reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The FDA, NIH, and CDC recommended vaccinating pregnant women at any time, leading to a rise in maternal mortality. A recent paper showed a concerning increase in maternal deaths in the US, erasing decades of progress in obstetrics. Pregnant women are dying with no mention of COVID or vaccines in the report. This alarming trend should be a cause for concern for everyone.

- First, HHS will act on acetaminophen. - The FDA is responding to clinical and laboratory studies that suggest a potential association between acetaminophen used during pregnancy and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes including later diagnosis for ADHD and autism. - We have also evaluated the contrary studies that show no association. - HHS will launch a nationwide public service campaign to inform families and protect public health. - HHS wants therefore to encourage clinicians to exercise their best judgment and use of acetaminophen for fevers and pain in pregnancy by prescribing the lowest effective dose for the shortest necessary duration and only when treatment is required. - Some studies have also found the use of acetaminophen in children can potentially prolong viral illnesses. - FDA will drive new research to safeguard mothers, children, families.

For every 10,000 people given a mammogram, eight will die who wouldn't have from breast cancer. There is a 52% overdiagnosis rate with mammography, meaning many are treated unnecessarily. Safer options include ultrasound, which is definitive and radiation-free, and thermograms to detect metabolic activity. The speaker questions why annual mammograms are recommended, especially for those with dense breast tissue, as radiation from mammograms can cause cancer. A Cochrane review showed a zero net effectiveness rating for mammograms in node-positive cancers. The speaker suggests ultrasound and thermograms should be the standard.

This transcript centers on Erica Kirk’s family, focusing on her mother Loretta Fransby, who is also referred to as Mama Lowe. The speakers discuss her family and the public interest around Erica Kirk’s pregnancy. The conversation includes a claim that there has been a lot of talk about whether the woman in question has truly ever been pregnant, with one speaker asserting, “I’ve been pregnant five times. The first was a miscarriage, gave birth to four, so you bet your ass I zoomed in on that ultrasound screen.” The speaker notes a close-up of the ultrasound image and reveals that they conducted a deep dive into the stages of pregnancy, even though they had limited technology to zoom in on the original image. The speaker explains that based on the stomach size and what is visible, it would be safe to presume the ultrasound shown is a viability ultrasound, which determines if there is a heartbeat and can be performed as early as six weeks. They describe what a six-week ultrasound looks like versus an eight-week ultrasound, and mention that they wanted to compare those visuals to Erica Kirk’s ultrasound but could not zoom in on the provided image due to a lack of technology, describing the effort as a two-hour waste. The speaker adds that they learned at nine weeks babies hiccup—though hiccups do not produce sound. The discussion also touches on the significance of ultrasound appointments, noting that they are a big deal. They point out that Charlie is not seen in the video, though he could be behind the camera, and that the original audio was dubbed over, making it unclear whether there was any interaction. The speakers compare the situation to scenes often depicted in romantic comedies, where a partner’s absence from doctor appointments is a source of tension. The closing remark imagines Erica becoming angry if her partner, Charlie, misses an appointment, emphasizing “Those eyes!” as a reaction. In sum, the transcript covers: the family context around Erica Kirk and Loretta Fransby, public speculation about Erica’s pregnancy, a self-claimed deep dive into ultrasound timelines (six to nine weeks, including the fact that nine weeks can involve hiccups), the importance of ultrasound appointments, and the mystery surrounding Charlie’s presence in the video.

For every 10,000 people given a mammogram, eight will die who wouldn't have from breast cancer. There's a 52% overdiagnosis rate with mammography, meaning many are treated unnecessarily. Ultrasound is definitive and avoids radiation. Thermograms detect metabolic activity and blood flow, followed by ultrasound if needed. Mammogram radiation can cause breast cancer, especially in those with dense tissue. A Cochrane review showed zero net effectiveness for mammograms in node-positive cancer cases versus controls. Ultrasound and thermograms should be the standard.

A CNN investigation reveals growing concern among scientists and government officials that ultrasound may not be entirely harmless and is potentially overused on pregnant women. They fear possible genetic damage to the fetus, potentially leading to cancer and subtle birth defects that might not appear for years. Geneticist Dr. Arthur Bloom notes early studies suggest diagnostic levels of ultrasound can damage human and rodent cells. Radiologist Dr. Doreen Rebiskind's research shows ultrasound exposure causes abnormal changes in cells, behaving similarly to cells damaged by X-rays. FDA officials admit they cannot definitively say diagnostic ultrasound during pregnancy is safe. An FDA study indicates that children exposed to ultrasound in utero have reduced birth weights. Experts suggest ultrasound should not be used for routine monitoring of low-risk pregnancies. Dr. Bloom estimates that over a million women receive unnecessary ultrasounds. There is concern that subjecting a female fetus to ultrasound near term could affect not only her cells but also all her eggs for the next generation. Ultrasound is used in scans, Doppler fetal monitors, and electronic fetal monitors. No controlled studies exist on the long-term effects of ultrasound on human development.

There's no such thing as biopsy spreading cancer. They say that out loud, but they have not even one scientific study to show for that, whereas I have 50 to show that they do spread cancer. They just believe so strongly and so blindly what they were told, and they're afraid of the truth because it means that for years and years and years, doctors have been killing people through biopsies. Be very careful. Never do a prostate biopsy. Never do a breast biopsy. There are better ways. You don't need the mammogram with its own radiation. You don't need biopsy to tell you if it's cancer or not. You can be 99% sure just by doing an ultrasound with a technician who knows what she is doing.

CDC child death records are presented as showing catastrophic transgenerational harm linked to mRNA vaccination programs. An analysis of CDC data by Ethical Skeptic reports a seventy seven percent excess in deaths among children born after mothers received mRNA vaccines, equating to nearly eighteen thousand additional deaths in ages zero to four since 2021. The data also show an inflection after thirty years of decline in infant and child mortality, with curve reversing in 2021. The report identifies two signals: teratogenic effects, including rising infant deaths exposed in utero, and transgenerational effects, with sustained excess mortality in children who were never infected or vaccinated but whose parents were. The excess deaths affect multiple systems—cardiopulmonary, renal, neurological, congenital, septic causes—similar disruptions seen in injected adults. The findings are described as not speculative models but derived from government records. If confirmed, the situation would constitute a historic health crisis affecting future generations.

I have 43 years of experience in high-risk obstetrics, seeing a large number of patients yearly. Stillbirth rates have decreased from 10 to nearly 6 in my career. In 2021, stillbirth rates for fetuses are alarming, with a rate of 29.3, indicating a significant deviation. Instances of stillbirths and fetal abnormalities are on the rise, possibly linked to the inflammatory effects of vaccines. Safety monitoring systems have not identified increased risks for pregnant individuals receiving vaccines. Inflammation in pregnancy can lead to harm, as known for decades.

According to the speaker, mammograms cause harm, killing eight people out of every 10,000 screened who would not have died from breast cancer otherwise. The speaker claims there is a 52% overdiagnosis rate with mammography, leading to unnecessary treatment. They suggest ultrasound, which they say is definitive and radiation-free, and thermography as safer alternatives. Thermography detects metabolic activity and blood flow, followed by ultrasound if needed. The speaker questions the yearly recommendation of mammograms, especially for women with dense breast tissue, because the radiation may cause cancer. They cite a Cochrane review indicating zero net effectiveness for mammogram screenings in node-positive cancers. The speaker recommends ultrasound and thermogram as the standard.

I have 43 years of experience in high-risk obstetrics, seeing a large number of patients yearly. Stillbirth rates have decreased from 10 to 5.8-6 per 1,000 live births. In 2021, the stillbirth rate for fetuses is alarming at 29.3 per 1,000. Reports from Waterloo, Canada show 83 stillbirths out of 4,000 deliveries, with 13 dead fetuses in a 24-hour period. Vaccines are linked to inflammatory effects causing fetal harm. Safety monitoring systems found no significant risks for pregnant women. Inflammation in pregnancy can lead to damage, injury, and death, a known fact for decades.

Speaker 1 discusses important findings from autism research that families should know when making decisions. The FDA will act on acetaminophen use during pregnancy, with the FDA responding to clinical and laboratory studies that suggest a potential association between acetaminophen used during pregnancy and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes, including later diagnosis of ADHD and autism. Scientists have proposed biological mechanisms linking prenatal acetaminophen exposure to altered brain development, and the FDA has evaluated contrary studies that show no association. Today, the FDA will issue a physician’s notice about the risk of acetaminophen during pregnancy and begin the process to initiate a safety label change. HHS will launch a nationwide public service campaign to inform families and protect public health. The FDA recognizes that acetaminophen is often the only tool for fevers and pain in pregnancy, as other alternatives have well-documented adverse effects. HHS encourages clinicians to exercise their best judgment and use acetaminophen for fevers and pain in pregnancy by prescribing the lowest effective dose for the shortest necessary duration and only when treatment is required. Thanks to politicization of science, the safety of acetaminophen against the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in young children has never been validated. Prudent medicine therefore suggests caution with acetaminophen use by young children, given that strong evidence also associates it with liver toxicity. Some studies have found that use of acetaminophen in children can potentially prolong viral illnesses. The FDA will drive new research to safeguard mothers, children, and families. In addition to a possible acetaminophen connection to autism for pregnant women, infants, and toddlers, the research has revealed that folate deficiency in a child’s brain can lead to autism. There are also other confirmation studies. One finding cited is that two studies show children who are circumcised early have double the rate of autism, highly likely because they’re given Tylenol. The speaker notes that none of this is positive, but it is information that should be paid attention to. Speaker 0 comments that there is a tremendous amount of proof or evidence, though he is not a doctor, and that he studied this a long time ago.

Doctors administered untested gene therapy to infants, toddlers, and pregnant women, claiming it was safe. However, the mRNA jab was deemed the most dangerous medical product for pregnant individuals. Traditional medical principles were disregarded, including giving experimental drugs to pregnant patients and assuming any death or injury post-intervention was related. Regulatory authorities worldwide dismissed adverse events as unrelated until proven otherwise, leading to disastrous consequences.

Speaker 0 explains that even the obstetrics and gynecology association has reportedly pushed to vaccinate pregnant women as a duty, but doctors are the ones who do not know the facts. They reference a highly regarded medical journal, the New England Journal of Medicine, which published a study claiming a 12.6 percent user rate for the vaccine’s research results. Based on that paper, the 三 富 士 川 学 会 then attempted to vaccinate pregnant women. In reality, among the 827 individuals involved, 700 were in the postpartum period, 127 were in the antepartum period, and initial data were from that group. Specifically, for the group limited to those under twenty weeks (twenty weeks or less), which is 127 people, the miscarriage rate was 82 percent. Therefore, the argument is that, going forward, one can see how dangerous the vaccine is from those numbers. The speaker contends that data were hidden and later mixed into the 700-person postpartum group, yielding a miscarriage rate of 12.6 percent. Because of this, the claim is that even a leading medical journal has been influenced by money to publish such conclusions. Overall, the points presented are: - The obstetrics field is described as advocating vaccination of pregnant women as a duty, while physicians allegedly lack awareness of the underlying facts. - The NEJM published a study deemed to show a 12.6 percent user rate, which the speaker implies is problematic. - The 三 富 士 川 学 会 vaccinated pregnant women, but the data show that among 127 women under twenty weeks, the miscarriage rate was 82 percent. - The speaker asserts that this information was hidden and later combined with data from the 700 postpartum cases to produce a 12.6 percent miscarriage rate. - The implication is that even a top medical journal can be swayed by financial influence, resulting in biased reporting.

There is growing concern that ultrasound may not be entirely harmless. Some studies suggest that diagnostic levels of ultrasound can cause genetic damage and abnormal cell behavior. While experts have no evidence of harm to human fetuses, they advise caution and limited use of ultrasound until more is known. The FDA has conducted research on ultrasound and found that it may lead to low birth weight in babies. However, some experts believe that warnings about ultrasound are unnecessary and may cause unnecessary fear. Overuse of ultrasound is also a concern, with more than 50% of pregnant women receiving it, even when not medically necessary. Until more is known, it is recommended to use ultrasound sparingly to avoid potential long-term genetic effects.

New pregnant women often consider ultrasound scans, which use high-frequency sound waves to create images of the fetus. While doctors generally deem ultrasound safe, concerns are emerging about potential long-term risks, including genetic damage and low birth weight. Some studies suggest ultrasound may cause subtle birth defects and affect fetal development, although no overt malformations have been detected. Experts urge caution, noting that ultrasound is often overused, with many low-risk pregnancies receiving scans unnecessarily. The FDA acknowledges it cannot guarantee ultrasound safety, and ongoing research is needed to understand its effects on human fetuses. Overall, while ultrasound is a valuable tool, its routine use should be reconsidered until more is known about its long-term implications.

I have decades of experience in high-risk obstetrics and have seen a rise in stillbirth rates, with some cases showing alarming numbers of fetal deaths and complications. The vaccine has been linked to inflammatory effects that can harm pregnancies. Despite safety monitoring systems finding no significant risks, inflammation in pregnancy can lead to serious consequences.

They literally went into the rooms. They went into these babies' rooms, in over 50 households. They literally measured the physical EMF radiation that was in the babies' rooms. That accounts for smart TVs, baby monitors, cellular tower distance, and Wi-Fi. All this stuff combined contributes to this total EMF load here. And those babies who were in the high EMF rooms, high EMF households suffered triple increased risks of neurodevelopmental disorders, and they accounted for below birth rate. So this wasn't because they were born too early. They accounted for income. It wasn't because, you know, they had a lot of money and a lot of, you know, going to the doctors often and getting screened. It appeared because it was due to these little babies that are just developing, getting bombarded with artificial electromagnetic radiation, which appears to be influencing their development process.

The speaker discusses her miscarriage, which occurred two to four hours after an ultrasound at five and a half to six weeks of pregnancy. An RN told her she was the sixth person recently to miscarry after an ultrasound. Research led her to a study where pregnant women received two or more ultrasound scans. One study divided over 9,000 women into two groups. The first group received an ultrasound scan between sixteen and twenty weeks, and the second group received no ultrasound scan. The results showed 20 miscarriages in the first ultrasound group and none in the second group. She believes ultrasounds are not worth the risk, and that many times, if a scan sees something wrong, babies are born completely normal anyway. She advises being patient and trusting baby movement. She encourages viewers to consider not getting ultrasounds or using Dopplers, and to check out the links she listed below.

Pfizer documents show an 80% miscarriage rate in pregnant women. 236 out of 270 records were lost. Babies in utero were exposed to the vaccine, leading to deaths. Breast milk was poisoned by vaccine components, causing convulsions and deaths. Newborns may have air sacs between lungs and chest walls, leading to respiratory distress. Pfizer knew about this issue 2 years prior.

829 pregnant women were given radioactive iron under the guise of vitamin treatment to aid their babies, as part of a study at Vanderbilt University after World War II. The researchers aimed to investigate how quickly radioiodine crossed the placenta. Unfortunately, many of these women suffered from various health issues, including skin diseases and cancers, and some of their children developed rare cancers and died at young ages. There were no whistleblowers among the medical staff; the doctors maintained that the research was valuable for national interests. Notably, four fatal malignancies were found in the children of the exposed mothers, while none occurred in the unexposed group.

Biopsies spread cancer, and there are 50 scientific studies to prove it. Doctors have been killing people for years through biopsies, but they blame the cancer instead of the metastasis caused by the biopsy. Therefore, one should never do a prostate or breast biopsy. There are better ways to determine if it's cancer. Mammograms are unnecessary because of their radiation. An ultrasound with a skilled technician can provide 99% certainty.

In the past, obstetrics has seen a series of interventions with harmful consequences. X-rays were used in the 1930s to measure pelvises, but they were later found to cause cancer in babies. In the 1950s and 1960s, a drug called Thalidomide resulted in babies being born without limbs. In the 1990s, the use of Cytotek to induce labor in women with previous caesareans led to numerous ruptured uteruses and deaths of babies. Unfortunately, there hasn't been enough careful study of the long-term effects of these interventions in obstetric practice. To ensure a more humanized birth experience, it may be best to explore alternative options.

Pregnant women who received COVID-19 shots experienced concerning effects, according to maternal fetal medicine expert Dr. Against Thorpe. The shots quickly spread throughout the body, crossing barriers like the placenta and blood-brain barriers in both the mother and fetus. Compared to the flu vaccine, COVID-19 shots led to more adverse events in women of reproductive age. Data showed a 27-fold higher risk of miscarriage and over twice the risk of negative fetal outcomes across six categories. Additionally, birth rates in several European countries dropped significantly after widespread COVID-19 vaccination. As a result, researchers are urging the immediate suspension of COVID-19 vaccination for individuals of childbearing and reproductive age.

A new analysis of CDC data by Ethical Skeptic shows children born following mass mRNA vaccination of mothers are dying at a seventy seven percent excess rate. That's nearly eighteen thousand additional deaths in ages zero to four since 2021. The CDC's own death certificate records revealed an inflection point after thirty years of steady decline in infant and child mortality. So two distinct signals emerged, teratogenic effects, so rising deaths among infants exposed in utero, but the most concerning is transgenerational effects sustained excess mortality rates seen in children who were never infected, never injected, but whose parents previously were. These findings are not speculative models. They come straight from the government's records. If confirmed, this represents a public health crisis of historic magnitude, one affecting not those who were injected, but their children, grandchildren, and generations yet to be born.