reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses Ivermectin, a Merck product, and its ingredients, including benzo alcohol, glycols, and polysorbate 80, which is also used in vaccines to help heavy metals cross the blood-brain barrier. Propylene glycol, also found in antifreeze, is another ingredient. The speaker claims parasites accumulate due to heavy metal pollution, and while Ivermectin may kill the worms, it doesn't address the underlying heavy metal issue. The speaker alleges the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has rights to Ivermectin pills. The speaker suggests using natural foods like pumpkin seeds, papaya seeds, beets, carrots, and dragon's blood to remove heavy metals from the body instead of funding big pharma.

The discussion centers on the idea that the body creates parasites as a detox signal. Wendy Meyer, a microbiologist, is cited as explaining that parasites and candida are formed to eat heavy metals in the body, alongside other detox responses such as fever, chills, and nausea, which signal that something is wrong. The speaker notes that searching online will reveal thousands of studies and the claim that “parasites are the accumulation indicators of heavy metal pollution.” On detox methods, the speaker asserts that detoxification is easy and lists substances that purportedly pull out heavy metals, including wormwood; dragon's blood; borax; turpentine; chiller jot; raw meat; cilantro; cayenne; pumpkin seeds; moldy berries; and baking soda. The discussion then pivots to ivermectin, suggesting a critique of pharmaceutical companies as the creators of ivermectin and implying a broader conspiracy about who controls medicine. A conspiratorial thread is developed: the same entities who make vaccines are claimed to be behind ivermectin, with a provocative claim that “the Rockefellers own the pharmaceutical companies.” The speakers argue that there is a war on worms, a war on bacteria, and a war on “you,” framed as profit-driven attacks. It is asserted that the Rockefellers also own Planned Parenthood, the medical system, and the educational system, and that this constitutes brainwashing both domestically and internationally. The implication is that pills are promoted, leading to ongoing poisoning of people and animals, ensuring customers for life. The transcript concludes by recommending the book Murder by Injection by Eustace Mullins as a resource to understand that the medical system has been owned by the Rockefeller family since 1910, describing it as driven by profits. The overall narrative ties body detox, parasite and heavy metal discussion, detox remedies, and the ivermectin debate to a larger conspiracy about control of medicine and health systems by powerful interests.

Speaker 0: President of The United States just posted this. Speaker 1: Show them the thimerosal bomb, which we keep in a metal container because we're a little afraid of it, and it's a very fine powder. Speaker 2: This is this is thimerosal, which is labeled very toxic, has cumulative effects, can cause damage to the kidneys, to the respiratory system, skin, to the, nervous system. Specifically warns on here that it can cause reproductive and developmental toxicity, meaning that it can cause things like autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders. This is immensely toxic stuff. Speaker 1: And it's a vaccine. Speaker 2: And this is what's in the vaccine. It's important to to realize we're talking about a whole range of products. Vaccines are a big one because, of course, you're directly injecting it. For example, this is tetanus vaccine. This one expires. It's a little outdated now in 02/2007. Here's the thimerosal. One to 10,000 is a preservative. Perhaps the the biggest one in The US at least that's for exposure to mercury is the influenza vaccine. Influenza vaccine is now recommended for all pregnant women, all infants, all children on a yearly basis. You're supposed to influenza? Speaker 1: Understand that thimerosal is not added at the end. It's not like, well, that factory next year can make thimerosal free. Thimerosal, you either have to have a thimerosal free factory or you have to not have one. They add thimerosal at each step because the factory is not clean and not sterile. So you either have to have an expensive sterile factory where you don't need thimerosal or you have to have one that produces thimerosal. It's gonna need thimerosal or something the whole time. It needs to be stopped. Speaker 2: This is, the influenza vaccine from Adventist Pasture, their flu zone. Thimerosal, 25. Speaker 1: I'd like to point out that a lot of people didn't know, and and I'm one of them. I've given 2,000 rogam shots. I've been in vaccines for thirty five years. I didn't know that rogam had thimerosal in it. So I think a lot of the doctors were unaware. Speaker 0: There's already confusion because this is what the video looks like on desktop. I verified and this is what it looks like in the app. It says they're all poison, every single one. So I wonder if the president or whoever runs his account know that this is on there. Regardless, it looks like this administration is really prepping the public for a big announcement about vaccines. Keep in mind, very recently, the recommendation has changed for thimerosal, so it is no longer recommended in any vaccine. However, there are other additives that people are concerned about like aluminum. Leave it at that for now, but as always, let me know your thoughts about this and make Speaker 2: sure you're Speaker 0: following me for more.

The talk traces a throughline from mid-20th century to today around nicotine products and the medical establishment, tying financial and political power to how health is marketed and regulated. - In the 1940s, Rockefeller doctors are described as being paid by tobacco companies to promote cigarette smoking. The argument then extends that tobacco companies realized they wouldn’t endure indefinitely, so they sought to keep influence by steering doctors to promote nicotine replacements—nicotine gum and nicotine patches—and they expanded into other nicotine deliveries, including inhalers and CBD products. - The narrative continues by asserting that, by 2025, pharmaceutical companies Johnson & Johnson and GSK are producing all of these nicotine products. It labels these same brands as wanting global vaccination and depopulation and claims they are run by the Rockefellers. It further asserts that another Rockefeller is involved in controlling the medical system and its connections to tobacco. - A chemical claim is raised: polysorbate eighty is found in nicotine gums, and this is described as the same chemical used in vaccines to break down the blood–brain barrier. The claim is made that polysorbate 80 is a modified neurotoxin nanoparticle used in nicotine products and ivermectin, suggesting a link between these products and broader vaccine technologies. - The speaker questions trust in doctors, noting a contrast between ongoing virus narratives and supposed alternative explanations. A claim is made that radio wave sickness has affected people since 2020 and that medical books describe viruses as being manipulated by the Rockefellers and Rothschilds. - The discussion references a recommended reading list: a book about pandemics resulting from new forms of technology and the rollout of injections, and Tom Conlin’s The Contagion Myth, which is said to debunk germs and viruses and the Rockefeller narrative. It notes this discourse traces back to the Flexner Report of 1913. - The closing sentiment frames a choice for the audience: decide whether to believe the stated lies or to move forward, with the implication that the path chosen will determine one’s understanding of health, medicine, and the role of powerful families in shaping medical narratives. In sum, the speaker weaves together claims of Rockefeller influence over doctors, tobacco and nicotine products, pharmaceutical dominance in nicotine delivery by 2025, chemical links to vaccines, alleged misinformation about viruses and “radio wave sickness,” and recommended literature that challenges mainstream germ theory and historic medical authority.

The vaccines are able to cross the blood brain barrier and move into the brain. The highest levels of aluminum found in babies are children with an autism diagnosis, and there's a direct relationship between the amount of aluminum in the brain and the diagnosis of autism. The other population with high aluminum is seniors diagnosed with dementia or Alzheimer's, and there's a direct relationship between those conditions and the amount of aluminum in brain tissue. And yet that's what's being injected into our babies. If I took those vaccine ingredients and mixed them with water and offered it, everybody would refuse, and it would be safer to drink than to inject. But when you stick a label vaccine on it, we don't exercise caution. If those ingredients were on baby food, would you give it to your baby? And the answer is no.

The speaker argues that modern childhood vaccines contain a variety of unusual and controversial ingredients. They list specific components as included in vaccines: gelatin from boiled pigskin, chicken embryo protein, blood from the hearts of cow fetuses, DNA fragments from human fetuses, oil extracted from shark livers, proteins from worm ovaries, and DNA fragments from monkey kidneys. The speaker compares this mix to a Shakespearean recipe, saying, “eye of Newt, toe of frog, lizard's leg, tongue of dog,” and evokes a mental image of Gates, Offit, and Hotez in a witch’s brew assembling these substances. They then enumerate additional ingredients in modern childhood vaccines: formaldehyde (described as bad), polysorbate 80 (linked to infertility), and potassium chloride (noting it is the chemical used in third injections in lethal injections by executioners, though acknowledging infants receive far less). The list continues with sodium borate and Triton X, described as being in spermicides, and until very recently, ethyl mercury. The speaker questions why there are so many different ingredients and references a source from a book (and a hint that ChatGPT can provide it) that purportedly explains “a kind of insane reason for each of these.” The speaker emphasizes the insistence that each ingredient has a very important purpose, countering the idea that one does not need to understand the science. They state they do not want mercury injected into their kids, using that as a personal stance against the presence of mercury in vaccines. The overall message is a strong distrust of vaccine ingredients, highlighted by vivid comparisons, lists of chemical and biological components, and a personal declaration against mercury.

Speaker 0: Ivermectin is owned by Merck. Merck created the first vaccine. Anything ivermectin, I wouldn't be touching any of that stuff. Here's the thing. If they didn't get you with the vaccine, they're getting you with ivermectin. You're still funding big pharma either way. Like, you're still giving money to big pharma. You might not be taking the vaccine, but you're giving money to pharma on the other side, which would be ivermectin. So they're getting you either way. They're putting in graphene oxide in both of those. Think about it. Like they know exactly what they're doing. It's a $30,000,000,000 business. Parasites is a $30,000,000,000 business. $30,000,000,000. They're not gonna tell you to eat some papaya seeds. They're not gonna tell you to cleanse the heavy metals. They're not gonna tell you to do a little dragon's blood or some turpentine. They're going to sell you the solution which comes with x y z side effects. Keeps big

- "This is this is thimerosal, which is labeled very toxic." - "Has cumulative effects, can cause damage to the kidneys, to the respiratory system, skin, to the nervous system." - "Specifically warns on here that it can cause reproductive and developmental toxicity, meaning that it can cause things like autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders. This is immensely toxic stuff." - "And this is what's in the vaccine." - "Vaccines are a big one because, of course, you're directly injecting it." - "the influenza vaccine is now recommended for all pregnant women, all infants, all children on a yearly basis." - "They add thimerosal at each step because the factory is not clean and not sterile." - "Thimerosal, twenty five micrograms of mercury per dose." - "They weren't aware that even the word Thimerosal meant mercury."

- Today, we're gonna hit a deep dive on parasites and propaganda by John D. Rockefeller and the connection of ivermectin and methylene blue. - It's all planned. - They use a PCR test to find out you have parasites, honestly. - Propaganda became so large that John D. Rockefeller got together with Bill and Melinda Gates and all the pharmaceutical companies to get people on dewormers. - Then it gets deeper when you find a global vaccination plan with the Rockefellers and all the same companies that are making the parasite pills. - And this is where it all ties back to methylene blue, an insecticide, a dye that's linked to CNS toxicity and was used to stain the parasites and find them. - If parasites are real, they are an indicator of heavy metal pollution.

The s v 40 sequences, they should not be there. They could have chosen another plasmid that did not have the s v 40 sequences. If these sequences sit above an oncogene and they're promiscuous, that means they are likely to integrate in places more likely than other genetic inserts. Insertional mutagenesis anyway causes cancer, and that's the risk. That's why gene therapies were not brought to market for so many years because there was a risk of causing cancer from insertional mutagenesis. We never needed these vaccines. Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, I can tell you as a toxicologist, they are not toxic. They're some of the safest drugs you can use. Endotoxin levels: they've got them all redacted. Why would you redact them if you were trying to be transparent? Why would you hold the data for seventy five years?

The speaker asserts that modern vaccines contain a wide range of ingredients sourced from animals, humans, and chemicals, and that these are used in vaccines given this morning in hospitals across America to newborns and other people. He enumerates the ingredients exactly as claimed: “The modern ingredients in your current vaccines. Oh, gelatin from boiled pig skin, just like the old one. Chicken embryo protein. Blood from the hearts of cow fetuses. Human fetus DNA. Oil extracted from shark liver. Proteins from worm ovaries, you don't want to leave that out, monkey kidney DNA fragments.” He adds a set of chemical ingredients: “That stuff I just read is in the vaccines that are given this morning in hospitals all over America to newborns and other people. Now, there's the chemical ingredients. Formaldehyde. Well, who doesn't already know that formaldehyde is not, hey, give me some formaldehyde. Everybody knows that's no good for you. Polysorbate eighty, which causes infertility. And this is my favorite one. Potassium chloride.” He calls potassium chloride his favorite because it “is the ingredient used as the third injection when we execute people by lethal injection. Right? Obviously a smaller dose for infants. I'm not claiming it's the same dose.” He continues listing: “Phenyl, borox, aluminum salts, mercury, Triton X-100, which is used in spermicides.” The speaker argues that injecting such substances into babies is unacceptable, posing a rhetorical question: “You really want to inject my baby with something that's used in spermicides? No parent would let a stranger walk up to their kid and inject them with something they don't understand.” He contends that millions of Americans do this “every time they go to CVS, every time they go to Long's Drugs,” because a 23-year-old assistant pharmacist “doesn't know what he's mixing, doesn't know what questions he's supposed to ask, figures it out, and gives your baby an injection.” He concludes that people go along with it. In addition to the ingredient list, the speaker connects potassium chloride to lethal injections and emphasizes the idea that a common pharmaceutical practice involves injecting substances with controversial associations, as part of a broader critique of vaccine contents and administration.

Rockefellers own the medical system and produce ivermectin with all their companies, trickling it down to others and selling in other countries—it's the same thing. It's a monopoly; we literally live in the game monopoly. After posting ivermectin-toxicity, viewers asked who I'm paid by, but the speaker says it's a pharmaceutical product and they are not paid by anybody. They caution that if you're still using pharmaceuticals after 2020, you should check yourself, referencing mask-wearing and sticker policies as part of what happened. Vitamins are described as synthetic, fake, and made in a lab, and peptides as made in a lab. The speaker concludes: Eat from food. That's what we're supposed to do.

The discussion centers on ivermectin and various claims about its origins, promotion, and effects. One speaker asserts that ivermectin is made by big pharma, specifically naming Merck and vaccine companies, and that people are using it because influencers told the public to take pharmaceutical pills after the pandemic, while not disclosing that cell phone towers are in front of their houses. The speaker claims that people took ivermectin instead, and states that ivermectin is linked to liver toxicity, jaundice, brain damage, and infertility, suggesting these risks are part of a broader strategy to reduce fertility in the population. The other speaker counters by describing ivermectin as having productive toxicity, noting this is observed in animal studies, including rabbits and other mammals, and rejecting the idea that its toxicity is limited to arthropods like crabs or cockroaches. This speaker claims it is a well-proven reproductive toxic substance for many mammals. They reference another video discussing the neurotoxic effect of ivermectin and mention that veterinarians discuss routine use and continued use of ivermectin, associating it with various adverse outcomes.

Speaker claims ivermectin is part of a diabolical Rockefeller plan devised in 2010, predicting people would reject vaccines after 2020 and turn to another pharmaceutical. They question ivermectin’s safety by listing side effects such as blindness, liver failure, and infertility. They argue the Rockefellers own the entire medical system worldwide, so buying from a different country is ineffective. The discussion notes ads for pharmaceuticals on alternative-health platforms, suggesting a marketing push. They say parasites are really heavy metals in the body, and that ivermectin contains heavy metals. The claim is that ivermectin, like antibiotics, suppresses symptoms. They describe a $32,000,000,000 industry fueled by this narrative, and when they researched producers, they found Merck, Johnson and Johnson, Pfizer, and Bayer. The same companies making vaccines in 2020 allegedly also make ivermectin, framing it as a bait-and-switch.

Vaccines contain various ingredients, including viruses, ethylmercury, aluminum, phenol formaldehyde, antifreeze, foreign RNA and DNA, animal DNA, and nanotechnology. These components can pass through the blood-brain barrier. The SV 40 virus, which could be deadly, was a result of undisclosed research. The scientist who discovered it, Dr. Mary Sherman, was killed, and her work was likely confiscated. The fear of germs persists, but having a strong immune system can protect against them.

The speaker claims both vaccines and ivermectin fund big pharma, starting with a "graphene oxide rabbit hole" from 2015. Manufacturers of both include Bayer, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Merck, Pfizer, and Johnson and Johnson. The speaker alleges ivermectin and injections share ingredients that break down the blood-brain barrier. The Rockefeller Foundation, funded by the Rothschilds, owns the entire medical system, according to a document removed from Google and research by Eustace Mullins. For "parasites," which are supposedly heavy metal overloads, the speaker suggests alternatives like dragon's blood, pumpkin seeds, papaya seeds, fasting, borax, baking soda, turpentine, chili shots, cilantro, wormwood, or black walnut to remove heavy metals instead of funding big pharma. The speaker believes that funding big pharma perpetuates a harmful cycle.

Speaker 0: I was talking last time about ivermectin. Well, since the Rockefellers own the medical system and they're the top dog up here and they produce the ivermectin with all their companies, which you can look into that, then what they do is they trickle them down to other companies and then they sell them in other countries. So people are like, well, well, I buy it in a different country. Guess what? It's the same thing. It's a monopoly. That's the thing. If we don't understand that these things are monopolies and that we literally live in the game monopoly, then we're just blinded. Then it's funny because I put up that video of ivermectin toxicity and people were going nuts. They were like, who who who are you paid by? And who how dare you tell people this? It's like, it's it's a pharmaceutical product. I'm not paid by anybody. It's literally just a pharmaceutical product. Like, if you're still using pharmaceuticals after 2020, you gotta check yourself. That's that's that's all I'm gonna say. Because after 2020, like, after you went through all of the things that we all went through with stepping on stickers and you people telling people to wear masks, then you gotta check yourself. That's all I'm gonna say. Vitamins, same thing, synthetic, fake, and made in a lab. And same with peptides, made in a lab. Eat from food. That's what we're supposed to do.

The speaker discusses Ivermectin, a Merck product, and its ingredients, including benzyl alcohol, glycols, and polysorbate 80, which is also used in vaccines to help heavy metals cross the blood-brain barrier. Propylene glycol, also found in antifreeze, is another ingredient. The speaker claims parasites accumulate due to heavy metal pollution, and while Ivermectin may kill the worms, it doesn't address the underlying heavy metal issue. The speaker states that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has rights to these pills. The speaker suggests using natural foods like pumpkin seeds, papaya seeds, beets, carrots, and dragon's blood to remove heavy metals from the body instead of funding Big Pharma.

The speaker traces the origins and contents of vaccines from their earliest forms to modern childhood vaccines, presenting a sequence of claimed ingredients and comparisons. - The concept of a vaccine is said to have started from the word cowpox, with the idea that “cow pus” was used. Pus from cows was rubbed into wounds on people, leading to early vaccines. - They claim that practitioners experimented for a long time with various substances, including horse pus and cow pus from an infected horse’s hoof, rubbed into people. - Early vaccines are described as being steeped for years in a mix of ox bile, glycerin, and potato slices, which the speaker notes sounds like a joke but asserts to be true. - The evolution then moves to more modern-but-old-time ingredients, listing dried rabbit spinal cords, duck embryos, chicken blood, human bile (because it shouldn’t be wasted), ground-up rat spleens, and boiled pigskin as examples of earlier vaccine components. Switching to modern day vaccines, the speaker enumerates what is said to be present in today’s childhood vaccines: - Gelatin from boiled pigskin, described as similar to the old ingredient. - Chicken embryo protein. - Blood from the hearts of cow fetuses. - DNA fragments from human fetuses. - Oil extracted from shark livers. - Proteins from worm ovaries. - DNA fragments from monkey kidneys. The speaker then invokes a Shakespearean reference to Macbeth—“eye of Newt, toe of frog, lizard’s leg, tongue of dog”—to emphasize the appearance of a witch’s brew-like mixture in the composition of vaccines, suggesting that Gates, Offit, and Hotez are “sitting around in their witch’s brew putting this stuff together.” Further modern ingredients in childhood vaccines are listed: - Formaldehyde, described as bad. - Polysorbate eighty, claimed to be linked to infertility. - Potassium chloride, called out as the chemical injected as the third injection in lethal injections by executioners, noting that infants receive far less of it than executed individuals. - Sodium borate. - Triton X. - Ethyl mercury, stated as having been used “until very recently.” The speaker concludes with a strong personal stance: “I don’t want mercury injected into my kids. Period.” They recount a memory of a broken light requiring hazmat handling for mercury, contrasting that with the alleged injection of mercury into babies, and labeling the overall situation as crazy.

Speaker 1 claims ivermectin is made by “big pharma,” specifically that it is made by Merck and “the vaccine companies.” They say people who promote ivermectin are “taking a vaccine product,” and then using it in a way that encourages others to take pharmaceutical pills during and after the pandemic. Speaker 1 describes that they “got a whole bunch of influencers on board to tell people to take pharmaceutical pills after the pandemic and during the pandemic,” and that this is done “without showing them that their cell phone tower is in front of their house,” after which people “have gone and take ivermectin instead.” Speaker 1 further states that ivermectin is “linked to liver toxicity,” listing “jaundice, brain damage, whole bunch of infertility, all that stuff.” They add that “that’s why they push it,” and that “anytime that they can make the population infertile, kinda goes hand in hand.” Speaker 0 responds by asserting that ivermectin has “productive toxicity” and that this is seen “in many different animal studies, rabbit studies, and other mammal studies.” Speaker 0 says the idea that ivermectin is “only toxic to arthropods, crabs, et cetera, cockroaches, is not true.” They say it is “a well-proven and well-known reproductive toxic substance” to “many different kinds of mammals.” Speaker 0 then mentions “the next one is another video on the neurotoxic effect of ivermectin,” and says they “know vets who talk about the routine use of ivermectin and the continual use of ivermectin resulting in all sorts of” effects.

Speaker 0 summarizes a narrative connecting vaccines and IV ivermectin to funding for big pharma, beginning with a supposed graphene oxide rabbit hole dating back to February 2015. The speaker lists manufacturers associated with these products: Bayer, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Merck, Pfizer, and Johnson & Johnson, noting familiarity with these brands from 2020. The speaker highlights a date associated with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and claims that the foundation is linked to the discussed issue. The argument continues by pointing to ingredients claimed to be common between injections and pills, described as the same substances used to break down the blood-brain barrier, and asserts that these ingredients poison people. The speaker poses the question of who planned all of this and asserts that the Rockefeller Foundation funds, and is funded by, the Rothschilds, owning the entire medical system. A referenced document is said to have been removed from Google, and the claim is reinforced by referencing Eustace Mullins as providing deeper detail on the topic. In addressing solutions, the speaker shifts to concerns about heavy metal overload and parasites, offering a list of remedies: dragon’s blood, pumpkin seeds, papaya seeds, fasting, borax, baking soda, turpentine from the pine tree, a chili shot, cilantro, wormwood, and black walnut. The recommended approach is to pull heavy metals out rather than continuing to fund big pharma, with the speaker suggesting that the cycle benefits all sides and may perpetuate itself if unaddressed.

The speaker discusses the vaccine and IV mectin, claiming both fund big pharma. They allege a connection to a "graphene oxide rabbit hole" dating back to 2015. Manufacturers like Bayer, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Merck, Pfizer, and Johnson & Johnson are mentioned. The speaker claims IV mectin and injections share the same ingredients, which allegedly break down the blood-brain barrier. They state the Rockefeller Foundation, funded by the Rothschilds, owns the entire medical system, referencing a document removed from Google and a book by Eustace Mullins. The speaker suggests that parasites are actually heavy metal overloads and recommends solutions like dragon's blood, pumpkin seeds, papaya seeds, fasting, borax, baking soda, turpentine, chili shots, cilantro, wormwood, or black walnut to remove heavy metals instead of funding big pharma.

I've recently learned about the push for early COVID-19 treatments, particularly Ivermectin, which I initially thought was beneficial. However, I've discovered that it may be a harmful fertility toxin, affecting conception and fetal development. This raises questions about the motives behind its promotion. Additionally, many supplements marketed for health may actually hinder the body's ability to eliminate Ivermectin, creating dangerous drug interactions. This suggests a troubling connection between these products and the ongoing health crisis. It's essential to be cautious with pharmaceutical products and supplements, as the implications could be significant.

An unvaccinated man experienced symptoms after being intimate with a vaccinated woman due to vaccine shedding. He took nattokinase, bromelain, curcumin, and eventually Ivermectin to alleviate the symptoms, feeling 100% better after taking Ivermectin. The difficulty in accessing Ivermectin indicates intentional harm.

Speaker 0 discusses the idea that doctors will say a preservative-free form is not necessarily safe. The claim is that a preservative-free label does not guarantee safety. The discussion then focuses on Polysorbate eighty (Polysorbate 80). It is stated that there are ten milligrams of Polysorbate eighty in the preparation being discussed. Polysorbate eighty is described as being used in research studies, particularly in cancer research for brain cancer drugs, because it is used to compare the drug with Polysorbate eighty and because it “opens up the blood brain barrier” which helps the drug get into the brain. The speaker asserts that Polysorbate eighty does the same thing when administered to babies, enabling the blood-brain barrier to be opened, and then, immediately after that, the hepatitis B vaccine is given with two hundred fifty micrograms of aluminum. The aluminum is said to have access to the brain immediately because of the Polysorbate eighty that is in the vitamin K shot. The speaker references a 2016 statement of concern about Gardasil, noting that Gardasil injections at that time contained fifty micrograms of Polysorbate eighty, and there was concern about polysorbate eighty causing premature ovarian failure. The claim is that polygsorbate eighty is used in clinical studies to induce infertility. The discussion then contrasts the amounts: when the vitamin K shot is injected, Amphastar has ten milligrams of Polysorbate eighty. So the concern is that there is a comparison between fifty micrograms in Gardasil and ten milligrams (which is two hundred times that amount). This discrepancy raises the question posed by the speaker: is the vitamin K shot a factor in the infertility problems that are claimed to be occurring in young people today?