reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Many young people rely solely on TikTok for news. A video about border issues went viral on social media but was abruptly shut down. This censorship stifles free speech and prevents people from seeing the truth. It's concerning how we are silencing each other instead of upholding our right to free speech. This normalization of censorship is alarming.

An immigrant allegedly assaulted a 60-year-old woman in Verilanian Park, Hertfordshire on April 10th. Later that day, the speaker encountered a man who made a sexual proposition. The speaker rebuffed him, after which he approached two schoolgirls. The speaker intervened, telling the girls to take pictures, but they did not send them to her. The man then walked towards a children's playground. The speaker later learned the same man sexually assaulted a 16-year-old that day. After recognizing him in the press, she contacted the police. An officer confirmed he fit the description but then canceled taking a statement on her supervisor's orders. The man is out on bail for the other sexual assault. The speaker believes he barely speaks English and is new to the country. A post warning about the man was blocked by a local Facebook group, so she is now sharing the information on TikTok to warn women, especially in Verilanian Park.

Last year, 3,300 people were arrested in Britain for what they said on social media. One example is a young woman named Chelsea Russell from Liverpool. She posted the lyrics of her friend's favorite rap song on Instagram, which included the n-word. As a result, she was arrested, prosecuted, found guilty, and given 500 hours of community service. She was also under a curfew from 8 PM to 8 AM for a year. This incident highlights the increasing number of people being visited by the police for their social media posts in Britain.

On Memorial Day 2020, I went birdwatching in Central Park at 5:30 AM, hoping to find a morning warbler. While searching, I encountered a woman with her dog off-leash, which is against park rules. After a verbal exchange, she threatened to call the police, claiming I was threatening her life. I recorded the incident to document her violation. The video went viral, coinciding with George Floyd's murder, highlighting racial bias in policing. The police eventually arrived, but I chose to leave and continue birdwatching. The Manhattan DA wanted to prosecute her for filing a false report, but I decided not to participate, believing her public shaming was sufficient. I felt it was more important to focus on broader issues rather than just this case.

I angered many people on TikTok, including someone named Thomas. We discovered Thomas' identity and reported his threatening videos to the police, along with his personal information and social media accounts. We also obtained contact information for the local police department and the chief and deputy chief. I have already shared this information. The police were not impressed with Thomas' videos and expressed concern about his inappropriate fetishes on TikTok. This was an interesting experience.

A pregnant woman in Australia was charged with incitement after livestreaming her arrest on Facebook for allegedly encouraging friends to attend a lockdown protest. The speaker expresses disappointment in Australia's lack of freedom of speech and questions how the government can justify throwing people in prison for expressing their opinions. The woman pleads with the officers, mentioning her upcoming ultrasound appointment and the fact that she is pregnant. The video ends with the speaker stating that they would like Australia more if it had freedom of speech.

I made a viral video about New York planning quarantine camps, which was criticized and removed for false information. Recent events show it may not have been false. The mainstream media called me a liar, but now people in New York are concerned about the camps. Maybe conspiracy theorists aren't crazy. The difference between a conspiracy theory and reality is about 6 months. The situation is alarming, and the video might be taken down, but this is why they want TikTok gone. Maybe I'm not a liar after all.

In a viral video on social media, a person is seen masturbating in a women's bathroom. The person in question identifies as a woman but has a penis. The video raises questions about whether it is acceptable for a man dressed as a woman to engage in such behavior in a women's bathroom. The speaker urges people to stand for truth and not fall for political correctness, as the future of our children depends on it.

A creator states they went to the police station because a prominent creator incited mob violence against them, their property, and family due to differing views on pesticide use. The speaker claims their phone and social media accounts were flooded, and they received death threats, which have been reported to the police. The speaker alleges the other creator is targeting them for posting about not using pesticides like glyphosate on their Facebook page. They claim the creator wants the posts removed and has threatened to continue doxxing them and ruining their life and business if they don't comply. The speaker says the creator commented on their appearance in a video. They state they are now working with the police and attorneys and that people are sending them screenshots and emails expressing fear for their safety due to the mob violence allegedly encouraged in the creator's Facebook group.

Who is Susie Loftus? She is the head of trust and safety for US Data Security at TikTok. Before this role, she served as a special assistant attorney general under Kamala Harris in California. Loftus's background raises questions about potential biases in content moderation on the platform, particularly regarding conservative creators.

Speaker 0 mentions a recent incident on social media where someone claimed to have exposed a false information network. They also talk about another person who is signing a petition against a climate law at the Turkey Grand National Assembly, and how this news is circulating on social media. The speaker emphasizes that they have never reported anyone before.

A pregnant woman in Australia was charged with incitement after livestreaming her arrest on Facebook for allegedly encouraging friends to attend a lockdown protest. The speaker expresses disappointment in Australia's lack of freedom of speech and questions how the government can justify throwing people in prison for expressing opinions they don't like. The video highlights the woman's confusion and shock at being arrested, as well as the potential jail sentence she could face. Despite the criticism, the speaker still expresses love for Australia and its people, but believes the country would be better with freedom of speech.

There’s been a situation involving a woman accused of reporting the owners of a squirrel and raccoon in New York. I know Monica Heasler personally, and she has been unfairly targeted without any proof. She used to rehabilitate squirrels and was involved in a Facebook discussion where someone made rude comments about the animal owners. Monica suggested the commenter might be the one who reported them, which led to her being falsely accused. People have doxxed her, fat-shamed her, and sent her death threats. This is unjust. If you claim to support women, you shouldn’t be so quick to condemn someone without evidence. Monica has the right to defend herself legally, as this has severely impacted her life and business. The real issue lies with the New York government, not Monica.

The speaker discusses the strange obsession of both far-right and liberal accounts on TikTok with posting about children and Law and Order SVU. They find it odd how these accounts constantly focus on this topic, even going as far as criticizing someone for simply mentioning having a sandwich for lunch. The speaker questions the mentality behind this behavior and deems it as deeply weird.

The speaker is being pulled over and told they were speeding and asked to slow down. The speaker states they have a nice day every day. The speaker intends to put the police officer on TikTok to show how police officers act. The speaker believes that if they were a white woman, the officer would not have stopped them, but because they are a Black woman, the officer is bothering them. The speaker films the officer's truck and identifies it as belonging to the sheriff's office.

A journalist covering far-right extremism had a concerning experience while walking home. A man recognized her from TikTok, which was surprising since she thought no one knew her. Shortly after, she received a message from an anti-racist researcher, informing her that a picture of her had been posted on a far-right extremist messaging board, along with her location. Unaware of this, she walked by a courthouse where a Freedom Convoy trial was taking place. One of the protesters filmed her, seemingly recognizing her. She checked Twitter and saw the warning from her researcher friend. Feeling unsafe, she called a security contact, sought refuge in a mall, and eventually managed to go home discreetly. This incident highlights the need for constant vigilance, even when encountering seemingly friendly individuals.

A pregnant woman in Australia was arrested and charged with incitement after live-streaming her arrest on Facebook. She allegedly encouraged friends to attend a lockdown protest. The speaker expresses disbelief that Australia does not have freedom of speech and questions how the government can throw people in prison for expressing their opinions. The woman, who is pregnant, pleads with the officers, mentioning that she has an ultrasound appointment. She could face up to 15 years in jail. The speaker concludes by saying that they would like Australia more if it had freedom of speech.

A person is upset because a "filthy migrant" spat on them. Police officers challenge the person's language, stating they have a duty to do so because it is offensive, especially in public. The person defends their statement that "filthy migrants attacking English people is disgusting." The officers also note the person is swearing. The person asks if swearing is a crime and says they are not interested in a "PC lecture," but is willing to give their details.

A single mom named Ramona, who is one of the COVID patients hospitalized in Australia, shared her story to raise awareness about the dangers of the virus. However, some people on social media doubted the authenticity of the video, claiming that the patients were paid actors. One TikToker investigated and found that Ramona was not actually a patient at Concord Hospital. The TikTok video gained significant views before being removed.

A woman recounts an incident in Verilanian Park, Hertfordshire, where on April 10th at approximately 4:30 PM, an immigrant approached her while she was walking her dog and made a sexual advance. She rebuffed him, and he then approached two schoolgirls on a bench. The woman intervened, preventing him from reaching the girls, and they walked away. The speaker later learned that the same man had sexually assaulted a 16-year-old earlier that day. She contacted the police after recognizing him from media reports, but the police initially declined to take her statement, even though the suspect was out on bail for the assault. She believes he barely spoke English and was "fresh off a boat." Her attempt to warn other women on a local mum group was blocked by the admin. She is now using TikTok to warn women to be careful in Verilanian Park.

A woman in Rochester, Minnesota, was recorded berating a young black boy at a park, repeatedly calling him the n-word. A man at the park confronted her about her language. The woman claimed the child took her son's belongings, justifying her use of the slur by saying, "If that's what he's gonna act like. That's what you're gonna call him." The man recording the video stated the child has autism and that nothing justifies her behavior. He also said that after he stopped recording, the woman continued to hurl slurs, told him and his wife to leave the country, and pretended to call someone to "handle things." The speaker asks viewers to identify the woman, focusing on her face and tattoos, stating she is a danger to children and shouldn't be around them.

The woman behind the bullying Internet account, Libs of TikTok, was appointed to the Oklahoma library Board, despite not being from Oklahoma. This highlights the harmful impact of far-right attacks and elevating anti-trans individuals. Tragically, a non-binary student in Oklahoma was bullied to death. Let's show respect and kindness to non-binary individuals today. Reach out to a non-binary person and offer love and compassion. Thank you. Translation: The person who manages the bullying account, Libs of TikTok, was appointed to the Oklahoma library Board, even though she is not from Oklahoma. This emphasizes the dangerous effects of far-right attacks and promoting anti-trans individuals. Sadly, a non-binary student in Oklahoma was bullied to death. Let's show respect and kindness to non-binary individuals today. Reach out to a non-binary person and offer love and compassion. Thank you.

Speaker 0 questions Nicole about online posts to the Prime Minister of Canada, asking if she has anything to say about that. Speaker 1 asks for specifics: what post, what she specifically said, and whether there is a screenshot. Speaker 0 cites that she online said something specific and asks for clarification. Speaker 1 replies that she said, "he's a Zionist scumbag, and he's not my prime minister," adding that she believes she is not spoken to properly and questions whether she looks like a threat. Speaker 0 explains that they came to talk because those threats were made. Speaker 1 pushes back, saying that the officers should be busy addressing real crime rather than harassing her over things she says online, and questions whether she seriously looks like a threat. Speaker 0 acknowledges and continues. Speaker 1 accuses the officers of wasting tax dollars and asserts that they should not be harassing her for what she says online because she dislikes the prime minister. Speaker 0 states Nicole should be aware that if such behavior continues, there will be consequences, implying potential arrest for threats. Speaker 1 asks what kind of threats they are referring to and demands to see what she said, noting that she still has not been shown. Speaker 0 attempts to explain what she said and what constitutes threats, warning that if those threats continue, she could be arrested and charged. Speaker 1 complains about being interrupted, asking to show what she said, and then launches into a hostile remark, calling the situation Communist Canada and asking how the officers can take pride in their work. Speaker 0 reiterates that she may have her opinion, but she insists she cannot say what she says. Speaker 1 refuses to discuss further, telling them not to touch her door. Speaker 0 says a report will be filed, stating that the search behavior continues, and mentions Trump in a dismissive way ("the Trump blah blah blah blah blah"). Speaker 1 asserts she will say whatever she wants about the prime minister and that they cannot control her speech, calling it just words. Speaker 0 responds that they are asking for non-threatening language. Speaker 1 concludes by stating they will continue to speak freely and that the conversation is over, wishing them a nice day and goodbye.

The speaker questions why they are being arrested and in handcuffs. They state the arrest is due to sharing something someone else posted. The speaker emphasizes that the original poster was not arrested. The speaker believes the situation has escalated unnecessarily. The speaker says someone experienced anxiety based on their social media taste. The speaker clarifies that the post they shared was not their original creation.