TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Secretary of State Raffensperger sent a contractor to Fulton County, known for its voting issues. The contractor witnessed double scanning of ballots, unidentified individuals taking election materials, and discussions about disrupting the election. A 29-page report detailing errors, mismanagement, and chaos in the election was known to state officials since November. This contradicts Raffensperger's claims during a phone call with President Trump. It is unlikely that Raffensperger's office was unaware of the report.

The speaker claims that real-time Edison data reveals election data manipulation. According to the speaker, Seidl receives raw election data directly from election officials in at least nine states. The speaker alleges that an additive process should show more votes, not deletions, in each interval report. However, a video of Edison reports allegedly shows pauses, oscillation, and deletions in total, in-person, and mail-in votes. The speaker claims this is the algorithm trying to figure out the math problem. The speaker points to North Carolina and Georgia counties as examples, noting Seidl directly contracts with Georgia. The speaker then plays a clip of someone discussing estimated vote percentages dropping, suggesting the reported results are not actual results. The speaker questions the calling of races with razor-thin margins, particularly Arizona, based on projections and alleged impossible data anomalies. The speaker asserts that historically, those counting votes called races, but now machines and news outlets do, deterring challenges.

Georgia owes President Donald J. Trump an apology for election fraud. Evidence shows 17,852 votes were counted without ballot images, and 3,930 ballots were scanned and counted twice intentionally. The process involved randomly selecting and rescanning ballots on different days. This deliberate duplication was not an administrative error but human intervention, constituting election fraud. The speaker urges Secretary Raffensperger to investigate independently.

Linda McLaughlin and her colleagues present a data-focused argument alleging election fraud in Georgia, supported by multiple data analyses and demonstrations. - Linda McLaughlin introduces the data integrity group and states that data is numerical and non-partisan; she aims to remedy a lack of presented data in the discussion. - Dave Labou, a lead data scientist, explains that their analysis across precincts, counties, and the state identified over 40 data points of negative voting or vote switching across candidates totaling over 200,000 votes. Separately, machine learning algorithms used for anomaly detection in fraud detection flagged over 500 precincts with over 1,000,000 corresponding votes showing suspicious activity. He emphasizes that the process is scientific and not tied to political affiliations. - Labou uses a banking analogy to illustrate data integrity concerns: in hypothetical online banking, deposits or withdrawals being redirected or split would indicate fraudulent activity. He applies this concept to voting data, arguing that the voting system data aligns with the Secretary of State data used to certify results, yet exhibits patterns akin to transfers and reallocation not authorized by voters. - He states that the data are publicly available but require advanced programming to extract, parse, and join datasets. Their independent team has made all analysis, programs, and data public to allow replication and has produced videos to translate the analysis for broader understanding. - A key claim is that receiving over 90% in a precinct is a marker for fraud; in Fulton County, more than 150 precincts voted 90% or more for Biden, and in the statewide race (decided by less than 13,000 votes), these 150 Fulton precincts accounted for 152,000 Biden votes, described as a clear indicator of suspicious or fraudulent activity. - Labou and team present a series of visuals and explanations indicating explicit vote count switching, e.g., in Dodge County, where Trump’s votes appear to be subtracted while Biden’s counts increase in tandem with county updates, leading to a shift in totals that would not appear in state totals due to timing of updates. - They reference adjudication as the review of ballots flagged during scanning, noting that only ballots with a contest causing questions about how the computer reads them are adjudicated. - In DeKalb County, they assert it is statistically impossible for nine out of ten voters to vote for Biden in 94 precincts. - They describe a data flow in Fulton County: poll pad check-in, ballot image saved on the machine, SD cards transported to drop-off locations, escorted to a warehouse, run through Democracy Suite, exported to a Dominion server, and inserted into a SQL Server database before transmission to the Secretary of State and data aggregators. - A critical point is the vulnerability within the county update data-entry process: the square box detailing data-entry options in the election software allows updating vote batches, projecting batches, and generating new or temporary batches that can be injected directly into the tally; these options can be validated and published, enabling potential manipulation before server upload. - They pose questions about validation: whether two observers from both parties were present during SD card transmissions and drop-off transmissions, and whether there is a public log of exchanges at drop-off points. They challenge why elected officials have not pursued these questions about voting integrity. - Labou notes the process is machine-to-machine and, by design, should not decrement sums; any decrement requires a robust explanation, and their data suggest negative drops are inconsistent with normal sequential processes. Speaker 2 clarifies the data sources (CITL election night data and Edison/New York Times data) and asserts that the process from poll pads to secretary of state is machine-driven, with no human entry of totals, thereby removing human entry error as an explanation for observed negative changes. Speaker 4 adds emphasis on the validation and potential vulnerabilities in the software options used for election administration, underscoring the need for transparency and inquiry into the electoral process.

The speaker discusses cybersecurity concerns in the election system, alleging that votes are stored on servers in Germany and could be manipulated by hackers. They point to suspicious vote count changes in swing states and highlight vulnerabilities in the software that could allow for vote manipulation. The speaker questions the transparency of the election process and calls for investigations into potential fraud. In Georgia, a hand recount of all ballots was announced following demands from the Trump campaign.

Votes in Georgia were counted three times using paper and machines. Concerns were raised about the lack of transparency and oversight in the vote review process, especially during adjudication. The speakers emphasized the importance of open-source voting programs to ensure transparency and prevent manipulation. They highlighted the need for concrete evidence and clear processes to build trust in the election system. Open-source systems were seen as a way to increase transparency and accountability in elections.

New evidence suggests that there was no voting machine election audit performed in Georgia, despite claims by the Secretary of State. This is concerning because Georgia played a crucial role in the 2020 election. A public comment during a state election board meeting revealed that there is little to no evidence that the audit actually took place. In addition, Georgia election workers are suing Giuliani and seeking to bar him from making public statements about the election. Surveillance footage shows workers scanning the same stack of ballots multiple times and continuing to count after observers had left. The video evidence and accounts from the 2020 election point to clear election fraud, yet there seems to be a lack of evidence to support further investigation.

The speaker reveals that zero audits were conducted by Pro VNB, contradicting the Secretary of State's claims. They then highlight that Fulton County counted 20,713 votes that did not exist in the 2020 election, with the majority favoring Joe Biden. The speaker also mentions the absence of records for 10 tabulators, which were included in the election night results. They accuse Brad Raffensperger, Brian Kemp, Fannie Willis, Georgia Democrats, and others of being aware of the election fraud. The speaker asserts that Donald Trump won Georgia and the 2020 election, claiming that the left stole it using tactics like blocking observers and bringing in truckloads of ballots. They emphasize that this evidence was provided to the Trump team.

In June of 2021, we informed them of suspected counterfeit ballots. Despite warnings, GOP propaganda cast doubt on the legitimacy of the ballots. Officials knew about this but failed to prevent a repeat in 2022. Their inaction enabled the same issue to occur in 2020.

The speaker discusses an incident where there were errors in the vote count for Biden and Trump. They explain that the voting machine generated a high number of errors, which were then sent for adjudication. The rate of ballots needing adjudication was 68%, much higher than the federal allowable rate of 1 in 125,000. The speaker suggests that this program is designed to generate errors and manipulate votes. They also mention that on November 4th, all system files related to adjudication were deleted. This is seen as a significant issue.

The speaker asserts the voting system is antiquated and difficult to understand due to state-by-state differences. Georgia's hand-counting of ballots exacerbates this and creates opportunities for misinformation. Differences in vote counting and announcement times were used to sow doubt on the election outcome, as seen in the January 6th committee findings. Average Americans, after being misled, engaged in political violence on January 6th. The speaker believes we must prepare for potential election challenges, noting numerous lawsuits already filed concerning various aspects of voting, suggesting a foundation is being laid to contest the election outcome.

The speaker discusses issues with the election in Georgia, specifically mentioning missing ballot images and hash validation files. They criticize the hand count process and mention duplicated Dropbox custody forms. They also highlight that poll tapes were not signed by witnesses. The speaker expresses frustration with the report from the cyber and security infrastructure agency and the sealing of the Halderman report. They mention the need for rigorous post-election audits and criticize the lack of risk limiting audits in the 2022 elections.

The Georgia state election board voted to require hand-counting ballots in November, potentially lengthening the time to tally results. This decision raises concerns about the intention behind it, especially with the election a month and a half away. It is questioned whether the state has the capacity to hand-count nearly 10 million votes. Concerns are raised about staffing at the county level and security for volunteers, who have been threatened in the past. The decision could create chaos and make it easier for Donald Trump to call election officials and ask them to find votes, similar to what allegedly happened after 2020. The speaker hopes the decision is challenged in court, fearing a return to the chaos of the 2000 Florida election.

Georgia owes President Trump an apology following his indictment by Fulton County, which has violated election law multiple times. Evidence shows that 17,852 votes were counted without ballot images, and 20,713 ballots were counted without proper receipts. Additionally, 3,930 ballots were scanned and counted twice, contradicting claims of accidental errors. This duplication resulted from intentional human intervention, which is a basis for alleging election fraud. The process involved randomly selecting batches of previously scanned ballots and counting them again on a different day. This was not an administrative mistake but a deliberate act. The call to action is for Secretary Raffensperger to investigate these findings independently.

- Speaker 0 asserts that mail-in ballots are corrupt and that a Republican-led effort will end mail-in ballots, including drafting an executive order by “the best lawyers in the country.” They claim the U.S. is nearly the only country using mail-in ballots and cite “massive fraud all over the place,” arguing that secure, paper-ballot elections with watermarking would produce faster results (claims that paper ballots provide results the same night, whereas machines allegedly take two weeks). - The conversation references a specific election night anomaly: a block of 138,000 votes (Speaker 1 and Speaker 2 confirm “138,000” votes) all reportedly voting for Biden with no Trump votes in that segment, described as inexplicable and not consistent with expected linear reporting. They note the timing as around 04:30–06:30 in the morning and suggest the results should not be linear given numerous counters reporting across states. They also complain that Nevada stopped counting mid-day, calling it inexplicable and illogical. - Speaker 4 claims a counting software glitch caused a 6,000-vote swing in a county, where ballots counted for Democrats were miscalculated for Republicans; she states that 47 counties use the same software. - Speaker 5 demonstrates concerns about voting-machine security: he shows how a bad actor could gain full admin access in under two minutes by opening a device, removing the card reader, and bypassing error messages, implying easy manipulation of tabulation in 18 states using the machine. - Speaker 6 describes observed ballot processing irregularities: a ballot-stuffing environment where ballots are stamped and filled in rapidly at the top of tickets, with security oversight present but gaps noted in workflow. - Speaker 7 discusses absentee/mail-in ballots with suspicions about sequence numbers: numbers appeared almost sequential, suggesting they could not be from mailed-in ballots, as mailed ballots typically arrive at different numbers; they note there was no date on envelopes and that some details would not be in poll books or the system, alleging irregularities in how ballots were handled. - Speaker 8 reports ongoing theft of duplicate ballots: a table for duplicates existed, but ballots were copied and redistributed at various tables, with duplicates not fully processed and ballots stashed under boxes; the speaker claims this occurred throughout the night. - Speaker 9 recounts a local media denial of fraud at the TCF center, contrasted with video obtained later showing a van delivering ballots after hours; she describes escort cars, a back-and-forth of ballots, and suggests the presence of unobserved ballots and a lack of witnesses during tabulation. She notes that the video was shared publicly and led to the suspension of a social-media account. - Speaker 10 provides a timeline from October 21, detailing a driver delivering mail-in ballots from New York to Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and then to Lancaster, with the driver faced hours of waiting, lack of slips, and unclear purpose for moving the load; the driver states that this was the only time he transported mail-in ballots and expresses a belief in the importance of honest elections for Americans.

Georgia's recount is being questioned due to the use of allegedly flawed auditing software. The program requires county elections directors to input their information into the secretary of state's system, allowing the state to dictate the results instead of the counties reporting to the state. Election monitor Garland Favorito expressed concern over this compromised audit process. He observed a significant increase in Joe Biden's vote count while Donald Trump's count appeared to decrease. Favorito found this discrepancy to be unrealistic and fundamentally flawed. The secretary of state's office has not yet responded to these concerns.

- The discussion centers on Fulton County’s ballot-seizure case and the implication that the affidavit relied on was built from recycled conspiracy theories by a known conspiracy figure. It is asserted that the judge was not told these issues had already been relitigated, and that the administration appears intent on applying the same approach elsewhere. - Question raised: can these efforts be stopped, given the underlying pattern and what the other side is pursuing? And what is their plan for 2026 if they lack the 2020 conspiracies to lean on? - Jen notes her role as counsel in the Fulton County matter and declines to comment further on the specifics. - Jessica forecasts that Trump-aligned actors will pull out 2020 ballots and photos, arguing that the numbers don’t add up and that the machines were faulty and the people fudged because, allegedly, in Fulton County they did. She emphasizes that there is no evidence that the irregularities would have changed the outcome in Georgia, but acknowledges there were thousands of irregularities, with records destroyed and chain-of-custody issues, and that the recount and audit were of poor quality. She warns that in 2026 the same approach could be used again with untrustworthy machines and flawed audits, and warns that even if actual facts are shown, they would highlight known errors. - Marilyn adds the point that a Barack Obama-appointee judge confirmed the unreliability of the machines and notes a demonstrator at DEFCON Voting Village showed how easily a Dominion machine can be hacked. She cites a view that Biden still won Georgia, despite the “fudged audits,” and argues that the intent behind the questionable procedures was to obscure errors. - Jessica identifies Raffensperger as the official who chose the machines and funded the expansive spending on them, suggesting he did not want critical issues to be exposed. She asserts that the process was designed to avoid scrutiny and that the results were obtained by running ballots through the machine multiple times to adjust numbers, including using test ballots to influence results. - The conversation concludes with a focus on the importance of recounts and audits, and the need for a transparent process in 2026. Jessica argues that Georgia’s issues stemmed from an audit with bogus processes and a recount conducted through machines rather than a hand count at counting tables with observers from both campaigns and the clerk. She asserts that the transparency of the counting process could have mitigated much of the controversy and that the lesson for 2026 is to implement a transparent system.

All votes in The United States Of America are counted in The United States Of America. There is no evidence that any machine has been manipulated by a foreign power. Recounts are consistent with the initial count, confirming that the systems used in the twenty twenty election performed as expected. The American people should have 100% confidence in their vote. A lawyer representing the president claimed that Dominion voting machines ran an algorithm to take votes from President Trump and flip them to President Biden. Votes in Georgia were cast on paper, counted by a machine, and recounted by hand, with consistent outcomes. If there was an algorithm flipping votes, it didn't work. The more likely explanation is that there was no algorithm and that security controls protected the systems from misbehavior.

Philip Davis identified approximately 4,000 fake double-scan ballots in Fulton County's machine recount. Individuals who filed the case, Joe Rossi and Kevin Mokla, advised by Philip Davis, have concluded with evidence that those 4,000 ballots were intentionally counted twice in the Fulton recount. There were three vote counts in Georgia 2020. The first vote count had massive manipulation. In the second count, the digital votes did not match the ballots, so they falsified the hand count to match the first machine count. In the third count, the ballots didn't match the digital votes, so they falsified the third count by double scanning ballots. The whole effort was to match that first count.

There was meaningful voter fraud in Fulton County, Georgia during the 2020 election. At least 36 batches of mail-in ballots were double counted, totaling over 4,000 votes. The Atlanta Journal Constitution independently reviewed digital ballot images and found hundreds of improperly duplicated ballots. Surveillance footage obtained by Voter GA showed ballots being scanned multiple times. Fulton County failed to provide over 100,000 audit tally sheets, and when they were finally turned over, falsified sheets were found. A whistleblower noticed that the mail-in ballots had no creases and were filled out by a printer. An elections expert found that nearly 35,000 voters illegally voted in their old county. It is important to find out the truth and ensure the integrity of our elections.

A last-minute change involves an additional hand count of ballots, which raises concerns. The normal process is an audit after the election in a controlled environment, which is easier to observe and monitor. Hand counting by tired people in front of others increases the chance of mistakes. Gabriel Sterling, a top election official in Georgia, says election workers are ready for conspiracy theories, chaos, and confusion. They went through it in 2020 with many conspiracy theories and former president Trump contesting the result. He says they know what is ahead.

Multiple speakers express concerns about the legitimacy of elections, focusing on the 2016, 2000, 2004, and 2018 elections. Several speakers claim that Russian interference affected the outcome of the 2016 election, leading them to view Trump as an illegitimate president. Some believe Trump is aware of this illegitimacy. The 2000 Bush v. Gore election is cited as an example of a court-appointed president, with claims that Al Gore won Florida but the Supreme Court halted the vote count. The 2004 election in Ohio is described as riddled with problems, including malfunctioning machines and allegations of voting rights violations. Some believe John Kerry privately thought the election was stolen. The 2018 Georgia gubernatorial election is also disputed, with accusations that Brian Kemp, then Secretary of State, suppressed votes and disenfranchised voters, leading to Stacey Abrams' loss. Speakers assert the election was not fair and that Abrams likely won. Concerns are raised about the integrity of electronic voting machines and the lack of paper trails.

We counted Georgia's election ballots three times, confirming no consequential fraud. Despite issues with ballot images and scanning errors, the recount showed similar results to the original count. Doubts remain about double scanning and counting of votes, suggesting potential fraud. The Secretary of State's office conducted an exhaustive investigation, but concerns persist about the accuracy of the results. The Georgia State Election Board is commended for their diligence and transparency in addressing election issues.

Speaker 0: I won, but they cheated. We were robbed of an election. Speaker 1: I don't think it's dangerous to use words like rigged and steal because we can back it up. Speaker 0: The election was stolen from the voters, not just from me. I won't concede because our democracy is being eroded. Speaker 1: The election was not free and fair. Thousands of Georgians had their voices stolen. We can't guarantee their votes will be counted in 2020. Speaker 2: Should the Democratic nominee concede if they can prove widespread voter suppression? Speaker 1: No, we shouldn't concede until we know the results. If it looks like cheating or rigging, it probably is. Speaker 0: We've been taught to accept defeat, but I refuse to concede. The process was not fair. Speaker 1: The election was stolen from Georgia voters. As long as eligible citizens can't vote, the system is rigged. I didn't lose, I just didn't win. Speaker 0: I didn't win officially. We don't know what really happened because of voter suppression. Speaker 1: He is the legal governor, but that doesn't mean he won legitimately. Speaker 0: Just because you win doesn't mean you won. We'll never know for sure if I got more votes. Speaker 1: I refuse to concede because it wasn't fair or right. He performed poorly and crassly against the people he represents. Speaker 1: Georgia voters were suppressed, their votes weren't counted. Brian Kemp dismantled our democracy. Speaker 0: I recognize I'm not the governor, but we won.

This transcript discusses a risk limiting audit report conducted by county election officials in Georgia for the 2020 presidential contest. The original machine count showed a 0.3% margin between Joe Biden and Donald Trump, leading to a manual count of over 5 million ballots. The decision to conduct this audit has been criticized by Philip Stark, a statistics professor at the University of California Berkeley, who referred to it as a "Frankencount." The process has been referred to as a risk limiting audit, a hand recount, and an audit, but it remains unclear what it actually is.