TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Out of the 100,000 Canadian doctors, almost all of them have been vaccinated. However, there have been cases of sudden deaths among doctors, mostly due to cardiac issues, blood clots, and aggressive cancers. These cancers, referred to as "turbo cancer" on social media, are extremely aggressive and present at stage 4, leading to death within months. This phenomenon is unlike anything seen before, with young individuals developing rare brain cancers, stage 4 breast and colon cancers in their twenties and thirties, and rapidly progressing leukemias and lymphomas. The severity and nature of these cancers are unprecedented, according to a doctor who has diagnosed over 20,000 cancer patients in their career.

80% of doctors are believed to have lost their minds. An anecdote was shared about a doctor who died shortly after receiving an mRNA gene therapy shot. Another similar incident was mentioned. The speaker emphasized the importance of listening to real stories to understand what is happening.

The speaker claims to have witnessed a humanitarian catastrophe with millions of deaths worldwide due to vaccines. In their private practice, they've seen almost 1500 patients, previously healthy, now disabled and suffering years later, believing they are addressing the greatest unmet need in the country: care for the vaccine-injured. The speaker believes the government has been fully captured by corporations and industrial complexes. They allege that agencies like the CDC, FDA, NIH, and EPA, along with big food, are polluting air, water, and medicines. They also claim the government is allowing immigrants in, surveilling and censoring citizens, and stripping away rights, with most of the country unaware. The speaker states their goal is to educate people about this and "rescue the republic."

The speaker urges their colleagues in the medical field to do the right thing and speak out against the problems they have observed with the COVID-19 vaccines. They share examples of adverse reactions they have witnessed, including strokes, cancer in fully vaccinated individuals, heart problems, blood clots, and fertility issues. The speaker emphasizes the need for more doctors to join the movement and speak up, despite the potential consequences. They highlight the importance of using facts and clinical experience to support their claims. The speaker concludes by encouraging others to continue fighting for the truth and not retire, as they are backed by evidence and personal experiences.

Doctors are a key part of a sinister plan to control people through implanting chips, psychotronic vaccines, DNA alteration, cancer-causing vaccines, and mind control. Medicine is claimed to be more corrupt than politics, with doctors administering harmful drugs to the elderly population.

Speaker 0: The movement in medicine, I you know, you talked about, you know, everything going digital in terms of the financial system, the tokenization, the digital currency, and all of that. Something similar is going to be happening to medicine very soon. What we're seeing is we're seeing thousands of doctors getting sick. They're getting sick from the shots. They're having heart issues. You know, they're having heart attacks, strokes, blood clots. They're having cancer. They're getting turbo cancers because ninety nine percent of doctors took the shots. They took at least two shots, and there's some doctors still boasting on Twitter that they're taking the latest booster shots. I mean, we had president Trump saying he got the latest COVID booster shot too, so that doesn't help the situation either. But the doctors went full in on the they went full in on the COVID vaccine fraud. They went full in. Ninety nine percent of them are vaccinated. I'm seeing actually many of them are coming to me. Now they're coming quietly. They don't want anyone to know that they've been vaccine injured, that they're developing aggressive cancers. They're coming to me. They're asking for help. They want, they want ivermectin. They want mebendazole, fendbendazole. And I what I'm seeing is a lot of doctors are going to be dropping out of health care due to health issues. Doctors are retiring early. They're closing their practices in their forties. You know, in the past, doctors used to work into their seventies. Now they're retiring in their forties because of heart attacks, strokes, and cancer. And you know what's going to replace them? It's not going to be doctors from overseas or new medical students. It's gonna be AI. That's that's where I see this happening in the next within the next five years, we're gonna see AI creeping into medicine as well.

The speaker describes unbridled enthusiasm and irrational exuberance for life as sacrificing safety. They state they presented autopsy work on death after COVID-19 vaccination at the American Society of Microbiology, where thousands of microbiologists, vaccinologists, and immunologists attended. As people visited, the speaker was stunned by what they call scientific seduction by messenger RNA technology. They predict a cataclysmic recognition that mRNA platforms are unsafe, claiming there is no way to break down pseudourrogenated messenger RNA. The speaker asserts that circulating messenger RNA from Pfizer or Moderna remains in patients’ bloodstream three years after the shots, described as intact.

They argue that centralization—big pharma, the FCC, and other captured agencies—drives a problem that includes tech giants like Motorola, Nokia, Apple, Meta, and Google. They claim that programs government-sponsored at Tulane Neurosurgery and Neurology, known as MK Ultra, taught that people could be controlled through light waves. They describe a progression from cutting monkeys’ heads and wiring their heads to study behavior to the claim that we are controlled by light waves, not just by light in our environment. They point out that blue light is used by Dell, Apple, Meta, Google, and others on screens, and question why efflux or iris isn’t preloaded, suggesting the reason is that blue light lowers dopamine and melatonin, making people addicted. They attribute the discovery of this effect to the mafia rather than the CIA, linking it to the Las Vegas model: a desert city with great light and casinos that used blue light and alcohol to lower patrons’ dopamine so they would spend more money. They claim the CIA then redirected researchers to explore how to control without wires, moving from direct brain wires to semiconductors and LEDs through light. They recount that silicon valley developments with semiconductors produced LEDs, and that the early work included Delgado, a PhD researcher who implanted wires in a bull’s head to stop the animal via remote control, demonstrating a transition to wireless control. They assert that the next step was to eliminate wires and implant microchips in the brain, akin to Neuralink, enabling electrical, photoelectrical, and wireless control. They claim that researchers discovered that light could be used to control mammals, and that Meta and Google codified this through patents for blue light technology used in screens, owning the patents via patent attorneys. They reference Maria Manoulas in Los Angeles and her circle of friends connected to screens, asking whether these tools have been used to influence people and situations around them. They argue digital babysitting is successful for parents because a child becomes easier to control with screens, comparing this to a heroin addict needing a fix, explaining that exposure to electromagnetic pollution reduces beta endorphin (the natural brain opiate) and drives a need for external dopamine from drugs, alcohol, sex, or food. They claim this entire line of research originated in covert work at institutions such as Tulane, Johns Hopkins, Mayo Clinic, and Harvard, then moved into big tech. They explain the transition from old CRT screens to blue-lit modern screens, noting that those who own the patents control the algorithms and centralize medicine for profit. They suggest a cynical view of doctors: their burnout is tied to blue-lit electronic medical records like Epic, Cerner, and Meditech, which require data input rather than patient interaction. They ask who that serves and imply it harms both patients and doctors. They challenge the idea that technology saves money, asserting instead that it increases data collection and profit through big data. They warn that AI will be used to train computers to replace dermatologists, predicting that in twenty years people will visit Walgreens and consult AI-generated, Google-algorithm-created centralized medicine. They name Maria Manoulas and her circle as part of this ecosystem.

Speaker 0 outlines a surge of severe health problems following what they call “the stabby jabby,” noting that after that point there were increases in heart issues, kidney issues, and diabetes problems. They observe that even patients without diabetes saw a 75 percent increase in diabetes in 2022, and that among patients with diabetes who contracted Shmovid, their diabetes “is no longer under control anymore. They're on two and three different medications.” They describe this as just the beginning. The speaker emphasizes that heart issues are “out of control,” with a high volume of heart consults and a shift to placing community veterans into the community due to a shortage of cardiologists. They claim there aren’t enough heart monitors available to meet demand. They reference “TurboCancers” and add that kidney issues were occurring “up the wazoo” after 2022. They report a rise in pneumonia cases in the last four months, including a veteran who had been on nine medications for pneumonia with no resolution. They state the flu cases are persistent and that skin issues are “mind blowing,” including bleeding in the eye and at the back of the retina, as well as a surge in strokes “through the roof,” including strokes in the eyes and in the brain, plus embolisms and pulmonary embolisms. The speaker describes hospital conditions in the Portland Metro Area as astonishing, noting personal fear that leads to avoiding restrooms due to concerns about exposure, and mentions being among “three people who didn’t get it” out of a hospital of many staff. They characterize the situation as terrifying. They describe skin wounds and sores that resist debridement, packing, or wrapping, remaining visibly the same after weeks. They conclude that people are dying at an extraordinary rate and reflect on sixteen years in their position, saying they have “never seen people die like this ever.” Finally, the speaker anticipates the long-term implications: all the people who have gotten it will require care, housing, and coordination for care, and questions who will manage this given many medical staff having contracted the illness themselves. They wrap up with a personal warning and a closing remark: “Hope that helps.”

The speaker claims the medical landscape is dominated by COVID vaccine injuries, disabilities, and deaths, and that they submit multiple entries daily to VAERS, facing scrutiny and potential penalties for falsification. They state they diagnosed an executive in her late thirties with Guillain Barre syndrome from COVID-19 vaccination. The speaker estimates that only 1% of manuscripts on COVID vaccine injuries are being published, suggesting a tremendous bias, and that there are about 4,000 papers on the vaccine debacle, which is about 1% of reality. They claim to have never seen myocarditis, heart failure, or blood clots from eating frosted flakes, but are seeing people devastated by the shots. The speaker advocates for removing COVID-19 vaccines from the market, a critical reevaluation of the vaccine schedule, dropping all vaccine mandates, and rescinding the 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act.

The speaker suggests that pharmaceutical companies want people to continuously take vaccines, even as they become sicker. They claim that these companies also acquire drugs to treat the injuries caused by the vaccines. For example, before rolling out COVID-19 vaccines for children, one of the companies acquired drugs to treat blood clots in children, which they believe the vaccines may cause. The speaker also mentions a large acquisition by Pfizer for novel cancer treatments, implying that they will cause the cancers they treat. The speaker concludes that pharmaceutical companies want people to be sick and dependent on their medications.

The majority of Canadian doctors are vaccinated, with some experiencing sudden deaths from heart issues, blood clots, strokes, and aggressive cancers. These cancers, dubbed "turbo cancer" on social media, are unusually fast-growing and deadly, affecting young individuals in their twenties and thirties. The rapid progression and severity of these cancers are unlike anything previously seen by the speaker, who has diagnosed over 20,000 cancer patients in their career.

The speaker argues that an irrational, unbridled enthusiasm for new possibilities leads to a sacrifice of safety. This enthusiasm, in their view, has adversely affected precautionary considerations and risk assessment. They reference presenting autopsy findings related to deaths following COVID-19 vaccination at the American Society of Microbiology, an event attended by thousands of microbiologists, vaccinologists, and immunologists. In conversations with attendees, the speaker was surprised by what they describe as a scientific seduction surrounding messenger RNA technology. The core concern expressed is that this eagerness to embrace mRNA platforms is accompanied by a neglect of safety considerations. The speaker asserts that there will be a cataclysmic recognition that messenger RNA technology represents an unsafe platform. They emphasize that, as they understand it, there is no way to break down certain aspects of the technology they refer to as “pseudourogenated messenger RNA,” noting this within the context of their work in research laboratories. The statement implies a belief that the degradation or metabolic processing of this form of RNA poses unresolved issues. A central, striking claim presented is that circulating messenger RNA from Pfizer or Moderna has been found in their patients’ bloodstream three years after vaccination, and that this RNA is intact. The speaker underscores this as evidence tied to their observations and research experiences, asserting the persistence of the RNA in the circulatory system over an extended period. Overall, the message conveys a perspective that rapid adoption and optimism around mRNA vaccines and technologies have overshadowed safety considerations, and it anticipates a future realization of safety concerns associated with these platforms. The speaker ties their warnings to concrete experiences at a major scientific conference and to specific, long-term biomarkers observed in patients, presenting a narrative of ongoing research findings and anticipated paradigm shifts in how the safety of mRNA vaccines is perceived.

The speaker asserts that COVID-19 shots do more than affect the immune system; they can damage the brain and worsen mental health. They claim a wave of studies shows sharp increases in various strokes: ischemic strokes up to 44%, hemorrhagic strokes up to 50%, and transient ischemic attacks (mini strokes) up to 67%. They also report increases in neurological and autoimmune conditions, including myasthenia gravis up 71% and Alzheimer’s disease up 22%. Cognitive impairment is claimed to have risen by nearly 138%, while depression is up 68%, anxiety disorders up 44%, and sleep disorders up 93%. The speaker links all of these increases to “toxic spike protein accumulation and persistence in the brain.” The speaker states this is not a conspiracy theory and cites what they describe as documented peer‑reviewed research and studies by experts. They name epidemiologist Nicholas Holcher, who allegedly says that using mRNA to hijack cells in various organ systems to produce a highly toxic spike protein that persists in the body for months or years was “one of the worst ideas in medical history.” The speaker then asks, “So what can you do?” as a transition to presumably recommendations or actions, though no specific actions are listed in the provided segment.

A small percentage of Canadian doctors, around 99.9%, are vaccinated, yet there has been a concerning rise in sudden deaths among them, primarily due to cardiac issues like heart attacks and blood clots. Additionally, an alarming number of doctors are developing aggressive cancers at unusually young ages, such as stage 4 gastric cancer in their thirties and rare brain cancers in their twenties and thirties. This phenomenon, referred to as "turbo cancer" on social media, is characterized by its rapid progression and severity, with many cases presenting at stage 4 and leading to death within months. Such aggressive cancers are unlike anything previously encountered in a medical career, with instances of stage 4 cancers appearing in young individuals and leukemias that can be fatal within days.

Big Tech, Big Pharma, and Big Finance are all involved in promising that data will improve our healthcare, making it more convenient, affordable, and keeping us healthier. However, global organizations and governments are also entering this space. The future of healthcare lies in the digitalization of the system, which is essential as our healthcare systems will eventually collapse without it. It's remarkable how similar the messages from politics, business, science, and media are. Is this really just about our health, or could there be other interests at play?

After the "stabby jabbies," there were increases in heart issues, kidney issues, and diabetes issues. New diabetes cases went up 75% in 2022, and existing cases became harder to control. Heart issues are out of control, with insufficient specialists and monitors. There are also turbo cancers and kidney issues. Recently, patients are experiencing pneumonia that is difficult to resolve, along with mind-blowing skin issues, bleeding in the eye, and increased strokes, embolisms, and pulmonary embolisms. Skin sores and wounds don't heal, and people are dying at an unprecedented rate. The speaker has never seen this level of mortality in 16 years. A major concern is caring for all the people who have received the "jabbies," especially since many medical professionals have also received them.

The speaker outlines a version of the biological colonialism argument, referencing Jeffrey. The argument traces five hundred years of wealth accumulation by powerful nations: European ships with soldiers and guns arrive in the New World, take gold, enslave people, force labor in gold mines, and thereby make Europe and the UK rich. This pattern continues through neo-colonialism with unfair trade deals and, more recently, with the backing of the US military to compel third-world nations to produce goods for low cost, sustaining Western wealth. The speaker asserts that when there were no new lands left to conquer, the ruling class redirected exploitation toward the middle class in the United States and developed nations, extracting wealth through iatrogenic injury. According to the speaker, this modern form of exploitation involves the entire population injecting their children 72 times during childhood and encouraging further COVID shots for others, resulting in lifelong injury. The speaker claims that autism and other chronic illnesses generate substantial lifetime care costs, estimated at 5,000,000 to 7,000,000 dollars per child, with these costs benefiting the pharmaceutical industry, the hospital-industrial complex, and the ruling class. A concrete example is given: a middle-aged woman in Orange County, California who receives a COVID shot and develops myocarditis. Over the next five to ten years, her healthcare costs are projected to reach about 2,000,000 dollars, paid by insurance, government programs, and her family, circulating to pharma and doctors. The speaker contrasts this with the older colonial model of extracting wealth from a laborer in a gold mine, where at most about 20,000 dollars of labor could be harvested from a person. In the current model, the speaker argues that the same person could be drained of approximately 2,000,000 dollars through iatrogenic injury and healthcare costs over a decade, ultimately culminating in the person’s death. The core claim is that Western allopathic medicine has become a machine to extract wealth from the middle, working, and lower classes in the United States, enriching the pharmaceutical industry and the ruling class through iatrogenic injury. The speaker states that this crisis was already present with autism and other chronic illnesses before the COVID era but expanded in scale during the COVID epidemic, the response to it, and what they describe as junk science surrounding COVID shots.

The speaker states they are still being persecuted for raising concerns about harm from vaccines. They testified at the National Citizens Inquiry in Edmonton about vaccinated kids now getting cancer, which they believe will be denied for years despite seeing it in their patients. They claim to have discussed the "died suddenly" phenomenon and "turbo cancer" – aggressive cancers developing after COVID-19 vaccines – for two years, resulting in being banned from Twitter. The speaker says they have shifted focus to solutions and treating vaccine injuries, as the destructiveness of the "jabs" is now widely understood, with many knowing someone who has experienced heart attacks, strokes, blood clots, autoimmune diseases, neurological issues, or cancer. They claim there has been a huge explosion of cancer, and they are currently running the largest ivermectin cancer clinic in the world with over a thousand patients.

The speaker discusses a review of 325 autopsies, which they claim is the largest autopsy series in the world, of COVID-19 vaccinated individuals who died shortly after vaccination. According to the speaker, this review found that the vaccine caused or contributed to approximately 74% of the sudden deaths. The speaker states that this information will be published in a peer-reviewed paper. The speaker anticipates a "tsunami of evidence" regarding the harm caused by COVID-19 vaccines to children, pregnant women, and adults. The speaker urges politicians to "get ahead of this" issue now.

Speaker 1 notes that ivermectin has broken through to the public sphere beyond COVID and is now discussed for many diseases. Speaker 0 asks where ivermectin stands in the scientific and medical community today and what other use cases exist for the medicine. Speaker 1 responds that thousands of doctors follow their data; 18,000 GI doctors see their data when they publish or present at the American College of Gastroenterology. Word-of-mouth in the medical community is a major form of marketing, with one doctor speaking to another. Referencing the COVID era, Speaker 1 mentions corruption and retractions, then describes ivermectin as having created a healthcare revolution where doctors have lined up to work to see other benefits of ivermectin without needing to ask permission to treat patients. A whole branch of healthcare is moving away from the same institute that Speaker 1 helped create drugs to market with his sisters. He says a group of doctors who had sponsored or helped pharma are turning away from pharma and exploring other methods to treat patients. He states his job is to unite doctors to see the truth, while bringing pharma back to being righteous and stopping data manipulation and scientist censorship. Speaker 1 references his book, Let’s Talk SH.T, acknowledging he could be wrong and challenging others to prove him wrong and reproduce the data to retract the hypothesis or paper. He emphasizes that the scientific process should be followed, especially when everything was done by the book and as well as he could. He adds that the research was not funded by others; it was funded by his savings. He created the microbiome research foundation with the goal of raising money to study kids with autism and to push an IND to the FDA, which cost about $600,000 to obtain FDA approval. He clarifies that no external party paid for this work, and he continues to struggle to raise funds to treat poor autistic kids who cannot afford expensive stool testing, drugs, and vitamins; they need help and everyone should step in to assist these kids. Speaker 1 concludes that their focus is fixing autism, with the aim of later addressing Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, and cancer.

The speaker finds it difficult to find someone who hasn't been damaged by the vaccine, and even senior consultant colleagues haven't connected their ailments to the vaccine. The speaker claims the vaccine causes autoimmune diseases, of which there are 131 types, all reportedly linked to the vaccine. Individually, these appear as coincidences, but collectively, a high percentage of vaccinated people suffer from one or more autoimmune conditions. The speaker is annoyed by their GP practice constantly pushing boosters, even knowing their views, suggesting they are incentivized by payment. The speaker believes that if the practice adhered to "first do no harm," they would refuse to administer the vaccines.

Traveling the country, the speaker has heard anecdotes from physicians about unusual cancer cases following the rollout of boosters. In Florida, one physician reported seeing five kidney cancers in young patients in one month, whereas they usually see one per decade. A chief of oncology reported seeing five astrocytoma brain cancers in young patients after the booster rollout, when they usually see one per year. Another physician reported their 21-year-old son developed salivary gland cancer after getting a booster. The speaker claims these are not normal cancers, and they've heard of patients with stable cancer or who have been cancer-free for years developing stage four disease after getting vaccinated. Doctors in France and the UK have allegedly confirmed similar observations, and a family doctor from Ireland reported seeing the "weirdest cancers" after the shot rollout. The speaker concludes that these anecdotes suggest something is wrong.

According to the speaker, 50% of pediatricians' revenue comes from vaccines, with insurance companies like Blue Cross offering bonuses for high vaccination rates, potentially influencing doctors' recommendations. The speaker claims that pediatricians may dismiss families who want alternative vaccine schedules to protect these bonuses. The speaker alleges that 80% of doctors now work for corporations focused on revenue over patient care, creating pressure to generate funds due to medical school debt. The speaker suggests the entire system is incentivized to keep people sick, not necessarily deliberately, but through financial incentives. Insurance companies allegedly profit more from a sick population because they collect money as friction, taking a cut of revenues. The speaker claims that doctors, hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies also benefit financially from people being sick, creating systemic pressure regardless of individual intentions.