccine, asserting they have the exact same death rate. The argument is extended to measles, with the claim that the death rate is the same whether or not one is vaccinated, and similarly for other diseases. The speaker emphasizes a specific approach used in a book: “the only way to do it, I think, compare the product, are they all the same? The diseases, are they all the same?” This leads to the central question of how to handle risk for one’s children. A quick final point compares vaccine decisions to everyday risk decisions. Parents weigh disease risk and vaccine risk when deciding whether their kids should engage in activities such as football, which could involve a head injury; riding a bicycle at night, which could lead to injury; or sleeping over at someone’s house. The speaker argues that all of these are risk decisions quite similar to the vaccine and disease decision because you have to weigh the disease and weigh the vaccine. Yet, the speaker notes, there has never been a mandate for football, and there has never been a mandate that children not ride bikes at night in their neighborhood, or that they not sleep over at someone’s house if they don’t feel good about it in their particular neighborhood.

The speaker discusses all-cause mortality and presents data from various countries, including France, the USA, and Romania. They highlight the seasonal pattern of mortality, with higher deaths in the winter and lower deaths in the summer. The speaker questions the understanding of this pattern and argues that it is not fully comprehended. They also analyze historical events such as the Spanish flu, the Great Depression, and wars, showing their impact on mortality rates. The speaker then focuses on the COVID-19 pandemic, discussing the effects of aggressive medical treatments, socioeconomic factors, and vaccines on mortality. They present data suggesting that vaccines may have caused excess deaths, particularly among the elderly.

A recent paper reported that two-month-old infants who received all six CDC-recommended vaccines had about a 68% increased odds of dying in the following month compared to unvaccinated infants. The speaker says this adds to a body of evidence described as 12 studies comparing vaccinated individuals to unvaccinated individuals. According to the speaker, all 12 studies found the same overall pattern: vaccinated individuals are “far sicker” than unvaccinated individuals. The speaker lists multiple categories of health differences reported in those comparisons, stating that vaccinated individuals have more chronic disease and more autoimmune disease. They also report higher rates of neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism, speech delays, and speech disorders. The speaker also says vaccinated individuals have more ticks and more skin disorders, describing these as part of “everything under the sun.” The speaker then describes an additional analysis related to the Henry Ford study. They say they “recently expanded on that in a reanalysis of the Henry Ford study,” finding that all 22 chronic disease categories were higher in vaccinated children. This is presented as extending the pattern beyond the specific mortality finding, adding chronic disease elevations alongside mortality elevation. The speaker characterizes the combined results as “very serious” and emphasizes that it should be discussed more widely and replicated in other states. The call to action is focused on starting to talk about the findings and replicating them elsewhere, rather than limiting the conclusions to the initial studies or settings described.

Three papers by Nathaniel Mead, containing nearly a thousand references, concluded that COVID-19 vaccination risks outweigh any theoretical benefits. According to the speaker, wishful thinking suggests vaccines saved lives and reduced severity, but early multi-drug treatment, not vaccines, reduced the risk of death. The speaker claims a marathon runner died because he didn't receive effective early treatment, and his vaccination status was irrelevant. The CDC allegedly knew that thousands of fully vaccinated patients were dying of acute COVID-19 early in 2021, making it obvious the vaccines did not reduce the risk of death. The speaker does not want America to be fooled into thinking that the vaccines save lives because they didn't.

The transcript argues that discussions of vaccines should be approached as part of eugenics, claiming that this is where the concept originates. It then cites medical claims attributed to “doctor Henry,” stating that “numerous vaccinations” and the “medical monopoly” have caused “more disease and suffering than I could name.” The speaker claims that diseases such as cancer, syphilis, and cold sores are “direct result[s] of vaccination.” Next, it references “doctor Herbert Snow,” asserting that doctors are “always fire[d]” and claiming that in recent years “many women and men in the prime of life have dropped dead suddenly.” The speaker says this resembles 2020 and claims that after attending a feast or banquet, “eighty percent of the deaths are caused by inoculation or vaccination.” Finally, it cites “doctor Clark,” claiming that cancer was “practically unknown” until vaccinations with cowpox vaccine were introduced. The speaker adds personal testimony: the speaker “had to deal with at least two hundred cases of cancer” and “never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person.”

Speaker 0 asserts that the era of vaccines is over. Vaccinating has been done since the seventeen hundreds, back when bloodletting was state of the art medicine. They didn’t even have a theory of viruses and bacteria back then; they just had crude practices. That technology has failed. It has been revealed to cause catastrophic harms in the population. The treatment for bacteria is antibiotics, and the treatment for viruses should be antivirals. Vaccines have no place in medicine going forward. That’s where we’re gonna get to. That’s what the data actually show us right now. It’s just gonna be a lot of hard fighting between now and arriving at what the data is already showing us right now.

The discussion ties vaccines to eugenics and then cites multiple doctors’ claims about harm from vaccination. Henry is described as saying that, in his honest opinion, vaccines have caused more disease and suffering than he could name, and that diseases such as cancer, syphilis, and cold sores are direct results of vaccination. Herbert Snow is described as arguing that, in recent years, many women and men in the prime of life have dropped dead suddenly, and that often, after attending a feast or banquet, about eighty percent of deaths are caused by inoculation or vaccination. Doctor Clark is presented as saying that cancer was practically unknown until vaccinations with cowpox vaccine were introduced, that he dealt with at least two hundred cancer cases, and that he never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person.

The speaker argues that unvaccinated populations “won’t do it” and offers an example involving the DTP vaccine (diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis). They state that the vaccine was removed from use in “this country” because it was causing injuries, including “severe brain injuries, or death to one in every three hundred children,” and that in the 1980s its use led to litigation against vaccine companies, which precipitated the passage of the Vaccine Act that gave them immunity from liability. The speaker then contrasts countries, saying the DTP vaccine is banned or not used in “Europe” and the “America,” but is given to “one hundred and sixty one million African children a year.” They claim that Bill Gates asked the Danish government to support the program, saying it saved “thirty million lives,” but that the Danish government asked for the data and “wasn’t able to” receive it. The Danish government then conducted its own studies by going to Africa and reviewing “thirty years of DTP data.” According to the speaker, the Danish government’s studies found that girls who received DTP were dying at “10 times the rate” of unvaccinated girls, and that the causes of death were not ones associated with diphtheria, tetanus, or pertussis. The speaker lists deaths attributed to diphtheria, anemia, malaria, bilharzia, pulmonary disease, respiratory disease, pneumonia, and other “minor diseases.” The speaker concludes that for “thirty years” no one noticed that the vaccinated girls—not unvaccinated girls—were dying, and they claim DTP protected girls against diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis while “also ruined their immune systems,” leaving them “unable to defend themselves against other” illnesses that other children with “hearty immune systems” could fend off.

"Only half the children in the country got that vaccine, and the other half didn't." "no routine vaccine was tested for overall effect on mortality in randomized trials before being introduced." "The program we are talking about at this time, the vaccine program, was introduced sort of in the late seventies after the success with the eradication of smallpox." "When you come out here, you had two point three times higher mortality if you were DTP vaccinated." "So the moving cough vaccine or the pertussis vaccine was associated with two fold higher mortality." "You can have a vaccine which is fully protected against a specific disease, but associated with higher mortality." "Once they looked at it, they were dying at 5x the rate of all of these other issues."

The transcript references the book Vaccinations Do Not Protect by Eleanor McBean and presents several assertions about vaccines and the vaccination system. It claims that the book argues taking vaccines is unconstitutional and labels vaccines as “garbage,” suggesting that vaccination is a large, protected industry. It asserts that doctors do not take the shots themselves, do not give them to their own children, but administer them to other people’s children because they receive a commission. The speaker states that some physicians have noticed patterns associated with vaccines, including paralysis within twenty-four hours after an injection, paralysis up to six months after an injection, cancer near the injection site, and diseases such as tuberculosis within twenty years. The speaker also notes that Edward Jenner, the father of vaccination, noticed a similar pattern of “poisoning the people” in 1796. The transcript emphasizes that vaccination is a big business and claims it is protected by the government. It references 1986 as a key date when vaccination was protected by the government so that people cannot sue. The speaker concludes by asserting that vaccination is the leading cause of death among children under the age of 15. Throughout, the claims are presented as facts or observations within the book and its interpretation, with emphasis on alleged patterns, motivations, and systemic protections surrounding vaccination.

Speaker 0 asserts that the MMR and MMR V vaccines have been linked to two thousand six hundred percent more deaths than measles infection since 1995. The speaker claims that, over the past thirty years, the MMR shots have killed far more children than measles, identifying hundreds of infants and toddlers who died after these shots, often from SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome, cardiac arrest, seizures, and encephalitis. The speaker states that most of these deaths occurred within about two weeks after the shot, with forty percent dying within one week. The deaths are described as temporally linked to the vaccination, with the majority of fatalities occurring at ages one to one and a half, which the speaker notes as the time they receive the MMR shots. The speaker claims that twenty-five percent of these deaths were classified as sudden infant death syndrome. The overall claim is that these shots are killing the babies in their sleep, described as absolutely disturbing and as part of a broader study. The speaker concludes that the shots are deadly and that the MMR and MMRV shots should not be given anymore; if parents still want them, they should be split up rather than administered as a combined dose, labeling the current approach as “the full load of garbage.”