TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

As a child, the speaker received three vaccines. By 1986, children received 11 doses of five vaccines. Now, children in states with mandates may receive 69 to 92 vaccines between conception and age 18, with varying dose requirements depending on the brand. Each vaccine is designed to permanently alter the immune system. The speaker believes this contributes to an epidemic of immune dysregulation. The speaker suggests vaccines could be a key culprit in the rise of diseases like diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, seizure disorders, ADD, ADHD, speech delay, language delay, tics, Tourette's syndrome, narcolepsy, and autism, which the speaker claims were rare in their childhood. The speaker believes this generation is damaged by these diseases.

The speaker claims that the flu vaccine's purpose has shifted from preventing the flu to only lessening symptoms. A Cleveland Clinic study allegedly found the flu vaccine had a negative efficacy of 26.9% last winter. According to the speaker, this means that individuals who received the flu vaccine were 26.9% more likely to contract influenza. The speaker notes the study doesn't detail the pharmaceutical industry's profits from the vaccine or list its side effects. They state the side effects would be less than an mRNA vaccine, as it is a dead virus vaccine. The speaker reiterates that taking the flu shot allegedly makes one almost 27% more likely to get sick than not taking it.

The speaker discusses their personal experience with patients developing kidney failure after vaccination and how they started noticing a pattern of vaccines being given to very ill patients. They question the belief that polio disappeared solely because of the vaccine and present data showing that the majority of people infected with poliovirus have no symptoms or only minor symptoms. They suggest that vaccinating every child is unnecessary and question the official history of polio vaccines. They also discuss the use of DDT and arsenic during the time of polio outbreaks and how changes in diagnostic criteria and vaccine formulations contributed to the decline in reported polio cases. They highlight the increase in cases of acute flaccid paralysis and question the effectiveness and safety of polio vaccines.

The speaker argues that public health authorities deserve credit for the large decline in measles deaths in America that occurred before the first measles vaccine was introduced. They reference data they say is available on the CDC website, noting that between 1900 and 1960–1962 the mortality rate for measles declined by over 98 percent, a trend that existed before the vaccine's introduction in 1963. The speaker stresses that this decline was not caused by the vaccine, since there was no measles vaccine in the early period. They propose several public health factors as contributors to the decline, including nutrition and sanitation, clean water, sewage management, and basic living conditions such as ensuring natural light in tenement buildings. They also highlight quarantine practices and the practice of advising sick individuals to stay at home and rest, even if not the kind of enforced stay-at-home measures discussed in other contexts. The speaker notes that, in the years immediately before vaccination, roughly 400 Americans died per year from measles, averaging about one death per 500,000 people, illustrating that mortality was still a real concern even as the downward trajectory was already underway. The speaker acknowledges that measles can still be lethal in certain contexts and that there were pockets of the United States in the early 1960s that resembled conditions in less developed parts of the world. They emphasize that the declining mortality rate continued after the vaccine was introduced in 1963, describing the trajectory as ongoing and implying that vaccine influence is not the sole or definitive cause of the earlier decline. When addressing contemporary public health messaging, the speaker notes that public health authorities today often claim that measles caused the decline and that the measles vaccine caused the decline in mortality, but they allegedly do not discuss the other public health efforts that contributed. The underlying point is that attribution of the decline is contested, and the role of broad public health measures should be acknowledged alongside vaccination. The speaker repeatedly stresses that the data cited are uncontroversial and data-driven, and that the discussion centers on attribution and emphasis rather than disputing the data itself.

The speaker asserts that the MMR and MMR V vaccines have been linked to two thousand six hundred percent more deaths than measles infection since 1995. The claim is that for the past thirty years, the MMR shots have killed far more children than measles, and that hundreds of infants and toddlers died after these shots, often from SIDS (sudden infant death syndrome), cardiac arrest, seizures, and encephalitis. The speaker emphasizes that these shots are killing some of these children, with most deaths occurring within about two weeks after the shot, and forty percent dying within one week. The speaker notes that the temporality checks out and that most of these deaths occurred at ages one to one and a half, right when they receive the MMR shots. The speaker reports that twenty-five percent of these deaths were classified as sudden infant death syndrome. The speaker describes babies dying in their sleep as a result of these shots and calls the situation absolutely disturbing and particular in terms of the causes of death. In summary, the speaker states that all of this combined in the study shows unequivocally that these shots are deadly, and concludes that the MMR and MMRV shots should not be given anymore. The suggestion is to split them up if parents still want them, rather than administering the full combination.

Excess deaths of about 1,000 per week have been observed during the pandemic, even after adjusting for an aging and growing population. The rate of death in Britain is expected to increase due to an aging population, but the excess deaths are also affecting younger age groups. These unusual and alarming figures were initially attributed to people not receiving statins, but the effect of lockdown measures and misdiagnosis also played a role. Interestingly, the excess deaths started around the same time as the vaccine program, but this correlation has not been thoroughly investigated. The speaker expresses skepticism about the vaccines, stating that adverse effects are more common than claimed and that the vaccines are targeting a virus that has already evolved. The speaker's skepticism has made them a pariah in academic and medical circles.

According to the speaker, the all-cause mortality data contradicts the idea of a viral respiratory pandemic. They argue that spikes in mortality during the COVID period were due to assaults on vulnerable people through medical treatment. Different jurisdictions had different methods of assault, such as overusing HCQ or using ventilators. They claim that more than half the countries in the world had no excess mortality until the vaccines were rolled out, which resulted in a surge of deaths. Even in India, there was no excess mortality until the vaccines were introduced, causing a significant increase in deaths.

In this video, the speaker discusses their conclusions on all-cause mortality and the pandemic. They claim that if governments had not taken any extraordinary measures, there would have been no excess mortality beyond the usual trend. They argue that the measures implemented by governments caused varying levels of excess mortality in different jurisdictions. Additionally, they assert that the COVID-19 vaccination campaign itself resulted in excess mortality, with different doses and age groups being associated with peaks in deaths. The speaker promises to provide specific numbers in their presentation.

Speaker 0 argues that the myth that vaccines are safe and necessary and that they eradicated childhood disease is false. He claims vaccines have never been tested for safety and that there are no placebo-controlled trials; in trials, the control group is given the immunogens that are in the vaccine, making the comparison deceptive. He emphasizes that vaccines typically contain a protein plus an accompanying substance—the adjuvant or immunogen—that stimulates an immune response, and that these adjuvants (such as aluminum or other substances) by themselves are dangerous. When the control group receives these adjuvants along with the experimental group, he says the side effects are similar, describing this as a “slight hand trick” and “extremely deceptive.” He notes that for the last forty years people have been shouting that there has not been a true placebo-controlled trial with saline. He then argues that if one looks at the history of all the childhood illnesses that vaccines target, they were almost all nearly eradicated before the introduction of the vaccine. He claims that the impression vaccines stop childhood illnesses is not true; almost all illnesses had reduced to extremely low levels due to sanitation and hygiene, development, and some antibiotics. Regarding the vaccines themselves, he states that the true data and history of these vaccines are “really horrible.” He mentions a history of lack of safety and relates it to sudden infant death syndrome, asserting that it “suddenly came out of nowhere as we suspended the schedule” and asks when death occurs. He asserts that sudden infant death syndrome is reproducible in that it occurs at two months, four months, and six months, and that most of those deaths occur within days to a couple of weeks of the vaccine. He concludes with a strong personal stance: if he had his young children today, he would not give them a single vaccine.

Speaker 1 states they would not give their children the measles, mumps vaccine, claiming that while many used to die from these diseases, by 1964, only 300-400 Americans died, mostly malnourished children. They claim the World Health Organization says vitamin A is a cure for measles and that contracting measles as a child leads to greater resistance to cancers, atopic diseases, allergies, and heart disease. Speaker 1 denies causing a measles outbreak in Samoa, stating the prime minister had already banned the vaccine after deaths, and that the deaths were due to a bad vaccine from Australia given to people who already had measles. They maintain that autism is caused by vaccines, citing a CDC study that showed a 1350% elevated risk for autism among children who received the hepatitis B vaccine in their first 30 days. They allege that studies claiming vaccines don't cause autism are fraudulent, citing a fugitive scientist, Paul Thornson, and that the CDC is dishonest and controlled by the pharmaceutical industry. They reference their book, "Let the Science Speak," which they claim contains 1,400 references and over 400 studies linking autism and neurological injuries to vaccines.

Speaker 0 asserts that there is no safe vaccine on the childhood schedule and labels themselves an anti-vaxxer because no vaccine has been properly tested for safety. They state that, in the book Vax Facts, you are more likely to die from the vaccine than from the disease for which there is a vaccine, and that this is true for every single vaccine on the childhood schedule. They acknowledge that death from the vaccine is still a death and “super rare,” but claim you are much more likely to die from the vaccine. They ask which do you want: a greater chance of dying from the vaccine or a lesser chance of dying from the disease, noting that for many of these diseases, the risk is zero.

In recent years, global mortality rates have been lower compared to the past 50 years, with a spike in 2018 due to new vaccines. Despite claims of a deadly pandemic, mortality rates have remained lower than in 1952. People were getting sick, but not dying at alarming rates. This raises questions about the severity of the pandemic.

The speaker published a book, "Vax Facts," as an update to their 2016 book because they didn't have the full picture then. The book covers preconception, pregnancy, infancy, and adulthood, addressing every vaccine on the childhood schedule. For each vaccine, the book discusses worrisome ingredients, pros, cons, risks, and potential benefits. It also includes a common-sense approach, considering the prevalence of diseases like Hepatitis B in newborns. According to the speaker, for every vaccine on the childhood immunization schedule, one is more likely to die from the vaccine than from the disease.

Between 1900 and the introduction of the measles vaccine in 1963, the measles mortality rate in America declined by over 98%. This decline had nothing to do with vaccines because there was no measles vaccine at the time. Public health authorities should take credit for this due to improved nutrition, sanitation, clean water, and quarantine practices. In the years before the vaccine, around 400 Americans a year died of measles, which was one in 500,000 Americans. The mortality rate was already declining when the measles vaccine was introduced in 1963. It can be debated how much of the further decline is attributable to the vaccine versus continued public health efforts. Public health authorities today claim the measles vaccine caused the decline in mortality, without mentioning the other factors.

The speaker discusses polio and vaccines by tracing how the disease is perceived versus the data. Polio is described as “the worst disease in world history, not actually, but that's the spin,” and similarly framed as “completely eliminated by mass vaccination, not actually, but that's the spin.” Looking at polio globally, with eight billion people on Earth, the speaker asks how many people died last year from polio, answering “Zero.” The number who had paralysis from polio is stated as “Five hundred and sixty, and ninety seven percent of them was vaccine strain or vaccine induced poliomyelitis.” The speaker notes that opponents claim this is due to vaccination, but then raises the question of how that accounts for more than a billion people on Earth who never had the polio vaccine, asserting they have the exact same death rate. The argument is extended to measles, with the claim that the death rate is the same whether or not one is vaccinated, and similarly for other diseases. The speaker emphasizes a specific approach used in a book: “the only way to do it, I think, compare the product, are they all the same? The diseases, are they all the same?” This leads to the central question of how to handle risk for one’s children. A quick final point compares vaccine decisions to everyday risk decisions. Parents weigh disease risk and vaccine risk when deciding whether their kids should engage in activities such as football, which could involve a head injury; riding a bicycle at night, which could lead to injury; or sleeping over at someone’s house. The speaker argues that all of these are risk decisions quite similar to the vaccine and disease decision because you have to weigh the disease and weigh the vaccine. Yet, the speaker notes, there has never been a mandate for football, and there has never been a mandate that children not ride bikes at night in their neighborhood, or that they not sleep over at someone’s house if they don’t feel good about it in their particular neighborhood.

The speaker discusses all-cause mortality and presents data from various countries, including France, the USA, and Romania. They highlight the seasonal pattern of mortality, with higher deaths in the winter and lower deaths in the summer. The speaker questions the understanding of this pattern and argues that it is not fully comprehended. They also analyze historical events such as the Spanish flu, the Great Depression, and wars, showing their impact on mortality rates. The speaker then focuses on the COVID-19 pandemic, discussing the effects of aggressive medical treatments, socioeconomic factors, and vaccines on mortality. They present data suggesting that vaccines may have caused excess deaths, particularly among the elderly.

The speaker claims that the vaccine is toxic and could have caused the deaths of 17 million people worldwide. They argue that after each vaccine rollout, there is a temporary increase in overall mortality. This pattern is observed consistently across countries with sufficient data. Another speaker points out that typically, deaths decrease in the summer and increase in the winter, but during the COVID vaccine campaign, there are spikes in mortality right after the campaigns, even in the summer. They mention that this pattern is seen in both the northern and southern hemispheres. The speakers emphasize that this is a new phenomenon.

Three papers by Nathaniel Mead, containing nearly a thousand references, concluded that COVID-19 vaccination risks outweigh any theoretical benefits. According to the speaker, wishful thinking suggests vaccines saved lives and reduced severity, but early multi-drug treatment, not vaccines, reduced the risk of death. The speaker claims a marathon runner died because he didn't receive effective early treatment, and his vaccination status was irrelevant. The CDC allegedly knew that thousands of fully vaccinated patients were dying of acute COVID-19 early in 2021, making it obvious the vaccines did not reduce the risk of death. The speaker does not want America to be fooled into thinking that the vaccines save lives because they didn't.

Speaker 0 asserts that the era of vaccines is over. Vaccinating has been done since the seventeen hundreds, back when bloodletting was state of the art medicine. They didn’t even have a theory of viruses and bacteria back then; they just had crude practices. That technology has failed. It has been revealed to cause catastrophic harms in the population. The treatment for bacteria is antibiotics, and the treatment for viruses should be antivirals. Vaccines have no place in medicine going forward. That’s where we’re gonna get to. That’s what the data actually show us right now. It’s just gonna be a lot of hard fighting between now and arriving at what the data is already showing us right now.

Lifespan improvement is attributed to medical interventions, but medicine only contributes about 3.5% through antibiotics, vaccines, etc. The rest stems from the health revolution: clean water, shelter, electricity, and child labor laws ending. The "magic of medicine" is overstated. The medical field has value in surgery and certain drugs, especially for organ failure. The speaker's Hippocratic Oath involves consulting any helpful consultant and prioritizing the patient's well-being, including using the most benign therapies first. Therapies that align with the body's blueprint and the theory of health, rather than just fighting disease, yield better results, assuming there's time.

"Only half the children in the country got that vaccine, and the other half didn't." "no routine vaccine was tested for overall effect on mortality in randomized trials before being introduced." "The program we are talking about at this time, the vaccine program, was introduced sort of in the late seventies after the success with the eradication of smallpox." "When you come out here, you had two point three times higher mortality if you were DTP vaccinated." "So the moving cough vaccine or the pertussis vaccine was associated with two fold higher mortality." "You can have a vaccine which is fully protected against a specific disease, but associated with higher mortality." "Once they looked at it, they were dying at 5x the rate of all of these other issues."

The speaker argues that the vaccine program should stop and that injecting foreign matter into babies cannot be considered an improvement to their health. They reference Peter McCullough as someone who said the program needs to halt. They criticize the expansion of vaccine policy since the 1986 Act, which granted liability protection for the trio of vaccines (MMR, DPT, and polio) at the time, and suggest there was no foresight about expanding to multiple doses of many vaccines for little babies. Now that this has happened, they insist it must end. They point to polio as an example, noting that children still receive four polio vaccines even though polio has not appeared in the Western Hemisphere since 1991, and that the World Health Organization declared the region polio-free in 1994. They question why four doses of polio vaccines, which contain monkey kidney cells and formaldehyde, are given for a disease the region is no longer exposed to. They ask, “Why? To protect against what? That’s not even here.” They extend the argument to “the same thing” with other vaccines. The speaker asserts that measles has not been deadly since 1963 and explains that the measles virus has a life cycle in which an outbreak occurs roughly every four years regardless of vaccination rates. They make a similar claim about pertussis. They argue that injecting foreign matter into children does not improve their health and is not preventing deadly diseases that are now treated with antibiotics, steroids, inhalers, and other therapies. They point out that it is not a big deal to have multiple tetanus shots and still contract tetanus, using this as evidence about the effectiveness of tetanus vaccination. Overall, the speaker contends that the concept of deadly diseases being eradicated by vaccines is a multi-generational myth and that vaccines are not reliably protective. They argue that the practice has run its course and that it is overdue for the entire vaccine program to end, suggesting that it did its job and should now be discontinued. The concluding stance is that the multi-generational myth of deadly diseases and the safety and protection of vaccines should stop, and that the program should be ended.

The speaker claims the risk of death from whooping cough is less than one in 2.3 million, while the risk of death from the vaccine is greater than one in 76,000. They state the vaccine is killing far more children than the disease itself, estimating potentially 20 to 40 times more deaths from the vaccine. Another speaker emphasizes that any vaccine, specifically DTaP, carries the risk of death for a child.

Speaker 0 asserts that the MMR and MMR V vaccines have been linked to two thousand six hundred percent more deaths than measles infection since 1995. The speaker claims that, over the past thirty years, the MMR shots have killed far more children than measles, identifying hundreds of infants and toddlers who died after these shots, often from SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome, cardiac arrest, seizures, and encephalitis. The speaker states that most of these deaths occurred within about two weeks after the shot, with forty percent dying within one week. The deaths are described as temporally linked to the vaccination, with the majority of fatalities occurring at ages one to one and a half, which the speaker notes as the time they receive the MMR shots. The speaker claims that twenty-five percent of these deaths were classified as sudden infant death syndrome. The overall claim is that these shots are killing the babies in their sleep, described as absolutely disturbing and as part of a broader study. The speaker concludes that the shots are deadly and that the MMR and MMRV shots should not be given anymore; if parents still want them, they should be split up rather than administered as a combined dose, labeling the current approach as “the full load of garbage.”

The speaker claims the DTP vaccine, diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis, caused brain injuries or death to 1 in every 300 children in the US, leading to its ban and the Vaccine Act. While the US and Europe don't use it, 161 million African children receive it annually. Bill Gates claimed the DTP vaccine saved 30 million lives, but the Danish government investigated and found girls who received the DTP vaccine died at 10 times the rate of unvaccinated girls. They were dying of anemia, malaria, heart failure, pulmonary disease, respiratory disease, and pneumonia. The speaker alleges the vaccine ruined their immune systems, making them unable to defend against minor diseases.