TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

What needs to be established is whether the FBI and government agents used undercover operatives on January 6th. If evidence shows they had informants, it undermines the insurrection narrative. There’s reasonable suspicion of federal involvement, especially with video evidence of a person directing people into the building and the case of Ray Epps, who was briefly on the FBI's most wanted list. Two significant points support this: Epps’ sudden removal from the list suggests he may have been an informant, and FBI official Jill Sanborn's refusal to answer whether federal agents were involved indicates possible involvement. Her silence implies that confirming their presence could compromise ongoing operations.

Democrats say we need to find out exactly what happened on January 6, and actually we strongly agree with that. Thomas Massey of Kentucky confronted Merrick Garland with footage of a man called Ray Epps, who apparently lives in Arizona. Epps was in Washington the night before, January 5, encouraging Trump supporters to enter the Capitol Building illegally. "Here's a guy telling Trump supporters they need to break the law and go into the capital. That's real video." "And then they accuse him of being an undercover federal agent. That's pretty interesting." Massey asked, "Has he been indicted? Who or where is he exactly?" Garland refused to answer, saying he would not comment on an ongoing investigation or "how many federal operatives were there in the crowd that day." We don't know whether this Epps guy was working with the federal government. A Revolver News piece notes the FBI removed a photo of Epps from its most wanted page after their reporting; it says "Ray Epps is everywhere" on Jan 6, and "twenty seconds before the very first breach" he whispers. The FBI scrubbed Epps' face a day after Revolver reported on Rhodes; the host calls it "awfully weird" and invites Epps to appear.

The video explores the question of whether undercover agents or assets for the federal government played a role in agitating people to enter the Capitol on January 6th. The focus is on a man named Ray Epps, who was captured on video encouraging protesters to go into the Capitol. The video analyzes Epps' interactions with Baked Alaska, a livestreamer, and highlights Epps' repetitive phrases and unusual behavior. It also reveals a previously unseen conversation where Epps whispers, "storm the Capitol" to Baked Alaska. The video raises questions about Epps' possible involvement and the lack of attention given to his actions.

In this video, there are discussions about the involvement of FBI agents and informants in the events of January 6th. Questions are raised about whether they committed crimes or encouraged violence. The focus then shifts to a man named Ray Epps, who was initially on the FBI's most wanted list but was later removed. The video also shows footage of individuals removing fences and discusses how easy it was for people to be drawn into the breach site. The brother of a man involved in the Capitol insurrection is interviewed, highlighting their political differences. There are also mentions of Antifa and questions about Speaker Pelosi's involvement. The video concludes with criticism of the January 6th committee's refusal to ask important questions.

The conversation centers on a set of claims and observations about January 6 that orbit around Sedition Hunters, Ray Epps, and the so-called “Northwest Scaffold Commander.” The speakers discuss and link multiple pieces of information to argue that the FBI and other agencies were paying close attention to, or coordinating with, covert actor networks on that day. - The discussion opens with a reference to a John Solomon article about Sedition Hunters and claims that the FBI and Justice Department paid Sedition Hunters about $150,000 to gather evidence on January 6 protesters to help the FBI make arrests. They note the figure was reported as over $100,000 in some places and $150,000 in a House hearing, and they say the FBI/DOJ paid Sedition Hunters, the SPLC, the ADL, the Atlantic Council, DFR Lab, and Bellingcat for intelligence. - The main focus shifts to a piece titled Meet Ray Epps (December 2021) by the speakers’ interlocutor, where they argue that the “main star of the show” was not Ray Epps, but a different figure labeled Northwest Scaffold Commander (referred to as Scaffold Commander). They emphasize that Sedition Hunters’ archives identified Scaffold Commander as their number-one suspect, although he was not placed on the FBI’s most-wanted list. - They recount how, on January 8, 2021, the FBI’s most-wanted list listed Ray Epps as a top suspect in the case, with public calls for information and a cash reward. By late June 2021, a Phoenix newspaper identified him as “Reyes,” and on July 1, 2021, the FBI removed Epps from the wanted list with no explanation and no arrest. They contrast this with Scaffold Commander, who was never added to the FBI’s public wanted list for identification by the public, despite being the focal point of Sedition Hunters’ investigations. - The speakers describe Scaffold Commander as an older man with glasses, a nerdy mask, and a blue cap, who allegedly directed the breach from the Northwest scaffold overlooking the Capitol. They claim he used a bullhorn to issue commands for approximately 18 minutes to an hour and a half, from 1:00 PM to about 2:30 PM, urging the crowd with phrases like “Move forward,” “Don’t just stand there,” “Help somebody over the wall,” and “We gotta fill up the capital.” - They juxtapose these observations with the chronology of the breach: the first breach around 12:53 PM, the crowd’s advance toward the Capitol, and the moment rioters entered the building. They argue Scaffold Commander acted as a ringleader and that Ray Epps was directly beneath him in the crowd, effectively functioning as an internal participant who helped draw people toward the front. - A key point they stress is that Scaffold Commander’s high perch and commanding role align with a long-cited CIA manual from 1983, Psychological Operations in Guerrilla Warfare, which describes a small cadre of crowd agitators operating from elevated positions to direct slogans and crowd movement. They quote and reference passages describing an “outside commando element” that stays above the crowd to observe and direct a demonstration, using high observation points to shout instructions and guide the crowd’s actions. - The speakers argue that the FBI has not acknowledged Scaffold Commander, has not included him on any public list, and has not publicly solicited identification for him, despite Sedition Hunters’ focus on him as the pivotal organizer. They suggest that internal FBI records, memos, or emails about Scaffold Commander could be highly revealing, potentially showing whether higher-ups instructed not to pursue him. - They conclude by urging the FBI and related investigators to search their internal records for “Northwest Scaffold Commander” and make any relevant documents public, implying that such records could undermine the official narrative of the event. They also frame the existence of an internal, externally guided command structure as a critical piece of the January 6 story that remains underexplored by authorities.

"I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol Building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." "01/06/2021, the media propaganda machine fed us a story that shapes the narrative of insurrection." "They intentionally left out some key details." "There's an entire timeline that you haven't seen and it tells a different story." "They're going into the capital, I think." "It looks like they got sniper rifles." "We want to petition our government for the redress of grievances." "Notice the smoke from the sniper's barrel?" "What do you think that means?" "This is where Joshua Black is shot in the face." "He never saw it coming." "The agitator Landon Copeland admitted to being a member of Antifa just after being sentenced for his involvement." "They're trying to save this guy's life right now."

We had full cooperation from the Capitol Police and the speaker's office, but we couldn't show that FBI agents were present in the crowd, which the FBI has admitted. Ray Epps was not a civilian; he encouraged violence, yet the January 6th committee defended him. There were clear signs of federal involvement, like individuals with earpieces breaking things and then fleeing. I didn't want to wrongly label anyone as an agent without proof. The recent Proud Boys trial revealed an FBI agent lied and hid evidence. We need crowdsourcing for the footage, which should be public. The narrative around January 6th has been misrepresented; it was a violent political demonstration, not a deadly insurrection. Intelligence about the event was withheld from Capitol Police, suggesting a deliberate attempt to create chaos for political gain.

I was going to discuss the January 6 hostages and the actions being taken regarding them. There's a lot happening, and you'll see more action soon. I also wanted to address Joe's recent pardons for individuals guilty of serious crimes, particularly related to the unselect committee that destroyed crucial information, including evidence about Nancy Pelosi rejecting an offer of 10,000 soldiers for security. Even 500 soldiers could have made a difference that day, despite the large crowd. There are many great photos from that day that aren't shown, focusing instead on the Capitol events. I was encouraged to wait to discuss these topics, but I felt it was important to bring them up now.

Discussion centers on the agent provocateur angle of January 6. They claim there were federal agents involved in instigating the violence and entering the Capitol, and that "this one guy" has faced no legal consequences while others face "massive federal charges and four years plus in jail." They compare to the World Trade Organization riots in Seattle '99, saying "literal government agents went in wearing antifa outfits" to provoke violence and were released conveniently. They focus on "Ray Epps, the Fed protected provocateur who appears to have led the first January 6 attack on the US Capitol," referencing a Revolver article and a video. They debate whether he was initiated by government, radicalized and acting on his own, or a rogue agent; they note it shows intelligence agency problems. They worry about autocratic solutions and how social media exposes such cases; they end with "Red or black" and Ray Epps.

- "Do you know who Ray Epps is, and where is he? And, is he sitting behind bars like some of these other, protesters who've been sitting there without bail for so long?" - "And what we need to know is whether or not that cooperation existed on January 5 and January 6 to get people to do things that they might otherwise not do, like enter the capital." - "We already know as a consequence of reporting in revolver.news and in re really, that was confirmed by the New York Times that there were people texting their handlers from the crowd in January 5 and January 6." - "Now we just need to know whether the folks being controlled by the federal government were, in fact, the very people that were doing the worst things on January 6."

"the feds are entirely uninterested in this guy," "if anyone's a kind of major orchestrator in the first act of this so called breach of the capital, it would be him." "Epps' face was actually one of the first 20 faces that the FBI put on their January 6 most wanted list that anyone in DC would have seen, like, they had the posters everywhere." "Help us identify this man." "And then the Internet being what the Internet is, a remarkable vehicle, identified him within days and then crickets." "The feds weren't interested nothing about him until five months later, they scrubbed his face and name completely from their public database." "And the we were able to interpolate the exact day that they scrubbed it, and just by coincidence happened to be the very day after Revolver News ran an extensive piece on his, former, fellow oath keeper, Stuart Rhodes."

We had full cooperation from the Capitol Police and the speaker's office, but we couldn't show that FBI agents were in the crowd, which they admitted. Ray Epps was not just a civilian; he encouraged violence and was defended by the January 6th committee. There were clear signs of federal involvement, but I didn't want to wrongly accuse anyone without proof. Recent trials revealed FBI misconduct, including hiding evidence. We need to crowdsource the footage from January 6th, as it belongs to the public. The narrative of a violent insurrection is misleading; it was a political demonstration among many that year. Intelligence about the event was withheld from Capitol Police, suggesting a motive to create a politically damaging situation.

"He is calling for going into the capital the evening before January 6." "And this isn't just a one off, someone some crazy who comes and goes. No." "He goes repeatedly to group after group, redirecting them saying, we need to go into the capital." "on January 6, it's a veritable, where's Waldo? He's everywhere." "twenty seconds before the very first breach of the capital, this individual Ray Epps whispers into someone's ear," "So he's everywhere." "But what it did do is said that Ray Epps was acting alone." "the FBI scrubbed Epps's face from their database, from their public database, just a day after Revolver ran a report on his fellow oath keeper, Stuart Rhodes, who is also unindicted."

It's our constitutional duty to do oversight. He asks, "how many agents or assets of the government were present on January 5 and January 6 and agitating in the crowd to go into the capital and how many went into the capital. Can you answer that now?" Speaker 1 replies, "I don't know the answer to that question." The exchange continues: "I don't know the answer to either of those questions. If there were any, I don't know how many." "You've had two years to find out." The discussion mentions Ray Epps: "yesterday, you indicted him. Isn't that a wonderful coincidence on a misdemeanor?" and says, "you're sending grandmas to prison." It references a video claim: "the guy on video who's saying go into the capital," noting "10 videos, and it's an indictment for a misdemeanor?" In discovery, "the Justice Department prosecutors provided whatever information they had about the question that you're asking." "With respect to mister Epps, the FBI has said that he was not an employee or informant of the FBI." "Mister Epps has been charged, and there's a proceeding, I believe, going on today on that subject." "The charge is a joke."

Speaker describes Ray Epps as "a man walking about a psychological paradox as the events of January 6 are unfolding because he seems to be singularly driven by this desire to get people to enter the capital, but then he is overwhelmingly concerned with no harm to officers or nothing that would, impair the operations of potentially other people that could have been acting at the behest of the federal government." "What were the tells that this didn't strike you as a genuine MAGA grandfather?" The piece hinges on "the video footage itself," with Revolver News' clip "Where's Waldo?" following Epps from January 5 into January, sixth. He argues there was "no plan by in the case of the Trump supporters to go in." He was at the barricade on January 6, and "the very first breach of the Capitol occurred literally two seconds after this same Ray Epps whispers into somebody's ear." Described as "professional"—"cool cucumber" and a "cold professional," proficient at crowd control. Red flags include "radical extreme suggestions" like "let's go into the capital," with a "weird emotional detachment" from the content of what someone is saying.

Speaker 0 asks Miss Sandburn about Ray Epps and his suspicious behavior during the January 6th incident at the Capitol. He mentions Epps chanting about getting into the Capitol and the crowd suspecting him of being a federal agent. Speaker 0 also brings up Epps whispering to someone who then tears down barricades. He questions whether Epps urged them to do so. Speaker 0 mentions the FBI's public post seeking information on individuals involved in violent crimes, including Epps, but later Epps disappears from the list. Speaker 0 expresses concerns about the government's involvement in encouraging illegal conduct on January 6th and asks if federal agents actively encouraged violence. Miss Sandburn denies any knowledge of such actions.

The speakers discuss the Capitol incident on January 6th and focus on a person named Ray Epps. Speaker 1 claims that Epps caused damage and was initially on the FBI's list of top twenty people involved. However, Epps allegedly used his contacts within the organization to remove himself from the list. Speaker 1 saw Epps on January 5th near the BLM Plaza in Washington DC, where there was a protest. Speaker 1 urges the FBI to investigate Epps further. Speaker 0 expresses skepticism towards the media and Speaker 1 offers to call them instead of providing a phone number. The conversation ends with Speaker 0 requesting a way to contact Speaker 1.

Meet Ray Epps. Fucking yeah. At close. Meet Ray Epps, the Fed protected provocateur who appears to have led the very first one six attack January 6 attack on The US capital. So let's watch some of this because it's fucking crazy. It's really weird. This guy is doing this, like, over and over and over again. Yeah. This was there's a video of it. This is an article about Oh. So this is an article that's in revolver. Hold on. I'll get the video. We'll find the video because the the video is fucking strange. Ray Epps' video. Here it is. Like this. Well, that's twenty minutes long. Well, just watch. We'll see some of it.

Speaker 0: "What I'm saying is a reasonable suspicion is that there were agents. There's a video showing a guy with an earpiece pulling people into the building. Alright? Mhmm. You combine that with the evidence of Ray Epps, and it looks like you have a preponderance of evidence suggesting there may have been federal law enforcement involved in making that thing happen." Speaker 1: "I'll get you beyond a reasonable doubt. Two pieces of information. Ray Epps was on FBI's most wanted list one day, and the next day, he was off of the FBI's most wanted list. There are only two ways that happens. You die or your informant." Speaker 1: "Put that aside. Under congressional testimony, Jill Sanborn, who I used to work with, the head of the FBI counterintelligence division in charge of all these investigations, testified under oath when senator Cruz asked her, flat out, were there federal agents involved with January 6? And she said, quote, senator, I can't answer that at this time." Speaker 1: "The reason she said I can't answer that is because of the same stonewalling they gave us during Russergate with Christopher Steelehauper and everybody else. It's the same narrative, and and I'm telling you they were there." Speaker 0: "You're so you're saying that she said I can't answer that because the answer is yes Yeah. And that would compromise whatever their operation was. Exactly."

There is reasonable suspicion that federal agents were involved in the January 6th events, supported by a video showing an individual with an earpiece directing people into the building. Additionally, Ray Epps was briefly on the FBI's most wanted list, raising questions about his status as either deceased or an informant. Under congressional testimony, Jill Sanborn, head of the FBI Counterintelligence Division, was asked about federal agents' involvement and stated she couldn't answer at that time. This evasiveness suggests a potential cover-up, as a definitive "no" would have been expected if there were no agents involved.

We had cooperation from the Capitol Police and the speaker's office, but we couldn't show that FBI agents were in the crowd, which they admitted. Ray Epps was not just a civilian; he encouraged violence, yet the January 6th committee defended him. There were clear signs of federal involvement, but I didn't want to wrongly accuse anyone. The recent Proud Boys trial revealed an FBI agent lied and hid evidence, raising questions about their role. We need to crowdsource the footage, as it's publicly owned. The claims about January 6th being a violent insurrection are misleading; it was a political demonstration among many that year. Intelligence about potential violence was withheld from Capitol Police, suggesting a deliberate attempt to create chaos and discredit a political party.

That one moment changed what we knew about Ray Epps that night when he whispered storm the capital before it had happened and echoed the official narrative before it was broadcast across the nation. Of supporters of president Trump stormed The US Capitol Building. We ran it through forensic software that technical investigators use for analyzing audio and video to make sure we heard correctly, and it had not been altered. Epps, who continued to direct people to the capital in the cold light of day on January 6, did not go into the capital himself, according to the January 6 committee and the FBI. He's never explained publicly why he said storm the capital, what he meant by that, or what he may have known. So why hasn't it been addressed? Nobody cared about the Ray Epp story.

Is this potentially the biggest setup in U.S. history? It could be one of the greatest crimes against the American people. It's crucial to uncover the truth, especially regarding the cover-ups after January 6th. What about the Republicans involved in those cover-ups? Addressing that is challenging since it's within your own party. However, we will follow the evidence wherever it leads, regardless of the implications. I’ll hold you to that commitment.

January 6th was a complex event shrouded in deception. Initially, I sensed something was wrong with the official narrative. The surveillance footage reveals that those at the Capitol were not insurrectionists but rather sightseers who believed the election was stolen. Some individuals, like Ray Epps, encouraged the crowd but faced no charges, raising questions about their roles. Epps lied to investigators about his actions that day. Additionally, Speaker Pelosi inaccurately claimed she hadn’t spoken to the Capitol Police chief during the incident, despite multiple calls. Many politicians, regardless of party, have shown a willingness to mislead the public about January 6th, selectively presenting evidence to support their narratives.

Is this the biggest setup in U.S. history? It could be. This situation represents a significant crime against the American people. It's crucial to uncover the truth, especially regarding the cover-ups that followed January 6th. There are also Republicans involved in these cover-ups, which complicates the discussion. Despite party affiliations, we must pursue the evidence wherever it leads. I will hold you accountable for that commitment.