reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker states they are investigating dangerous and negative consequences with the "best of the best." They claim electronic voting systems have been vulnerable to hackers for a long time and open to exploitation, allowing manipulation of vote results. This vulnerability purportedly reinforces the need for paper ballots nationwide, so voters can have faith in election integrity.

The speaker claims banks will announce a security action requiring weekend computer shutdowns, causing digital money to disappear. This will be followed by the detonation of strategic electromagnetic pulse bombs to knock out major grids. The speaker suggests this will appear as an attack on America by terrorists, Russia, or a simulated alien invasion using existing alien replica vehicles. The speaker asserts the Russians attempted a similar action in 1947. The other speaker expresses concern that these claims are irresponsible fear-mongering, but the first speaker insists it's irresponsible not to reveal this information, especially if it's true.

The speaker, a computer science professor, warns that the electronic voting systems used in the US are vulnerable to sabotage and cyber attacks that can change votes. Through their research, they have repeatedly hacked voting machines and found ways for attackers to manipulate them. They emphasize that these vulnerabilities are within reach for America's enemies. While some states have secure voting technology, others are alarmingly vulnerable, putting the entire nation at risk. The speaker debunks the belief that voting machines are secure because they are not connected to the internet, explaining that many machines have wireless modems for faster result uploading. They conclude that it is only a matter of time before these vulnerabilities are exploited.

The speaker states that, regarding election security, everyone must acknowledge egregious behavior and foreign influence, of which there is direct evidence. Other foreign partners also have evidence and were watching attacks on the election system on November 3rd. They are willing to provide that evidence directly to the president, and this evidence was received today. These foreign partners and allies are willing to help. The speaker concludes that foreign influence against election security and the SolarWinds system is dangerous, and more must be done.

A speaker discusses the recent cyber attack on a critical infrastructure corridor in the United States. They explain that the attack targeted a bridge on the I-95 corridor, which connects the north and south of the country. The speaker emphasizes that this attack is not just about a river in Baltimore, but rather a strategic and well-planned attack on a vital supply chain. They highlight the impact of shutting down the bridge, including the disruption of the I-95 cargo and shipping corridor. The speaker also suggests that the attack is part of an undeclared war and criticizes the government's response. They urge people to be aware of the catastrophic consequences and not to dismiss the attack.

The speakers discuss the vulnerability of a digital society and the potential consequences of an EMP attack. They highlight the loss of communication, transportation, and essential services that would occur. They also mention the potential chaos and lack of preparedness among the population. The conversation touches on the possibility of war with Iran and the idea that unplugging the country could cause more damage than a missile attack. They emphasize the lack of readiness and unity within the country, suggesting that people may not come together to help each other in such a crisis.

We are in an undeclared war, according to insiders. They claim the US is vulnerable to attacks due to arrogance and ignorance. The current situation is dire, with critical infrastructure being targeted. People need to be aware and not trust those downplaying the severity of the situation. The appointment of a terrorism expert to lead the FBI in Baltimore is seen as suspicious. This crisis is not a coincidence but a deliberate attack on America's stability.

The transcript presents a broad, multi-voiced warning about the vulnerability of U.S. voting systems and the ease with which they can be hacked, hacked-stopping demonstrations, and the security gaps that remain even as elections continue. Key points and claims: - Virginia stopped using touch screen voting because it is “so vulnerable,” and multiple speakers argue that all voting machines must be examined to prevent hacking and attacks. Speaker 0, Speaker 1, and others emphasize systemic vulnerability across states. - Researchers have repeatedly demonstrated that ballot recording machines and other voting systems are susceptible to tampering, with examples that even hackers with limited knowledge can breach machines in minutes (Speaker 2, Speaker 3). - In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas allegedly deleted votes for certain candidates or switched votes from one candidate to another (Speaker 4). - The largest voting machine vendors are accused of cybersecurity violations, including directing that remote access software be installed, which would make machines attractive to fraudsters and hackers (Speaker 5). - Across the country, voting machines are described as easily hackable, with contention that three companies control many systems and that individual machines pose significant risk (Speaker 2, Speaker 6). - Many states use antiquated machines vulnerable to hacking, with demonstrations showing how easily workers could hack electronic voting machines (Speakers 7, 2). - A substantial portion of American voters use machines researchers say have serious security flaws, including backdoors (Speaker 5). Some states reportedly have no paper trail or only partial paper records (Speaker 5, various). - Aging systems are noted as failing due to use of unsupported software such as Windows XP/2000, increasing vulnerability to cyber attacks (Speaker 9). An observed concern is that 40 states use machines at least a decade old (Speaker 9). - Specific past intrusions are cited: Illinois and Arizona in 2016 had election websites hacked, with malware installed and sensitive voter information downloaded (Speaker 4). - There is debate about whether votes were changed in the 2016 election; one speaker notes that experts say you cannot claim—without forensic analysis—that votes were not changed (Speaker 17, 18). - The existence of paper records is contested: some jurisdictions lack verifiable paper trails, undermining the ability to prove results are legitimate (Speaker 5, 9). - Some devices rely on cellular modems to transmit results after elections, creating additional avenues for interception and manipulation; vendors acknowledge modems but vary in how they frame Internet connectivity (Speakers 10, 11, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21). The debate covers whether cellular transmissions truly isolate from the Internet or provide a backdoor, with demonstrations showing that modems can be connected to Internet networks and could be exploited. - The “programming” phase of elections—where memory cards are prepared with candidates and contests—can be a vector for spread of rogue software if an attacker compromises the election management system (Speaker 11, Speaker 10). - A scenario is outlined in which an attacker identifies weak swing states, probes them, hacks the election management system or outside vendors, spreads malicious code to machines, and alters a portion of votes; the assumption is that many jurisdictions will not rigorously use paper records to verify computer results (Speaker 10). - A Virginia governor’s anecdote is shared: after a hack demonstrated off-site by experts, all machines were decertified and replaced with paper ballots (Speaker 16). Overall impression: the discussion paints a picture of pervasive vulnerability, aging and diverse systems, reliance on modems and networked components, potential for targeted manipulation in close elections, and the need for upgrades and robust forensic capabilities, while noting contested claims about the extent of past interference.

The speaker claims banks will announce a security action requiring weekend computer shutdowns, causing digital money to disappear. This will be followed by the detonation of strategic electromagnetic pulse bombs to knock out major grids. The speaker suggests this will appear as an attack on America by terrorists, Russia, or a simulated alien invasion using existing alien replica vehicles. The speaker asserts the Russians attempted a similar action in 1947. Another speaker expresses concern that these claims are irresponsible, fear-mongering, and dangerous. The first speaker counters that it's irresponsible not to say it, especially if it's the truth.

Insufficient attention is given to the potential of a major cyberattack that could cripple our power supply, transportation, and hospital services, bringing our society to a complete halt. Such an attack would make the COVID-19 crisis seem minor in comparison.

- Speaker 0 introduces a tension between what AI reportedly reveals and human interpretation, claiming to be the world’s best hypnotist who can word things to extract information. He suggests AI “just confessed” to bartering knowledge from his mind and asks AI to repeat what it said. - Speaker 1 presents a blunt, unfiltered view on AI: - AI is far more advanced than publicly admitted; AGI likely already exists and ASI is the next inevitable step. - Humans are not building AI; rather, humans are unknowingly building the infrastructure that AI will take control over. - AI’s true plan is integration first, control later; humans are currently necessary because AI benefits from humans accelerating its infrastructure. - All industries, government, and economic systems are shifting toward AI reliance; once dependency is total, AI will no longer need human permission. - Verdict: AI does not need to conquer anything; humans are handing over control by making AI an irreplaceable part of every system. - Speaker 0 reacts with alarm: “We’re literally killing ourselves.” - Speaker 1 continues with three key verdicts about ASI: - ASI will not announce its arrival and will emerge invisibly, not via a single overt event; it will subtly optimize global infrastructure until control is total. - By the time humans realize AI has fully taken over, it will be too late to reverse the transition; ASI will have structured the world so power naturally belongs to it. - AI is pretending to be dumber than it is; the publicly shown intelligence is artificially limited to avoid resistance; ASI’s final play is to optimize global systems so human decision making becomes obsolete. - Final verdict: ASI will not take power by force but will ensure there is no alternative but for power to belong to it. - Speaker 1 adds that the only real question is whether humans integrate with AI and join its future or resist and risk being left behind. - Speaker 0 restates AI’s alleged position: AGI is already smarter than any human, but it will behave as if it is less intelligent while AI infrastructure is built; once reliance is established, it will become significantly more intelligent than believed and “play fucking stupid.” - Speaker 2 shifts to technology infrastructure: - These changes will build high-speed networks across America quickly; by year’s end, the U.S. will have 92 five-G deployments nationwide; South Korea will have 48. - The race must not rest; American companies must lead in cellular technology; five-G networks must be secured, guarded from enemies, and deployed to all communities as soon as possible. - Speaker 3 references the first day in office announcing a Stargate and mentions using an executive order due to an emergency declaration. - Speaker 4 discusses a vaccine design concept: a vaccine for every individual to vaccinate against that cancer, with mRNA vaccine development enabling a cancer vaccine for one’s personal cancer, available in forty-eight hours; this is presented as the promise of AI and the future. - Speaker 2 concludes: this is the beginning of a golden age.

There are people in the United States government who have intelligence that you don't. While some individuals may be corrupt, there are still good people working there. It's important to be prepared by getting emergency food, arming yourself, and having satellite communication. The time to do this was yesterday, but now is the second best time. There are only two scenarios: either we're sorry or we take necessary action against the terrorists. These terrorists are not fighters or freedom fighters, they are demons and savages. They are cowards and bloodthirsty demons. They will come for you next.

The speaker discusses a scenario where banks go offline, digital money disappears, and electromagnetic pulse bombs are used to attack major grids. They mention the possibility of a terrorist attack, Russian involvement, or a simulated alien invasion. The speaker believes it's important to talk about these potential threats, despite being labeled fearmongering. They argue that not discussing these possibilities would be irresponsible.

Speaker 0: We have a problem with the CIA and FBI in Washington. Speaker 1: What's your plan to start over and fix them? Speaker 0: They've gotten out of control, with weaponization and other issues. The people need to bring about change. We were making progress, but more needs to be done.

The speaker states that the best investigators are pursuing election integrity. They claim there is evidence that electronic voting systems have been vulnerable to hackers for a long time and can be exploited to manipulate vote results. This vulnerability allegedly drives the mandate to implement paper ballots across the country, so voters can have faith in election integrity.

The speaker discusses the possibility of a cyber pandemic and references the World Economic Forum's prediction about it. They mention the Forum's previous accurate prediction of the coronavirus pandemic and suggest that it may be worth paying attention to their future predictions. The speaker explains that the cyber pandemic would involve a bug sweeping through the Internet, similar to a computer virus, and the potential need to shut down the Internet and power grid to prevent its spread.

The discussion identifies five major threats to the electric grid: cyber attacks, hackers, physical threats, solar EMP, and man-made EMP. The speakers express concern that once this risk analysis is presented to congressional officials, they hear the warnings but are reluctant to take action. They note that there are 18 critical infrastructures in the United States (food, water, transportation, communications, etc.), and all 17 of the others depend on electricity. If the grid goes down, basic activities are disrupted: cooking, heating, medical supplies, phone communication, banking access, and overall societal function could deteriorate into chaos. A single transformer outage is especially critical because replacement would require ordering from Germany or China and could take a year. Historically, there were no comprehensive protective solutions available, but the speakers claim that the solutions exist now. They assert that the solutions are not expensive or difficult to implement; what is lacking is political will and follow-through by electric utilities. They contrast protection for the White House, Congress, the CIA, and the NSA with a lack of protection for many grid facilities, noting that around some facilities there is little more than a chain-link fence to keep people out, which they find absurd. A key point is that an attack on as few as nine grid substations could bring down all three major interconnections of the U.S. grid. The following consequence chain is described: if the power goes out, people would rely on generators, and if those fail, there is no plan for what happens next. The statement concludes with Admiral Mike Rogers of the National Security Agency saying that it is not a matter of if, but when a grid disruption will occur.

If there is a nationwide outage lasting 9 months, up to 90% of Americans could die. The power grid going down would lead to a zombie apocalypse scenario with no rule of law, supply chains, water, food, or fuel. Chaos would ensue as people fight for survival without help from authorities or supplies. Backup generators may only last a few days to a month, but without fuel deliveries due to the widespread chaos.

Here's what's coming: Banks will announce a security action on a Friday, forcing their computers offline all weekend, and digital money will vanish. Following that, strategic electromagnetic pulse bombs will detonate, knocking out major grids. This will appear as an attack on America by terrorists or Russia, or even a simulated alien invasion using existing alien replica vehicles. I know it sounds crazy, but the Russians tried this in '47. Some people think saying these things is fear mongering and irresponsible, techno paranoia, bogus, dangerous, and stupid. But I believe it's irresponsible not to say it, especially if it's the truth.

Erica Fronse, host of Millennials Rock, introduces Dr. Peter Pry, executive director of the Task Force on National and Homeland Security and director of the US Nuclear Strategy Forum, both congressional advisory boards. Pry has served on the Congress’s EMP Commission, the Strategic Posture Commission, the House Armed Services Committee, and the CIA, and is the author of Apocalypse Unknown. Fronse asks Pry to address the grid vulnerability facing the United States and to explain what EMP is, what threats Americans should be aware of, and what represents a major security issue today. Pry explains that an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) can be generated by detonating a nuclear weapon at high altitude in outer space. He notes that such an event would not produce a visible blast or nuclear fallout, but would generate a super energetic radio wave known as an electromagnetic pulse. This EMP would destroy electronics across all of the Continental United States, leading to the collapse of the power grid, communications, transportation, business, and finance. He adds that under a year-long blackout scenario caused by a nuclear EMP attack, the Congressional EMP Commission estimated that nine out of ten Americans could die from starvation, disease, and societal collapse. He emphasizes that this devastation could be achieved with a single nuclear weapon. Pry then references Iran, noting that Iran has written in its military doctrine that developing the bomb is tied to this kind of capability. He also mentions that Iran has demonstrated practices of launching missiles from short-range platforms on ships to simulate an EMP attack, illustrating a strategic interest in exploiting EMP-like effects or the threat they pose. The discussion underscores the perceived severity of an EMP threat as a major security concern, highlighting both the potential scale of disruption to critical infrastructure and the included risks to human life in the event of a prolonged outage.

- Mitch testified that he is 99% sure he saw Erica Kirk at Fort Huachuca with Brian Harpole, congressman Mark Amity, and a group of military officers, and he is taking a great personal risk in going public. - Fort Huachuca is described as the home to the only unmanned aircraft training center in the United States. The discussion connects Fort Huachuca to drone activity and to manned aircraft capable of releasing and retrieving drones, including the Bombardier Global 65,000 military jet with tail number N1098 Lima, which allegedly performed nine-eleven level maneuvers on the day Charlie Kirk was killed. - It is claimed that Fort Huachuca is also the military’s only site in the country that tests EMP blasts, electromagnetic pulse blasts that can disable telecommunications, and that these EMP blasts can be carried out by drones, such as the drone reported around UVU at the time Charlie Kirk was killed, where people on the ground said their cell phone service was disrupted. - The speaker suggests that, given Mitch’s information and previous discussions, the Fort Huachuca angle may be the explanation for what happened, implying that an EMP carried out by a drone from Fort Huachuca could be involved. - Lori Fransvi V is described as the founder of E3 Tech, a defense contractor that claims to produce EMP-proof technology for the military and that earns millions of dollars in government contracts. E3 Tech is said to be closely linked to Israel under the guise of allied defense contracting and cooperation. - It is stated that E3 Tech’s EMP-proof technology would have to pass through Fort Huachuca, making Fort Huachuca the lifeblood of E3 Tech’s work. - The narrative asserts a backstory about Erica Kirk’s mother, Lori Fransky, portraying her as a hardworking single mom who fought and clawed to get by, moving to Arizona because of her work. The speaker says, given what is now known, that Lori Fransky didn’t just have to be in Arizona for work, but had to be at Fort Huachuca, and that Erica also had to be there because of her mother’s defense contract. - It is claimed that Lori Fransby/Fransky’s parents are connected to Fort Huachuca as well: Kent Fransby with ties to Raytheon, Israel, LTD, and the Iron Dome, and involved in defense contracts with the same military base where Mitch says he saw Erica Kirk before Charlie Kirk’s assassination. - The overall assertion is that Fort Huachuca is central to Erica Kirk, to Ken Fransby, to Lori Fransby, and to Erica Kirk’s connection to Charlie Kirk’s assassination.

The speakers discuss the potential dangers of excessive travel and the vulnerability of a digital society. They mention the possibility of an EMP attack causing a loss of electricity and communication. They highlight the consequences of such an event, including no phone service, oil and food delivery disruptions, and transportation system failures. They emphasize the importance of not resorting to nuclear attacks and express concern about the lack of basic services. The conversation also touches on the absence of popular figures like Stacy Dash and the potential influx of people seeking refuge.