reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0: All of the world's timber frames that are at least 500 years old are on stone foundations because stone is superior to concrete because it doesn't wick moisture. So your wood can sit directly on the stone without rotting as quickly.

We apply a flame to the material, and it doesn’t burn, producing no smoke or flame spread, with no thermal transfer. Our sustainable building materials are made from hemp and lime, both abundant in Alberta. We’ve created a structural block that requires no cement, concrete, or rebar; they simply stack like Lego with an adhesive binder. The main benefits include improved indoor air quality and comfort, regulating humidity and preventing mold growth. The material maintains even temperatures, making it ideal for living spaces. Each block captures about 6 kilos of CO2, contributing to a negative carbon footprint for the completed building. This is a pilot facility, and we aim for commercial production.

Speaker 0: Hey, guys. I am on the campus all over again, and you guys know where am I. And you could Right there are the flowers area. Let's see what's going on here. Okay. This place literally got fully constructed. Like, the platform he was sitting at, it got fully constructed. And I told you about this in the evening yesterday when I was coming to the gym that there is a big flag hung over the platform where he was sitting, and it's still there. So they have put these blocks of, I don't know, concrete on that platform. And, yep, it's going to be one week tomorrow.

We manufacture sustainable building materials using hemp and lime. Our structural blocks, which require no cement or concrete, are stacked like Lego with an adhesive binder. The main advantage of our hemp building system is the indoor air quality and comfort it provides. It regulates humidity, prevents mold growth, and maintains even temperatures. Additionally, it keeps buildings cooler in the summer. As the hemp plant grows, it absorbs carbon dioxide and stores it in the material, resulting in a negative carbon footprint. Our pilot facility is working towards commercial production.

Speaker 1 describes the “viewing platform” portion of the roof of the Dendera Hathor temple, noting that the polygonal roofing and what appears to be a huge casting effort caught their attention during a visit the previous year. In April, Speaker 1 and a colleague spent three full days on the roof in scorching heat, taking measurements and several thousand photographs, which were assembled into a large JPG to be uploaded to Speaker 1’s website. They present a top-down view of the roof resembling a drone perspective, created without permission to fly a drone. Speaker 1 then draws lines extending from the left-hand edges of the stones and claims that extending every edge of every stone leads each line to converge on the edge of a hole in the outer wall, as though a stake or post had been set in that hole with a string wrapped around it. They first extend the edges of stones in the far left vertical row (red lines), initially suggesting it could seem like a coincidence because the lines align with edges of bowtie-shaped recesses connecting wall stones. Speaker 1 then extends the edges of stones in the second row (green) and argues the alignment continues. Speaker 0 responds that the “coincidence theory completely falls apart” when extending the edges of the third row of stones (purple), and Speaker 0 adds that it stays collapsed when the fourth row comes along (yellow). Speaker 1 says the rest is left for the audience to examine. Speaker 1 asserts that every edge of every stone was designed this way, laid out with string and then “carved,” and that the same applies to the vertical edges. They further claim it applies to tiny fragments and lines only a few inches long, referencing examples shown the day before. Speaker 1 concludes that there is “nothing accidental on this roof, period.” They end with a thought experiment: if the stones in the vertical walls were measured out the same way by the ancient builders and there is no random line there either, they ask how such an outcome could be accomplished.

The speaker discusses the 1893 Chicago World’s Fair, describing it as an event where “temporary palaces” were allegedly constructed with temporary materials and then demolished immediately afterward. They argue that the repeated claim that the structures were built with temporary coatings like “staff” does not match evidence they say still exists, including the Museum of Science and Industry, which they say “looks exactly like” other fair buildings and was made with stone (Indiana limestone). They state that they do not see updates adding limestone later, and they claim the buildings were instead constructed with stone, including bridges. They point to an “old world bridge located in Jackson Park,” saying it is still visible today but has been marked “endangered,” is closed to the public, and is overgrown with weeds. They claim authorities and people want it removed. They also describe the administration building as resembling European palaces (they mention Vienna and Budapest) with fountains, columns, arched windows, and balconies, and they claim the buildings are connected underground with tunnels, asserting that underground infrastructure existed under the fair. The speaker claims that after the World’s Fair ended in October 1893, buildings were allegedly destroyed by July 1894 fires, but they say the exact fire causes were never conclusively determined. They assert that the “faulty wiring department” verified there was never a fire in July 1894 and that stone buildings are hard to burn and do not spread fires. They then move through additional buildings they say were also stone structures rather than staff, including an agricultural building “right on the water,” which they say included tunnels and basements that connect to each other. They state that the mainstream history does not know demolition details for the agricultural building (no known demolition contractor, no record, unknown date), and they emphasize this as part of a broader pattern of missing construction and demolition documentation. The speaker expands the claim to multiple structures, including a “beacon of progress,” described as a monument that they say may have been altered or removed from Chicago’s timeline before 1893, and they discuss an alleged 1,500-foot spire composed of 13 obelisks merging into one. They also reference what they describe as casino structures (including a “plastic building” they say was allegedly made from sticks and plaster, with “mud and clay” holding it together) and claim it was destroyed by a massive fire on July 5 after the fair closed. They further describe earlier claims (from a previous episode) that wooden scaffolding was used to repaint buildings white rather than for construction. Next, they mention a “cold storage building,” described as the “greatest refrigerator on earth,” with dimensions given (130 by 255 feet), serving the fair’s daily food needs, and they claim it was also burned down. Throughout, they argue that construction and destruction narratives do not account for the scale of stone palaces, tunnels, canals and lagoon systems, and the speed required to build everything in a single year, especially considering winter construction limits in Chicago. The speaker concludes by saying the destruction resembles major “great fire” events elsewhere and claims many buildings were removed or burned across multiple cities, urging viewers to comment if they want the remainder of their list.

Speaker 0 says they have a key point “up here,” then instructs that it will be brought and placed “right over here to the wall.”

Speaker 0: Hey, Rich. Yeah. Put it up in the fucking scaffolding. Hey. I'll make sure I don't know. Yes. Shit. It's warm.

The speaker believes mainstream narratives about the construction of old buildings are false, suggesting they are from a previous civilization and that history is fabricated. Fires destroying old buildings are a key giveaway. The speaker analyzes the Gonzales County Courthouse in Texas, highlighting that the original courthouse burned down in 1893 and a new one was supposedly completed by April 1896. The speaker questions how this was possible in such a short time, especially since the superintendent was a quarry owner. Using ChatGPT, the speaker determined that constructing a courthouse of that size in 1895 would take 4.5 to 7.5 years, requiring hundreds of laborers, thousands of bricks, and significant amounts of limestone, wood, steel, and glass. The speaker emphasizes the logistical challenges, particularly the water needed for the horses used for transportation. The speaker then discusses Yeshiva University High School, questioning the use of the word "founded" instead of "built." The speaker points out the speed at which the building was supposedly constructed and the lack of information about the construction process.

The speaker observes a large amount of material in the bottom of a creek bed. The speaker states they heard that chemicals were burned off of the material. The speaker then clarifies that the burning may have only affected the top layer.

Speaker 0 describes humanity through a contrast between ancient, living, natural-material buildings and modern AI accomplishments. He says cathedrals were built with natural materials and were living buildings, such that “when you would walk into this building, you would begin to heal.” He emphasizes that these structures are “built out of natural materials, and all of this has a resonance, which is very healing.” He places this in a historical frame, noting the alleged fifteenth and sixteenth centuries when they were “allegedly building this with hammer and chisel and no electricity, actually, with candles,” which he finds humorous. From there, he pivots to present-day advancements, stating that in 2025 researchers aim to translate dog sounds with AI. He uses this juxtaposition to illustrate a shift: “We went from cathedrals… to translating dog sounds like woof woof with AI.” He questions what “woof woof” means, asserting that “nobody even knows, but AI will tell us.” He underscores the claim with a sharp contrast: “No joke, just showing you this picture again. We went from here, right here, this cathedral, okay, to woof woof, my AI told me my dog is hungry.” He frames this progression as a descent into what he calls “idiocracy.” He then labels the old world and the current trajectory, connecting the idea of “this is the old world” to the present. He uses the AI-dominated example of interpreting dog sounds as illustrative of a broader concern: if we rely on AI to analyze basic signals like “woof woof, bark bark, whatever it may be,” then “we were really just losing it.” He explicitly states his position in dismissive terms about AI’s role: “this is idiocracy,” and he ties it to his argument that AI is “dumbing the people down.” In sum, Speaker 0 contrasts the healing, resonant properties of ancient living buildings built with natural materials against a modern era in which AI translates simple dog sounds, implying a progression from revered, tangible craftsmanship to AI-derived interpretations of basic animal vocalizations, which he characterizes as a decline or dumbing down of society.

Speaker 0 discusses gas prices, claiming they are wrecking the farmers and questions whether gas should be at this price. He attributes the oil shortage to a War with Iran, which he says was caused by “the tiny hats and the president.” He then says he checked a government website that breaks down petroleum coming in and going out, noting that “down below, you see that there’s actually more coming in now than there was a year ago.” He asks why prices are higher and suggests that someone might be lying about something, noting a discrepancy with claims that refining is insufficient. Speaker 0 continues by referencing the 1970s and stating that they “pulled the exact same playbook,” and he intends to have the audience hear a quote from “the Shah of Iran” about gas lines. He recalls: “Have you seen the lines of cars stretching for blocks, in some cases for miles, waiting to get gas… And you cannot you have imported more oil than any time in the past. Well, not recently, we haven't. You have?” He then remarks, “So after that video, we can see that there’s really no shortage and the gas prices are just being jacked up on purpose.” He asks who’s pulling the strings and answers, “the tiny hats,” asserting that the tiny hats “control the banks, control all of these things, manipulate the numbers, and then kinda screw the people.” He concludes by urging readers to notice the connection to Iran and says it’s “interesting,” leaving the audience to think about it, and ends with a reference to a 1976 water car. Speaker 2 introduces a tangential topic about Stan Meyer’s invention, the water fuel cell, which “takes the place of his old gas tank.” He explains that the water fuel cell “breaks down water molecules into oxygen and hydrogen,” and that hydrogen is used to run his dune buggy. Speaker 1 adds a note about what to use for the fuel cell: “I don't care if you use rain water, well water, city water, ocean water. If you don't have any fresh water, go ahead and use snow.” If there is no snow available, he suggests using salt water, claiming there is “no adverse effect to the fuel cell.”

In this video, we explore the art of geopolymer, which was used to create astonishing works of art in the dark ages. Geopolymer is the technique of casting artificial stone, and it can be recreated today. By using 3D printers to create molds, geopolymer blocks can be made, allowing for easier construction that can last for hundreds or even thousands of years. This raises questions about whether ancient civilizations used geopolymer casting to create structures worldwide, and challenges the truth we've been told about our ancestors.

The video explains that there is no such thing as “stone softening.” Instead, it describes chemical etching of stone to produce water glass (silicate) through a controlled reaction of lyes (potassium hydroxide and sodium hydroxide) with silica from sand, resulting in a hardened material used to imitate carved stone. Core idea and ingredients: - The process uses potassium hydroxide, sodium hydroxide, sand (or crushed stone like granite), and water. The presence of salt in Peruvian soil and plants explains the combination of KOH and NaOH in a craft context. - Lye makes the stone react chemically, producing water glass rather than actually softening stone. The two lyes are caustic and can etch glass; safety gear (goggles, rubber gloves) and outdoor operation are advised. - A eutectic effect lowers the melting point of the mixture to about 168°C when KOH and NaOH are combined, enabling the reaction to proceed at normal kitchen-like temperatures. - The method aims to melt the lyes with water and silica to form water glass, which then set into a solid, glue-like matrix capable of embedding sand to form an artificial stone. Setup and equipment: - A rock or inexpensive stainless steel pot is used; copper or iron would be destroyed by molten lye, so stone vessels are traditional, though a stainless pot is acceptable. - A hot plate provides the necessary heat; ventilation is important due to corrosive vapors, and only a small window may not suffice. - The artist notes that the pot’s material will be etched by lye, which is expected, and that the finished product is intended to be waterproof after drying. Day-by-day procedure and math: - Day 1: Measure 25 g potassium hydroxide and 25 g sodium hydroxide. Dissolve them in 1 deciliter of water (add lye to water, not vice versa). Add 100 g sand to the alkaline solution. The lyes dissolve some sand to form an initial water glass; for a modulus of 2.5 (longer silicate chains), more silica is needed, so 80 g is theoretically enough, but 100 g is used to allow margin since sand isn’t 100% CO2-free. - Boiling occurs in two rounds on different days. Early bubbles are tiny, then coin-sized, then large as more sand converts to water glass. The mixture can rise to about 180–250°C, with the eutectic point at 168°C. - After about 30 minutes, the first boil yields a soft, bottom layer; the material is cooled below 100°C, and 2 dl of water is added to dissolve the formed water glass. Day 2: the semi-solid mass dissolves within 24 hours, but a green tint indicates lye attacking the pot. - Initial product is modulus one water glass (one silicon oxide per metal atom). To increase modulus to two or three (stronger, longer silicate chains), a second boil is performed. The second boil begins after the water added has boiled away; the material heats further as modulus two material forms. Bubbling resumes as modulus two reacts with remaining sand, producing modulus two water glass and leaving a desert of modulus two material behind. - After cooling, water is reintroduced (2 dl) and left to sit for another 24 hours. Day three can show incomplete dissolution; Day four could include a third boil (not performed here for brevity), but the video proceeds to masonry work with the finished water glass. Masonry and use: - The finished water glass is mixed with additional sand to form a very wet slurry, shaped on a tilted tray to drain excess lye. After about a month, it becomes waterproof. If pine wood ash (about 100 g) is added, setting is accelerated, yielding waterproofing by the next day. - The method is claimed to replicate ancient Peruvian stone carvings and is said to work with granite rubble as well. The presenter invites others to test the recipe and verify results. Conclusion: - The video frames this as two cooking steps to produce water glass via a controlled reaction of potassium and sodium lye with sand, enabling the creation of an artificial, waterproof stone-like material with layered silicate structures.

A Canadian company invented indestructible bricks made from 90% plastic waste. The process involves crushing plastic, mixing it with concrete, and molding it into bricks like Lego pieces. These lightweight bricks are easy to handle and assemble without tools, weighing just £5 each. Despite their lightness, they are three times sturdier than traditional bricks. Would you trust them to build your future home? Translation: A Canadian company has created unbreakable bricks made from 90% plastic waste. The process involves crushing plastic, mixing it with concrete, and molding it into bricks like Lego pieces. These lightweight bricks are easy to handle and assemble without tools, weighing just £5 each. Despite their lightness, they are three times sturdier than traditional bricks. Would you trust them to build your future home?

We manufacture sustainable building materials using hemp and lime in Alberta. Our structural blocks do not need cement or rebar, just an adhesive binder. The hemp building system improves indoor air quality, regulates humidity, prevents mold, and maintains comfortable temperatures. Each block captures 6 kilos of CO2, resulting in a negative carbon footprint for the building.

In this video, we compare building materials from different time periods to see how they hold up under pressure. We test bricks from modern times, the 1950s, and the 1890s. The modern brick withstands 607 units of pressure, while the 1950s brick holds up to 1049 units. However, the brick from the 1890s impressively withstands 1175 units. Moving on to concrete, the modern version can handle 6321 units of pressure, but the old-world concrete surpasses it with over 18 tons. The speaker concludes that we are progressing in reverse. They encourage viewers to question everything.

Speaker 0 introduces electroculture as a way to boost a garden, noting that when they first began talking about it, many gardeners dismissed it as “woo woo.” Speaker 1 responds directly that electroculture does not work. They say that no study has ever confirmed that electroculture works in any appreciable amount, and that it is simple: it doesn’t work. Speaker 1 also says you don’t need to stick a copper rod in the ground because it “literally doesn’t do anything.” Speaker 0 then describes personal examples and claims from others who tried electroculture. One friend is said to have grown a 46 pound watermelon. Another friend is said to have tried it in Ireland, and Speaker 0 points to garlic with visible size differences. Speaker 0 also shows a cucumber example, claiming that everything gets bigger with electroculture. They describe multiple melons growing together and say it is “pretty wild.” Speaker 0 suggests that when you “think of nature,” things begin to “multiply.” Speaker 0 then addresses what they claim is taking place. They reference “Kirlian photography of pyramids,” stating that when looking at pyramids directly you can’t see anything happening, but in the photography “beams” appear, and they claim this indicates electroculture is manipulating the ether. Speaker 0 adds that there will always be people who insist “oh, no, no, it’s not true,” and then poses questions about why organizations would have done such work. They ask why the “Royal Agriculture Society” would be doing it in 1845 and 1873 if it were not effective. Speaker 0 frames this as a contrast between abundance and “the peasants,” saying the royals “know how to have abundance” while others do not. Speaker 0 further claims that it goes deeper when discovering that “the government was doing electric culture in the 1920s.” They connect these references—Royal Agriculture Society, government involvement, and access to abundance at one’s fingertips—then ask why people aren’t doing it. Speaker 0 ends with “Questions of the day?”

The speaker asks if wind turbines are made of epoxy resin in their blades, specifically mentioning bisphenol A. They express uncertainty about whether anyone at the table can answer the question and suggest taking it on notice. The speaker explains that bisphenol A is used in the epoxy resins of wind turbines and emphasizes its importance in the resins. They mention that if the resin breaks down and enters the water, it can harm marine life. The speaker acknowledges the significance of the question and agrees to provide a thorough answer later.

Speaker 0 decided to build a menhir in their backyard. They said one recipe is already proven and “rock solid,” and it “actually creates stone.” The binder they described is a mixture of water glass (sodium silicate) and pine ash. They noted that although the material looks gray, it contains “not a single gram of Portland cement,” and that the gray color comes from the wood ash. Speaker 0 is considering making the menhir about 9 to 10 meters tall (around 30 feet) and asked whether that height would be tall enough. They said the structure currently does not even reach their knees and referred to “here it is.”

Speaker 0 outlines a cavemen–style method for casting an artificial stone “huge stone” inside a plastic cup, using no cement mixer, no drill, no vibration, no scale. The process uses water glass, sand or crushed stone (granite grit or desert sand), and a pinch of slaked lime as a 2% catalyst. Step one: the spirit test. If your water glass doesn’t gel after a sip of whiskey or strong spirit, stop. Step two (for beginners): measure roughly 100 grams of sand or granite grit and 2 grams of slate lime, maintaining approximately a 2% catalyst. The presenter demonstrates by placing 100 g of silica sand in one cup and 1 g of lime in another, then adds a second gram of lime. The 2% catalyst visibly stains the sand white, so he no longer uses a scale and adds lime until the color clearly changes. He repeats this with ground granite—lime lightens it as well. The basalt powder shows no color change because it’s a modern ultra-fine powder where the lime disappears; the desert sand (lemon yellow, terrarium-type) also turns white with 2% lime. Four candidates are tested: silica sand, granite grit, basalt powder, and desert sand. Next, the wet mixing method. Instead of measuring the water glass, the mold (a plastic pudding cup) is filled with about one centimeter of undiluted water glass, often boiled to thicken. The dry, catalyzed mix is spooned into the water glass and immediately begins to clump due to surface dehydration and gelling. The clumps are broken up while still underwater to keep the mixture bubble-free; this is done by spooning and crushing beneath the liquid surface. The goal is to fill under the surface so bubbles rise out, preventing bubbles in the final stone. The process continues until the submerged fill reaches the height of the neighboring “stone wall.” Excess water glass is addressed by poking a hole low on the mold to allow the liquid to drain, rather than tipping the large stone out or using the cup to drain. The presenter notes that some nudges or “nubs” on real stones might have served to channel drainage, but in this method the nubs are optional. The same process is repeated for the other three candidates (granite, basalt, desert sand). After days, the stones shrink enough to pop out of the cups and they turn out gorgeously. In the first days, the material is still easy to carve; the granite version can be hollowed with a teaspoon, the basalt version is lower quality (as expected), and the desert sand version is described as awesome. The material can be cut with a knife in the initial days, reminiscent of ancient sarcophagi. The speaker imagines the potential for massive-scale casting and concludes with a nod to how the Incas hauled enormous stones to Machu Picchu—“in buckets.”

Put it up in the fucking scaffolding. I'll make sure I don't know. Yes. Shit. It's warm.

In this video, we compare building materials from different time periods. We test bricks from modern times, the 1950s, and the 1890s. The modern brick withstands 607 units of pressure, while the 1950s brick holds up to 1049 units. However, the brick from the 1890s impressively withstands 1175 units. Moving on to concrete, modern concrete can handle 6321 units of pressure, but the concrete from the old world surpasses it with over 18 tons. The evidence clearly shows that older materials were more durable. The speaker encourages us to question everything.

The transcript discusses “radioactive water,” described as something the government “would tell you to stay away from.” It references material dated “from 1914” and then “1912.” The speaker claims that in that period radium was infused into the water and that radium in water and clay turned it into “hot springs water,” which the speaker says gets its heat from radium, thorium, and plutonium present in the water. The speaker further claims that when people drank from this water, it “would get rid of arthritis, osteoporosis, all types of pain, neurological issues, and everything else.” They say they have been doing experiments for four days by drinking out of it and plan to drink from it during the video to show how radioactive it is. To demonstrate, they mention placing the water probe “in here,” stating the reading is “48 right now” and calling it “off the charts.” They add that if the probe is put “all the way in,” it reaches “90,” and they repeat that it is “radioactive water.” The speaker also says Galen Windsor described this as “all a lie,” claiming people were lied to “because they didn't want them to connect the energy with radium.” The speaker concludes by saying “Bottoms up,” drinking the water, and stating it “tastes like clay.” They also begin to say “they used to build things,” but the transcript ends there.

Speaker argues that a machine costs $60,000, yet he built his own for 15,000, and claims it’s better because it’s a 'lifetime design,' modular, and capable of repair in one hour. He contrasts this with a brand you have to discard after five years. He says he 'calculated that civilization needs just 50 machines to build everything from scratch' and that 'All of our designs are open source,' enabling worldwide collaboration to improve them. They apply the same open-source philosophy to housing, claiming they can 'build an entire house in just five days.' A house they’re training people to build in five days is 'for sale right now,' with all designs and instructions 'posted on our website for free.' They offer a two-week crash course now and a six-week program to 'build your own expandable, high quality starter home in six weeks.' Visit opensourceecology.org, link in the bio.