reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims that our history is a lie and introduces the concept of the Tartarians, an advanced race of people who built impressive structures. They argue that these buildings have been falsely attributed to other architectural styles, and the true history behind them has been hidden. The speaker suggests that a powerful organization opposed Tartaria because their free energy technology threatened their control. This organization supposedly destroyed Tartaria and erased their existence from history. However, the speaker believes there is still evidence of Tartaria's existence in the form of these buildings.

Speaker asserts that European Jews, 92% of the world Jewish population, were originally Khazar, a warlike tribe that lived in Asia and were driven into Europe. To simplify history, they allegedly formed the Khazar Kingdom—800,000 square miles—with no Russia or other countries, the biggest kingdom in Europe. When monarchs wanted to war, the cow gods would loan them 40,000 soldiers. They were phallic worshipers. The king supposedly adopted a monotheistic faith—Christianity, Islam, or Judaism (really communism). By spinning a top, he picked Judaism, and sent to the Talmudic schools of and Surah, bringing up thousands of rabbis, opening synagogues and schools in a kingdom of 800,000 people, 800,000 square miles, and maybe 10 to 20,000,000 people, becoming what we call Jews. There wasn't one of them that ever had an ancestor that ever put a toll in the holy land, not alone in Old Testament history, but that's the

The speaker questions why the government hides the history of the Tartarian Empire, a civilization that existed 100 years ago. They claim that Tartaria was technologically advanced, converting atmospheric pressure into electricity and promoting unity, peace, and love. Despite being omitted from history books, Tartaria had its own government, flag, and territory spanning over 3,000,000 square miles. The speaker suggests that the Tartarians may have built the Great Wall of China, but this is disputed by mainstream history. They believe that a world government destroyed this utopia to prevent people from realizing that collective sustainability is possible without the interference of heads of state.

Speaker 0 presents a case that Tartaria, a civilization often said to predate our current history, is connected to the region we know today as Tatarstan, Russia. He notes that Tartaria is depicted on premodern maps and claims education systems worldwide have silenced this location. He focuses on Tatarstan (Tataria) within Russia, highlighting their Griffin seal as a symbol associated with Tartaria. He traces the historical seals of Tatarstan—from a 1672 seal through an 1856 version—to a 1920 seal featuring hammers and chisels, describing it as part of a “takeover worldwide.” The video then shifts to an on-site tour of Kazan, the capital of the Republic of Tatarstan, where he shows what he interprets as remnants of the old world. He points to old brickwork and deeply buried houses that appear to be repurposed or overbuilt, suggesting that people today occupy structures from a previous civilization. He indicates a single road filled with such evidence and moves to the Nicholas Cathedral in Kazan, arguing that a wooden church stood there in 1565 and that the current temple was built in the mid-17th century. He questions how exact dating of the wooden church could be known while the date of the present church is not, labeling the narrative as “nonsense” and accusing it of being a constructed history. Further into the tour, he discusses Saint Peter and Paul Cathedral in Kazan, recounting a story about an emperor’s 50th birthday and a three-day feast, followed by a collapse of the cathedral and subsequent reconstruction by czarist craftsmen. He notes multiple fires in the cathedral’s history and argues that the standard narratives are AI-generated templates—“the basic things” fed into an AI produce a consistent pattern: a four-year construction, a disaster, a rebuild, and a return to beauty. He imitates this storytelling pattern to illustrate how widely recycled historical narratives are, suggesting they obscure the truth about grand structures built by a prior civilization. The discussion broadens to Kazan’s architectural landscape, labeling the Kazan Kremlin as a fortified citadel with museums and sacred sites, insisting it represents “griffin central” and that the tower’s date of construction is “enveloped in mystery.” He claims the tower once topped by a griffin or double-headed eagle was replaced by the modern state, and he points to the Epiphany Tower and other palatial buildings, asserting that many are interconnected through underground tunnels. He asserts the prevalence of bells and mocks the absence of dragons or griffins in official art, arguing these depictions reflect a hidden past. The video continues with a claim that modern towns, such as Bulgar (population 8,000 in 2010), display new palaces amid stagnant or regressing living conditions, reinforcing the idea that Tartaria remains hidden in plain sight. He situates Kazan as a potential central base for Tartaria and invites viewer feedback on exploring more locations in the region. He ends by asking viewers to notice a Tartarian logo on a gas station and teases continued coverage in upcoming episodes, acknowledging Patreon supporters and channel sponsors.

Tartaria, a location missing from our education, is actually modern-day Russia. Within Russia, there's Tatarstan, possibly a remnant of Tartaria. Their historical coat of arms featured a griffin, but was replaced in 1920, signaling the removal of the old world. In Tatarstan, we see repurposed old-world structures, with windows near ground level, suggesting they're buried in mud. The Nicholas Cathedral has a questionable historical narrative, knowing the exact date of a wooden church that no longer exists, but not the current cathedral's construction date. The Saint Peter And Paul Cathedral shares a similar, likely AI-generated narrative of construction, destruction, and miraculous recovery. Kazan, in Tatarstan, may be the central base of Tartaria. The Kazan Kremlin contains museums and sacred sites. The Khan's Mosque tower's origins are mysterious. Even the headquarters of "Donkeys Incorporated" reflects the old world's grandeur. The existence of palaces in towns with small populations raises questions about who built them.

Ukraine is seen as not sovereign, still part of Russia. The CIA has been active in Ukraine for 70 years to bring down the Soviet Union and access resources. There's talk of a new world order, with a focus on Ukraine's history as the Khazar Empire. The Khazars were known for their brutality and pagan practices, and eventually fell to Russian conquests. The Khazars, now known as Ashkenazi Jews, have a dark history of child sacrifice and blood rituals. They seek revenge against Russia and other nations that drove them out of power.

The speaker discusses the origins of the Jewish population, claiming that the majority are descendants of the Khazars, a warlike tribe from Eastern Europe. They explain how the Khazars adopted Judaism as their religion and spread it throughout their kingdom. Another speaker talks about the Greater Israel Plan, which aims to make Israel the dominant power in the region by dividing neighboring countries into smaller states. They mention the Nile and Euphrates rivers as part of this plan. The speakers also suggest that the Khazars have infiltrated various religions and are using supremacist ideologies to create a new world order. They criticize the actions of leaders like Sisi and Assad, and question the true motives behind groups like ISIS.

There is a document from the CIA discussing Tartaria in Soviet Russia, revealing a directive to falsify Tartar history to hide the truth about Tartar-Russian relations. This challenges mainstream historical narratives, suggesting a more advanced empire existed. The video questions the Smithsonian's portrayal of Native Americans as isolated and unintelligent. This prompts reflection on the manipulation of history to fit certain narratives.

The speaker discusses the historical relationship between Russia and Ukraine, emphasizing that the majority of people in both countries considered them to be essentially the same. However, after World War II, nationalist and Nazi elements fled to the United States and Canada, and eventually came to power in Ukraine after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The speaker argues that these individuals were aggressive and aligned with fascist ideologies. They were later persecuted by the Germans not because they changed their views, but because they realized Germany was losing the war. The speaker concludes that these individuals remained Nazis and later became neo-Nazis.

Ukraine is allegedly not a sovereign state with internationally recognized borders, but still part of Russia since the tenth century. Ukraine has been the center of globalists, with the CIA allegedly working there for decades to build resistance and exploit resources. A new world order is emerging, requiring leadership and unity. The core of today's threats started thousands of years ago when Russia, as Kyiv on Rus', defeated the Kabbalistic Khazars, whose kingdom was in modern-day Ukraine. Political figures supporting Ukraine are allegedly revealing themselves as traitors infiltrated by evil. The Khazars, from Asia, invaded Eastern Europe and established a powerful kingdom known for raiding. They were a mix of tribes with Turkic leaders. Khazarian warriors were known for raping and pillaging. The Rothschilds are allegedly Khazars, not Semitic Jews, and are Ashkenazi Jews. Khazars were given an ultimatum to choose a religion and chose Judaism, but secretly practiced satanism involving child sacrifice. Russians conquered the Khazar kingdom, driving them out. The Khazars escaped with their wealth, infiltrated Europe, and plotted revenge against Russia.

Ukraine is allegedly not a sovereign state with internationally recognized borders, but still part of Russia. Ukraine has been a center for globalists, with the CIA allegedly working there for decades to build resistance and exploit resources. There is a plan for the elite to create a new world order, but a new world order needs different characteristics. The core of today's threat started thousands of years ago when Russia was Kyivon Rus' and defeated the Khazars, whose kingdom was in contemporary Ukraine. Political figures supporting Ukraine and demonizing Russia are allegedly showing their true colors, revealing America's infiltration by traitors. The Khazars, from an Asiatic Mongolian region, invaded Eastern Europe and established a powerful kingdom. They were known for raiding, pillaging, and offering their warriors for hire with the condition of being able to rape and pillage after battles. The Rothschilds are allegedly Khazars, not Semitic Jews, and are now known as Ashkenazi Jews. The Khazarian king chose Judaism under pressure but secretly practiced Babylonian black magic, creating a satanic hybrid religion involving child sacrifice. Russian conquests drove out the Khazars, who escaped with their wealth and infiltrated Europe, continuing their rituals and plotting revenge against Russia.

The speaker explores the idea that many ancient and religious structures around the world may contain or reflect a hidden history in which angels or a previous advanced civilization played a direct role in their construction. They frame this as a pattern seen across continents and cultures, not as isolated myths, and urge viewers to consider information that challenges mainstream histories. Key points and examples: - The Basilica of the Holy House in Loreto, Italy is described as a Marian shrine said to enshrine the house Mary lived in, with a claim that angels flew the house from Nazareth. The host asks what happened to civilization’s know-how and suggests a hidden elite construction capability that predates current narratives. - The episode proposes that angels are repeatedly depicted or implied in construction narratives worldwide, implying a global, ancient, advanced knowledge that was later erased or suppressed. - Mecca’s Kaaba is cited as another example where the initial structure is said to have been built by angels, with angels revolving around it after its construction, reinforcing the theme of divine or otherworldly involvement in architecture. - Chartres Cathedral is highlighted as one of the world’s most incredible structures, with references to multiple cathedrals on the same site and a recurring pattern of rebuilding after fires, wars, or collapses. The narrator notes episodes about catacombs and basements beneath churches (catacombs under churches referenced in prior episodes) as evidence of hidden, extensive underground networks. - The narrator asserts that many cathedrals and churches sit atop or connect to vast underground catacombs and secret passages, containing bones and skulls arranged in patterns, suggesting ritual uses and a “previous civilization” beneath modern structures. - Specific examples of bone-related sites are described to illustrate ritualistic or ceremonial uses of skulls and bones: - The Ossuary in the Czech Republic, claimed to hold 40,000 to 70,000 skeletons artistically arranged as chandeliers and garlands, implying a deliberate, symbolic architectural practice. - The Chapel of Bones in Evora, Portugal, where interior walls are decorated with human bones, with a plaque declaring, “What you are now, we once were. What we are now, you shall be,” and the basement described as containing corpses used to decorate the chapel. - The Capuchin crypt in Rome, beneath Our Lady of the Conception, described as containing thousands of bones arranged in elaborate displays, suggesting ritual use rather than merely burial. - The Saint Peter and Paul Cathedral in Kazan, Russia, discussed as another example in the Tartaria hypothesis, with claims of previous cathedral sites, destruction narratives, and new narratives replacing older ones. - The narrator asserts that these bone-and-crypt installations indicate a regular, worldwide pattern rather than isolated events, and that there is a deliberate effort to obscure the true past. - Tartaria is introduced as a purported global civilization or culture, with maps, seals, griffins, and griffin imagery associated with Tartarian influence. The speaker discusses Tatarstan (Tataria) and Kazan as potential remnants of Tartarian activity, arguing that modern seals, coats of arms, and architectural styles reflect a “replacement narrative” by later populations. - The Kazan Kremlin and Epiphany Tower are presented as examples of “old world palaces” that appear in modern times, with claims that their actual construction predates current histories and may have involved a sophisticated, worldwide civilization. - The host critiques the conventional dating of structures and suggests widespread underground networks, interconnected palaces, and a hidden global history. They invite viewers to question dates, authorship, and the origins of architectural achievements, proposing that a powerful, ancient civilization left markers of its presence across the world. - The episode closes with a provocative suggestion that Tartaria may still be present in modern locations, prompting viewers to explore further and comment on whether this hidden history is real and where else such evidence might be found.

The transcript claims a classified CIA document titled *National Cultural Development Under Communism* (first published June 1957, immediately classified, approved for release 08/24/1999) explicitly mentions “Tartaria,” and uses the document to argue that Soviet communist authorities interfered with Muslim and minority cultural life, including through suppression of religion, confiscation of mosques and literature, and rewriting history. The document is presented as beginning with a Bolshevik proclamation dated 12/07/1917 promising Muslims of Russia—Tatars, Tatars and related groups in Volga, Crimea, Siberia, Turkestan, Transcaucasia, Chechens, mountain peoples, and those whose mosques and prayer houses were destroyed—that beliefs and customs and national and cultural institutions would be “forever free and inviolate,” and that they should organize national life in complete freedom. The transcript states Lenin and Stalin promised equality, sovereignty, self-determination (including secession), abolition of national and national religious privileges, and freedom of development for national minorities and ethnographic groups, followed by Soviet suppression contradicting those promises. The transcript then details a sequence of repressive measures attributed to communists in the Muslim regions of Russia: confiscation of mosque lands (1918); outlawing Muslim religious brotherhoods (1921–1922); ridicule of Islam and undermining spiritual leaders; making Islamic religious life “virtually impossible” (1929); elimination of Islamic leadership via arrest and deportation (and “liquidation”); closing nearly all village and most city mosques; suppressing religious literature through alphabet changes, confiscation of religious texts including the Quran, and suppression of religious publications; dismissal of pious practicing Muslims from responsible positions. It cites a decline in the number of mosques admitted by Soviet authorities: from 7,000 mosques in European Russia alone at the time of 1917, to 1,312 mosques in the whole Soviet Union by 1942, with examples including Tashkent (from 300 to 20), Samarkand (from over 100 to 17, with only one usable), Bukhara (from 360 to one), and Al Maratha (no mosques remaining). It also states communist authorities condemned publication of Muslim literary works except those extolling Russian and Russians. The transcript returns to cultural heritage, arguing that communist interference extended to history. It describes a specific directive dated 08/09/1944 by the Central Committee of the Communist Party, instructing the Tatar provincial committee to conduct a “scientific revision” of Tartaria/Tatar history to eliminate “shortcomings and mistakes” of a nationalistic character by writers and historians, in order to remove references to “great Russian aggressions” and hide the “real course” of Tatar-Russian relations. It further claims historians in Muslim areas of the USSR rewrote history at party orders to portray Russians favorably, and that truthful histories were withdrawn and destroyed to deny Muslims and Tatars access to genuine accounts of the past. The transcript emphasizes that the CIA document’s inclusion of “Tartaria” in the 1950s is presented as important. In addition to the CIA-document discussion, the transcript shifts to historical geography research using early modern books and maps. It describes a “compendium of geography” released in 1691 by Lawrence Ecard and an additional world description (1715) with similar geography, suggesting they copied from shared sources while showing minor coordinate differences. The transcript quotes from the 1690/1691 geography text portraying “Tartary” as the “greatest country in the world,” lying east of Russia and north of Persia, India, and China, bounded by longitudes 83rd to 180th degree and latitudes 39th to 72nd degree, with an asserted length of about 4,000 miles and breadth about 2,000 miles. It states Tartary had ancient provinces (Scythia, Sake, Sogdania, and part of Cimatia Asiatica, plus some Old Persia) and had remained unconquered until “Anno eleven sixty two,” when the Tatars and “obscure people” overran it and elected a monarchy, with “a good part” later “fallen away.” The transcript discusses claims that Tartary is related to Mongol rule and uses the name “great sham of Tartary” as associated with China, asserting the emperor is “also the famous country of China.” It further claims that “Shambalu” (presented as the imperial seat) is not Peking/Beijing, proposing that commonly asserted identifications are mistaken. It argues using references to “Kambalu,” “Khanbaliq,” and “Kambaluk,” and compares placement with the Great Wall, claiming Kambalu is north of the Great Wall and that “Beijing/Peking” is south of it. To support its geographic argument, the transcript quotes from a printed book (1679) attributed to Tamerlane’s historian, describing a conflict involving Calyx and the city of Kambalu/Kambaluk/Kumbalu, and then describes an invasion of China beginning with references to “Liyotom and Pekin,” using repeated references to wall-crossing as evidence that “Kambalu” and “Pekin/Beijing” are presented as distinct. It maintains that if the same locations were involved, the narrative of crossing the wall and the sequence of revolt and conquest would not align. It then discusses plotting the claimed Tartary coordinates on maps and connects coordinate ranges to areas where Russian expansion and treaties (e.g., Treaty of Natchinsk) are said to have affected Tartaria’s location, arguing that exact location around the time of the document is “debatable.” The transcript develops further geographic assertions about “Cathay” versus “Manji,” stating that Cathay is north of the Great Wall and Manji is south of it. It references multiple maps (including those from 1689 and 1570) to claim “Cathay” corresponds to areas beyond the Great Wall and that Kambalu is located in Cathay. It describes river names and regions (including references to Obi and other rivers/lakes difficult to locate today), and it ties these claims to how Tamerlane is said to move to Cathay and then “jump the wall” into China. It then moves into “American Tartary” discussions. Using references from 1652 and other materials (including Uzziah Priest and later authors), it argues that some 17th–19th century sources used the phrase “American Tartary” (or “an American Tartary”) to describe areas in North America that resemble “Asiatic/Tartary.” It addresses claims that one map (1652) suggests Tartary-controlled North America by matching coloration but argues it does not indicate full continental control. The transcript then expands into multiple “lost city” and “gold” narratives (e.g., Quivera/Quivera stories tied to Coronado, and alleged connections to “King Tartarax”), also citing an 1851/1830s style literature tradition that portrays indigenous peoples as having Tatar/Scythian origins or characteristics. The transcript repeatedly states that learned people in the 1700s–1800s believed connections between Tatars/Scythians and indigenous North American peoples, tying this to Bering Strait crossing theories and various scholarly arguments. Later, the transcript returns to Greenland and ice. It begins with claims that satellite imagery appears to show Greenland as “completely” covered in ice, and discusses an asserted ice-free history: it states beryllium-10/aluminum-26 dating suggests Greenland bedrock was exposed for more than 280,000 years until about 1,100,000 years ago, and it summarizes claims of long-term ice-sheet coverage “for the last eighteen million years,” with periods of reduction. It argues that if Greenland’s ice disappeared, it would most likely appear as an archipelago due to bedrock depression under ice weight. The transcript connects this to references in older literature (e.g., Burton’s *Anatomy of Melancholy*) describing Greenland as frozen for “half the year,” and it discusses old maps showing possible passages or canals through Greenland. It claims forums and maps (including ones from 1747/1592 and later) suggest a central passage “formerly passable” but later choked with ice. It mentions a 1888 expedition by Friedrich Nansen and notes that Nansen’s planned route aligned with the location of the alleged canal. The transcript concludes by stating that its Greenland and canal information is attributed to external forums, and frames the central question as whether there could have been ancient ruins or a once-passable Greenland corridor, then transitions back to broader Tartaria/indigenous-origin discussions and ends.

The speaker claims that many Jews in the reconstituted state of Israel today come from Eastern Europe and are not descendants of the Judeans or the lost tribes of Israel, but rather descendants of the Kazakhs. They describe Kazakhs as a nation most people do not know of. The speaker states, “He writes, the so called self styled Jews in Eastern Europe in modern history cannot legitimately point to a single ancient ancestor who ever set even a foot on the soil of Palestine in the era of bible history.” They also assert, “Research also revealed that the so called or self styled Jews in Eastern Europe were never Semites, are not Semites now nor can they ever be regarded as Semites at any future time by any stretch of the imagination.”

The speaker claims that Eastern European Jews, who constitute 92% of the world’s Jewish population, were originally Khazar. The Khazars are described as a warlike tribe from deep in Asia who were so formidable that even neighboring peoples drove them out of Asia into Eastern Europe. To explain Eastern Europe, the speaker states that the Khazar Kingdom was the largest country in Europe, spanning 800,000 square miles, and that there were no Russia or other countries at that time. The Khazars allegedly loaned 40,000 soldiers to other monarchs when they went to war, illustrating their immense power. The speaker notes that the Khazars were phallic worshipers, labeling this as filthy, and says this was part of their pagan or barbarian religious practices. According to the account, the king grew distrustful of the kingdom’s degeneracy and chose a monotheistic faith—either Christianity, Islam, or what is known today as Judaism (described pejoratively as “communism” here). By randomly selecting a faith with a spinning top, the king purportedly chose Judaism and established it as the state religion. He then sent to the Talmudic schools and brought up thousands of rabbis, opening synagogues and schools across the Khazar kingdom. The size of the population is given as 800,000 people in a territory of 800,000 square miles, with the speaker asserting there were perhaps 10 to 20,000,000 people who became Jews under this system. A central claim is that none of these Jews had an ancestor who ever paid toll in the holy land, extending this assertion back not only to the Old Testament but to “the beginning of time.” The overall narrative suggests that the modern Jewish population in Eastern Europe arose from the Khazar conversion to Judaism, resulting in a large, mono-religious community in that region.

The speaker claims that Ukraine is not a sovereign state and has been part of Russia since the 10th century. They believe that Ukraine is controlled by globalists and the CIA, who want access to its resources. Another speaker discusses the idea of a new world order and the need for the United Nations to play a role in it. They mention the rise and fall of the Khazars, an ancient society that invaded Eastern Europe. The Khazars were known for their brutality and practiced pagan rituals. The speaker suggests that the Rothschilds, who claim to be Jewish, are actually Khazars. The Khazars were eventually driven out by Russian conquests, but their influence spread across Europe. They seek revenge against Russia and other nations that defeated them.

The speaker discusses a 1583 map that allegedly shows Russia and Tartaria together, highlighting Tartaria as a vast land not mentioned in history books and suggesting it has been suppressed. This leads to questions about what happened to Tartaria and who took over its groups. The map is also used to argue that New Guinea (referred to as the land of Mu or Lemuria) was once massive and located much closer to the Americas than it appears today, with evidence claimed to be visible in the Library of Congress’ Rare Book and Special Collections Division. The speaker points to features on the map, such as Tartaria, Chalaga, and areas labeled in shaded regions, and references a map from 1544 where Antarctica appears green and a Map of Mundi showing connections, mentioning a phrase “here be dragons” on maps and contrasting that with the Latin label sci and tific implying fiction. The narrative asserts that mainstream history is fabricated and altered to hide a previous, advanced civilization that constructed palaces globally and underground tunnel networks. It is claimed that the old world hid dragons and more land, with history designed to control people by keeping them lost and following leaders toward an uncertain destination. The Chicago Tunnel episode is updated via an anonymous source stating his wife worked in the Tribune Building (Chillaga) in Chicago and that it contains eight sub basements; half housing large equipment and half for storage, with guards and off-limits access, suggesting concealment of truth underground. The speaker describes Derinkuayo (Turkey) as an ancient, multilevel underground city in Cappadocia that could accommodate up to 20,000 people and contained wine and oil presses, stables, and storage rooms. Rooms on the left are claimed to have been misrepresented by mainstream historians as for studies, with the presenter arguing that such narratives are fabrications and that critical reading is needed to detect them. The city is said to have 18 levels of tunnels, with up to 200 small underground cities connected, forming a massive subterranean network, and thousands of miles of tunnels beneath major cities worldwide. The possibility that these tunnels required light sources deeply underground is raised, challenging the idea that electricity or light bulbs emerged only in the 19th century; the presenter argues that a light source would have been necessary 18 levels down, making simplistic tunnel-building explanations implausible. The discussion entertains the possibility of a species that thrived underground or an ancient group like the Anunnaki (linked to Anu and the Sumerian legends) being hidden underground, rather than an extraterrestrial origin. References are made to ant-people legends in Native American lore, including Ant people who supposedly guided virtuous humans during earth’s upheavals, and a potential link between the Babylonian sky god Anu and the Hopi term for ant, suggesting global confounding narratives. The Iraq Museum looting in 2003 is cited, with 15,000 objects stolen and thousands of manuscripts destroyed, alongside the National Library and Archives fire destroying thousands of manuscripts and 170,000 artifacts, framed as evidence that important past information has been erased to control the future. An article from twenty-one years prior is mentioned about the existence of huge underground tunnel networks beneath Iraq, presenting this as part of the broader claim that vast tunnel systems exist beneath many places, concealed from public view.

Tartaria, a location missing from our education, is actually modern-day Russia. Within it lies Tatarstan, where remnants of a forgotten civilization stand. Their historical coat of arms featured a griffin, later replaced, symbolizing a global takeover. In Tatarstan's cities, repurposed old-world structures hint at a deeper history, with windows near ground level suggesting buried levels. The Nicholas Cathedral's story raises questions about its true construction date, a common theme worldwide. The Saint Peter And Paul Cathedral's narrative, filled with improbable details, mirrors AI-generated stories used to conceal the past. Kazan, in Tatarstan, may be the central base of Tartaria, filled with griffins. The Kazan Kremlin, an important site with a mysterious tower, possibly built by the previous civilization. Even with a small population, the area contains palaces. Gas station logos suggest Tartaria's continued presence, ready to be revealed to the world.

Speaker 1 claims that the name "Russia" comes from " рассеяния," the territory of the "great race" (white people), who were voluntary migrants from other star systems. This area was part of the ancient Slavic-Aryan empire, called Россинией west of the Urals, and Земля святорасы east of them. Свято-раса comprised four "рода асов": доарийцы, харийцы, расены, святорусы. Foreigners called it Великая Тартария, the largest country in the world, according to the 1771 Британская энциклопедия. Tартария included Западная Сибирь, Восточная Сибирь, Дальний Восток, Китайская Тартария, Независимая Тартария, Тибетская Тартария, and Монгольская Тартария (modern Pakistan). Московия was also a Тартария. The empire weakened after the Джунгар destroyed its capital, Асгард Ирийский (Omsk), in 1530 AD. Its population was mainly славяне, especially русские. People identified as "дети Тарха и Тары." Humans arrived on Earth 40,000 years ago via "Звездные врата." The "Уры" from Урай were highly developed гуманоиды who taught others. Волхвы preserved knowledge using даарийские and хаарийские письмена. After the Уры disappeared, славяне formed касты. Some became скотты, полянами, or древлянами. Some left due to famine, led by князья like Сармат and Скиф, but remained русы. New славянские племена emerged. In 1999, a рельефная карта of Западная Сибирь was found near Чандар. Славяно-арийские веды mention Вайтманы and Вайтмары. The ромбические площадки were посадочные площадки. The Ночь Сварога began 1,500 years ago. The Книга Велеса details славян history for 20,000 years, mentioning a great cooling caused by Фата falling to Earth. A war with Аримия (China) occurred 7,519 years ago, commemorated as сотворение мира в Звездном храме. In the 11th century, Анна Ярославна found Paris primitive. She brought a library, including the Велесова книга, translated by Сулокадзаев. The Велесова книга tells of славяне leaving Семиречье (Беловодье). The word "история" means stories of the иудейский народ. Асгард Ирийский was destroyed in 1530 AD, weakening the empire and allowing provinces to declare independence. This enabled the фальсификация of Russian history.

Darrell recounts a conversation with someone from a time far in the future. The person claims that when Hillary Clinton won her first term, the United States became like South Africa, and that his ancestors were openly raped and murdered, with police and press doing nothing; if a home was broken into and they shot the intruder, they were tried for murder and jailed. He describes a planned sequence for Hillary Clinton’s second term: the inside conquest would be too difficult due to the armed population, so they would cause a war with China that was meant to be lost, leading to America being carpet-bombed with nuclear weapons. Afterward, a hundred-year breeding program was begun, sending people from different countries. Lighter-skinned people were sent to Asia, while darker-skinned people were killed off for a century. After population buildup in Asia, they repopulated North America, South America, Australia, and other continents, resulting in a single, supposedly unified people with no diversity. They later realized this was a mistake. The future narrator also claimed that the people were building a biological weapon in Ukraine intended to kill off Slavic people, who were described as spiritually enlightened. He said Slavs are the most spiritually evolved, whereas Anglo-Saxons have a connection to the earth due to interbreeding with the original inhabitants, including Neanderthals. The supposed Satanists supposedly needed to keep people alive to preserve the world’s duality. They allegedly interbred with other populations rather than annihilating them, while Slavs were killed off. A recurring line from the future figure emphasized, “must ensure the survival of the Anglo Saxon. The Anglo Saxon is the true potential for without the Anglo Saxon, we will not go beyond fifth century. Without the Anglo Saxon, we will not reach our true potential.” Darrell notes that, whenever he questioned the beliefs, the speaker pressed this point; eventually, the speaker stopped pressing the question as to why these actions were being done, suggesting the matter was already partly decided. Darrell then shifts to a more meta moment, with Speaker 1 reacting to a claim about the past and future, hinting at a significance beyond ordinary history. The exchange ends with Speaker 1 describing the trophy-like object as a trophy of the future that represents the past, present, and future, noting that it travels as well.

Vladimir Putin presents a long, historically framed justification for Russia’s actions and the Ukraine conflict, arguing that Ukraine’s status and borders have been shaped by centuries of Russian influence, foreign domination, and shifting empires. He begins by outlining Ukraine’s origins in a narrative of a centralized Russian state forming around Kyiv and Novgorod, with key moments including the adoption of Orthodoxy in 988, the fragmentation of Rus, and the subsequent rise of Moscow as the center of a unified Russian state. He asserts that lands now in Ukraine were historically part of Russia, and that Polish and Lithuanian unions, as well as later Polish oppression and colonization, shaped Ukrainian identity as a fringe or border region rather than a separate nation. He claims documents show Ukrainian lands and peoples sought Moscow’s rule in 1654 and that Catherine the Great later reclaimed those lands for Russia, reinforcing a line that Ukraine’s borders were continually redrawn by empires. Putin emphasizes that the Soviet period created a Soviet Ukraine, and that Lenin’s decisions and Ukrainianization policies made Ukraine an “artificial state” formed by Stalin’s later redrawing of borders after World War II, incorporating Black Sea lands and other territories into the Ukrainian republic. He questions whether Hungary or other neighbors should reclaim lands lost in earlier centuries, and shares a personal anecdote about Hungarians in Western Ukraine as evidence of long-standing ethnic ties there. He suggests that post-Soviet borders were decided under coercive international pressures and that NATO’s expansion violated assurances given to Russia in 1990 not to expand eastward. The interview then moves to the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union and Russia’s expectation of a welcoming partnership with the West that did not materialize. Putin contends that NATO expanded five times despite Russian hopes for cooperation, and recounts a perceived Western willingness to undermine Russia’s security through missile defense systems, support for separatists in the Caucasus, and a “special relationship” with Ukraine. He tells a story of a 2000s-era dialogue with US leaders about a joint missile defense system, describing assurances from US officials (Gates, Rice) that such cooperation might occur, which he says later failed and led Russia to develop its own hypersonic capabilities in response. He insists that the West’s treatment of Serbia in the 1990s—bombing Belgrade and overriding UN norms—demonstrates a double standard and a willingness to ignore international law when it serves Western interests. He asserts that the Bucharest 2008 agreement promised NATO membership to Ukraine and Georgia, despite opposition from Germany, France, and others, and claims that President Bush pressured European partners to expand NATO anyway. He argues that Ukraine’s move toward association with the EU would harm Russian economic interests, given their interlinked industries, and that Yanukovych’s hesitation to sign the association agreement was abruptly exploited by the West, leading to the Maidan coup in 2014. On the Donbas and Minsk, Putin states that Ukraine’s leadership in 2014 declared they would not implement Minsk and that Western leaders openly admitted they never intended to implement Minsk. He says Russia’s goal was to stop the war started by neo-Nazis in Ukraine in 2014, not to invade in 2022, and he blames the West for pushing Ukraine toward militarization and for pressuring Kyiv. He claims the current Ukrainian leadership and its foreign backers refused to engage in negotiations and even banned talks with Russia, citing Istanbul negotiations as a missed opportunity that could have ended the war many months earlier. Denazification is presented as a central objective: Putin describes a nationalist Ukrainian movement that idolizes figures who collaborated with Nazi Germany, culminating in neo-Nazi iconography and the glorification of Bandera-era figures. He argues that Ukraine’s leadership and legislature have supported or tolerated neo-Nazi symbolism, including a Canadian parliament ceremony supporting a former SS member who fought against Russians. He insists denazification would mean prohibiting neo-Nazi movements at the legislative level and removing their influence in Ukraine, and says Ukraine’s leadership has refused to implement this, contrasting it with Istanbul’s negotiated proposals that supposedly prohibited Nazism in Ukraine. Regarding negotiations and settlements, Putin says Russia is open to dialogue and that Istanbul proposals could have ended the conflict eighteen to twenty-four months earlier if not for Western influence, particularly Johnson’s opposition. He states Russia is not seeking to humiliate Ukraine but wants a negotiated settlement, including the withdrawal of troops and protection for Russian-speaking populations. He suggests that Zelenskyy’s freedom to negotiate exists, but asserts Kyiv’s decrees and the influence of the United States and its allies have prevented meaningful talks. He contends that the Ukraine conflict is driven by a Western-led alliance system that seeks to deter Russia and preserve strategic advantages, while Russia seeks a multipolar world where security is shared. In discussing geopolitics and economics, Putin argues the global order is shifting. He notes a rising China and a growing BRICS, with the United States increasingly using sanctions and weaponizing the dollar, which he believes undermines American power. He provides statistics: Russia’s share of dollar-denominated trade has fallen, yuan and ruble use have risen, and he suggests the dollar’s role as a reserve currency is eroding as countries seek alternatives. He asserts that the world should not be split into two blocs and that cooperation with China is essential, highlighting a bilateral trade volume with China around 230–240 billion dollars and saying their trade is balanced and high-tech oriented. Finally, Putin discusses broader questions about religion and identity, linking Orthodoxy to Russian national character and arguing that Russia’s spiritual and cultural ties unify diverse peoples within the country. He rejects the notion that war contradicts Christian ethics, arguing that defending the homeland and its people is a form of protection rather than aggression. Throughout the interview, Putin reframes the Ukraine conflict as a consequence of Western expansion and security policy, presents Russia as seeking peace and dialogue, and positions Moscow as defending historical legitimacy, protecting Russian-speaking populations, and resisting a re-drawn European security architecture that he argues threatens Russia’s sovereignty. He repeatedly points to missed opportunities for negotiated settlement and emphasizes that additional talks remain possible if Western leadership chooses to engage in good faith.

The speaker claims that our history is a lie and introduces the concept of the Tartarians, an advanced race who built buildings to obtain free energy. They suggest that these buildings are wrongly attributed to different architectural styles, and the true history has been falsified. The theory proposes that a powerful organization opposed Tartaria as it threatened their control over energy sales. This organization supposedly destroyed Tartaria and erased their existence from history. However, evidence still exists in the form of buildings and structures that share a common theme of energy harvesting.

The Tartarians were an advanced race who built impressive buildings, but their existence has been hidden and falsified. There is evidence that they were erased from history by a powerful organization that controlled the world through energy sales. This organization feared the end of their control if Tartaria's free energy technology became known. Despite their efforts, evidence of Tartaria can still be found in various architectural structures. These structures, built by different nations, share common features that suggest an advanced civilization. Our history has been manipulated, and there is much more to uncover.

The speaker discusses the Tartarian Empire, a supposedly advanced civilization that existed before the 1800s but was erased from history. They mention that the CIA admitted to rewriting Tartarian history and provide evidence from a 1957 directive. The speaker questions why Tartaria is depicted on old world maps and showcases impressive buildings and inventions attributed to the civilization. They suggest that the empire was buried by a flood, explaining the appearance of buried buildings and basement windows. The speaker speculates that underground tunnels may be related to this buried empire and proposes that Tartarians knew how to harness free energy. They conclude by posing the question of who these buildings were built for.